Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

The Stripped-Star Ultraviolet Magellanic Cloud Survey (SUMS): The UV Photometric Catalog and Stripped Star Candidate Selection

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read From 2,420 archival Swift UV images, this paper builds a 734,869-source catalog and identifies 820 candidate stripped-star systems by their ultraviolet excess blueward of the theoretical main sequence.

desk verdict A genuinely useful UV catalog and a plausible candidate list, but the 820 count is anchored by a single extinction choice the paper itself shows is fragile. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.18632 v2 pith:QDPFOC7L submitted 2025-05-24 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Bethany Ludwig , Maria R. Drout , Ylva Gotberg , Dustin Lang , Alexander Laroche This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords CompactbinarystarsInteractingCommonenvelopeGravitationalwavesourcesUltravioletphotometryMassiveStrippedMagellanicClouds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Most massive stars are predicted to interact with a binary companion, and roughly 30% are expected to lose their hydrogen envelopes, leaving hot, helium-rich 'stripped stars' of about 1–8 $M_\odot$ that radiate mostly in the ultraviolet. This paper tries to establish that these stars can be found at scale in archival Swift satellite images of the Magellanic Clouds: it builds a 734,869-source ultraviolet photometric catalog and selects 820 systems — 522 in the Large Magellanic Cloud and 298 in the Small Magellanic Cloud — whose ultraviolet light is bluer than that of any ordinary main-sequence star, the signature predicted for a stripped star with a companion that does not outshine it. If the selection is correct, this is the groundwork for the first systematic census of a population tied to stripped-envelope supernovae, compact-object mergers, and cosmic reionization, and it explains why the objects were missed for decades: over 70% of the candidates are fainter than 19th magnitude in V-band light. The authors identify dust as the dominant uncertainty — a single extinction correction per galaxy is assumed, and early main-sequence stars can mimic stripped-star colors when extinction is overcorrected — so the 820 names are a candidate list built for spectroscopic follow-up rather than a finished census.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the UV-excess selection itself: each source's extinction-corrected magnitudes are compared, in nine UV-optical color-magnitude diagrams, against a theoretical zero-age main sequence — the locus where stars begin core hydrogen burning — built from MESA evolutionary models and Kurucz ATLAS model atmospheres, and a source must lie blueward of that line by more than its photometric error in at least four of the nine diagrams. That comparison is possible only because the photometry is carried out with The Tractor forward-modeling code, which fits a radially symmetric point-spread function — reconstructed from Swift's calibration curves of growth — at positions inherited from the MCPS optical survey, deblending the crowded, roughly 2.5-arcsecond-resolution UVOT images; this is the first application of The Tractor to Swift-UVOT data, and the paper validates it with residual tests, aperture-photometry comparisons, and injected-star crowding simulations. The selection also rests on a single adopted extinction value per galaxy — $A_V = 0.38$ mag for the LMC and $0.22$ mag for the SMC, chosen so the theoretical main sequence aligns with the blue edge of the observed main-sequence overdensity — combined with the Gordon et al. (2003) extinction curves.

What would settle it

Take the 105 candidates that remain even at zero assumed extinction — the systems most robust to the dust assumption — and obtain their spectra: if they show ordinary hydrogen-rich B-type main-sequence spectra with no He II absorption and no radial-velocity variation, the UV-excess method is being driven by something other than stripped stars, while hydrogen depletion, high temperature, and binary motion would confirm the method at scale. A purely photometric check is also available in the paper's own Table 4: measuring individual line-of-sight extinctions toward the candidates and recomputing the selection with star-by-star $A_V$ would show whether the 522/298 counts survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that intermediate-mass stripped-star binaries are identifiable by an ultraviolet excess: when a hot stripped star is paired with a main-sequence companion of $\lesssim 8\,M_\odot$ (or a compact object), the system lands blueward of the theoretical zero-age main sequence in UV-optical color-magnitude diagrams built from the Swift UVW2, UVM2, and UVW1 bands. The authors realize this claim observationally by performing forced point-spread-function photometry with forward modeling on 2,420 archival Swift-UVOT images, anchoring positions to the ground-based MCPS optical catalog, and validating the result against standard aperture photometry for isolated stars and against injected two-star simulations. After quality cuts on SED shape, crowding, and Gaia membership, the selection yields 522 candidate systems in the LMC and 298 in the SMC; 18 of the 25 stripped-star candidates previously confirmed spectroscopically survive the stricter cuts, including all eight with clear stripped-star spectral features. The paper is explicit that this count is not the census itself: the number varies from 105 to 820 as the adopted line-of-sight extinction varies, and roughly half the candidates lie close enough to the main sequence that low-reddening B-type stars could mimic them.

Load-bearing premise

The candidate list stands on the assumption that one extinction value per galaxy describes the reddening toward every star: if the true extinction varies from star to star, the sample changes, and the paper itself shows the candidate count spanning 105 systems (at zero extinction) to 820 systems (at the adopted $A_V = 0.38$/$0.22$ mag).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the selection is correct, the Magellanic Clouds host several hundred intermediate-mass stripped-star binaries, and a systematic census of these objects becomes possible from archival ultraviolet imaging rather than new observations.
  • The public SUMS catalog — 734,869 sources with UVW2, UVM2, and UVW1 photometry to roughly 20 Vega mag, plus U, B, V, and I photometry from MCPS — becomes a community resource for ultraviolet population studies of the Clouds, where fewer than 5% of sources have prior classifications.
  • The candidate counts sit in the same order of magnitude as binary population synthesis predictions after efficiency corrections (~414 and ~99 observable systems predicted for the LMC and SMC, versus 522 and 298 candidates), giving modelers a new population to reproduce.
  • Because most candidates are optically faint and many sit close to the main sequence, the paper's 'Very Blue-Excellent' subset is the natural first target list for spectroscopy to confirm masses, temperatures, and hydrogen-depleted surfaces.
  • The paper's control-field analysis implies only about one to two foreground or background objects per galaxy should survive all cuts, so contamination from unrelated stars is not the main source of error in the candidate list; dust is.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Under the single-$A_V$ design, the 820 count is best read as a lower bound on the true stripped-star population, since dusty systems in high-extinction regions are missed, while the 'Blue' ranks nearest the main sequence are the most likely to hide low-reddening main-sequence impostors; if so, the spectroscopic confirmation rate should rise with the 'Very Blue' ranking.
  • The V-shaped ultraviolet SED that the paper identifies as the signature of under-corrected LMC extinction suggests a path that needs no new data: refitting every source with star-by-star extinction, using the UVW2–UVM2–UVW1 morphology and the 2175 Å bump, could sharpen the candidate list and produce an extinction map of both Clouds.
  • If the UV-excess method survives spectroscopic scrutiny here, the same forced-photometry pipeline transfers to other Swift-UVOT fields and to upcoming wide-field ultraviolet missions, making it a standard route to finding post-interaction binaries in any nearby galaxy with known distances and low extinction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the SUMS UV photometric catalog of the Magellanic Clouds, constructed by applying the Tractor forward-modeling code to 2,420 archival Swift-UVOT images, with source positions and optical photometry taken from the MCPS catalog. The catalog contains 734,869 sources in three UV filters (UVW2, UVM2, UVW1). The paper validates the photometry against uvotsource and through injection simulations, then selects candidate stripped-star binaries as sources lying blueward of the theoretical ZAMS in multiple UV-optical CMDs after applying a single extinction correction per galaxy (AV=0.38 mag for the LMC, 0.22 mag for the SMC). After quality cuts and Gaia-based foreground rejection, the final sample contains 522 candidates in the LMC and 298 in the SMC, subclassified into 'Very Blue' and 'Blue' categories. The paper discusses contaminants, presents SED-fitting mass estimates, and compares the candidate counts with binary population synthesis predictions.

