Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Radio Map Estimation in Generative Wireless Networks

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A conditional diffusion model turns sparse signal samples and transmitter locations into accurate radio maps.

desk verdict A plausible conditional-DDPM radio map generator whose reported accuracy is unsupported because the described fragment encoder never sees where fragments are. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06604 v1 pith:QGEA6VP5 submitted 2025-01-11 cs.NI

Xuanhao Luo , Zhizhen Li , Zhiyuan Peng , Mingzhe Chen , Yuchen Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NI
keywords radiomapestimationdenoisingdiffusionprobabilisticmodelsconditionalmodelgenerativewirelessnetworksmillimeter-waveWLANsub-6GHzRSSfragmentselectionraytracing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model, called RM-Gen, can reconstruct a complete radio map from very little measured information: a handful of received-signal-strength fragments or, in the simplest case, only the coordinates of the transmitters. The authors report accuracy above 95% for indoor 60 GHz WLANs and about 90% for outdoor sub-6 GHz cellular environments when RSS fragments make up 5–15% of the map, with RM-Gen outperforming cGAN and pix2pix baselines by roughly 10–20 percentage points. The practical stake is that radio maps, which are normally obtained through expensive measurement campaigns or slow ray-tracing simulations, could be generated cheaply enough for routine network planning, digital-twin modeling, and drone coverage optimization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the conditional denoising diffusion process. Given a ground-truth radio map $x_0$, a schedule of Gaussian noises produces a noisy map $x_t = \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_t} x_0 + \sqrt{1-\bar{\alpha}_t} \epsilon$; the model learns a denoising function $\epsilon_\theta(x_t, t | e_\theta(c))$ implemented by a U-Net, a convolutional encoder-decoder network, conditioned on $e_\theta(c)$, an encoding of the available information $c$. For RSS fragments, $e_\theta$ flattens and concatenates fragment vectors and passes them through a three-layer MLP; for transmitter locations, it concatenates learned embeddings of each coordinate. Because the loss is simply the mean squared error between predicted and actual noise, the same training loop works for either condition. The environment-aware fragment selection algorithm divides the scenario into subareas, counts obstacle density in each, and chooses fragments centered in the densest subareas, which are presumed to carry the most propagation information.

What would settle it

Run the same RM-Gen pipeline with real field measurements in a 60 GHz indoor office and a 3.7 GHz outdoor site, using exactly 5%, 10%, and 15% RSS fragments and the same ETR=0.10 rule; if accuracy falls below the reported 95% indoor and 90% outdoor levels, or if pix2pix matches or beats RM-Gen, the central claim fails. Before that, a cheaper check is to inspect the dataset split: if held-out test maps share AP positions, layouts, or fragment locations with training maps, the reported numbers are inflated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that radio map estimation can be posed as a conditional generation problem and solved with a denoising diffusion probabilistic model: a forward process adds Gaussian noise to a ground-truth map over 400 time steps, and a U-Net trained to remove that noise, guided by an encoded condition, generates the map in reverse. Two kinds of conditions work: flattened RSS fragments processed by an MLP encoder, and embedded transmitter coordinates. The paper further claims that the choice of which fragments to measure matters, and that sorting candidate locations by local obstacle density yields accuracy close to human expert selection while random selection lags far behind. On the authors' ray-traced datasets, RM-Gen achieves 96.85–98.09% accuracy on indoor mmWave maps and 89.54–90.97% on outdoor sub-6 GHz maps at ETR=0.10 with RSS fragments, and 81.95% indoor and 74.26% outdoor with Tx locations alone.

