Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Photo-induced Dynamics and Momentum Distribution of Chiral Charge Density Waves in 1T-TiSe$_{2}$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Circularly polarized light acts differently on the two chiral charge-density-wave domains of 1T-TiSe2, and time-resolved X-ray diffraction can see the difference.

desk verdict New and real: helicity-dependent tr-XRD on the TiSe2 CDW peak shows a statistically solid ~20% LCP/RCP asymmetry, but the momentum-resolved chirality map is only as good as an uncalibrated sign-to-handedness mapping, and the key control is in a missing supplementary note. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02314 v1 pith:Q3QUCPCG submitted 2025-02-04 cond-mat.str-el

Qingzheng Qiu , Sae Hwan Chun , Jaeku Park , Dogeun Jang , Li Yue , Yeongkwan Kim , Yeojin Ahn , Mingi Jho
show 9 more authors
Kimoon Han Xinyi Jiang Qian Xiao Tao Dong Jia-Yi Ji Nanlin Wang Jeroen van den Brink Jasper van Wezel Yingying Peng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords chargedensitywavechiralitycirculardichroismtime-resolvedX-raydiffraction1T-TiSe2photoinduceddynamicschiraldomainscorrelationlength
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using time-resolved X-ray diffraction with left- and right-circularly polarized 800 nm pump pulses, this paper tries to show that the charge density wave in 1T-TiSe2 is coupled to chirality in an optically addressable way. The authors find that left-circularly polarized light suppresses the CDW superlattice peak roughly 20% more than right-circularly polarized light of the same fluence, with the asymmetry already present in the fast recovery channel. They define a momentum-resolved circular dichroism $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}(q,t) = (I_{\mathrm{rc}}-I_{\mathrm{lc}})/(I_{\mathrm{rc}}+I_{\mathrm{lc}})$, find it is spatially inhomogeneous, and read the negative sign at a mosaic peak as evidence of an opposite-chirality grain. They also observe that the CDW correlation length increases within 200 fs of pumping, with a helicity-dependent recovery, which they connect to photoinduced domain expansion or defect annealing. If these claims hold, the experiment provides a momentum-resolved, time-resolved probe of chirality and suggests a concrete optical route to chiral-domain control.

What carries the argument

The central observable is the momentum-resolved relative circular dichroism $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}(q,t) = (I_{\mathrm{rc}}(q,t)-I_{\mathrm{lc}}(q,t))/(I_{\mathrm{rc}}(q,t)+I_{\mathrm{lc}}(q,t))$, computed from X-ray diffraction intensities after right- and left-circularly polarized pump pulses; its sign pattern is used to identify chiral domains. The measurement uses Ti-K edge 4.96 keV X-ray pulses in grazing incidence with an 800 nm pump whose polarization is switched by a quarter-wave plate. To separate intrinsic order from instrumental and thermal broadening, the CDW peak profile is fitted with a Voigt function, and the transient narrowing of the Lorentzian HWHM is interpreted as an increase in CDW correlation length. The mosaic peak adjacent to the main reflection acts as the internal control: its opposite $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}$ sign is the key evidence that the signal tracks crystallographic chirality rather than a global artifact.

