Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 66 references

Multiple sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions for a Gross-Pitaevskii type system on bounded domains: the $L^2$-supercritical case

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For small prescribed masses, the m-coupled Gross-Pitaevskii system on a bounded domain admits j sign-changing and j semi-nodal normalized solutions for every positive integer j, with no sign restriction on the coupling coefficients.

desk verdict The vector linking method is a genuine innovation and the main existence results are likely correct, but the simultaneous choice of the radius ρ is under-justified and must be fixed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22152 v2 pith:QD57MUA5 submitted 2025-06-27 math.AP

Tianhao Liu , Linjie Song , Qiaoran Wu , Wenming Zou This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J5035J1535J60
keywords normalizedsolutionssign-changingsemi-nodalGross-PitaevskiisystemvectorlinkboundeddomainsL2-supercriticalbifurcation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to prove that a system of m coupled Gross-Pitaevskii equations on a bounded domain in $R^{3}$ or $R^{4}$, with prescribed L2 masses and no sign restrictions on the interaction coefficients, has as many sign-changing or mixed-sign normalized solutions as one wants, provided the masses satisfy a smallness condition stated as max_i $c_i^{2}$ / min_i c_i below an explicit threshold. If true, this would be the first multiplicity result for sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions of such a coupled system on bounded domains, in all regimes of the coefficients, including the Sobolev-critical dimension N=4. The paper also claims that the sets of nontrivial and semi-trivial bifurcation points from zero are exactly the tuples of Dirichlet eigenvalues, obtained by analyzing the limit of these solutions as all masses tend to zero. The mechanism is a new vector-linking minimax construction on the product of mass spheres, together with an invariant-flow framework that keeps Palais-Smale sequences out of the positive and negative cones and therefore controls the sign of each component.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the vector link (Definition 2.4): a compact set A in the product mass sphere S_vec_c, with a distinguished boundary partial M_{k+1}, is linked to the sign-changing sphere S_perp_k, meaning every continuous deformation of A that fixes the boundary must touch S_perp_k. The partial vector link (Definition 2.11) projects the flow onto the first d coordinates, forcing d components to change sign while the remaining m-d components are kept positive by invariant cone neighborhoods. Around this sit two supporting mechanisms: a product-manifold version of the classical flow-invariance criterion (Proposition 3.2) that keeps deformations inside the mass sphere, and a pseudo-gradient field of the form Id - G built from auxiliary linear equations (4.1)-(4.2), whose zero set is exactly the set of solutions.

