Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Global regularity of temperature patches for the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system with large Prandtl number

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system has unique global strong solutions whenever the Prandtl number is large enough, and that temperature patch boundaries keep their Hölder or W2,∞ regularity through the infinite-Pr

desk verdict Genuinely new large-Prandtl 3D Boussinesq patch result, but the written proof depends on deferred estimates in an unpublished companion, so referees need that preprint in hand. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13803 v1 pith:QKKJZWOZ submitted 2026-07-15 math.AP

Qianyun Miao , Jiakun Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3576D0335Q86
keywords BoussinesqsystemtemperaturepatchesPrandtlnumberglobalwell-posednessboundaryregularityStokes-transportBesovspacesinfinitelimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a large Prandtl number can substitute for small initial data in the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system, the standard convection model in which temperature is advected without diffusion. Its main theorem states that whenever Pr exceeds a threshold set by a scale-invariant norm of the initial data—the sum of the L3,∞ norm of the velocity and the L1 norm of the temperature—a unique global strong solution exists. For non-constant temperature patch data, where the initial temperature is a smooth density times the indicator of a bounded domain, the patch boundary keeps its C1,γ, W2,∞, or C2,γ regularity for all time, uniformly in the large-Prandtl range. A second theorem justifies the limit Pr→∞, showing that the Boussinesq patch solutions converge to the unique patch solution of the 3D Stokes-transport system with the same boundary regularity. This matters because large Prandtl numbers occur in real fluids and because the result offers a path around the smallness assumptions that have blocked global regularity in three dimensions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the good unknown Γ := Ω − (R^{-1,2}θ, −R^{-1,1}θ, 0)^t, the difference between vorticity and a Riesz-potential expression of temperature; it satisfies (1/Pr)(∂tΓ + u·∇Γ) − ΔΓ = (1/Pr)Ω·∇u + (1/Pr)[R^{-1}, u·∇]θ. All regularity bounds reduce to estimates on Γ and its tangential derivatives through the Biot–Savart identity, which splits ∇u into a part controlled by Γ and parts controlled directly by θ. For boundary regularity, an admissible system of five divergence-free conormal vector fields W tangent to the initial boundary is transported by the flow; a lemma converts striated regularity of W into C^{k,γ} or W^{k,∞} regularity of the patch boundary. Large Pr enter

What would settle it

Compute the B^{-1/2}_{∞,1}(R^3) norm of the characteristic function 1_{D0} of a smooth bounded domain. The high-frequency Littlewood–Paley blocks are of order one, so the sum defining this norm diverges; this shows the embedding invoked to derive estimate (4.22) cannot hold for patch data. A decisive check is whether some alternative estimate supplies the same L^p control of the commutator [R^{-1}, u·∇]θ; without such a replacement, the global boundary-regularity results lack support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for divergence-free u0∈H^{1/2}(R^3) and θ0∈L^1∩L^s(R^3), s>3, the condition Pr ≥ (‖u0‖_{L^{3,∞}} + ‖θ0‖_{L^1})/c* with a universal small constant c* guarantees a unique global strong solution of the Boussinesq system. The new input is a global a priori bound u∈L∞_T(H^{1/2})∩L^2_T(H^{3/2}) obtained from an energy argument and an L∞_T(L^{3,∞}) estimate of u; once that is in hand, uniqueness follows by adapting the existing 3D framework. For temperature patch data θ0 = θ̄0 1_{D0}, the paper proves that the transported boundary ∂D(t) = X_t(∂D0) remains in C^{1,γ}, W^{2,∞}, and C^{2,γ} with bounds uniform in Pr∈[Pr*,∞). Theorem 1.4 passes to the limit Pr→∞ and id

