Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

$L$-functions of elliptic curves in ring class extensions of real quadratic fields via regularized theta liftings

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims an exact formula for the central derivative of a base-changed elliptic curve L-function over a real quadratic field, expressed as a twisted sum of constant terms and automorphic Green's functions evaluated along geodesics.

desk verdict A plausible real-quadratic analogue of Gross–Zagier, but the main formula rests on an undefined theta series and an unspecified Maass form preimage. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.10277 v2 pith:QLPDTANC submitted 2025-10-11 math.NT

Jeanine Van Order This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NT MSC 11F6711F2711F4111G4011F3211F4611G0511G18
keywords L-functionsellipticcurvesrealquadraticfieldsringclasscharactersregularizedthetaliftingsautomorphicGreen'sfunctionsHirzebruch-ZagierdivisorsGross-Zagierformula
topics Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to prove an integral formula for the central derivative Λ′(1/2, Π⊗χ) of the L-function of an elliptic curve base-changed to a real quadratic field and twisted by a ring class character. When the functional equation forces the central value to vanish, the derivative is written as a χ-twisted sum of two pieces: a constant term of a theta product and a sum of automorphic Green's functions along geodesics on X0(N)×X0(N). If the formula holds, it supplies a real-quadratic analogue of the Gross-Zagier formula, where central derivatives are captured by geodesic Green's sums rather than by CM point heights. The paper also derives consequences for the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, including a conditional description of Tate-Shafarevich and regulator terms and an unconditional BSD-related identity for E and its quadratic twist.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the regularized theta lift Φ(f_{0,A}, ·) of a harmonic weak Maass form f_{0,A} whose shadow under the ξ0-operator is a canonical vector-valued lift of the eigenform f. Through the exceptional isomorphism GSpin(V_A) ≅ GL_2^2, the ambient spin Shimura variety is identified with Y0(N) × Y0(N), and the evaluation of the theta lift along the anisotropic geodesic subspace V_{A,2} reduces, via the Siegel-Weil formula and the derivative Eisenstein series E′_{L_2}(τ,0;2), to the displayed Green's sums. The factor √d_K/(log ε_K h_K) comes from Dirichlet's analytic class number formula for L(1, η).