What would settle it

Check the step in the proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 where the chosen radius rho is asserted also to satisfy 2 rho < (beta_max^+)^{-1} $C_N^{2}$ when N=4 and (mu_i^+ + beta_max^+) 2 $rho^{3}$ <= Lambda_1 $C_N^{8}$ c_i for every i. A concrete test is to fix two masses satisfying the ratio condition and solve these inequalities together with (2.15); if some admissible mass pair admits no rho, the invariant-cone and Palais-Smale arguments in Sections 4-6 do not cover that pair.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is Theorems 1.1 and 1.2: for any fixed integer j and any d with 1 <= d <= m-1, there are constants c_tilde_j and c_tilde_{j,d} such that whenever max_i $c_i^{2}$ / min_i c_i is below the relevant constant, the system (1.2)-(1.3) has at least j sign-changing normalized solutions and at least j (d,m-d)-semi-nodal normalized solutions (first d components sign-changing, remaining components positive). This holds for every choice of nonzero signs of the self-coupling mu_i and cross-coupling beta_ij on any bounded regular domain in N=3,4; N=4 is the Sobolev-critical case where energy compactness is delicate. The bifurcation theorems 1.5 and 1.6 state that, as the mass vector tends to zero, nontrivial solutions emerge exactly from every tuple (lambda_1,...,lambda_m) in which each lambda_i is a Dirichlet eigenvalue of -$\Delta$, and semi-trivial solutions emerge exactly from tuples containing at least one Dirichlet eigenvalue. The authors present this as the first use of a linking-type method for coupled normalized systems and the first description of the full bifurcation set from zero with the vector $\lambda$ as parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 assume one can choose a single radius rho that satisfies all the energy and cone inequalities, including two extra bounds that are only asserted by analogy with Remark 2.8 and not checked in detail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any chosen j, the system has at least j distinct sign-changing normalized solutions at small prescribed masses, with distinct energy levels ordered along the Dirichlet eigenvalue sequence.
  • For every split d, at least j solutions have exactly their first d components sign-changing and the rest positive, giving mixed-sign profiles not previously available.
  • The existence holds with all signs of mu_i and beta_ij allowed, so attractive, repulsive, and mixed couplings are treated uniformly.
  • As masses tend to zero, every tuple of Dirichlet eigenvalues is a bifurcation point from zero for nontrivial branches, and every tuple with at least one eigenvalue coordinate is a semi-trivial bifurcation point.
  • The same construction, by Remark 1.8, extends to more general nonlinearities with one sign-preserving and one sign-changing growth, including non-even nonlinearities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is whether the ratio condition can be replaced by a plain upper bound on all masses; the minimax levels depend on the masses only through quantities like Lambda_{k+1} sum_i c_i, so a uniform smallness bound may suffice, but the paper does not claim this.
  • The bifurcation picture suggests the j branches found at small masses belong to m-dimensional continua emanating from the eigenvalue tuples; tracking these continua numerically on a disk or cube would give a concrete check of the predicted branch count.
  • In the critical dimension N=4, the solutions are produced below an explicit energy level tied to the Sobolev constant, which suggests their vanishing limit may carry a rescaled concentration profile, a property the paper does not analyze.
  • The semi-nodal solutions with some positive components may persist if the prescribed masses of the positive components are kept bounded away from zero while only the sign-changing masses shrink, since the partial-link estimates only need the ratio involving min over the first d components.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies the m-coupled Gross-Pitaevskii system on bounded regular domains in dimensions N=3,4, with prescribed L^2 masses c_j and unknown Lagrange multipliers. The authors introduce a vector-link construction and a partial vector-link construction on the product of mass spheres, develop a flow-invariance framework on product manifolds that extends the Brézis-Martin result, prove a Palais-Smale condition below a critical threshold, and use these to establish Theorems 1.1 and 1.2: for any prescribed number j, all sufficiently small mass ratios admit at least j sign-changing, respectively (d,m-d)-semi-nodal, normalized solutions. The paper also analyzes the limit c -> 0 and derives Theorems 1.5 and 1.6, asserting that the sets of nontrivial and semi-trivial bifurcation points from zero are exactly the tuples of Dirichlet eigenvalues.

