Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 101 references

Absolute charge calibration of DRZ phosphor screens for relativistic electron bunches

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes absolute conversion efficiencies for all six DRZ phosphor screens, measured under identical conditions at 30 MeV, giving a unified reference for converting scintillator light into electron bunch charge.

desk verdict A solid, useful calibration paper that delivers the first complete DRZ-series table, with first-ever values for HR and FINE — just be clear it is a 30 MeV measurement and the energy dependence is not quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17059 v1 pith:QJRDXNOX submitted 2026-07-19 physics.acc-ph

Shuang Liu , Bing Zhou , Pengwei Huang , Tianliang Zhang , Bo Peng , Shengtai Wei , Zhiyuan Guo , Bo Guo
show 4 more authors
Fei Li Jianfei Hua Yang Wan Wei Lu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-ph PACS 29.27.Fh29.40.Mc
keywords DRZphosphorscreensabsolutecalibrationelectronbunchchargescintillationlightyieldlaserwakefieldaccelerationGd2O2S:TbLambertianemissionbeamdiagnostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Electron spectrometers for laser-plasma accelerators infer bunch charge from light emitted by DRZ phosphor screens, even though manufacturers specify these screens for X-rays, not electrons. This paper calibrates all six DRZ screen types under one identical experimental setup, measuring each screen's absolute conversion factor—photons emitted per steradian per picocoulomb of incident electrons at the dominant 543 nm green peak. The measured factors range from 12.7 × 10^9 photons/sr/pC for PI200 down to 1.5 × 10^9 for HR, with relative uncertainties around 5–7%. The response is linear from 5 to 50 pC, and the emission follows a Lambertian (cosine) angular distribution, so a single calibration number per screen is meaningful. A sympathetic reader would take this as the first complete, internally consistent reference table for the DRZ series and an anchor for comparing the scattered numbers in earlier literature.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the absolute fluorescence efficiency, defined as the slope of integrated photon yield (photons/sr) against beam charge measured independently by a beam position monitor. Two supporting characterizations carry the accuracy: spectral isolation of the 543 nm emission band with a band-pass filter so the CCD quantum efficiency is applied to a known wavelength, and a Lambertian angular-distribution correction verified with three simultaneous cameras so the off-axis collection geometry maps to total hemispherical emission. Together these produce a single conversion factor per screen, in photons/sr/pC.

What would settle it

Measure the absolute light yield of one DRZ screen (e.g., PI200) at 10 MeV and at 100 MeV using the same imaging chain and charge reference; if the photons/sr/pC slope changes by more than the reported ~6% uncertainty, the single-energy table cannot be applied directly to broadband LWFA spectra without an energy-dependent correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors measured the emission spectra of DRZ screens, identified the dominant green line at 543 nm together with secondary bands at 489 and 586 nm, and calibrated the absolute light yield of that line for all six DRZ screen types. Using 30 MeV electron bunches with charge set by a beam position monitor calibrated against a Faraday cup, they varied the bunch charge from 5 to 50 pC and recorded screen luminescence through a band-pass filter centered at 546 nm. The slope of the linear fit of detected photons per steradian versus bunch charge defines the absolute calibration factor for each screen: PI200 = 12.7, High = 10.4, Plus = 6.4, Standard = 4.5, Fine = 2.7, and HR = 1.5 (units of 10^9

