Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 186 references

Stellar populations of quasar host galaxies with MFICA decomposition

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Around a quarter of all quasars are hosted by post-starburst galaxies—28 times the rate in mass-matched inactive galaxies—implying that 30–50% of quasars are triggered by gas-rich major mergers.

desk verdict First MFICA census of quasar host stellar populations, with a plausible 25% post-starburst claim that needs an out-of-subspace validation before the exact number is trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.10271 v1 pith:QEIE2NG7 submitted 2025-09-12 astro-ph.GA

Sahyadri Devidatt Krishna , Vivienne Wild , Paul C. Hewett , Carolin Villforth This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords quasarhostgalaxiespost-starburstindependentcomponentanalysisspectraldecompositionstellarpopulationsgalaxymergersAGNfeedingSloanDigitalSkySurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a blind source-separation technique, Mean-Field Independent Component Analysis (MFICA), to pry host-galaxy light out of optical quasar spectra and read off each host's recent star-formation history. Applied to roughly 3,400 Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars at $0.16 \leq z \leq 0.76$, the decomposition yields a census: about 53 per cent of quasar hosts are star-forming, 17 per cent sit in the green valley, 5 per cent are quiescent, and roughly 25 per cent are post-starburst galaxies—hosts that underwent a starburst and then stopped forming stars within the past billion years. The post-starburst fraction is $28\pm1$ times higher than in a stellar-mass-matched control sample of inactive galaxies, and $7.3\pm0.4$ times higher per star-forming galaxy. The authors interpret this excess as evidence that 30–50 per cent of quasars are preceded by gas-rich major mergers, with the remaining majority fed by secular processes.

What carries the argument

The central object is Mean-Field Independent Component Analysis (MFICA), a blind source-separation method that decomposes spectra into statistically independent, positivity-constrained components without the whitening step that distorts PCA-based templates. The paper trains MFICA on separate galaxy and quasar samples to build a small template set: three stellar-population components (K for old K-giant-like light, AF for intermediate-age A/F stars marked by strong Balmer absorption, OB for young stars and active star formation) plus emission-line components, and seven quasar components with corrective terms. A quasar spectrum is fit as a single linear combination of galaxy and quasar components, and the fractional weights $f_K$, $f_{AF}$, and $f_{OB}$ assign the host to starburst, star-forming, post-starburst, green-valley, or quiescent categories. The AF component is the load-bearing feature: its weight traces the post-starburst population on which the central excess claim rests.

What would settle it

Compare the A-star component weight for quasars whose host galaxies can be observed independently—spatially resolved integral-field data, or hosts bright enough to dominate the spectrum—against Balmer absorption measured directly in the host light; a host that is demonstrably not post-starburst but carries a large A-star weight would expose the 25 per cent fraction as an artifact. A cheaper computational version injects real quasar spectra (not MFICA reconstructions) with synthetic host galaxies of known type and checks whether residual quasar diversity is misattributed to the A-star component.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is the post-starburst excess: roughly 25 per cent of quasars in the redshift range $0.16 \leq z \leq 0.76$ are hosted by post-starburst galaxies, versus less than 1 per cent of stellar-mass-matched inactive galaxies, a $28\pm1$-fold excess. Because quasar hosts are massive galaxies (median fibre stellar mass $10^{10.8}\,M_\odot$, total near $10^{11.3}\,M_\odot$) and massive post-starbursts are predominantly merger products, the paper argues that 30–50 per cent of quasars follow a merger-triggered sequence of starburst, rapid quenching, and black hole growth. The remaining majority—star-forming hosts on the main sequence—are interpreted as a separate, secular feeding mode in which black hole growth keeps step with star formation through a shared gas supply. The paper frames this as two parallel feeding modes for supermassive black holes, and notes that the post-starburst excess is quantitatively robust to the stellar-mass prescription while the exact star-forming-versus-quiescent split is more sensitive to it.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the tiny A-star component (about 2 per cent of quasar light) records genuine host-galaxy starlight, because the mock spectra used for validation were built from the method's own quasar components and so never test whether real quasar spectral diversity outside that component set leaks into the A-star signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quasars are not a random subset of massive galaxies: the mass-matched control sample is 74 per cent quiescent while only ~5 per cent of quasar hosts are, so young stellar populations and luminous black hole accretion are causally linked, directly or indirectly.
  • A quarter of quasars show evidence of a recent starburst followed by rapid quenching, connecting luminous AGN activity to a short-lived host phase and constraining when feedback shuts off star formation.
  • If most massive post-starburst galaxies are merger remnants, then 30–50 per cent of quasars are merger-induced, in line with morphological merger fractions for luminous AGNs (~0.37–0.41) cited in the paper.
  • The majority of quasars (~53 per cent) live in normally star-forming hosts, implying that secular feeding—bars, minor mergers, disk instabilities—carries the bulk of black hole growth.
  • The post-starburst excess is quantitatively robust to the exact host stellar-mass calibration, whereas the precise star-forming/quiescent split is sensitive to it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A duty-cycle argument could turn the $28\pm1$ excess into a causal timescale: if post-starburst hosts stay recognizable for roughly 0.5–1 Gyr while quasar episodes last about $10^7$ yr, random coincidence would predict a far smaller overlap, so the observed excess implies quasars are actively triggered during or immediately after the post-starburst window.
  • The AF component might partially absorb quasar-side spectral diversity that falls outside the trained quasar subspace, since real quasar continua may contain weak Balmer features; this is testable by checking whether the AF weight tracks host properties rather than quasar luminosity or redshift.
  • The same decomposition could be applied to Type-2 AGN hosts and to higher-redshift surveys with matched rest-frame coverage, providing a consistency check on whether the post-starburst excess grows or shrinks with AGN luminosity.
  • Extending the decomposition redward to include features like the Mg I triplet could catch older post-starburst populations, testing whether the true merger-triggered fraction lies at the bottom or top of the paper's 30–50 per cent range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Mean-Field Independent Component Analysis (MFICA) to decompose SDSS DR7 quasar spectra into quasar and host-galaxy components, using the galaxy component fractions f_K, f_AF, and f_OB to classify host galaxies by recent star-formation history. After validating the decomposition with mock spectra, the authors apply it to 3376 quasars with f_gal >= 0.2 and S/N >= 10, compare the resulting host types with a stellar-mass-matched control sample, and report that roughly 53 per cent of quasar hosts are star-forming or starburst, about 5 per cent are quiescent, and approximately 25 per cent are post-starburst, corresponding to a 28 +/- 1 excess relative to controls. The paper interprets the post-starburst excess as evidence that 30-50 per cent of quasars originate from merger-induced starbursts, with the remainder secularly fed.