What would settle it

Compute both sides of Theorem 4.17 for a small explicit example: take a semistable elliptic curve E with conductor N such that N^- is the squarefree product of an odd number of primes, a real quadratic field K of small discriminant with (N, d_K)=1, and a ring class character χ; numerically evaluate the χ-twisted finite sum of constant terms and geodesic Green's sums and compare it with a directly computed Λ′(1/2, Π⊗χ). A mismatch, or a variation of the right-hand side when f_{0,A} is replaced by another harmonic weak Maass form with the same shadow, would disprove the stated identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim (Theorem 4.17, Corollary 4.18) is an exact identity: for an elliptic curve E/Q with associated newform f, a real quadratic field K of discriminant d_K prime to the conductor N, and a ring class character χ of conductor c, the completed central derivative Λ′(1/2, Π⊗χ) — equivalently Λ′(E/K, χ, 1) — equals −√d_K/(log ε_K h_K) times half the χ-twisted sum, over ideal classes A of Pic(O_c), of CT⟨⟨f⁺_{0,A}(τ), θ⁺_{L_{A,1}}⊗E_{L_{A,2}}(τ)⟩⟩ plus (vol(U_{A,2})/2) times the automorphic Green's function G_{Z(f_{0,A})} evaluated along the geodesic set G(V_{A,2}). The proof adapts the Bruinier-Yang calculation, replacing the holomorphic projection used in Gross-Zagier by the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the harmonic weak Maass forms f_{0,A} are well-defined enough that the combination of the constant term and the Green's function sum does not depend on the choice of preimage under ξ0; only the shadow ξ0(f_{0,A}) = g_{f,A} is fixed, and the kernel of ξ0 is infinite-dimensional.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the identity is correct, central derivatives in the real-quadratic forced-vanishing case become explicit finite sums over the class group, making numerical tests of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture feasible for ranks one.
  • The formula gives a real-quadratic analogue of Gross-Zagier: the leading Taylor coefficient at s=1/2 is encoded by automorphic Green's functions along geodesics, suggesting a height-like interpretation for rank-one curves over ring class fields of real quadratic fields, where no Heegner point construction is known.
  • Under the ersatz Heegner hypothesis (N^- the squarefree product of an odd number of primes), the paper's formula applies and produces non-vanishing expressions for Λ′(1/2, Π⊗χ), which can be compared against BSD regulator terms.
  • The unconditional Theorem 5.1 relates the product of BSD constants of E and its quadratic twist to the same geodesic Green's sums up to powers of 2 and 3, giving a concrete arithmetic identity independent of the rank-one conjecture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The formula's right-hand side depends on the choice of harmonic weak Maass form f_{0,A} through its holomorphic part; because the kernel of ξ0 is infinite-dimensional, a canonical normalization (e.g., minimal principal part or a specific preimage) is needed. Testing whether the displayed combination is actually independent of this choice is a natural next step.
  • The geodesic sets G(V_{A,2}) embed into boundary components of Borel-Serre compactifications of Siegel threefolds; the paper suggests this may illuminate the provenance of Stark-Heegner points for real quadratic fields, which could be probed by constructing p-adic analogues of the Green's sums.
  • Since the constant term (3) is algebraic while the Green's function values are typically periods, the formula predicts a clean separation between algebraic and transcendental parts of Λ′(1/2, Π⊗χ), a property that could be checked numerically for small conductors and discriminants.
  • The same framework might extend to imaginary quadratic fields or higher-weight newforms, potentially yielding a unified treatment of the Gross-Zagier formula over both types of quadratic fields via boundary components of Shimura varieties — though this is not worked out in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an integral formula for central derivative values Λ'(1/2, Π⊗χ) of elliptic curves over Q base-changed to a real quadratic field K and twisted by a ring class character χ, under a hypothesis making the central value vanish. The construction uses regularized theta lifts on quadratic spaces of signature (2,2), identifies the associated spin Shimura variety with Y0(N)×Y0(N), evaluates the lifts along geodesic subsets associated to ideal classes of K, and expresses the resulting sum in terms of automorphic Green's functions for Hirzebruch–Zagier-like divisors. The final theorem (Theorem 4.17 / Corollary 4.18) is then related to Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer constants in Section 5. The paper is organized around a Bruinier–Yang-style calculation: an identity for a regularized theta lift (Theorem 4.15), a bridge to the Rankin–Selberg L-function of the base-change representation (Corollary 4.16), and a twisted summation over the class group using the analytic class number formula.

