Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers with hyperbolic materials

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A hyperbolic-material cylinder can focus light beyond the diffraction limit, producing optical forces far stronger than conventional tweezers.

desk verdict A clever scaling proposal for hyperbolic nano-tweezers whose central device geometry is not actually modeled; the open channel breaks the auto-focusing argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19640 v1 pith:QFR4SL3I submitted 2025-07-25 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Evgenii E. Narimanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords opticaltweezershyperbolicmaterialsauto-focusingsubwavelengthfocusingnear-fieldtrappinghexagonalboronnitridepolylogarithmtrapstiffness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes an optical nano-tweezer built from a subwavelength cylinder of a hyperbolic material, such as hexagonal boron nitride, with a narrow open channel along its axis. Because high-wavevector light in a hyperbolic medium propagates at a nearly fixed cone angle, light scattered at the cylinder edge refocuses repeatedly on the axis, forming a train of subwavelength hot spots. The paper argues that the field at these spots is amplified by the material quality factor $Q$, so the maximum trapping force scales as $Q^2$ and the optical trap stiffness scales as $Q^3$, exceeding conventional tweezers by several orders of magnitude at the same illumination. If this holds, a focused laser-pointer beam could trap and move nanoparticles with nanometer accuracy, and tuning the illumination frequency would shift the trap position.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is auto-focusing in a subwavelength hyperbolic cylinder. In a uniaxial hyperbolic medium the iso-frequency surface is a hyperboloid, so high-wavevector waves carry energy at the fixed angle $\vartheta = \arctan\left(\operatorname{Re}\sqrt{-\epsilon_\perp/\epsilon_\parallel}\right)$ to the symmetry axis; scattering of uniform illumination at the cylinder edge launches a converging conical sheet that focuses on the axis, reflects from the opposite wall, and refocuses periodically. The axial field is summed analytically as a polylogarithm $\operatorname{Li}_{1/2}$ of the round-trip phase, and its near-focus form is a Lorentzian-like resonance with width $z_f/Q$. This coherent multiple-scattering sum is the object that converts the material quality factor $Q$ into the $Q^2$ force and $Q^3$ stiffness enhancements.

What would settle it

A direct experiment would place a dielectric nanoparticle in the axial channel of a subwavelength hBN cylinder, illuminate with a tunable mid-infrared laser at ~50 W/cm${}^2$, and measure the trap position and stiffness as a function of wavelength. The model predicts the focus moves according to $z_1 = R \cot\vartheta(\omega)$ and the stiffness scales as $(\lambda_0/R)^2 Q^3$; observing instead a fixed hot spot, no frequency-dependent motion, or a stiffness that scales with ordinary field intensity would rule out the coherent auto-focusing explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a hyperbolic-material cylinder under uniform illumination acts as a diffraction-unlimited focusing device: the axial electric field is a coherent polylogarithmic sum of high-wavevector contributions that converge, reflect, and refocus, producing focal spots at $z_n = (2n-1) R \cot\vartheta$ with $\vartheta$ the hyperbolic cone angle set by $\sqrt{-\epsilon_\perp/\epsilon_\parallel}$. Near the $n$-th focus the field has a resonance whose axial width is $(2n-1) z_f / Q$, and this is what converts the hyperbolic quality factor into a $Q^2$ enhancement of the optical force and a $Q^3$ enhancement of the trap stiffness relative to free-space tweezers. The paper concludes that for natural hyperbolic materials with $Q \gtrsim 10$, and $R < \lambda_0/10$, the trap stiffness is improved by more than five orders of magnitude, and that atoms and molecules could be stably trapped at intensities far below the material damage threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The whole enhancement rests on the assumption that the many high-wavevector rays scattered into the cylinder all travel at the same cone angle, reflect totally at the wall, and stay phase-coherent through many bounces, so that they pile up at a series of foci; losses, dispersion, or the open channel that break that coherence would destroy the $Q^2$ and $Q^3$ scaling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With a subwavelength hBN cylinder and a central channel, a silica nanoparticle should experience an optical force exceeding its weight at an incident intensity near 50 W/cm${}^2$.
  • At the primary focus, the trap stiffness should exceed the stiffness of a conventional free-space optical trap by more than five orders of magnitude when $Q > 10$ and $R < \lambda_0/10$.
  • Because the focus position depends on frequency through $\vartheta(\omega)$, sweeping the illumination wavelength by about 10% should move the trap along the cylinder axis, giving nanometer-scale spatial control.
  • Using several illumination wavelengths simultaneously should create several independent focal spots, allowing multiple particles to be trapped and moved separately.
  • Stable trapping of individual atoms or small molecules at room temperature should require intensities around 5 GW/cm${}^2$, about four orders of magnitude below the damage threshold of hBN.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $Q^3$ stiffness scaling holds, thermal position fluctuations of a trapped particle would provide a direct experimental readout of the spring constant, giving a clean test of the coherent auto-focusing model without needing to measure the field directly.
  • The model assumes the open axial channel does not disturb the axial field because the radial component vanishes at $\rho = 0$; a full-wave simulation varying channel radius, wall reflection, and material anisotropy would show how wide the channel can be before the polylogarithmic sum breaks down.
  • The same coherent-refocusing picture may extend to other cylindrical hyperbolic or epsilon-near-zero resonators, but the specific $Q^2/Q^3$ scalings would need to be rederived for each material and geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an optical trapping platform called 'electromagnetic hyper-lift': a subwavelength cylinder of a natural hyperbolic material (hBN) with an open axial channel, illuminated at mid-infrared frequencies. The paper argues that auto-focusing of high-k hyperbolic waves creates a chain of subwavelength focal spots on the cylinder axis, and that the resulting gradient force on a nanoparticle in the channel can exceed the particle weight by orders of magnitude at laser-pointer intensities, while the trap stiffness is enhanced by more than five orders of magnitude relative to conventional tweezers. The analytic model expresses the on-axis field as a coherent polylogarithmic sum (Eq. 10), from which the focal-spot width, the maximum force (Eq. 15), the trap stiffness (Eq. 17), and the critical intensity for stable trapping (Eq. 22) are derived.