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on a frequency-space commutator bound that assumes the temperature is smooth enough to lie in a certain Besov space; for a temperature patch, whose temperature is a step function across the boundary, that assumption is invalid, and the regularity-persistence estimates collapse unless the bound is replaced by a correct estimate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Global well-posedness holds for the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system with large initial data, provided the Prandtl number is above the stated scale-invariant threshold; no smallness of data is required.
  • Temperature patch boundaries of class C1,γ, W2,∞, or C2,γ remain in that class globally in time, uniformly over all Pr in [Pr*, ∞).
  • The infinite-Prandtl limit is rigorously justified: Boussinesq patch solutions converge to the unique patch solution of the 3D Stokes-transport system, with the same boundary regularity persistence.
  • The threshold depends only on a scale-invariant norm of the initial data, so the result identifies a physically meaningful large-parameter regime for convection models rather than a small-data regime.
  • The theorem provides a genuinely 3D analogue of the earlier 2D Stokes-transport patch regularity result, extending the known theory to whole-space R^3.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is as robust as the proof suggests, the same large-Prandtl idea should transfer to bounded domains or periodic boxes, where the authors note the argument naturally extends.
  • A concrete next step is to upgrade the boundary-regularity persistence to C^{k,γ} for all k≥3 with uniform-in-Pr estimates, which the authors sketch in a remark but do not fully carry out here.
  • The convergence proof requires well-prepared initial data; removing this well-preparedness would make the infinite-Prandtl limit a more robust selection principle for 3D convective flows.
  • The proof's dependence on the L3,∞ norm of the velocity suggests that a mild-solution formulation using the heat semigroup might work in the large-Prandtl regime, potentially opening a route to data that are only locally integrable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system (B) and proves global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions when the Prandtl number Pr is larger than a threshold depending only on scale-invariant norms of the initial data (Theorem 1.1, Section 3). For non-constant temperature patch initial data, the authors further prove global persistence of C^{1,γ}, W^{2,∞}, and C^{2,γ} regularity of the patch boundary uniformly in Pr ∈ [Pr*,∞): Theorem 1.1(1)-(3), proved in Sections 4.1-4.3. Finally, Theorem 1.4 and Proposition 5.1 justify the infinite-Prandtl limit to the 3D Stokes-transport system and show that the limit patch solution preserves the same boundary regularity. The central technical tool is the 'good unknown' Γ introduced in (1.11), which satisfies the transport-diffusion equation (4.5) and allows uniform-in-Pr estimates.