Significance. If the candidate identification is correct, this is the first systematic, wide-field census of intermediate-mass stripped-star candidates in the Magellanic Clouds, and the public UV photometric catalog is a valuable community resource. The photometric pipeline is validated carefully, and the paper is unusually transparent about the sensitivity of the candidate counts to the extinction assumption. The recovery of 18/25 spectroscopically confirmed DGL+23 systems, including all Class 1 and most Class 2 objects, is a strong endorsement of the selection methodology. However, the headline number of 820 candidates (522 LMC + 298 SMC) is not robust to the adopted extinction: the paper's own Table 4 shows the count varies from roughly 105 to 820 across a plausible range of AV. The 'Very Blue' subset (105 sources) is far more robust and is the part of the sample that should be emphasized in quantitative claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.2, §5.9.1, Table 4] The single adopted reddening values are calibrated on the same data used for candidate selection: AV=0.38 (LMC) and 0.22 (SMC) are chosen specifically to align the theoretical ZAMS with the blue edge of the observed main-sequence overdensity. Table 4 then shows the candidate count changes from 79/26 at AV=0 to 522/298 at the adopted values, an order-of-magnitude sensitivity. The headline numbers in the Abstract and §5.7 are therefore not an independent measurement of the stripped-star population; they are a consequence of the calibration choice. The authors should either (i) anchor AV with an independent calibration, e.g., using the full distribution of star-by-star extinction from Zaritsky et al. maps or a spatially resolved extinction model, or (ii) present candidate counts as a function of AV and make the AV-robust 'Very Blue' subset (105 sources) the primary quantitative claim.
  2. [§6.6, Eq. (1)] The comparison of observed candidate numbers (522/298) with the Hovis-Afflerbach et al. (2024) population synthesis predictions (414/99) is used to claim broad agreement. However, the observed number is the AV-dependent count from Table 4 and can range from ~105 to ~820 depending on the assumed reddening. Without propagating the AV uncertainty into this comparison, the agreement carries no quantitative weight. The authors should either provide a range of predicted observable numbers across the full AV distribution, or explicitly label this as an illustrative, order-of-magnitude exercise with no statistical claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.2] Typo: 'rational' should be 'rationale' in the sentence describing the choice of AV.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The caption lists 'UVM1' as one of the three UVOT filters; the correct filter designation used throughout the paper is 'UVW1'.
  3. [§1] The mass range for intermediate-mass stripped stars is given as '~2-8 M⊙' in the introduction but later extended to 'broadly include binary stripped stars between 1 and 8 M⊙'; please reconcile these definitions explicitly.
  4. [§3.4.3] Minor typo: 'systemic shift' should be 'systematic shift' in the discussion of the comparison with uvotsource.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Candidate selection uses an extinction zero-point fit to the same MS data that defines the UV-excess boundary, and the SED-shape classification is partly guaranteed by the model-grid cuts; the catalog itself retains independent validation.

  1. self definitional [Section 5.2 'Choice of A_V' and Section 5.3 'Initial Assessment of UV Excess']
    "we find that adopting AV=0.38 and 0.22 mag aligns the blue edge of the large overdensity of stars in the UV-optical CMDs with the theoretical ZAMS described in § 5.1.3."

    The extinction value is not independently measured but is chosen so that the theoretical ZAMS coincides with the blue edge of the observed MS overdensity in the same CMDs used for candidate selection. Candidates are then selected as sources lying bluewards of that ZAMS (§5.3). Thus 'UV excess relative to main-sequence stars' is operationally equivalent to 'bluer than the blue edge of the observed MS tail' after the fitted AV is applied. The headline candidate counts (522 LMC, 298 SMC) therefore depend strongly on this data-calibrated boundary; the paper's own Table 4 shows the counts drop to 79/26 at AV=0. This is a transparent calibration rather than a hidden derivation, but the candidate population is partly defined by the data it is supposed to probe.

  2. self definitional [Section 6.3, footnote 24]
    "We note that this is not unexpected, as we use the composite stripped star plus MS model grid from Drout et al. (2023) as a baseline when performing cuts on SED quality in § 5.4."

    The paper presents three observed SED morphologies as evidence that the candidates resemble stripped-star plus MS binaries, but the same composite model grid was used in §5.4 to reject sources whose SEDs fell outside the grid's expected colors. The observed SED shapes are therefore partly guaranteed by the selection cuts rather than being an independent confirmation of the model grid. The footnote explicitly acknowledges this. This does not undermine the photometric catalog, but the 'consistency' of the candidate SEDs with the stripped-star models is, to some degree, a restatement of the input model rather than a new result.

