pith. sign in

arxiv: 1808.04408 · v4 · pith:QLBP2ISEnew · submitted 2018-08-13 · 📊 stat.AP

Combined background information for meta-analysis evaluation

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords meta-analysisstudiesbackgroundexamineexamplesinformationobservationalp-value
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Massive numbers of meta-analysis studies are being published. A Google Scholar search of "systematic review and meta-analysis" returns about 452k hits since 2014. The search was done on Jan 14, 2019. There is a need to have some way to judge the reliability of a positive claim made in a meta-analysis that uses observational studies. Our idea is to examine the quality of the observational studies used in the meta-analysis and to examine the heterogeneity of those studies. We provide background information and examples: a listing of negative studies, a simulation of p-value plots, and multiple examples of p-value plots.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.