Significance. If the proof is complete, the result is a significant advance: it gives the first global strong well-posedness for the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system with large data in a physically relevant parameter regime, and it provides the 3D analogue of Grayer II's 2D Stokes-transport patch result. The uniform-in-Pr boundary-regularity estimates and the rigorous infinite-Prandtl limit are valuable additions. The paper is generally well structured, and the main geometric framework (admissible conormal vectors, striated estimates, the Γ equation) is appropriate. The main weakness is that several load-bearing commutator and smoothing estimates — Lemma 2.6(2.9), (2.11), and Lemma 2.8(2.19)-(2.20) — are asserted with proofs deferred to an unreviewed companion preprint [44] by the same research group, including co-author J. Yang. Because these estimates are used in the core proofs of Propositions 4.3 and 4.4 and hence in the main persistence theorems, the paper is not self-contained at key points. This is a verifiability gap that must be closed before the results can be considered fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Lemmas 2.6 and 2.8] The product estimate (2.9), the commutator estimates (2.11)-(2.12), and the smoothing estimates (2.19)-(2.20) are all asserted with proofs omitted and referred to the companion preprint [44] ('see e.g. [44]', 'one can see [44] for more details', 'one can see [44] for the details'). These are not cosmetic: (2.9) and (2.19) are used directly in the proof of Proposition 4.4 (equations (4.42)-(4.47)), and (2.11) is used in Proposition 4.3 to control a commutator in the W^{2,∞} persistence proof. Thus the C^{2,γ} and W^{2,∞} boundary-regularity claims of Theorems 1.1 and 1.4 rest on estimates whose derivations are not available in the manuscript. A referee cannot verify such load-bearing steps from a preprint that is not provided and is not peer-reviewed. Please include complete proofs of (2.9), (2.11), (2.19), and (2.20), either in the paper or in a clearly identified, freely accessible comp
  2. [§4.3, Proposition 4.4] The proof of the C^{2,γ} persistence relies on the smoothing estimate (2.19) for the low-regularity source in F^{(1)}. This estimate is stated in Lemma 2.8(2) with a proof deferred to [44]; the supporting commutator estimate (2.20) is also deferred. Since Proposition 4.4 is the only place where the central C^{2,γ} uniformity in Pr is established, this is a load-bearing gap. Even if (2.19) is true, the manuscript as submitted does not provide the tools to verify it, and the proof of Theorem 1.1(3) is therefore incomplete.
  3. [§3, global well-posedness] The global existence and uniqueness part of Theorem 1.1 is only sketched: after the a priori estimates (3.7)-(3.8), the text says that uniqueness follows by adapting [42, Lemma 3.2] and that existence follows by 'a standard approximation process (e.g. see [42])'. This is acceptable if the adaptation is indeed routine, but the paper does not spell out how the H^{1/2} initial data and the L^1∩L^s temperature are handled in the approximation. Given that the main novelty is the large-Prandtl criterion, the authors should either include the approximation/uniqueness argument or give a precise statement of which part of [42] is being used and why it applies verbatim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.22)] The reader's concern about L∞↪B^{-1/2}_{∞,1} is not valid. With the nonhomogeneous Besov normalization in Definition 2.5, one has ∑_{q≥-1} 2^{-q/2}‖Δ_q f‖_{L∞} ≤ C‖f‖_{L∞}, since the sum over q≥-1 converges. Thus (4.22) is not invalidated by the discontinuity of the patch indicator. The estimate is legitimate.
  2. [Eq. (4.44) and surrounding paragraph] In the paragraph following (4.44), when p>3 the displayed estimate for the initial-data part uses F^{(1)} in two places, but the equation (4.43) for F^{(2)} is the one with nonzero initial data. This appears to be a typo: the terms with kΔ_{W0}Γ0k_{B^{-1}_{∞,∞}} should involve F^{(2)}. Please correct.
  3. [Remark 1.2] The remark about persistence of higher C^{k,γ} and W^{k,∞} regularity refers again to [44] for the proof. Since [44] is unpublished and not provided, this remark should be clearly labelled as conditional on the companion preprint.
  4. [Throughout] The notation 'Ceexp{CT}' is nonstandard and ambiguous: it could mean C exp(C T) or C exp(exp(C T)). Since the paper repeatedly uses Grönwall inequalities in which the right-hand side contains e^{∫‖∇u‖_{L∞}}, please clarify the convention so the reader can track whether constants are single- or double-exponential.
  5. [References] Reference [44] is to a preprint by the same authors (including co-author J. Yang). The manuscript should state whether [44] has been posted to arXiv and, if so, provide the arXiv identifier so that referees and readers can access it.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

No definitional or fitted-input circularity; the global existence and infinite-Prandtl-limit arguments are internally derived. However, the C^{2,\gamma} and higher-order patch regularity proofs rest on key estimates whose proofs are explicitly deferred to the authors' own companion preprint [44], making the verification chain partly self-citational and load-bearing.

  1. self citation load bearing [Lemma 2.6, proof of (2.9) and (2.11)-(2.12), p. 11; used in Prop. 4.4, Eqs. (4.42)-(4.47)]
    "The proof of (2.9) can be done using Bony’s decomposition and arguing similarly as that of (2.8), and we here omit the details (see e.g. [44] for the proof). ... The proof of (2.12) is in a similar manner as that of (2.11): by deriving a striated version of the expression formula (2.14) for @W ([m(D); u · r]θ), the wanted estimate (2.12) directly follows. One can see [44] for more details."

    Estimate (2.9) is the product estimate used in Proposition 4.4 to control ΔW·∇Γ and ∇W:∇²Γ in B^{-1}_{∞,∞}, while (2.11)-(2.12) are the commutator estimates controlling @W r³Λ^{-4}θ in Sections 4.2-4.3. These are not proved in the paper: the proofs are explicitly deferred to [44], a preprint whose authors include co-author J. Yang. Since these estimates drive the uniform W^{2,∞} and C^{2,γ} persistence bounds, the derivation at that point is supported by a load-bearing self-citation rather than by a self-contained proof.

