Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Mild and classical solutions for fractional evolution differential equation

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a Hilfer-type fractional functional evolution equation with nonlocal conditions in a Banach space, the paper proves existence and uniqueness of a mild solution under a Lipschitz condition and a smallness bound, and of a classical…

desk verdict A plausible extension of the authors' Hilfer-evolution framework to functional delays and nonlocal conditions, but the proofs of the two main theorems do not hold together as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04948 v2 pith:QNAANIFA submitted 2019-08-14 math.CA

J. Vanterler da C. Sousa , Thabet Abdeljawad , D. S. Oliveira This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CA MSC 26A3334A0834A1234G2047Dxx
keywords HilferfractionalderivativemildsolutionclassicalevolutionequationnonlocalconditionresolventoperatorfunctionBanachcontractiontheoremGronwallinequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a fractional functional evolution equation driven by the Hilfer derivative of order $0<\alpha\le 1$ and type $0\le\beta\le1$, with a nonlocal condition of the form $I_{t_0^+}^{1-\gamma}u(t_0^+)+\sum_{k=1}^p C_k I_{t_0^+}^{1-\gamma}u(t_k)=u_0$ in a Banach space, has a unique mild solution whenever the nonlinearity is Lipschitz and the quantity $(r+1)MLa^2(1+M\|\mathcal{B}\|\tilde{C}\sum_{k=1}^p |C_k|)$ is smaller than $1$. It also tries to prove that, under a domain condition on $\mathcal{B}u_0$ and on the nonlocal convolution terms, this solution is classical. A sympathetic reader would care because the two-parameter Hilfer derivative unifies Riemann-Liouville and Caputo-type fractional derivatives as particular cases, so the result covers a whole family of evolution equations at once. The argument rests on converting the problem into a fixed-point equation, applying the Banach contraction theorem, and upgrading regularity with a Gronwall inequality.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $\beta$-times integrated $\alpha$-resolvent operator function $S_{\alpha,\beta}(t)$, a strongly continuous commuting family of bounded operators generated by $-A$ that satisfies a resolvent-type functional equation; it plays the role of the semigroup for this fractional setting. The other essential piece is the operator $\mathcal{B}$, which encodes the nonlocal condition and appears wherever the initial datum $u_0$ enters the solution formula. The solution is assembled from $S_{\alpha,\beta}(t-t_0)\mathcal{B}u_0$ plus a convolution with the kernel $K_\alpha(t)=t^{\alpha-1}G_\alpha(t)$, where $G_\alpha$ is built from the generator through the resolvent operator. In Theorem 3.1 the contraction estimate measures differences in the weighted space $C_{1-\gamma}(J,\Omega)$ with norm $\|u\|=\sup_t t^{1-\gamma}\|u(t)\|$; in Theorem 4.2 the regularity upgrade is carried by the Gronwall inequality together with the Mittag-Leffler bound it produces.