Significance. If the main results are correct, they are substantial: they provide the first multiplicity results for sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions of the m-coupled Gross-Pitaevskii system on bounded domains in the L^2-supercritical and Sobolev-critical regime, with no sign restriction on the coupling constants. The proposed partial vector linking is a new tool, the thresholds c~_j and c~_{j,d} are stated to be explicit, and the product-manifold generalization of the Brézis-Martin theorem is of independent interest. The proof architecture is coherent and largely self-contained, and the paper gives credit to the underlying techniques in [35] and [59]. However, a quantitative error in the main flow-invariance lemma and an unverified simultaneous choice of the radius rho currently leave load-bearing steps incomplete, so the results cannot be accepted as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Lemma 4.5] The stated small-mass condition is insufficient for the estimate it supports. The proof derives λ_i c_i ≤ [(μ_i + β_max^+) C_N^{-4} ρ^{3/2} − (Λ_1 c_i)^{1/2}] (∫|∇w_i|^2 dx)^{1/2}, so λ_i ≤ 0 requires (μ_i + β_max^+)^2 ρ^3 ≤ Λ_1 C_N^8 c_i. The assumption printed in Lemma 4.5, however, is (μ_i^+ + β_max^+) 2ρ^3 ≤ Λ_1 C_N^8 c_i, which lacks the square and contains an extra factor 2. For example, if μ_i + β_max^+ is larger than 2, the printed inequality can hold while the squared inequality fails. Since Lemma 4.5 is precisely the step that forces G(⃗u) to remain in (±P_i)_{δ/2} and is used in Theorem 5.1, Theorem 6.1, and the proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, this must be corrected.
  2. [§5 and §6, proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2] The simultaneous admissibility of a single radius ρ is asserted rather than verified. After Remark 2.8 establishes (2.5), (2.9), and (2.10), the proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 pass to the additional bounds 2ρ < (β_max^+)^{-1} C_N^2 when N=4 and (μ_i^+ + β_max^+) 2ρ^3 ≤ Λ_1 C_N^8 c_i with the phrase “Reasoning as Remark 2.8, we can further assume”. With the corrected squared bound, the additional constraint scales as ρ^3 ≤ O(c_i), while the earlier constraints force ρ ≈ Λ_{k+1} Σ c_i, so for arbitrarily small masses the inequalities are compatible by taking c~_j small. But this compatibility is not demonstrated in the manuscript, and the invariant cone sets and the Palais-Smale argument depend on it. A concrete verification, or a modified choice of ρ, is needed before Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 are established.
  3. [§7, proofs of Theorems 1.5 and 1.6] The “only if” directions of the bifurcation characterizations are not proved. In the proof of Theorem 1.5 the statement “it is relatively standard to show that any nontrivial bifurcation point of system (1.2) is in B” appears without argument or reference, and the analogous sentence appears in the proof of Theorem 1.6 for d-semi-trivial bifurcation points. Since the theorems assert exact equalities of bifurcation-point sets, the reverse inclusions are part of the central claims. The paper should either give the compactness/scaling argument or provide a precise reference for this standard step.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§6, proof of Theorem 1.2] The proof invokes “(2.5), (2.9) and (2.10)” after citing Remark 2.15, but for the semi-nodal minimax the relevant conditions are (2.18) and (2.19), not (2.9) and (2.10). The same mismatch appears inside the proof of Lemma 2.13, where the text refers to (2.9) instead of (2.18).
  2. [§4, Lemma 4.5 and Proposition 4.8] The condition “2ρ < (β_max^+)^{-1} C_N^2 if N=4” is undefined when β_max^+ = 0. The condition should be stated only when β_max^+ > 0, with the understanding that no such restriction is needed in the purely defocusing or non-positive coupling case.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be fixed: “simlilar” in Lemma 2.7, “Sobolve” in Lemma 4.6, “complements” in Definition 1.4 where “components” is meant, and “nontrivial bifurcation point” in Proposition 7.1 where the plural is sometimes intended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the minimax construction is independent of the solutions it seeks, and the cited prior work is used only as a template with full proofs supplied.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The minimax levels m^δ_{⃗c,ρ,k} and m^δ_{⃗c,ρ,k,d} are defined from spectral data (the eigenfunctions φ_k and eigenvalues Λ_k), the fixed mass sphere S_⃗c, and the energy E; they are not defined in terms of the sought sign-changing or semi-nodal solutions. Critical points are obtained by producing Palais–Smale sequences in the invariant cone neighborhoods via the descending-flow framework of Section 4, with the flow invariance verified in Lemma 4.5 and Proposition 4.8, rather than assumed. The self-citations [35] and [59] involve overlapping authors, but they are not load-bearing: Proposition 3.2, Corollary 3.3, and Lemma 3.4 are proved in the paper, and the bifurcation argument of Section 7 provides its own asymptotic analysis of the normalized solutions. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the cited papers. The phrase 'Reasoning as Remark 2.8, we can further assume' asserts a simultaneous admissibility condition on ρ; whether that assertion is fully justified is a correctness question, not a circularity, because it does not presuppose the existence of the target solutions. In particular, no displayed equation equates a fitted parameter with a predicted quantity, and no theorem reduces to its own statement by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spectral and Sobolev tools plus a set of smallness inequalities for the auxiliary parameters rho and delta. No physical or empirical constants are fitted; the coupling constants µ_i, β_ij and masses c_i are inputs of the problem.