Significance. If the decomposition is unbiased, this is one of the first large spectroscopic censuses of the stellar populations of unobscured quasar hosts, and the mass-matched control comparison makes the claims substantially stronger than a simple host-type census. The claimed 28 +/- 1 post-starburst excess is a striking result that, if robust, materially strengthens the case for merger-triggered quasar activity in a subpopulation of quasars. The paper has clear strengths: the mock construction uses galaxy composites that are out of the MFICA galaxy subspace, the classification criteria are stated explicitly, the covariance-based error propagation is careful, and the analysis is reproducible with public SDSS data and published templates. The central quantitative claims rest on the recovered AF-component weight and on visually defined classification boundaries, and both of these ingredients currently lack direct robustness tests that bear on the headline percentages.

major comments (3)
  1. [4.2(ii), 5.2, 7(iii)] Section 4.2(ii) constructs every mock quasar as an MFICA reconstruction of the quasar training sample, so all mock quasars lie exactly inside the quasar-component subspace. The validation therefore does not test whether the small AF component (average roughly 2 per cent of quasar light; Section 2.4.2) can be separated from real quasar spectral diversity that falls outside that subspace, such as broad Balmer emission residuals, Fe II pseudo-continuum, BAL or associated absorption, or continuum-shape variations. Because the post-starburst classification in Section 3.2 is defined directly in f_AF-f_K space, a systematic AF contamination of even a few per cent could move hosts across the PSB boundary and change the quoted 24.9 +/- 0.6 per cent and the 28 +/- 1 excess, whose quoted errors are formal covariance errors only. Please add an out-of-subspace test, for example by adding quasar residual spectra (PCA components or galaxy-subtracted real quasar residuals) to the mock quasar inputs and quantifying the induced bias in f_AF.
  2. [3.2, Table 1, 7(iii)] The classification boundaries in Fig. 5 are defined visually and are described as somewhat arbitrary, yet they directly determine all percentages in Table 1 and the central excess quoted in Section 7(iii). The paper does not quantify how the post-starburst fraction or the 28 +/- 1 excess responds to plausible shifts in these boundaries. Please provide a boundary-sensitivity analysis, for example by perturbing each boundary by the typical scatter of the galaxy classifications or by the width of the post-starburst locus, and report the resulting range on the headline percentages.
  3. [5, Fig. 10] Section 5 states that the sample is limited to quasars with chi-squared_nu >= 2.0, while the caption of Fig. 10 and the text around it use chi-squared_nu < 2.0; the sentence describing the lim it is internally inconsistent. Please correct the inequality and justify the chosen threshold, since this cut determines the sample of 3376 quasars on which all science results are based.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3), Eq. (5)] The summation limits in Eq. (3) and Eq. (5) appear to be off by one relative to the stated number of components (seven galaxy components and ten quasar components); please make the indexing and component counts consistent.
  2. [4.2(ii)] The text says the quasar mocks 'represent the full diversity of spectra seen across the quasar population', but since they are MFICA reconstructions they only represent diversity inside the quasar-component subspace; please temper this wording to match what is actually tested.
  3. [4.3] The statement that the decomposition was also tested using real galaxy spectra rather than high-S/N composites is not accompanied by any quantitative result or figure; please provide the recovery accuracy for that test.
  4. [5.3] The claim that the post-starburst fraction is 'quantitatively robust' to the host-subtraction prescription would be easier to evaluate if the paper reported the PSB fractions obtained in the two variant decompositions rather than only the resulting stellar-mass changes.
  5. [7(ii)] There is a typo in item (ii): 'quiscent/red' should read 'quiescent/red'.
  6. [Fig. 14, Table 1] Figure 14 error bars are described as the maximum and minimum percentages from 10,000 resamples, while Table 1 reports standard deviations; please state explicitly which quantity is displayed and why the two differ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No derivation in the paper reduces to its inputs; the central post-starburst excess is an empirical classification count compared against an external control sample, and the mock-validation in-subspace construction is a limitation rather than circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: train MFICA components on galaxy and quasar spectra; define galaxy star-formation-history classes by f_K/f_AF boundaries from the galaxy training sample; validate recovery with mock spectra; apply the decomposition to SDSS quasars; and compare the resulting host classifications with a stellar-mass-matched control sample. At no point does an equation make the headline quantities equal to a fitted input. The 24.9±0.6 per cent post-starburst fraction and the 28±1 excess are counts of quasars falling in a pre-defined region of component-fraction space, compared with the same region for control galaxies; these counts are not constrained by construction to equal the training fractions or the mock recipe. The AF component is built from post-starburst galaxy spectra and the classification boundary is drawn in f_AF-f_K space, but that is an operational definition of the label, not a derivation of the excess. The mock validation (Section 4.2, item ii) constructs quasar inputs as MFICA reconstructions of the quasar training sample, so it certifies separation only for quasar spectral diversity inside the quasar-component subspace; the paper itself acknowledges the deeper limitation that real host properties are unknown ('We cannot, however, test our assumption using real quasar spectra', Section 4.2). Real quasar spectral structure that projects onto the AF subspace could bias f_AF, but this is a systematic-uncertainty risk in applying a blind decomposition, not a circular reduction of the claimed result. Section 5.3 explicitly tests sensitivity to the host-subtraction prescription and reports the post-starburst excess as quantitatively robust, which is the appropriate response to that risk. No load-bearing result is justified only by self-citation: Wild et al. (2007) and related work are used for training-sample stratification and comparison, but the MFICA components and the quasar-host measurements are computed here from SDSS spectra, and the control comparison is external. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is merely relabelled. The out-of-subspace validation gap is a real caveat for future work, but it does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demographic percentages depend on two fitted elements: the visually chosen classification boundaries and the thresholds (f_gal >= 0.2, S/N >= 10) set by mock tests. The random forest stellar masses are also learned from data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Classification boundaries in f_K-f_AF space = Set of five linear inequalities (Section 3.2)
    Defined visually to separate known galaxy types in the MFICA parent galaxy training sample; applied unchanged to quasar hosts to produce all reported percentages.
  • Host galaxy fraction threshold = f_gal >= 0.2
    Chosen from mock spectral tests where component recovery becomes accurate; selects 3376 of 19,358 quasars.
  • Signal-to-noise threshold = median S/N >= 10
    Chosen from mock tests as the limit above which component fraction confidence contours do not overlap.
  • Chi-squared quality cut = Inconsistent in text: >=2.0 in Section 5, <2.0 in Fig. 10 caption
    Used to select reliably decomposed quasars; the inconsistency needs resolution for exact replication.
  • Number of MFICA components = 7 galaxy plus 10 quasar components
    Chosen to balance reconstruction accuracy against degeneracies between galaxy and quasar features.
  • Rest-frame wavelength range = 3300-5200 Å
    Chosen to include Balmer and 4000 Å breaks plus key quasar features; sets the redshift limits of the sample.
  • Random forest mass-to-light estimator = 100 estimators trained on f_AF and f_K to predict M/L (0.084 dex scatter)
    Learned mapping from MFICA component fractions to fibre stellar mass; defines the mass-matched control sample.
  • Aperture correction = 0.5 dex added to fibre masses
    Fixed correction from the literature to estimate total stellar masses; not used in the star formation history comparison itself.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption A quasar spectrum is a linear combination of galaxy and quasar components (Eq. 5).
    The entire decomposition rests on the additivity of AGN and galaxy light in the observed spectrum.
  • domain assumption MFICA with positivity priors produces components with physical meaning, i.e., the K, AF and OB components trace old, intermediate-age and young stellar populations.
    Validated against Hdelta_A and Dn4000 indices on galaxy spectra (Section 3.1), but the mapping is not guaranteed for embedded host light.
  • domain assumption The AF component is recoverable without bias when it contributes only about 2% of the light in a quasar spectrum.
    Mock tests use quasar inputs built from MFICA reconstructions, so they do not probe this small-component recovery against out-of-subspace quasar diversity.
  • domain assumption Quasar SEDs are independent of luminosity and redshift apart from the Baldwin effect, and dust-reddened quasars are removed, so templates trained on M_i < -23 quasars apply to the full sample.
    Stated in Section 2.3.2 with reference to Temple et al. (2021).
  • domain assumption Massive post-starburst galaxies are predominantly caused by gas-rich major mergers (about 90% show merger signatures at these masses, per Ellison et al. 2024).
    This external result converts the measured post-starburst excess into the claim that 30 to 50% of quasars are merger-induced.
  • domain assumption The 0.5 dex aperture correction and the MPA-JHU fibre stellar masses are accurate for both quasar hosts and the control sample.
    A mismatch at the high-mass end is acknowledged in Section 5.1 and shown not to change the qualitative results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stellar populations of quasar host galaxies with MFICA decomposition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QEIE2NG7

