Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Ages and metallicities of quiescent galaxies: confronting broadband ($UVJ$) colours with stellar absorption lines

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Absorption-line measurements show stellar metallicity increases across the UVJ diagram, perpendicular to the age trend, while standard stellar population models predict the opposite direction.

desk verdict The new result here is that stellar metallicity in quiescent galaxies increases perpendicular to the UVJ quiescent sequence while age increases along it, measured directly from absorption-line spectra; the paper is solid but the edge-of-box metallicity calibration needs independent verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08858 v2 pith:QF4CGK5T submitted 2025-05-13 astro-ph.GA

Chloe M. Cheng , Mariska Kriek , Aliza G. Beverage , Martje Slob , Rachel Bezanson , Marijn Franx , Joel Leja , Pavel E. Mancera Piña
show 4 more authors
Katherine A. Suess Arjen van der Wel Jesse van de Sande Pieter G. van Dokkum
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords quiescentgalaxiesstellarmetallicityUVJdiagramabsorption-linespectroscopypopulationsynthesisage-metallicitydegeneracymass-to-lightratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper confronts two independent ways of measuring the stellar content of quiescent galaxies: broad-band rest-frame $U-V$ and $V-J$ colours, which trace the shape of the stellar continuum, and ages and iron abundances extracted from continuum-normalized absorption-line spectra, which do not depend on that shape. Using about 700 massive quiescent galaxies at $0.6\lesssim z\lesssim1.0$, it finds that age increases along the quiescent sequence in the $UVJ$ diagram, while [Fe/H] increases approximately perpendicular to that sequence, with higher metallicities at redder $U-V$ and bluer $V-J$. Standard stellar population synthesis models (fsps and BC03) predict the opposite direction for metallicity. If the result holds, photometric fits that use continuum shapes alone can systematically misassign metallicity to age, dust, or star-formation history, biasing derived stellar masses and the interpretation of quiescent galaxy evolution.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the combination of full-spectrum absorption-line fitting with the code alf, which continuum-normalizes each spectrum before fitting so that age and [Fe/H] are independent of the overall SED shape, together with LOESS smoothing of the $UVJ$ diagram to reveal the directional gradients in age and metallicity. The comparison uses stellar evolution tracks generated with fsps and BC03 models, fed with the sample's measured ages and metallicities to predict $UVJ$ colours, and dynamical mass-to-light ratios from virial masses as an independent check. The load-bearing step is the perpendicularity: the model tracks predict [Fe/H] increasing along the quiescent sequence, while the data show it increasing across it.

