Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 72 references

Transients versus network interactions give rise to multistability through trapping mechanism

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Diffusive coupling alone can create coexisting oscillatory states in networks of excitable units that do not oscillate by themselves.

desk verdict Solid numerical demonstration that attractive coupling creates multistable oscillations in excitable units; the universal trapping-mechanism claim runs ahead of the direct evidence, but the existence result and the N=2 geometry work are worth a careful look. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14132 v1 pith:QPFLTYZY submitted 2024-11-21 math.DS nlin.CD

Kalel L. Rossi , Everton S. Medeiros , Peter Ashwin , Ulrike Feudel This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSnlin.CD MSC 34C1534C2337C2937G1537N25
keywords multistabilityexcitabledynamicsdiffusivecouplingtrappingmechanismhomoclinicbifurcationsaddle-nodeoflimitcyclesquasiperiodicattractorschaoticoscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what happens when excitable units that never oscillate on their own are coupled by an attractive diffusive interaction. It shows that the coupling can trap the units inside the excitability region of their individual state space, repeatedly reinjecting them there and turning their transient spiking into permanent oscillations. As a result, networks of two or ten units display multistability: a stable equilibrium coexists with periodic, quasiperiodic, and chaotic oscillatory attractors, all produced by the same trapping mechanism. This matters because attractive diffusive coupling is a common interaction in neuronal, ecological, and chemical networks, and the paper identifies a simple geometric mechanism by which it can generate a rich variety of coexisting behaviors.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the trapping mechanism, in which the coupling vector $\varepsilon h_i$ of a unit points across the stable manifold $W^s(x_s^{\mathrm{unc}})$ of the saddle point $x_s^{\mathrm{unc}}$ of the uncoupled local dynamics. Because the local vector field nearly vanishes near the saddle, the relative effect of the coupling is strongest there, so the trajectory crosses the stable manifold and re-enters the excitability region instead of converging to the stable node. This reinjection converts transient excitations into recurrent oscillations and is claimed to underlie all the coexisting attractors, including those born in saddle-node-of-limit-cycles and homoclinic bifurcations.

What would settle it

Project a long trajectory on the chaotic attractor of the ten-unit network onto the $(x_i, y_i)$ plane of one unit and mark each pass near the uncoupled saddle point $x_s^{\mathrm{unc}}$; if the coupling vector $\varepsilon h_i$ does not point across the stable manifold $W^s(x_s^{\mathrm{unc}})$ into the excitability region at those passes, then the trapping mechanism is not producing the chaos.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that in a network of diffusively coupled excitable neurons, the diffusive coupling can overcome the local dynamics in the slow region near the saddle point of each unit, pushing the trajectory across the stable manifold of that saddle and back into the excitability region. Once there, the unit performs a large-amplitude excitation instead of converging to the stable equilibrium; the units then repeatedly reinject each other, so the transient spiking of the uncoupled system becomes a permanent oscillation. This trapping mechanism generates the attractors regardless of the bifurcation that creates them: periodic attractors appear through either a saddle-node bifurcation of limit cycles or a homoclinic bifurcation, and the same reinjection is seen for the quasiperiodic torus. In the ten-unit network the mechanism yields up to 84 coexisting attractors for intermediate coupling strengths, including solitary states, two-unit cluster states, a torus, and a chaotically spiking state.