  2. self citation load bearing [Lemma 2.8, proof of (2.19)-(2.20), p. 12; used in Prop. 4.4 for F^{(1)}]
    "For the proof of (2.19), it can be treated in a similar manner as showing (2.18), and we only need to replace the estimate of k(2^{qs}k[Δ_q; u·r]θk_{L^p})_{q≥−1}k_{ℓ^r} (as in [4, Lemma 2.100]) with the following commutator estimate (2.20); the proof of (2.20) can be done using the standard Littlewood-Paley theory and one can see [44] for the details."

    Estimate (2.19) is the smoothing estimate that produces the uniform bound for F^{(1)}, the forced part of @W Γ in Proposition 4.4; together with (2.18) it yields (4.44)-(4.45) and hence the C^{2,γ} boundary estimate (4.47). The manuscript does not prove (2.19) or the commutator bound (2.20); it refers to [44], a preprint sharing co-author J. Yang. The central regularity step is therefore outsourced to an unverified self-citation rather than derived internally. This is not a definitional reduction, but it is a load-bearing gap in the claimed derivation chain.

full rationale

The existence-uniqueness part of Theorem 1.1 is not circular: it is derived from energy estimates, L^{3,∞} bootstrap bounds, and parabolic smoothing in Section 3, with references to [21] and [42] used only for standard arguments. The infinite-Prandtl limit in Section 5 is a compactness argument built on those uniform estimates, again not circular. The principal concern is the patch-regularity part: the paper introduces the good unknown Γ and then relies on a sequence of Besov/commutator estimates (2.9), (2.11)-(2.12), (2.19)-(2.20) whose proofs are explicitly deferred to the companion preprint [44], authored by Lazar, Xue, and Yang. These estimates are load-bearing for the W^{2,∞} and C^{2,γ} persistence claims: (2.9) controls the product terms in the equation for @W Γ, while (2.19)-(2.20) provide the smoothing bounds that yield the uniform estimates (4.44)-(4.47). Because the manuscript does not supply or verify these estimates, the proof of the main regularity result at that point reduces to a citation of the authors' own unpublished work. This is partial circularity through a self-citation chain, not a fitted-input or definitional circularity, and the central 3D content and existence theorem still have independent mathematical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard harmonic analysis, on the assumed PDE models, on a handful of non-standard estimates borrowed from the authors' own unpublished material, and on one false functional-embedding. The only hand-tuned quantity is the universal small constant c*, which is not fitted to data. No new physical entities are introduced, only the mathematical construct Γ.

free parameters (1)
  • c* (universal small constant) = c* ≤ 1/(8 C C0) (also c* ≤ 1/(6 C0^2))
    Chosen by hand in (3.4) and (3.6) to close the L^{3,∞} bootstrap and the H^{1/2} estimate. It is not fitted to data but is a tuning constant that makes the proof work, hence it is a free parameter in the sense of 'chosen by hand to make a derivation work'.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard Littlewood-Paley/Besov space theory, including Bony's decomposition, Calderón-Zygmund and Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities, Bernstein inequalities, and Aubin-Lions compactness.
    Used throughout Sections 2–5 without proof; these are standard background results in harmonic-analysis PDE.
  • domain assumption The Boussinesq model (B) and Stokes-transport model (ST) as the governing equations, with ν=1 normalization and the notion of strong/patch solutions.
    The physical/mathematical validity of these PDE models is assumed; the paper contributes theorems about these models, not a derivation of the models.
  • ad hoc to paper Commutator and smoothing estimates (2.11), (2.12), (2.19), (2.20) stated in Lemmas 2.6 and 2.8 hold as asserted.
    These estimates are load-bearing for Propositions 4.3–4.4 but their proofs are deferred to the unpublished preprint [44] by Lazar–Xue–Yang, involving co-author J. Yang. They are not proved in the present paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The embedding L∞(R^3) ↪ B^{-1/2}_{∞,1}(R^3) used in (4.22).
    This embedding is false in general, and specifically fails for the discontinuous temperature patch initial data θ0=θ̄0 1_{D0}. The proof of Proposition 4.2 relies on it to bound the commutator [R^{-1},u·∇]θ in L^p, making it a load-bearing assumption.
invented entities (1)
  • Γ (the 'good unknown')
    purpose: Γ := Ω - R^{-1}θ, where R^{-1}θ = Λ^{-2}(∂_2θ, -∂_1θ, 0). It satisfies an equation whose estimates are uniform in Pr and is used to decompose ∇u in (1.12).
    Γ is a mathematical auxiliary quantity introduced to absorb the Pr-dependence in the vorticity equation; it has no falsifiable predictive content outside the proof. Its usefulness is internal to the argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global regularity of temperature patches for the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system with large Prandtl number." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QKKJZWOZ