@misc{pith2026250910271,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stellar populations of quasar host galaxies with MFICA decomposition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QEIE2NG7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10271}
}
abstract

Galaxy evolution theories require co-evolution between accreting supermassive black holes (SMBH) and galaxies to explain many properties of the local galaxy population, yet observational evidence for the mechanisms driving this co-evolution is lacking. The recent star-formation histories of the host galaxies of accreting SMBHs (Active Galactic Nuclei, AGNs) can help constrain the processes that feed SMBHs and halt star formation in galaxies, but are difficult to obtain for the most luminous AGNs (quasars). We introduce Mean-Field Independent Component Analysis (MFICA) to decompose quasar spectra and obtain recent star formation histories of their host galaxies. Applying MFICA to quasar spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR7 Quasar Catalogue in the redshift range $0.16 \leq z \leq 0.76$, we find that 53 per cent of quasar host galaxies are star-forming, 17 per cent lie in the green-valley, while only 5 per cent are quiescent. This contrasts with 14, 11, and 74 per cent of a mass-matched control sample that are star-forming, green-valley, and quiescent, respectively. We find that $\sim25$ per cent of quasars are hosted by post-starburst galaxies, an excess of $28\pm1$ compared to our control sample. While the heterogeneity of recent star formation histories implies multiple SMBH feeding mechanisms, the excess of post-starburst host galaxies demonstrates the link between accreting SMBHs and a recent starburst followed by rapid quenching. Given that massive post-starburst galaxies are predominantly caused by gas-rich major mergers, our results indicate that $30-50$ per cent of quasars originate from merger-induced starbursts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10271 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The MFICA galaxy components ( 𝑓𝜆). From top to bottom: the K component, AF component and OB component. 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 0 50 100 150 Normalised Flux GAL4 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 0 50 100 150 Normalised Flux GAL5 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 Wavelength (Å) 0 50 100 150 200 Normalised Flux GAL6 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 Wavelength (Å) … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The MFICA emission line components (GAL4-GAL6) and the corrective component (bottom right; GAL7). of the K component from each spectrum, giving us training spectra free of old stellar population light. This step impacts the measured stellar mass of the host galaxies, and is slightly sensitive to the input quasar sample and the wavelength range of the components. We test our results with and without this step, and no… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The MFICA quasar components ( 𝑓𝜆), after subtraction of host-galaxy contamination. The first seven components (QSO1-7) are the main positive components. The remaining three (QSOcorr1-3) are the corrective components generated with no positivity constraint. our ability to recover the galaxy stellar population, due to the corre￾lation between H ii region nebular emission and stellar continuum shape. To do this, we fir… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stacked spectra and stacked reconstructions demonstrating the effectiveness of MFICA galaxy reconstructions. Upper panel of each subplot: The stacked (mean) spectra and stacked MFICA galaxy component fits of all spectra of a given galaxy spectral type are plotted in bl…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scatter plots of galaxy component fractions, derived from fitting the parent galaxy sample with the MFICA galaxy components. Galaxy component fractions (dots) are colour coded by specific star-formation rate (sSFR) from Brinchmann et al. (2004). Left: K-component vs. A…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Demonstration of how a change in AF or OB component fraction corresponds to a change in shape of a galaxy spectrum. Left: AF-component vs. OB-component fraction of the parent galaxy sample. The black boxes demarcate regions from where galaxy spectra were stacked. The s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results from mock spectra to demonstrate the fractional accuracy of host galaxy fraction ( 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙) recovered from the MFICA quasar spectral decomposition, as a function of the true 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙. The dashed line represents the lower limit of 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙 = 0.1 below which the recovered 𝑓…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Scatter plots of the galaxy component fractions from decomposing mock quasar+galaxy spectra with a median S/N of 10 and 0.2 ≤ 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙 ≤ 0.9, i.e. in the limits where the decomposition is accurate. Crosses represent the true component fractions and contours represent the c…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The left panel shows an example of the decomposition of a quasar spectrum. Top: The quasar spectrum (blue), best-fit MFICA model (black), reconstructed host galaxy (green) and reconstructed quasar (red). Bottom: The difference between the quasar spectrum and the best f…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Variation in host galaxy fraction as a function of redshift for quasars with 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙 ≥ 0.2, median 𝑆/𝑁 ≥ 10 and 𝜒 2 𝜈 < 2.0. The colours correspond to the bolometric luminosity of the quasars (Shen et al. 2011). The grey filled circles represent the median 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙 in redshi…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: The normalised histograms of the stellar masses for the quasar host galaxies (solid blue) and the control sample (dotted orange), measured in the 3" SDSS fibre. Right: The redshift distribution of the quasar host galaxies (solid blue) and the control sample (dot…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: K-component fraction vs. AF-component fraction for quasar host galaxies with 𝑓𝑔𝑎𝑙 ≥ 0.2 (blue dots), and stellar-mass matched control galaxies (orange dots). The light-grey dots represent the distribution of the MFICA parent galaxy sample (for visual-aid only). The gr…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison between the stack (mean) of all quasar host galaxy reconstructions (blue) and the stack of all control galaxy reconstructions (orange). Both stacks are normalised to mean flux of unity. Note that due to the way our MFICA components are constructed, the narr…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Percentage of different types of galaxies in the decomposed quasar host galaxy sample (dot-filled bars) and the control sample (line-filled bars). The height of each bar is the per cent of all quasar host galaxies or control galaxies with a given galaxy type. The erro…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

