Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Discovery of an RRAT-like pulsar via its single pulses in an MWA imaging survey

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the discovery of PSR J0031-5726, a pulsar whose faint persistent pulses and sporadic bright bursts differ in arrival phase and polarization, suggesting a continuum between normal pulsars and rotating radio transients.

desk verdict Genuine new RRAT-like pulsar with a solid brightness-phase effect; the erratic polarization claims outrun the calibration and need a clearer caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02130 v1 pith:Q2ST7CNR submitted 2025-02-04 astro-ph.HE

Samuel J. McSweeney , Jared Moseley , Natasha Hurley-Walker , Garvit Grover , Csanád Horváth , Timothy J. Galvin , Bradley W. Meyers , Chia Min Tan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarsrotatingradiotransientssingle-pulseanalysispolarizationrotationmeasureimage-domaintransientsearchGLEAM-XhighGalacticlatitude
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery of PSR J0031-5726, a 1.57-second pulsar found at high Galactic latitude through its single pulses in an imaging survey rather than through a periodicity search. The authors show that the pulsar emits both faint, persistent pulses and sporadic, extremely bright pulses, and that the bright pulses arrive preferentially at later rotation phases than the dim ones. The bright pulses have dramatically varying polarization angles, so the summed profile is almost completely depolarized. The paper argues that this object may represent a class of pulsar intermediate between normal pulsars and rotating radio transients.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by combining an image-domain transient search, which subtracts snapshot images to build per-pixel time series, with archived voltage data from the Murchison Widefield Array that are beam-formed toward the source to recover single pulses at $100\,\mu$s and $10$ kHz resolution. Single-pulse statistics are measured with a boxcar search over an on-pulse phase window, and partial profiles formed by summing pulses above or below signal-to-noise thresholds reveal the phase-energy correlation. Polarization behavior is characterized by measuring rotation measures on individual bright pulses and by inspecting polarization angle curves, with ionospheric rotation-measure contributions estimated and subtracted.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to observe J0031-5726 with a telescope whose polarization calibration is independently verified, or to apply full polarized calibration to the archived voltages, and then compare the single-pulse polarization-angle curves and rotation-measure time series. If the dramatic angle jumps and the roughly $0.8$ rad m$^{-2}$ rotation-measure swings persist in leakage-corrected data, the paper's interpretation is confirmed; if they largely disappear, the claimed behavior is instrumental.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that PSR J0031-5726 is a previously unknown pulsar with spin period $1.570328$ s, dispersion measure $6.755$ pc cm$^{-3}$, and ionosphere-corrected rotation measure $10.0 \pm 0.1$ rad m$^{-2}$, whose single-pulse behavior is unusual: it does not appear to null, yet its pulse energies follow a long-tailed distribution with bright bursts reminiscent of rotating radio transients. The bright pulses cluster on the trailing side of the pulse window while dimmer pulses cluster on the leading side, and the polarization angle curves of the bright pulses vary wildly from pulse to pulse, with sudden roughly $90^\circ$ jumps and no clear rotating-vector-model swing. Averaging these pulses together leaves the integrated profile essentially depolarized down to the noise level. The paper concludes that J0031-5726 may belong to a class intermediate between normal pulsars and RRATs.

Load-bearing premise

The polarization and rotation-measure results assume that instrumental leakage is below about 10 percent and does not vary with time; the calibration used only a total-intensity sky model, so larger or time-variable leakage could produce some of the observed polarization-angle swings, the depolarized profile, and the apparent rotation-measure drift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • J0031-5726 can serve as a probe of the interstellar medium at high Galactic latitude, a direction with few known pulsars.
  • The pulsar demonstrates that image-domain surveys that retain voltage archives can discover and characterize intermittent pulsars without requiring a periodicity search or new telescope time.
  • The brightness-phase correlation implies that pulse intensity and emission geometry are linked, so longer observations can test whether dim and bright pulses form one continuum or two distinct populations.
  • If the measured spin-down rate is refined by a timing campaign, it will determine whether J0031-5726 is an unusually high-field pulsar or, as the authors suspect, a pulsar whose apparent spin-down is overestimated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-brightness correlation reflects a radius-to-brightness mapping, then observations at higher frequencies should see the bright trailing component shift relative to the dim leading component, providing a testable geometric prediction.
  • If the apparent rotation-measure drift is confirmed as intrinsic after full ionospheric correction, it would imply magnetospheric propagation effects that vary between pulses; simultaneous dual-site or ionospheric-total-electron-content monitoring could separate that from ionospheric causes.
  • Similar searches across the full GLEAM-X data release may uncover more objects with this mix of bright and dim single pulses, suggesting that the pulsar-RRAT distinction is a continuum rather than a sharp divide.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of PSR J0031-5726, a 1.570328 s pulsar at DM 6.755 pc cm^-3 found through single-pulse searches in MWA imaging data. The authors identify a long-tailed pulse energy distribution with occasional very bright bursts, show that brighter pulses occur preferentially at later rotation phases than dimmer ones, and present single-pulse polarization measurements that appear to show dramatic pulse-to-pulse PA variations and an almost completely depolarized integrated profile. They also measure an interval of apparent RM variability of up to ~0.8 rad/m^2. The paper concludes that J0031-5726 may be an intermediate object between normal pulsars and RRATs, and emphasizes the value of imaging surveys and archived voltage data for discovering such objects.