Significance. If the predicted scalings survive scrutiny, the hyper-lift would be a significant advance: it would enable stable trapping and manipulation of nanoparticles with nanometer accuracy at dramatically reduced intensities, and the frequency-controlled focal positions offer a route to parallel manipulation. The paper uses experimentally measured hBN permittivities and references an independent experiment (Ref. [23]) that observed the primary auto-focus in the reverse configuration, which lends some credibility to the underlying physical picture. However, the central derivation rests on an unproven ansatz for the axial field, and the actual device geometry (open channel) is not modeled.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (14)] The hyper-lift geometry includes an open axial channel of radius rc, but the axial field formula (Eq. 12) and the force/stiffness scalings (Eqs. 15, 17) are derived for a homogeneous hyperbolic cylinder. The justification that the radial field component 'vanishes in the limit ρ → 0' does not address the boundary conditions at ρ = rc. The high-k components that are essential for auto-focusing are evanescent in the vacuum channel, so the multiple-focus pattern of Eq. (8) is not a solution inside the channel. Consequently, the Q^2 and Q^3 enhancements are not established for the proposed device; this requires either a rigorous solution of the channel boundary-value problem or a full-wave simulation.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (10)] The central field expression is presented without derivation or validation. The assumptions underlying the coherent polylogarithm summation (constant cone angle, total reflection at the cylinder wall, phase coherence over many bounces) are not tested, and no full-wave simulation or experiment is provided to confirm Eq. (10) even for the solid cylinder. Since all subsequent force and stiffness results depend on this expression, its status as an ansatz is a load-bearing gap.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eq. (22) and following paragraph] The text states that "the square of the hyperbolic quality factor in the denominator" lowers the required intensity, but Eq. (22) contains 1/Q, not 1/Q^2. The atom-trapping estimate Ic ≈ 5 GW/cm^2 follows from the displayed formula. If the intended scaling is 1/Q^2, the derivation must be corrected; if the formula is correct, the text should be amended. Either way, the inconsistency undermines the quantitative claim for atomic trapping.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, before Eq. (9)] The word "focizn" appears to be a typo for "foci".
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The sentence "its radius Solid and dashed curves..." is incomplete; the particle radius value is missing.
  3. [Sec. 2, first paragraph] The conditions for one-sheet and two-sheet hyperboloids are printed identically as Re[ϵ∥] > 0, Re[ϵ⊥] < 0; please check the intended sign combination for the two-sheet case.
  4. [Eq. (22)] The prefactor in the first equality of Eq. (22) is written with absolute values; it may be clearer to define the dimensionless factor explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the force and stiffness predictions are derived from an explicit field model whose inputs are external experimental permittivity data, not from the target enhancements.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: the axial field in Eq. (10) and its focal approximation Eq. (12) are presented as analytical solutions for a hyperbolic cylinder, and the force ratio Eq. (15) and stiffness ratio Eq. (17) are then computed from that field using standard gradient-force expressions. The key inputs—hBN permittivity and hyperbolic quality factor Q—come from external measurements (Refs. 24, 25, 29), not from fitting or from assuming the claimed enhancement. The primary auto-focus is independently supported by the experimental work in Ref. 23. Self-citations (Refs. 19, 22, 34) appear in background statements about hyperbolic media and hot-spot movement, but those claims are also derived in the present paper via Eqs. (3) and (8), so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The channel perturbation concern raised in the skeptical review is a correctness risk about the validity of Eq. (12) inside the open channel, not a circularity of the derivation. Similarly, the apparent inconsistency between Eq. (22) and the text mentioning a squared Q in the denominator is an internal typo or wording issue, not a circular step. No prediction in the paper reduces by construction to an input parameter or to a uniqueness assertion from prior author work.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a field model (Eqs. 4-12) that is proposed in this paper rather than validated numerically or experimentally, plus external hBN permittivity data. No new particles or forces are introduced. The effective free parameters are the quality factor Q, cylinder radius R, incident field E0, and the unspecified nanoparticle radius behind Fig. 6.