186 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..182..543A 182, 543

    Abazajian K. N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..182..543A 182, 543

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [3]

    Aird J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...746...90A 746, 90

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/1/90 2012

  3. [4]

    L., Georgakakis A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4360A 484, 4360

    Aird J., Coil A. L., Georgakakis A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4360A 484, 4360

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz125 2019

  4. [5]

    M., Hickox R

    Alexander D. M., Hickox R. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2011.11.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012NewAR..56...93A 56, 93

    doi:10.1016/j.newar.2011.11.003 2012

  5. [6]

    T., Hewett P

    Allen J. T., Hewett P. C., Richardson C. T., Ferland G. J., Baldwin J. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.3510A 430, 3510

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt151 2013

  6. [7]

    Almaini O., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.tmp..630A

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf659 2025

  7. [8]

    K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \'c Z ., Lupton R

    Baldry I. K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \'c Z ., Lupton R. H., Nichol R. C., Szalay A. S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380092 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...600..681B 600, 681

    doi:10.1086/380092 2004

  8. [9]

    A., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155294 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...214..679B 214, 679

    Baldwin J. A., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155294 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...214..679B 214, 679

    doi:10.1086/155294 1977

Show all 186 references
  1. [10]

    L., Morris S

    Balogh M. L., Morris S. L., Yee H. K. C., Carlberg R. G., Ellingson E., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...527...54B 527, 54

    1999 doi

  2. [11]

    E., Weigel A

    B \"a r R. E., Weigel A. K., Sartori L. F., Oh K., Koss M., Schawinski K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.2879B 466, 2879

    2017 doi

  3. [12]

    H., Hearin A

    Behroozi P., Wechsler R. H., Hearin A. P., Conroy C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3143B 488, 3143

    2019 doi

  4. [13]

    J., Bower R

    Benson A. J., Bower R. G., Frenk C. S., Lacey C. G., Baugh C. M., Cole S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...599...38B 599, 38

    2003 doi

  5. [14]

    S., Tadhunter C

    Bessiere P. S., Tadhunter C. N., Ramos Almeida C., Villar Mart \' n M., Cabrera-Lavers A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.3887B 466, 3887

    2017 doi

  6. [15]

    K., Karhunen K., Uslenghi M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2233 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.4103B 454, 4103

    Bettoni D., Falomo R., Kotilainen J. K., Karhunen K., Uslenghi M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2233 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.4103B 454, 4103

    2015 doi

  7. [16]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504..372B 504, 372

    Bickley R. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504..372B 504, 372

    2021 doi

  8. [17]

    L., Watson M

    Birchall K. L., Watson M. G., Aird J., Starling R. L. C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.4756B 523, 4756

    2023 doi

  9. [18]

    Bournaud F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...81B 757, 81

    2012 doi

  10. [20]

    S., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...520L..87B 520, L87

    Brotherton M. S., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...520L..87B 520, L87

    1999 doi

  11. [21]

    Brown M. J. I., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703..150B 703, 150

    2009 doi

  12. [23]

    Buchner J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449372 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.161B 692, A161

    2024 doi

  13. [24]

    Burtscher L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140593 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A.132B 654, A132

    2021 doi

  14. [25]

    L., Brotherton M

    Cales S. L., Brotherton M. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv370 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.2374C 449, 2374

    2015 doi

  15. [26]

    L., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741..106C 741, 106

    Cales S. L., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741..106C 741, 106

    2011 doi

  16. [27]

    L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...90C 762, 90

    Cales S. L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...90C 762, 90

    2013 doi

  17. [28]

    Canalizo G., Stockton A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...555..719C 555, 719

    2001 doi

  18. [29]