What would settle it

A direct check is to obtain higher signal-to-noise absorption-line spectra (or Lick-index measurements interpreted through a different set of models) for the galaxies near the blue edge of the UVJ box. If those galaxies' [Fe/H] values come out near solar rather than subsolar, the perpendicular metallicity gradient disappears; if they remain subsolar, the trend is robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for massive quiescent galaxies at intermediate redshift, ages derived from continuum-normalized absorption-line spectra increase approximately along the quiescent sequence in the rest-frame $UVJ$ diagram, from roughly 1 Gyr in the bluest regions to 3–5 Gyr in the reddest regions. In contrast, iron abundances [Fe/H] increase roughly perpendicular to that sequence, from subsolar values near the blue edge of the $UVJ$ box to supersolar values at redder $U-V$ and bluer $V-J$. This is presented as the first detection of a metallicity trend from absorption lines that is independent of continuum shape. Two popular stellar population synthesis models, fsps and BC03, reproduce the age trend but predict that metallicity increases approximately along the quiescent sequence, nearly perpendicular to what is observed. Dynamical mass-to-light ratio trends derived from virial masses also diverge from model predictions at the reddest tip of the sequence. The paper concludes that relying on model fits to continuum shapes alone may lead to systematic biases in ages, metallicities, and stellar masses of quiescent galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the [Fe/H] values measured by alf from continuum-normalized absorption lines are unbiased across the whole UVJ quiescent box, especially near the blue edge where the lowest-metallicity galaxies anchor the perpendicular trend; if alf systematically underestimates [Fe/H] for galaxies with residual star formation, a young population, or dust near that edge, the observed trend would be partly or wholly artificial.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reddening along the quiescent sequence in the $UVJ$ diagram is primarily an age effect, as previously suggested, but now confirmed with ages that do not depend on the continuum shape.
  • The $UVJ$ diagram can be used to rank quiescent galaxies as relatively more or less metal-rich, although the scatter is large and precise metallicities cannot be read off the colours.
  • Standard solar-scaled stellar population synthesis models systematically mispredict the colours associated with metallicity, so photometric SED fitting alone may bias derived metallicities, ages, dust, and star-formation histories.
  • Dynamical mass-to-light ratio trends disagree with model predictions, implying that stellar masses inferred from SPS-based $M/L$ ratios may be systematically offset for the reddest, most massive quiescent galaxies.
  • Resolving the data-model discrepancy matters for higher-redshift quiescent galaxies observed with JWST, where spectroscopy is sparse and photometric continuum fitting remains the primary tool.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the perpendicular metallicity gradient is real, the $UVJ$ diagram carries a second, approximately orthogonal axis of information: one axis (along the sequence) encodes age and the other (across it) encodes metallicity, suggesting that joint colour and line measurements could separate age and metallicity in photometric samples without full spectroscopy.
  • A direct test of the explanation would be to generate $UVJ$ model tracks with non-solar or $\alpha$-enhanced abundance patterns; if those tracks rotate the metallicity direction to match the data, the discrepancy is explained by the models' solar-scaled assumption rather than by new physics in the galaxies.
  • Because the models mispredict $M/L$ trends along the reddest tip, published stellar masses of the most massive red quiescent galaxies may carry systematic offsets that propagate into inferred formation redshifts and quenching timescales.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper measures SSP-equivalent ages and [Fe/H] abundances for 683 massive quiescent galaxies at 0.6 ≲ z ≲ 1.0 from LEGA-C, fitting continuum-normalized absorption-line spectra with alf, and compares these measurements to rest-frame U−V and V−J colours. The main findings are that age increases approximately along the quiescent sequence in the UVJ diagram, while [Fe/H] increases approximately perpendicular to that sequence. Forward predictions from fsps and BC03, computed by injecting the measured ages and metallicities into the models, reproduce the age trend but predict metallicity to increase roughly along the quiescent sequence rather than perpendicular to it. The paper further compares dynamical mass-to-light ratios with model M/L trends and argues that photometric SED fitting may therefore yield systematically biased ages, metallicities, and stellar masses. Robustness tests address dust, star-formation history, UVJ box shifts, and composite young populations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper is an important empirical result: it uses a large sample, extracts ages and metallicities independently of continuum shape, and makes a non-circular forward-model comparison rather than fitting the models to the observed colours. The study connects to the long-standing problem of age–metallicity–dust degeneracies and has direct implications for photometric SED fitting, stellar mass estimates, and SPS model development. The manuscript also contains a useful set of sanity tests: the UVJ box shift, the dust and SFH variants, and the composite-spectrum experiment in Section 4.4. The forward-model comparison in Figs 3, 4, and 7 is not circular because the measured ages and metallicities are inputs, not fitting outputs, and the model tracks are evaluated over the observed parameter range.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.4, composite-spectrum test] The composite-spectrum test shows that adding a 6 per cent young component shifts U−V by about 0.24 mag and lowers [Fe/H] by about 0.05 dex, whereas the observed decrease in [Fe/H] over a similar colour span is about 0.11 dex. Thus low-level recent star formation can account for roughly half of the observed metallicity gradient, and the paper's own test does not establish that the remaining half is robust to other edge-of-box systematics. Since the blue edge of the UVJ box anchors the low-metallicity end of the perpendicular trend, the central claim needs either a quantitative correction for this bias or an independent metallicity diagnostic (e.g., Lick indices or a different full-spectrum fitting code) applied to the edge-of-box galaxies. Without this, the claim that metallicity increases perpendicular to the quiescent sequence is only partially supported.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Figs 2, 4, 7] The perpendicular metallicity trend and the data–model differences in M/L are presented as qualitative visual trends, and the text explicitly states in Section 3.1 that the strength of the trends is not quantified. Given that the paper's headline result is a specific direction in UVJ space, the authors should provide a quantitative measure, such as a bootstrapped gradient vector in (U−V, V−J) space, a permutation test comparing the observed orientation with the model-predicted orientation, or a significance estimate for the residual trend after the young-population bias discussed in Section 4.4. This is a load-bearing addition rather than a cosmetic improvement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig 2 and LOESS smoothing] Please state the LOESS span, robust iteration settings, and any edge-weighting choices so that the smoothed maps in Figs 2, 4, and 7 are reproducible.
  2. [Table 1] The sSFR column is labelled with units of M_sun/yr, but the quantity is a specific star-formation rate averaged over 0.01 Gyr; the units should be yr^-1, and the definition should be clarified in the table caption.
  3. [Reference list] The reference entry for Beverage et al. (2021) appears to be malformed, with a missing journal name in the bibliography.
  4. [Section 3.2] The statement '[Fe/H] ≈ log(Z/Zsun)' is used to map alf measurements to fsps and BC03 metallicities, but the paper should explicitly note that alf fits [Fe/H] with variable abundance patterns while fsps and BC03 assume solar-scaled abundances, so the mapping is an approximation that may affect the quantitative comparison.
  5. [Section 4.4] The code name 'fast' (Kriek et al. 2009, 2018) should be set in a consistent style and defined at first use in the sentence describing the dust test.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured ages and metallicities are independent of continuum shape, and the model 'predictions' are forward computations rather than fits to the UVJ colours.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. Ages and [Fe/H] are measured with alf from continuum-normalized absorption-line spectra (Section 2.2), so they are not constructed from the broad-band U−V and V−J colours under study. The comparison in Figs 3, 4, and 7 is a forward modelling test: the measured SSP-equivalent ages and metallicities are input into fsps and BC03, and the resulting model UVJ colours and M/L ratios are compared with the independent photometric and dynamical measurements. No model parameter is fitted to the observed UVJ colours to produce the predicted trends, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional reduction. The only self-citation of note is the assumption [Fe/H] ≈ log(Z/Zsun) referenced to Beverage et al. (2025), but this is a unit-conversion assumption in the model comparison, not a load-bearing step that presumes the perpendicular metallicity trend; the observed trend itself comes directly from the absorption-line fits. The paper's own caveat section explicitly tests the robustness of the trend to edge-of-box contaminants and low-level star formation, and those tests are consistency checks rather than circular arguments. The independent measurements and externally available public codes mean the result is not forced by definition or by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison rests on the reliability of alf-based ages and [Fe/H] from continuum-normalized spectra, the accuracy of EaZY-derived UVJ colors, and the fidelity of the specific fsps and BC03 implementations (with truncated tau SFH and Av=0) as reference loci. The model comparison also assumes [Fe/H] maps to log(Z/Zsun). These are domain assumptions rather than fitted parameters; the paper tests variations of dust and SFH but cannot test all combinations.