Load-bearing premise

The calibration is carried out at one electron energy, about 30 MeV, yet the paper presents it as the reference for laser-plasma beams that have a broad energy spread, without measuring or modeling how scintillation yield per electron varies with energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any of the six DRZ screens, a measured CCD signal can be converted directly to electron bunch charge using the tabulated photons/sr/pC values, provided the optical geometry and camera efficiency are known.
  • Because the response is linear from 5 to 50 pC, one calibration constant suffices for typical single-shot LWFA charge measurements in that range.
  • The Lambertian emission result means users can correct for observation angle with a simple cosine factor, independent of screen type.
  • The 543 nm-specific calibration, combined with the measured spectrum, lets users who do or do not filter the secondary peaks propagate the associated systematic shift.
  • The agreement with selected earlier measurements of DRZ High and PI200 supports cross-facility comparison with quantified uncertainty.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors pin the calibration to a single electron energy (about 30 MeV); since LWFA bunches span from a few MeV to hundreds of MeV and stopping power varies strongly in that range, the table likely needs an energy-dependent correction or a stated operating range before it is applied blindly to broadband spectra.
  • The discrepancy with a recent full-spectrum PI200 value (20.4 vs 12.7 × 10^9 photons/sr/pC) suggests the spectral window is a dominant systematic; a natural extension is to publish the full spectral efficiency function so cameras with arbitrary spectral response can integrate it.
  • A testable extension is to repeat the calibration at a second beam energy, or with a series of screens of different phosphor thicknesses, to see whether the yield scales with stopping power; if it does, one could build an energy-dependent response model for LWFA spectrometers.
  • The same methodology—spectral isolation, angular correction, and independent charge metrology—could be applied to other scintillator screen families to settle the known factor-of-two discrepancies in the literature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an absolute calibration of six DRZ Gd2O2S:Tb scintillator screens (PI200, High, Plus, Standard, Fine, HR) in units of emitted photons per steradian per picocoulomb at the 543 nm emission peak. The calibration uses the 30 MeV, 1% energy-spread electron beam at the Tsinghua TTX facility, with bunch charge measured by a BPM calibrated against a Faraday cup. The authors measure each screen's emission spectrum, characterize the angular emission distribution as Lambertian, and fit the integrated CCD signal versus charge over 5–50 pC to obtain conversion efficiencies between 1.5 and 12.7 × 10^9 photons/sr/pC with quoted relative errors of 4.9–6.6%. They compare these values with previous DRZ calibrations and position the work as a unified calibration reference for laser wakefield accelerator (LWFA) diagnostics.

Significance. If the calibration is reproducible, the table of absolute efficiencies for the full DRZ series is a useful and timely community resource for quantitative LWFA electron spectroscopy. The measurement chain is sensible: an independent BPM charge reference, spectral filtering to isolate the dominant 543 nm line, a three-angle Lambertian check, and a quadrature error budget. The agreement with the values of Schwinkendorf et al. for the High screen is encouraging. The main weaknesses are that the absolute photon-count conversion is not documented in a reproducible way and that the data are taken at a single electron energy while the stated target application is broadband LWFA beams; neither issue invalidates the 30 MeV measurement but both need to be addressed before the paper can serve as the definitive reference it claims to be.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III C, Sec. III D] The paper never explicitly shows how the CCD counts are converted into an absolute number of photons per steradian. A formula such as N_photons = (ADU signal)/(G · T_opt(λ) · QE(λ) · Ω · ND_attenuation) with the individual measured or manufacturer-supplied values is needed. Without this, Table I cannot be reproduced or audited, and the claim of absolute calibration is not verifiable. The 5% optical-path uncertainty is not a substitute for the nominal calibration chain.
  2. [Sec. II and abstract] The calibration is performed at a single electron energy, ~30 MeV, but the abstract and introduction frame the result as a general reference for LWFA beams, which are explicitly described as having broad energy spread from several MeV to hundreds of MeV. The scintillation yield per pC depends on electron energy through dE/dx and the phosphor layer thickness relative to the electron range, yet neither a measurement at other energies nor a model (e.g., a stopping-power or Monte Carlo estimate) is provided. The error budget in Sec. III D contains no term for this energy dependence. Applying Table I to a broad LWFA spectrum therefore carries an unquantified systematic error that may exceed the quoted ~5–7% for low-energy spectral components. Either add an energy-dependence measurement/model or explicitly restrict the claims to ~30 MeV beams.
  3. [Sec. III D, Table I] The text states that the total uncertainty is obtained by combining three independent components in quadrature: 2% beam charge jitter, 5% optical-system efficiency, and 2% image-signal statistics. These three values would give sqrt(2^2 + 5^2 + 2^2) ≈ 5.7% for every screen, but Table I reports errors ranging from 4.9% to 6.6%. Either the individual components are not the fixed values quoted, or the table and text are inconsistent. Please clarify how the per-screen errors were actually calculated and give the individual contributions for each screen.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III E, Table II] The text says the present values are in close agreement with Ref. 32, but Table II shows differences of about 18% for Standard (4.5 vs 5.5) and 12% for Plus (6.4 vs 7.3), while High differs by only 2%. Please quantify the agreement explicitly and discuss whether the differences are within the combined uncertainties.
  2. [General] Several references appear to have incomplete or implausible page ranges, e.g., Ref. 28 (Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 267 (2006)) and Ref. 29 (81, 267–1995). Please verify all bibliographic entries against the published versions.
  3. [Fig. 4] Figure 4 has no axis labels; the caption 'Absolute photons collected of all DRZ scintillation screen' is ungrammatical and does not specify units. Add labeled axes and make clear that the plotted signal is the fitted/measured photon yield per steradian.
  4. [Sec. III B] The text says the three CCD cameras were identical, but no detector model, lens, or observation geometry is specified beyond angles. A short description of the camera and solid-angle normalization would help reproducibility.
  5. [Sec. III A] The claim that the residual blue/yellow contributions were subtracted based on measured relative intensity is not accompanied by the subtraction equation or an uncertainty estimate. A brief derivation or reference to the routine would remove ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the DRZ calibration factors are direct measurements from an independent charge reference and an explicitly characterized optical chain.