    Canalizo G., Stockton A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..132C 772, 132

    2013 doi

  19. [30]

    J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/50 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...802...50C 802, 50

    Chen C.-T. J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/50 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...802...50C 802, 50

    2015 doi

  20. [31]

    S., Ostriker J

    Choi E., Somerville R. S., Ostriker J. P., Hirschmann M., Naab T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad245a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...54C 964, 54

    2024 doi

  21. [33]

    P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1038C 665, 1038

    Ciotti L., Ostriker J. P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1038C 665, 1038

    2007 doi

  22. [34]

    Cisternas M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...726...57C 726, 57

    2011 doi

  23. [35]

    J., Szalay A

    Connolly A. J., Szalay A. S., Bershady M. A., Kinney A. L., Calzetti D., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995AJ....110.1071C 110, 1071

    1995 doi

  24. [36]

    Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..393C 51, 393

    2013 doi

  25. [38]

    I., M \"u ller S \'a nchez F., Genzel R., Tacconi L

    Davies R. I., M \"u ller S \'a nchez F., Genzel R., Tacconi L. J., Hicks E. K. S., Friedrich S., Sternberg A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.1388D 671, 1388

    2007 doi

  26. [39]

    J., Pontzen A., Crain R

    Davies J. J., Pontzen A., Crain R. A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1742 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.1430D 515, 1430

    2022 doi

  27. [40]

    De Propris R., Melnick J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.2837D 439, 2837

    2014 doi

  28. [41]

    Di Matteo T., Springel V., Hernquist L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.433..604D 433, 604

    2005 doi

  29. [42]

    L., Harrison C

    Dougherty S. L., Harrison C. M., Kocevski D. D., Rosario D. J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.3146D 527, 3146

    2024 doi

  30. [43]

    R., Ballantyne D

    Draper A. R., Ballantyne D. R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751...72D 751, 72

    2012 doi

  31. [44]

    L., Teimoorinia H., Rosario D

    Ellison S. L., Teimoorinia H., Rosario D. J., Mendel J. T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458L..34E 458, L34

    2016 doi

  32. [45]

    L., Viswanathan A., Patton D

    Ellison S. L., Viswanathan A., Patton D. R., Bottrell C., McConnachie A. W., Gwyn S., Cuillandre J.-C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1431 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.2491E 487, 2491

    2019 doi

  33. [46]

    R., 2024, @doi [The Open Journal of Astrophysics] 10.33232/001c.127779 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024OJAp....7E.121E 7, 121

    Ellison S., Ferreira L., Wild V., Wilkinson S., Rowlands K., Patton D. R., 2024, @doi [The Open Journal of Astrophysics] 10.33232/001c.127779 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024OJAp....7E.121E 7, 121

    2024 doi

  34. [47]

    L., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.03066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250303066E p

    Ellison S. L., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.03066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250303066E p. arXiv:2503.03066

    2025 doi arXiv

  35. [48]

    C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..455F 50, 455

    Fabian A. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..455F 50, 455

    2012 doi

  36. [49]

    Ferrarese L., Merritt D., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312838 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...539L...9F 539, L9

    2000 doi

  37. [50]

    J., Hewett P

    Francis P. J., Hewett P. C., Foltz C. B., Chaffee F. H., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...398..476F 398, 476

    1992 doi

  38. [51]

    D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac0a59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASP..133g2001F 133, 072001

    French K. D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac0a59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASP..133g2001F 133, 072001

    2021 doi

  39. [52]

    D., Yang Y., Zabludoff A., Narayanan D., Shirley Y., Walter F., Smith J.-D., Tremonti C

    French K. D., Yang Y., Zabludoff A., Narayanan D., Shirley Y., Walter F., Smith J.-D., Tremonti C. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801....1F 801, 1

    2015 doi

  40. [54]

    Gebhardt K., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...539L..13G 539, L13

    2000 doi

  41. [56]

    Georgantopoulos I., Pouliasis E., Mountrichas G., Van der Wel A., Marchesi S., Lanzuisi G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244875 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A..67G 673, A67

    2023 doi

  42. [57]

    M., Lacy M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..218G 806, 218

    Glikman E., Simmons B., Mailly M., Schawinski K., Urry C. M., Lacy M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..218G 806, 218

    2015 doi

  43. [58]

    Goto T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10413.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369.1765G 369, 1765

    2006

  44. [59]

    H \"a ring N., Rix H.-W., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383567 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...604L..89H 604, L89

    2004 doi

  45. [60]

    M., Ramos Almeida C., 2024, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies12020017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Galax..12...17H 12, 17

    Harrison C. M., Ramos Almeida C., 2024, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies12020017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Galax..12...17H 12, 17

    2024 doi

  46. [61]

    C., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...448...41H 448, 41

    Hernquist L., Mihos J. C., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...448...41H 448, 41

    1995 doi

  47. [63]

    Hewlett T., Villforth C., Wild V., Mendez-Abreu J., Pawlik M., Rowlands K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx997 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470..755H 470, 755

    2017 doi

  48. [64]

    C., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/891 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..891H 696, 891

    Hickox R. C., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/891 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..891H 696, 891

    2009 doi

  49. [65]

    S., Naab T., Burkert A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21626.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426..237H 426, 237

    Hirschmann M., Somerville R. S., Naab T., Burkert A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21626.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426..237H 426, 237

    2012

  50. [67]

    F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01179.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420L...8H 420, L8

    Hopkins P. F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01179.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420L...8H 420, L8

    2012

  51. [68]

    F., Hernquist L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...694..599H 694, 599

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...694..599H 694, 599

    2009 doi

  52. [69]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Kere s D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..175..356H 175, 356

    2008 doi

  53. [70]

    Hyvärinen A., karhunen J., Oja E., 2001, What is Independent Component Analysis?. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, pp 145--164 ( @eprint https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/0471221317.ch7 ), @doi https://doi.org/10.1002/0471221317.ch7 , https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...