What would settle it

Independently measure the chirality of the mosaic grain with a structurally chiral-sensitive probe (STM or resonant X-ray scattering on the same grain) and check whether its handedness is opposite to the main lattice; if it is not, the momentum-resolved CD interpretation fails. A complementary control is to verify that the CD signal disappears under a linearly polarized pump of the same fluence, as asserted in Supplementary Note 8.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that illumination with circularly polarized 800 nm light acts differently on the two chiral domains of the $2\times2\times2$ CDW in 1T-TiSe2, and that this difference is directly visible in momentum-resolved X-ray diffraction. Specifically, left-circularly polarized pump pulses suppress the $(1/2,1/2,1/2)$ CDW diffraction peak more strongly than right-circularly polarized pulses at equal fluence, with fitted fast and slow suppression amplitudes in the ratio LCP/RCP $\approx 1.2$ and a total intensity-suppression difference near 20%. The relative circular dichroism $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}(q,t)$ is not uniform across the peak: positive values dominate the main reflection, while a nearby mosaic peak shows a negative value, interpreted as a grain of opposite chirality. In addition, the Lorentzian component of the CDW peak profile narrows within 200 fs of pumping, meaning the correlation length increases, and the recovery of this narrowing depends on pump helicity. The paper concludes that left- and right-handed chiral CDW domains coexist in equilibrium and that circularly polarized pumping can preferentially quench, anneal, or expand one handedness, providing an explanation for earlier chiral-training observations.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on assuming that the sign of $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}(q,t)$ at a given momentum directly reports the handedness of the chiral domain that scatters there; the opposite sign at the mosaic peak is taken as proof of an opposite-chirality grain, but no independent measurement confirms that grain's chirality, and the control for grazing-incidence linear-polarization artifacts is deferred to Supplementary Note 8, which is not included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coexisting left- and right-handed chiral CDW domains exist in equilibrium 1T-TiSe2, with one handedness slightly favored by defects or strain, which accounts for the dominant positive $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}$ sign.
  • Circularly polarized ultrafast pulses can selectively act on one chiral-domain population, so high-repetition-rate trains of pulses could stabilize, expand, or switch domain balance—an optical route to chirality training in a quantum material.
  • Because the circular dichroism already appears in the fast recovery component and disappears at about 500 ps while the lattice is still heated, the underlying mechanism is likely screening by photogenerated carriers rather than a slow structural rearrangement.
  • The helicity-dependent increase in CDW correlation length implies that ultrafast pumping anneals topological defects or expands chiral domains, tying defect dynamics to the chiral order.
  • Time-resolved X-ray diffraction with circularly polarized pumps constitutes a momentum-resolved chirality probe whose signal is about 20%, far larger than the sub-1% circular dichroism seen in optical reflectivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sign of $\Delta_{\mathrm{CD}}(q,t)$ truly tracks domain handedness, then mapping this quantity across the full diffraction peak provides a way to image chiral-domain textures and their ultrafast evolution, a capability the paper demonstrates but does not develop into a full imaging method.
  • The large amplification from sub-1% optical CD to a 20% diffraction-suppression difference suggests a self-amplifying carrier-screening mechanism; measuring how the LCP/RCP suppression ratio scales with fluence and with temperature near the CDW transition would test that amplification directly.
  • The helicity-dependent correlation-length recovery time longer than 100 ps hints at slow topological-defect or domain-wall dynamics; extending delay measurements well beyond 500 ps could reveal whether the photoinduced chirality imbalance fully relaxes or leaves a metastable trained state.
  • Because the mosaic peak provides an internal sign-reversal control, the same tr-XRD protocol could be applied to other CDW or ordered materials suspected of harboring chiral domains, offering a general momentum-resolved chirality assay.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved X-ray diffraction measurements on the chiral charge density wave (CDW) in 1T-TiSe2, comparing the CDW (1/2,1/2,1/2) peak response under left- and right-circularly polarized 800 nm pump pulses. It claims a ~20% helicity-dependent suppression of the CDW intensity, with fitted fast and slow amplitudes in Table I giving an LCP/RCP ratio of about 1.2. A momentum-resolved map of the relative circular dichroism ΔCD(q,t) shows positive values over most of the peak, but a negative region at a mosaic peak, which the authors interpret as evidence of an opposite-chirality domain. The paper further reports a pump-induced increase in CDW correlation length, extracted from Voigt fits to the peak profile, and proposes that circularly polarized pumping anneals topological defects or expands chiral domains. The authors conclude that the experiment provides a momentum-resolved, time-resolved link between CDW order and chirality and a new tool for chirality detection.