Spin relaxation in $X$-wave magnets with $X=p, d, f, g, i$

A. V. Nikolaev; Lijie Liu; L. L. Tao; Mingbo Dou; M. Ye. Zhuravlev; Xianjie Wang; Xu Chen

Spin relaxation in $X$-wave magnets with $X=p, d, f, g, i$

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin relaxation in X-wave magnets is anisotropic, and the p-wave member alone couples two spin components.

desk verdict A clean, self-contained DP calculation that systematically maps spin relaxation matrices for five X-wave magnet families; the p-wave yz coupling is the real news and the algebra holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17807 v1 pith:QOVYDWFM submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.other

Lijie Liu , Mingbo Dou , Xu Chen , Xianjie Wang , M. Ye. Zhuravlev , A. V. Nikolaev , L. L. Tao This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.other

keywords spinrelaxationX-wavemagnetsaltermagnetismspin-orbitcouplinglifetimeanisotropymomentum-dependentsplittingp-wavespintronics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Spin relaxation destroys spin polarization and limits spintronic devices. This paper asks how that relaxation works in a family of two-dimensional magnetic metals whose conduction-electron spins are split by both spin-orbit coupling and the magnetic order, known as X-wave magnets with X = p, d, f, g, i. Treating momentum scattering in the standard spin-precession picture, the authors derive the full 3×3 matrix of spin relaxation times for these materials and show that when the order axis points along [001], the d-, f-, g-, and i-wave members all relax each spin component independently but with different in-plane and out-of-plane rates. The p-wave member is the exception: its yz entry couples the Sy and Sz components, producing a two-stage decay. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives concrete predictions for anisotropic, order-axis-tunable spin lifetimes and a distinctive experimental fingerprint for identifying p-wave magnets.

What carries the argument

The engine of the calculation is the matrix $D_{\rm SO}$ built from angular averages of the momentum-dependent effective field $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_k$ that precesses electron spins: $D_{\rm SO}|_{q=0}=1/\tau_{ij}$. For the Hamiltonian $H=\hbar^2k^2/2m+\alpha(k_x\sigma_y-k_y\sigma_x)+\Delta h(k)\hat n\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}$, the field is $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_k=\frac{2}{\hbar}(-\alpha k_y+\Delta h(k)\hat n_x,\ \alpha k_x+\Delta h(k)\hat n_y,\ \Delta h(k)\hat n_z)$. The function $h(k)$ is the symmetry-allowed altermagnetic harmonic: $k_x$ for p, $k_xk_y$ for d, $k_x(k_x^2-3k_y^2)$ for f, $k_xk_y(k_x^2-k_y^2)$ for g, and $k_xk_y(3k_x^2-k_y^2)(k_x^2-3k_y^2)$ for i; its node count distinguishes the members. All matrix elements reduce to Fermi-surface averages $\langle k_x^a k_y^b\rangle$ evaluated on a circular Fermi surface at $k=k_F$ (Appendix A). Whether off-diagonal entries survive is decided by whether those angular averages vanish, so the p-wave harmonic produces the sole nonzero off-diagonal coupling $1/\tau_{yz}=-C\Delta\alpha$.