full rationale

The paper reports an absolute calibration of DRZ phosphor screens. The derivation chain is a standard, self-contained measurement: the incident bunch charge is measured with a BPM calibrated by a Faraday cup (Sec. II), the emitted light is collected through a characterized optical system with stated component uncertainties (Sec. III D), and the absolute calibration factors in Table I are obtained as the slopes of linear fits of measured photons per steradian versus BPM charge (Sec. III C). There is no fitted parameter that is later renamed as a prediction, no quantity defined in terms of the target result, and no load-bearing self-citation: the cited prior calibrations (Refs. 31-33) are used only for comparison in Table II, not as inputs, and the cited TTX platform description (Ref. 34) merely describes the accelerator. Agreement with Ref. 32 is independent corroboration, not an input constraint. The only substantive caveat is the single 30 MeV calibration energy relative to the stated motivation of broadband LWFA beams; this is an external validity limitation regarding energy dependence of scintillation yield, not a circularity, because the measured calibration factors are direct empirical outputs for the stated conditions. No circular step can be exhibited, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The six Table I efficiencies are the measured output; the load-bearing inputs are the unstated optical-efficiency product, the spectral-correction fraction, and the transfer of a 30 MeV single-energy measurement to broadband LWFA beams. The Lambertian and linearity assumptions are checked (three angles; 5-50 pC) but only over the tested range.