free parameters (2)
  • Fig. 1 linear relation slopes and intercepts = [Fe/H] = 0.12 log(M*/Msun) - 1.46; [Fe/H] = -0.17 Age(Gyr) - 0.01
    Descriptive fits to the sample relations in Figure 1; not used to derive the UVJ trends.
  • Young SED luminosity fraction = 6 per cent of V-band luminosity
    Hand-chosen for the composite-spectrum contamination test in Section 4.4; does not enter the main result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption alf-derived SSP-equivalent ages and [Fe/H] abundances from continuum-normalized absorption-line spectra are unbiased for massive quiescent galaxies at 0.6<z<1.0.
    All measured trends in this paper use alf fits based on MIST isochrones, MILES/C3K libraries, and variable abundance patterns (Section 2.2). Systematic errors in alf would directly change the observed UVJ trends.
  • domain assumption Rest-frame U-V and V-J colors derived from EaZY template fitting to UltraVISTA photometry accurately represent the continuum shapes.
    The UVJ colors are the independent axis against which ages and metallicities are compared; template-fitting and zero-point systematics (noted in Section 2.1) would propagate into the comparison.
  • domain assumption The fsps and BC03 model tracks, computed with a truncated tau SFH after 1 Gyr and Av=0, provide the correct reference loci of UVJ colors as functions of age and [Fe/H].
    The claimed data-model discrepancy is measured against these specific model implementations; the authors test dust and other SFHs but the model loci themselves are taken as given.
  • domain assumption [Fe/H] from alf is equivalent to log(Z/Zsun) for the model tracks and galaxies.
    The paper assumes this conversion in Section 3.2; if the abundance pattern differs from solar-scaled, model colors at fixed [Fe/H] would shift.
  • domain assumption Dynamical virial masses scaled to Jeans-model masses (van der Wel et al. 2022) provide SPS-independent mass-to-light ratios for quiescent galaxies.
    Used for the M/L comparison in Section 4.2; the masses include dark matter within Re, which the paper notes could bias absolute M/L but not the qualitative trends.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ages and metallicities of quiescent galaxies: confronting broadband ($UVJ$) colours with stellar absorption lines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QF4CGK5T

@misc{pith2026250508858,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ages and metallicities of quiescent galaxies: confronting broadband ($UVJ$) colours with stellar absorption lines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QF4CGK5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08858}
}
abstract