What would settle it

Take a concrete generator $-A$ (for example $A$ a multiplication operator or the Laplacian on a bounded domain), choose nonlocal coefficients $C_k$ and times $t_k$, and compute numerically or symbolically the spectrum of $\sum_{k=1}^p C_k I_{t_0^+}^{1-\gamma}S_{\alpha,\beta}(t_k-t_0)$; if $-1$ is an eigenvalue, $\mathcal{B}$ does not exist and the solution formula (2.6) is undefined. To test Theorem 4.2, find a Lipschitz $f$ satisfying the smallness condition and data satisfying the domain condition, and check whether the mild solution is genuinely continuously differentiable on $J\setminus\{t_0\}$; failure of this regularity would falsify the classical-solution claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the nonlocal Hilfer Cauchy problem (1.1)-(1.2) admits a unique mild solution given explicitly by the integral equation (2.6), in which the initial value is transformed by the operator $\mathcal{B}=(I+\sum_{k=1}^p C_k I_{t_0^+}^{1-\gamma}S_{\alpha,\beta}(t_k-t_0))^{-1}$ to satisfy the nonlocal condition. The fixed-point map in (3.2) is shown to be a contraction under the stated smallness bound, so Banach's theorem supplies the unique solution. Theorem 4.2 then shows that if $\mathcal{B}u_0$ and the nonlocal integral terms lie in the domain of the generator $A$, the mild solution is continuously differentiable on $J\setminus\{t_0\}$ and satisfies the equation pointwise, hence is the unique classical solution.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes, with no sufficient condition supplied, that the operator $\mathcal{B}=(I+\sum_{k=1}^p C_k I_{t_0^+}^{1-\gamma}S_{\alpha,\beta}(t_k-t_0))^{-1}$ exists and is bounded on $\Omega$; if $\mathcal{B}$ fails to be bounded, the integral equation defining the mild solution is undefined and the main theorems do not go through.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A unique mild solution exists whenever the Lipschitz constant, the interval length, and the nonlocal coefficients are small enough, with the smallness condition stated explicitly in terms of the resolvent bound $M$, the norm of $\mathcal{B}$, and $\sum |C_k|$.
  • The two-parameter limits $\beta\to1$ and $\beta\to0$ recover Caputo-type and Riemann-Liouville-type fractional evolution equations, so the existence and uniqueness results transfer to those cases as well.
  • If the data satisfy the domain condition $\mathcal{B}u_0\in D(A)$ and the nonlocal convolution terms lie in $D(A)$, the unique solution is not merely integral but is differentiable on the open interval, which is exactly the classical regularity one hopes for.
  • The fixed-point formulation gives an explicit iteration scheme whose contraction constant controls the error, so the proof itself suggests how to approximate the solution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper assumes rather than proves the boundedness of $\mathcal{B}$; a natural extension, not taken up here, is to derive a sufficient smallness condition on $\sum|C_k|$ that guarantees $\mathcal{B}$ is bounded and makes the existence theorem fully self-contained.
  • Because the technique uses a resolvent operator rather than a semigroup, the same contraction-plus-Gronwall strategy may export to fractional equations whose generator is not densely defined, provided a resolvent operator of this type exists.
  • The theory is local in time since the contraction constant grows with $a$; a global-in-time result would need a different argument, for instance a priori bounds or a Lyapunov function, and the paper does not address that case.
  • Once an inverse Laplace transform with respect to a general function $\psi$ becomes available, the method is likely to extend directly to $\psi$-Hilfer derivatives, the open direction the concluding remarks point to.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the fractional functional evolution equation with Hilfer derivative (1.1) and nonlocal condition (1.2) in a Banach space. The authors define a mild solution through the integral equation (2.6), which involves a β-times integrated α-resolvent operator family, and prove existence and uniqueness of mild solutions via the Banach contraction principle (Theorem 3.1). They then prove that, under additional assumptions, this solution is classical (Theorem 4.2), using a Gronwall inequality argument. The paper also includes a theorem (Theorem 4.1) asserting that classical solutions are mild. The main results depend on a representation formula (Theorem 2.4) quoted from the authors' earlier work.

Significance. If the results were correct, they would constitute a useful existence and uniqueness theory for Hilfer-type fractional functional evolution equations with nonlocal conditions, extending earlier work on mild and classical solutions. The problem is well chosen and the use of resolvent operator families is appropriate. However, the proofs as written contain severe gaps: the contraction estimate in Theorem 3.1 is not a valid estimate in the weighted space, a central constant is undefined, a singular kernel is bounded by an unrelated resolvent bound, the existence of the operator B is assumed without any sufficient condition, and the difference estimate in Theorem 4.2 omits a necessary term. These are not presentation issues; they invalidate the central claims. The paper provides no machine-checked proofs or reproducible computations that would mitigate these gaps.

major comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 3.1, proof leading to Eq. (3.3)] The contraction estimate does not establish a contraction in X = C_{1-γ}(J,Ω). The proof bounds the unweighted pointwise norm ||(Fω)(t) - (F~ω)(t)|| and then directly concludes ||Fω - F~ω||_{C_{1-γ}} ≤ ~q ||ω - ~ω||_{C_{1-γ}}. To pass from a pointwise bound to the weighted norm one must multiply by t^{1-γ} and take a supremum, which changes the constant; moreover the same weighted norm ||·||_{C_{1-γ}} is used in the Lipschitz condition (3.1) for pointwise values f(s,z_0,...,z_r), although the pointwise difference ||ω(s)-~ω(s)|| can be as large as s^{-(1-γ)} ||ω-~ω||_{C_{1-γ}}. Consequently inequality (3.3) does not follow from the displayed chain.
  2. [Theorem 3.1, Assumption 2 and proof] The constant ~C in Assumption 2 and in the bound for ||I_{t0+}^{1-γ}|| is never defined anywhere in the manuscript. In addition, the proof bounds ∫_{t0}^{t} ||K_α(t-s)|| ds by M(t-t0), where M = sup_{t∈[0,a]} ||S_{α,β}(t)||, but K_α(t)=t^{α-1}G_α(t) is a different, singular kernel and no estimate for its integral is supplied. The correct order of magnitude for this integral is (t-t0)^α, not (t-t0), so the factor a^2 in the contraction condition is unjustified. These problems already occur when p=0 and B=I, so they are independent of the nonlocal condition.
  3. [Section 2, definition of the operator B] The paper assumes the existence of a bounded inverse B = (I + Σ_{k=1}^p C_k I_{t0+}^{1-γ} S_{α,β}(t_k-t0))^{-1} on Ω without giving any sufficient condition, such as smallness of Σ |C_k| ||I_{t0+}^{1-γ} S_{α,β}(t_k-t0)||. Since B appears in the mild solution formula (2.6) and in the classical solution proof, the integral equation defining the solution is not well-posed under the stated hypotheses. A concrete condition ensuring the Neumann series converges is needed.
  4. [Theorem 4.2, Eq. (4.9)] The difference u(t+h)-u(t) is not expanded correctly. The correct expansion contains the term ∫_{t0}^{t} [K_α(t+h-s) - K_α(t-s)] f(s,u(s),u(b_1(s)),...,u(b_r(s))) ds, which is absent from Eq. (4.9). As a result, the subsequent estimate (4.10) and the Gronwall argument (4.11)-(4.12) do not follow. Furthermore, the bound ∫_{t0}^{t+h} ||K_α(t+h-s)|| ds ≤ Mh used in (4.10) repeats the unproved kernel estimate from Theorem 3.1. Together these issues invalidate the conclusion that u is classical.
  5. [Theorem 2.4 and the representation formula] The central representation formula (2.6) and the underlying linear Cauchy-problem result (Theorem 2.4) are taken from the authors' own arXiv preprints [43,44] without proof or independent verification in this paper. Because both main theorems depend on this formula, the paper should either include a proof of Theorem 2.4 or cite a peer-reviewed, accessible source. As written, the self-reliance on unpublished preprints makes the foundation of the results difficult to verify.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'the β-times integrated β-times integrated α-resolvent operator function' repeats 'β-times integrated' and should be corrected.
  2. [Preliminaries, definition of C_{1-γ}] The definition of C_{1-γ}(J',Ω) writes 'ψ ∈ C(J',Ω)' but then uses u in 't^{1-γ}u(t) ∈ C(J',Ω)', and the norm symbol ||·||_{C_{1-γ}} is used both for the norm on Ω and for the norm on the function space X. This dual use is confusing and should be disambiguated.
  3. [Section 2, definition of B] The sentence 'we shall assume that there exists the operator B with (B) = Ω' should read 'with D(B) = Ω'; the domain notation is missing.
  4. [Theorem 4.2, statement and proof] The hypotheses are numbered 1, 2, 3, and then a fourth item '4. Then the fractional functional differential...' is actually part of the conclusion, not a hypothesis. In the proof, 'condition 4' is used to refer to Eq. (4.6), which is not a numbered condition, making the reference unclear.
  5. [Theorem 4.2, Eq. (4.5)] The Lipschitz condition in Eq. (4.5) is missing a closing norm sign in ||f(s,z_0,...,z_r) - f(s,z̄_0,...,z̄_r||, and the notation for z̄_i is inconsistent with the rest of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The central representation formula and a key Gronwall lemma are imported from the authors' own earlier work without proof; the fixed-point argument itself is otherwise a standard application.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2, Theorem 2.4, and the definition of mild solution after Eq. (2.6)]
    "Theorem 2.4 Let y : J → Ω be Lipschitz continuous on J and x ∈ D(A). Then, the Cauchy problem Eq.(2.5) has exactly one classical solution, denoted by u, given by the formula u(t) = Sα,β (t − t0)x + ∫_{t0+}^{t} Kα (t − s)y(s) ds, t ∈ J."