What would settle it

Measure the time-resolved spin polarization in a p-wave X-wave magnet with the order axis along [001] after injecting an in-plane spin along y. The theory predicts that a z-component appears transiently and decays biexponentially; observing no S_z signal, or a purely single-exponential decay, would rule out the claimed $1/\tau_{yz}$ coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a two-dimensional X-wave magnet with spin-orbit coupling linear in momentum, the relaxation of a uniform spin polarization is fully encoded in the matrix $1/\tau_{ij}$ of reciprocal spin relaxation times, and for the order axis along [001] this matrix takes a simple symmetry-determined form. For d-, f-, g-, and i-wave magnets the matrix is diagonal, with $1/\tau_{xx}=1/\tau_{yy}\neq 1/\tau_{zz}$: the in-plane components also relax through the altermagnetic splitting while the out-of-plane component relaxes only through spin-orbit coupling. For the p-wave magnet, the matrix acquires nonzero $1/\tau_{yz}=1/\tau_{zy}=-C\Delta\alpha$, so $S_y$ and $S_z$ obey coupled equations and the spin decays as a superposition of two exponentials with decay rates $\lambda_1=2\alpha^2 k_F^2\tau/\hbar^2$ and $\lambda_2=2(\Delta^2+2\alpha^2)k_F^2\tau/\hbar^2$. All rates are proportional to the momentum relaxation time $\tau$, the spin-orbit strength squared, and the altermagnetic spin-split strength squared, a signature of the strong-scattering regime of this mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats the Fermi surface as a perfect circle at a single wave number and uses one momentum-independent scattering time $\tau$; if real X-wave magnets have warped Fermi surfaces or momentum-dependent scattering, the matrix entries—and even which spin components couple—could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In d-, f-, g-, and i-wave magnets with the order axis along [001], spin components relax independently, so an anisotropic spin lifetime is guaranteed: the out-of-plane component has rate $2C\alpha^2$, while each in-plane component has rate $C(\Delta^2 k_F^{2n}+\alpha^2)$ with a harmonic-dependent power $n$.
For the p-wave magnet, a pure $S_y$ polarization generates a transient $S_z$ and vice versa; both then decay biexponentially with rates $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$, so time-resolved spin measurements can extract both the spin-orbit strength $\alpha$ and the altermagnetic spin-split strength $\Delta$.
Because every relaxation rate is proportional to the momentum relaxation time $\tau$, cleaner samples with longer $\tau$ will show faster spin decay in these systems, the hallmark of the precessional spin-relaxation regime rather than spin-flip scattering.
Rotating the order axis away from [001] changes the coefficients in the general matrices (6)-(10), so the spin lifetime becomes controllable through magnetic order reorientation, a functionality absent in nonmagnetic spin-orbit materials.
The $\Delta^2 k_F^{2n}$ coefficient in the in-plane rates scales with the harmonic order of each member (d: $k_F^2/4$, f: $k_F^4$, g: $k_F^6/16$, i: $k_F^{10}/4$), giving a quantitative fingerprint of which X-wave member is present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension is to read the general matrices (6)-(10) as a map: measuring the full relaxation tensor while rotating the order axis should reconstruct the symmetry of h(k) itself, not just its [001] slice.
The circular-Fermi-surface assumption is the main place real materials could deviate; testing the predicted diagonal structure in a material with a warped Fermi surface would show whether the symmetry argument survives realistic band structures.
Applying the same derivation to spin-orbit fields that are unidirectional in momentum space would predict suppressed or vanishing relaxation for certain order-axis orientations, potentially giving X-wave magnets with very long spin lifetimes.
The p-wave S_y-S_z coupling offers a direct transport signature of odd-parity magnetic order: an injected in-plane spin should produce an out-of-plane spin signal whose rise time is set by $\Delta$, which would be absent in a nonmagnetic spin-orbit material.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a self-contained model calculation of Dyakonov-Perel spin relaxation for 2D X-wave magnets (p,d,f,g,i) with Rashba SOC. It's an incremental extension of existing DP theory—the formalism is standard, and the d-wave case reduces to prior work after a 45° rotation—but the extension to p, f, g, i waves and to arbitrary Néel vector is legitimately new. The paper earns its keep as a systematic reference.

What it does well: the angular averages in Appendix A are correct, the p-wave matrix in Eq. (13) diagonalizes properly into the eigenvalues given in Eq. (21), and the d-wave limit matches Ref. [39] in the rotated frame. There are no fitted parameters, no circular steps, and the derivation is transparent enough to check line by line. For the [001] Néel vector, the diagonal structure for d,f,g,i and the Sy–Sz coupling for p-wave are the central results.

