REVIEW 1 cited by
Ultra-high Energy Gamma-rays from Past Explosions in our Galaxy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The discovery of the sources of ultra-high energy photons by High-Altitude Water Cerenkov Gamma ray Observatory and Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory in our Galaxy has revolutionised the field of gamma ray astronomy in the last few years. These emissions are sometimes found in the vicinity of powerful pulsars or supernova remnants associated with giant molecular clouds. Inverse Compton emission by shock accelerated electrons emitted by pulsars and proton-proton interactions of shock accelerated protons emitted by supernova remnants with cold protons in molecular clouds are often identified as the causes of these emissions. In this paper we have selected two ultra-high energy photon sources LHAASO J2108+5157 and LHAASO J0341+5258 which are associated with giant molecular clouds, but no powerful pulsar or supernova remnant has been detected in their vicinity.We have proposed a scenario where shock accelerated electrons and protons are injected in the local environment of these sources from past explosions, which happened thousands of years ago. We show that the observed ultra-high energy photon flux can be explained with the secondary gamma rays produced by the time evolved relativistic electron and proton spectra.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Gamma-ray emission from particle illumination and shock-cloud interaction in the W51 Complex
A model in which particles were injected into the W51B molecular cloud for 420 years about 18,000 years ago and stayed confined reproduces LHAASO's ultra-high-energy gamma-ray spectrum of W51, whereas direct SNR-cloud...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.