Comparative Analysis of Simulation Results of Dielectric Laser Acceleration of Non-relativistic Electrons in Transparent and Reflective Periodic Structures

A.V. Vasyliev; G.O. Krivonosov; G.V. Sotnikov; I.V. Beznosenko

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 16 references

Comparative Analysis of Simulation Results of Dielectric Laser Acceleration of Non-relativistic Electrons in Transparent and Reflective Periodic Structures

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Reflective periodic structures accelerate non-relativistic electrons faster than transparent ones in simulations, at lower laser field.

desk verdict Plausible extension of DLA simulations to non-relativistic reflective structures, but the claimed advantage rests on thin damage-threshold assumptions and one internal inconsistency. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16275 v1 pith:QNUTMQ7M submitted 2024-11-25 physics.acc-ph physics.plasm-ph

I.V. Beznosenko , A.V. Vasyliev , G.V. Sotnikov , G.O. Krivonosov This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.acc-phphysics.plasm-ph PACS 41.75.Jv41.75.Ht42.25.Bs

keywords dielectriclaseraccelerationnon-relativisticelectronsreflectiveperiodicstructurestransparentchip-structuresPICsimulationgradientdamagethresholdelectronbeamcollimation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses particle-in-cell simulations to compare how well transparent fused-silica and reflective gold-coated periodic structures accelerate 33.9 keV electrons driven by 800 nm laser light. It claims that reflective structures are the more promising route: a single reflective rectangular structure reaches 125 MeV/m at a field amplitude of 1.8 GV/m, while a single transparent structure reaches 86 MeV/m at 6 GV/m, and a double reflective structure reaches 160 MeV/m at 3.6 GV/m versus 125 MeV/m for its transparent counterpart. It also finds that alternating the laser illumination from one side to the other keeps the accelerated beam more collimated, and that commercially available reflective diffraction gratings can provide around 30 MeV/m, which the authors consider sufficient for first experiments. The practical interest is that reflective structures could deliver compact laser-driven electron acceleration with less demanding laser intensity than transparent chip-structures.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the synchronism condition $\lambda_p = \lambda\beta N$, which fixes the grating period so the electron stays in the accelerating phase of the laser field, and by two height rules: for transparent structures $H_t = \lambda/(2(n-1))$ makes the field phase shift by $\pi$ between pillar and groove, while for reflective structures $H_r = \lambda/4$ makes the light reflected from the groove bottom oppose the decelerating half-cycle of the incident light, effectively replacing deceleration with acceleration over the grooves. The simulations are particle-in-cell (PIC) calculations of electron bunches moving 100–300 nm above fused-silica or gold-coated periodic structures; the double-sided variants alternate illumination between sides every three periods, which confines the beam and prevents electrons from drifting onto the structure.

What would settle it

Fabricate the simulated single rectangular reflective structure (period 277.769 nm, groove depth 200 nm, gold coating), drive it with 800 nm pulses at 1.8 GV/m, and measure the energy gain of a 33.9 keV electron beam: an observed acceleration rate clearly below 125 MeV/m, or laser damage below 1.8 GV/m, would contradict the central comparison.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for non-relativistic electrons with initial energy 33.9 keV, reflective periodic chip-structures produce higher simulated acceleration rates than transparent ones at lower applied laser field. The maximum simulated rate is 160 MeV/m in a double reflective structure with rectangular grooves (period 277.769 nm, depth 200 nm, gold coating, total field 3.6 GV/m), compared with 125 MeV/m for the best double transparent structure at 6 GV/m; for single structures the numbers are 125 MeV/m at 1.8 GV/m versus 86 MeV/m at 6 GV/m. The paper also reports that reflective structures with a rectangular profile outperform triangular and sinusoidal profiles (125 vs 25 vs 37 MeV/m), that widening the pillars to 65–75% of the period raises the single-structure rate to about 139 MeV/m, and that serial reflective diffraction gratings can accelerate at 14–30 MeV/m while the tested transparent gratings produce no acceleration.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted rates assume a gold reflective structure can sustain a laser field of 1.8 GV/m (3.6 GV/m for the double structure), taken as one-third of literature damage thresholds rather than measured on these particular nanostructures; since acceleration rate scales with field amplitude, a lower real damage threshold would shrink or erase the reported advantage over transparent structures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Reflective periodic structures could replace transparent ones in dielectric laser accelerators, giving higher simulated gradients from roughly one-third the laser field amplitude for single structures.
Double reflective structures with alternating illumination produce more collimated electron beams, reducing particle loss to the structure and improving the usable accelerated beam.
Off-the-shelf reflective diffraction gratings such as GH13-36U are predicted to deliver about 30 MeV/m for 33.9 keV electrons, enough for a first experimental demonstration without custom nanofabrication.
Pillar width is a tunable parameter: occupying 65–75% of the period with pillars raises the single-reflective gradient to about 139 MeV/m.
The same design rules ($\lambda_p = \lambda\beta N$ and $H_r = \lambda/4$) can be reused to choose gratings for other non-relativistic electron energies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the reflective structure's real damage threshold is somewhat lower than assumed, the reflective scheme may still win because its advantage comes from field geometry rather than from a higher field; measuring the damage threshold of the actual grating is the decisive next step.
The 30 MeV/m predicted for commercial gratings is small but measurable with a 33.9 keV electron gun and a magnetic spectrometer, so the paper effectively outlines a low-cost tabletop experiment.
The quarter-wave reflective principle is not tied to 33.9 keV: the same $H_r = \lambda/4$ geometry could be matched to other velocities through the synchronism condition, potentially giving a reflective route for higher-energy dielectric laser acceleration.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a reasonable parameter study that extends reflective DLA simulations to the non-relativistic regime and makes a concrete, testable proposal to use commercial gratings. The central qualitative claim is plausible, but the specific rate advantage is sensitive to assumed gold damage thresholds, and one reported number is internally inconsistent, so treat the quantitative results as provisional.