free parameters (3)
  • rho (energy radius) = chosen small, dependent on c
    Defines the bounded set B_rho and the minimax levels; must satisfy (2.5), (2.9), (2.10) and extra bounds in Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6.
  • delta (cone-neighborhood width) = 0 < delta < min{delta_0, delta_hat}
    Used to separate sign-changing solutions from cones; existence via Lemmas 2.5 and 4.5.
  • c_tilde_j, c_tilde_j,d (mass thresholds) = exist but not explicit
    Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 claim the existence of thresholds; Remark 1.3 says they can be explicitly estimated, but no formula is given.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Sobolev embedding H^1_0(Omega) into L^4(Omega) and L^6(Omega) with best constants C_N
    Used in estimates (2.7), (2.8), Lemma 2.6, Lemma 4.5.
  • domain assumption Spectral theory of Dirichlet Laplacian: discrete eigenvalues 0<Lambda_1<Lambda_2<=... with eigenfunctions phi_k and infinitely many simple eigenvalues
    Eigenfunction decomposition and selection of k with Lambda_k<Lambda_{k+1}; invoked in Section 2 and Proof of Theorem 1.1.
  • standard math Flow-invariance theorem of Brezis-Martin type (Proposition 3.1)
    Quoted from Deimling/Brezis/Martin to prove flow invariance on product manifolds.
  • standard math Strong maximum principle and Lagrange multiplier principle
    Used to deduce positivity of the last m-d components and the Lagrange structure of solutions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiple sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions for a Gross-Pitaevskii type system on bounded domains: the $L^2$-supercritical case." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QD57MUA5

@misc{pith2026250622152,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiple sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions for a Gross-Pitaevskii type system on bounded domains: the $L^2$-supercritical case},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QD57MUA5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22152}
}
abstract

In this paper we investigate the existence of multiple sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions for an $m$-coupled elliptic system of the Gross-Pitaevskii type: \begin{equation} \left\{ \begin{aligned} &-\Delta u_j + \lambda_j u_j = \sum_{k=1 }^m\beta_{kj} u_k^2 u_j, \quad u_j \in H_0^1(\Omega), &\int_\Omega u_j^2dx = c_j, \quad j = 1,2,\cdots,m. \end{aligned} \right. \end{equation} Here, $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^N$ ($N = 3,4$) is a bounded domain. The constants $\beta_{kj} \neq 0$ and $c_j > 0$ are prescribed constants, while $\lambda_1, \cdots, \lambda_m$ are unknown and appear as Lagrange multipliers. This is the first result in the literature on the existence and multiplicity of sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions of couple Schr\"odinger system in all regimes of $\beta_{kj}$. The main tool which we use is a new skill of vector linking and this article attempts for the first time to use linking method to search for solutions of a coupled system. Particularly, to obtain semi-nodal normalized solutions, we introduce partial vector linking which is new up to our knowledge. Moreover, by investigating the limit process as $\vec{c}=(c_1,\ldots,c_m) \to \vec{0}$ we obtain some bifurcation results. Note that when $N=4$, the system is of Sobolev critical.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Jeanjean, L.J

    L. Jeanjean, L.J. Song, Sign-changing prescribed mass solutions for L2-supercritical NLS on compact metric graphs, arXiv:2501.14642

    arXiv

  2. [59]

    Song, W.M

    L.J. Song, W.M. Zou, On Multiple Sign-changing Normalized Solutions to the Br´ezis-Nirenberg Prob- lem, Math. Z. 309 (2025), no. 4, Paper No. 61

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    Akhmediev, A

    N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, Partially coherent solitons on a finite background, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82 (1999) 2661-2664

    work page 1999

  4. [2]

    Anderson, J.R

    M.H. Anderson, J.R. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, C.E. Wieman, E.A. Cornell, Observation of Bose- Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor, Science 269 (1995) 198-198

    work page 1995

  5. [3]

    Bartsch, Bifurcation in a multicomponent system of nonlinear Schr¨odinger equations, J

    T. Bartsch, Bifurcation in a multicomponent system of nonlinear Schr¨odinger equations, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 13 (2013) 37-50

    work page 2013

  6. [4]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Clapp, Bifurcation Theory for Symmetric Potential Operators and the Equivariant Cup- length, Math. Z. 204 (1990) 341-356. 42

    work page 1990

  7. [5]

    Bartsch, E.N

    T. Bartsch, E.N. Dancer, Z.-Q. Wang, A Liouville theorem, a priori bounds, and bifurcating branches of positive solutions for a nonlinear elliptic system, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 37 (2010) 345-361

    work page 2010

  8. [6]

    Bartsch, L

    T. Bartsch, L. Jeanjean, Normalized solutions for nonlinear Schr ¨odinger systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 148 (2018) 225-242

    work page 2018

Show all 66 references
  1. [7]

    Bartsch, L

    T. Bartsch, L. Jeanjean, N. Soave, Normalized solutions for a system of coupled cubic Schr ¨odinger equations on R3, J. Math. Pures Appl. 106 (2016) 583-614

    2016

  2. [8]