For decades, studying quiescent galaxies beyond $z\sim1$ has been challenging due to the reliance on photometric spectral energy distributions, which are highly susceptible to degeneracies between age, metallicity, dust, and star-formation history. Only recently has deep, rest-frame, optical spectroscopy made robust metallicity and age measurements possible, allowing us to empirically assess their effects on continuum shapes. To this end, we measure ages and metallicities of $\sim700$ massive ($10.2\lesssim\log(M_*/M_\odot)\lesssim11.8$), quiescent galaxies at $0.6\lesssim z\lesssim1.0$ from the Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census (LEGA-C) via continuum-normalized, absorption-line spectra, and compare with independent rest-frame $U-V$ and $V-J$ colours. Age increases along the quiescent sequence as both colours redden, consistent with stellar population synthesis (SPS) model predictions. Metallicity increases perpendicularly to the age trend, with higher metallicities at redder $U-V$ and bluer $V-J$ colours. Thus, age and metallicity behave differently in the $UVJ$ diagram. Moreover, this trend conflicts with SPS model expectations of increasing metallicity approximately along the quiescent sequence. Independent dynamical mass-to-light ratio trends also differ dramatically from SPS model predictions. These results demonstrate that relying on model fits to continuum shapes alone may lead to systematic biases in ages, metallicities, and stellar masses. The cause of these data-model disparities may stem from non-solar abundance patterns in quiescent galaxies or the treatment of evolved stellar phases in the models. Resolving these discrepancies is crucial, as photometric data remain central even with JWST.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08858 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Properties of our final sample of massive quiescent galaxies from LEGA-C. In the top left panel, we show SSP-equivalent age as a function of stellar mass. In the top right panel, we show [Fe/H] as a function of stellar mass. In the bottom left panel, we show [Fe/H] as a function of age. In the bottom right panel, we show stellar mass as a function of redshift. We fit linear relations to the points in the top right a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rest-frame 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 diagrams of quiescent galaxies at 0.6 ≲ 𝑧 ≲ 1.0 from the LEGA-C survey. Left: In these panels, we colour code the symbols by their measured ages (top) and their measured [Fe/H] values (bottom), as derived by fitting absorption lines in continuum-normalized spectra with alf. Right: In these panels, we LOESS-smooth the ages and metallicities from the left panels (Cappellari et al. 2013b; Cleveland & De… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The same LOESS-smoothed rest-frame 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 diagrams as in the right panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: LOESS-smoothed rest-frame 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 diagrams for the observations and the models. For the models, we input the ages and metallicities of each galaxy in our LEGA-C sample and output the predicted rest-frame 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 colours, with some random scatter added to simulate observation…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A comparison of stacked LEGA-C spectra. In the top panel, we select three bins along the quiescent sequence and approximately along our observed age sequence. In the bottom panel, we select three bins perpendicular to the quiescent sequence and approximately along our …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: A comparison between the ages that we measure by using alf to fit absorption lines in continuum-normalized spectra (𝑦-axis) to those derived using equation (3) in B19 (i.e. using only the 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 colours, 𝑥-axis). The one-to-one relation is represented by the solid …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: LOESS-smoothed rest-frame 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 diagrams for the data and the models, where the diagrams are colour coded by the 𝑀/𝐿 ratio. The LEGA-C 𝑈𝑉 𝐽 diagrams are shown in the left column, the fsps diagrams are shown in the middle column, and the BC03 diagrams are shown in the ri…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeepDive: A deep dive into the physics of the first massive quiescent galaxies in the Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new sample of 150 spectroscopically confirmed quiescent galaxies at 1<z<5 shows that high-redshift examples have weaker 4000 Å breaks and reveals faint metal absorption even in the youngest subsample.

  2. Cold gas in a post-starburst pair at z ~ 1.4: major mergers as a pathway to quenching in the HeavyMetal survey

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ALMA detects about 10^9.7 solar masses of molecular gas in a merging post-starburst pair at z~1.4, while four similar galaxies are undetected, hinting that mergers may preserve gas while quenching star formation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

165 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Abdurro'uf Lin Y.-T., Wu P.-F., Akiyama M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...15A 254, 15

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2 2021

  3. [3]

    Akhshik M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...943..179A 943, 179

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca677 2023

  4. [4]

    B., Narayanan D., Whitaker K

    Akins H. B., Narayanan D., Whitaker K. E., Dav \'e R., Lower S., Bezanson R., Feldmann R., Kriek M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d3a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929...94A 929, 94

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d3a 2022

  5. [5]

    Alongi M., Bertelli G., Bressan A., Chiosi C., Fagotto F., Greggio L., Nasi E., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS...97..851A 97, 851

    1993

  6. [6]

    M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.3828B 512, 3828

    Barone T. M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.3828B 512, 3828

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac705 2022

  7. [7]

    F., de Jong R

    Bell E. F., de Jong R. S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03138.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.312..497B 312, 497

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    F., de Jong R

    Bell E. F., de Jong R. S., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...550..212B 550, 212

    doi:10.1086/319728 2001

Show all 165 references
  1. [9]

    F., McIntosh D

    Bell E. F., McIntosh D. H., Katz N., Weinberg M. D., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378847 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..149..289B 149, 289

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    B., Ellis R

    Belli S., Newman A. B., Ellis R. S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab07af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874...17B 874, 17

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Bellstedt S., Robotham A. S. G., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.17698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241017698B p. arXiv:2410.17698

    2024 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    K., Brownstein J

    Bernardi M., Dom \' nguez S \'a nchez H., Sheth R. K., Brownstein J. R., Lane R. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3287 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.4713B 518, 4713

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    arXiv:2501.07291

    Bevacqua D., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250107291B p. arXiv:2501.07291

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    2024 , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.13882666

    Beverage A., 2024, alizabeverage/alfalpha: Initial Release alongside Beverage et al. 2024 , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.13882666

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    G., Kriek M., Conroy C., Bezanson R., Franx M., van der Wel A., 2021, ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac12cd

    Beverage A. G., Kriek M., Conroy C., Bezanson R., Franx M., van der Wel A., 2021, ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac12cd

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    G., Kriek M., Conroy C., Sandford N

    Beverage A. G., Kriek M., Conroy C., Sandford N. R., Bezanson R., Franx M., van der Wel A., Weisz D. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948..140B 948, 140

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad372d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966..234B 966, 234

    Beverage A. G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad372d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966..234B 966, 234

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    G., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad96b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..249B 979, 249

    Beverage A. G., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad96b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..249B 979, 249

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    B., van Dokkum P

    Brammer G. B., van Dokkum P. G., Coppi P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591786 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...686.1503B 686, 1503

