pith. sign in

arxiv: 1804.03277 · v1 · pith:QMCT6JFSnew · submitted 2018-04-09 · 🧮 math.PR · math.CO

Identifiability for graphexes and the weak kernel metric

classification 🧮 math.PR math.CO
keywords graphexesmetricgraphconvergesestablishidentifiabilityprocessesrandom
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In two recent papers by Veitch and Roy and by Borgs, Chayes, Cohn, and Holden, a new class of sparse random graph processes based on the concept of graphexes over $\sigma$-finite measure spaces has been introduced. In this paper, we introduce a metric for graphexes that generalizes the cut metric for the graphons of the dense theory of graph convergence. We show that a sequence of graphexes converges in this metric if and only if the sequence of graph processes generated by the graphexes converges in distribution. In the course of the proof, we establish a regularity lemma and determine which sets of graphexes are precompact under our metric. Finally, we establish an identifiability theorem, characterizing when two graphexes are equivalent in the sense that they lead to the same process of random graphs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Limits of Sparse Configuration Models and Beyond: Graphexes and Multi-Graphexes

    math.PR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The paper establishes sampling convergence of the configuration model, preferential attachment model, generalized random graph, and bipartite configuration model to graphexes, giving necessary and sufficient condition...

  2. A correction to Kallenberg's theorem for jointly exchangeable random measures

    math.PR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper corrects Kallenberg's theorem by adding a missing condition for local finiteness of jointly exchangeable random measures and provides a counterexample showing the original statement is incomplete.