    Bartsch, Z.L

    T. Bartsch, Z.L. Liu, T. Weth, Sign-changing solutions to superlinear Schr ¨odinger equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 29 (2004) 25-42

    2004

  3. [9]

    Bartsch, H.W

    T. Bartsch, H.W. Li, W.M. Zou, Existence and asymptotic behavior of normalized ground states for Sobolev critical Schr¨odinger systems, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 62 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 9, 34 pp

    2023

  4. [10]

    Bartsch, R

    T. Bartsch, R. Molle, M. Rizzi, G. Verzini, Normalized solutions of mass supercritical Schr ¨odinger equations with potential, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 46 (9) (2021) 1729–1756

    2021

  5. [11]

    Bartsch, S.J

    T. Bartsch, S.J. Qi, W.Zou, Normalized solutions to Schr ¨odinger equations with potential and inho- mogeneous nonlinearities on large smooth domains, Math. Ann. 390 (2024) 4813–4859

    2024

  6. [12]

    Bartsch, N

    T. Bartsch, N. Soave, A natural constraint approach to normalized solutions of nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equations and systems, J. Funct. Anal. 272 (2017) 4998-5037

    2017

  7. [13]

    A natural constraint approach to normalized solutions of nonlin- ear Schr¨odinger equations and systems

    T. Bartsch, N. Soave, Correction to: “A natural constraint approach to normalized solutions of nonlin- ear Schr¨odinger equations and systems” [J. Funct. Anal. 272 (12) (2017) 4998-5037], J. Funct. Anal. 275 (2018) 516-521

    2017

  8. [14]

    Bartsch, N

    T. Bartsch, N. Soave, Multiple normalized solutions for a competing system of Schr¨odinger equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), no. 1, Paper No. 22, 24 pp

    2019

  9. [15]

    Bartsch, R.S

    T. Bartsch, R.S. Tian, Z.-Q. Wang, Bifurcations for a coupled Schr¨odinger system with multiple com- ponents, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 66 (5) (2015) 2109-2123

    2015

  10. [16]

    Bartsch, X.X

    T. Bartsch, X.X. Zhong, W.M. Zou, Normalized solutions for a coupled Schr ¨odinger system, Math. Ann. 380 (2021) 1713-1740

    2021

  11. [17]

    Borthwick, X.J

    J. Borthwick, X.J. Chang, L. Jeanjean, N. Soave, Bounded Palais-Smale sequences with Morse type information for some constrained functionals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 377 (2024) 4481–4517

    2024

  12. [18]

    Brezis, On a characterization of flow invariant sets, Comm

    H. Brezis, On a characterization of flow invariant sets, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 23 (1970) 261-263

    1970

  13. [19]

    Br ´ezis, E.H

    H. Br ´ezis, E.H. Lieb, A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and convergence of functionals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (3) (1983) 486-490

    1983

  14. [20]

    Cantrell, C

    R.S. Cantrell, C. Cosner, Spatial Ecology via Reaction-Diffusion Equations, Wiley Series in Mathe- matical and Computational Biology, Wiley, Chichester (2003)

    2003

  15. [21]

    Cerami, D

    G. Cerami, D. Fortunato, M. Struwe, Bifurcation and multiplicity results for nonlinear elliptic prob- lems involving critical Sobolev exponents, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar ´e Anal. Non Lin ´eaire 1 (1984) 341- 350

    1984

  16. [22]

    Chen, W.M

    Z.J. Chen, W.M. Zou, An optimal constant for the existence of least energy solutions of a coupled Schr¨odinger system, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 48 (2013) 695-711. 43

    2013

  17. [23]

    Chen, W.M

    Z.J. Chen, W.M. Zou, Positive least energy solutions and phase separation for coupled Schr ¨odinger equations with critical exponent: higher dimensional case, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 52 (2015) 423-467

    2015

  18. [24]

    Conti, S

    M. Conti, S. Terracini, G. Verzini, Nehari’s problem and competing species systems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´e Anal. Non Lin´eaire 19 (2002) 871-888

    2002

  19. [25]

    Conti, S

    M. Conti, S. Terracini, G. Verzini, An optimal partition problem related to nonlinear eigenvalues, J. Funct. Anal. 198 (2003) 160-196

    2003

  20. [26]

