Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 27 references

Synchronization transitions in adaptive simplicial complexes with cooperative and competitive dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cooperative and competitive adaptation in higher-order (triangular) interactions controls whether a network of Kuramoto oscillators synchronizes explosively or continuously, and strong enough three-body coupling alone can synchronize a…

desk verdict A numerically interesting study of adaptive higher-order synchronization whose analytical 'proof' analyzes a different, non-adaptive model and should be fixed or removed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01044 v1 pith:QGHM2QJZ submitted 2024-12-02 nlin.AO physics.soc-ph

S. Nirmala Jenifer , Dibakar Ghosh , Paulsamy Muruganandam This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.AOphysics.soc-ph MSC 05C8234C1534D06 PACS 05.45.Xt89.75.Fb
keywords adaptivenetworkssimplicialcomplexeshigher-orderinteractionsexplosivesynchronizationKuramotooscillatorscooperativeandcompetitiveadaptationphasetransitionsorderparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether adding three-body (simplicial) interactions to an adaptive network of Kuramoto oscillators changes how the network synchronizes, and whether the type of adaptation—cooperative or competitive—controls the order of the transition. It claims that purely competitive adaptation yields continuous (second-order) transitions and cluster formation, whereas cooperative adaptation produces explosive (first-order) transitions with hysteresis, and that a mix of the two can produce sharp transitions without backward desynchronization. The strongest claim: with sufficiently strong higher-order coupling, oscillators synchronize even with no pairwise coupling at all, which matters because pairwise interactions have usually been treated as necessary for synchronization in static networks. A mean-field calculation on globally coupled networks supports the numerical phase-transition picture.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the adaptive simplicial-complex Kuramoto model in Eq. (1), where pairwise and three-body couplings are modulated by local order parameters: cooperative nodes use $\alpha_i = r_i$, $\beta_i = r_i$; competitive nodes use $\alpha_i = 1-r_i$, $\beta_i = 1-r_i$. The analytical device is the Ott-Antonsen ansatz on a globally coupled network, replacing local order parameters with the global $R$, yielding the fixed-point equation $R = \frac{\sigma_1 \alpha R}{2}(1-R^2) + \frac{\sigma_2 \beta R^3}{2}(1-R^2)$. The number of branches of this equation in $R\in[0,1]$ is the fingerprint of transition type: two branches mean hysteresis and explosive synchronization, one branch means a continuous transition.

What would settle it

Run the same adaptive dynamics (Eq. (1)) on an Erdős-Rényi network with N=200, mean degree K=20, sigma_2=0.3, all links and triangles competitive, and record R versus sigma_1 with small adiabatic steps: if R shows a discontinuous jump or hysteresis rather than a continuous curve, the claim that competitive adaptation always yields second-order transitions is false. Alternatively, for global coupling, solve the fixed-point equation with a nonzero Lorentzian width and check whether the two-branch hysteretic solution persists; if it disappears, the analytical identification of hysteresis with cooperative adaptation is not robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the sign of the adaptation feedback, not just the coupling strength, sets the synchronization transition type. In the model, each node's pairwise and three-body couplings are multiplied by a local order parameter (cooperative, $\alpha_i = r_i$, $\beta_i = r_i$) or by its complement (competitive, $\alpha_i = 1-r_i$, $\beta_i = 1-r_i$). Because cooperative links strengthen as coherence grows, they create a self-reinforcing loop that yields explosive transitions with hysteresis; competitive links weaken as coherence grows, preventing the jump and producing continuous transitions. Higher-order triangle couplings act as an extra synchronizing drive: at fixed $\sigma_1$, increasing $\sigma_2$ shifts backward critical points to lower $\sigma_1$, and for large enough $\sigma_2$ the system remains synchronized even at $\sigma_1 = 0$ or below, so pairwise interactions are not strictly required. The Ott-Antonsen mean-field analysis reproduces this as two branches for $R$ under cooperative adaptation (hysteresis) and one branch under competitive adaptation (no hysteresis).