Soft spots, in proportion: the main approximation is a circular Fermi surface with an isotropic momentum relaxation time τ. The paper uses this without much discussion. That's a real simplification, but it's not a structural flaw—the off-diagonal entries that vanish for d,f,g,i do so because of angular averages like that are zero by symmetry of h(k), not because of the circular shape. Symmetry-preserving Fermi-surface warping won't turn them on. So the qualitative claims survive; only the quantitative rates would shift. Also, the paper doesn't make material-specific predictions; it's a model-level calculation. That limits significance but doesn't undermine soundness. Minor typos and rough formatting throughout, but nothing substantive.

Who it's for: people working on spin relaxation in altermagnets and unconventional magnets—especially experimentalists who want the 1/τ tensor for a candidate X-wave material. It's not a breakthrough, but it's a useful, citable reference.

Recommendation: yes, send it to peer review. A good referee should check the arbitrary-Néel-vector matrices and the symmetry protection argument, but this deserves a published record after a light revision. I'd accept with minor comments.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies D'yakonov-Perel' spin relaxation in two-dimensional X-wave magnets (X = p, d, f, g, i) with Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Starting from a Hamiltonian that combines Rashba SOC with an altermagnetic spin-splitting term Δ h(k) n·σ, the authors derive, within a relaxation-time-approximation kinetic equation, the general matrix of reciprocal spin-relaxation times for an arbitrary Néel-vector direction. They then specialize to the [001] Néel vector, obtaining explicit matrices (Eqs. 13–17) and the table of rates (Table I). The central qualitative findings are that the reciprocal spin-relaxation-time matrix is diagonal for the d-, f-, g-, and i-wave magnets, with 1/τ_xx = 1/τ_yy ≠ 1/τ_zz, while for the p-wave magnet an off-diagonal 1/τ_yz coupling between S_y and S_z appears. For the p-wave case, the authors also provide analytical expressions for the time evolution of the spin components. The derivations rely on angular averages over a circular Fermi surface evaluated in Appendix A.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides a systematic and symmetry-informed extension of DP spin-relaxation theory to the recently proposed family of X-wave magnets. The distinction between the p-wave case, where the Néel vector along [001] induces a finite S_y–S_z coupling, and the higher-wave cases, where the relaxation matrix remains diagonal, is a concrete and falsifiable prediction that should be useful for designing spintronic devices based on altermagnetic materials. The paper is self-contained, involves no parameter fitting, and the d-wave limit reproduces an independent previous calculation after the appropriate 45° rotation. The central qualitative claim is robust to the circular-Fermi-surface approximation because the vanishing off-diagonal matrix elements are fixed by momentum-space symmetries rather than by the detailed shape of the Fermi surface.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (10)] In the (3,2) entry of the i-wave matrix, the term is printed as "- i αℏ² q_y/m", whereas the analogous entries in Eqs. (7)–(9) and the derivation in Appendix A (Eq. A6) require "- i α q_y/m". The extra ℏ² appears to be a typo and should be corrected for dimensional consistency.
[Sec. II and Appendix A] The assumptions of a circular Fermi surface and an isotropic momentum relaxation time τ are implicit in the angular averages of Appendix A but are never stated explicitly in the main text. The authors should state these assumptions before Eq. (2) and add a sentence noting that the diagonal structure for d, f, g, i is protected by the symmetries of h(k), so Fermi-surface warping that preserves those symmetries cannot generate off-diagonal relaxation rates.
[Abstract and title] The title and abstract contain formatting artifacts such as "inX-wave" and "withX=", which should be corrected in the journal version.
[Abstract] The statement that the spin relaxation rate is "proportional to the momentum relaxation time, Rashba and altermagnetic spin-split strengths" is imprecise, because the rates depend quadratically on α and Δ (and bilinearly in the p-wave cross term). Consider rewording to "depends on" or specify the quadratic dependence.
[Fig. 1 caption] The caption uses "node lines"; the standard term is "nodal lines".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-relaxation tensor structure follows from the stated Hamiltonian and the standard D'yakonov-Perel' kinetic equation, with no fitted inputs or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The central claims—the diagonal reciprocal spin-relaxation-time tensors for d-, f-, g-, and i-wave magnets and the off-diagonal 1/tau_yz coupling for the p-wave magnet with the N'eel vector along [001]—are derived by substituting each h(k) into the Hamiltonian, forming the k-dependent spin-orbit field Omega_k, and evaluating the angular averages in the standard DP kinetic equation. No parameter is fitted to the target result; the only inputs are the model parameters alpha, Delta, tau, k_F, and m, and the results follow from the explicit integrals in Appendix A. The vanishing off-diagonal elements for d, f, g, and i waves are consequences of odd angular moments such as <kx ky>, <kx k_y^2>, and related averages listed in Eq. (A1), which vanish on the assumed circular Fermi surface; the p-wave off-diagonal entry is proportional to <kx^2>, which is nonzero and produces the Sy-Sz coupling. The comparison with Ref. [39] for the d-wave case is an external literature check, not a self-citation. The few self-citations in the paper (e.g., Ref. [29] for the DP kinetic equation) appear alongside standard textbook references and are not load-bearing: the kinetic equation itself is the well-established D'yakonov-Perel' result, and the derivation would be unchanged without those citations. Accordingly, the derivation is self-contained within the stated model, and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard DP kinetic equation, the relaxation-time approximation, and a circular-Fermi-surface evaluation of angular averages. No parameters are fitted to data; alpha, Delta, m, k_F, tau are model inputs. The paper does not introduce new physical entities.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption D'yakonov-Perel' mechanism is the dominant spin relaxation process; Elliot-Yafet contribution is neglected (Sec. I and model Hamiltonian Eq. (1)).
The kinetic equation Eq. (2) is the standard DP spin diffusion equation used for noncentrosymmetric systems; this is stated in Sec. II.
domain assumption Relaxation-time approximation with a momentum-independent scattering time tau is valid (Eq. (2) and Sec. III).
The spin relaxation rates are computed to first order in this approximation; no justification for a specific scattering mechanism is given.
domain assumption Fermi surface is circular and the Fermi wave number k_F is well defined; all angular integrals are evaluated on a circle (Appendix A).
This assumption underlies the values of ⟨k_i²⟩ etc. used in the derivation; real altermagnets have anisotropic Fermi surfaces.
ad hoc to paper The spin-splitting forms h(k) in Table I for X-wave magnets are the exact momentum dependence in 2D (Table I and Sec. II).
These forms are taken from the altermagnet literature, but their use in a Hamiltonian with an added Rashba term is a model choice specific to this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin relaxation in $X$-wave magnets with $X=p, d, f, g, i$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QOVYDWFM