Significance. If the polarization and phase-brightness results hold, this is an interesting new object that could inform the relationship between RRAT-like bursting and steady pulsar emission. The discovery itself is solid and demonstrates the effectiveness of image-domain transient searches with the MWA, especially when combined with archival voltage data for follow-up. The authors are appropriately cautious about the provisional spin-down rate and discuss alternative interpretations, which strengthens the paper. However, the most novel quantitative claims in the abstract concern polarization behavior, and these rest on a calibration that the authors acknowledge did not include explicit polarization calibration. The reported leakage bound is not sufficient to exclude instrumental origins for the erratic PA curves, the depolarized average profile, or the RM drift. The central discovery and the phase-energy correlation are likely robust, but the polarization claims need either stronger support or substantial softening before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.4 and §3.2] The polarization results are not sufficiently supported by the calibration. The paper states in §2.4 that only a Stokes I sky model was used and no explicit polarization calibration was performed; leakage was estimated at ≲10% from excess power at zero Faraday depth. This test does not constrain a constant or slowly varying cross-hand phase error, which can rotate Q into U and mimic Faraday rotation, or lead to pulse-dependent PA changes if the error varies with time or frequency. The paper does not report the fractional linear polarization (L/I) of the individual bright pulses, so it is possible that a 10–20% instrumental leakage dominates the PA of pulses with modest intrinsic L/I, producing exactly the erratic PA curves and the nearly depolarized integrated profile described in the abstract. The similar PA shape of two consecutive pulses in Fig. 8 argues against a fixed double-digit offset, but not against a time- or S/N-dependent leakage. Please either perform an explicit polarization calibration (e.g., using a polarized calibrator observation from the MWA archive), present a quantitative leakage model that bounds the cross-hand systematic in the relevant parameter space, or clearly demote the abstract's strong polarization statements to tentative.
  2. [§3.2 and Fig. 3] The claimed RM variability of up to ~0.8 rad/m^2 is also vulnerable to the same uncalibrated cross-hand phase issue, because a cross-hand phase error can distort the RM spectrum and produce apparent RM changes without a clean excess at exactly zero Faraday depth. The argument that the ionosphere cannot be responsible, based on low solar activity and steady ionFR estimates, is indirect and does not rule out small-scale or time-variable ionospheric structure. Please provide direct ionospheric TEC measurements at the times of the individual pulses, or re-label the RM drift as tentative/upper limit and soften the abstract's statement that 'individual pulses was found to sometimes vary by up to ~0.8 rad/m²'.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1 and Fig. 5/6] The S/N thresholds (120, 15, 5, 3.5) used to form partial profiles are described as 'somewhat arbitrary.' The monotonic trend in pulse phase with S/N is visually persuasive, but it would be strengthened by a non-parametric correlation test (e.g., Spearman rank correlation) between pulse S/N and pulse phase. Also, because the penergy boxcar algorithm reports a best-fit phase, it would be useful to demonstrate with injected noise that the phase-S/N correlation is not an artifact of a fitting bias for low-S/N pulses.
  2. [§2.3 and Table 2] The spin-down rate Pdot = (1.5 ± 0.7) × 10^-13 s/s is derived from only two epochs, and the authors themselves argue in §4 that it is likely overestimated. The derived quantities in Table 2 (surface magnetic field, spin-down luminosity, characteristic age) are therefore provisional, and they are presented without error bars. Please include explicit error bars or a clear footnote stating that these quantities depend on the uncertain Pdot.
  3. [References] The in-text citation 'Ord et al. 2019' appears in the reference list as 'Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 36, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2019.17'. The DOI resolves to the Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, not the IAU proceedings. Please correct the journal name in the reference.
  4. [Figure 7 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'all panels share the same the flux scale' should read 'the same flux scale'. Also, the statement that 'the abscissa is shifted by -0.5 phase units relative to Figs. 1 and 5' is confusing; please clarify the reference phase in the caption or the figure itself.
  5. [Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), the symbol ΔTEC is used both as a total electron content change and, in the preceding sentence, as a rate of change (TECU/min). Please clarify the time interval over which the RM change is computed, since the Pi et al. (1997) example of 10 TECU/min needs a time duration to yield a meaningful ΔRM.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pulsar discovery and its measured properties are independent of any fitted input or self-citation chain.