What's actually new: previous work on reflective structures was mostly relativistic; here they simulate 33.9 keV electrons and compare single/double transparent vs reflective, including beam quality. The idea to use off-the-shelf ThorLabs gratings is practical and useful. The design rules (period, heights) match earlier literature, and the qualitative dependencies (e.g., acceleration vs pillar height/width) track known results, which gives some confidence the simulations are not wildly off.

Where it's soft: the main issue is the assumed permissible field amplitudes. They set E=1.8 GV/m for gold and 3.6 GV/m for the double, as one-third of literature damage thresholds. But those thresholds were measured on flat surfaces, not on nanostructured gratings with local field enhancement. The margin over transparent structures is thin: single reflective beats single transparent only if sustainable gold amplitude exceeds about 1.24 GV/m, and double reflective needs about 2.81 GV/m. With realistic field enhancement at pillar edges and corners, the incident amplitude that keeps local field below damage could be 30-45% lower, which would flip the conclusion. The paper doesn't address this. Also, Section III reports 53 MeV/m for a single transparent structure with Ht=100 nm, while Table II lists 46 MeV/m for the same configuration. That discrepancy suggests the simulation outputs need verification. There are no convergence checks, no mesh resolution details, no error estimates, and no code or data released, so independent verification is not possible.

Who it's for: researchers working on dielectric laser acceleration, especially those looking for low-cost entry points. The paper would benefit from a round of peer review that asks for simulation details and a recheck of the numbers. The qualitative conclusion—reflective structures are worth experimenting with—holds up well enough to justify referee time.

Bottom line: send it to peers, but ask for convergence tests, resolution of the 53/46 inconsistency, and a more careful treatment of damage thresholds with local field enhancement. If those come back clean, the paper is a useful contribution.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports PIC simulations of dielectric laser acceleration of 33.9 keV electrons in transparent fused-silica periodic chip-structures and in gold-coated reflective periodic structures, comparing acceleration rates and beam collimation. The central claim is that reflective structures outperform transparent ones: Table II lists 125 MeV/m and 160 MeV/m for single and double reflective structures versus 86 MeV/m and 125 MeV/m for the corresponding transparent structures, at assumed field amplitudes of 1.8 and 3.6 GV/m versus 6 GV/m. The paper also proposes that serial commercial reflective diffraction gratings can provide acceleration rates of about 30 MeV/m, which the authors argue is sufficient for registration and practical use.

Significance. If the comparative conclusion holds, the manuscript identifies a practical route to higher acceleration rates in compact dielectric laser accelerators at lower applied laser field amplitude, and it suggests using readily available reflective gratings for initial experiments. The design-rule predictions for optimal period and pillar height are consistent with earlier literature, and the predicted accelerations are falsifiable by the proposed experimental setup. The paper's usefulness is limited, however, by the absence of simulation convergence checks, lack of code or data availability, and reliance on literature damage thresholds rather than measurements of the actual nanostructures; these gaps leave the quantitative rates uncertain.

major comments (3)