    2001 doi

  54. [71]

    Højen-Sørensen P., Winther O., Hansen L., 2002, Neural Computation, 14, 889

    2002

  55. [72]

    Ilbert O., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A..55I 556, A55

    2013 doi

  56. [73]

    Ilbert O., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A...2I 579, A2

    2015 doi

  57. [74]

    V., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734...92J 734, 92

    Jahnke K., Macci \`o A. V., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734...92J 734, 92

    2011 doi

  58. [75]

    Jahnke K., Kuhlbrodt B., Wisotzki L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07933.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352..399J 352, 399

    2004

  59. [77]

    S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521L..11J 521, L11

    Jalan P., Rakshit S., Woo J.-J., Kotilainen J., Stalin C. S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521L..11J 521, L11

    2023 doi

  60. [78]

    Ji Z., Giavalisco M., Kirkpatrick A., Kocevski D., Daddi E., Delvecchio I., Hatcher C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3837 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...925...74J 925, 74

    2022 doi

  61. [79]

    693, Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales

    Jogee S., 2006, in Alloin D., ed., , Vol. 693, Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales. p. 143, @doi 10.1007/3-540-34621-X_6

    2006 doi

  62. [80]

    A., Raychaudhury S., 2005, in Proceedings of the Fifth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining Editors: Hillol Kargupta

    Kaban A., Nolan L. A., Raychaudhury S., 2005, in Proceedings of the Fifth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining Editors: Hillol Kargupta. p. 183 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0505059 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0505059

    2005 doi arXiv

  63. [81]

    M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14960.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.397..135K 397, 135

    Kauffmann G., Heckman T. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14960.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.397..135K 397, 135

    2009

  64. [82]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003a, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...33K 341, 33

    2003

  65. [83]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346.1055K 346, 1055

    2003

  66. [84]

    C., Shen Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764...45K 764, 45

    Kelly B. C., Shen Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764...45K 764, 45

    2013 doi

  67. [85]

    C., Im M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/501422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..702K 642, 702

    Kim M., Ho L. C., Im M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/501422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..702K 642, 702

    2006 doi

  68. [86]

    D., Lubin L

    Kocevski D. D., Lubin L. M., Lemaux B. C., Gal R. R., Fassnacht C. D., Lin R., Squires G. K., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700..901K 700, 901

    2009 doi

  69. [87]

    D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814..104K 814, 104

    Kocevski D. D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814..104K 814, 104

    2015 doi

  70. [88]

    C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..511K 51, 511

    Kormendy J., Ho L. C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..511K 51, 511

    2013 doi

  71. [89]

    Lacerda E. A. D., S \'a nchez S. F., Cid Fernandes R., L \'o pez-Cob \'a C., Espinosa-Ponce C., Galbany L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa008 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3073L 492, 3073

    2020 doi

  72. [90]

    Lanz L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d56 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935...29L 935, 29

    2022 doi

  73. [91]

    K., Kewley L

    Leslie S. K., Kewley L. J., Sanders D. B., Lee N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455L..82L 455, L82

    2016 doi

  74. [92]

    Li J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac06a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...918...22L 918, 22

    2021 doi

  75. [93]

    Li W., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1473 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523..720L 523, 720

    2023 doi

  76. [94]

    Lotz M., Dolag K., Remus R.-S., Burkert A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.4516L 506, 4516

    2021 doi

  77. [95]

    Lu H., Zhou H., Wang J., Wang T., Dong X., Zhuang Z., Li C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498711 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131..790L 131, 790

    2006 doi

  78. [96]

    Magorrian J., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.2285M 115, 2285

    1998 doi

  79. [97]

    Marian V., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd3e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904...79M 904, 79

    2020 doi

  80. [98]

    J., Dekel A., Teyssier R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...756...26M 756, 26

    Martig M., Bournaud F., Croton D. J., Dekel A., Teyssier R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...756...26M 756, 26

    2012 doi

  81. [99]

    C., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..342M 173, 342

    Martin D. C., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..342M 173, 342

    2007 doi

  82. [100]

    A., Price III T

    Matsuoka Y., Strauss M. A., Price III T. N., DiDonato M. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780..162M 780, 162

    2014 doi

  83. [101]

    Matsuoka Y., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/91 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811...91M 811, 91

    2015 doi

  84. [102]

    J., McLure R

    McLeod D. J., McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., Cullen F., Carnall A. C., Duncan K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab731 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.4413M 503, 4413

    2021 doi

  85. [104]

    Mechtley M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830..156M 830, 156

    2016 doi

  86. [105]

    Melnick J., Telles E., De Propris R., Chu Z.-H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582A..37M 582, A37

    2015 doi

  87. [106]

    Meusinger H., Br \"u necke J., Schalldach P., in der Au A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629139 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597A.134M 597, A134

    2017 doi

  88. [107]

    Mountrichas G., Buat V., Yang G., Boquien M., Burgarella D., Ciesla L., Malek K., Shirley R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...663A.130M 663, A130

    2022 doi

  89. [108]

    R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19675.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419...95M 419, 95

    Mullaney J. R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19675.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419...95M 419, 95

    2012

  90. [109]

    R., Alexander D

    Mullaney J. R., Alexander D. M., Fine S., Goulding A. D., Harrison C. M., Hickox R. C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433..622M 433, 622

    2013 doi

  91. [110]

    Muzzin A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777...18M 777, 18

    2013 doi

  92. [111]

    B., Ingargiola A., 2015, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.11813 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11813

    Newville M., Stensitzki T., Allen D. B., Ingargiola A., 2015, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.11813 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11813

    2015 doi

  93. [112]

    L., Buchner J., Salvato M., Yang G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.4778N 524, 4778

    Ni Q., Aird J., Merloni A., Birchall K. L., Buchner J., Salvato M., Yang G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.4778N 524, 4778

    2023 doi

  94. [113]

    G., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517926 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660L..43N 660, L43

    Noeske K. G., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517926 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660L..43N 660, L43

    2007 doi

  95. [114]

    A., Dunlop J

    Nolan L. A., Dunlop J. S., Kukula M. J., Hughes D. H., Boroson T., Jimenez R., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04174.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.323..308N 323, 308

    2001

  96. [115]

    S., Ostriker J

    Novak G. S., Ostriker J. P., Ciotti L., 2011, @doi [Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/26 , 737