    2008 doi

  12. [20]

    Bressan A., Fagotto F., Bertelli G., Chiosi C., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS..100..647B 100, 647

    1993

  13. [23]

    M., Gaskell C

    Burstein D., Faber S. M., Gaskell C. M., Krumm N., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...287..586B 287, 586

    1984 doi

  14. [24]

    M., Stanway E

    Byrne C. M., Stanway E. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4995B 521, 4995

    2023 doi

  15. [25]

    M., Eldridge J

    Byrne C. M., Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf178 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537.2433B 537, 2433

    2025 doi

  16. [26]

    A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300295 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.1423C 115, 1423

    Caldwell N., Rose J. A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300295 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.1423C 115, 1423

    1998 doi

  17. [27]

    C., Kinney A

    Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R. C., Kinney A. L., Koornneef J., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C 533, 682

    2000 doi

  18. [28]

    Cappellari M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2597 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.3273C 526, 3273

    2023 doi

  19. [29]

    Cappellari M., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt562 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.1709C 432, 1709

    doi

  20. [30]

    Cappellari M., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt644 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.1862C 432, 1862

    doi

  21. [31]

    C., McLure R

    Carnall A. C., McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., Dav \'e R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4379C 480, 4379

    2018 doi

  22. [32]

    C., Leja J., Johnson B

    Carnall A. C., Leja J., Johnson B. D., McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., Conroy C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab04a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...873...44C 873, 44

    2019 doi

  23. [33]

    C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5b62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929..131C 929, 131

    Carnall A. C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5b62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929..131C 929, 131

    2022 doi

  24. [34]

    C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.619..716C 619, 716

    Carnall A. C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.619..716C 619, 716

    2023 doi

  25. [35]

    C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2092 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534..325C 534, 325

    Carnall A. C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2092 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534..325C 534, 325

    2024 doi

  26. [36]

    Chauke P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac324 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861...13C 861, 13

    2018 doi

  27. [37]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1739 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.3604C 532, 3604

    Cheng C. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1739 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.3604C 532, 3604

    2024 doi

  28. [38]

    J., Holden B

    Choi J., Conroy C., Moustakas J., Graves G. J., Holden B. P., Brodwin M., Brown M. J. I., van Dokkum P. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...95C 792, 95

    2014 doi

  29. [39]

    D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    2016 doi

  30. [40]

    D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaff67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..136C 872, 136

    Choi J., Conroy C., Johnson B. D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaff67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..136C 872, 136

    2019 doi

  31. [41]

    arXiv:2501.04788

    Clausen M., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.04788 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250104788C p. arXiv:2501.04788

    2025 doi arXiv

  32. [42]

    S., Devlin S

    Cleveland W. S., Devlin S. J., 1988, @doi [Journal of the American Statistical Association] 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478639 , 83, 596

    1988

  33. [44]

    Coelho P. R. T., Bruzual G., Charlot S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3023 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.2025C 491, 2025

    2020 doi

  34. [45]

    Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..393C 51, 393

    2013 doi

  35. [46]

    E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..833C 712, 833

    Conroy C., Gunn J. E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..833C 712, 833

    2010 doi

  36. [47]

    Conroy C., van Dokkum P., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747...69C 747, 69

    doi

  37. [48]

    G., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760...71C 760, 71

    Conroy C., van Dokkum P. G., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760...71C 760, 71

    doi

  38. [49]

    E., White M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699..486C 699, 486

    Conroy C., Gunn J. E., White M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699..486C 699, 486

    2009 doi

  39. [50]

    J., van Dokkum P

    Conroy C., Graves G. J., van Dokkum P. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780...33C 780, 33

    2014 doi

  40. [51]

    G., Lind K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab49 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854..139C 854, 139

    Conroy C., Villaume A., van Dokkum P. G., Lind K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab49 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854..139C 854, 139

    2018 doi

  41. [52]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832788 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.156D 631, A156

    D \' az-Garc \' a L. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832788 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.156D 631, A156

    2019 doi

  42. [53]

    Dotter A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..222....8D 222, 8

    2016 doi

  43. [54]

    Eminian C., Kauffmann G., Charlot S., Wild V., Bruzual G., Rettura A., Loveday J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12742.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384..930E 384, 930

    2008

  44. [55]

    Fagotto F., Bressan A., Bertelli G., Chiosi C., 1994a, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&AS..104..365F 104, 365

  45. [56]

    Fagotto F., Bressan A., Bertelli G., Chiosi C., 1994b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&AS..105...29F 105, 29

  46. [57]

    J., Gorgas J., Peletier R

    Falc \'o n-Barroso J., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez P., Vazdekis A., Ricciardelli E., Cardiel N., Cenarro A. J., Gorgas J., Peletier R. F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116842 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...532A..95F 532, A95

    2011 doi

  47. [58]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  48. [59]

    Fumagalli M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822....1F 822, 1

    2016 doi

  49. [60]

    F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/185/2/253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..185..253G 185, 253