@misc{pith2026260717807,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin relaxation in $X$-wave magnets with $X=p, d, f, g, i$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QOVYDWFM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17807}
}

abstract

Spin relaxation results in the spin decoherence and a finite spin lifetime, which are detrimental to spintronic devices. To achieve a long spin lifetime desirable for spintronic devices, elucidating the spin relaxation mechanism and factors influencing the spin lifetime is of vital importance. Here, we investigate the spin relaxation in $X$-wave magnets ($X=p, d, f, g, i$) with Rashba spin-orbit coupling within the framework of D'yakonov-Perel' mechanism. We calculate the general matrix of the spin relaxation time for an arbitrary N\'eel vector direction of the $X$-wave magnet. As an illustration, we study the spin relaxation for the N\'eel vector along the $[001]$ direction. It is found that the reciprocal spin-relaxation-time matrices are anisotropic and diagonal for the $d$-, $f$-, $g$- and $i$-wave magnets. For the $p$-wave magnet, we derive the analytical expressions for the temporal evolution of spins. Moreover, the spin relaxation rate is proportional to the momentum relaxation time, Rashba and altermagnetic spin-split strengths for all $X$-wave magnets. Our results shine more light on the fundamental understanding of the spin relaxation mechanism in $X$-wave magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17807 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The temporal evolution of the spin components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[39]