[Section III and Table II] The same configuration, a single transparent periodic chip-structure with Ht = 100 nm and N = 1, is reported as giving an acceleration rate of 53 MeV/m in the text of Section III but as 46 MeV/m in Table II. Since Table II is the central comparative result, this internal inconsistency must be resolved before the quantitative claims can be accepted.
[Section II, Table I, and Table II] The entire comparison between reflective and transparent structures depends on assigning permissible field amplitudes of E = 1.8 and 3.6 GV/m for gold and E = 6 GV/m for fused silica, stated as one-third of literature damage thresholds. The manuscript provides no damage measurement for the specific gold-coated nanostructures simulated and no account of local field enhancement at pillar edges or corners. Because acceleration rate scales with the applied field amplitude and the reported advantage over transparent structures is only a factor of 1.45 (single) and 1.28 (double), a downward revision of the sustainable gold amplitude by roughly 30-45% would eliminate or invert the claimed advantage. A sensitivity analysis or an experimental/optical measurement of the sustainable field in the actual structures is needed to support the central claim.
[Sections III and IV (simulation methodology)] The paper reports specific acceleration rates from PIC simulations but gives no mesh resolution, particle number, boundary conditions, convergence checks, or simulation code/input data. Without these details, the reported numbers, including the headline 160 MeV/m and 30 MeV/m values, cannot be independently reproduced or assessed for numerical accuracy. The authors should state their convergence criteria and make the simulation setup available, or at minimum report the numerical parameters.

minor comments (4)

[Section II, Table I] There are typographical errors in Table I: 'f used silica' should be 'fused silica', and 'V alue' should be 'Value'.
[Section V, Conclusion 2] Conclusion 2 states that reflective structures provide acceleration 'at three times lower intensity' of laser radiation for single structures and 'one and a half times lower intensity' for double structures, but the amplitudes in Table I are 6 GV/m versus 1.8 GV/m (factor 3.33 in amplitude, factor 11 in intensity) and 6 GV/m versus 3.6 GV/m (factor 1.67 in amplitude, factor 2.8 in intensity). Please correct the wording to refer consistently to amplitude or intensity.
[Section III, Figure 5] The caption of Fig. 5 states Ht = 1000 nm, while the text discussing the first maximum for a single transparent structure refers to Ht = 100 nm; please verify that the figure caption and the text refer to the intended configuration.
[Various] The manuscript contains several language and formatting issues, including 'incidents' used as a verb, 'pa-per' and 'groves' as typographical slips, and inconsistent hyphenation. A careful English-language edit is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported acceleration rates are PIC simulation outputs obtained from externally sourced design rules and damage-threshold field amplitudes.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities (acceleration rates 46–160 MeV/m, beam quality) are outputs of Particle-in-Cell simulations, not quantities defined by the design equations. The synchronism condition (1), the transparent pillar height (3), and the reflective groove depth (4) are inputs taken from prior work and external physical reasoning; they are tested against the simulations (e.g., Hr=200 nm is confirmed as optimal for the reflective geometry), not fitted to produce the target rates. The field amplitudes in Table I (6 GV/m for fused silica, 1.8 GV/m for gold) are stated to be one-third of literature damage thresholds measured by Soong et al., an external experimental source; the acceleration rates scale with these amplitudes, so the quantitative conclusions inherit that external assumption, but this is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. The cited prior works by the same authors ([4], [9], [11]) are contextual (previous relativistic studies, schematic illustration, equipment description) and are not load-bearing for the new non-relativistic results. A numerical inconsistency exists between the text's 53 MeV/m and Table II's 46 MeV/m for the single transparent structure at Ht=100 nm, but this is an internal-consistency issue, not a circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its central numbers depend on literature damage-threshold fields, standard DLA design rules, and an unstated PIC setup. The only hand-adjusted value is the 1/3 safety factor applied to the damage threshold, which scales all reported rates.

free parameters (1)

Laser field amplitude safety factor = 1/3 of literature damage threshold
The authors choose E = 6 GV/m for fused silica and 1.8 GV/m for gold as one-third of published damage thresholds (Table I). All acceleration rates scale linearly with this amplitude, and the comparative conclusion depends on the two materials' relative thresholds.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Synchronism condition lambda_p = lambda * beta * N (Eq. 1) determines the grating period.
Standard DLA phase-matching; taken from prior work. The paper uses it to set lambda_p = 277.769 nm for 33.9 keV electrons.
domain assumption Optimal transparent pillar height Ht = lambda/(2(n-1)) (Eq. 3) and reflective groove depth Hr = lambda/4 (Eq. 4).
Design rules from earlier DLA studies; the simulations scan around them but these rules set the baseline geometries.
domain assumption Damage-threshold field values from Refs. [5] and [12] apply to the simulated nanostructures.
The maximum field amplitudes used in simulation are one-third of literature values; if the thresholds differ for the specific geometries, absolute rates change.
domain assumption PIC simulation with the described geometry and materials accurately resolves the near-field laser-electron interaction.
No convergence tests, mesh resolution, or code details are given; this is the core tooling assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparative Analysis of Simulation Results of Dielectric Laser Acceleration of Non-relativistic Electrons in Transparent and Reflective Periodic Structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QNUTMQ7M