full rationale

The SUMS catalog itself is built from external data (Swift-UVOT images, MCPS optical positions) and validated against standard uvotsource photometry and against the DGL+23 spectroscopic sample, 18 of 25 of which are recovered by the final cuts. Those checks provide independent grounding for the photometry and for the reality of at least a subset of UV-excess sources. The main circularity concerns are in the candidate-selection calibration: AV is fit so that the theoretical ZAMS matches the blue edge of the observed MS, and candidates are then defined as blueward of that ZAMS, making the candidate count sensitive to the fitted parameter. The paper is unusually transparent about this, including the AV-sensitivity table and the footnote admitting that the SED-shape taxonomy is influenced by the same model grid used for quality cuts. These are real, quotable reductions of parts of the derivation to the input data/models, but they are not a complete circularity: the ZAMS shape is an external theoretical model, the spectroscopic follow-up in DGL+23 provides independent confirmation for a subset, and the paper does not claim the candidate count is a parameter-free prediction. Overall, the central catalog claim is sound; the stripped-star candidate count and the SED-morphology interpretation are partially circular, but honestly disclosed. Score 4 rather than higher because the independent spectroscopic anchor and external model content keep the central result from collapsing into the fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim (catalog and 820 candidates) rests on a small number of fitted or hand-chosen parameters, the most load-bearing being the single AV values per galaxy that set the extinction correction and therefore the sample size. The theoretical ZAMS and composite binary grids are external models from prior work, not fitted here. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)
  • AV_LMC = 0.38 mag
    Adopted LMC extinction correction; chosen to align the theoretical ZAMS with the blue edge of the observed main sequence (S5.2). The number of candidates depends strongly on this value (Table 4).
  • AV_SMC = 0.22 mag
    Adopted SMC extinction correction; chosen to align the theoretical ZAMS with the blue edge of the observed main sequence (S5.2). The number of candidates depends strongly on this value (Table 4).
  • Minimum CMDs for UV excess = 4 of 9
    Hand-chosen threshold in S5.5; sources must lie blueward of ZAMS in at least 4 of 9 CMDs. Determines the final sample size.
  • Flux fraction thresholds = >25% (if neighbor <2.5 arcsec), >10% otherwise
    Hand-chosen contamination cuts in S5.5.
  • Photometric significance threshold = 5 sigma (error <0.217 mag)
    Initial cut in S5.3 for inclusion in UV excess assessment.
  • UV magnitude selection range = 14 < m_UV < 19 AB
    Window in S5.3 designed to target 1-7 Msun stripped stars with companions; excludes brighter WR-like and fainter subdwarf-like sources.
  • f_UVexcess values = 0.2 (stellar companions), 1.0 (compact companions)
    Order-of-magnitude assumptions in Eq. 1 (S6.6) based on DGL+23; not fitted but directly set the predicted observable count.
  • f_extinction values = 0.7 (stellar companions), 0.9 (compact companions)
    Assumed fractions of systems lost to extinction in S6.6; based on fraction of 2D map cells with high AV.
  • f_no_crowding and f_coverage = 0.85, 0.40/0.36
    Assumed fractions in Eq. 1; based on MCPS neighbor fractions and star-formation coverage, order-of-magnitude.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Theoretical ZAMS models (Götberg et al. 2018) at Z=0.006/0.002 correctly mark the blue edge of the main sequence in the LMC/SMC.
    Used as the baseline against which UV excess is measured (S5.1.3). If the ZAMS is actually bluer, some candidates would be ordinary MS stars.
  • domain assumption The DGL+23 composite stripped star plus MS binary grids predict the broadband colors of such systems.
    Used to define acceptable SED shapes in S5.4 and to estimate masses in S6.5.
  • domain assumption The Gordon et al. (2003) average LMC and SMC extinction curves apply to the sightlines.
    Used to derive AX/AV corrections in S5.2; the presence of the 2175A bump in the SMC is uncertain (S6.4).
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 parallaxes and proper motions can identify foreground contaminants.
    Used in S5.6 to remove likely foreground stars; 92% of candidates with robust Gaia data are consistent with Cloud membership.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Stripped-Star Ultraviolet Magellanic Cloud Survey (SUMS): The UV Photometric Catalog and Stripped Star Candidate Selection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDPFOC7L

@misc{pith2026250518632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Stripped-Star Ultraviolet Magellanic Cloud Survey (SUMS): The UV Photometric Catalog and Stripped Star Candidate Selection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDPFOC7L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.18632}
}
abstract

Most massive stars will interact with a binary companion during their lifetimes. These interactions can remove the hydrogen-rich envelope, producing intermediate-mass ($\sim$2-8 M$_\odot$) and helium-rich stars. These "stripped stars" are predicted to emit predominantly in the ultraviolet (UV) and can therefore be identified via a UV excess provided they are not outshone by their companion. However, despite their importance to binary evolution, supernovae, and ionizing feedback, few stripped stars have been confirmed. This is likely due to the scarcity of wide-field, high angular resolution, UV surveys of stellar populations with reliable distances and extinction estimates. To address this, we present the Stripped-Star Ultraviolet Magellanic Clouds Survey (SUMS) catalog. We use the Tractor forward modeling software to perform PSF photometry on 2,420 Swift-UVOT images of the LMC and SMC. The resulting public catalog contains 734,869 sources in three UV filters to a depth of $\sim$20 Vega mag. We perform validation tests on the photometry pipeline and highlight the catalog's broad applicability. We then identify sources with excess UV light compared to main-sequence stars and apply a series of quality cuts. From this, we identify 522 candidate stripped stars in the LMC and 298 in the SMC. We assess the potential contamination from other UV excess systems and argue the dominant uncertainty to be dust: early main-sequence stars can mimic the colors of stripped star binaries when extinction is overcorrected. This survey lays the groundwork for the first systematic census of stripped stars and opens new windows into binary evolution and massive star populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.18632 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A summary of the spatial coverage of the SUMaC survey, which provided extensive imaging of the Magellanic Clouds in the ultraviolet using the UVOT instrument on Swift. The green squares indicate the footprints of individual images associated with the survey, which covered 150 fields in the LMC and 50 fields in the SMC. In total, there was an average of 660 and 219 images obtained in each of the three UVOT UV filters… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of the performance of the Tractor forward modeling pipeline described in Section 3 on a Swift-UVOT image from the SMC. The left column shows the background-subtracted UVOT image in units of counts s−1 . The middle column shows the corresponding model image from which UV magnitudes can be measured. The right column shows the difference or residual image (i.e., the image minus the model) which highlights th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left and Center: Plots of the residual fraction (a metric to quantify the residuals between the Tractor model and original image relative to the brightness of a star being measured; defined in Section 3.4.2) for a set of isolated stars in the SUMaC images. Circles repr…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Absolute difference between the Tractor-measured and true (injected) count-rates, weighted by the reported uncertainty, as a function of decreasing separation between two simulated stars. The three panels correspond to different brightness contrasts between the two inj…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: we plot UV magnitude versus magnitude error for the catalog, which spans 20th to 12th Vega magnitudes. We make this full catalog, as well as the pipeline used to measure the UVOT magnitudes with the Tractor, publicly available for the community. Here we describe the co…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: UV-optical CMDs for the full SUMS UV photometric catalog of the LMC (left) and SMC (right). When plotting, we have cross– matched to the SIMBAD database and removed obvious non-members of the Clouds based on a combination of listed object types (from SIMBAD) and parall…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Summary of the shape of various LMC, SMC, and Milky Way extinction curves in the UV (Gordon et al. 2003, 2009, 2024) compared to the wavelength coverage of Swift’s UV filters. Swift-UVOT’s UV filters (black, purple, and orange curves) are thought to be particularly sen…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The distribution of optical V-band magnitudes for our candidate stripped star population. Colors correspond to the rank assigned in §5.7. for both the LMC and SMC is listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The grid of stripped star plus MS star binaries from DGL+23. Points are color coded by the amount of excess extinc￾tion—beyond what we correct for in our analysis—that could be present along the line-of-sight before they would no longer be iden￾tified by our selection…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows that (i) the ‘Very Blue’ category is unlikely to be polluted by MS stars with low extinction, but must in￾stead contain hotter sources and (ii) very few MS stars > 20% through hydrogen burning are likely to enter either sample. 5.9.4. Comparison of Adopted Extin…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The spatial distribution of our final sample stripped star candidates described in § 5.7 (green points) within the Magellanic Clouds. A few specific open clusters are labeled here for reference. The background optical image is the same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Top row: Theoretical CMDs showcasing evolutionary models at the metallicity of the LMC. Stripped star models are seen here as the dark blue dots connected with a vertical line and MS star models are gray lines that are located to the right of the thick beige and gray …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Top Panels: Examples of three main SED types found in our candidate sample. While all SEDs broadly show increasing flux towards bluer wavelengths, they can be distinguished by whether they increase (left), stay constant (middle), or decrease (right) in flux when movin…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: A demonstration of the impact of extinction on the shape of the UV-optical SED. First column: A roughly 2M⊙ stripped star model with a range of extinctions applied at the metallicity of the LMC (top) and the SMC (bottom). Second column: We correct each stripped star m…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Results from performing SED fitting between our candidate sample and a grid of stripped star plus MS star binaries. LMC stars stare shown on the left and SMC stars on the right. Best-fit stripped star candidates cover a wide range of stripped star and companion MS sta…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: UV-optical color-magnitude diagrams that illustrate alternative objects that could exhibit UV excess within our candidate sample. In the left panel, we highlight systems likely belonging to the Magellanic Clouds, including theoretical models for rapidly accreting whit…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The average UV flux fraction versus the distance to the closest detected source in a SUMaC image for the 2,518 sources that pass all of the SED quality cuts described in § 5.4 and are bluewards of the ZAMS in a at least 4 out of the 9 UV-optical CMDs examined in this …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Galactic intermediate-mass stripped star with a Wolf-Rayet-like wind