Load-bearing premise

The reported accuracy numbers rest on two linked assumptions: that ray-traced maps stand in for real-world received signal strength measurements, and that training and test maps come from the same distribution without leakage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Radio map generation no longer requires a full environmental model: sparse RSS fragments alone are enough for high-accuracy reconstruction in the tested indoor scenario.
  • Planning can happen before deployment: with only planned transmitter positions as input, RM-Gen still produces usable maps, supporting access point placement and UAV trajectory design without measurements.
  • The environment-aware selection rule gives network operators a no-expert alternative to manual fragment placement, closing most of the gap to human-labeled selection.
  • At the tested fragment fractions, RM-Gen outperforms cGAN and pix2pix in every reported configuration, suggesting that iterative denoising is better suited than adversarial training to reconstructing fine-grained signal structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that its ground truth is ray-traced rather than measured; a real-world deployment could show a smaller accuracy gap over baselines if ray tracing misses material, weather, or motion effects.
  • The paper never states the train/test split, so a necessary check is whether held-out scenarios differ in AP locations, layouts, and fragment placements; if they overlap, the reported accuracies could be optimistic.
  • A natural extension the paper only mentions in passing is fusing both conditions, RSS fragments plus transmitter coordinates, through a shared attention or MLP module; this could lift the weaker Tx-location-only results.
  • The ETR=0.10 metric treats any pixel within 10% of ground truth as correct; tasks like beam management may require stricter spatial accuracy, so the headline percentages are not end-to-end task performance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. RM-Gen is a conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model that estimates complete radio maps from either sparse RSS fragments or transmitter locations. The paper formulates the problem as a conditional generation task, designs separate encoders for the two condition types, and proposes an environment-aware fragment-selection heuristic based on obstacle density. Training and test data are generated with the Wireless InSite ray tracer for indoor 60 GHz and outdoor 3.7 GHz scenarios. The experiments report that RM-Gen reaches 96.85% indoor and 89.54% outdoor accuracy at ETR=0.10 with 5% RSS fragments, outperforming cGAN and pix2pix baselines (Tables II and III). The paper also shows visual map comparisons and two downstream use cases.

Significance. If the reported evaluations are reproducible, the paper provides the first demonstration that conditional diffusion models can estimate radio maps from sparse measurements and Tx coordinates, with a practical fragment-selection algorithm. Strengths include the standard DDPM training objective (Eq. 14), explicit pseudocode for training, sampling, and fragment selection, and the construction of two sizeable synthetic datasets (~30k and ~26k maps). The environment-aware selection method is a reasonable heuristic and is shown to outperform random selection. However, the central claim depends on a conditioning mechanism whose current description is underspecified, and the evaluation protocol lacks a defined train/test split and exact metric formula. These issues must be resolved before the empirical claims can be accepted.