@misc{pith2026241116275,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparative Analysis of Simulation Results of Dielectric Laser Acceleration of Non-relativistic Electrons in Transparent and Reflective Periodic Structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QNUTMQ7M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16275}
}

read the original abstract

To support of our experimental studies on dielectric laser acceleration, numerical studies of laser acceleration of nonrelativistic electrons with the initial energy of 33.9 keV in transparent and reflective periodic structures are car-ried out. On the basis of computer simulations, the acceleration rates of electrons and the quality of their beams after acceleration in compact structures of different configurations were determined and compared. Prospective acceleration schemes are proposed, in particular with reflective periodic structures, which can provide higher rates of electron acceleration in periodic structures than in previously obtained studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16275 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. 3D model of the DLA experiment: electrons spatially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Single (a) and double (b) transparent periodic chip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dependencies of the rate of electron acceleration on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spatial and energy distribution of electrons: before [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spatial and energy distribution of electrons between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spatial and energy distribution of electrons between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Spatial and energy distribution of electrons between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Part of the double reflective periodic chip-structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Dependency of the rate of laser acceleration of elec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[1]

Numerical studies of the rate of laser acceleration of non-relativistic electrons and the quality of their beams after acceleration in reflective periodic chip- structures were carried out and compared with the similar studies in transparent periodic chip- structures

work page
[2]

The perspective of using reflective periodic chip- structures is shown. The use of them can provide much more efficient acceleration of electrons than the use of transparent chip-structures: the acceler- ation rate is one and a half times higher at three times lower intensity of laser radiation in the case of single periodic chip-structures and at one and...

work page
[3]

Excellent Science in Ukraine

The possibility of using serial reflective diffraction gratings for DLA is shown, since they can provide electron acceleration rates (30 MeV/m) sufficient for registration and practical use. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study is supported by the National Research Foun- dation of Ukraine under the program “Excellent Science in Ukraine” (project # 2023.03/0182). 8

work page 2023
[4]

R. J. England, U. Niedermayer, L. Schachter, T. Hughes, P. Musumeci, R. K. Li, and W. D. Kimura, Considera- tions for a TeV collider based on dielectric laser acceler- ators, JINST 17, 05012 (2022)

work page 2022
[5]

R. B. Palmer, A Laser Driven Grating Linac, Particle Accelerators 11, 81–90 (1980)

work page 1980
[6]

R. J. England, R. J. Noble, K. Bane, D. Dowell, C.-K. Ng, J. E. Spencer, S. Tantawi, Z. Wu, R. L. Byer, E. Per- alta, K. Soong, C.-M. Chang, B. Montazeri, S. J. Wolf, B. Cowan, J. Dawson, W. Gai, P. Hommelhoff, Y.- C. Huang, C. Jing, C. McGuinness, R. B. Palmer, B. Naranjo, J. Rosenzweig, G. Travish, A. Mizrahi, L. Schachter, C. Sears, G. R. Werner, and R...

work page 2014
[7]

A. V. Vasyliev, A. O. Bolshov, K. V. Galaydych, A. I. Povrozin, and G. V. Sotnikov, Acceleration of elec- tron bunches using periodic dielectric structures with and without coating, Problems of Atomic Science and Tech- nology 134 (04), 60–64 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Breuer, Dielectric laser acceleration of non-relativistic electrons at a photonic structure, Diss

J. Breuer, Dielectric laser acceleration of non-relativistic electrons at a photonic structure, Diss. Ludwig- Maximilians University (Munchen): Faculty of Physics, 10,50,ix (2013)

work page 2013

Show all 16 references

[9]

Yousefi, Novel Silicon Nano-Structures for Dielec- tric Laser Accelerators, Diss

P. Yousefi, Novel Silicon Nano-Structures for Dielec- tric Laser Accelerators, Diss. Friedrich-Alexander Uni- versity (Erlangen-Nurnberg): Faculty of Natural Sci- ences, 13,viii (2019)

2019
[10]

Wei, Investigations Into Dual-Grating Dielectric Laser-Driven Accelerators, Diss

Y. Wei, Investigations Into Dual-Grating Dielectric Laser-Driven Accelerators, Diss. the University of Liver- pool: Faculty of Science and Engineering, 41,15,21,46–52 (2018)