free parameters (4)
  • Hyperbolic quality factor Q = Q ~ 30-100 (hBN, from Refs 24,25,29)
    External measured input, not fitted by this paper. Force scales as Q^2 and stiffness as Q^3, so the main quantitative claims are sensitive to this value.
  • Cylinder radius R = 100, 200, 500 nm in the examples
    Hand-chosen example radii; they set the focus positions zf = R cot(theta) and contribute a factor (lambda0/R)^2 to the stiffness enhancement.
  • Incident field amplitude E0 = 200 V/cm (~50 W/cm2)
    Hand-chosen to represent a laser-pointer-level intensity; the optical force scales as E0^2.
  • Nanoparticle radius
    Used in Fig. 6 for the fused silica nanoparticle, but the caption is cut off and the radius value is missing, preventing reproduction of the figure.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Uniaxial hyperbolic permittivity with Re[eps_parallel] and Re[eps_perp] of opposite sign supports high-k TM modes with group velocity at the cone angle.
    Invoked in Eqs. (1)-(3); standard for hyperbolic phonon polaritons in hBN and supported by cited measurements.
  • ad hoc to paper The scattered near field of a dipole at the hyperbolic medium surface is given by Eq. (4), singular on the cone, with finite-loss peak scaling as Eq. (5).
    This is the paper's own field model; Eq. (5) is stated without derivation or comparison to a full-wave solver.
  • ad hoc to paper Coherent summation of totally reflected conical rays yields Eq. (10), including the Li_{1/2} polylogarithm.
    No derivation or numerical verification is given; requires equal cone angle and total internal reflection for all high-k components over multiple bounces.
  • ad hoc to paper The field in the open channel is the axial field because the radial field component vanishes at rho approaching 0, for rc < Delta z1.
    Used to move from Eq. (12) to optical forces; the radial field profile and radial trapping force are never computed.
  • standard math Stable trapping requires U >> k_B T with U from the gradient force.
    Standard optical tweezers criterion, used in Eqs. (19)-(22).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers with hyperbolic materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QFR4SL3I

@misc{pith2026250719640,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers with hyperbolic materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QFR4SL3I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19640}
}
read the original abstract