    2011 doi

  97. [116]

    E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...422..158O 422, 158

    O'Donnell J. E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...422..158O 422, 158

    1994 doi

  98. [117]

    Opper M., Winther O., 2005, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6, 2177

    2005

  99. [118]

    M., Wild V., Walcher C

    Pawlik M. M., Wild V., Walcher C. J., Johansson P. H., Villforth C., Rowlands K., Mendez-Abreu J., Hewlett T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2878 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.3032P 456, 3032

    2016 doi

  100. [119]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1708P 477, 1708

    Pawlik M. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1708P 477, 1708

    2018 doi

  101. [120]

    Querejeta M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219....5Q 219, 5

    2015 doi

  102. [121]

    L., Hewett P

    Rankine A. L., Hewett P. C., Banerji M., Richards G. T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.4553R 492, 4553

    2020 doi

  103. [122]

    E., Volonteri M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...82R 813, 82

    Reines A. E., Volonteri M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...82R 813, 82

    2015 doi

  104. [123]

    D., Burke C

    Ren W., Guo H., Shen Y., Silverman J. D., Burke C. J., Wang S., Wang J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974..153R 974, 153

    2024 doi

  105. [124]

    T., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.2945R 123, 2945

    Richards G. T., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.2945R 123, 2945

    2002 doi

  106. [125]

    Richardson J., Zheng Z., Chatterjee S., Nagai D., Shen Y., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755...30R 755, 30

    2012 doi

  107. [126]

    Riffel R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.5640R 524, 5640

    2023 doi

  108. [127]

    Rodr \' guez Montero F., Dav \'e R., Wild V., Angl \'e s-Alc \'a zar D., Narayanan D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.2139R 490, 2139

    2019 doi

  109. [128]

    Ronen S., Aragon-Salamanca A., Lahav O., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02222.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.303..284R 303, 284

    1999

  110. [129]

    J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219258 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...545A..45R 545, A45

    Rosario D. J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219258 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...545A..45R 545, A45

    2012 doi

  111. [130]

    J., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A..72R 560, A72

    Rosario D. J., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A..72R 560, A72

    doi

  112. [131]

    J., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...771...63R 771, 63

    Rosario D. J., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...771...63R 771, 63

    doi

  113. [132]

    Rowlands K., Wild V., Nesvadba N., Sibthorpe B., Mortier A., Lehnert M., da Cunha E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448..258R 448, 258

    2015 doi

  114. [133]

    Rowlands K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1903 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.1168R 473, 1168

    2018 doi

  115. [134]

    Salim S., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/424800 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619L..39S 619, L39

    2005 doi

  116. [135]

    Salim S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..267S 173, 267

    2007 doi

  117. [136]

    B., Soifer B

    Sanders D. B., Soifer B. T., Elias J. H., Neugebauer G., Matthews K., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/185155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...328L..35S 328, L35

    1988 doi

  118. [137]

    Sazonova E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0f7f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...919..134S 919, 134

    2021 doi

  119. [139]

    M., Treister E., Kaviraj S., Kushkuley B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/L19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...692L..19S 692, L19

    Schawinski K., Virani S., Simmons B., Urry C. M., Treister E., Kaviraj S., Kushkuley B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/L19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...692L..19S 692, L19

    2009 doi

  120. [140]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  121. [141]

    P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2360S 139, 2360

    Schneider D. P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2360S 139, 2360

    2010 doi

  122. [142]

    Schulze A., Wisotzki L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...535A..87S 535, A87

    2011 doi

  123. [143]

    H., Miralda-Escud \'e J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690...20S 690, 20

    Shankar F., Weinberg D. H., Miralda-Escud \'e J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690...20S 690, 20

    2009 doi

  124. [144]

    E., Schneider D

    Shen J., Vanden Berk D. E., Schneider D. P., Hall P. B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135..928S 135, 928

    2008 doi

  125. [145]

    Shen Y., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...45S 194, 45

    2011 doi

  126. [146]

    Shen Y., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/98 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...98S 778, 98

    2013 doi

  127. [147]

    Shen Y., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/96 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...96S 805, 96

    2015 doi

  128. [148]

    H., Ogle P., Jiang L., Diamond-Stanic A

    Shi Y., Rieke G. H., Ogle P., Jiang L., Diamond-Stanic A. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703.1107S 703, 1107

    2009 doi

  129. [149]

    T., Mushotzky R

    Shimizu T. T., Mushotzky R. F., Mel \'e ndez M., Koss M., Rosario D. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1407 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.1841S 452, 1841

    2015 doi

  130. [150]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...331L...1S 331, L1

    Silk J., Rees M. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...331L...1S 331, L1

    1998 doi arXiv

  131. [151]

    D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675.1025S 675, 1025

    Silverman J. D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675.1025S 675, 1025

    2008 doi

  132. [152]

    D., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/396 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..396S 696, 396

    Silverman J. D., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/396 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..396S 696, 396

    2009 doi

  133. [153]

    F., Cox T

    Snyder G. F., Cox T. J., Hayward C. C., Hernquist L., Jonsson P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/77 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...77S 741, 77

    2011 doi

  134. [154]

    Springel V., Di Matteo T., Hernquist L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...620L..79S 620, L79

    2005 doi

  135. [155]

    M., Alexander D

    Stanley F., Harrison C. M., Alexander D. M., Swinbank A. M., Aird J. A., Del Moro A., Hickox R. C., Mullaney J. R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1678 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453..591S 453, 591

    2015 doi

  136. [156]

    Stanley F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.2221S 472, 2221

    2017 doi

  137. [157]

    K., Hirschmann M., Dolag K., Shankar F., Juneau S., Krumpe M., Remus R.-S., Teklu A

    Steinborn L. K., Hirschmann M., Dolag K., Shankar F., Juneau S., Krumpe M., Remus R.-S., Teklu A. F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2288 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481..341S 481, 341

    2018 doi

  138. [158]

    V., 2004, Independent Component Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction

    Stone J. V., 2004, Independent Component Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

    2004

  139. [159]

    Storchi-Bergmann T., Schnorr-M \"u ller A., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0611-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3...48S 3, 48