Load-bearing premise

The analytical verification assumes the network is globally coupled and replaces every oscillator's local order parameter with the global order parameter; if local adaptation on sparse networks behaves differently, the predicted transition type could be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If cooperative adaptation is present, increasing the higher-order coupling strength $\sigma_2$ widens the hysteresis loop and shifts the backward desynchronization point to lower $\sigma_1$.
  • If all couplings adapt competitively, the system cannot undergo an explosive transition; it synchronizes continuously, if at all, and tends to form a cluster rather than jumping to full coherence.
  • Sufficiently strong three-body coupling can synchronize a static network with $\sigma_1 = 0$, so pairwise coupling is not necessary for synchronization in adaptive higher-order networks.
  • Denser networks amplify the effect of adaptation: cooperative higher-order interactions widen hysteresis, while competitive higher-order interactions suppress explosive transitions.
  • The qualitative transition type is robust to changing the number of nodes, although critical couplings and hysteresis widths shift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests a control recipe: adding a small fraction of competitive nodes to an otherwise cooperative adaptive network should suppress explosive jumps, which could be tested in engineered oscillator arrays or in models of power-grid synchronization.
  • The cluster formation seen under pure competition implies that competitive adaptation may be a generic route to chimera-like or multi-cluster states; a natural extension is to compute the cluster order parameter as a function of $\sigma_2$, which the paper does not quantify.
  • The analytical fixed-point equation is derived under a Lorentzian frequency distribution with unspecified width; testing whether the two-branch (hysteretic) solution survives as that width is varied would clarify the robustness of the explosive-transition claim.
  • Because the local order parameter in Eq. (2) divides by node degree, zero-degree nodes are undefined, so the analysis implicitly assumes every node has at least one pairwise link; a degree-heterogeneous or directed extension could change the transition picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies an adaptive Kuramoto model on simplicial complexes in which each node's pairwise and three-body coupling strengths are modulated by its local order parameter r_i: nodes are 'cooperative' when the coupling scales with r_i and 'competitive' when it scales with 1 - r_i. Four combinations of pairwise and higher-order adaptation are simulated on Erdős-Rényi networks of N=200 oscillators, reporting (i) explosive, hysteretic transitions when cooperative adaptation dominates, (ii) continuous transitions when competitive adaptation dominates, and (iii) synchronization in the absence of pairwise interactions when higher-order coupling is sufficiently strong. The paper also studies the effect of system size and mean degree, and provides a mean-field Ott-Antonsen analysis for a globally coupled version of the model, claiming that the presence or absence of two solution branches in Eq. (12) proves the first-order versus second-order distinction.