    This representation theorem is the foundation of the mild-solution integral equation (2.6) used in Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.1. The paper does not prove Theorem 2.4; the surrounding text only says 'For more details see [43, 44] and references therein,' and [43] and [44] are earlier papers by the same research group. Thus the main existence result is a Banach fixed-point argument applied to an imported, self-cited representation formula rather than a derivation from the differential equation. If that imported representation is accepted, the remaining contraction argument is standard; if it is not, the main theorem has no independent support inside this paper.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 2, Lemma 2.3, used in Section 4, Eq. (4.12)]
    "Lemma 2.3 [37] (Gronwall lemma) Under the hypotheses of Theorem 2.2, let v be a nondecreasing function on Ω. Then, we have u(t) ≤ v(t)Eµ(g(t)Γ(µ)[(ψ(t) − ψ(a))µ]) t ∈ Ω, where Eµ(·) is the Mittag-Leffler function with one parameter."

    Theorem 4.2 uses this Gronwall lemma to pass from inequality (4.11) to the Mittag-Leffler bound in (4.12), which is the step that shows the mild solution is continuous and hence classical. The lemma is cited to [37], a prior paper by Sousa and de Oliveira, the same group as the present authors. This makes the classical-solution uniqueness proof partially dependent on a self-cited fractional Gronwall inequality; the paper does not re-derive the version it applies here.

full rationale

The fixed-point argument in Theorem 3.1 is a standard Banach contraction application to the integral equation (2.6), and the algebra in Remark 2.5 showing that (2.6) implies the nonlocal condition (1.2) is not circular. The circularity burden is instead that the mild-solution representation itself is not derived in this paper: Theorem 2.4 is asserted without proof, and the text refers to [43,44], both previous papers by the same group, for the representation. Similarly, the fractional Gronwall lemma used to prove classicality in Theorem 4.2 is cited to [37], another paper by the same group. These are load-bearing because the existence theorem is exactly a fixed-point theorem for the imported integral equation and the classicality proof relies on the imported Gronwall bound. The skeptical objections about the contraction proof, such as the weighted/unweighted norm mismatch and the missing bound for the singular kernel Kα, are correctness defects rather than circularity, so they do not raise the circularity score further. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no benchmark comparison that would make the derivation circular by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theorems rest on an imported resolvent representation, an assumed inverse operator, and unproved bounds on the resolvent kernel. The paper does not supply machine-checked proofs or independent verification, and several of these ingredients are from the authors' own prior preprints.

free parameters (1)
  • ~C
    Appears in the contraction condition (Theorem 3.1, hypothesis 2) as a bound for I^{1-gamma} and in the estimate of Theorem 4.2, but is never defined or derived in the paper.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Theorem 2.4: the linear Cauchy problem (2.5) has a unique classical solution given by u(t)=S_{alpha,beta}(t-t0)x+int K_alpha(t-s)y(s)ds when y is Lipschitz and x in D(A).
    Stated without proof and attributed to the authors' own prior arXiv preprints [43,44]; the representation is the foundation for the mild solution definition.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of the bounded inverse B=(I+sum C_k I_{0+}^{1-gamma} S_{alpha,beta}(t_k-t0))^{-1} on Omega.
    Assumed in Section 2 with no sufficient condition; without it the nonlocal condition cannot be encoded.
  • ad hoc to paper The kernel K_alpha and resolvent S_{alpha,beta} satisfy the pointwise bounds used in the estimates, including ||K_alpha(t)|| <= M and Lipschitz continuity of t -> S_{alpha,beta}(t).
    Used in Eq (4.10) and the contraction estimate, but only boundedness of S_{alpha,beta} was stated; the singular K_alpha estimate and Lipschitz continuity are not proved.
  • standard math Gronwall inequality Lemma 2.3 from [37] is applicable to the estimate (4.11).
    The cited inequality is standard, but its hypotheses are not checked for the transformed estimate; the preceding inequality (4.11) is not of the required form.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mild and classical solutions for fractional evolution differential equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QNAANIFA