Significance. If correct, the main theorem would give a real-quadratic analogue of the Gross–Zagier formula, expressing a central derivative of an L-function of an elliptic curve twisted by a real-quadratic ring class character as a χ-twisted sum of automorphic Green's functions evaluated on real geodesic cycles. Such a formula would be a notable advance and would connect the (still conjectural) arithmetic of elliptic curves over real quadratic fields to established theta-lifting machinery. The paper has credible structural strengths: it uses the standard apparatus of regularized theta lifts, the Bruinier–Funke ξ-operator, Siegel–Weil formulas, Stokes's theorem, and the analytic class number formula, and it gives an explicit vector-valued lift g_{f,A} of the elliptic curve newform in Theorem 4.6. The proposed formula is also sufficiently explicit to be numerically testable in principle. However, the central analytic bridge from the automorphic objects to the base-change L-function is not rigorously established, and the main theorem depends on an invalid classical theta-series assertion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.9, Eqs. (52)–(53), and Corollary 4.16] The theta series θ_A(τ) = (1/w_K) Σ_{λ∈a⋆} e(N_{K/Q}(λ)/N_a·τ) is asserted to be a holomorphic modular form of weight 0 for Γ0(d_K) with character η on the strength of 'a classical theorem of Hecke.' This is not correct as stated. For a real quadratic K, the norm form has signature (1,1), so a fundamental domain for the unit action contains elements with negative norm. The corresponding terms e(mτ) with m<0 grow exponentially as v=Im τ→∞, so the series does not converge on the upper half-plane. Even when N(ε_K)=+1, the unrestricted fundamental-domain sum contains both positive and negative norm terms. Thus θ_A is not a modular form on H, and the Rankin–Selberg identity Λ(s,f×θ_A) and the derivative identity in Corollary 4.16 are unsupported. The standard convergent real-quadratic theta series has weight 1, not weight 0, and its Rankin–Selberg Gamma factors differ. Since Theorem 4.17 and
  2. [§4.5 and Theorem 4.17] The harmonic weak Maass form f_{0,A} is specified only by its shadow: ξ0(f_{0,A}) = g_{f,A}. The kernel of ξ0 is the infinite-dimensional space of weakly holomorphic forms, so f_{0,A} is far from unique. Theorem 4.15, if valid, would make the combination CT⟨f_{0,A}^+, θ_{L_{A,1}}^+⊗E_{L_{A,2}}⟩ + L'(0,ξ0(f_{0,A}),V_{A,2}) independent of the choice of preimage, but no such invariance is proved. The two terms are not separately invariant under f_{0,A} ↦ f_{0,A}+h with ξ0(h)=0; the proof of Theorem 4.15 does not address the h-dependence. Unless a canonical choice of f_{0,A} is specified (e.g., by growth conditions at the cusps) or invariance of the full expression is proved, the right-hand side of Theorem 4.17 is not well-defined.
  3. [Proof of Theorem 4.17 and Corollary 4.16] The proof of Theorem 4.17 is explicitly labelled 'Formally, this is a consequence' and delegates the key analytic identification to Corollary 4.16, which is the step that breaks because of the invalid θ_A series. The proof of Corollary 4.16 itself relies on formal Dirichlet-series manipulation 'cf. [23, §IV (0.1)]' without checking the convergence of the indefinite theta series or the Gamma factors. A rigorous treatment would need to replace θ_A by a convergent object (such as the nonholomorphic Siegel theta series or a weight-one Hecke theta series) and re-derive the relation between L(s,g_{f,A},V_{A,2}) and Λ(s,Π⊗χ). As written, the central equality Λ′(1/2,Π⊗χ) = ... in Theorem 4.17 is therefore not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and inconsistencies: 'Bruiner' for Bruinier, 'signture', 'disciminant', 'nontrivial automorphisms' (plural), and inconsistent capitalization. These should be corrected.
  2. [Corollary 4.18] The statement says 'inert level N^+' but the hypothesis is on N^-, the product of inert primes. This appears to be a typo.
  3. [Introduction, Theorem 1.2] The theorem is labelled '(Theorem 4.17, Corollary 4.5)' but the referenced result is Corollary 4.18; there is no Corollary 4.5 in the text. Please correct the cross-reference.
  4. [Eq. (54) and surrounding text] The notation f_{0,A,µ}, θ_{L_{A,1},µ_1}, and E_{L_{A,2},µ_2} is introduced abruptly; the congruence condition µ_1+µ_2≡µ mod L_A is not fully defined here, and the reader must reconstruct it from earlier lattice dual-group notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central formula is obtained by a theta-lift/Rankin-Selberg identity chain, not by fitting or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation proceeds by independent identities. Theorem 4.15 expresses the geodesic sum of regularized theta lifts as a constant term plus L'(0, ξ0(f0), V2). Corollary 4.16 identifies the Rankin-Selberg integral L*(s, g, V_A,2) with the base-change L-function Λ(s,Π⊗χ) by unfolding Dirichlet series. Theorem 4.17 combines these two identities algebraically. The central derivative value appears only as the target of an integral representation, not as a fitted parameter or as an input to the theta-lift calculation. The choice of f0 with prescribed shadow ξ0(f0)=g is a well-definedness/ambiguity issue, not a circular reduction: the formula is not derived by assuming the equality it claims. No load-bearing self-citation appears: references to Bruinier, Yang, Kudla, Gross–Zagier, and others are external prior work, not the author's own results invoked to force a conclusion. Section 5's use of BSD is conditional rewriting, not circular. The skeptic's concern about convergence of the weight-zero theta series θ_A is an analytic validity objection to Corollary 4.16, not a demonstration that the claimed equality is equivalent to its inputs. Hence no circularity is established by the paper's own equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem introduces no fitted numerical constants, but it depends on an unspecified choice of f0_A and on a large body of prior results (base change, Siegel-Weil, harmonic weak Maass forms, BSD p-parts). No new particles, forces, or ad hoc objects are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • f0_A (harmonic weak Maass form) = unspecified
    Only the shadow ξ0(f0_A)=g_{f,A} is fixed in §4.5; the holomorphic part / principal part of f0_A is not specified. This is a function choice, not a numerical fit, but it acts as an uncontrolled free choice in the main formula.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Modularity theorem for E/Q (Wiles, Taylor-Wiles, Breuil-Conrad-Diamond-Taylor)
    Used from the start to attach a weight-two newform f to E and to identify L(E,s) with Λ(s-1/2,f).
  • domain assumption Quadratic base change lifting Π=BC_{K/Q}(π) exists and is cuspidal (Langlands, Arthur-Clozel)
    Used in (6), Proposition 2.2 and throughout; Proposition 2.2 gives a proof, but that proof appears to invoke an incorrect cuspidality criterion.
  • standard math Bruinier-Funke surjectivity of ξ0 and existence of harmonic weak Maass forms with prescribed shadow
    Used in §4.5 to choose f0_A; cited to [7] and [50]. The surjectivity is standard, but it does not give uniqueness.
  • standard math Siegel-Weil formula (Kudla, Bruinier-Yang) for the relevant orthogonal spaces
    Used in Corollary 4.14 and Proposition 4.11 to identify geodesic averages with Eisenstein series.
  • ad hoc to paper Ersatz Heegner hypothesis: N^- is the squarefree product of an odd number of primes (Hypothesis 2.1)
    Imposed to force the central L-value to vanish so that the central derivative is the meaningful object. This is a real-quadratic analogue of the Heegner hypothesis, not a standard background fact.
  • domain assumption Refined BSD for analytic rank 0 and 1 up to powers of 2 and 3 (Kato, Kolyvagin, Rohrlich, Skinner-Urban, Jetchev-Skinner-Wan, Skinner-Zhang, Zhang)
    Used in the proof of Theorem 5.1 to turn the main theta-lift identity into an identity of BSD invariants for E and its quadratic twist.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $L$-functions of elliptic curves in ring class extensions of real quadratic fields via regularized theta liftings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QLPDTANC