free parameters (3)
  • Optical collection/detection efficiency (mirror reflectivity x window x lens x ND filter x CCD quantum efficiency)
    Absolute photons/sr/pC values scale inversely with this product; only its 5% quadrature uncertainty is given (Sec. III D), never its value, so the absolute scale cannot be audited or reproduced from the text.
  • Residual blue/yellow spectral subtraction factor
    The bandpass (546 +/- 40 nm) retains a 'small fraction' of 489/586 nm light that is subtracted using the measured spectrum (Sec. III A); the numeric factor is not stated, preventing a cross-check against Chiang et al.'s full-spectrum PI200 value (20.4 vs 12.7).
  • Fit slope efficiencies (Table I, six values) = 1.5-12.7 x 10^9 photons/sr/pC
    These are the reported outputs of linear least-squares fits over 5-50 pC (Fig. 4), not hidden inputs; listed for completeness since the central claim is these numbers, and they inherit the two unstated factors above.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 30 MeV electron beam from TTX has ~1% energy spread and 1 ps duration, so the measurement is effectively monoenergetic.
    Sec. II; if the true beam has significant energy spread, the calibration would average over energies.
  • domain assumption The BPM, calibrated against a Faraday cup, provides the true bunch charge to ~2%.
    Sec. II and III D; the Faraday-cup reference procedure is not described.
  • domain assumption DRZ emission is Lambertian, so total forward-hemisphere photons = pi x photons/sr at normal incidence.
    Sec. III B; verified at only three angles with a cosine fit.
  • domain assumption The scintillation yield is linear over 5-50 pC at 30 MeV.
    Sec. III C; linearity confirmed in this range, but saturation (Birks' law) observed by ref 30 at higher charge densities is not addressed.
  • ad hoc to paper Yield at 30 MeV represents the response relevant to broad-spectrum LWFA beams (several MeV to hundreds of MeV).
    The stated purpose (abstract/intro) is LWFA beam charge measurement; no energy-dependence measurement or model is provided.
  • domain assumption Manufacturer/measured transmission of the bandpass filter and CCD quantum efficiency are accurate.
    Sec. II/III D; the 5% optical uncertainty rests on these.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Absolute charge calibration of DRZ phosphor screens for relativistic electron bunches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QJRDXNOX

@misc{pith2026260717059,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Absolute charge calibration of DRZ phosphor screens for relativistic electron bunches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QJRDXNOX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17059}
}
read the original abstract

Laser-plasma accelerators have been the subject of extensive research in recent years. The electron beams they generate exhibit a broad energy spread. To conveniently characterize beams from laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA), electron spectrometers employing scintillating screens coupled with CCD cameras are typically used. In this work, we calibrate a series of DRZ phosphor screens and measure the spectra of the light they emit. The calibration was performed using the radio-frequency linear electron accelerator at Tsinghua University, which provided monoenergetic electron beams with peak energy of approximately 30 MeV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17059 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The experimental layout. electrons generated by a photo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Angular distribution of emission photons of PI200 and lanex. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Science , volume=

    Electron acceleration by a wake field forced by an intense ultrashort laser pulse , author=. Science , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  2. [2]

    Nature communications , volume=

    Optical gating and streaking of free electrons with sub-optical cycle precision , author=. Nature communications , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  3. [3]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Monoenergetic energy doubling in a hybrid laser-plasma wakefield accelerator , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  4. [4]

    Scientific Reports , volume =

    Svendsen, Kristoffer and Guénot, Diego and Svensson, Jonas Björklund and Petersson, Kristoffer and Persson, Anders and Lundh, Olle , title =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2021 , type =. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85451-8 , url =

    doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85451-8 2021

  5. [5]

    Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics , volume=

    Femtosecond ultrarelativistic electron microscopy of the laser-plasma wakefield dynamics , author=. Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  6. [6]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Femtosecond probing of plasma wakefields and observation of the plasma wake reversal using a relativistic electron bunch , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  7. [7]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Single-shot reconstruction of electron beam longitudinal phase space in a laser wakefield accelerator , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  8. [8]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Colliding ionization injection in a plasma wakefield accelerator , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Temporal characterization of ultrashort linearly chirped electron bunches generated from a laser wakefield accelerator , author=. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  2. [10]

    Nature , volume=

    High-energy colliders and the rise of the standard model , author=. Nature , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  3. [11]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Future circular colliders succeeding the LHC , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  4. [12]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Transient absorption of warm dense matter created by an X-ray free-electron laser , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  5. [13]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    X-ray multiphoton-induced Coulomb explosion images complex single molecules , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  6. [14]

    Nature , volume=

    Microstructure and crystal order during freezing of supercooled water drops , author=. Nature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  7. [15]

    Nature methods , volume=

    Time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography at the European XFEL , author=. Nature methods , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  8. [16]