@misc{pith2026190804948,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mild and classical solutions for fractional evolution differential equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QNAANIFA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04948}
}
abstract

Investigating the existence, uniqueness, stability, continuous dependence of data among other properties of solutions of fractional differential equations, has been the object of study by an important range of researchers in the scientific community, especially in fractional calculus. And over the years, these properties have been investigated more vehemently, as they enable more general and new results. In this paper, we investigate the existence and uniqueness of a class of mild and classical solutions of the fractional evolution differential equation in the Banach space $\Omega$. To obtain such results, we use fundamental tools, namely: Banach contraction theorem, Gronwall inequality and the $\beta$-times integrated $\beta$-times integrated $\alpha$-resolvent operator function of an $(\alpha,\beta)$-resolvent operator function.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abdeljawad, T., Atangana, A., G´ omez-Aguilar, J. F., Jarad, F., O n a more general frac- tional integration by parts formulae and applications, Physica A: St atistical Mechanics and its Applications, 122494, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.p hysa.2019.122494

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    M., Jarad, F., Fractional logistic mode ls in the frame of fractional operators generated by conformable derivatives, Ch aos, Solitons and Fractals, 119, (2019) 94–101

    Abdeljawad, T., Al-Mdallal, Q. M., Jarad, F., Fractional logistic mode ls in the frame of fractional operators generated by conformable derivatives, Ch aos, Solitons and Fractals, 119, (2019) 94–101

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Acay, B., Bas, E., Abdeljawad, T., Nonlocal fractional calculus fr om different viewpoint point generated by truncated M-derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Mat h., 366 (2020) 112410. http://doi.org.101016/j.cam.2019.112410

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Adjabi, Y.; Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T., On Generalized Fractional O perators and a Gron- wall Type Inequality with Applications, FILOMAT, 31(17) (2017) 545 7–5473

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Value Probl., 2018(1) (2018) 157

    Al-Omari, A and Al-Saadi, H, Existence of the classical and strong solutions for fractional semilinear initial value problems, Bound. Value Probl., 2018(1) (2018) 157. 14

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Almeida, R., Bastos, N. R. O., Monteiro, M. T. T., A fractional Malth usian growth model with variable order using an optimization approach, Statistics, Opti. & Info. Comput., 6(1) (2018) 4–11

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Almeida, R., Bastos, N. R. O., Monteiro, M. T. T., Modeling some real phenomena by fractional differential equations, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 39(16) ( 2016) 4846–4855

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Baba, Isa Abdullahi, A fractional-order bladder cancer model wit h BCG treatment effect, Comput. Appl. Math., 38(2) (2019) 37

    work page 2019

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Byszewski, L., Winiarska, T., On nonlocal evolution problem for the equation of the first order, Czasopismo Techniczne, 2013 (4) (2013) 19–26

    2013

  2. [10]

    Chen, C., Li, M., On fractional resolvent operator functions, S emigroup Forum, 80(1) (2010) 121–142

    2010

  3. [11]

    Dong, X., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., On nonlocal problems for fractiona l differential equations in Banach spaces, Opuscula Mathematica, 31 (3) (2011) 341–357

    2011

  4. [12]

    and Sharma, M., Solutions to fractional functional d ifferential equations with nonlocal conditions, Frac

    Dubey, S. and Sharma, M., Solutions to fractional functional d ifferential equations with nonlocal conditions, Frac. Cal. Appl. Anal., 17(3) (2014) 654–673

    2014

  5. [13]

    Debbouche, A., Fractional evolution integro-differential syst ems with nonlocal conditions, Adv. Dyn. Sys. Appl., 5(1) (2010) 49–60

    2010

  6. [14]