@misc{pith2026251010277,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $L$-functions of elliptic curves in ring class extensions of real quadratic fields via regularized theta liftings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QLPDTANC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.10277}
}
abstract

We derive new integral presentations for central derivative values of $L$-functions of elliptic curves $E/{\bf{Q}}$ twisted by ring class characters of a real quadratic field $K$ in terms of automorphic Green's functions for certain Hirzebruch-Zagier-like arithmetic divisors on the product of modular curves $X_0(N) \times X_0(N)$ along real geodesic cycles. We also relate these sums to Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer constants and periods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Allen, F

    P. Allen, F. Calegari, A. Caraiani, T. Gee, D. Helm, B. Le Hung, J. Newton, P. Scholze, R. Taylor, and J. Thorne,Potential Automorphy over CM fields, Ann. of Math.197(2023), 897-1113

    2023

  2. [2]

    Andreatta, E.Z

    F. Andreatta, E.Z. Goren, B. Howard, and K. Madapusi Pera,Height pairings on orthogonal Shimura varieties, Compos. Math.153(2017), 474-534

    2017

  3. [3]

    Arthur and L

    J. Arthur and L. Clozel,Simple algebras, base change, and the advanced theory of the trace formula, Ann. of Math. Stud. 120Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ (1989)

    1989

  4. [4]

    Borcherds,Automorphic forms with singularities on Grassmannians, Invent

    R. Borcherds,Automorphic forms with singularities on Grassmannians, Invent. math.132(1998), 491-562

    1998

  5. [5]

    Bruinier,Borcherds products onO(2, l)and Chern classes of Heegner divisors, Springer Lecture Notes in Math.1780, Springer New York (2002)

    J.H. Bruinier,Borcherds products onO(2, l)and Chern classes of Heegner divisors, Springer Lecture Notes in Math.1780, Springer New York (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms

    J.H. Bruiner,Hilbert Modular Forms and Their Applications, in “The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms”, Lectures at a Summer School in Nordfjordeid, Norway, Ed. Ranestad, Springer Universitext 2007

    2007

  7. [7]

    Bruinier and J

    J.H. Bruinier and J. Funke,On two geometric theta lifts, Duke Math. J.125(2004), 45-90

    2004

  8. [8]

    Bruinier and T

    J.H. Bruinier and T. Yang,Faltings heights of CM cycles and derivatives ofL-functions, Invent. math.177(2009), 631-681

    2009

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Burungale, C

    A. Burungale, C. Skinner, and Y. Tian,Elliptic curves and Beilinson-Kato elements: rank one aspects(preprint), 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Burungale, C

    A. Burungale, C. Skinner, and Y. Tian,The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture: a brief survey(preprint), 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Bump,Automorphic Forms and Representations, Cambridge Stud

    D. Bump,Automorphic Forms and Representations, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math.55, Cambridge University Press (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    Castella,On thep-part of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer formula for multiplicative primes, Camb

    F. Castella,On thep-part of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer formula for multiplicative primes, Camb. J. Math6no. 1 (2018), 1-23