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, this is a substantial advance: it would demonstrate that circularly polarized X-ray-visible pump-probe experiments can sense and spatially map chiral CDW domains, complementing STM and optical CPGE studies and offering a route to ultrafast chirality control. The paper has real strengths: the LCP/RCP difference in the fitted amplitudes is statistically significant, the X-ray probe avoids direct pump interference, and the authors include controls such as equal absorption of LCP and RCP and the disappearance of the difference at 500 ps. The momentum-resolved ΔCD map is an original dataset. However, the paper's main claim—that the sign of ΔCD directly encodes domain handedness—is not calibrated, and a key polarization control is deferred to an absent Supplementary Note. The result is therefore plausible but not yet established at the level of the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Fig. 2b, and paragraph beginning 'The origin of CD can be further clarified'] The central interpretive step is the assumption that the sign of ΔCD(q,t) at a given momentum encodes the handedness of the chiral domain that scatters there. No independent calibration of this sign-to-handedness mapping is provided. The only evidence offered for the mapping is the negative ΔCD at the mosaic peak (Region III), which is then declared to be a 'mosaic block consisting of predominantly opposite chiral domains' and is said to 'add credence' to the observation. This reasoning is circular: the mosaic grain's chirality is inferred from the sign of ΔCD, and the sign is then treated as confirmed by the existence of an opposite-chirality grain. The authors should either provide an independent determination of the mosaic grain's chirality (for example, STM or CPGE on the same grain), a model calculation of the expected ΔCD sign for a given structural chirality, or a calibration of the mapping on a sample of known handedness. Without one of these, the momentum-resolved ΔCD map does not establish a link between CDW order and chirality.
  2. [Experimental setup and the statement 'Due to the grazing incidence configuration...'] The claim that the residual linearly polarized component acquired at grazing incidence 'does not affect our conclusions about circular dichroism' is deferred to Supplementary Note 8, which is not included in the manuscript under review. This control is load-bearing because the experiment uses an incidence angle of approximately 1°. A mosaic grain with a slightly different surface orientation will see a different local pump ellipticity and a different projection of the photon angular momentum onto the local scattering vector; a sufficiently large misorientation could reverse the effective helicity in the grain frame and produce a negative ΔCD without any chirality difference. The authors need to include the polarization analysis and, ideally, data at variable incidence angle or azimuth, or a quantitative bound on the grain misorientation, to show that the local effective helicity is the same for the main and mosaic grains.
  3. [Supplementary Notes 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8; Table I and Fig. 3] Several quantitative claims rest on supplementary material that is referenced but absent from the preprint: the equal-absorption control (Note 2), the correlation-correction procedure for the ΔCD map (Note 4), the individual-measurement inhomogeneity (Note 5), the Voigt fitting procedure (Note 6), and the grazing-incidence polarization control (Note 8). Without these, the reported fitting uncertainties in Table I, the validity of the ΔCD map, and the correlation-length analysis cannot be independently assessed. The authors should provide the full supplementary material, or move the essential controls and fitting details into the main text, before the claims can be evaluated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The parameter τd is called the 'decay time' but it enters through an error-function factor describing the pump-induced rise of the suppression; rename it 'rise time' or define it explicitly to avoid confusion.
  2. [Table I and the text following it] The statement 'A1,lc/A1,rc ≈ A2,lc/A2,rc ≈ 1.2' does not propagate the statistical uncertainties from Table I; the ratio of 0.077±0.005 to 0.061±0.010 carries considerable uncertainty, and the claim that even the fast process carries the CD signal should be quantified with a confidence interval.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption and the paragraph on correlation length] There is a typo in 'HWHW of Gaussian' and 'HWHW of Lorentz'; these should read 'HWHM'.
  4. [Discussion, paragraph on chiral domains] The phrase 'a higher population of photo dissipaters' is undefined and awkward; it would be clearer to say 'photogenerated carriers' or 'dissipative channels'.
  5. [Fig. 1c–h and the 500 ps control] The claim that the CD disappears around 500 ps is inferred from overlap at a few fixed delay points, while the text also says the system has not fully relaxed; clarify whether the overlap indicates equal absorbed energy or merely similar transient states at that delay.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Mosaic-peak validation of the chirality interpretation is circular: opposite chirality is inferred from the ΔCD sign, then cited as confirming that ΔCD measures chirality.