    Crandall, P.H

    M.G. Crandall, P.H. Rabinowitz, Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues, J. Funct. Anal. 8 (1971) 321- 340

    1971

  21. [27]

    Crandall, P.H

    M.G. Crandall, P.H. Rabinowitz, Bifurcation, perturbation of simple eigenvalues and linearized sta- bility, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 52 (1973) 161-180

    1973

  22. [28]

    Deimling, Ordinary Differential Equations in Banach Spaces, Lecture Notes in Math., V ol

    K. Deimling, Ordinary Differential Equations in Banach Spaces, Lecture Notes in Math., V ol. 596, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977

    1977

  23. [29]

    B. Esry, C. Greene, J. Burke, J. Bohn, Hartree–Fock theory for double condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3594-3597

    1997

  24. [30]

    Fadell, P.H

    E. Fadell, P.H. Rabinowitz, Bifurcation for odd potential operators and an alternative topological in- dex, J. Funct. Anal. 26 (1977) 48-67

    1977

  25. [31]

    Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems, Nuovo Cimento 20 (1961) 454-477

    E.P. Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems, Nuovo Cimento 20 (1961) 454-477

    1961

  26. [32]

    Hioe, Solitary waves for N coupled nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equations, Phys

    F.T. Hioe, Solitary waves for N coupled nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1152-1155

    1999

  27. [33]

    Jeanjean, Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal

    L. Jeanjean, Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal. 28 (10) (1997) 1633-1659

    1997

  28. [34]

    Jeanjean, S.S

    L. Jeanjean, S.S. Lu, On global minimizers for a mass constrained problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differ- ential Equations 61 (2022), no. 6, Paper No. 214, 18 pp

    2022

  29. [36]

    Jeanjean, L.J

    L. Jeanjean, L.J. Song, W.M. Zou, Exact number of positive solutions and existence of sign-changing solutions with prescribed mass for NLS on bounded domains, in preparation

  30. [37]

    Jeanjean, Thanh Trung Le, Multiple normalized solutions for a Sobolev critical Schr ¨odinger equa- tion, Math

    L. Jeanjean, Thanh Trung Le, Multiple normalized solutions for a Sobolev critical Schr ¨odinger equa- tion, Math. Ann. 384 (2022) 101–134

    2022

  31. [38]

    Jeanjean, J.J

    L. Jeanjean, J.J. Zhang, X.X. Zhong, A global branch approach to normalized solutions for the Schr¨odinger equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 183 (2024) 44–75

    2024

  32. [39]

    Kielh ¨ofer, A bifurcation theorem for potential operators, J

    H. Kielh ¨ofer, A bifurcation theorem for potential operators, J. Funct. Anal. 77 (1988) 1-8

    1988

  33. [40]

    H.W. Li, W.M. Zou, Normalized ground states for semilinear elliptic systems with critical and sub- critical nonlinearities, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 23 (2021), no. 3, Paper No. 43, 30 pp

    2021

  34. [41]

    H.W. Li, T.H. Liu, W.M. Zou, Normalized solutions for a class of Sobolev critical Schr ¨odinger sys- tems, arXiv:2410.15750. 44

    arXiv

  35. [42]

    Liu, L.J

    T.H. Liu, L.J. Song, Q.R. Wu, W.M. Zou, Infinitely many sign-changing and semi-nodal normalized solutions for a Gross-Pitaevskii type system on bounded domain: at almost L2-critical case, to appear

  36. [43]

    Martin, Differential equations on closed subsets of a Banach space, Trans

    R.H. Martin, Differential equations on closed subsets of a Banach space, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 179 (1973) 399-414

    1973

  37. [44]

    Martin, Nonlinear Operators and Differential Equations in Banach Spaces, John Wiley & Sons, 1976

    R.H. Martin, Nonlinear Operators and Differential Equations in Banach Spaces, John Wiley & Sons, 1976

    1976

  38. [45]

    Mitchell, Z.G

    M. Mitchell, Z.G. Chen, M.F. Shih, M. Segev, Self-trapping of partially spatially incoherent light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 490-493

    1996

  39. [46]

    Myatt, E.A

    C.J. Myatt, E.A. Burt, R.W. Ghrits, E.A. Cornell, C.E. Wieman, Production of two overlapping Bose- Einstein condensates by sympathetic cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 586-589

    1997

  40. [47]