Y . J. Sun, F. Yang, and L. Q. Chen, Spin relaxation and transport behavior ind-wave altermagnetic systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 024412 (2025)

work page 2025
[1]

M. Wu, J. Jiang, and M. Weng, Spin dynamics in semiconduc- tors, Phys. Rep.493, 61 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

Fabian and M

J. Fabian and M. W. Wu inSpintronics Handbook: Spin Trans- port and Magnetism, 2nd ed., edited by E. Y . Tsymbal and I. ˇZuti´c (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2019), pp. 303

work page 2019
[3]

ˇZuti´c, J

I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

2004
[4]

Trier, P

F. Trier, P. Noel, Joo-V on Kim, Jean-Philippe Attane, L. Vila, and M. Bibes, Oxide spin-orbitronics: spin-charge interconver- sion and topological spin textures, Nat. Rev. Mater.7, 2584 (2022)

work page 2022
[5]

Tao, Perspectives of spin-valley locking devices, Chin

L. Tao, Perspectives of spin-valley locking devices, Chin. Phys. B32, 107306 (2023). 9

work page 2023
[6]

M. I. D’yakonov and V . I. Perel’, Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors, Sov. Phys. Solid State13, 3023 (1971)

work page 1971
[7]

R. J. Elliott, Theory of the effect of spin-orbit coupling on mag- netic resonance in some semiconductors, Phys. Rev.96, 266 (1954)

work page 1954

Show all 54 references

[8]

Yafet inSolid State Physics, V ol 14, edited by F

Y . Yafet inSolid State Physics, V ol 14, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic, New York, 1963), p. 2

1963
[9]

L. L. Tao and E. Y . Tsymbal, Perspectives of spin-textured fer- roelectrics, J. Phys. D54, 113001 (2021)

2021
[10]

Schliemann, Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semi- conductor nanostructures, Rev

J. Schliemann, Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semi- conductor nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011001 (2017)

2017
[11]

Tinkham,Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics(Dover, 2003)

M. Tinkham,Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics(Dover, 2003)

2003
[12]

M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group The- ory Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter(Springer Science&Business Media, 2008)

2008
[13]

Picozzi, Spin–orbit coupling in quantum materials: emer- gent phenomena, their modelling and examples from two- dimensional magnets, Riv

S. Picozzi, Spin–orbit coupling in quantum materials: emer- gent phenomena, their modelling and examples from two- dimensional magnets, Riv. Nuovo Cim.47, 609 (2024)

2024
[14]

L. L. Tao, Spin polarization in materials described by noncen- trosymmetric and nonsymmorphic space groups, Phys. Rev. B 110, L121125 (2024)

2024
[15]

W. Knap, C. Skierbiszewski, A. Zduniak, E. Litwin- Staszewska, D. Bertho, F. Kobbi, J. L. Robert, G. E. Pikus, F. G. Pikus, S. V . Iordanskii, V . Mosser, K. Zekentes, and Yu. B. Lyanda-Geller, Weak antilocalization and spin precession in quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B53, 3912 (1996)

1996
[16]

N. S. Averkiev and L. E. Golub, Giant spin relaxation anisotropy in zinc-blende heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B60, 15582 (1999)

1999
[17]

A. A. Burkov, A. S. N ´u˜nez, and A. H. MacDonald, Theory of spin-charge-coupled transport in a two-dimensional elec- tron gas with Rashba spin-orbit interactions, Phys. Rev. B70, 155308 (2004)

2004
[18]

T. D. Stanescu and V . Galitski, Spin relaxation in a generic two-dimensional spin-orbit coupled system, Phys. Rev. B75, 125307 (2007)

2007
[19]