2018
[11]

Peralta, Accelerator on a Chip: Design, Fabrica- tion, and Demonstration of Grating-Based Dielectric Microstructures for Laser-Driven Acceleration of Elec- trons, Diss

E. Peralta, Accelerator on a Chip: Design, Fabrica- tion, and Demonstration of Grating-Based Dielectric Microstructures for Laser-Driven Acceleration of Elec- trons, Diss. Stanford University: Department of Applied Physics, 19–22 (2015)

2015
[12]

G. V. Sotnikov, A. V. Vasiliev, I. V. Beznosenko, S. M. Kovalov, A. I. Povrozin, and O. O. Svys- tunov, Comparative Analysis of Electron Acceleration by Laser Pulse in Flat and Chip Dielectric Structures, arXiv:2409.19313 [physics.acc-ph], 12 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[13]

I. V. Beznosenko, A. V. Vasyliev, and G. V. Sotnikov, Simulation of deflecting system based on permanent mag- nets with a non-uniform magnetic field to register accel- erated and decelerated electrons generated in dielectric laser accelerator, Problems of Atomic Science and Te...

2023
[14]

A. V. Vasiliev, A. N. Dovbnya, A. M. Yegorov, V. P. Zait- sev, V. P. Leshchenko, I. N. Onischenko, A. I. Povrozin, and G. V. Sotnikov, Works in the NSC KIPT on the creation and application of the CPA laser system, Prob- lems of Atomic Science and Technology 116 (04), 289– 293 (2018)

2018
[15]

Soong, R

K. Soong, R. L. Byer, C. McGuinness, E. Peralta, and E. Colby, Experimental determination of damage thresh- old characteristics of IR compatible optical materials, in Proceedings of 2011 Particle Accelerator Conference, PAC’11 OC/IEEE, New York, USA, 277–279 (2011)

2011
[16]

Y. Wei, S. Jamison, G. Xia, K. Hanahoe, Y. Li, J. D. A. Smith, and C. P. Welsch, Beam quality study for a grating-based dielectric laser-driven accelerator, Physics of Plasmas 24 (02), 023102-3 (2017)

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Numerical studies of the rate of laser acceleration of non-relativistic electrons and the quality of their beams after acceleration in reflective periodic chip- structures were carried out and compared with the similar studies in transparent periodic chip- structures

work page

[2] [2]

The perspective of using reflective periodic chip- structures is shown. The use of them can provide much more efficient acceleration of electrons than the use of transparent chip-structures: the acceler- ation rate is one and a half times higher at three times lower intensity of laser radiation in the case of single periodic chip-structures and at one and...

work page

[3] [3]

Excellent Science in Ukraine

The possibility of using serial reflective diffraction gratings for DLA is shown, since they can provide electron acceleration rates (30 MeV/m) sufficient for registration and practical use. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study is supported by the National Research Foun- dation of Ukraine under the program “Excellent Science in Ukraine” (project # 2023.03/0182). 8

work page 2023

[4] [4]

R. J. England, U. Niedermayer, L. Schachter, T. Hughes, P. Musumeci, R. K. Li, and W. D. Kimura, Considera- tions for a TeV collider based on dielectric laser acceler- ators, JINST 17, 05012 (2022)

work page 2022

[5] [5]

R. B. Palmer, A Laser Driven Grating Linac, Particle Accelerators 11, 81–90 (1980)

work page 1980

[6] [6]

R. J. England, R. J. Noble, K. Bane, D. Dowell, C.-K. Ng, J. E. Spencer, S. Tantawi, Z. Wu, R. L. Byer, E. Per- alta, K. Soong, C.-M. Chang, B. Montazeri, S. J. Wolf, B. Cowan, J. Dawson, W. Gai, P. Hommelhoff, Y.- C. Huang, C. Jing, C. McGuinness, R. B. Palmer, B. Naranjo, J. Rosenzweig, G. Travish, A. Mizrahi, L. Schachter, C. Sears, G. R. Werner, and R...

work page 2014

[7] [7]

A. V. Vasyliev, A. O. Bolshov, K. V. Galaydych, A. I. Povrozin, and G. V. Sotnikov, Acceleration of elec- tron bunches using periodic dielectric structures with and without coating, Problems of Atomic Science and Tech- nology 134 (04), 60–64 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Breuer, Dielectric laser acceleration of non-relativistic electrons at a photonic structure, Diss

J. Breuer, Dielectric laser acceleration of non-relativistic electrons at a photonic structure, Diss. Ludwig- Maximilians University (Munchen): Faculty of Physics, 10,50,ix (2013)

work page 2013