    Gallazzi A., Bell E. F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/185/2/253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..185..253G 185, 253

    2009 doi

  50. [62]

    Girardi L., Bressan A., Chiosi C., Bertelli G., Nasi E., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..117..113G 117, 113

    1996

  51. [63]

    Glazebrook K., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature21680 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.544...71G 544, 71

    2017 doi

  52. [64]

    Glazebrook K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.628..277G 628, 277

    2024 doi

  53. [65]

    Gobat R., et al., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0352-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..239G 2, 239

    2018 doi

  54. [66]

    J., Faber S

    Gonzalez J. J., Faber S. M., Worthey G., 1993, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 42.06

    1993

  55. [67]

    J., Schiavon R

    Graves G. J., Schiavon R. P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/588097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..177..446G 177, 446

    2008 doi

  56. [68]

    Gu M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabbae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...37G 859, 37

    2018 doi

  57. [69]

    E., Newman A

    Gu M., Greene J. E., Newman A. B., Kreisch C., Quenneville M. E., Ma C.-P., Blakeslee J. P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69ea , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...932..103G 932, 103

    2022 doi

  58. [70]

    Haskell P., Das S., Smith D. J. B., Cochrane R. K., Hayward C. C., Angl \'e s-Alc \'a zar D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530L...7H 530, L7

    2024 doi

  59. [71]

    B., Mobasher B., Belli S., Ellis R

    Jafariyazani M., Newman A. B., Mobasher B., Belli S., Ellis R. S., Patel S. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aba11c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897L..42J 897, L42

    2020 doi

  60. [72]

    B., Mobasher B., Belli S., Ellis R

    Jafariyazani M., Newman A. B., Mobasher B., Belli S., Ellis R. S., Faisst A. L., 2024, Chemical Abundances of Early Quiescent Galaxies: New Observations and Modelling Impacts ( @eprint arXiv 2406.03549 )

    2024 arXiv

  61. [73]

    D., Leja J., Conroy C., Speagle J

    Johnson B. D., Leja J., Conroy C., Speagle J. S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...22J 254, 22

    2021 doi

  62. [74]

    Johnson B., et al., 2023, dfm/python-fsps: v0.4.6, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.10026684 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10026684

    2023 doi

  63. [75]

    T., Stanway E

    Jones G. T., Stanway E. R., Carnall A. C., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac1667 , 514, 5706

    2022 doi

  64. [76]

    Kaushal Y., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0c4e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961..118K 961, 118

    2024 doi

  65. [77]

    Kim T., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad95eb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...44K 169, 44

    2025 doi

  66. [78]

    T., Sansom A

    Knowles A. T., Sansom A. E., Allende Prieto C., Vazdekis A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2286K 504, 2286

    2021 doi

  67. [79]

    T., Sansom A

    Knowles A. T., Sansom A. E., Vazdekis A., Allende Prieto C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1647 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3450K 523, 3450

    2023 doi

  68. [80]

    Kriek M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/528945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...677..219K 677, 219

    2008 doi

  69. [81]

    G., Labb \'e I., Franx M., Illingworth G

    Kriek M., van Dokkum P. G., Labb \'e I., Franx M., Illingworth G. D., Marchesini D., Quadri R. F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700..221K 700, 221

    2009 doi

  70. [82]

    Kriek M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/722/1/L64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722L..64K 722, L64

    2010 doi

  71. [83]

    Kriek M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature20570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Natur.540..248K 540, 248

    2016 doi

  72. [84]

    Kriek M., et al., 2018, FAST: Fitting and Assessment of Synthetic Templates , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1803.008

    2018

  73. [85]

    Kriek M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2e75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L..31K 880, L31

    2019 doi

  74. [86]

    Kriek M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2df9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966...36K 966, 36

    2024 doi

  75. [87]

    Kroupa P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K 322, 231

    2001

  76. [88]

    Labb \'e I., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...624L..81L 624, L81

    2005 doi

  77. [89]

    B., Tinsley B

    Larson R. B., Tinsley B. M., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155753 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...219...46L 219, 46

    1978 doi

  78. [90]

    C., Faber S

    Lee H.-c., Worthey G., Trager S. C., Faber S. M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...664..215L 664, 215

    2007 doi

  79. [91]

    Lee H., et al., 2009, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/902 , 694, 902

    2009 doi

  80. [92]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.9529L 527, 9529

    Lee M. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.9529L 527, 9529

    2024 doi

  81. [93]

    H., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/adb285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..185L 169, 185

    Lee J. H., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/adb285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..185L 169, 185

    2025 doi

  82. [94]

    N., Ellis R

    Leethochawalit N., Kirby E. N., Ellis R. S., Moran S. M., Treu T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4809 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885..100L 885, 100

    2019 doi

  83. [95]

    D., Conroy C., van Dokkum P

    Leja J., Johnson B. D., Conroy C., van Dokkum P. G., Byler N., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..170L 837, 170

    2017 doi

  84. [96]