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    WR 2-1 is the first unambiguous intermediate-mass stripped star in the Milky Way: a 3-6 solar mass, 60 kK helium-rich companion in a 5.94-day binary with a rapidly rotating O-star.

  2. Binary evolution at the extremes of mass-transfer efficiency: Contact, mergers, and population signatures

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fully conservative mass transfer raises the contact incidence from 11% to 62% and the stellar merger incidence from 16% to 38% in binary evolution models with 0.8 to 20 solar mass primaries.

  3. The Best Guess: Testing new and old formalisms for the common envelope against observations

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Forward-modeling 193 observed post-common-envelope binaries shows energy-based formalisms (α and Two-stage) match observations while the angular-momentum-based SCATTER formalism does not, with recombination energy con...

  4. Accretion from a shock-inflated companion: double-peaked supernova lightcurve with periodic modulations

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The study proposes that accretion from a shock-inflated companion star powers the double-peaked, periodically modulated lightcurve of SN2022jli and predicts associated gamma-ray and neutrino emission.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    z+If5 ެ zf ߑDKDkt-TIԌ xn D6-Y R[fHЬ Ysk0MJG:Dqk. 3m(=; ML'p2EvDR hIr &ЎI VYn(ZT8˄I ' |=uZtM^:

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  4. [4]

    F., & Drout , M

    Aadland , E., Massey , P., Neugent , K. F., & Drout , M. R. 2018, , 156, 294, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaeb96

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaeb96 2018

  5. [5]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  6. [6]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  7. [7]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  8. [8]

    2015, , 804, L25, 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L25

    Badenes , C., Maoz , D., & Ciardullo , R. 2015, , 804, L25, 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L25

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/l25 2015

Show all 215 references
  1. [9]

    2020, , 901, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe

    B \'e dard , A., Bergeron , P., Brassard , P., & Fontaine , G. 2020, , 901, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    P., Kanbur , S

    Bellinger , E. P., Kanbur , S. M., Bhardwaj , A., & Marconi , M. 2020, , 491, 4752, 10.1093/mnras/stz3292

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  4. [12]

    2017, , 230, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    Bianchi , L., Shiao , B., & Thilker , D. 2017, , 230, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Bodewits , D., Xing , Z., Saki , M., & Morgenthaler , J. P. 2023, Universe, 9, 78, 10.3390/universe9020078

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    C., Martins , F., Hillier , D

    Bouret , J. C., Martins , F., Hillier , D. J., et al. 2021, , 647, A134, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039890

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0, 1.5.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.6825092

    Bradley, L., Sipőcz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0, 1.5.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.6825092

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 1.13.0, 1.13.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.12585239

    Bradley, L., Sip o cz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 1.13.0, 1.13.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.12585239

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    A., Curran , P

    Breeveld , A. A., Curran , P. A., Hoversten , E. A., et al. 2010, , 406, 1687, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16832.x

    2010

  10. [18]

    1999, , 137, 117, 10.1051/aas:1999240

    Breysacher , J., Azzopardi , M., & Testor , G. 1999, , 137, 117, 10.1051/aas:1999240

    1999 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Hunter , I., et al

    Brott , I., Evans , C. J., Hunter , I., et al. 2011, , 530, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016114

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Breeveld , A

    Brown , P. J., Breeveld , A. A., Holland , S., Kuin , P., & Pritchard , T. 2014, , 354, 89, 10.1007/s10509-014-2059-8

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    2019, , 876, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16cf

    Chastenet , J., Sandstrom , K., Chiang , I.-D., et al. 2019, , 876, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16cf

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    E., Yungelson, L

    Chen, H.-L., Woods, T. E., Yungelson, L. R., Gilfanov, M., & Han, Z. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 3024, 10.1093/mnras/stv1865

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    2016, , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    2021, , 507, 4752, 10.1093/mnras/stab2446

    Choudhury , S., de Grijs , R., Bekki , K., et al. 2021, , 507, 4752, 10.1093/mnras/stab2446

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    H., Hill , J

    Cornett , R. H., Hill , J. K., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 1994, , 430, L117, 10.1086/187452

    1994 doi

  18. [26]

    H., Greason , M

    Cornett , R. H., Greason , M. R., Hill , J. K., et al. 1997, , 113, 1011, 10.1086/118317

    1997 doi

  19. [27]

    Crowther , P. A. 2007, , 45, 177, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S., Tandon , S

    Devaraj , A., Joseph , P., Stalin , C. S., Tandon , S. N., & Ghosh , S. K. 2023, , 946, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/acba9c

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    2010, , 712, 728, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/728

    Di Stefano , R. 2010, , 712, 728, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/728

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter , A. 2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    A., Margon , B., Homer , L., & Anderson , S

    Downes , R. A., Margon , B., Homer , L., & Anderson , S. F. 2004, , 128, 2288, 10.1086/425055

    2004 doi

  24. [32]

    S., Jeffery , C

    Drilling , J. S., Jeffery , C. S., Heber , U., Moehler , S., & Napiwotzki , R. 2013, , 551, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219433

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    R., G \"o tberg , Y., Ludwig , B

    Drout , M. R., G \"o tberg , Y., Ludwig , B. A., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.00061, 10.48550/arXiv.2307.00061

    2023 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    R., Soderberg , A

    Drout , M. R., Soderberg , A. M., Gal-Yam , A., et al. 2011, , 741, 97, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/97

    2011 doi

  27. [35]

    2024, , 685, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    Edenhofer , G., Zucker , C., Frank , P., et al. 2024, , 685, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Liebert , J., Harris , H

    Eisenstein , D. J., Liebert , J., Harris , H. C., et al. 2006, , 167, 40, 10.1086/507110

    2006 doi

  29. [37]

    J., & Howarth , I

    Evans , C. J., & Howarth , I. D. 2008, , 386, 826, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13012.x

    2008

  30. [38]

    2004, , 416, 291, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034459

    Foellmi , C. 2004, , 416, 291, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034459

    2004 doi

  31. [39]

    2012, , 539, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118220

    Fontaine , G., Brassard , P., Charpinet , S., et al. 2012, , 539, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118220