major comments (5)
  1. [IV.B, Eqs. (15)-(18)] The RSS-fragment encoder described by Eqs. (15)-(18) concatenates flattened RSS values only; it does not include fragment coordinates, a spatial mask, or any positional embedding in e_theta(c). Such a condition vector is permutation-invariant across fragments and cannot align a measured fragment to its location in the N by N map. Table II reports 96.85% accuracy at 5% fragments, which cannot be explained by the described architecture unless the experiment supplies location information implicitly (e.g., fixed fragment positions or a hidden coordinate channel). Please state precisely what input the encoder receives and, if the implementation used positional information, include that in the description.
  2. [V, experimental setup] The paper does not specify how the approximately 30,000 (RM-In) and 26,000 (RM-Out) radio maps are split into training, validation, and test sets. Without this split, it is unclear whether the reported accuracies reflect memorization of seen scenario configurations or generalization to unseen AP locations and environments. Please describe the split criterion (e.g., by random map, by AP position, or by environment layout) and confirm that test maps are not used in training.
  3. [V.B, ETR definition] The Error Tolerance Rate is defined only verbally as "the maximum allowable percentage difference" and "a performance difference ratio of 10% is acceptable." The exact formula is missing: it is not stated whether accuracy is the fraction of grid points with relative error below the threshold, the mean over the map, or a normalized RSS error. Since all headline numbers (Tables II-III, Figs. 6-7, 12) depend on this metric, please give the precise definition, including how negative RSS values (in dBm) are handled.
  4. [V.D, baseline comparison] The cGAN and pix2pix baselines are described at a high level, but no hyperparameters (learning rates, number of epochs, optimizer settings, or discriminator architecture beyond "MLP-based") are given. Without evidence that these baselines were tuned to a comparable degree, the reported 20%+ margin over cGAN and about 10% over pix2pix in Table II may reflect undertuned baselines. Please provide baseline training details and report mean and standard deviation over multiple random seeds.
  5. [IV.D, data collection] The comparison and all conclusions are grounded in ray-tracing-generated ground-truth maps. The two citations [47], [48] support general closeness of ray tracing to measurements, but the specific indoor and outdoor layouts in this paper are not validated against real RSS measurements. Since both RM-Gen and the baselines are trained and tested on the same simulator, the relative ranking may survive, but the absolute accuracy figures may not transfer to physical deployments; please add a discussion of this limitation and, if possible, a small real-data validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [IV.C, Algorithm 3] The word "popouted" in the sentence following Algorithm 3 appears to be a typo; it should be "output" or "selected."
  2. [V.D] The phrase "out door" in the comparison paragraph should be "outdoor."
  3. [IV.B, Eq. (19)] In Eq. (19), the text states "where L denotes the concatenation," which appears to be a typo for the concatenation symbol (e.g., the big oplus used in Eq. 16) or should be written explicitly as "where the big operation denotes concatenation."
  4. [V.E] The reference to "Fig. 11(b)" for the BS/UAV use case is likely incorrect; the use-case figure appears to be Fig. 13(b), since Fig. 11 shows an outdoor radio map comparison.
  5. [Abstract and V.B] The abstract claims "over 95% accuracy" for both 60 GHz and sub-6GHz networks, but the reported outdoor accuracy is around 90% at ETR=0.10 (Fig. 7(b), Table II); the conclusion's wording (95% indoor, 90% outdoor) is more accurate and should be used consistently.
  6. [Notation and figures] Table I uses "T x" while equations use "Tx"; please unify the notation. Also, Figs. 6, 7, and 12 use "accuracy" without a formal definition; once the ETR formula is provided, define "accuracy" in the figure captions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the DDPM objective, condition encoders, and fragment-selection heuristic are not fitted to the evaluation metric and the reported gains are not forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its stated inputs. The conditional DDPM training objective (Eq. 14) is the standard DDPM noise-prediction loss from Ho et al. [28], with the condition c injected through the encoders in Eqs. 15-19; no term in the loss, in the sampling procedure (Algorithms 1-2), or in the accuracy metric is fitted to the reported ETR accuracy values. The environment-aware fragment selection (Algorithm 3) is a heuristic based on obstacle density from the geometric map G and does not embed the ground-truth radio map or the evaluation metric. The comparison against cGAN and pix2pix uses the same condition encoders and datasets, so RM-Gen's advantage is not guaranteed by construction. The only self-citation, [45], is an extension statement rather than load-bearing evidence. The skeptic's point that the fragment encoder appears to omit fragment coordinates is a potential architectural under-specification or implementation gap, not a circular reduction, so it does not raise the circularity score; likewise, using the same ray-tracing simulator for training and evaluation is a soundness/generalization concern, not a circularity concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger captures the standard DDPM machinery, the simulation-to-real assumption for ray-tracing, and hand-chosen training hyperparameters. No new physical entities or fabricated constants are introduced. The central performance claim depends on the ray-tracing ground truth being trustworthy and on the chosen hyperparameters, neither of which is independently verified.