  1. self definitional [Main text, section 'The origin of CD' (Fig. 2b-2e) and Discussion]
    "This mosaic block consists of predominantly opposite chiral domains and leads to an opposite circular dichroism sign from the main lattice. ... Notably, the negative CD shown in Fig. 2e, in contrast to the dominant positive CD, is detected at a mosaic peak arising from another grain. The detection of a grain exhibiting opposing chirality within the same measurement adds credence to the observed phenomenon."

    The mosaic grain's 'opposing chirality' is not independently measured; it is inferred solely from the negative sign of ΔCD=(Irc-Ilc)/(Irc+Ilc). The same inferred chirality is then presented as independent support for the claim that the ΔCD sign encodes handedness. This is circular: the observation (negative ΔCD) is interpreted using the hypothesis (sign = chirality) and then counted as confirmation of that hypothesis. The Discussion repeats the move, excluding fluence artifacts because they 'fail to account for the observed mosaic peaks with opposite chirality'—again using the uncalibrated sign-to-chirality inference as evidence.

full rationale

The central measurements—the ~20% LCP/RCP difference in CDW suppression and the inhomogeneous ΔCD map—are direct experimental observations, not fitted parameters relabeled as predictions, and they are self-contained against the data. No fitted quantity from Table I is presented as a prediction, and the correlation-length analysis is a standard profile fit. The paper does cite prior chiral-CDW work by coauthors (refs 7 and 10), but the main result does not reduce to those citations; they supply context and a proposed mechanism, not a forced derivation. The one genuine circular step is the mosaic-peak validation: the opposite chirality of the mosaic grain is inferred from the negative ΔCD sign, then used to 'add credence' to the sign-to-chirality mapping. That is a secondary interpretive argument, so the paper is only partially circular rather than wholly constructed. The deferred Supplementary Note 8 on grazing-incidence polarization control is an evidentiary gap that weakens the chirality claim, but it is not itself circularity; it makes the sign-to-handedness mapping uncalibrated and aggravates the circular validation step.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The empirical claims are not derived from first principles; they rest on standard pump-probe formalism and on several interpretive assumptions about chiral domains, helicity-dependent carrier excitation, and Voigt line-shape decomposition. The main free parameters are the phenomenological fit parameters in Eq. (1) and the Voigt profile widths that define the reported CD and correlation-length changes. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)
  • A1_RCP = 0.061 ± 0.010
    Fast recovery amplitude in Eq. (1) fitted to the RCP CDW intensity transient. It participates in the reported circular dichroism ratio.
  • A2_RCP = 0.094 ± 0.003
    Slow recovery amplitude in Eq. (1) fitted to the RCP transient. This is the largest contributor to the reported circular dichroism.
  • tau_r_RCP = 0.61 ± 0.15 ps
    Fast recovery time fitted to the RCP transient in Eq. (1).
  • A1_LCP = 0.077 ± 0.005
    Fast recovery amplitude in Eq. (1) fitted to the LCP transient.
  • A2_LCP = 0.114 ± 0.003
    Slow recovery amplitude in Eq. (1) fitted to the LCP transient. The LCP/RCP ratio of these amplitudes is the basis for the ~20% CD claim.
  • tau_r_LCP = 1.01 ± 0.14 ps
    Fast recovery time fitted to the LCP transient in Eq. (1).
  • tau_d = not reported in Table I
    Rise time parameter in Eq. (1). The paper does not list its fitted value, which is a minor gap in reporting the CD dynamics.
  • Voigt Lorentzian HWHM (RCP and LCP)
    Time-dependent Lorentzian widths extracted from Voigt fits in Fig. 3d. The decrease in HWHM is the evidence for the correlation-length increase claim.
  • Voigt Gaussian HWHM (RCP and LCP)
    Time-dependent Gaussian widths extracted from the same Voigt fits. They are used to separate thermal and instrumental broadening from intrinsic correlation length.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 1T-TiSe2 at equilibrium contains coexisting left- and right-handed chiral CDW domains.
    Invoked in the discussion of Fig. 2 to interpret positive and negative ΔCD regions as opposite chiral domains. It is based on prior STM and theory, not measured independently in the X-ray experiment.
  • domain assumption Circularly polarized pump light excites a different density of carriers in domains of opposite chirality, leading to helicity-dependent CDW suppression.
    Adopted from CPGE results (refs 11 and 17) and used as the screening mechanism for the observed CD. No microscopic model is derived here.
  • domain assumption The Voigt profile separates Gaussian broadening (instrumental and thermal) from Lorentzian broadening (intrinsic lattice and correlation length), so Lorentzian narrowing equals correlation length growth.
    This standard lineshape decomposition is the basis for the correlation-length claim. Its validity for this specific data set is not independently demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper The residual linearly polarized component from grazing incidence does not affect the LCP/RCP comparison.
    Stated in the main text and deferred to Supplementary Note 8, which is absent from the preprint. If false, the asymmetry could be a polarization artifact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photo-induced Dynamics and Momentum Distribution of Chiral Charge Density Waves in 1T-TiSe$_{2}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q3QUCPCG