    2012 doi

  32. [40]

    For , B.-Q., Sneden , C., & Preston , G. W. 2011, , 197, 29, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/29

    2011 doi

  33. [41]

    2018, , 616, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832698

    Gaia Collaboration , Helmi , A., van Leeuwen , F., et al. 2018, , 616, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832698

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    2021, , 649, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039588

    Gaia Collaboration , Luri , X., Chemin , L., et al. 2021, , 649, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039588

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    A., Lindegren , L., et al

    Gaia Collaboration , Klioner , S. A., Lindegren , L., et al. 2022, , 667, A148, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243483

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    S., & Starrfield , S

    Gallagher , J. S., & Starrfield , S. 1978, , 16, 171, 10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.001131

    1978

  38. [46]

    1994, , 434, 306, 10.1086/174729

    Garcia-Berro , E., & Iben , I. 1994, , 434, 306, 10.1086/174729

    1994 doi

  39. [47]

    2004, , 611, 1005, 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels , N., Chincarini , G., Giommi , P., et al. 2004, , 611, 1005, 10.1086/422091

    2004 doi

  40. [48]

    2020, , 635, A193, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037526

    Geier , S. 2020, , 635, A193, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037526

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    M., Brasseur , C

    Ginsburg , A., Sip o cz , B. M., Brasseur , C. E., et al. 2019, , 157, 98, 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    2024, , 682, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346540

    G adkowski , M., Hajduk , M., Smolec , R., Szczerba , R., & Soszy \'n ski , I. 2024, , 682, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346540

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    A., Bianchi , L., & Manchado , A

    G \'o mez-Mu \ n oz , M. A., Bianchi , L., & Manchado , A. 2023, , 266, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/acca77

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    2015, , 578, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425362

    Gonz \'a lez-Fern \'a ndez , C., Dorda , R., Negueruela , I., & Marco , A. 2015, , 578, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425362

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    D., Cartledge , S., & Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Cartledge , S., & Clayton , G. C. 2009, , 705, 1320, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320

    2009 doi

  46. [54]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Clayton , G. C., Misselt , K. A., Landolt , A. U., & Wolff , M. J. 2003, , 594, 279, 10.1086/376774

    2003 doi

  47. [55]

    D., Fitzpatrick , E

    Gordon , K. D., Fitzpatrick , E. L., Massa , D., et al. 2024, , 970, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4be1

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    E., Groh , J

    G \"o tberg , Y., de Mink , S. E., Groh , J. H., et al. 2018, , 615, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732274

    2018 doi

  49. [57]

    E., Groh , J

    G \"o tberg , Y., de Mink , S. E., Groh , J. H., Leitherer , C., & Norman , C. 2019, , 629, A134, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834525

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    E., McQuinn , M., et al

    G \"o tberg , Y., de Mink , S. E., McQuinn , M., et al. 2020 a , , 634, A134, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936669

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    2020 b , , 904, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbda5

    G \"o tberg , Y., Korol , V., Lamberts , A., et al. 2020 b , , 904, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbda5

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    R., Ji , A

    G \"o tberg , Y., Drout , M. R., Ji , A. P., et al. 2023, , 959, 125, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace5a3

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    Gr \"a fener , G., Koesterke , L., & Hamann , W. R. 2002, , 387, 244, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020269

    2002 doi

  54. [62]

    Groenewegen , M. A. T. 2021, , 654, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140862

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    Hagen , L. M. Z., Siegel , M. H., Hoversten , E. A., et al. 2017, , 466, 4540, 10.1093/mnras/stw2954

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    2015, , 581, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526241

    Hainich , R., Pasemann , D., Todt , H., et al. 2015, , 581, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526241

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    2014, , 565, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322696

    Hainich , R., R \"u hling , U., Todt , H., et al. 2014, , 565, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322696

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    2014, , 561, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321682

    Hajduk , M., G adkowski , M., & Soszy \'n ski , I. 2014, , 561, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321682

    2014 doi

  59. [67]

    R., & Gr \"a fener , G

    Hamann , W. R., & Gr \"a fener , G. 2003, , 410, 993, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031308

    2003 doi

  60. [68]

    R., Pe \ n a , M., Gr \"a fener , G., & Ruiz , M

    Hamann , W. R., Pe \ n a , M., Gr \"a fener , G., & Ruiz , M. T. 2003, , 409, 969, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031109

    2003 doi

  61. [69]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    2004, , 127, 1531, 10.1086/381953

    Harris , J., & Zaritsky , D. 2004, , 127, 1531, 10.1086/381953

    2004 doi

  63. [71]

    2009, , 138, 1243, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

    ---. 2009, , 138, 1243, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

    2009 doi

  64. [72]

    2016, , 128, 082001, 10.1088/1538-3873/128/966/082001

    Heber , U. 2016, , 128, 082001, 10.1088/1538-3873/128/966/082001

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    W., Howarth , I

    Hilditch , R. W., Howarth , I. D., & Harries , T. J. 2005, , 357, 304, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08653.x

    2005

  66. [74]

    Hillier , D. J. 1990, , 231, 116

    1990

  67. [75]

    J., & Miller , D

    Hillier , D. J., & Miller , D. L. 1998, , 496, 407, 10.1086/305350

    1998 doi

  68. [76]

    T., Holoien , T

    Hinkle , J. T., Holoien , T. W. S., Shappee , B. J., & Auchettl , K. 2021, , 910, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe4d8

    2021 doi

  69. [77]

    L., Cohen , M., Ellis , R

    Hora , J. L., Cohen , M., Ellis , R. G., et al. 2008, , 135, 726, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/2/726

    2008 doi

  70. [78]

    K., & Subramanian , S

    Hota , S., Subramaniam , A., Nayak , P. K., & Subramanian , S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13605, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13605

    2024 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.05356, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.05356

    Hovis-Afflerbach , B., G \"o tberg , Y., Schootemeijer , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.05356, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.05356

    2024 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  73. [81]

    R., Tout , C

    Hurley , J. R., Tout , C. A., & Pols , O. R. 2002, , 329, 897, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    2002

  74. [82]

    Iglewicz , B., & Hoaglin , D. C. 1993, Volume 16: how to detect and handle outliers, ed. E. F. Mykytka (Quality Press)

    1993

  75. [83]

    T., Breedt , E., et al

    Inight , K., G \"a nsicke , B. T., Breedt , E., et al. 2023, , 524, 4867, 10.1093/mnras/stad2018

    2023 doi

  76. [84]

    2011, , 730, 76, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/76

    Ivanova , N. 2011, , 730, 76, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/76

    2011 doi

  77. [85]

    S., Bauer , E

    Jermyn , A. S., Bauer , E. B., Schwab , J., et al. 2023, , 265, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/acae8d

    2023 doi

  78. [86]

    1992, , 393, L79, 10.1086/186456

    Joblin , C., Leger , A., & Martin , P. 1992, , 393, L79, 10.1086/186456

    1992 doi

  79. [87]

    Jones, D., & Boffin, H. M. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0117

    2017

  80. [88]