    Nature methods , pages=

    Advancing time-resolved structural biology: latest strategies in cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography , author=. Nature methods , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  9. [17]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Laser electron accelerator , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1979 , publisher=

    1979

  10. [18]

    Reviews of modern physics , volume=

    Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators , author=. Reviews of modern physics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  11. [19]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Acceleration of electrons by the interaction of a bunched electron beam with a plasma , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  12. [20]

    A plasma wake field accelerator , author=. Part. Accel. , volume=

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05558 , year=

    Beam-driven plasma-wakefield acceleration , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05558 , year=

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Matched guiding and controlled injection in dark-current-free, 10-GeV-class, channel-guided laser-plasma accelerators , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  15. [23]

    Matter and Radiation at Extremes , volume=

    The acceleration of a high-charge electron bunch to 10 GeV in a 10-cm nanoparticle-assisted wakefield accelerator , author=. Matter and Radiation at Extremes , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  16. [24]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Petawatt laser guiding and electron beam acceleration to 8 GeV in a laser-heated capillary discharge waveguide , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  17. [25]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Multi-GeV electron bunches from an all-optical laser wakefield accelerator , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  18. [26]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Guided mode evolution and ionization injection in meter-scale multi-GeV laser wakefield accelerators , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  19. [27]

    Nature , volume=

    Energy doubling of 42 GeV electrons in a metre-scale plasma wakefield accelerator , author=. Nature , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  20. [28]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Dephasingless laser wakefield acceleration , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  21. [29]

    Nature Photonics , volume=

    Phase-locked laser-wakefield electron acceleration , author=. Nature Photonics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  22. [30]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Circumventing the dephasing and depletion limits of laser-wakefield acceleration , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  23. [31]

    Journal of Instrumentation , volume=

    Towards a PWFA linear collider—opportunities and challenges , author=. Journal of Instrumentation , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  24. [32]

    Nature Physics , pages=

    The positron arm of a plasma-based linear collider , author=. Nature Physics , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  25. [33]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Perspectives on the generation of electron beams from plasma-based accelerators and their near and long term applications , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  26. [34]

    High Power Laser Science and Engineering , volume=

    Free electron lasers driven by plasma accelerators: status and near-term prospects , author=. High Power Laser Science and Engineering , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  27. [35]

    Nature , volume=

    Free-electron lasing at 27 nanometres based on a laser wakefield accelerator , author=. Nature , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  28. [36]

    Nature Photonics , volume=

    Seeded free-electron laser driven by a compact laser plasma accelerator , author=. Nature Photonics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  29. [37]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Stable operation of a free-electron laser driven by a plasma accelerator , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  30. [38]

    Nature , volume=

    Free-electron lasing with compact beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerator , author=. Nature , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  31. [39]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Greater than 1000-fold gain in a free-electron laser driven by a laser-plasma accelerator with high reliability , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  32. [40]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Low emittance, high brilliance relativistic electron beams from a laser-plasma accelerator , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  33. [41]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Ultracold Electron Bunch Generation via Plasma Photocathode Emission and Acceleration in a Beam-Driven Plasma Blowout , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  34. [42]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Generating high-brightness electron beams via ionization injection by transverse colliding lasers in a plasma-wakefield accelerator , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  35. [43]

    Nature communications , volume=

    Single-stage plasma-based correlated energy spread compensation for ultrahigh 6D brightness electron beams , author=. Nature communications , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  36. [44]

    Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Ultralow emittance electron beams from a laser-wakefield accelerator , author=. Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  37. [45]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Stable and high-quality electron beams from staged laser and plasma wakefield accelerators , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  38. [46]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Ultra-high-brightness and tuneable attosecond-long electron beams with the laser wake field acceleration , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  39. [47]