full rationale

This is an observational discovery paper. The period, DM, RM, pulse-phase statistics, and single-pulse polarization curves of PSR J0031-5726 are measured directly from 2016 and 2018 VCS data and the 2020 GLEAM-X correlator observation using standard, externally maintained tools (PRESTO, DSPSR, PSRSALSA, PSRCHIVE, ionFR). No quantity is fitted to a subset of data and then presented as a prediction of the same or a closely related quantity. The derived quantities such as distance, surface magnetic field, spin-down luminosity, and characteristic age are explicitly model-dependent and flagged as uncertain; in particular, the paper argues that the measured spindown rate is likely overestimated, which is a stated limitation rather than a self-supporting conclusion. Self-citations appear mainly for data provenance and survey context (GLEAM-X, MWA VCS processing, hyperdrive) and do not supply a uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted parameter that the central claim depends on. The Stokes-I-only polarization calibration and the estimated <=10% leakage are acknowledged robustness limitations of the polarimetric interpretation, not circular reductions: the leakage estimate is an independent diagnostic tied to excess power at zero Faraday depth, and the discovery, periodicity, and phase-energy correlation do not reduce by construction to that estimate. Accordingly, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This paper is an observational discovery; its central claims rest on standard pulsar search and analysis software, on the accuracy of MWA calibration and ionospheric RM correction, and on manual analysis choices for RFI flagging and S/N thresholds. No new physical entities are introduced, and derived quantities such as distance and characteristic age are explicitly model-dependent.

free parameters (5)
  • Spin period = 1.570328(1) s
    Fitted by pdmp/PRESTO from two VCS observations; required to fold and phase-align pulses.
  • Dispersion measure = 6.755(32) pc cm^-3
    Fitted by PRESTO; required for dedispersion of single pulses and timing.
  • Spin-down rate Pdot = (1.5 +/- 0.7) x 10^-13 s/s
    Derived from only two period measurements; the paper notes possible systematic error from the energy-phase correlation.
  • Ionospheric RM correction = -0.9 +/- 0.1 rad/m^2
    Taken from the ionFR model rather than measured; used to derive RM_ISM = 10.0 rad/m^2.
  • S/N thresholds for partial profiles = 120, 15, 5, 3.5
    Chosen somewhat arbitrarily to define bright and dim pulse subsets; the fitted profile centers in Fig. 6 depend on these thresholds.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard pulsar search and folding software (PRESTO, DSPSR, PSRCHIVE) correctly identify and characterize the periodic signal.
    The paper relies on established tools without independent verification of their outputs on this specific source.
  • domain assumption The ionospheric RM contribution estimated by ionFR is accurate at the time of observation.
    The quoted RM_ISM of 10.0 rad/m^2 is obtained by subtracting the ionFR model value from the measured RM.
  • domain assumption The MWA voltage calibration and beam model are accurate enough for full Stokes single-pulse analysis.
    Calibration used only a Stokes I sky model, so cross-polarization phase and beam model inaccuracies can introduce leakage between Stokes parameters.
  • domain assumption The electron density models NE2001 and YMW16 are applicable along this high-latitude line of sight.
    The distance estimates of 0.37 and 0.59 kpc depend on these models; the authors estimate about 40 percent uncertainty by comparing with 33 nearby pulsars.
  • domain assumption The on-pulse and off-pulse phase ranges, and the manual RFI flagging, do not systematically bias the pulse statistics.
    The analysis uses a hand-defined on-pulse window and manual rejection of 137 pulses; if these choices correlate with pulse phase or brightness, the phase-brightness correlation could be affected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of an RRAT-like pulsar via its single pulses in an MWA imaging survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q2ST7CNR

@misc{pith2026250202130,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of an RRAT-like pulsar via its single pulses in an MWA imaging survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q2ST7CNR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02130}
}
abstract