Significance. If the reported phenomenology is robust, the paper contributes a useful demonstration that the type of synchronization transition can be controlled by mixing cooperative and competitive adaptive rules in higher-order networks. The clean separation of four adaptation scenarios and the systematic variation of σ1 and σ2 are valuable, and the claim that higher-order adaptive coupling can synchronize a static network without pairwise interactions is a concrete, falsifiable prediction that goes beyond existing pairwise adaptive-network studies. The paper also ships a reasonably complete description of the numerical protocol, which aids reproducibility. The main weakness is that the analytical verification in Section IV does not currently establish the central dichotomy, for reasons detailed below; the empirical findings therefore stand on finite-N adiabatic sweeps without ensemble averaging.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (4) and Fig. 8] The analytical verification of the cooperative case sets α = β = 1, not α = β = R. The text explicitly says, 'we first consider the case in which the nodes in both links and triangles adapt cooperatively by setting α = β = 1,' whereas the model definition immediately before Eq. (4) states that cooperative adaptation corresponds to α = β = R. Equation (12) with α = β = 1 is therefore the static higher-order Kuramoto model, not the adaptive cooperative model simulated in Figs. 1–3. This mismatch means the analytical result cannot verify the claim that cooperative adaptation induces explosive synchronization; the authors must either derive Eq. (12) with α = β = R or clearly state that they are analyzing a different, non-adaptive limit.
  2. [Section IV, Eqs. (9)–(12)] The Lorentzian frequency width Δ is introduced in Eq. (9) but never assigned a value and disappears from the fixed-point equation Eq. (12). Evaluating Eq. (11) at γ(ω0 - iΔ, t) produces a term -Δγ, which should appear in the real-part fixed-point condition; Eq. (12) contains no such term. As written, Eq. (12) is independent of Δ, which is inconsistent with the stated Lorentzian distribution and with the standard Ott-Antonsen reduction, where the width controls the decay of the incoherent state. Please specify Δ and re-derive Eq. (12) including the -Δγ contribution, or explain explicitly if a Δ → 0 limit is being taken.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (12) and Fig. 8] The inference of hysteresis from the existence of two solution branches of Eq. (12) is not valid without stability analysis. Multiple fixed points do not imply bistability of stable states; one branch may be unstable, and a first-order transition requires coexisting stable incoherent and stable coherent states. Moreover, Eq. (12) is obtained after dividing by R, so the R = 0 incoherent solution is not examined within the same equation. Please provide a linear stability analysis of the fixed points of Eq. (11), or direct time integration of Eq. (4) with and without adiabatic sweeps, to demonstrate which branches are attracting.
  4. [Section III, Figs. 1–4] The central empirical classification into first-order and second-order transitions rests on single adiabatic forward/backward sweeps with no reported ensemble averaging or error bars. For finite N = 200, transition points and even the presence of hysteresis can vary across Erdős-Rényi realizations. The authors should state the number of realizations, show error bars or distributions of R, and ideally report the fraction of realizations that exhibit a discontinuous jump, to support the claimed transition-type dichotomy.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II] There is a typo in the definitions of f1 and f2: the text reads 'The opposite situation has occurred when f1 = 0 and f2 = 1' twice, but the second occurrence should presumably be f1 = 1 and f2 = 0. Also, the index range for β_i, written as 'i = N f1 + 1, N f2 + 2, . . . , N', appears to contain a typo and should likely be 'i = N f2 + 1, . . . , N'.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (2)] The local order parameter r_i in Eq. (2) divides by the degree k_i, so r_i is undefined for any oscillator with k_i = 0. The paper does not state that such nodes are absent from the generated Erdős-Rényi networks; for N = 200 and mean degree 20 this is highly likely, but an explicit statement or a convention for isolated nodes would make the model well-posed for arbitrary networks.
  3. [Section III, numerical details] The manuscript does not report the numerical integration method, time step, transient time, or number of steps used for the adiabatic sweeps. Please add these details so that the simulations can be reproduced exactly.
  4. [Section III.F] The phrase 'It is proven that cooperative adaptation is needed for the explosive transition' overstates the analytical support, since Section IV treats a globally coupled mean-field model and, for the cooperative case, actually sets α = β = 1. A more accurate wording would be 'the numerical results suggest' or 'the mean-field analysis supports'.
  5. [Section IV, Fig. 8] In the caption, 'The markers star depict' should be 'star markers depict', and the caption does not describe what the different panels (a)–(d) correspond to beyond the σ2 values; please clarify the relation between panels and the two adaptation cases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central synchronization-transition claims rest on direct numerical simulation of the full model, not on fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's main claims—cooperative adaptation gives first-order/explosive synchronization, competitive adaptation gives second-order transitions, and strong higher-order coupling can synchronize even without pairwise coupling—are established by direct integration of Eq. (1) on Erdős–Rényi networks (Figs. 1–4). No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction. The adaptive rules α_i = r_i and β_i = 1 − r_i are model definitions, and the observed transition types are genuine dynamical consequences: positive feedback does not guarantee explosive synchronization in every network setting, so the numerical results carry independent content. Section IV derives Eq. (12) via the Ott–Antonsen ansatz and compares branch structure with numerical solutions of Eq. (5), which is a separate consistency check rather than a circular restatement. Two flaws in that analytical section—replacing local order parameters by the global order parameter and setting α = β = 1 for the 'cooperative' case despite the stated definition α = β = R—are correctness or model-consistency gaps, not circular reductions, because the analytic section is not the source of the central empirical findings. The self-citations (Refs. 23 and 27) are contextual and non-load-bearing: the relevant numerical comparisons are reproduced within the present paper (Fig. 8). No self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation chain forces the claimed results.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on an explicit dynamical model (Eq. 1) with chosen adaptation rules; no free parameters are fitted to data. The main load-bearing assumptions are (i) the Ott-Antonsen reduction is valid for the higher-order adaptive system, (ii) local order parameters can be replaced by the global order parameter in the mean-field limit, (iii) the ER networks have no isolated nodes, and (iv) the qualitative conclusions transfer from Lorentzian to uniform frequency distributions.