    Matter and Radiation at Extremes , volume=

    Ultrahigh-brightness 50 MeV electron beam generation from laser wakefield acceleration in a weakly nonlinear regime , author=. Matter and Radiation at Extremes , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  40. [48]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    High-brightness high-energy electron beams from a laser wakefield accelerator via energy chirp control , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  41. [49]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Preclinical tumor control with a laser-accelerated high-energy electron radiotherapy prototype , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  42. [50]

    Medical physics , volume=

    Radiotherapy with laser-plasma accelerators: Monte Carlo simulation of dose deposited by an experimental quasimonoenergetic electron beam , author=. Medical physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  43. [51]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Treatment planning for laser-accelerated very-high energy electrons , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  44. [52]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Toward an effective use of laser-driven very high energy electrons for radiotherapy: Feasibility assessment of multi-field and intensity modulation irradiation schemes , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  45. [53]

    Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Four-dimensional transverse beam matrix measurement using the multiple-quadrupole scan technique , author=. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  46. [54]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Knife-edge based measurement of the 4D transverse phase space of electron beams with picometer-scale emittance , author=. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  47. [55]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Characterizing ultralow emittance electron beams using structured light fields , author=. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  48. [56]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    All-optical source size and emittance measurements of laser-accelerated electron beams , author=. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  49. [57]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Emittance measurements of a laser-wakefield-accelerated electron beam , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  50. [58]

    Harnessing Relativistic Plasma Waves as Novel Radiation Sources from Terahertz to X-Rays and Beyond , volume=

    Pepper-pot emittance measurement of laser-plasma wakefield accelerated electrons , author=. Harnessing Relativistic Plasma Waves as Novel Radiation Sources from Terahertz to X-Rays and Beyond , volume=. 2009 , organization=

    2009

  51. [59]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Characterization of laser-driven single and double electron bunches with a permanent magnet quadrupole triplet and pepper-pot mask , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  52. [60]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Low-Emittance Electron Bunches from a Laser-Plasma Accelerator Measured using Single-Shot X-Ray Spectroscopy , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  53. [61]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Intrinsic beam emittance of laser-accelerated electrons measured by x-ray spectroscopic imaging , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  54. [62]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , volume=

    Measurement of small electron-beam spots , author=. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  55. [63]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Experimental demonstration of novel beam characterization using a polarizable X-band transverse deflection structure , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  56. [64]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Beam-based commissioning of a novel X-band transverse deflection structure with variable polarization , author=. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  57. [65]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09971 , year=

    Limitations of emittance and source size measurement of laser-accelerated electron beams using the pepper-pot mask method , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09971 , year=

  58. [66]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Electro-optic technique with improved time resolution for real-time, nondestructive, single-shot measurements of femtosecond electron bunch profiles , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  59. [67]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Few femtosecond, few kiloampere electron bunch produced by a laser--plasma accelerator , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  60. [68]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Coherent-Radiation Spectroscopy of Few-Femtosecond Electron Bunches Using a Middle-Infrared Prism Spectrometer , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  61. [69]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Coherent optical signatures of electron microbunching in laser-driven plasma accelerators , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  62. [70]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume=

    Optical transition radiation interferometry and beam emittance measurements , author=. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  63. [71]

    Light: Science & Applications , volume=

    Electro-optic 3D snapshot of a laser wakefield accelerated kilo-ampere electron bunch , author=. Light: Science & Applications , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  64. [72]

    Nature Photonics , volume=

    Revealing the three-dimensional structure of microbunched plasma-wakefield-accelerated electron beams , author=. Nature Photonics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  65. [73]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Benchmarking of electro-optic monitors for femtosecond electron bunches , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  66. [74]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Capturing relativistic wakefield structures in plasmas using ultrashort high-energy electrons as a probe , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  67. [75]

    Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams , volume=

    Beam dynamics in transverse deflecting rf structures , author=. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  68. [76]

    Computer Physics Communications , volume=

    A spectral, quasi-cylindrical and dispersion-free particle-in-cell algorithm , author=. Computer Physics Communications , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  69. [77]