Optical tweezers, formed by tightly focused propagating laser beams, offer the unique capability to trap and control microscopic particles over a broad size range. However, the diffraction inherent to propagating optical fields, limits the resulting resolution and the accuracy of particle manipulation. Here we show that the phenomenon of ``auto-focusing'' inherent to hyperbolic materials in cylinder geometry, can be used for spatial control with nanometer accuracy. Furthermore, due to highly efficient light focusing in hyperbolic media that is not restricted by diffraction, the resulting electromagnetically induced forces exceed those of conventional optical tweezers by several orders of magnitude, which allows more efficient particle manipulation at reduced illumination intensity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19640 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Light propagation and scattering in a hyperbolic medium. Panel (a) : the iso-frequency surface for light in a uxiaxial hyperbolic material with Re [ϵz] < 0, Re [ϵx] ≡ Re [ϵx] > 0 (corresponding to e.g. lower-frequency hyperbolic band of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) [24, 25] – see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The dielectric permittivity of the hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), showing its (a) lower- and (b) higher-frequency hyperbolic bands.[24, 25] The red and blue colors show respectively the dielectric permittivity components parallel (ϵ∥ ) and perpendicular (ϵ⊥) to the symmetry axis of hBN. Solid lines correspond to real and dashed curves to the imaginary parts of the permittivity. Light green shading shows the regions … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Auto-focusing in a hyperbolic cylinder resonator. Panel (a) : the schematics of the system geometry. Light (red arrows) is incident on a cylinder formed by a uniaxial hyperbolic material with its symmetry axis in the longitudinal direction. Gold metal cladding, surrounding the cylinder, is not necessary and only used here to suppress the intensity outside the resonator for easier visualization of the electric field … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: where we show the field intensity at the axis of an hBN cylinder (normalized to that of the incident light) as a function of the distance from the top interface z and and the illumination frequency ω, for both its (a) lower- and (b) higher-frequency hyperbolic bands. (…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel (a) : the schematics of the optical “hyper-lift”, formed by an open channel at the symmetry axis of a hyperbolic material cylinder. Panels (b), (c) : light scattered by the edge of a hyperbolic material cylinder is naturally focused at the cylinder axis; the posi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The optical force acting on a spherical nano-particle in the cylinder “tunnel’ at the axis of hexagonal boron nitride cylinder (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Yang A H J, Moore S D, Schmidt B S, Klug M, Lipson M, Erickson D 2009 Optical manipulation of nanoparticles and biomolecules in sub-wavelength slot waveguides Nature 457 71 - 75

    work page 2009

  2. [1]

    Introduction Optical tweezers [1, 2, 3] are highly focused laser beams used to trap and manipulate microscopic particles, from biological cells [4] to individual molecules.[5] Pioneered by Arthur Ashkin in 1970 [2] and developed in the 1980s,[3] optical tweezers have now become invaluable tools in many fields, from molecular biology [6] and biophysics[7] ...

    work page 1970

  3. [2]

    light cone

    Light in Hyperbolic Media In a uniaxial medium, TM-polarized propagating waves are characterized by the dispersion ϵ∥k2 ∥ + ϵ⊥k2 ⊥ = ϵ⊥ϵ∥ ω2/c2, (1) where the subscripts ∥ and ⊥ represent the directions respectively parallel and perpendicular to the symmetry axis. When the real parts of the two orthogonal components of the permittivity, ϵ∥ and ϵ⊥, have op...

    work page

  4. [3]

    auto-focusing

    Auto-Focusing in Hyperbolic Resonators The unique conical sheet pattern on light propagation in a uniaxial hyperbolic medium, lead to the phenomenon of optical “auto-focusing” in a cylindrical waveguide with subwavelength cross-section. With uniform illumination (see Fig. 3(a)) the rotational symmetry of the problem together with the requirement of scatte...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Hyper-Lift

    Optical “Hyper-Lift” and Hyperbolic Nano-tweezers High optical intensity at the axis of the hyperbolic material cylinder and tight subwavelength focusing, can be used for highly efficient trapping of the small particle with nanometer-scale spatial control and manipulation. Introducing a narrow open channel at the axis of the hyperbolic cylinder (see Fig. ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    optical reactor

    Discussion Highly efficient light focusing in hyperbolic media, unlimited by optical diffraction, offers the optical trapping capabilities not readily available in other platforms. As the signal- to-noise ratio in experiments with optical tweezers,[35] typically increases linearly with the optical trap stiffness, its improvement by five orders of magnitud...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Acknowledgements This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation DMREF program, Award 2119157

    work page

  8. [7]