free parameters (1)
  • Lorentzian width Delta = not stated (implicitly 1 in Eq. 12)
    The fixed-point condition Eq. (12) should contain a factor Delta from the Lorentzian distribution (Eq. 9), but it is absent; the analytical curves in Fig. 8 therefore depend on an unspecified parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Ott-Antonsen ansatz holds for the adaptive simplicial Kuramoto model
    Section IV assumes the single-harmonic OA manifold (Eq. 8) without justification for the higher-order coupling term; the ansatz is valid for standard Kuramoto with Lorentzian noise, but not proven here.
  • domain assumption Local order parameter r_i can be replaced by the global order parameter R in the mean-field limit
    In Section IV, alpha and beta are set to R or 1-R, substituting global R for each node's local r_i; on ER networks with heterogeneous degrees this replacement is not derived.
  • domain assumption All nodes have at least one pairwise neighbor so that r_i in Eq. (2) is well-defined
    The local order parameter divides by degree k_i; the paper does not state that the ER networks have no isolated nodes.
  • domain assumption The Lorentzian distribution with width Delta is equivalent to the uniform [-1,1] distribution used in numerics for qualitative conclusions
    Numerical results use random frequencies in [-1,1], while the analytical section uses a Lorentzian; the paper does not discuss whether the transition types transfer across distributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Synchronization transitions in adaptive simplicial complexes with cooperative and competitive dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QGHM2QJZ

@misc{pith2026241201044,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Synchronization transitions in adaptive simplicial complexes with cooperative and competitive dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QGHM2QJZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01044}
}
read the original abstract

Adaptive network is a powerful presentation to describe different real-world phenomena. However, current models often neglect higher-order interactions (beyond pairwise interactions) and diverse adaptation types (cooperative and competitive) commonly observed in systems like the human brain and social networks. This work addresses this gap by incorporating these factors into a model that explores their impact on collective properties like synchronization. Through simplified network representations, we investigate how the simultaneous presence of cooperative and competitive adaptations influences phase transitions. Our findings reveal a transition from first-order to second-order synchronization as the strength of higher-order interactions increases under competitive adaptation. We also demonstrate the possibility of synchronization even without pairwise interactions, provided there is strong enough higher-order coupling. When only competitive adaptations are present, the system exhibits second-order-like phase transitions and clustering. Conversely, with a combination of cooperative and competitive adaptations, the system undergoes a first-order-like phase transition, characterized by a sharp transition to the synchronized state without reverting to an incoherent state during backward transitions. The specific nature of these second-order-like transitions varies depending on the coupling strengths and mean degrees. With our model, we can control not only when the system synchronizes but also the way the system goes to synchronization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01044 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Variation of the global order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Global order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The position of phases on unit circle for the different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Plots showing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The plots of the global order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Battiston , author G

    author author F. Battiston , author G. Cencetti , author I. Iacopini , author V. Latora , author M. Lucas , author A. Patania , author J.-G. \ Young ,\ and\ author G. Petri ,\ title title Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 874 ,\ pages 1--92 ( ...

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004

  2. [2]

    Battiston , author E

    author author F. Battiston , author E. Amico , author A. Barrat , author G. Bianconi , author G. Ferraz de Arruda , author B. Franceschiello , author I. Iacopini , author S. K \'e fi , author V. Latora , author Y. Moreno , et al. ,\ title title The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01371-4 journ...

    doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01371-4

  3. [3]

    Majhi , author M

    author author S. Majhi , author M. Perc ,\ and\ author D. Ghosh ,\ title title Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review , \ https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0043 journal journal J. R. Soc. Interface \ volume 19 ,\ pages 20220043 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Iacopini , author G

    author author I. Iacopini , author G. Petri , author A. Barrat ,\ and\ author V. Latora ,\ title title Simplicial models of social contagion , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10431-6 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1--9 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10431-6

  5. [5]

    Boccaletti , author V

    author author S. Boccaletti , author V. Latora , author Y. Moreno , author M. Chavez ,\ and\ author D.-U. \ Hwang ,\ title title Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 424 ,\ pages 175--308 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 2005

  6. [6]

    Sawicki , author R

    author author J. Sawicki , author R. Berner , author S. A. \ Loos , author M. Anvari , author R. Bader , author W. Barfuss , author N. Botta , author N. Brede , author I. Franovi \'c , author D. J. \ Gauthier , et al. ,\ title title Perspectives on adaptive dynamical systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147231 journal journal Chaos \ volume 33 ,\ pages ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0147231

  7. [7]

    Berner , author T

    author author R. Berner , author T. Gross , author C. Kuehn , author J. Kurths ,\ and\ author S. Yanchuk ,\ title title Adaptive dynamical networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.08.001 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 1031 ,\ pages 1--59 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.08.001 2023