free parameters (4)
  • Diffusion time steps T=400 = 400
    Hand-chosen hyperparameter for the forward/reverse diffusion process, not fitted to the data.
  • Variance schedule endpoints beta_1 and beta_T = 1e-4 to 0.02
    Linear variance schedule chosen by hand, a standard DDPM configuration.
  • Learning rate and epochs for RSS fragment condition = gamma=1e-4, 100 epochs
    Training hyperparameters chosen without reported tuning or sensitivity analysis.
  • Learning rate and epochs for Tx location condition = gamma=1e-5, 50 epochs
    Training hyperparameters chosen for the second condition; no justification given.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The DDPM training objective and reverse-process parameterization from Ho et al. [28] are correct and applicable here.
    Invoked in Section III.B to define the loss and sampling equations (Eq. 9-14).
  • domain assumption Ray-tracing with Wireless InSite produces radio maps close to real measurements for the simulated environments.
    Stated in Section IV.D, citing [47], [48]. This underpins the use of synthetic data as ground truth.
  • domain assumption The specific indoor (office/lab) and outdoor (coastal) ray-tracing scenarios are representative of real deployment environments.
    Implicit throughout Section V; no real-world validation is performed.
  • domain assumption The U-Net architecture can effectively approximate the conditional denoising function for radio maps.
    Assumed in Section IV.A without architectural details or ablation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Radio Map Estimation in Generative Wireless Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QGEA6VP5

@misc{pith2026250106604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Radio Map Estimation in Generative Wireless Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QGEA6VP5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06604}
}
read the original abstract

The increasing demand for high-speed and reliable wireless networks has driven advancements in technologies such as millimeter-wave and 5G radios, which requires efficient planning and timely deployment of wireless access points. A critical tool in this process is the radio map, a graphical representation of radio-frequency signal strengths that plays a vital role in optimizing overall network performance. However, existing methods for estimating radio maps face challenges due to the need for extensive real-world data collection or computationally intensive ray-tracing analyses, which is costly and time-consuming. Inspired by the success of generative AI techniques in large language models and image generation, we explore their potential applications in the realm of wireless networks. In this work, we propose RM-Gen, a novel generative framework leveraging conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic models to synthesize radio maps using minimal and readily collected data. We then introduce an environment-aware method for selecting critical data pieces, enhancing the generative model's applicability and usability. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that RM-Gen achieves over 95% accuracy in generating radio maps for networks that operate at 60 GHz and sub-6GHz frequency bands, outperforming the baseline GAN and pix2pix models. This approach offers a cost-effective, adaptable solution for various downstream network optimization tasks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Radio maps with different base station (BS)/AP locations (denoted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of our conditional diffusion model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 3-D scenario layout of (a) an indoor scenario and (b) an outdoor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model loss curve using (a) partial RSS fragments and (b) Tx locations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Map generation process over T steps. In the second part, we utilize Tx locations as conditions to generate radio maps. We set the learning rate γ = 10−5 and use Adam to adjust γ across 50 epochs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Generation accuracy using partial RSS fragments for (a) indoor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: RSS distribution for indoor mmWave WLANs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: RSS distribution for outdoor sub-6GHz networks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visualization of generated radio maps for indoor cases. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Use cases of our RM-Gen. wireless APs as the Tx sources, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    6G wireless channel measurements and models: Trends and challenges,

    C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, H. Wang, X. Gao, X. You, and Y . Hao, “6G wireless channel measurements and models: Trends and challenges,” IEEE V ehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 22–32, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [48]

    Comparison of ray tracing simulations and millimeter wave channel sounding mea- surements,

    B. Neekzad, K. Sayrafian-Pour, J. Perez, and J. S. Baras, “Comparison of ray tracing simulations and millimeter wave channel sounding mea- surements,” in 2007 IEEE 18th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications . IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–5

    work page 2007

  3. [1]

    A survey of wireless path loss prediction and coverage mapping methods,

    C. Phillips, D. Sicker, and D. Grunwald, “A survey of wireless path loss prediction and coverage mapping methods,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 255–270, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [2]

    Contextual Combinatorial Beam Management via Online Probing for Multiple Access mmWave Wireless Networks

    Z. Li, X. Luo, M. Chen, C. Xu, S. Mao, and Y . Liu, “Contextual combinatorial beam management via online probing for multiple access mmwave wireless networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10385 , 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [3]

    Context-aware beam man- agement via online probing in combinatorial multi-armed bandits,