    Halma M T J, Xu L 2024 Life under tension: the relevance of force on biological polymers Biophysics Reports 10(1) 48 - 56

    work page 2024

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    McGloin D 2006 Optical tweezers: 20 years on Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 3521 - 3537

    2006

  2. [9]

    Ashkin A 1970 Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure Phys. Rev. Lett. 24 (4) 156 - 159

    1970

  3. [10]

    Ashkin A, Dziedzic J M, Bjorkholm J E, Chu S 1986 Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles Opt. Lett. 11 (5), 288 - 290

    1986

  4. [11]

    Ashkin A, Dziedzic J M, Yamane T 1987 Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams Nature 330 769 - 771

    1987

  5. [12]

    hot spot

    leading to the development of the plasmonic optical tweezers.[13, 14, 15] The idea of using the rapid variation of the evanescent near-fields to optically trap nanoscale objects arXiv:2507.19640v1 [physics.optics] 25 Jul 2025 Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers w...

    2025 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Ruttley D K, Guttridge A, Hepworth T R and Cornish S L 2024 Enhanced Quantum Control of Individual Ultracold Molecules Using Optical Tweezer Arrays PRX Quantum bf 5 020333 Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers with hyperbolic materials 11

    2024

  7. [14]

    Choudhary D, Mossa A, Jadhav M and Cecconi C 2019 Bio-Molecular Applications of Recent Developments in Optical Tweezers Biomolecules 9(1) 23

    2019

  8. [15]

    Sneh T, Corsetti S, Notaros M, Kikkeri K, Voldman J and Notaros J 2024 Optical tweezing of microparticles and cells using silicon-photonics-based optical phased arrays Nature Communications 15, 8493

    2024

  9. [16]

    Peterman E J G 2023 Structural and mechanical insights into DNA and chromosomes under strain using optical tweezers and fluorescence microscopy Proceedings of SPIE 12649 1264902

    2023

  10. [17]

    Arbore C, Perego L, Sergides M and Capitanio M 2019 Probing force in living cells with optical tweezers: from single-molecule mechanics to cell mechanotransduction Biophysical Reviews 11 765 - 782

    2019

  11. [18]

    Eechampati A and de Silva C 2022 Utilization of Optical Tweezer Nanotechnology in Membrane Interaction Studies Applied Nano 3 (1), 43 - 53

    2022

  12. [19]

    Novotny L, Bian R X, Xie X S 1997 Theory of nanometric optical tweezers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 645 - 648

    1997

  13. [20]

    Photonics 2 365 - 370

    Grigorenko A N, Roberts N W, Dickinson M R, Zhang Y 2008 Nanometric optical tweezers based on nanostructured substrates Nat. Photonics 2 365 - 370

    2008

  14. [21]

    Photonics 5 349 - 356

    Juan M L, Righini M, Quidant R 2011 Plasmon nano-optical tweezers Nat. Photonics 5 349 - 356

    2011

  15. [22]

    Shoji T, Tsuboi Y 2014 Plasmonic optical tweezers toward molecular manipulation: Tailoring plasmonic nanostructure, light source, and resonant trapping J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 2957 - 2967

    2014

  16. [24]

    10 99 - 104

    Mandal S, Serey X, Erickson D 2010 Nanomanipulation using silicon photonic crystal resonators Nano Lett. 10 99 - 104

    2010

  17. [25]

    Kim S, Jin J, Kim Y J, Park I Y, Kim Y, Kim S W 2008 High-harmonic generation by resonant plasmon field enhancement Nature 453 757 - 760

    2008

  18. [26]

    Jacob Z, Alekseyev L V, Narimanov E 2006 Optical Hyperlens: Far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit Opt Express 14(18) 8247 - 56

    2006

  19. [27]

    Salandrino A and Engheta N 2006 Far-field subdiffraction optical microscopy using metamaterial crystals: Theory and simulations Phys. Rev. B 74 075103

    2006

  20. [28]

    Ishii S, Kildishev A V, Narimanov E, Shalaev V M and Drachev V P 2013 Sub-wavelength interference pattern from volume plasmon polaritons in a hyperbolic medium Laser Photonics Rev. 7 265

    2013

  21. [29]

    Narimanov E 2016 Hyperstructured Illumination ACS Photonics 3 (6) 1090 - 1094

    2016

  22. [30]