  8. [8]

    author author D. V. \ Kasatkin , author S. Yanchuk , author E. Sch\"oll ,\ and\ author V. I. \ Nekorkin ,\ title title Self-organized emergence of multilayer structure and chimera states in dynamical networks with adaptive couplings , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.062211 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 96 ,\ pages 062211 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.96.062211

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Berner , author E

    author author R. Berner , author E. Scholl ,\ and\ author S. Yanchuk ,\ title title Multiclusters in networks of adaptively coupled phase oscillators , \ https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1210150 journal journal SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 2227--2266 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Berner , author S

    author author R. Berner , author S. Vock , author E. Sch\"oll ,\ and\ author S. Yanchuk ,\ title title Desynchronization transitions in adaptive networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.028301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 126 ,\ pages 028301 ( year 202...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author X. S. \ Liang ,\ title title Measuring the importance of individual units in producing the collective behavior of a complex network , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055051 journal journal Chaos \ volume 31 ,\ pages 093123 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author A. T. \ Winfree ,\ title title Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(67)90051-3 journal journal J. Theor. Biol. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 15--42 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author Y. Kuramoto ,\ title title Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear oscillators , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0013365 booktitle International symposium on mathematical problems in theoretical physics \ ( organization Springer ,\ year 1975 )\ pp...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author F. A. \ Rodrigues , author T. K. D. \ Peron , author P. Ji ,\ and\ author J. Kurths ,\ title title The K uramoto model in complex networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.008 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 610 ,\ pages 1--98 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Arenas , author A

    author author A. Arenas , author A. D \' az-Guilera , author J. Kurths , author Y. Moreno ,\ and\ author C. Zhou ,\ title title Synchronization in complex networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.002 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 469 ,\ pages 93--153 ( year...

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    G\'omez-Garde\ nes , author Y

    author author J. G\'omez-Garde\ nes , author Y. Moreno ,\ and\ author A. Arenas ,\ title title Paths to synchronization on complex networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.034101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 034101 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    G\'omez-Garde\ nes , author S

    author author J. G\'omez-Garde\ nes , author S. G\'omez , author A. Arenas ,\ and\ author Y. Moreno ,\ title title Explosive synchronization transitions in scale-free networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.128701 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 106 ,\ p...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Zhang , author X

    author author X. Zhang , author X. Hu , author J. Kurths ,\ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Explosive synchronization in a general complex network , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.010802 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 88 ,\ pages 010802 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    Zhang , author S

    author author X. Zhang , author S. Boccaletti , author S. Guan ,\ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Explosive synchronization in adaptive and multilayer networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.038701 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 038701 ( ...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Frolov , author S

    author author N. Frolov , author S. Rakshit , author V. Maksimenko , author D. Kirsanov , author D. Ghosh ,\ and\ author A. Hramov ,\ title title Coexistence of interdependence and competition in adaptive multilayer network , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110955 journ...

  13. [21]

    Frolov \ and\ author A

    author author N. Frolov \ and\ author A. Hramov ,\ title title Extreme synchronization events in a Kuramoto model: The interplay between resource constraints and explosive transitions , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055156 journal journal Chaos \ volume 31 ,\ pages 063103 ( yea...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Frolov \ and\ author A

    author author N. Frolov \ and\ author A. Hramov ,\ title title Self-organized bistability on scale-free networks , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044301 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 106 ,\ pages 044301 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author M. S. \ Anwar \ and\ author D. Ghosh ,\ title title Synchronization in temporal simplicial complexes , \ https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1525909 journal journal SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2054--2081 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    Moyal , author P

    author author B. Moyal , author P. Rajwani , author S. Dutta ,\ and\ author S. Jalan ,\ title title Rotating clusters in phase-lagged kuramoto oscillators with higher-order interactions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.034211 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 109 ,...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Ott \ and\ author T

    author author E. Ott \ and\ author T. M. \ Antonsen ,\ title title Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2930766 journal journal Chaos \ volume 18 ,\ pages 037113 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Sharma , author P

    author author A. Sharma , author P. Rajwani ,\ and\ author S. Jalan ,\ title title Synchronization transitions in adaptive kuramoto--sakaguchi oscillators with higher-order interactions , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224001 journal journal Chaos \ volume 34 ,\ pages 081103 ( y...

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author S. N. \ Jenifer , author D. Ghosh ,\ and\ author P. Muruganandam ,\ title title Synchronizability in randomized weighted simplicial complexes , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.054302 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 109 ,\ pages 054302 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.