We report the discovery of PSR J0031$-$5726 in the GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky MWA eXtended imaging survey at a Galactic latitude of $b \approx -60^\circ$. The pulsar exhibits both sporadic, extremely bright pulses reminiscent of rotating radio transients (RRATs) as well as a persistent, dimmer pulses. The bright pulses tend to arrive at later rotation phases than their dimmer counterparts, and have dramatically varying polarization angle curves, such that the integrated profile appears almost completely depolarized down to the system noise level. The rotation measure of individual pulses was found to sometimes vary by up to ${\sim}0.8\,$rad/m$^2$, but was otherwise generally consistent with its average (ionosphere-corrected) value of $10.0 \pm 0.1\,$rad/m$^2$. We surmise that J0031$-$5726 may represent a class of pulsar that is intermediate between normal pulsars and RRATs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02130 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A portion of the pulse stack (bot￾tom panel) from the 2018-10-22 observation of J0031−5726, with ∼3 ms time resolution. The pro￾file (top panel) is formed from the whole ∼80 min observation, not just the portion shown in the puls￾estack. The phase has been manually aligned such that the pulse phase of 0.5 occurs at the peak of the profile. In order to make some of the relatively dim pulses visible, the color scale w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spin period against spin period deriva￾tive for all known pulsars (Manchester et al. 2005) with the addition of the newly discovered J0031−5726. The known pulsars are reported by the Australia Telescope National Facility, catalog version 2.0.1 (Manchester et al. 2005). The dashed lines correspond to the theoretical death lines for a pure dipole and the dotted lines for twisted dipole (Zhang et al. 2000; Chen & Ruder… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. RM measured for a selection of the brightest individual pulses. The dashed horizon￾tal line is the weighted average, RMmeas = 9.15 ± 0.04 rad/m2 . The variability of RM over the course of the observation is apparently real, and larger than seen in other pulsars. Whether it could be ionospheric in origin or intrinsic to the source is discussed in §3.2. “nulls” still contain a significant and detectable pulsar signal.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The distribution of pulse energies (blue) in the 2018 VCS observation, where the pulse en￾ergy is the integrated flux density over the esti￾mated pulse window size of 0.08 P. The high energy tail is not well fit by a Gaussian, indicative of the inapplicability of the G…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The top panel shows the individual pulse S/Ns as a function of pulse phase, as deter￾mined by PSRSALSA’s penergy utility. The hori￾zontal lines drawn at S/Ns of 120, 15, 5, and 3.5 represent the maximal (middle panel) and minimal (bottom panel) thresholds used to form …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The fitted centers of Lorentzian fits to the partial profiles shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A selection of polarization profiles of some of the bright pulses in the 2018 observation. In each subplot, the polarization angle is shown in top panel, with the total intensity (black), linear polarization (red), and circular polarization (blue) shown in the bottom p…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The Galactic position of PSR J0031- 5726 (black star) amongst the known pulsar popu￾lation (blue dots). vations would yield an independent distance es￾timate, that could then constrain the electron density along the line-of-sight to this direction. Both electron densit…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Southern-sky MWA Rapid Two-metre (SMART) pulsar survey--IV. Survey update and an atlas of 205 non-recycled southern pulsars

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Atlas of 205 non-recycled southern pulsars at 140–170 MHz from MWA SMART data, with profiles, DMs, RMs, fluxes and public data products for SKA-Low.

  2. Commensal image plane transient search methods with the SKAO

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 accept novelty 3.5 of 10

    State-of-the-art pathfinder techniques for fast model-subtracted imaging, automated light-curve pipelines, artefact filtering and triggered reprocessing enable reliable commensal image-plane transient searches with SK...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A Pilot Study of Nulling in 22 Pulsars Using Mixture Modeling

    Anumarlapudi, A., Swiggum, J. K., Kaplan, D. L., & Fichtenbauer, T. D. J. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13258

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Backer, D. C. 1970, Nature, 228, 42, doi: 10.1038/228042a0

    doi:10.1038/228042a0 1970

  3. [3]

    E., Murphy, T., Hancock, P

    Bell, M. E., Murphy, T., Hancock, P. J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2484, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2801

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2801 2019

  4. [4]

    Bhat, N. D. R., Tingay, S. J., & Knight, H. S. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 676, 1200, doi: 10.1086/528735

    doi:10.1086/528735 2008

  5. [5]

    Bhat, N. D. R., Swainston, N. A., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, PASA, 40, e021, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2023.17

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2023.17 2023

  6. [6]