    C., Johnson B

    Leja J., Carnall A. C., Johnson B. D., Conroy C., Speagle J. S., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876....3L 876, 3

    doi

  85. [98]

    Leja J., et al., 2019c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d5a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..140L 877, 140

    doi

  86. [99]

    Leja J., Tacchella S., Conroy C., 2019d, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L...9L 880, L9

    doi

  87. [100]

    D., Conroy C., Dav \'e R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904...33L 904, 33

    Lower S., Narayanan D., Leja J., Johnson B. D., Conroy C., Dav \'e R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904...33L 904, 33

    2020 doi

  88. [101]

    Lu S., et al., 2025, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02391-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs...9..128L 9, 128

    2025 doi

  89. [102]

    A., Courteau S., Bell E., Holtzman J

    MacArthur L. A., Courteau S., Bell E., Holtzman J. A., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..152..175M 152, 175

    2004 doi

  90. [103]

    Maiolino R., Mannucci F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&ARv..27....3M 27, 3

    2019 doi

  91. [104]

    W., Feiden G

    Mann A. W., Feiden G. A., Gaidos E., Boyajian T., von Braun K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804...64M 804, 64

    2015 doi

  92. [105]

    Maraston C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.362..799M 362, 799

    2005

  93. [107]

    Maraston C., Daddi E., Renzini A., Cimatti A., Dickinson M., Papovich C., Pasquali A., Pirzkal N., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...652...85M 652, 85

    2006 doi

  94. [108]

    Matteucci F., 1994, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&A...288...57M 288, 57

    1994

  95. [109]

    J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...544A.156M 544, A156

    McCracken H. J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...544A.156M 544, A156

    2012 doi

  96. [110]

    T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804L...4M 804, L4

    Mendel J. T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804L...4M 804, L4

    2015 doi

  97. [111]

    Milone A. D. C., Sansom A. E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18457.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414.1227M 414, 1227

    2011

  98. [112]

    Moffat A. F. J., 1969, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969A&A.....3..455M 3, 455

    1969

  99. [113]

    G., Labb \'e I., Kriek M., Franx M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1839 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701.1839M 701, 1839

    Muzzin A., Marchesini D., van Dokkum P. G., Labb \'e I., Kriek M., Franx M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1839 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701.1839M 701, 1839

    2009 doi

  100. [114]

    Muzzin A., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/206/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..206....8M 206, 8

    doi

  101. [115]

    Muzzin A., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777...18M 777, 18

    doi

  102. [116]

    Nanayakkara T., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981...78N 981, 78

    2025 doi

  103. [117]

    Nersesian A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346769 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..94N 681, A94

    2024 doi

  104. [118]

    Nersesian A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..86N 695, A86

    2025 doi

  105. [119]

    B., Gunn J

    Oke J. B., Gunn J. E., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...266..713O 266, 713

    1983 doi

  106. [120]

    Pacifici C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/79 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...79P 832, 79

    2016 doi

  107. [121]

    Pacifici C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acacff , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944..141P 944, 141

    2023 doi

  108. [122]

    C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/322412 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...559..620P 559, 620

    Papovich C., Dickinson M., Ferguson H. C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/322412 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...559..620P 559, 620

    2001 doi

  109. [123]

    D., Leja J., Dotter A., Cargile P

    Park M., Conroy C., Johnson B. D., Leja J., Dotter A., Cargile P. A., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241021375P p. arXiv:2410.21375

    2024 arXiv

  110. [124]

    Peng Y., Maiolino R., Cochrane R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14439 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.521..192P 521, 192

    2015 doi

  111. [125]

    M., Salaris M., Cassisi S., Pietrinferni A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/427 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690..427P 690, 427

    Percival S. M., Salaris M., Cassisi S., Pietrinferni A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/427 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690..427P 690, 427

    2009 doi

  112. [126]

    Plat A., Charlot S., Bruzual G., Feltre A., Vidal-Garc \' a A., Morisset C., Chevallard J., Todt H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2616 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490..978P 490, 978

    2019 doi

  113. [127]

    A., Erb D

    Reddy N. A., Erb D. K., Pettini M., Steidel C. C., Shapley A. E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712.1070R 712, 1070

    2010 doi

  114. [128]

    A., Pettini M., Steidel C

    Reddy N. A., Pettini M., Steidel C. C., Shapley A. E., Erb D. K., Law D. R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...25R 754, 25

    2012 doi

  115. [129]

    Renzini A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092450 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ARA&A..44..141R 44, 141

    2006 arXiv

  116. [130]

    S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez P., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10699.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.371..703S 371, 703

    2006

  117. [131]

    Sawicki M., Yee H. K. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.1329S 115, 1329

    1998 doi

  118. [132]

    Scoville N., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172....1S 172, 1

    2007 doi

  119. [133]

    Searle L., Sargent W. L. W., Bagnuolo W. G., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/151882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...179..427S 179, 427

    1973 doi

  120. [134]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974..145S 974, 145

    Setton D. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974..145S 974, 145

    2024 doi

  121. [135]

    arXiv:2409.11457

    Siegel J., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.11457 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240911457S p. arXiv:2409.11457