    Kahabka , P., & van den Heuvel , E. P. J. 1997, , 35, 69, 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.69

    1997 doi

  81. [89]

    R., & Van Winckel , H

    Kamath , D., Wood , P. R., & Van Winckel , H. 2015, , 454, 1468, 10.1093/mnras/stv1202

    2015 doi

  82. [90]

    1994, , 437, 802, 10.1086/175041

    Kato , M., & Hachisu , I. 1994, , 437, 802, 10.1086/175041

    1994 doi

  83. [91]

    2014, , 793, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/136

    Kato , M., Saio , H., Hachisu , I., & Nomoto , K. 2014, , 793, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/136

    2014 doi

  84. [92]

    1988, , 328, 207, 10.1086/166282

    Kawai , Y., Saio , H., & Nomoto , K. 1988, , 328, 207, 10.1086/166282

    1988 doi

  85. [93]

    1967, , 65, 251

    Kippenhahn , R., & Weigert , A. 1967, , 65, 251

    1967

  86. [94]

    H., Gies , D

    Klement , R., Schaefer , G. H., Gies , D. R., et al. 2022, , 926, 213, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4266

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    2022, , 662, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142701

    Klencki , J., Istrate , A., Nelemans , G., & Pols , O. 2022, , 662, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142701

    2022 doi

  88. [96]

    2016, , 593, A101, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628433

    Krti c ka , J., Kub \'a t , J., & Krti c kov \'a , I. 2016, , 593, A101, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628433

    2016 doi

  89. [97]

    R., Harrison , F

    Kulkarni , S. R., Harrison , F. A., Grefenstette , B. W., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2111.15608. 2111.15608

    2021 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Kurucz , R. L. 1992, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 149, The Stellar Populations of Galaxies, ed. B. Barbuy & A. Renzini , 225

    1992

  91. [99]

    W., Mierle , K., Blanton , M., & Roweis , S

    Lang , D., Hogg , D. W., Mierle , K., Blanton , M., & Roweis , S. 2010, , 139, 1782, 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782

    2010 doi

  92. [100]

    W., & Mykytyn , D

    Lang , D., Hogg , D. W., & Mykytyn , D. 2016 a , The Tractor: Probabilistic astronomical source detection and measurement , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1604.008

    2016

  93. [101]

    W., & Schlegel , D

    Lang , D., Hogg , D. W., & Schlegel , D. J. 2016 b , , 151, 36, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/36

    2016 doi

  94. [102]

    Lau, M. Y. M., Hirai, R., Mandel, I., & Tout, C. A. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 966, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad3d50

    2024 doi

  95. [103]

    2023, , 953, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace25e

    Lei , Z., He , R., N \'e meth , P., et al. 2023, , 953, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace25e

    2023 doi

  96. [104]

    2013, , 771, 13, 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/13

    Lepo , K., & van Kerkwijk , M. 2013, , 771, 13, 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/13

    2013 doi

  97. [105]

    W., Higley , A

    Lyke , B. W., Higley , A. N., McLane , J. N., et al. 2020, , 250, 8, 10.3847/1538-4365/aba623

    2020 doi

  98. [106]

    D., Levan , A

    Lyman , J. D., Levan , A. J., James , P. A., et al. 2016, , 458, 1768, 10.1093/mnras/stw477

    2016 doi

  99. [107]

    F., Kasen , D., et al

    Ma , X., Hopkins , P. F., Kasen , D., et al. 2016, , 459, 3614, 10.1093/mnras/stw941

    2016 doi

  100. [108]

    2012, , 541, A54, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118712

    Ma \' z Apell \'a niz , J., & Rubio , M. 2012, , 541, A54, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118712

    2012 doi

  101. [109]

    2014, , 52, 107, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141031

    Maoz , D., Mannucci , F., & Nelemans , G. 2014, , 52, 107, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141031

    2014 doi

  102. [110]

    Massey , P., & Duffy , A. S. 2001, , 550, 713, 10.1086/319818

    2001 doi

  103. [111]

    F., & Levesque , E

    Massey , P., Neugent , K. F., & Levesque , E. M. 2019, , 157, 227, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1aa1

    2019 doi

  104. [112]

    F., & Morrell , N

    Massey , P., Neugent , K. F., & Morrell , N. 2015, , 807, 81, 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/81

    2015 doi

  105. [113]

    2017, , 837, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d17

    ---. 2017, , 837, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d17

    2017 doi

  106. [114]

    F., Morrell , N., & Hillier , D

    Massey , P., Neugent , K. F., Morrell , N., & Hillier , D. J. 2014, , 788, 83, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/83

    2014 doi

  107. [115]

    F., & Morrell , N

    Massey , P., Neugent , K. F., & Morrell , N. I. 2023, , 947, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc5ed

    2023 doi

  108. [116]

    Massey , P., Olsen , K. A. G., & Parker , J. W. 2003, , 115, 1265, 10.1086/379024

    2003 doi

  109. [117]

    2009, Science, 325, 1222, 10.1126/science.1176252

    Mereghetti, S., Tiengo, A., Esposito, P., et al. 2009, Science, 325, 1222, 10.1126/science.1176252

    2009 doi

  110. [118]

    Miller Bertolami , M. M. 2016, , 588, A25, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526577

    2016 doi

  111. [119]

    P., Cordoni , G., Marino , A

    Milone , A. P., Cordoni , G., Marino , A. F., et al. 2023, , 672, A161, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244798

    2023 doi

  112. [120]

    D., Meilland, A., et al

    Mourard, D., Monnier, J. D., Meilland, A., et al. 2015, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 577, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425141

    2015 doi

  113. [121]

    E., Hasselquist , S., Peek , J

    Murray , C. E., Hasselquist , S., Peek , J. E. G., et al. 2024, , 962, 120, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1591

    2024 doi

  114. [122]

    R., & Portegies Zwart , S

    Nelemans , G., Yungelson , L. R., & Portegies Zwart , S. F. 2004, , 349, 181, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07479.x

    2004

  115. [123]

    F., Massey , P., Hillier , D

    Neugent , K. F., Massey , P., Hillier , D. J., & Morrell , N. 2017, , 841, 20, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6e51

    2017 doi

  116. [124]

    F., Massey , P., & Morrell , N

    Neugent , K. F., Massey , P., & Morrell , N. 2012 a , , 144, 162, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/6/162

    2012 doi

  117. [125]

    2018, , 863, 181, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad17d

    ---. 2018, , 863, 181, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad17d

    2018 doi

  118. [126]

    F., Massey , P., Skiff , B., & Meynet , G

    Neugent , K. F., Massey , P., Skiff , B., & Meynet , G. 2012 b , , 749, 177, 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/177

    2012 doi

  119. [127]

    1979, , 31, 287

    Nomoto , K., Nariai , K., & Sugimoto , D. 1979, , 31, 287

    1979

  120. [128]

    2007, , 663, 1269, 10.1086/518465

    Nomoto , K., Saio , H., Kato , M., & Hachisu , I. 2007, , 663, 1269, 10.1086/518465

    2007 doi

  121. [129]

    Nugis , T., & Lamers , H. J. G. L. M. 2000, , 360, 227

    2000

  122. [130]