    2018

  5. [13]

    Clozel,On the Eisenstein functoriality in cohomology for maximal parabolic subgroups, Selecta Math

    L. Clozel,On the Eisenstein functoriality in cohomology for maximal parabolic subgroups, Selecta Math. (N.S.)28no. 80 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Darmon,Integration onH p × Hand arithmetic applications, Ann

    H. Darmon,Integration onH p × Hand arithmetic applications, Ann. of Math.154(2001), 589-639

    2001

  7. [15]

    Darmon and J

    H. Darmon and J. Vonk,Real Quadratic Borcherds Products, preprint,https://www.math.mcgill.ca/darmon/pub/pub.html

  8. [16]

    Ehlen,CM values of regularized theta lifts and harmonic Maass forms of weight one, Duke Math

    S. Ehlen,CM values of regularized theta lifts and harmonic Maass forms of weight one, Duke Math. J. (13)166(2017), 2447-2519

    2017

  9. [17]

    Freitas, B

    N. Freitas, B. Le Hung, and S. Siksek,Elliptic curves over real quadratic fields are modular, Invent. math.201(2015), 159-206

    2015

  10. [18]

    Gelbart,Weil’s representation and the spectrum of the metaplectic group, Lecture Notes in Math.530, Springer (1976)

    S.S. Gelbart,Weil’s representation and the spectrum of the metaplectic group, Lecture Notes in Math.530, Springer (1976)

    1976

  11. [19]

    Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions

    P. G´ erardin and J.-P. Labesse,The solution of a base change problem forGL(2) , in “Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions”, Pt. 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, Amer. Math. Soc., (1979), 115-133

    1979

  12. [20]

    Goldfeld and J

    D. Goldfeld and J. Hundley,Automorphic Representations andL-Functions for the General Linear Group, Volume I, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math.129, Cambridge University Press (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Gross,Heights and special values ofL-series, CMS Proceedings,7, AMS (1987), 115-187

    B. Gross,Heights and special values ofL-series, CMS Proceedings,7, AMS (1987), 115-187. 42

    1987

  14. [22]

    Gross, W

    B. Gross, W. Kohnen, and D. Zagier,Heegner points and derivatives ofL-series. II, Math. Ann.278(1987), 497-562

    1987

  15. [23]

    Gross and D

    B. Gross and D. Zagier,Heegner points and derivatives ofL-series, Invent. math.84(1986), 225-320

    1986

  16. [24]

    Harris,Arithmetic vector bundles and automorphic forms on Shimura varieties, Invent

    M. Harris,Arithmetic vector bundles and automorphic forms on Shimura varieties, Invent. math.82(1985), 151-189

    1985

  17. [25]

    Harris, K.-W

    M. Harris, K.-W. Lan, R.L. Taylor, and J. Thorne,On the rigid cohomology of certain Shimura varieties, Research in the Mathematical Sciences3(37) (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Howard and K

    B. Howard and K. Madapusi Pera,Arithmetic of Borcherds Products, Ast´ erisque421(2020), 187-297

    2020

  19. [27]

    Howard and T

    B. Howard and T. Yang,Intersections of Hirzebruch-Zagier Divisors and CM Cycles, Lecture Notes in Math.2041, Springer (2012)

  20. [28]

    Jetchev, C

    D. Jetchev, C. Skinner, and X. Wan,The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer formula for elliptic curves of analytic rank one, Camb. J. Math.5no. 3 (2017), 369-434

    2017

  21. [29]

    Katop-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms, Ast´ erisque295(2004), 117-290

    K. Katop-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms, Ast´ erisque295(2004), 117-290

    2004

  22. [30]

    Kolyvagin,Finiteness ofE(Q)andX(E,Q)for a class of Weil curves, Math

    V. Kolyvagin,Finiteness ofE(Q)andX(E,Q)for a class of Weil curves, Math. USSR Izv.32(3) (1989), 523-541

    1989

  23. [31]

    Kontsevich and D.B

    M. Kontsevich and D.B. Zagier,Periods, In Mathematics Unlimited–2001 and Beyond (B. Engquist and W. Schmid, eds.), Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (2001), 771-808

    2001

  24. [32]

    Kudla,Special cycles on Shimura varieties of orthogonal type, Duke Math

    S.S. Kudla,Special cycles on Shimura varieties of orthogonal type, Duke Math. J.86(1997), 39-78

    1997

  25. [33]