    Science advances , volume=

    Real-time visualization of the laser-plasma wakefield dynamics , author=. Science advances , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  70. [78]

    Nature physics , volume=

    Direct observation of relativistic broken plasma waves , author=. Nature physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  71. [79]

    Light: Science & Applications , volume=

    Femtosecond electron microscopy of relativistic electron bunches , author=. Light: Science & Applications , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  72. [80]

    Physical Review Research , volume=

    Direct visualization of shock front induced nonlinear laser wakefield dynamics , author=. Physical Review Research , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  73. [81]

    Matter and radiation at extremes , volume=

    Commissioning and first results from the new 2 100 TW laser at the WIS , author=. Matter and radiation at extremes , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  74. [82]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.2600 , year=

    Transverse deflecting cavities , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.2600 , year=

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Nature photonics , volume=

    Towards jitter-free ultrafast electron diffraction technology , author=. Nature photonics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  76. [84]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Unveiling structural effects on the DC conductivity of warm dense matter via terahertz spectroscopy and ultrafast electron diffraction , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  77. [85]

    Laser Electron Accelerator , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1979 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.267 , url =

    1979 doi

  78. [86]

    Nature , volume=

    A laser–plasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams , author=. Nature , volume=

  79. [87]

    Nature , volume=

    High-quality electron beams from a laser wakefield accelerator using plasma-channel guiding , author=. Nature , volume=

  80. [88]

    Nature , volume=

    Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser-plasma interactions , author=. Nature , volume=

  81. [89]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator , author=. Nature Physics , volume=

  82. [90]

    Nature Communications , number=

    Quasi-monoenergetic laser-plasma accelerationof electrons to 2 GeV , author=. Nature Communications , number=

  83. [91]

    Enhancement of Electron Energy to the Multi-GeV Regime by a Dual-Stage Laser-Wakefield Accelerator Pumped by Petawatt Laser Pulses , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.165002 , url =

    2013 doi

  84. [92]

    Nature Communications , year=

    Demonstration of a beam loaded nanocoulomb-class laser wakefield accelerator , author=. Nature Communications , year=

  85. [93]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Few femtosecond, few kiloampere electron bunch produced by a laser-plasma accelerator , author=. Nature Physics , volume=

  86. [94]

    Li, Y. F. and Li, D. Z. and Huang, K. and Tao, M. Z. and Li, M. H. and Zhao, J. R. and Ma, Y. and Guo, X. and Wang, J. G. and Chen, M. and Hafz, N. and Zhang, J. and Chen, L. M. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4975613 , url =

    2017 doi

  87. [95]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Absolute calibration for a broad range single shot electron spectrometer , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

  88. [96]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Absolute charge calibration of scintillating screens for relativistic electron detection , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

  89. [97]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Note: Absolute calibration of two DRZ phosphor screens using ultrashort electron bunch , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

  90. [98]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Calibration and cross-laboratory implementation of scintillating screens for electron bunch charge determination , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

  91. [99]

    Journal of Instrumentation , volume=

    Charge calibration of DRZ scintillation phosphor screens , author=. Journal of Instrumentation , volume=

  92. [100]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =

    Chiang, Chen-Wei and Chou, Ming-Chang and Lee, An-Ping and Wang, Yu-Qian and Wang, Jhih-Jia and Lin, Ming-Wei and Lau, Wai-Keung and Chou, Shao-Wei , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0225621 , url =

    2024 doi

  93. [101]

    Tsinghua Thomson scattering X-ray source , journal =

    Chuanxiang Tang and Wenhui Huang and Renkai Li and Yingchao Du and Lixin Yan and Jiaru Shi and Qiang Du and Peicheng Yu and Huaibi Chen and Taibin Du and Cheng Cheng and Yuzheng Lin , keywords =. Tsinghua Thomson scattering X-ray source , journal =. 2009 , note =. doi:https://...

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.