@misc{pith2026260713803,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global regularity of temperature patches for the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system with large Prandtl number},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QKKJZWOZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13803}
}
abstract

So far the global well-posedness of strong solutions for the 3D non-diffusive Boussinesq system with large initial data remains a remarkable open problem. In this paper, we solve this problem in the regime of large Prandtl number. More precisely, we prove the global existence and uniqueness of strong solution for this 3D Boussinesq system associated with initial data $(u_0,\theta_0)\in H^{\frac{1}{2}}(\mathbb{R}^3) \times (L^1\cap L^s(\mathbb{R}^3))$ with $s>3$, provided that the Prandtl number is sufficiently large (the threshold depends only on a scale-invariant norm of $(u_0,\theta_0)$); moreover, for the non-constant temperature patch initial data, we establish the global persistence of $C^{1,\gamma}$, $W^{2,\infty}$, and $C^{2,\gamma}$ ($0<\gamma<1$) boundary regularity of the evolved temperature patch, with corresponding estimates uniform in the large Prandtl number regime. Furthermore, we rigorously justify the limit as the Prandtl number tends to infinity and show that the patch solution of the 3D Boussinesq system converges to the unique patch solution of the 3D Stokes-transport system, and that the patch boundary regularity in $C^{1,\gamma}$, $W^{2,\infty}$, and $C^{2,\gamma}$ is preserved globally in time. In particular, our result for the 3D Stokes-transport system can be viewed as the 3D analogue of the main result in Grayer II [ARMA 2023] concerning 2D Stokes-transport system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [44]

    Lazar, L

    O. Lazar, L. Xue, and J. Yang, On the W k,∞ and C k,γ boundary regularity of temperature patches for the 2D non-diffusive Boussinesq system. Preprint

  2. [42]

    Lazar, Y

    O. Lazar, Y. Li, and L. Xue, On the regularity of temperature fronts for the 3D viscous Boussinesq system. Indiana Math. Univ. J., 73 (2024), 1005–1060

    2024

  3. [1]

    Abidi, and T

    H. Abidi, and T. Hmidi, On the global well-posedness for Boussinesq system, J. Differential Equations, 233 (2007), 199–220

    2007

  4. [2]

    Abidi, T

    H. Abidi, T. Hmidi, and S. Keraani, On the global regularity of axisymmetric Navier-Stokes-Boussinesq system. Discrete Contin Dyn. Syst., 29 (2011), 737–756

    2011

  5. [3]

    Antontsev, A

    S. Antontsev, A. Meirmanov, and B.V. Yurinsky, A free-boundary problem for Stokes equations: classical solu- tions. Interfaces Free Bound., 2 (2000), 413–424

    2000

  6. [4]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin, Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations . Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 343, Springer-Verlag, (2011)

    2011

  7. [5]

    A. L. Bertozzi, and P. Constantin, Global regularity for vortex patches. Comm. Math. Phys., 152 (1993), 19–28

    1993

  8. [6]

    Bonnivard, A

    M. Bonnivard, A. Mecherbet, On the instability of travelling wave solutions for the transport-Stokes equation. Comm. Math. Sci., 23 (2025), no. 2, 299–328

    2025

Show all 64 references
  1. [7]

    Chae, Global regularity for the 2D Boussinesq equations with partial viscosity terms

    D. Chae, Global regularity for the 2D Boussinesq equations with partial viscosity terms. Adv. Math., 203 (2006), pp. 497–513

    2006

  2. [8]