    M., & Wasserman, I

    Blaskiewicz, M., Cordes, J. M., & Wasserman, I. 1991, ApJ, 370, 643, doi: 10.1086/169850

    doi:10.1086/169850 1991

  7. [7]

    1993, ApJ, 402, 264, doi: 10.1086/172129

    Chen, K., & Ruderman, M. 1993, ApJ, 402, 264, doi: 10.1086/172129

    doi:10.1086/172129 1993

  8. [8]

    Cordes, J. M. 1978, ApJ, 222, 1006, doi: 10.1086/156218

    doi:10.1086/156218 1978

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    M., & Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0207156 15

    2002 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    M., Weisberg, J

    Cordes, J. M., Weisberg, J. M., & Boriakoff, V. 1985, ApJ, 288, 221, doi: 10.1086/162784

    1985 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Crowter, K., Meyers, B

    Dong, F. A., Crowter, K., Meyers, B. W., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 5132, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2012

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    D., & Craft, H

    Drake, F. D., & Craft, H. D. 1968, Nature, 220, 231, doi: 10.1038/220231a0

    1968 doi

  5. [13]

    Dyks, J., Rudak, B., & Harding, A. K. 2004, ApJ, 607, 939, doi: 10.1086/383587

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    D., & Moffet, A

    Ekers, R. D., & Moffet, A. T. 1969, ApJL, 158, L1, doi: 10.1086/180419

    1969 doi

  7. [15]

    Niu, H. B. 2012, ApJL, 759, L3, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/759/1/L3

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Ray, P

    Frail, D. A., Ray, P. S., Mooley, K. P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 942, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3281

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    C., Andersen, B

    Good, D. C., Andersen, B. C., Chawla, P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1da6

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Grover, G., Bhat, N. D. R., & McSweeney, S. J. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.03806, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.03806

    doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Grover, G., Bhat, N. D. R., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 970, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad509e

    doi

  12. [20]

    F., Yan, Y., & Zhou, D

    Guo, Q., Kong, M., Wang, P. F., Yan, Y., & Zhou, D. J. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 530, 2433, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae973

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Hankins, T. H. 1971, ApJ, 169, 487, doi: 10.1086/151164

    1971 doi

  14. [22]

    W., Straten, W

    Hotan, A. W., Straten, W. V., & Manchester, R. N. 2004, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 21, 302, doi: 10.1071/AS04022

    2004 doi

  15. [23]

    A., Jiang, J

    Hsu, J. A., Jiang, J. C., Xu, H., Lee, K. J., & Xu, R. X. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 1418, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3094

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Hurley-Walker, N., & Hancock, P. J. 2018, Astronomy and Computing, 25, 94, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2018.08.006

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Duchesne, S

    Hurley-Walker, N., Galvin, T. J., Duchesne, S. W., et al. 2022a, PASA, 39, e035, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.17

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    2022b, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    Hurley-Walker, N., Zhang, X., Bahramian, A., et al. 2022b, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    doi

  19. [27]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Bahramian, A., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., McSweeney, S. J., Bahramian, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.15757, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15757

    2024 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    D., Johnston, S., & Weltevrede, P

    Ilie, C. D., Johnston, S., & Weltevrede, P. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2778, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3315

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 4565, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2865

    Johnston, S., & Kramer, M. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4565, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2865

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Johnston, S., & Romani, R. W. 2004, in Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments, ed. F. Camilo & B. M. Gaensler, Vol. 218, 315

    2004

  24. [32]

    L., Swiggum, J

    Kaplan, D. L., Swiggum, J. K., Fichtenbauer, T. D. J., & Vallisneri, M. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 855, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab62

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    A., & Ord, S

    McLaughlin, M. A., & Ord, S. M. 2009, MNRAS, 396, L95, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00671.x

    2009

  26. [34]

    J., Jameson, A., van Straten, W., et al

    Keith, M. J., Jameson, A., van Straten, W., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 619, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17325.x

    2010

  27. [35]

    S., Bailes, M., Manchester, R

    Knight, H. S., Bailes, M., Manchester, R. N., Ord, S. M., & Jacoby, B. A. 2006, ApJ, 640, 941, doi: 10.1086/500292

    2006 doi

  28. [36]

    2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 40, 42, doi: 10.1007/s12036-019-9608-z

    Konar, S., & Deka, U. 2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 40, 42, doi: 10.1007/s12036-019-9608-z

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    2003, A&A, 407, 655, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030842

    Kramer, M., Karastergiou, A., Gupta, Y., et al. 2003, A&A, 407, 655, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030842

