Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generative AI in Computing Education: Perspectives of Students and Instructors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.04309 v1 pith:QIXT6DYG submitted 2023-08-08 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords modelscomputingstudentseducationgenerativeinstructorstoolsresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative models are now capable of producing natural language text that is, in some cases, comparable in quality to the text produced by people. In the computing education context, these models are being used to generate code, code explanations, and programming exercises. The rapid adoption of these models has prompted multiple position papers and workshops which discuss the implications of these models for computing education, both positive and negative. This paper presents results from a series of semi-structured interviews with 12 students and 6 instructors about their awareness, experiences, and preferences regarding the use of tools powered by generative AI in computing classrooms. The results suggest that Generative AI (GAI) tools will play an increasingly significant role in computing education. However, students and instructors also raised numerous concerns about how these models should be integrated to best support the needs and learning goals of students. We also identified interesting tensions and alignments that emerged between how instructors and students prefer to engage with these models. We discuss these results and provide recommendations related to curriculum development, assessment methods, and pedagogical practice. As GAI tools become increasingly prevalent, it's important to understand educational stakeholders' preferences and values to ensure that these tools can be used for good and that potential harms can be mitigated.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Solving Visual Graph and Tree Based Data Structure Problems using Large Multimodal Models

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a newly generated benchmark, multimodal models solve up to 87.6% of visual tree problems and 56.2% of visual graph problems, undercutting the idea that diagrams make exam questions AI-proof.

  2. Designing for Learning with Generative AI is a Wicked Problem: An Illustrative Longitudinal Qualitative Case Series

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two semester-long student case studies show trade-offs between GenAI proficiency, ethics, and career confidence, suggesting that GenAI-integrated teaching should be evaluated and designed as a multi-goal 'wicked problem.'

Pith tools