    D. Chae, Q. Miao, and L. Xue, Global regularity of non-diffusive temperature fronts for the 2D viscous Boussinesq system, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 54 (2022), 4043–4103

    2022

  3. [9]

    D. Chae, Q. Miao, and L. Xue, Erratum: global regularity of nondiffusive temperature fronts for the two- dimensional viscous Boussinesq system, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 56 (2024), 8125–8130

    2024

  4. [10]

    Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability

    S. Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability . The International Series of Monographs on Physics. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)

    1961

  5. [11]

    Chanillo, and A

    S. Chanillo, and A. Malchiodi, Sharp bounds on the Nusselt number in Rayleigh-Bénard convection and a bilinear estimate by Coifman-Meyer. Invent. Math., 240 (2025), 633–660

    2025

  6. [12]

    Chemin, Persistance de structures géométriques dans les fluides incompressibles bidimensionnels

    J.-Y. Chemin, Persistance de structures géométriques dans les fluides incompressibles bidimensionnels. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 4e série, 26 (1993), no. 4, 517–542

    1993

  7. [13]

    Chen, and T

    J. Chen, and T. Y. Hou, Finite time blowup of 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler equations with C 1,α velocity and boundary. Commun. Math. Phys., 383 (2021), no. 3, 1559–1667

    2021

  8. [14]

    Chen, and T

    J. Chen, and T. Y. Hou, Stable nearly self-similar blowup of the 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler enquations with smooth initial data I: Analysis. ArXiv:2210.07191v3

    arXiv

  9. [15]

    Q. Chen, C. Miao, and Z. Zhang, A new Bernstein’s inequality and the 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 271 (2007), 821–838

    2007

  10. [16]

    Choffrut, C

    A. Choffrut, C. Nobili, and F. Otto, Upper bounds on Nusselt number at finite Prandtl number. J. Differ. Equ., 260 (2016), no. 4, 3860–3880

    2016

  11. [17]

    Constantin, and C

    P. Constantin, and C. R. Doering, Infinite Prandtl number convection. J. Stat. Phys., 94 (1999), 159–172

    1999

  12. [18]

    Dalibard, J

    A.-L. Dalibard, J. Guillod, and A. Leblond, Long-time behavior of the Stokes-transport system in a channel. Analysis and PDE, 18 (2025), no. 8, 1955–2032

    2025

  13. [19]

    Danchin, Persistance de structures géométriques et limite non visqueuse pour les fluides incompressibles en dimension quelconque

    R. Danchin, Persistance de structures géométriques et limite non visqueuse pour les fluides incompressibles en dimension quelconque. Bull. Soc. Math. France, 127 (1999), no. 2, 179–227

    1999

  14. [20]

    Danchin, and M

    R. Danchin, and M. Païcu, Existence and uniqueness results for the Boussinesq system with data in Lorentz spaces. Phys. D. Nonlinear Phenomena, 237 (2008), 1444–1460

    2008

  15. [21]

    Danchin, and M

    R. Danchin, and M. Païcu, Les théorèmes de Leray et de Fujita-Kato pour le système de Boussinesq partiellement visqueux. Bull. Soc. Math. France., 136 (2008), no. 2, 261–309

    2008

  16. [22]

    Danchin, and X

    R. Danchin, and X. Zhang, Global persistence of geometrical structures for the Boussinesq equation with no diffusion. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ., 42 (2017), no. 1, 68–99

    2017

  17. [23]

    Dong, and Y

    L. Dong, and Y. Sun, On asymptotic stability of the 3D Boussinesq equations without heat conduction. Sci. China Math., 67 (2024), no. 2, 253–280

    2024

  18. [24]

    Gamblin, and X

    P. Gamblin, and X. Saint-Raymond, On three-dimensional vortex patches. Bull. Soc. Math. France, 123 (1995), 375–424

    1995

  19. [25]

    Gancedo, and E

    F. Gancedo, and E. García-Juárez, Global regularity for 2D Boussinesq temperature patches with no diffusion. Ann. PDE, 3 (2017), no. 2, Art. 14, 34pp

    2017

  20. [26]