    O., Kushnir , D., Polishook , D., et al

    Ofek , E. O., Kushnir , D., Polishook , D., et al. 2024, , 527, 10507, 10.1093/mnras/stad3707

    2024 doi

  123. [131]

    O'Grady , A. J. G., Drout , M. R., Neugent , K. F., et al. 2024, , 975, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad778a

    2024 doi

  124. [132]

    O'Grady , A. J. G., Drout , M. R., Gaensler , B. M., et al. 2023, , 943, 18, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca655

    2023 doi

  125. [133]

    A., Wolf , C., Bessell , M

    Onken , C. A., Wolf , C., Bessell , M. S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.02015, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.02015

    2024 doi

  126. [134]

    2010, , 717, 739, 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/739

    Orio , M., Nelson , T., Bianchini , A., Di Mille , F., & Harbeck , D. 2010, , 717, 739, 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/739

    2010 doi

  127. [135]

    J., Brindle , C., Talavera , A., et al

    Page , M. J., Brindle , C., Talavera , A., et al. 2012, , 426, 903, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21706.x

    2012

  128. [136]

    J., Yershov , V., Breeveld , A., et al

    Page , M. J., Yershov , V., Breeveld , A., et al. 2014, in Proceedings of Swift: 10 Years of Discovery (SWIFT 10), 37. 1503.06597

    2014 arXiv

  129. [137]

    2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  130. [138]

    W., Hill , J

    Parker , J. W., Hill , J. K., Cornett , R. H., et al. 1998, , 116, 180, 10.1086/300419

    1998 doi

  131. [139]

    2011, , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton , B., Bildsten , L., Dotter , A., et al. 2011, , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  132. [140]

    2013, , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton , B., Cantiello , M., Arras , P., et al. 2013, , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  133. [141]

    2015, , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton , B., Marchant , P., Schwab , J., et al. 2015, , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  134. [142]

    B., et al

    Paxton , B., Schwab , J., Bauer , E. B., et al. 2018, , 234, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  135. [143]

    2019, , 243, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    Paxton , B., Smolec , R., Schwab , J., et al. 2019, , 243, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  136. [144]

    J., & Mamajek , E

    Pecaut , M. J., & Mamajek , E. E. 2013, , 208, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    2013 doi

  137. [145]

    Peterson , B. M. 1997, An Introduction to Active Galactic Nuclei (Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Press)

    1997

  138. [146]

    Pickles , A. J. 1998, , 110, 863, 10.1086/316197

    1998 doi

  139. [147]

    2013, , 495, 76, 10.1038/nature11878

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Graczyk , D., Gieren , W., et al. 2013, , 495, 76, 10.1038/nature11878

    2013 doi

  140. [148]

    S., Breeveld , A

    Poole , T. S., Breeveld , A. A., Page , M. J., et al. 2008, , 383, 627, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12563.x

    2008

  141. [149]

    Ramachandran , V., Klencki , J., Sander , A. A. C., et al. 2023, , 674, L12, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346818

    2023 doi

  142. [150]

    Ramachandran , V., Sander , A. A. C., Pauli , D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.17678, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.17678

    2024 doi arXiv

  143. [151]

    A., & Parker , Q

    Reid , W. A., & Parker , Q. A. 2006, , 373, 521, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11087.x

    2006

  144. [152]

    E., et al

    Renzo , M., Zapartas , E., de Mink , S. E., et al. 2019, , 624, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833297

    2019 doi

  145. [153]

    2024, Classical Be stars, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.06882

    Rivinius, T., & Klement, R. 2024, Classical Be stars, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.06882

    2024 doi

  146. [154]

    2020, in XIV.0 Scientific Meeting (virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society, 182

    Rodrigo , C., & Solano , E. 2020, in XIV.0 Scientific Meeting (virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society, 182

    2020

  147. [155]

    Roming , P. W. A., Kennedy , T. E., Mason , K. O., et al. 2005, , 120, 95, 10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4

    2005 doi

  148. [156]

    2018, , 478, 5017, 10.1093/mnras/sty1279

    Rubele , S., Pastorelli , G., Girardi , L., et al. 2018, , 478, 5017, 10.1093/mnras/sty1279

    2018 doi

  149. [158]

    J., Anderson, J., et al

    Sabbi, E., Lennon, D. J., Anderson, J., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 222, 11, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/11

    2016 doi

  150. [159]

    E., de Koter , A., et al

    Sana , H., de Mink , S. E., de Koter , A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444, 10.1126/science.1223344

    2012 doi

  151. [160]

    2015, , 577, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425356

    Sander , A., Shenar , T., Hainich , R., et al. 2015, , 577, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425356

    2015 doi

  152. [161]

    Sander , A. A. C., & Vink , J. S. 2020, , 499, 873, 10.1093/mnras/staa2712

    2020 doi

  153. [162]

    K., Heiger , M., Badenes , C., et al

    Sarbadhicary , S. K., Heiger , M., Badenes , C., et al. 2021, , 912, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/abca86

    2021 doi

  154. [163]

    N., Geier , S., & Kupfer , T

    Schaffenroth , V., Pelisoli , I., Barlow , B. N., Geier , S., & Kupfer , T. 2022, , 666, A182, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244214

    2022 doi

  155. [164]

    Schneider , F. R. N., Ram \' rez-Agudelo , O. H., Tramper , F., et al. 2018, , 618, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833433

    2018 doi

  156. [165]

    Secunda , A., Cen , R., Kimm , T., G \"o tberg , Y., & de Mink , S. E. 2020, , 901, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/abaefa

    2020 doi

  157. [166]

    2021, , 908, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd2b4

    Shao , Y., & Li , X.-D. 2021, , 908, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd2b4

    2021 doi

  158. [167]

    S., Sana , H., & Sander , A

    Shenar , T., Gilkis , A., Vink , J. S., Sana , H., & Sander , A. A. C. 2020, , 634, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936948

    2020 doi

  159. [168]

    P., Hainich , R., et al

    Shenar , T., Sablowski , D. P., Hainich , R., et al. 2019, , 627, A151, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935684

    2019 doi

  160. [169]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14593, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14593

    Shenar , T., Bodensteiner , J., Sana , H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14593, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14593

    2024 doi

  161. [170]

    A., Hagen , L., & Hoversten , E

    Siegel , M., Gronwall , C. A., Hagen , L., & Hoversten , E. A. 2014, in Proceedings of Swift: 10 Years of Discovery (SWIFT 10, 42

    2014

  162. [171]

    H., Porterfield , B

    Siegel , M. H., Porterfield , B. L., Balzer , B. G., & Hagen , L. M. Z. 2015, , 150, 129, 10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/129

    2015 doi

  163. [172]

    2014, Advances in Space Research, 53, 939, 10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.016

    Simons , R., Thilker , D., Bianchi , L., & Wyder , T. 2014, Advances in Space Research, 53, 939, 10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.016

    2014 doi

  164. [173]

    V., & Chornock , R

    Smith , N., Li , W., Filippenko , A. V., & Chornock , R. 2011, , 412, 1522, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.17229.x