    2019 doi

  140. [160]

    Strateva I., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.1861S 122, 1861

    2001 doi

  141. [161]

    A., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.1810S 124, 1810

    Strauss M. A., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.1810S 124, 1810

    2002 doi

  142. [162]

    Suh H., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab01fb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..168S 872, 168

    2019 doi

  143. [163]

    Tang S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.5272T 521, 5272

    2023 doi

  144. [164]

    G., Rowlands K., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad1098 , 522, 2297

    Taylor E., Almaini O., Merrifield M., Maltby D., Wild V., Hartley W. G., Rowlands K., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad1098 , 522, 2297

    2023 doi

  145. [165]

    J., Hewett P

    Temple M. J., Hewett P. C., Banerji M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2586 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508..737T 508, 737

    2021 doi

  146. [166]

    A., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..898T 613, 898

    Tremonti C. A., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..898T 613, 898

    2004 doi

  147. [167]

    R., Hsu A

    Trump J. R., Hsu A. D., Fang J. J., Faber S. M., Koo D. C., Kocevski D. D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763..133T 763, 133

    2013 doi

  148. [168]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811...26T 811, 26

    Trump J. R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811...26T 811, 26

    2015 doi

  149. [169]

    H., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...674...80U 674, 80

    Urrutia T., Lacy M., Becker R. H., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...674...80U 674, 80

    2008 doi

  150. [170]

    E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131...84V 131, 84

    Vanden Berk D. E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131...84V 131, 84

    2006 doi

  151. [171]

    Villforth C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..812V 466, 812

    2017 doi

  152. [172]

    P., Tinetti G., Deroo P., Hollis M

    Waldmann I. P., Tinetti G., Deroo P., Hollis M. D. J., Yurchenko S. N., Tennyson J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766....7W 766, 7

    2013 doi

  153. [173]

    Wang L., Kauffmann G., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13907.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391..785W 391, 785

    2008

  154. [174]

    R., Harrison C

    Ward S. R., Harrison C. M., Costa T., Mainieri V., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1219 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.2936W 514, 2936

    2022 doi

  155. [175]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W 677, A184

    Weaver J. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W 677, A184

    2023 doi

  156. [176]

    S., Shi Y., Chen Y., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...27W 857, 27

    Wei P., Gu Y., Brotherton M. S., Shi Y., Chen Y., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...27W 857, 27

    2018 doi

  157. [177]

    C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08844.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358.1083W 358, 1083

    Wild V., Hewett P. C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08844.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358.1083W 358, 1083

    2005

  158. [178]

    Wild V., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., Charlot S., Lemson G., Brinchmann J., Reichard T., Pasquali A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12256.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381..543W 381, 543

    2007

  159. [179]

    Wild V., Heckman T., Charlot S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16536.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405..933W 405, 933

    2010

  160. [180]

    Wild V., Almaini O., Dunlop J., Simpson C., Rowlands K., Bowler R., Maltby D., McLure R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1996 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463..832W 463, 832

    2016 doi

  161. [181]

    Wild V., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..529W 494, 529

    2020 doi

  162. [182]

    L., Bottrell C., Bickley R

    Wilkinson S., Ellison S. L., Bottrell C., Bickley R. W., Gwyn S., Cuillandre J.-C., Wild V., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1962 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.4354W 516, 4354

    2022 doi

  163. [183]

    L., Bottrell C., Bickley R

    Wilkinson S., Ellison S. L., Bottrell C., Bickley R. W., Byrne-Mamahit S., Ferreira L., Patton D. R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae287 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.5558W 528, 5558

    2024 doi

  164. [184]

    L., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJS..111..377W 111, 377

    Worthey G., Ottaviani D. L., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJS..111..377W 111, 377

    1997 doi

  165. [185]

    C., Zhuang M.-Y., Shangguan J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe404 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..124X 910, 124

    Xie Y., Ho L. C., Zhuang M.-Y., Shangguan J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe404 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..124X 910, 124

    2021 doi

  166. [186]

    A., Faber S

    Yan R., Newman J. A., Faber S. M., Konidaris N., Koo D., Davis M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..281Y 648, 281

    2006 doi

  167. [187]

    M., Faber S

    Yesuf H. M., Faber S. M., Trump J. R., Koo D. C., Fang J. J., Liu F. S., Wild V., Hayward C. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...84Y 792, 84

    2014 doi

  168. [188]

    W., et al., 2004a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128..585Y 128, 585

    Yip C. W., et al., 2004a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128..585Y 128, 585

    doi

  169. [189]

    W., et al., 2004b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.2603Y 128, 2603

    Yip C. W., et al., 2004b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.2603Y 128, 2603

    doi

  170. [190]

    G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    York D. G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    2000 doi

  171. [191]

    Yue M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacf04 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863...21Y 863, 21

    2018 doi

  172. [192]

    L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2571 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.4191Z 455, 4191

    Zakamska N. L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2571 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.4191Z 455, 4191

    2016 doi

  173. [193]

    A., Shangguan J., Zhuang M.-Y., Ho L

    Zhao Y., Li Y. A., Shangguan J., Zhuang M.-Y., Ho L. C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac375b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...925...70Z 925, 70

    2022 doi

  174. [194]

    H., Law D., Weaver J

    Zheng Y., Wild V., Lah \'e n N., Johansson P. H., Law D., Weaver J. R., Jimenez N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.1259Z 498, 1259

    2020 doi

  175. [195]

    C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7aaf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934..130Z 934, 130

    Zhuang M.-Y., Ho L. C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7aaf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934..130Z 934, 130

    2022 doi

  176. [196]

    C., Middelberg E., Norris R

    Zinn P. C., Middelberg E., Norris R. P., Dettmar R. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774...66Z 774, 66

    2013 doi

  177. [197]

    N., Xue Y., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878...11Z 878, 11

    Zou F., Yang G., Brandt W. N., Xue Y., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878...11Z 878, 11

    2019 doi

  178. [198]

    A., Kuntschner H., Pracy M

    Zwaan M. A., Kuntschner H., Pracy M. B., Couch W. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432..492Z 432, 492

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.