    Gancedo, and E

    F. Gancedo, and E. García-Juárez, Regularity results for viscous 3D Boussinesq temperature fronts. Comm. Math. Phys., 376 (2020), 1705–1736

    2020

  21. [27]

    Gancedo, R

    F. Gancedo, R. Granero-Belinchón, and E. Salguero, On the global well-posedness of interface dynamics for gravity Stokes flow. J. Differential Equations, 428 (2025), 654–687

    2025

  22. [28]

    Gancedo, R

    F. Gancedo, R. Granero-Belinchón, and E. Salguero, Long time interface dynamics for gravity Stokes flow. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 57 (2025), no. 2, 1680–1724

    2025

  23. [29]

    Gancedo, R

    F. Gancedo, R. Granero-Belinchón, Z. Hu, E. Salguero, and Y. Yao, Unstable interface dynamics for gravity Stokes flow. ArXiv:2601.18460. 30 QIANYUN MIAO AND JIAKUN YANG

  24. [30]

    Grayer II, Dynamics of density patches in infinite Prandtl number convection

    H. Grayer II, Dynamics of density patches in infinite Prandtl number convection. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 247 (2023), Art. no. 69

    2023

  25. [31]

    Hmidi, and S

    T. Hmidi, and S. Keraani, On the global well-posedness of the two-dimensional Boussinesq system with a zero diffusivity. Adv. Differential Equations, 12 (2007), 461–480

    2007

  26. [32]

    Hmidi, S

    T. Hmidi, S. Keraani, and F. Rousset, Global well-posedness for a Boussinesq-Navier-Stokes system with critical dissipation. J. Differential Equations, 249 (2010), 2147–2174

    2010

  27. [33]

    Hmidi, S

    T. Hmidi, S. Keraani, and F. Rousset, Global well-posedness for Euler–Boussinesq system with critical dissipation. Commun. Partial. Differ. Equ., 36 (2011), 420–445

    2011

  28. [34]

    Hmidi, and F

    T. Hmidi, and F. Rousset, Global well-posedness for the Navier-Stokes-Boussinesq system with axisymmetric data. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire, 27 (2010), 1227–1246

    2010

  29. [35]

    R. M. Höfer, Sedimentation of inertialess particles in Stokes flows. Commun. Math. Phys., 360 (2018), pp. 55, 101

    2018

  30. [36]

    R. M. Höfer, and R. Schubert, The influence of Einstein’s effective viscosity on sedimentation at very small particle volume fraction. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse non linéaire., 38 (2021), 1897–1927

    2021

  31. [37]

    R. M. Höfer, and R. Schubert, Sedimentation of particles with very small inertia I: Convergence to the transport- Stokes equation. Duke Math. J., 174 (2025), no. 4, 615–684

    2025

  32. [38]

    Hou, and C

    T. Hou, and C. Li, Global well-posedness of the viscous Boussinesq equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 12 (2005), 1–12

    2005

  33. [39]

    W. Hu, I. Kukavica, and M. Ziane, Persistence of regularity for the viscous Boussinesq equations with zero diffusivity. Asymptot. Anal., 91 (2015), 111–124

    2015

  34. [40]

    Inversi, Lagrangian solutions to the transport-Stokes system

    M. Inversi, Lagrangian solutions to the transport-Stokes system. Nonlinear Anal., 235 (2023), no. 113333

    2023

  35. [41]

    Kiselev, and X

    A. Kiselev, and X. Luo, Illposedness of C 2 vortex patches. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 247 (2023), 1–49

    2023

  36. [43]

    Lazar, L

    O. Lazar, L. Xue, and J. Yang, Global regularity and infinite Prandtl number limit of temperature patches for the 2D Boussinesq system. Math. Ann., 392 (2025), 1375–1446

    2025

  37. [45]

    Lions, Quelque méthodes de résolution des problemes aux limites non linéaires

    J.-L. Lions, Quelque méthodes de résolution des problemes aux limites non linéaires . Paris: Dunod-Gauth, 1969

    1969

  38. [46]

    Leblond, Well-posedness of the Stokes-transport system in bounded domains and in the infinite strip