    Kudla,Integrals of Borcherds Forms, Compos

    S.S. Kudla,Integrals of Borcherds Forms, Compos. Math.137(2003), 293-349

    2003

  26. [34]

    Kudla,Notes on the local theta correspondence(1996), available atwww.math.utoronto.ca/∼skudla

    S.S. Kudla,Notes on the local theta correspondence(1996), available atwww.math.utoronto.ca/∼skudla

    1996

  27. [35]

    Eisenstein series and applications

    S.S. Kudla,Some Extensions of the Siegel-Weil Formula, in “Eisenstein series and applications”, Eds. W.T. Gan, S.S. Kudla, and Y. Tschinkel, Springer Science & Business Media (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Kudla and J

    S.S. Kudla and J. Millson,Intersection numbers of cycles on locally symmetric spaces and coefficients of holomorphic modular forms in several complex variables, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.71(1990), 121-172

    1990

  29. [37]

    Langlands,Base change forGL(2), Annals of Math

    R. Langlands,Base change forGL(2), Annals of Math. Stud.96, Princeton University Press (1980)

    1980

  30. [38]

    Popa,Central values of RankinL-series over real quadratic fields, Compos

    A. Popa,Central values of RankinL-series over real quadratic fields, Compos. Math.142(2006), 811-866

    2006

  31. [39]

    Rohrlich,OnL-functions of elliptic curves and cyclotomic towers, Invent

    D. Rohrlich,OnL-functions of elliptic curves and cyclotomic towers, Invent. math.75(1984), 409-423

    1984

  32. [40]

    Schofer,Borcherds forms and generalizations of singular moduli, J

    J. Schofer,Borcherds forms and generalizations of singular moduli, J. reine angew. Math.69(2009), 1-36

    2009

  33. [41]

    Scholze,On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties, Ann

    P. Scholze,On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties, Ann. of Math. (2)182(2015) no. 3, 945-1066

    2015

  34. [42]

    Skinner and E

    C. Skinner and E. Urban,The Iwasawa main conjecture forGL(2), Invent. math.195(2014), 1-277

    2014

  35. [43]

    Skinner and W

    C. Skinner and W. Zhang,Indivisibility of Heegner points in the multiplicative case,arxiv:1407.1099

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Str¨ omberg,On liftings of modular forms and Weil representations, Forum Math.36(1) (2024), 33-52

    F. Str¨ omberg,On liftings of modular forms and Weil representations, Forum Math.36(1) (2024), 33-52

    2024

  37. [45]

    Waldspurger,Correspondence de Shimura, J

    J.L. Waldspurger,Correspondence de Shimura, J. Math. Pure Appl.59(1980), 1-113

    1980

  38. [46]

    Waldspurger,Sur les valeurs de certaines fonctionsLautomorphes en leur centre de sym´ etrie, Compos

    J.-L. Waldspurger,Sur les valeurs de certaines fonctionsLautomorphes en leur centre de sym´ etrie, Compos. Math.54 (1985), 173-242

    1985

  39. [47]

    Weil,Sur certains groups d’op´ erateurs unitaires, Acta Math.111(1964), 143-211

    A. Weil,Sur certains groups d’op´ erateurs unitaires, Acta Math.111(1964), 143-211

    1964

  40. [48]

    Yau,Some Function-Theoretic Properties of Complete Riemannian Manifolds and Their Applications to Geometry, Indiana Univ

    S.-T. Yau,Some Function-Theoretic Properties of Complete Riemannian Manifolds and Their Applications to Geometry, Indiana Univ. Math. J.25(1976), 659-670

    1976

  41. [49]

    Yuan, S.-W

    X. Yuan, S.-W. Zhang, and W. Zhang,The Gross-Zagier Formula for Shimura Curves, Ann. of Math. Stud.184, Princeton University Press (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Zhang,An isomorphism between scalar-valued modular forms and modular forms for Weil representations, Ramanujan J.37(2015), 181-201

    Y. Zhang,An isomorphism between scalar-valued modular forms and modular forms for Weil representations, Ramanujan J.37(2015), 181-201

    2015

  43. [51]

    Zhang,Selmer groups and the indivisibility of Heegner points, Camb

    W. Zhang,Selmer groups and the indivisibility of Heegner points, Camb. J. Math.2no. 2 (2014), 191-253. Email address:vanorder@puc-rio.br Departamento de Matem´atica, Pontif´ıcia Universidade Cat´olica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) 43

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.