    2011

  165. [174]

    2015, , 447, 598, 10.1093/mnras/stu2430

    Smith , N., & Tombleson , R. 2015, , 447, 598, 10.1093/mnras/stu2430

    2015 doi

  166. [175]

    E., Phinney, E

    Soberman, G. E., Phinney, E. S., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1997, Stability criteria for mass transfer in binary stellar evolution., arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9703016

    1997 doi arXiv

  167. [176]

    2022, , 660, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141915

    Souchay , J., Secrest , N., Lambert , S., et al. 2022, , 660, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141915

    2022 doi

  168. [177]

    E., & Diaz , M

    Steiner , J. E., & Diaz , M. P. 1998, , 110, 276, 10.1086/316139

    1998 doi

  169. [178]

    2009, , 496, 399, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811029

    Subramanian , S., & Subramaniam , A. 2009, , 496, 399, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811029

    2009 doi

  170. [179]

    2015, , 581, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526617

    Sz \'e csi , D., Langer , N., Yoon , S.-C., et al. 2015, , 581, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526617

    2015 doi

  171. [180]

    N., Subramaniam , A., Girish , V., et al

    Tandon , S. N., Subramaniam , A., Girish , V., et al. 2017, , 154, 128, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8451

    2017 doi

  172. [181]

    M., Langer , N., & Podsiadlowski , P

    Tauris , T. M., Langer , N., & Podsiadlowski , P. 2015, , 451, 2123, 10.1093/mnras/stv990

    2015 doi

  173. [182]

    M., Kramer , M., Freire , P

    Tauris , T. M., Kramer , M., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2017, , 846, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89

    2017 doi

  174. [183]

    Taylor , M. B. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, ed. P. Shopbell , M. Britton , & R. Ebert , 29

    2005

  175. [184]

    Taylor , M. B. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, ed. C. Gabriel , C. Arviset , D. Ponz , & S. Enrique , 666

    2006

  176. [185]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody , D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford , 733, 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  177. [186]

    1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Tody , D. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch , R. J. V. Brissenden , & J. Barnes , 173

    1993

  178. [187]

    van den Heuvel , E. P. J., Bhattacharya , D., Nomoto , K., & Rappaport , S. A. 1992, , 262, 97

    1992

  179. [188]

    2003, , 41, 391, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.071601.170018

    van Winckel , H. 2003, , 41, 391, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.071601.170018

    2003

  180. [189]

    E., et al

    Vasilopoulos , G., Koliopanos , F., Woods , T. E., et al. 2020, , 499, 2007, 10.1093/mnras/staa2922

    2020 doi

  181. [190]

    Vink , J. S. 2017, , 607, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731902

    2017 doi

  182. [191]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  183. [192]

    R., & Blades , J

    Walborn , N. R., & Blades , J. C. 1997, , 112, 457, 10.1086/313043

    1997 doi

  184. [193]

    2024, , 975, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad86b7

    Wang , C., Bodensteiner , J., Xu , X.-T., et al. 2024, , 975, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad86b7

    2024 doi

  185. [194]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.15289

    Wang , L., Li , J., Wu , Y., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.15289. 2203.15289

    2022 arXiv

  186. [195]

    1995, Cataclysmic variable stars , Vol

    Warner , B. 1995, Cataclysmic variable stars , Vol. 28

    1995

  187. [196]

    A., & Gamen , R

    Weidmann , W. A., & Gamen , R. 2011, , 526, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913984

    2011 doi

  188. [197]

    2000, , 143, 9, 10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger , M., Ochsenbein , F., Egret , D., et al. 2000, , 143, 9, 10.1051/aas:2000332

    2000 doi

  189. [198]

    2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed

    W es M c K inney. 2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed. S t\'efan van der W alt & J arrod M illman, 56 -- 61, 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    2010 doi

  190. [199]

    Y., & Browne , S

    Wheatley , J., Welsh , B. Y., & Browne , S. E. 2012, , 124, 552, 10.1086/666593

    2012 doi

  191. [200]

    M., Welsh , B

    Wheatley , J. M., Welsh , B. Y., & Browne , S. E. 2008, , 136, 259, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/259

    2008 doi

  192. [201]

    M., Welsh , B

    Wheatley , J. M., Welsh , B. Y., Siegmund , O. H. W., et al. 2005, , 619, L123, 10.1086/422391

    2005 doi

  193. [202]

    M., Bildsten , L., Brooks , J., & Paxton , B

    Wolf , W. M., Bildsten , L., Brooks , J., & Paxton , B. 2013, , 777, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/136

    2013 doi

  194. [203]

    Wong , T. L. S., & Schwab , J. 2019, , 878, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b49

    2019 doi

  195. [204]

    E., & Gilfanov , M

    Woods , T. E., & Gilfanov , M. 2016, , 455, 1770, 10.1093/mnras/stv2423

    2016 doi

  196. [205]

    2020, , 634, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935792

    Wu , Y., Chen , X., Chen , H., Li , Z., & Han , Z. 2020, , 634, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935792

    2020 doi

  197. [206]

    M., Johnson , L

    Yanchulova Merica-Jones , P., Sandstrom , K. M., Johnson , L. C., et al. 2017, , 847, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8a67

    2017 doi

  198. [207]

    2025, , 978, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8eb7

    Yanchulova Merica-Jones , P., Gordon , K., Sandstrom , K., et al. 2025, , 978, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8eb7

    2025 doi

  199. [208]

    2017, , 840, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afe

    Yoon , S.-C., Dessart , L., & Clocchiatti , A. 2017, , 840, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afe

    2017 doi

  200. [209]

    2024, , 683, A37, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347806

    Yungelson , L., Kuranov , A., Postnov , K., et al. 2024, , 683, A37, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347806

    2024 doi

  201. [210]

    T., Girard , T

    Zacharias , N., Finch , C. T., Girard , T. M., et al. 2013, , 145, 44, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/44

    2013 doi

  202. [211]

    E., Van Dyk , S

    Zapartas , E., de Mink , S. E., Van Dyk , S. D., et al. 2017, , 842, 125, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7467

    2017 doi

  203. [212]

    1999, , 118, 2824, 10.1086/301131

    Zaritsky , D. 1999, , 118, 2824, 10.1086/301131

    1999 doi

  204. [213]

    1997, , 114, 1002, 10.1086/118531

    Zaritsky , D., Harris , J., & Thompson , I. 1997, , 114, 1002, 10.1086/118531

    1997 doi

  205. [214]

    B., & Grebel , E

    Zaritsky , D., Harris , J., Thompson , I. B., & Grebel , E. K. 2004, , 128, 1606, 10.1086/423910

    2004 doi

  206. [215]

    B., Grebel , E

    Zaritsky , D., Harris , J., Thompson , I. B., Grebel , E. K., & Massey , P. 2002, , 123, 855, 10.1086/338437

    2002 doi

  207. [216]

    A., & Bredthauer, G

    Zaritsky, D., Schectman, S. A., & Bredthauer, G. 1996, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 108, 104, 10.1086/133698

    1996 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.