    He M, Iyer G R S, Aarav S, Sunku S S, Giles A J, Folland T G, Sharac N, Sun X, Matson J, Liu S, Edgar J H, Fleischer J W, Basov D N, and Caldwell J D 2021Ultrahigh-Resolution, Label-Free Hyperlens Imaging in the Mid-IR Nano Letters 21 (19) 7921 - 7928

  23. [31]

    Nat Commun

    Caldwell J D, Kretinin A V, Chen Y, Giannini V, Fogler M M, Francescato Y, Ellis C T, Tischler J G, Woods C R, Giles AJ , Hong M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Maier S A, Novoselov K S 2014 Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal bo...

    2014

  24. [32]

    Li P, Lewin M, Kretinin A V, Caldwell J D, Novoselov K S, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Gaussmann F, Taubner T 2015 Hyperbolic phonon-polaritons in boron nitride for near-field optical imaging and focusing Nat. Commun. 6 7507

    2015

  25. [33]

    Dai S, Ma Q, Andersen T, Mcleod A S, Fei Z, Liu M K, Wagner M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Thiemens M, Keilmann F, Jarillo-Herrero P, Fogler M M, Basov D N 2015 Subdiffractional focusing and guiding of polaritonic rays in a natural hyperbolic material Nat Commun. 6 6963

    2015

  26. [34]

    Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers with hyperbolic materials 12 Nat Commun

    Lee I H, He M, Zhang X, Luo Y, Liu S, Edgar J H, Wang K, Avouris P, Low T, Caldwell J D, Oh S H 2020 Image polaritons in boron nitride for extreme polariton confinement with low losses. Electromagnetic Hyper-Lift: optical nano-tweezers with hyperbolic materials 12 Nat Commun. ...

    2020

  27. [35]

    23(4) 499 - 505

    Sheinfux H H, Orsini L, Jung M, Torre I, Ceccanti M, Marconi S, Maniyara R, Barcons Ruiz D, H¨ otger A, Bertini R, Castilla S, Hesp NCH, Janzen E, Holleitner A, Pruneri V, Edgar JH, Shvets G, Koppens F H L 2024 High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperb...

    2024

  28. [36]

    17(2) 134 - 139

    Giles A J, Dai S, Vurgaftman I, Hoffman T, Liu S, Lindsay L, Ellis C T, Assefa N, Chatzakis I, Reinecke T L, Tischler J G, Fogler M M, Edgar J H, Basov D N, Caldwell J D 2018 Ultralow-loss polaritons in isotopically pure boron nitride Nat Mater. 17(2) 134 - 139

    2018

  29. [37]

    Nat Commun 15, 8803

    Lu Z, Ji J, Ye H, Zhang H, Zhang S and Xu H 2024 Quantifying the ultimate limit of plasmonic near-field enhancement. Nat Commun 15, 8803

    2024

  30. [38]

    Xian L, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hone J, Rubio A, Gaeta A L, Ginsberg S, Jadidi M M 2023 Phonon-enhanced nonlinearities in hexagonal boron nitride Nat

    Ginsberg J S, Mehdi JM, Zhang J, Chen C Y, Tancogne-Dejean N, Chae S H, Patwardhan G N. Xian L, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hone J, Rubio A, Gaeta A L, Ginsberg S, Jadidi M M 2023 Phonon-enhanced nonlinearities in hexagonal boron nitride Nat. Commun. 14 7685

    2023

  31. [39]

    Tancogne-Dejean N, Rubio A, 2018 Atomic-like high-harmonic generation from two-dimensional materials Sci. Adv. 4 eaao5207

    2018

  32. [40]

    Chen C Y, Moore S L, Maiti R, Ginsberg J S, Jadidi M M, Li B, Chae S H, Rajendran A, Patwardhan G N, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hone J, Basov D N, Gaeta AL 2024 Unzipping hBN with ultrashort mid-infrared pulses Sci. Adv. 10(18) eadi3653

    2024

  33. [41]

    Narimanov E, Kildishev A 2015 Naturally hyperbolic Nature Photonics 9 214 - 216

    2015

  34. [42]

    Neuman K C and Block S M 2004) Optical trapping Review of Scientific Instruments 75(9) 2787 - 2809

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.