    Noris, H

    B. Noris, H. Tavares, G. Verzini, Normalized solutions for nonlinear Schr¨odinger systems on bounded domains, Nonlinearity 32 (2019) 1044-1072

    2019

  41. [48]

    Noris, H

    B. Noris, H. Tavares,G. Verzini, Existence and orbital stability of the ground states with prescribed mass for the L2-critical and supercritical NLS on bounded domains, Anal. PDE 7 (2014) 1807–1838

    2014

  42. [49]

    Parkins, D.F

    A.S. Parkins, D.F. Walls, The physics of trapped dilute-gas Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rep. 303 (1998) 1-80

    1998

  43. [50]

    Vaira, G

    B.Pellacci, A.Pistoia, G. Vaira, G. Verzini, Normalized concentrating solutions to nonlinear elliptic problems, J. Differential Equations 275 (2021) 882–919

    2021

  44. [51]

    Pierotti, G

    D. Pierotti, G. Verzini, Normalized bound states for the nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation in bounded domains, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), no. 5, Paper No. 133, 27 pp

    2017

  45. [52]

    Pierotti, G

    D. Pierotti, G. Verzini, J. Yu, Normalized solutions for Sobolev critical Schr ¨odinger equations on bounded domains, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 57 (2025) 262–285

    2025

  46. [53]

    Pitaevskii, S

    L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation, Oxford (2003)

    2003

  47. [54]

    Rabinowitz, Some global results for nonlinear eigenvalue problems, J

    P.H. Rabinowitz, Some global results for nonlinear eigenvalue problems, J. Func. Anal. 7 (1971) 487- 513

    1971

  48. [55]

    Rabinowitz, A bifurcation theorem for potential operators, J

    P.H. Rabinowitz, A bifurcation theorem for potential operators, J. Funct. Anal. 25 (1977) 412-424

    1977

  49. [56]

    Song, Existence and orbital stability/instability of standing waves with prescribed mass for theL2- supercritical NLS in bounded domains and exterior domains, Calc

    L.J. Song, Existence and orbital stability/instability of standing waves with prescribed mass for theL2- supercritical NLS in bounded domains and exterior domains, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 62 (6) (2023), Paper No. 176

    2023

  50. [57]

    Song, W.M

    L.J. Song, W.M. Zou, Two Positive Normalized Solutions and Phase Separation for Coupled Schr¨odinger Equations on Bounded Domain with L2-Supercritical and Sobolev Critical or Subcrit- ical Exponent, arXiv:2311.16861

    arXiv

  51. [58]

    Song, W.M

    L.J. Song, W.M. Zou, Two Positive Normalized Solutions on Star-shaped Bounded Domains to the Br´ezis-Nirenberg Problem, I: Existence, arXiv:2404.11204

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Stuart, Bifurcation for variational problems when the linearisation has no eigenvalues, J

    C.A. Stuart, Bifurcation for variational problems when the linearisation has no eigenvalues, J. Funct. Anal. 38 (2) (1980) 169-187. 45

    1980

  53. [61]

    Stuart, Bifurcation for Dirichlet problems without eigenvalues, Proc

    C.A. Stuart, Bifurcation for Dirichlet problems without eigenvalues, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 45 (3) (1982) 169-192

    1982

  54. [62]

    Stuart, Bifurcation from the essential spectrum for some noncompact nonlinearities, Math

    C.A. Stuart, Bifurcation from the essential spectrum for some noncompact nonlinearities, Math. Meth- ods Appl. Sci. 11 (4) (1989) 525-542

    1989

  55. [63]

    Tavares, S

    H. Tavares, S. Terracini, Sign-changing solutions of competition-diffusion elliptic systems and optimal partition problems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´e Anal. Non Lin´eaire 29 (2012) 279-300

    2012

  56. [64]

    Timmermans, Phase separation of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys

    E. Timmermans, Phase separation of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 5718- 5721

    1998

  57. [65]

    Wei, X.X

    J.C. Wei, X.X. Zhong, W.M. Zou, On Sirakov’s open problem and related topics, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 23 (2022) 959-992

    2022

  58. [66]

    Zou, Sign-Changing Critical Points Theory, Springer, New York, 2008

    W.M. Zou, Sign-Changing Critical Points Theory, Springer, New York, 2008. 46

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.