    Fan, Z., Existence and regularity of solutions for evolution equa tions with Riemann– Liouville fractional derivatives, Indagationes Mathematicae, 25(3 ) (2014) 516–524

    2014

  7. [15]

    Nonlinear Sci

    Frunzo, L., Garra, R., Giusti, A., Luongo, V., Modeling biological sy stems with an im- proved fractional Gompertz law, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Sim ul., 74 (2019) 260– 267

    2019

  8. [16]

    Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Generalized fractional derivatives a nd Laplace transform, Dis- crete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, (2019) 1775–1786

    2019

  9. [17]

    Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., A modified Laplace transform for cer tain generalized fractional operators , Results in Nonlinear Analysis, 1(2) (2018), 88–98

    2018

  10. [18]

    Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Alzabut, J., Generalized fractional d erivatives generated by a class of local proportional derivatives, Eur. Phys. J. Special To pics, 226(16-18) (2017) 3457–3471

    2017

  11. [19]

    Gu, H., Zhou, Y., Ahmad, B., Alsaedi, A., Integral solutions of fra ctional evolution equa- tions with nondense domain, Elec. J. Diff. Equ., 2017(145) (2017) 1– 15

    2017

  12. [20]

    Gambo, Y.Y., Ameen, R., Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Existence and uniqueness of solutions to fractional differential equations in the frame of generalized Cap uto fractional derivatives, Adv. Diff. Equ. 2018 2018:134

    2018

  13. [21]

    Nonlinear Sci

    Guo, Q., Sun, Z., Xu, Wei., Bifurcations in a fractional birhythmic b iological system with time delay, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 72 (2019) 318–328

    2019

  14. [22]

    H., Suzuki, T., Existence and uniqueness of mild solu tions for fractional semilinear differential equations, Elect

    Guswanto, B. H., Suzuki, T., Existence and uniqueness of mild solu tions for fractional semilinear differential equations, Elect. J. Diff. Equ., 2015(168) (20 15) 1–16. 15

    2015

  15. [23]

    M., Zafar, A

    Ghalib, M. M., Zafar, A. A., Hammouch, Z. Riaz, M. B., Shabbir, K., A nalytical results on the unsteady rotational flow of fractional-order non-Newton ian fluids with shear stress on the boundary,Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, (20 19) 688–706

  16. [24]

    Hern´ andez, E., ORegan, D., Balachandran, K., Existence resu lts for abstract fractional differential equations with nonlocal conditions via resolvent operat ors, Indagationes math- ematicae, 24(1) (2013) 68–82

    2013

  17. [25]

    Heydari, Mohammad Hossein and Avazzadeh, Zakieh and Yang, Y in, A computational method for solving variable-order fractional nonlinear diffusion-wa ve equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 352 (2019) 235–248

    2019

  18. [26]

    Nonlinear Sc i

    Katatbeh, Q., Al-Omari, A., Existence and uniqueness of mild and c lassical solutions to fractional order Hadamard-type Cauchy problem, J. Nonlinear Sc i. Appl., 9 (2016) 827– 835

    2016

  19. [27]

    Li, K., Peng, J., Jia, J., Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions f or abstract delay fractional differential equations, Comput. & Math. Appl., 62(3) (2 011) 1398–1404

  20. [28]

    Li, K., Peng, J., Jia, J., Cauchy problems for fractional different ial equations with Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives, J. Func. Anal., 263(2) (20 12) 476–510

  21. [29]

    M., Existence and uniqueness of mild solution for fractional inte- grodifferential equations, Adv

    Li, F., N’Gu´ er´ ekata, G. M., Existence and uniqueness of mild solution for fractional inte- grodifferential equations, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2012(1) (2012) 158789

    2012

  22. [30]

    J., Pourhadi, E., On the attractivity of solu tions for a class of multi- term fractional functional differential equations, J

    Losada, J., Nieto, J. J., Pourhadi, E., On the attractivity of solu tions for a class of multi- term fractional functional differential equations, J. Comput. Ap pl. Math., 312 (2017) 2–12

    2017

  23. [31]

    S., de Oliveira, E

    Oliveira, D. S., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, Hilfer-Katugampola fractio nal derivatives, Com- putational and Applied Mathematics, 37(3) (2018) 3672–3690

    2018

  24. [32]

    M., Atangana, A., Computational study of multi-spec ies fractional reaction- diffusion system with ABC operator, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 128 (2018) 280–289

    Owolabi, K. M., Atangana, A., Computational study of multi-spec ies fractional reaction- diffusion system with ABC operator, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 128 (2018) 280–289

    2018

  25. [33]

    G., Kilbas, A

    Samko, S. G., Kilbas, A. A. and Marichev, O. I., Fractional integr als and derivatives, 1993 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Yverdon Yverdon-les-Bain s, Switzerland

    1993

  26. [34]

    Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, On the ψ -Hilfer fractional derivative, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 60 (2018) 72–91

    2018

  27. [35]

    Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, Leibniz type ru le: ψ -Hilfer fractional operator, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 77 (2019) 305–311

    2019

  28. [36]

    Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, Ulam–Hyers st ability of a nonlinear fractional Volterra integro-differential equation, Appl. Math. Le tt., 81 (2018) 50–56

    2018

  29. [37]

    Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, A Gronwall ineq uality and the Cauchy- type problem by means of Hilfer operator, Diff. Equ. & Appl., 11(1) (2 019) 87–106

  30. [38]

    Vanterler da C., Kucche, K

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., Kucche, K. D., De Oliveira, E. Capelas, Stability of ψ -Hilfer impulsive fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 88 (2 019) 73–80

  31. [39]

    Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, On the Ψ-frac tional integral and appli- cations, Comput Appl. Math., 38(1) (2019) 4. 16

    2019

  32. [40]

    Vanterler da C., dos Santos, M

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., dos Santos, M. N. N., Magna, L. A., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, Validation of a fractional model for erythrocyte sedimentation ra te, Comput. Appl. Math., 37(5) (2018) 6903–6919

    2018

  33. [41]

    Vanterler da C., Magna, L

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., Magna, L. A., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, F ractional calculus and the ESR test, AIMS Math., 2(4) (2017) 692–705

    2017

  34. [42]

    Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., de Oliveira, E. Capelas, Fractional or der pseudoparabolic partial differential equation: Ulam–Hyers stability, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc., N ew Series, 50(2) (2019) 481–496

    2019

  35. [43]

    Vanterler da C., Tavares, L

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., Tavares, L. S. and de Oliveira, E. Cap elas, Mild and strong solutions for Hilfer evolution equation, arXiv:1907.02019, (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Vanterler da C., Gomes, D

    Sousa, J. Vanterler da C., Gomes, D. F. and de Oliveira, E. Capela s, A new class of mild and strong solutions of integro-differential equation of arbitrary order in Banach space, arXiv:1812.11197 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    M., Kumar, D., Singh, J

    Srivastava, H. M., Kumar, D., Singh, J. An efficient analytical tec hnique for fractional model of vibration equation, Appl. Math. Model., 45 (2017) 192–204

    2017

  38. [46]

    and Wang, Q., The existence and uniqueness of mild solu tions for fractional differential equations with nonlocal conditions of order 1 < α < 2, Comput

    Shu, X.-B. and Wang, Q., The existence and uniqueness of mild solu tions for fractional differential equations with nonlocal conditions of order 1 < α < 2, Comput. & Math. Appl., 64(6) (2012) 2100–2110

    2012

  39. [47]

    Zafar, Zain Ul Abadin, Fractional order Lengyel–Epstein chem ical reaction model, Comput. Appl. Math., 38(3) (2019) 131

    2019

  40. [48]

    Zhang, X., Huang, X., Liu, Z., The existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for impulsive fractional equations with nonlocal conditions and infinite delay, Non linear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 4(4) (2010) 775–781

    2010

  41. [49]

    Zhang, Z., Liu, B., Existence of mild solutions for fractional evolu tion equations, J. Frac. Cal. Appl., 2(20) (2012) 1–10

    2012

  42. [50]

    Zhang, Z., Ning, Q., Wang, H., Mild solutions of fractional evolution equations on an unbounded interval, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2014(1) (2014) 27

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.