M. D. Mower, G. Vignale, and I. V . Tokatly, Dyakonov-Perel spin relaxation for degenerate electrons in the electron-hole liq- uid, Phys. Rev. B83, 155205 (2011)

2011
[20]

Liu and J

X. Liu and J. Sinova, Unified theory of spin dynamics in a two-dimensional electron gas with arbitrary spin-orbit coupling strength at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B86, 174301 (2012)

2012
[21]

B. A. Bernevig, J. Orenstein, and S. C. Zhang, Exact SU(2) Symmetry and Persistent Spin Helix in a Spin-Orbit Coupled System, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 236601 (2006)

2006
[22]

Kohda and G

M. Kohda and G. Salis, Physics and application of persistent spin helix state in semiconductor heterostructures, Semicond. Sci. Technol.32, 073002 (2017)

2017
[23]

L. L. Tao and E. Y . Tsymbal, Persistent spin texture enforced by symmetry, Nat. Commun.9, 2763 (2018)

2018
[24]

Lu and J

X.-Z. Lu and J. M. Rondinelli, Discovery principles and mate- rials for symmetry-protected persistent spin textures with long spin lifetimes, Matter3, 1211 (2020)

2020
[25]

H. J. Zhao, H. Nakamura, R. Arras, C. Paillard, P. Chen, J. Gosteau, X. Li, Y . Yang, and L. Bellaiche, Purely Cubic Spin Splittings with Persistent Spin Textures, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 216405 (2020)

2020
[26]

H. Li, X. Chen, Q. Zhang, M. Dou, Y . Yu, M. Ye. Zhuravlev, A. V . Nikolaev, X. Wang, and L. L. Tao, Persistent spin texture in ferroelectric Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 122903 (2024)

2024
[27]

Kilic, S.Alvarruiz, E

B. Kilic, S.Alvarruiz, E. Barts, B. van Dijk, P. Barone, and J. Sławi´nska, Universal symmetry-protected persistent spin tex- tures in noncentrosymmetric crystals. Nat. Commun.16, 7999 (2025)

2025
[28]

C.-A. Ji, L. Tao, J. M. Rondinelli, and X.-Z. Lu, Universal De- sign Principles for High-Quality Persistent Spin Textures, Adv. Funct. Mater.36, e75621 (2026)

2026
[29]

M. Dou, H. Li, and L. L. Tao, Spin relaxation in persistent spin textures, New J. Phys.26, 123005 (2024)

2024
[30]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Non- relativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[31]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[32]

L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, Y . Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

2024
[33]

S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Altermagnetism: A Chemical Perspective, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 2257 (2025)

2025
[34]

C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. Hugo Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.10, 473 (2025)

2025
[35]

Jungwirth, J

T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, R. M. Fernandes, Q. Liu, H. Watanabe, S. Murakami, S. Nakatsuji, and L. ˇSmejkal, Symmetry, mi- croscopy and spectroscopy signatures of altermagnetism. Na- ture649, 837 (2026)

2026
[36]

Hayami, Y

S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Or- dering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

2019
[37]

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020)

2020
[38]

H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

2021
[40]

Birk Hellenes, T

A. Birk Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Un- conventionalp-wave magnets, arXiv:2309.01607

arXiv
[41]

Jungwirth, R

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: an unconventional spin- ordered phase of matter, arXiv:2411.00717

arXiv
[42]

Q. Song, S. Stavri ´c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. Antonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Ergec ¸en, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of ap-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

2025
[43]

Yamada, M

R. Yamada, M. T. Birch, P. R. Baral, S. Okumura, R. Nakano, S. Gao, M. Ezawa, T. Nomoto, J. Masell, Y . Ishihara, K. K. Kolincio, I. Belopolski, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, T. Ohhara, R. Kiyanagi, T. Nakajima, Y . Tokura, T. Arima, Y . Motome, M. M. Hirschmann, and M. Hi...