@misc{pith2026250202314,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photo-induced Dynamics and Momentum Distribution of Chiral Charge Density Waves in 1T-TiSe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q3QUCPCG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02314}
}
abstract

Exploring the photoinduced dynamics of chiral states offers promising avenues for advanced control of condensed matter systems. Photoinduced or photoenhanced chirality in 1T-TiSe$_{2}$ has been suggested as a fascinating platform for optical manipulation of chiral states. However, the mechanisms underlying chirality training and its interplay with the charge density wave (CDW) phase remain elusive. Here, we use time-resolved X-ray diffraction (tr-XRD) with circularly polarized pump lasers to probe the photoinduced dynamics of chirality in 1T-TiSe$_{2}$. We observe a notable ($\sim$20%) difference in CDW intensity suppression between left- and right-circularly polarized pumps. Additionally, we reveal momentum-resolved circular dichroism arising from domains of different chirality, providing a direct link between CDW and chirality. An immediate increase in CDW correlation length upon laser pumping is detected, suggesting the photoinduced expansion of chiral domains. These results both advance the potential of light-driven chirality by elucidating the mechanism driving chirality manipulation in TiSe$_2$, and they demonstrate that tr-XRD with circularly polarized pumps is an effective tool for chirality detection in condensed matter systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02314 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b. The temporal evolution of CDW intensity is traced by integrating the intensities around the CDW regions at different time delays. Within 100 fs after the laser pump, the diffraction intensity rapidly decreases, followed by a fast recovery process; the system enters a quasi-equilibrium state subsequently, during which no significant recovery is observed within the maximum de￾lay time. Remarkably, despite identical… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Zhou, S

    Bao, C., Tang, P., Sun, D. & Zhou, S. Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2d materials and topological ma- terials. Nat. Rev. Phys 4, 33–48 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    H.On chirality and the universal asymme- try: reflections on image and mirror image (John Wiley & Sons, 2007)

    Wagni` ere, G. H.On chirality and the universal asymme- try: reflections on image and mirror image (John Wiley & Sons, 2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Li, G. et al. Chirality locking charge density waves in a chiral crystal. Nat. Commun. 13, 2914 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    & Yang, F

    Liu, C.-C., Zhang, L.-D., Chen, W.-Q. & Yang, F. Chiral spin density wave and d + id superconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Romao, C. P. & Juraschek, D. M. Phonon-induced geo- metric chirality. ACS nano 18, 29550–29557 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Zeng, Z. et al. Breaking symmetry with light: photo- induced chirality in a non-chiral crystal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08491 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Chirality and orbital order in charge den- sity waves

    van Wezel, J. Chirality and orbital order in charge den- sity waves. EPL 96, 67011 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    & Raghu, S

    Hosur, P., Kapitulnik, A., Kivelson, S., Orenstein, J. & Raghu, S. Kerr effect as evidence of gyrotropic order in the cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115116 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Parity-breaking phases of spin-orbit-coupled met- als with gyrotropic, ferroelectric, and multipolar orders

    Fu, L. Parity-breaking phases of spin-orbit-coupled met- als with gyrotropic, ferroelectric, and multipolar orders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026401 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Xiao, Q. et al. Observation of giant circular dichroism induced by electronic chirality. arXiv 2312.11961 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Spontaneous gyrotropic electronic order in a transition-metal dichalcogenide. Nature 578, 545– 549 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Ishioka, J. et al. Chiral charge-density waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 176401 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Castellan, J.-P. et al. Chiral phase transition in charge ordered 1T-TiSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 196404 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    chiral phase transition in charge ordered 1T-TiSe2