    2003 doi

  30. [38]

    D., & Ershov, A

    Kuzmin, A. D., & Ershov, A. A. 2004, A&A, 427, 575, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035904

    2004 doi

  31. [39]

    R., Kaplan, D

    Lenc, E., Murphy, T., Lynch, C. R., Kaplan, D. L., & Zhang, S. N. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2835, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1304

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    2005, AJ, 129, 1993, doi: 10.1086/428488

    Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993, doi: 10.1086/428488

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    N., Taylor, J

    Manchester, R. N., Taylor, J. H., & Huguenin, G. R. 1975, ApJ, 196, 83, doi: 10.1086/153395

    1975 doi

  34. [42]

    N., Lyne, A

    Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G., Camilo, F., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 17, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04751.x

    2001

  35. [43]

    2021, Space Weather, 19, e2020SW002641, doi: 10.1029/2020SW002641

    Matzka, J., Stolle, C., Yamazaki, Y., Bronkalla, O., & Morschhauser, A. 2021, Space Weather, 19, e2020SW002641, doi: 10.1029/2020SW002641

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    J., et al

    Mauch, T., Murphy, T., Buttery, H. J., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1117, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06605.x 16

    2003

  37. [45]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 4397, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2900

    McCauley, J. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 4397, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2900

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    A., Lyne, A

    McLaughlin, M. A., Lyne, A. G., Lorimer, D. R., et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 817, doi: 10.1038/nature04440

    2006 doi

  39. [47]

    A., Greenhill, L

    Mitchell, D. A., Greenhill, L. J., Wayth, R. B., et al. 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 707, doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2005327

    2008

  40. [48]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/28

    Mitra, D., Basu, R., Maciesiak, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/28

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    S., Macquart, J

    Morgan, J. S., Macquart, J. P., Chhetri, R., et al. 2019, PASA, 36, e002, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2018.40

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    L., et al

    Murphy, T., Chatterjee, S., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2013, PASA, 30, e006, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2012.006

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    Ofek, E. O. 2009, PASP, 121, 814, doi: 10.1086/605389

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444, 606, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1368

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Tremblay, S

    Ord, S. M., Tremblay, S. E., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2019, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 36, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2019.17

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    J., Lindqwister, U

    Pi, X., Mannucci, A. J., Lindqwister, U. J., & Ho, C. M. 1997, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2283, doi: 10.1029/97GL02273

    1997 doi

  47. [55]

    C., Flynn, C., & Deller, A

    Price, D. C., Flynn, C., & Deller, A. 2021, PASA, 38, e038, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.33

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Radhakrishnan, V., & Cooke, D. J. 1969, Astrophys. Lett., 3, 225

    1969

  49. [57]

    2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017

    Ransom, S. 2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017. http://ascl.net/1107.017

    2011

  50. [58]

    Ransom, S. M. 2001, New search techniques for binary pulsars. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/ abs/2001PhDT.......123R

    2001

  51. [59]

    Ritchings, R. T. 1976, MNRAS, 176, 249, doi: 10.1093/mnras/176.2.249

    1976 doi

  52. [60]

    J., et al

    Ross, K., Hurley-Walker, N., Galvin, T. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.06921, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.06921

    2024 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    A., Tyul’bashev, S

    Samodurov, V. A., Tyul’bashev, S. A., Toropov, M. O., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.00845, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.00845

    2023 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    Sett, S., Bhat, N. D. R., Sokolowski, M., & Lenc, E. 2023, PASA, 40, e003, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.59

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    T., et al

    Sokolowski, M., Colegate, T., Sutinjo, A. T., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e062, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.54

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    Sotomayor-Beltran, C., Sobey, C., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220728

    2013 doi

  57. [65]

    H., & Reifenstein, Edward C., I

    Staelin, D. H., & Reifenstein, Edward C., I. 1968, Science, 162, 1481, doi: 10.1126/science.162.3861.1481

    1968

  58. [66]

    J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J

    Tingay, S. J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J. D., et al. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 30, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2012.007 van Straten, W., & Bailes, M. 2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 28, 1, doi: 10.1071/AS10021

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    2016, A&A, 590, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527950

    Weltevrede, P. 2016, A&A, 590, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527950

    2016 doi

  60. [68]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29

    2017 doi

  61. [69]

    K., & Muslimov, A

    Zhang, B., Harding, A. K., & Muslimov, A. G. 2000, ApJL, 531, L135, doi: 10.1086/312542

    2000 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.