    2024 doi arXiv

  122. [136]

    Slob M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad65ff , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973..131S 973, 131

    2024 doi

  123. [138]

    Spitoni E., Vincenzo F., Matteucci F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...599A...6S 599, A6

    2017 doi

  124. [139]

    Straatman C. M. S., et al., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/aae37a , 239, 27

    2018 doi

  125. [140]

    A., Kriek M., Price S

    Suess K. A., Kriek M., Price S. H., Barro G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4db3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885L..22S 885, L22

    2019 doi

  126. [141]

    A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac82b0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..146S 935, 146

    Suess K. A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac82b0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..146S 935, 146

    2022 doi

  127. [142]

    Tacchella S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac449b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..134T 926, 134

    2022 doi

  128. [143]

    Thomas D., Maraston C., Bender R., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06248.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.339..897T 339, 897

    2003

  129. [144]

    Thomas D., Maraston C., Bender R., Mendes de Oliveira C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/426932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...621..673T 621, 673

    2005 doi

  130. [145]

    M., 1972, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972A&A....20..383T 20, 383

    Tinsley B. M., 1972, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972A&A....20..383T 20, 383

    1972

  131. [146]

    Tortorelli L., McCullough J., Gruen D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450694 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.144T 689, A144

    2024 doi

  132. [148]

    C., Faber S

    Trager S. C., Faber S. M., Worthey G., Gonz \'a lez J. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120..165T 120, 165

    2000 doi

  133. [149]

    Trussler J., Maiolino R., Maraston C., Peng Y., Thomas D., Goddard D., Lian J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.5406T 491, 5406

    2020 doi

  134. [150]

    Vazdekis A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1023/A:1017536301933 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Ap&SS.276..921V 276, 921

    2001 doi

  135. [151]

    Vazdekis A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1177V 449, 1177

    2015 doi

  136. [152]

    Vazdekis A., Koleva M., Ricciardelli E., R \"o ck B., Falc \'o n-Barroso J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2231 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.3409V 463, 3409

    2016 doi

  137. [153]

    W., van Dokkum P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa72ed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..230...23V 230, 23

    Villaume A., Conroy C., Johnson B., Rayner J., Mann A. W., van Dokkum P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa72ed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..230...23V 230, 23

    2017 doi

  138. [154]

    Walcher J., Groves B., Budav \'a ri T., Dale D., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-010-0458-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Ap&SS.331....1W 331, 1

    2011 doi

  139. [155]

    E., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...719.1715W 719, 1715

    Whitaker K. E., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...719.1715W 719, 1715

    2010 doi

  140. [156]

    E., Kriek M., van Dokkum P

    Whitaker K. E., Kriek M., van Dokkum P. G., Bezanson R., Brammer G., Franx M., Labb \'e I., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/179 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...745..179W 745, 179

    2012 doi

  141. [157]

    E., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L39 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770L..39W 770, L39

    Whitaker K. E., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L39 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770L..39W 770, L39

    2013 doi

  142. [158]

    P., Endsley R., Leja J., Charlot S., Chevallard J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.5859W 519, 5859

    Whitler L., Stark D. P., Endsley R., Leja J., Charlot S., Chevallard J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.5859W 519, 5859

    2023 doi

  143. [159]

    Worthey G., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...95..107W 95, 107

    1994 doi

  144. [160]

    M., Gonzalez J

    Worthey G., Faber S. M., Gonzalez J. J., Burstein D., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192087 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...94..687W 94, 687

    1994 doi

  145. [161]

    Wuyts S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...655...51W 655, 51

    2007 doi

  146. [162]

    J., Hernquist L., Hopkins P

    Wuyts S., Franx M., Cox T. J., Hernquist L., Hopkins P. F., Robertson B. E., van Dokkum P. G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..348W 696, 348

    2009 doi

  147. [163]

    Zhuang Z., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc79b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948..132Z 948, 132

    2023 doi

  148. [164]

    Zibetti S., Charlot S., Rix H.-W., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1181Z 400, 1181

    2009

  149. [165]

    O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aae887 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867L..16Z 867, L16

    Zick T. O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aae887 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867L..16Z 867, L16

    2018 doi

  150. [166]

    da Cunha E., Charlot S., Elbaz D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388.1595D 388, 1595

    2008

  151. [167]

    de Graaff A., et al., 2025, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs...9..280D 9, 280

    2025 doi

  152. [168]

    van Houdt J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1f29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923...11V 923, 11

    2021 doi

  153. [169]

    G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..125V 799, 125

    van de Sande J., Kriek M., Franx M., Bezanson R., van Dokkum P. G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..125V 799, 125

    2015 doi

  154. [170]

    van der Wel A., et al., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/0067-0049/223/2/29 , 223, 29

    2016 doi

  155. [171]

    van der Wel A., et al., 2021, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1356 , 256, 44

    2021 doi

  156. [172]

    van der Wel A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83c5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...936....9V 936, 9

    2022 doi

  157. [173]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.