    Lin, M.-K., Hlevyack, J. A., Chen, P., Liu, R.-Y. & Chi- ang, T.-C. Comment on “chiral phase transition in charge ordered 1T-TiSe2”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 229701 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Hildebrand, B. et al. Local real-space view of the achiral 1T-TiSe2 2×2×2 charge density wave. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 136404 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Ueda, H. et al. Correlation between electronic and struc- tural orders in 1T-TiSe 2. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L022003 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Jog, H. et al. Optically induced symmetry breaking due to nonequilibrium steady state formation in charge den- sity wave material 1T-TiSe 2. Nano Lett. 23, 9634–9640 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Nonthermal melting of a charge density wave in TiSe 2

    M¨ ohr-Vorobeva, E.et al. Nonthermal melting of a charge density wave in TiSe 2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036403 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Burian, M. et al. Structural involvement in the melting of the charge density wave in 1T-TiSe 2. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013128 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Rohwer, T. et al. Collapse of long-range charge or- der tracked by time-resolved photoemission at high mo- menta. Nature 471, 490–493 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Porer, M. et al. Non-thermal separation of electronic and structural orders in a persisting charge density wave.Nat. Mater. 13, 857–861 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Mathias, S. et al. Self-amplified photo-induced gap quenching in a correlated electron material. Nat. Com- mun. 7, 12902 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Hellmann, S. et al. Time-domain classification of charge- density-wave insulators. Nat. Commun. 3, 1069 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    & Meng, S

    Lian, C., Zhang, S.-J., Hu, S.-Q., Guan, M.-X. & Meng, S. Ultrafast charge ordering by self-amplified exciton– phonon dynamics in TiSe2. Nat. Commun. 11, 43 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Duan, S. et al. Optical manipulation of electronic dimen- sionality in a quantum material. Nature 595, 239–244 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Cheng, Y. et al. Light-induced dimension crossover dic- tated by excitonic correlations. Nat. Commun. 13, 963 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Huber, T. et al. Coherent structural dynamics of a pro- totypical charge-density-wave-to-metal transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 026401 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Ultrafast formation of a charge density wave state in 1T-TaS2: Observation at nanometer scales using time-resolved x-ray diffraction

    Laulh´ e, C.et al. Ultrafast formation of a charge density wave state in 1T-TaS2: Observation at nanometer scales using time-resolved x-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 247401 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    X-ray study of femtosecond structural dynamics in the 2d charge density wave compound 1T- TaS2

    Laulh´ e, C.et al. X-ray study of femtosecond structural dynamics in the 2d charge density wave compound 1T- TaS2. Physica B 460, 100–104 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    & Meng, S

    Nie, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, D. & Meng, S. Unraveling hidden charge density wave phases in 1T-TiSe 2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 196401 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    & Cohen, A

    Tang, Y. & Cohen, A. E. Optical chirality and its inter- action with matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 163901 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    J., Moncton, D

    Di Salvo, F. J., Moncton, D. & Waszczak, J. Electronic properties and superlattice formation in the semimetal TiSe2. Phys. Rev. B 14, 4321 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    Emission of electrons from the surface of metals induced by ultrashort laser pulses

    Anisimov, S. Emission of electrons from the surface of metals induced by ultrashort laser pulses. Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 375 (1974)

    1974

  26. [34]

    Vogelgesang, S. et al. Phase ordering of charge density waves traced by ultrafast low-energy electron diffraction. Nat. Phys. 14, 184–190 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Zong, A. et al. Evidence for topological defects in a pho- toinduced phase transition. Nat. Phys 15, 27–31 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    H., Kara- petrov, G

    Wickramaratne, D., Subedi, S., Torchinsky, D. H., Kara- petrov, G. & Mazin, I. Photoinduced chiral charge den- sity wave in TiSe2. Phys. Rev. B 105, 054102 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    & Dietzek, B

    Meyer-Ilse, J., Akimov, D. & Dietzek, B. Recent ad- vances in ultrafast time-resolved chirality measurements: perspective and outlook. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 495– 505 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.