Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The recent history of the X-ray absorber in NGC3516

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0010161 v1 pith:QDAAAM54 submitted 2000-10-09 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords ngc3516absorptionabsorbercoldseenx-rayablatedabsorbing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present two BeppoSAX observations of the bright Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC3516, performed four months apart (late 1996/early 1997). The earlier spectrum is considerably weaker and harder in the whole 0.1-50 keV energy range. In addition, the warm absorber oxygen features, which were already observed with ROSAT (Mathur et al. 1997) and ASCA (Kriss et al. 1996), are much less pronounced. The most straightforward explanation is that in 1996 November NGC3516 was being seen through a substantial (N_H ~ 10^22 atoms/cm/cm) column of cold material. This is the first confirmation with modern instrumentation that NGC3516 indeed undergoes phases of strong cold X-ray absorption. We speculate that these intervals may be connected to the onset of the remarkably variable UV absorption system, making NGC3516 the best known example of low-luminosity Broad Absorption Line (BAL) quasar. The absorbing matter could be provided by clouds ablated from the rim of the circumnuclear molecular torus, seen at a rather high inclination angle.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools