pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21053 · v1 · pith:QNADTFSDnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 💻 cs.RO

Perception of Social Robots as Communication Partners in Healthcare for Older Adults

Hana Yamamoto , Carlotta Julia Mayer , Charlotte Raithel , Theresa Buchner , Christian Werner , Yasuhisa Hirata , Monika Eckstein , Katja Mombaur This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords social robotsolder adultshuman-robot interactionhealthcarestress levelscaregiver burdenfacial expression analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Social robots interact with older adults in healthcare without causing more stress than humans do.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether social robots can function as reliable communication partners for older adults during structured healthcare tasks such as health-sensing surveys. A study with 35 participants aged 70 and older compared robot-led and human-led sessions using facial expression analysis, heart rate variability, and questionnaires. No significant differences emerged in overall stress levels, while facial data showed the robot was accepted as a valid partner and heart rate readings suggested greater relaxation with the robot. These outcomes point to robots handling routine interactions to ease pressure on human caregivers. The authors also flag an appearance-content mismatch in current robot designs as a remaining barrier to fully natural exchanges.

Core claim

In a comparative study, interactions with a social robot produced no significant differences in overall stress levels compared to human interactions, as measured by multi-modal data including facial expression analysis, heart rate variability, and subjective questionnaires. The robot was accepted as a valid interaction partner, with physiological data indicating a more relaxed state during robot sessions. These findings indicate that social robots can engage older adults without inducing psychological strain and are capable of alleviating caregiver burden by performing structured tasks such as health-sensing surveys.

What carries the argument

Multi-modal measurement protocol that combines facial expression analysis, heart rate variability tracking, and questionnaires to compare psychological and physiological responses in human versus robot interaction conditions.

If this is right

  • Robots can carry out routine health-sensing surveys with older adults at stress levels comparable to those produced by human caregivers.
  • Delegation of structured tasks to robots offers a practical route to reducing overall caregiver workload in healthcare settings.
  • Positive prompts appear to improve engagement outcomes in both human and robot conditions in similar ways.
  • Addressing the appearance-content mismatch in robot design would support more fluid and accepted future interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Routine robot use in care facilities could increase the frequency of health checks for older adults living alone without raising their stress.
  • The observed relaxation response to robots may support wider technology adoption among aging groups facing caregiver shortages.
  • Long-term field trials outside laboratory conditions would clarify whether these short-session benefits persist over repeated daily use.

Load-bearing premise

The interaction protocols, positive prompts, and measurement tools yield directly comparable results across human and robot conditions without systematic bias from the experimental setting or participant expectations.

What would settle it

A larger replication study that records significantly higher stress indicators such as elevated heart rates or more negative facial expressions specifically during robot sessions would undermine the equivalence claim.

read the original abstract

Addressing the global caregiver shortage through socially assistive robots necessitates a deep understanding of their psychological and physiological impacts on older adults during human-robot interaction (HRI). This study addresses whether social robots can serve as effective interaction partners compared to humans, and if "positive prompts" can similarly enhance these interactions. We conducted a comparative study with 35 participants (aged 70+). Our multi-modal analysis, integrating facial expression data, heart rate variability, and subjective questionnaires, revealed no significant differences in overall stress levels between human and robot interactions. Facial expression analysis confirmed that the robot was accepted as a valid interaction partner, while physiological data showed slightly lower heart rates during robot interactions, suggesting a more relaxed state compared to human-led sessions. These findings indicate that social robots can engage older adults without inducing psychological strain and are capable of alleviating caregiver burden by performing structured tasks, such as health-sensing surveys. Future work should address the identified "appearance-content mismatch" in robot design to facilitate even more natural and effective interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a comparative study with 35 participants aged 70+ examining stress during human versus social robot interactions in a healthcare setting. Multi-modal measures (facial expression analysis, heart rate variability, and questionnaires) show no significant overall stress differences and slightly lower heart rates with robots. The authors conclude that social robots can engage older adults without psychological strain and are capable of alleviating caregiver burden by performing structured tasks such as health-sensing surveys.

Significance. If the core empirical comparison holds, the work provides useful evidence that social robots can serve as acceptable interaction partners for older adults without elevating stress relative to humans. The multi-modal measurement approach is a strength. However, the broader claim of caregiver burden alleviation rests on inference rather than direct measurement, limiting immediate translational impact.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The claim that social robots 'are capable of alleviating caregiver burden by performing structured tasks, such as health-sensing surveys' extrapolates beyond the reported data. The experiment compares stress indicators between human and robot conditions but includes no caregiver burden instruments, task completion metrics, replacement-effect measures, or workload assessments.
  2. Results (stress comparison): The statement of 'no significant differences in overall stress levels' is presented without statistical details such as p-values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, error bars, or sample-size justification. This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the robustness of the null result or rule out confounds such as order effects and novelty bias.
minor comments (2)
  1. Methods: Provide explicit details on how the interaction protocols, positive prompts, and multi-modal tools were kept equivalent across human and robot conditions to allow assessment of systematic bias.
  2. Discussion: Address the 'appearance-content mismatch' limitation with concrete suggestions for robot design improvements rather than leaving it as a general future-work item.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. We address each major comment below and agree that revisions are needed to strengthen the manuscript. All changes will be incorporated in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The claim that social robots 'are capable of alleviating caregiver burden by performing structured tasks, such as health-sensing surveys' extrapolates beyond the reported data. The experiment compares stress indicators between human and robot conditions but includes no caregiver burden instruments, task completion metrics, replacement-effect measures, or workload assessments.

    Authors: We agree that this claim in the abstract extends beyond the direct empirical scope of the study. The experiment focused on multi-modal stress and acceptance measures during interactions and did not include instruments for caregiver burden, task performance metrics, or replacement effects. In the revision, we will remove the extrapolative statement from the abstract. The Discussion section will retain a qualified mention of potential implications for caregiver burden, clearly framed as an inference rather than a direct finding. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results (stress comparison): The statement of 'no significant differences in overall stress levels' is presented without statistical details such as p-values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, error bars, or sample-size justification. This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the robustness of the null result or rule out confounds such as order effects and novelty bias.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for fuller statistical transparency. The revised Results section will report p-values, effect sizes (e.g., Cohen’s d), confidence intervals, and error bars for all stress comparisons. We will add a sample-size justification drawing on prior HRI literature and power considerations for the observed effects. Regarding confounds, the study used a within-subjects design with counterbalanced order of conditions; we will explicitly describe this and discuss novelty bias as a limitation, including any post-hoc checks or caveats on generalizability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical comparative study with direct measurements; no derivation chain present

full rationale

The paper reports results from a controlled comparative experiment with 35 participants using multi-modal data collection (facial expression analysis, heart rate variability, and questionnaires) to assess stress and acceptance during human versus robot interactions. No equations, models, parameter fittings, or derivations are described that could reduce to prior inputs by construction. Claims follow from the observed data without self-definitional loops, fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The study is self-contained against its own empirical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in HRI research about the validity of physiological and facial measures for detecting stress and acceptance; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Facial expression analysis, heart rate variability, and questionnaires validly and comparably capture psychological and physiological impacts across human and robot conditions.
    Invoked when interpreting no significant stress differences and lower heart rates as evidence of robot acceptance and relaxed state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1196 out tokens · 35256 ms · 2026-05-21T04:25:47.757200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    eISBN: 9789211065138

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Population Prospects 2024: Sum- mary of Results (Advance Unedited Version). eISBN: 9789211065138

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/ Pressemitteilungen/2024/12/PD24_478 _224.html

    Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis): Pflege Im Fokus: Zahl der Pflegekräfte Steigt Weiter An. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/ Pressemitteilungen/2024/12/PD24_478 _224.html

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/ Pressemitteilungen/2024/01/PD24_033 _23_12.html

    Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis): Pflegekräftebedarf Steigt Deutlich Bis 2049. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/ Pressemitteilungen/2024/01/PD24_033 _23_12.html

    work page 2049

  4. [4]

    https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/ Pressemitteilungen/Zahl-der-Woche/2025/ PD25_19_p002.html

    Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis): Medianentgelte in der Pflege- branche Steigen überdurchschnittlich. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/ Pressemitteilungen/Zahl-der-Woche/2025/ PD25_19_p002.html

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    BMC Mus- culoskeletal Disorders 11, 12 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-12

    Tinubu, B.M.S., Mbada, C.E., Oyeyemi, A.L., Fabunmi, A.A.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in ibadan, south-west nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Mus- culoskeletal Disorders 11, 12 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-12

    work page doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-12 2010

  6. [6]

    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 21, 715 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03731-2

    Vinstrup, J., Jakobsen, M.D., Madeleine, P., Andersen, L.L.: Physical exposure during patient transfer and risk of back injury & low- back pain: prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 21, 715 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03731-2

    work page doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03731-2 2020

  7. [7]

    BMC Nursing 20(1), 158 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

    K., A., P., P.M.: A literature-based study of patient-centered care and commu- nication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way for- ward. BMC Nursing 20(1), 158 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

    work page doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2 2021

  8. [8]

    International Journal of Population Research 2012, 1–13 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/829835

    Flandorfer, P.: Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: The importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. International Journal of Population Research 2012, 1–13 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/829835

    work page doi:10.1155/2012/829835 2012

  9. [9]

    Journal of the American Medical Direc- tors Association 13(2), 114–120 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002

    Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G.J., Jonker, P., Witte, L.: Socially assis- tive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Direc- tors Association 13(2), 114–120 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002 2012

  10. [10]

    Journal of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 119(1166), 42 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmemag.119.1166_42

    Mukai, T.: Transfer assistance devices riba, robear. Journal of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 119(1166), 42 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmemag.119.1166_42

    work page doi:10.1299/jsmemag.119.1166_42 2016

  11. [11]

    : Development of high-functionality nursing- care assistant robot robear for patient- transfer and standing assistance

    Mukai, T., Toki, S., Obinata, G., et al. : Development of high-functionality nursing- care assistant robot robear for patient- transfer and standing assistance. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 5339–5346 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.3007462

    Mišeikis, J.: Lio-a personal robot assis- tant for human-robot interaction and care applications. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 5339–5346 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.3007462

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2020.3007462 2020

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the IEEE 100, 2527–2538 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200559

    Shibata, T.: Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proceedings of the IEEE 100, 2527–2538 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200559

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2200559 2012

  14. [14]

    Paper presented at 2013 IEEE 13th Interna- tional Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle, W A, USA, 24–26 June 2013 27

    Šabanović, S., Bennett, C.C., Chang, W.- L., Huber, L.: Paro robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory ther- apy for older adults with dementia (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650427 . Paper presented at 2013 IEEE 13th Interna- tional Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle, W A, USA, 24–26 June 2013 27

    work page doi:10.1109/icorr.2013.6650427 2013

  15. [15]

    Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, 18–22 April 2005

    Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Sakamoto, K., Tanie, K.: Psychologi- cal and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged (2005) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570535 . Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spai...

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.2005.1570535 2005

  16. [16]

    The Society for Post-Acute and Long- Term Care Medicine 16, 946–950 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.007

    Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G.J., Jonker, P., Witte, L.: Effectiveness of robot paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: A multicenter quasi-experimental study. The Society for Post-Acute and Long- Term Care Medicine 16, 946–950 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.007 2015

  17. [17]

    IEEE Access 14, 2431–2450 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3649801

    Guevara, J., Fernandez, M., Balbuena, J., Arroyo, D., Davila, M., Arce, D.: The role of socially assistive robots for the improvement of quality of life in elderly people: A systematic review. IEEE Access 14, 2431–2450 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3649801

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2025.3649801 2026

  18. [18]

    Proceed- ings of the IEEE 100, 2512–2526 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200539

    Fasola, J., Mataric, M.J.: Using socially assis- tive human–robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proceed- ings of the IEEE 100, 2512–2526 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200539

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2200539 2012

  19. [19]

    ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 14, 1–22 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1145/3711938

    Romeo, M., Torre, I., Le Maguer, S., Sleat, A., Cangelosi, A., Leite, I.: The effect of voice and repair strategy on trust formation and repair in human- robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 14, 1–22 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1145/3711938

    work page doi:10.1145/3711938 2025

  20. [20]

    HRI’14, 382–389 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559678

    Moshikina, L., Trickett, S., Trafton, J.: Social engagement in public places: A tale of one robot. HRI’14, 382–389 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559678

    work page doi:10.1145/2559636.2559678 2014

  21. [21]

    AI & SOCIETY 39 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01608-7

    Tuncer, S., Licoppe, C., Luff, P., Heath, C.: Recipient design in human–robot interac- tion: the emergent assessment of a robot’s competence. AI & SOCIETY 39 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01608-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01608-7 2023

  22. [22]

    2017 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), 51–55 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/URAI.2017.7992883

    Barnes, J., FakhrHosseini, M., Jeon, M., Park, C., Howard, A.: The influ- ence of robot design on acceptance of social robots. 2017 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), 51–55 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/URAI.2017.7992883

    work page doi:10.1109/urai.2017.7992883 2017

  23. [23]

    ACM Trans- actions on Human-Robot Interaction 8(2), 1– 19 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3311788

    Chien, S., Chu, L., Lee, H., Yang, C., Lin, F., Yang, P., Wang, T., Yeh, S.: Age difference in perceived ease of use, curiosity, and implicit negative attitude toward robots. ACM Trans- actions on Human-Robot Interaction 8(2), 1– 19 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3311788

    work page doi:10.1145/3311788 2019

  24. [24]

    International Jour- nal of Social Robotics 2, 361–375 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5

    Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. International Jour- nal of Social Robotics 2, 361–375 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5 2010

  25. [25]

    International Journal of Social Robotics 16, 403–413 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01088-9

    Rettinger, L., Fürst, A., Kupka-Klepsch, E., Mühlhauser, K., Haslinger-Baumann, E., Werner, F.: Observing the inter- action between a socially-assistive robot and residents in a nurs- ing home. International Journal of Social Robotics 16, 403–413 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01088-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01088-9 2023

  26. [26]

    International Journal of Social Robotics 16, 1561–1587 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01157-7

    Cho, M., Kim, D., Jang, M., Lee, J., Kim, J., Yun, W., Yoon, Y., Jang, J., Park, C., Ko, W., Jang, J., Yoon, H., Lee, D., Jang, C.: Evaluating human-care robot services for the elderly: An exper- imental study. International Journal of Social Robotics 16, 1561–1587 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01157-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01157-7 2024

  27. [27]

    Healthcare 11(9), 1286 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091286

    Sawik, B., Tobis, S., Baum, E., Suwal- ska, A., Stachnik, K., Cildoz, M., Agustin, A., Wieczorowska-Tobis, K.: Robots for elderly care: Review, multi-criteria opti- mization model and qualitative case 28 study. Healthcare 11(9), 1286 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091286

    work page doi:10.3390/healthcare11091286 2023

  28. [28]

    Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 100, 1–9 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad005

    Eckstein, M., Stoßel, G., Gerchen, M.F., Bilek, E., Kirsch, P., Ditzen, B.: Neural responses to instructed positive couple interaction: an fmri study on compli- ment sharing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 100, 1–9 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad005

    work page doi:10.1093/scan/nsad005 2023

  29. [29]

    Under submis- sion (2026)

    Mayer, C.J., Raithel, C., Yamamoto, H., Buchner, T., Iwan, B.S.V., Tempel, A., Staatz, E., Schommer, F., Schmetterer, M., Misok, D., Werner, C., Ditzen, B., Mombaur, K., Eckstein, M.: Trust, stress, and oxytocin: Psychophysiological responses of older adults to social robot interactions. Under submis- sion (2026). Submitted for publication

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Paper presented at CHI ’23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 23–28 April 2023

    Nonoda, S., Okada, K.: Navel - a social robot with verbal and non- verbal communication skills (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3583898 . Paper presented at CHI ’23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 23–28 April 2023

    work page doi:10.1145/3544549.3583898 2023

  31. [31]

    International Journal of Social Robotics 17, 2211–2228 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01260-3

    Nardelli, A., Maccagni, G., Minutoli, F., A., S., Recchiuto, C.: Towards intuitive interaction: Cognitive architecture for artifi- cial personality, emotional intelligence, and cognitive capabilities. International Journal of Social Robotics 17, 2211–2228 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01260-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01260-3 2025

  32. [32]

    Folstein, S.E. M. F.and Folstein, McHugh, P.R.: ”mini-mental state”. a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 12, 189–198 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 1975

  33. [33]

    2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), 197–204 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451752

    Sequeira, P., Alves-Oliveira, P., Ribeiro, T., Di Tllio, E., Petisca, S., Melo, F.S., Castellano, G., Paiva, A.: Discov- ering social interaction strategies for robots from restricted-perception wizard- of-oz studies. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), 197–204 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451752

    work page doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451752 2016

  34. [34]

    2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Com- munication (RO-MAN), 805–810 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172395

    Faria, D.R., Vieira, M., Faria, F.C.C., Pre- mebida, C.: Affective facial expressions recognition for human-robot interaction. 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Com- munication (RO-MAN), 805–810 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172395

    work page doi:10.1109/roman.2017.8172395 2017

  35. [35]

    ACM Trans- actions on Human-Robot Interaction 32, 1– 24 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1145/3773895

    Green, H.N., Iqbal, T.: Examining physiolog- ical response and facial expression as indica- tors of trust in a robot partner. ACM Trans- actions on Human-Robot Interaction 32, 1– 24 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1145/3773895

    work page doi:10.1145/3773895 2025

  36. [36]

    Chen, S., Liu, Y., Gao, X., Han, Z.: Mobilefacenets: Efficient cnns for accurate real-time face verification on mobile devices, 428–438 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97909-0_46

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97909-0_46 2018

  37. [37]

    J.and Vandeput, Spaepen, A., Van Huffel, S.: Influence of mental stress on heart rate and heart rate vari- ability

    Taelman, S. J.and Vandeput, Spaepen, A., Van Huffel, S.: Influence of mental stress on heart rate and heart rate vari- ability. 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, 1366–1369 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_324

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_324 2009

  38. [38]

    Psychiatry investigation 15, 235–245 (2018) https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.08.17

    Kim, H.G., Cheon, E.J., Bai, D.S., Lee, Y.H., Koo, B.H.: Stress and heart rate variability: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Psychiatry investigation 15, 235–245 (2018) https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.08.17

    work page doi:10.30773/pi.2017.08.17 2018

  39. [39]

    Data in Brief 57, 111027 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.111027

    Lei, G., Cheng, W., Yin, X., Wu, Y.: The dataset of multi-target vital signs monitored by fmcw radar. Data in Brief 57, 111027 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.111027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.111027 2024

  40. [40]

    Sensors 2025 25(15), 4792 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/s25154792 29

    Hassanpour, A., Yang, B.: Contactless vital sign monitoring: A review towards multi-modal multi-task approaches. Sensors 2025 25(15), 4792 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/s25154792 29

    work page doi:10.3390/s25154792 2025

  41. [41]

    The Japanese Journal of Psychology 93, 526–535 (2023) https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.93.20231

    Nonoda, S., Okada, K.: Psychological assess- ments of paired-comparison and likert for- mats:comparing their reliability, validity, and ease of answering questions. The Japanese Journal of Psychology 93, 526–535 (2023) https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.93.20231

    work page doi:10.4992/jjpsy.93.20231 2023

  42. [42]

    RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Inter- active Communication, 732–737 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415182

    Bethel, C.L., Salomon, K., Murphy, R.R., Burke, J.L.: Survey of psy- chophysiology measurements applied to human-robot interaction. RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Inter- active Communication, 732–737 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415182

    work page doi:10.1109/roman.2007.4415182 2007

  43. [43]

    Kidd, C.D., Breazeal, C.: Human-robot inter- action experiments: Lessons learned, 141–142 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Comput- ers in Human Behavior 3, 49–59 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0

    Heinssen, J., K., R., Glass, C.R., Knight, L.A.: Assessing computer anxi- ety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Comput- ers in Human Behavior 3, 49–59 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0 1987

  45. [45]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

    Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief mea- sures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

    work page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 1988

  46. [46]

    International jour- nal of geriatric psychiatry 14, 858–865 (1999)

    Almeida, O.P., Almeida, S.A.: Short ver- sions of the geriatric depression scale: a study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to icd-10 and dsm-iv. International jour- nal of geriatric psychiatry 14, 858–865 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099- 1166(199910)14:10<858::AID- GPS35>3.0.CO;2-8

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1099- 1999

  47. [47]

    The Gerontologist 46, 503–513 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503

    Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., Renteln Kruse, W., Beck, J.C., Stuck, A.E.: Performance of an abbre- viated version of the lubben social network scale among three european community-dwelling older adult popula- tions. The Gerontologist 46, 503–513 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503

    work page doi:10.1093/geront/46.4.503 2006

  48. [48]

    Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 265–283 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006623213355

    Hess, U., Blairy, S., Kleck, R.E.: The influence of facial emotion displays, gender, and ethnicity on judgments of dominance and affiliation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 265–283 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006623213355

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1006623213355 2000

  49. [49]

    Personality and Social Psychology Review 17, 142–157 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472607

    Hess, U., Fischer, A.: Emotional mimicry as social regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17, 142–157 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472607

    work page doi:10.1177/1088868312472607 2013

  50. [50]

    Royal Society open science 12, 241632 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241632

    Hömke, P., Levinson, S.C., Emmendor- fer, A.K., Holler, J.: Eyebrow movements as signals of communicative problems in human face-to-face interaction. Royal Society open science 12, 241632 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241632

    work page doi:10.1098/rsos.241632 2025

  51. [51]

    Proceedings - 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2013, 159–165 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.33

    Grafsgaard, J., Wiggins, J., Boyer, K., Wiebe, E., Lester, J.: Automatically rec- ognizing facial indicators of frustration: A learning-centric analysis. Proceedings - 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2013, 159–165 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.33

    work page doi:10.1109/acii.2013.33 2013

  52. [52]

    EMNLP (Findings), 3478–3492 (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.15375

    Shi, W., Li, Y., Sahay, S., Yu, Z.: Refine and imitate: Reducing repetition and incon- sistency in persuasion dialogues via rein- forcement learning and human demonstra- tion. EMNLP (Findings), 3478–3492 (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.15375

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.15375 2021

  53. [53]

    Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human- Agent Interaction (HAI ’21), 241–244 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1145/3472307.3484651

    Yang, J., Kikuchi, H., Uegaki, T., Kikuchi, H.: The effect of the repetitive utterances complexity on user’s perceived empathy and desire to continue dialogue by a chat- oriented dialogue system. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human- Agent Interaction (HAI ’21), 241–244 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1145/3472307.3484651

    work page doi:10.1145/3472307.3484651 2021

  54. [54]

    CHI ’22: Proceedings of the 30 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 307, 1–15 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517525

    Hu, Y., Qu, Y., Maus, A., Mutlu, B.: Polite or direct? conversation design of a smart display for older adults based on polite- ness theory. CHI ’22: Proceedings of the 30 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 307, 1–15 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517525

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517525 2022

  55. [55]

    Journal of Affective Disorders 61, 201–216 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4

    Thayer, J.F., Lane, R.D.: A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion reg- ulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders 61, 201–216 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00338-4 2000

  56. [56]

    The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003

    Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003., 55–60 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796 31

    work page doi:10.1109/roman.2003.1251796 2003