    Z. Li, X. Luo, M. Chen, C. Xu, and Y . Liu, “Context-aware beam man- agement via online probing in combinatorial multi-armed bandits,” in ICC 2024-IEEE International Conference on Communications . IEEE, 2024, pp. 3202–3207

    work page 2024

  6. [4]

    Network digital twin: Context, enabling technologies, and opportuni- ties,

    P. Almasan, M. Ferriol-Galm ´es, J. Paillisse, J. Su ´arez-Varela, D. Perino, D. L ´opez, A. A. P. Perales, P. Harvey, L. Ciavaglia, L. Wong et al. , “Network digital twin: Context, enabling technologies, and opportuni- ties,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 22–27, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [5]

    Optimizing synchronization delay for digital twin over wireless networks,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, Y . Liu, and Z. Zhang, “Optimizing synchronization delay for digital twin over wireless networks,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Pro- cessing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 9106–9110

    work page 2024

  8. [6]

    A joint communication and computation framework for digital twin over wireless networks,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, Y . Liu, and Z. Zhang, “A joint communication and computation framework for digital twin over wireless networks,” IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing , 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 51 references
  1. [7]

    Closed-form beamforming aided joint optimization for spectrum-and energy-efficient UA V-BS networks,

    K. Li, X. Zhu, Y . Jiang, and F.-C. Zheng, “Closed-form beamforming aided joint optimization for spectrum-and energy-efficient UA V-BS networks,” in 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBE- COM). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  2. [8]

    Analysis of drone as- sisted network coded cooperation for next generation wireless network,

    P. Kumar, P. Singh, S. Darshi, and S. Shailendra, “Analysis of drone as- sisted network coded cooperation for next generation wireless network,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2019

    2019

  3. [9]

    Ray tracing for radio propagation modeling: Principles and applications,

    Z. Yun and M. F. Iskander, “Ray tracing for radio propagation modeling: Principles and applications,” IEEE access, vol. 3, pp. 1089–1100, 2015

    2015

  4. [10]

    Map-driven mmwave link quality prediction with spatial-temporal mobility awareness,

    Z. Li, M. Chen, G. Li, X. Lin, and Y . Liu, “Map-driven mmwave link quality prediction with spatial-temporal mobility awareness,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2024

    2024

  5. [11]

    Environment-aware link quality prediction for millimeter-wave wireless lans,

    Y . Liu and D. M. Blough, “Environment-aware link quality prediction for millimeter-wave wireless lans,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access , 2022, pp. 1–10

    2022

  6. [12]

    Kriging-based interference power constraint: Integrated design of the radio environment map and transmission power,

    K. Sato and T. Fujii, “Kriging-based interference power constraint: Integrated design of the radio environment map and transmission power,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2017

    2017

  7. [13]

    Aerial spectrum surveying: Radio map estimation with autonomous UA Vs,

    D. Romero, R. Shrestha, Y . Teganya, and S. P. Chepuri, “Aerial spectrum surveying: Radio map estimation with autonomous UA Vs,” in2020 IEEE 30th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  8. [14]

    Propagation map reconstruction via interpolation assisted matrix completion,

    H. Sun and J. Chen, “Propagation map reconstruction via interpolation assisted matrix completion,” IEEE transactions on signal processing , vol. 70, pp. 6154–6169, 2022

    2022

  9. [15]

    Reducing the effects of motion artifacts in fmri: A structured matrix completion approach,

    A. Balachandrasekaran, A. L. Cohen, O. Afacan, S. K. Warfield, and A. Gholipour, “Reducing the effects of motion artifacts in fmri: A structured matrix completion approach,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 172–185, 2021

    2021

  10. [16]

    Cognitive radio spectrum prediction using dictionary learning,

    S.-J. Kim and G. B. Giannakis, “Cognitive radio spectrum prediction using dictionary learning,” in 2013 IEEE Global Communications Con- ference (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 2013, pp. 3206–3211. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 13

    2013

  11. [17]