2025
[44]

M. Zeng, Z. Qin, L. Qin, S. Feng, L. Wu, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Odd-parity altermagnetism: A spin group study, Phys. Rev. B113, L220412 (2026)

2026
[45]

Ezawa, Almost half-quantized planar Hall effects inX- wave magnets withX=p,d,f,g,i, Phys

M. Ezawa, Almost half-quantized planar Hall effects inX- wave magnets withX=p,d,f,g,i, Phys. Rev. B112, 235307 (2025)

2025
[46]

Ezawa, Tunneling magnetoresistance in a junction made of X-wave magnets withX=p, d, f, g, i, Phys

M. Ezawa, Tunneling magnetoresistance in a junction made of X-wave magnets withX=p, d, f, g, i, Phys. Rev. B113, 10 155303 (2026)

2026
[47]

Ezawa, Quantum geometry andX-wave magnets withX= p,d,f,g,i, Appl

M. Ezawa, Quantum geometry andX-wave magnets withX= p,d,f,g,i, Appl. Phys. Express19030101 (2026)

2026
[48]

E. I. Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an extremum loop .1. Cyclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop, Sov. Phys. Solid State2, 1109 (1960)

1960
[49]

Bihlmayer, P

G. Bihlmayer, P. Noel, D. V . Vyalikh, E. V . Chulkov, and A. Manchon, Rashba-like physics in condensed matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 642 (2022)

2022
[50]

Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys

G. Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

1955
[51]

L. G. D. da Silveira, P. Barone, and S. Picozzi, Rashba- Dresselhaus spin-splitting in the bulk ferroelectric oxide BiAlO3, Phys. Rev. B93, 245159 (2016)

2016
[52]

L. L. Tao, T. R. Paudel, A. A. Kovalev, and E. Y . Tsymbal, Reversible spin texture in ferroelectric HfO 2, Phys. Rev. B95, 245141 (2017)

2017
[53]

Sakano, M

M. Sakano, M. Hirayama, T. Takahashi, S. Akebi, M. Nakayama, K. Kuroda, K. Taguchi, T. Yoshikawa, K. Miyamoto, T. Okudaet al., Radial Spin Texture in Elemental Tellurium with Chiral Crystal Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 136404 (2020)

2020
[54]

Gatti, D

G. Gatti, D. Gos ´albez-Mart´ınez, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Fanciulli, M. Puppin, S. Polishchuk, S. Moser, L. Testa, E. Martino, S. Roth et al., Radial Spin Texture of the Weyl Fermions in Chiral Tel- lurium, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 216402 (2020)

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [39]

Y . J. Sun, F. Yang, and L. Q. Chen, Spin relaxation and transport behavior ind-wave altermagnetic systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 024412 (2025)

work page 2025

[2] [1]

M. Wu, J. Jiang, and M. Weng, Spin dynamics in semiconduc- tors, Phys. Rep.493, 61 (2010)

work page 2010

[3] [2]

Fabian and M

J. Fabian and M. W. Wu inSpintronics Handbook: Spin Trans- port and Magnetism, 2nd ed., edited by E. Y . Tsymbal and I. ˇZuti´c (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2019), pp. 303

work page 2019

[4] [3]

ˇZuti´c, J

I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

2004

[5] [4]

Trier, P

F. Trier, P. Noel, Joo-V on Kim, Jean-Philippe Attane, L. Vila, and M. Bibes, Oxide spin-orbitronics: spin-charge interconver- sion and topological spin textures, Nat. Rev. Mater.7, 2584 (2022)

work page 2022

[6] [5]

Tao, Perspectives of spin-valley locking devices, Chin

L. Tao, Perspectives of spin-valley locking devices, Chin. Phys. B32, 107306 (2023). 9

work page 2023

[7] [6]

M. I. D’yakonov and V . I. Perel’, Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors, Sov. Phys. Solid State13, 3023 (1971)

work page 1971

[8] [7]

R. J. Elliott, Theory of the effect of spin-orbit coupling on mag- netic resonance in some semiconductors, Phys. Rev.96, 266 (1954)

work page 1954