    A. Leblond, Well-posedness of the Stokes-transport system in bounded domains and in the infinite strip. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 158 (2022), 120–143

    2022

  39. [47]

    A. J. Majda, Introduction to PDEs and Waves for the Atmosphere and Ocean . Courant Lect. Notes Math. 9, Courant Institute, New York, (2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    A. J. Majda, and A. L. Bertozzi, Vorticity and incompressible flow . Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics,

  41. [49]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    Mecherbet, Sedimentation of particles in Stokes flow

    A. Mecherbet, Sedimentation of particles in Stokes flow. Kinet. Relat. Models, 12 (2019), no. 5, 995–1044

    2019

  43. [51]

    Mecherbet, On the sedimentation of a droplet in Stokes flow

    A. Mecherbet, On the sedimentation of a droplet in Stokes flow. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 19 (2021), 1627–1654

    2021

  44. [52]

    Mecherbet, and F

    A. Mecherbet, and F. Sueur, A few remarks on the transport-Stokes system. Annales Henri Lebesgue, 7 (2024), 1367–1408

    2024

  45. [53]

    Otto, and C

    F. Otto, and C. Seis, Rayleigh-Bénard convection: improved bounds on the Nusselt number. J. Math. Phys., 52 (2011), no. 8, Art. no. 083702, 24 pp

    2011

  46. [54]

    Park, Growth of curvature and perimeter of temperature patches in the 2D Boussinesq equations

    J. Park, Growth of curvature and perimeter of temperature patches in the 2D Boussinesq equations. Nonlinearity, 37 (2024), no. 6, Paper No. 065001, 15 pp

    2024

  47. [55]

    Park, Stability analysis of the incompressible porous media equation and the Stokes transport system via energy structure

    J. Park, Stability analysis of the incompressible porous media equation and the Stokes transport system via energy structure. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 64 (2025), Art. No. 169

    2025

  48. [56]

    Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics , Springer, New York, (1987)

    J. Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics , Springer, New York, (1987)

    1987

  49. [57]

    Radu, Existence and regularity for vortex patch solutions of the 2D Euler equations

    R.-O. Radu, Existence and regularity for vortex patch solutions of the 2D Euler equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 71 (2022), 2195–2230

    2022

  50. [58]

    Seis, Infinite Prandtl number convection with Navier-slip boundary conditions

    C. Seis, Infinite Prandtl number convection with Navier-slip boundary conditions. Comm. Math. Phys., 407 (2026), Art. no. 125

    2026

  51. [59]

    Serfati, Une preuve directe d’existence globale des vortex patches 2D

    Ph. Serfati, Une preuve directe d’existence globale des vortex patches 2D. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 318 (1994), no. 6, 515–518

    1994

  52. [60]

    Sinambela, W

    D. Sinambela, W. Zhao, and R. Zi, Asymptotic stability of the two-dimensional Couette flow for the Stokes- transport equation in a finite channel. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 379 (2026), no. 1, 195–239

    2026

  53. [61]

    Sinambela, W

    D. Sinambela, W. Zhao, and R. Zi, Asymptotic stability of the three-dimensional Couette flow for the Stokes- transport equation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 250 (2026), no. 4, Paper No. 63. TEMPERATURE PATCHES FOR 3D BOUSSINESQ SYSTEM WITH LARGE PRANDTL NUMBER 31

    2026

  54. [62]

    Wang, Infinite Prandtl number limit of Rayleigh-Bénard convection

    X. Wang, Infinite Prandtl number limit of Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 57 (2004), no. 10, 1265–1282

    2004

  55. [63]

    Wang, Stationary statistical properties of Rayleigh-Bénard convection at large Prandtl number

    X. Wang, Stationary statistical properties of Rayleigh-Bénard convection at large Prandtl number. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 61 (2008), no. 6, 789–815

    2008

  56. [64]

    Wang, Bound on vertical heat transport at large Prandtl number

    X. Wang, Bound on vertical heat transport at large Prandtl number. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom., 237 (2008), no. 6, 854–858. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P. R. China Email address : qianyunm@bit.edu.cn School of Mathemati...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.