    Spatial signal strength predic- tion using 3d maps and deep learning,

    E. Krijestorac, S. Hanna, and D. Cabric, “Spatial signal strength predic- tion using 3d maps and deep learning,” in ICC 2021-IEEE international conference on communications . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  12. [18]

    Deep completion autoencoders for ra- dio map estimation,

    Y . Teganya and D. Romero, “Deep completion autoencoders for ra- dio map estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1710–1724, 2021

    2021

  13. [19]

    Machine learning-based urban canyon path loss prediction using 28 ghz manhattan measurements,

    A. Gupta, J. Du, D. Chizhik, R. A. Valenzuela, and M. Sellathurai, “Machine learning-based urban canyon path loss prediction using 28 ghz manhattan measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 4096–4111, 2022

    2022

  14. [20]

    Transformer- based neural surrogate for link-level path loss prediction from variable- sized maps,

    T. M. Hehn, T. Orekondy, O. Shental, A. Behboodi, J. Bucheli, A. Doshi, J. Namgoong, T. Yoo, A. Sampath, and J. B. Soriaga, “Transformer- based neural surrogate for link-level path loss prediction from variable- sized maps,” in GLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communications Con...

    2023

  15. [21]

    Radiounet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,

    R. Levie, C ¸ . Yapar, G. Kutyniok, and G. Caire, “Radiounet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4001–4015, 2021

    2021

  16. [22]

    A scalable and generalizable pathloss map prediction,

    J.-H. Lee and A. F. Molisch, “A scalable and generalizable pathloss map prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 2024

    2024

  17. [23]

    Da-cgan: A framework for indoor radio design using a dimension-aware conditional generative adversarial network,

    C.-H. Liu, H. Chang, and T. Park, “Da-cgan: A framework for indoor radio design using a dimension-aware conditional generative adversarial network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , 2020, pp. 498–499

    2020

  18. [24]

    Radio map estimation using a generative adversarial network and related business aspects,

    S. K. Vankayala, S. Kumar, I. Roy, D. Thirumulanathan, S. Yoon, and I. S. Kanakaraj, “Radio map estimation using a generative adversarial network and related business aspects,” in 2021 24th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC) . IEEE, 2...

    2021

  19. [25]

    Access-point centered window- based radio-map generation network,

    W.-Y . Kim, S.-H. Tae, and D.-H. Seo, “Access-point centered window- based radio-map generation network,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 18, p. 6107, 2021

    2021

  20. [26]

    RME-GAN: a learning frame- work for radio map estimation based on conditional generative adver- sarial network,

    S. Zhang, A. Wijesinghe, and Z. Ding, “RME-GAN: a learning frame- work for radio map estimation based on conditional generative adver- sarial network,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2023

    2023

  21. [27]

    IRGAN: CGAN-based indoor radio map prediction,

    C. T. Cisse, O. Baala, V . Guillet, F. Spies, and A. Caminada, “IRGAN: CGAN-based indoor radio map prediction,” in 2023 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–9

    2023

  22. [28]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 6840– 6851, 2020

    2020

  23. [29]

    High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2022, pp. 10 684–10 695

    2022

  24. [30]

    Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models,

    J. Ho, W. Chan, C. Saharia, J. Whang, R. Gao, A. Gritsenko, D. P. Kingma, B. Poole, M. Norouzi, D. J. Fleet et al. , “Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303, 2022

    arXiv

  25. [31]

    Dif- fwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis,

    Z. Kong, W. Ping, J. Huang, K. Zhao, and B. Catanzaro, “Dif- fwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09761, 2020

    2009 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Csdi: Conditional score- based diffusion models for probabilistic time series imputation,

    Y . Tashiro, J. Song, Y . Song, and S. Ermon, “Csdi: Conditional score- based diffusion models for probabilistic time series imputation,” Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 24 804– 24 816, 2021

    2021

  27. [33]

    Generative time series forecasting with diffusion, denoise, and disentanglement,

    Y . Li, X. Lu, Y . Wang, and D. Dou, “Generative time series forecasting with diffusion, denoise, and disentanglement,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 23 009–23 022, 2022

    2022

  28. [34]

    A survey on diffusion models for time series and spatio-temporal data,

    Y . Yang, M. Jin, H. Wen, C. Zhang, Y . Liang, L. Ma, Y . Wang, C. Liu, B. Yang, Z. Xu et al. , “A survey on diffusion models for time series and spatio-temporal data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.18886 , 2024

    2024

  29. [35]

    Dyffusion: A dynamics-informed diffusion model for spatiotemporal forecasting,

    S. R ¨uhling Cachay, B. Zhao, H. Joren, and R. Yu, “Dyffusion: A dynamics-informed diffusion model for spatiotemporal forecasting,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  30. [36]

    Score-based generative models for robust channel estimation,

    M. Arvinte and J. I. Tamir, “Score-based generative models for robust channel estimation,” in 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Net- working Conference (WCNC) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 453–458

    2022

  31. [37]

    CDDM: Channel denoising diffusion models for wireless communications,

    T. Wu, Z. Chen, D. He, L. Qian, Y . Xu, M. Tao, and W. Zhang, “CDDM: Channel denoising diffusion models for wireless communications,” in GLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference . IEEE, 2023, pp. 7429–7434

    2023

  32. [38]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for hardware-impaired communication systems: Towards wire- less generative ai,

    M. Letafati, S. Ali, and M. Latva-aho, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for hardware-impaired communication systems: Towards wire- less generative ai,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19460 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Generative AI-Based Probabilistic Constellation Shaping With Diffusion Models,

    Letafati, Mehdi and Ali, Samad and Latva-aho, Matti, “Generative AI-Based Probabilistic Constellation Shaping With Diffusion Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09349 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Learning end-to-end channel coding with diffusion models,

    M. Kim, R. Fritschek, and R. F. Schaefer, “Learning end-to-end channel coding with diffusion models,” in WSA & SCC 2023; 26th International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas and 13th Conference on Systems, Communications, and Coding . VDE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  35. [41]

    Deep generative model and its applications in efficient wireless network management: A tutorial and case study,

    Y . Liu, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, D. I. Kim, and A. Jamalipour, “Deep generative model and its applications in efficient wireless network management: A tutorial and case study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17114, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  36. [42]

    A hybrid wireless image transmission scheme with diffusion,

    X. Niu, X. Wang, D. G ¨und¨uz, B. Bai, W. Chen, and G. Zhou, “A hybrid wireless image transmission scheme with diffusion,” in 2023 IEEE 24th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPA WC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 86–90

    2023

  37. [43]

    High perceptual quality wireless image delivery with denoising diffusion models,

    S. F. Yilmaz, X. Niu, B. Bai, W. Han, L. Deng, and D. Gunduz, “High perceptual quality wireless image delivery with denoising diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15889 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Commin: Semantic image communications as an inverse problem with inn-guided diffusion models,

    J. Chen, D. You, D. G ¨und¨uz, and P. L. Dragotti, “Commin: Semantic image communications as an inverse problem with inn-guided diffusion models,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 6675–6679

    2024

  39. [45]

    Rm-gen: Conditional diffusion model-based radio map generation for wireless networks,

    X. Luo, L. Zhizhen, Z. Peng, X. Dongkuan, and Y . Liu, “Rm-gen: Conditional diffusion model-based radio map generation for wireless networks,” in 2024 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 543–548

    2024

  40. [46]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international con- ference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18 ...

    2015

  41. [49]

    Conditional generative adversarial nets,

    M. Mirza and S. Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784 , 2014

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,

    P. Isola, J.-Y . Zhu, T. Zhou, and A. A. Efros, “Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017, pp. 1125– 1134

    2017

  43. [51]

    Generative adversarial networks: An overview,

    A. Creswell, T. White, V . Dumoulin, K. Arulkumaran, B. Sengupta, and A. A. Bharath, “Generative adversarial networks: An overview,” IEEE signal processing magazine , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.