Load-bearing premise

The reinjection across the stable manifold is verified geometrically for two coupled units in the periodic and quasiperiodic attractors, and the paper assumes it also generates the chaotic attractor and all attractors in the ten-unit network.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A purely attractive diffusive coupling, with no repulsive or asymmetric terms, is sufficient to turn a quiescent excitable network into a multistable oscillator network.
  • For ten units, the coexisting attractors include periodic solitary states, two-unit cluster states, a quasiperiodic torus, and a chaotic state, with up to 84 attractors found at intermediate coupling strengths.
  • The same trapping mechanism is compatible with different bifurcation routes: the periodic attractors are born either in saddle-node bifurcations of limit cycles or in homoclinic bifurcations, and the torus appears via a Neimark-Sacker bifurcation.
  • The amplitude of an oscillating unit decreases as its number of neighbors grows, because a stronger coupling term pulls the trajectory away from the saddle more effectively.
  • Coupling restricted to the x-direction alone still produces the large-amplitude periodic attractor, while the asymmetric large-amplitude / small-amplitude attractors require the y-direction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trapping mechanism is generic, then any excitable system whose state space contains a saddle whose stable manifold separates a region of long transients should be able to host multistable oscillations under attractive coupling, not just the specific neuron model studied here.
  • The mechanism suggests a practical diagnostic: to decide whether experiments or simulations are seeing trapping-induced multistability, look for trajectories that spend long periods near the saddle and cross its stable manifold at each cycle.
  • The same reasoning applied to ecological metapopulations predicts that diffusive migration of prey between excitable predator-prey patches should generate coexisting oscillatory attractors of the type described here.
  • If the chaotic states indeed share the trapping mechanism, then coexistence of chaotic and regular attractors may be a robust property of excitable networks, which would affect predictions of noise-induced tipping between behavioral regimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates how attractive diffusive coupling between excitable units, each possessing only a stable equilibrium when isolated, can create multistability of oscillations. Using a Hodgkin-Huxley-type model (Eqs. (1)-(7)) with parameters from Ref. 46, the authors report coexistence of periodic, quasiperiodic, and chaotic attractors in a random N=10 network (Fig. 2) and in the N=2 case (Fig. 3), even though individual units do not oscillate. They identify a 'trapping' mechanism: near the uncoupled saddle x_s^unc, where local dynamics is slow, the diffusive coupling can overcome the local flow and reinject each unit across the stable manifold W^s(x_s^unc) into the excitability region, thereby turning transient excitable excursions into sustained oscillations. Continuation analysis (Fig. 4 and Fig. 8) characterizes the bifurcations: the LA-LA attractor arises via a saddle-node of limit cycles and is destabilized via a Neimark-Sacker (torus) bifurcation, while the LA-SA attractor arises via a homoclinic bifurcation and disappears via a saddle-node of limit cycles. The paper concludes that this reinjection mechanism is present for all observed attractors, including the chaotic one.

Significance. The existence results are supported by extensive attractor searches, Lyapunov exponent calculations, continuation analysis, and publicly available code, and they make a valuable contribution by showing that a simple linear diffusive coupling can create a rich multistable set of oscillations from non-oscillating excitable units. The N=2 case provides a concrete and well-documented example of a mechanism that has been invoked more generally, and the parameter dependence is tested in a targeted way through x-only versus y-only coupling. The main significance is conceptual: the paper proposes trapping in transient regions as a route to coupling-induced multistability, complementing earlier work on Turing/Hopf oscillations and on trapping in chaotic saddles or canards. The strengths are reproducible numerics and careful bifurcation analysis; the main weakness is that the trapping mechanism is argued qualitatively from selected trajectories rather than quantified, and the claim that the mechanism applies to the chaotic N=10 attractor is not directly verified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. IV; evidence in Sec. III A and Sec. III D] The central claim that the reinjection/trapping mechanism is present 'in all cases' (Abstract) and that all attractors 'emerge in a similar way' (Discussion) is not directly supported for the N=10 chaotic attractor. The geometric evidence in Sec. III D and Fig. 5 is restricted to N=2: the LA-LA periodic attractor at epsilon=0.065 and epsilon=0.15, the x-only-coupled LA-LA at larger epsilon_1, and the LA-SA attractor; the quasiperiodic torus is discussed only verbally. The N=10 chaotic attractor in Fig. 2I is characterized by Lyapunov exponents and a projected trajectory, but no check is shown that the coupling repeatedly reinjects each unit across W^s(x_s^unc) near the saddle. Since the chaotic attractor is desynchronized and could in principle originate from stretching/folding dynamics unrelated to the manifold geometry, the universal mechanism claim requires either a quantitative check for the chaotic/large-network case or a corresponding restriction of the claim in the abstract and discussion. This missing check is load-bearing for the paper's main explanatory claim.
  2. [Sec. III D, especially Fig. 5] The reinjection mechanism is asserted on the basis of visual inspection of selected trajectories: a trajectory 'crosses W^s(x_s^unc) in this projection' and is 'effectively reinjected' into the excitability region. As the authors correctly note, this crossing in projection is not a crossing of an invariant manifold of the coupled system. To make the claim testable and applicable uniformly to all attractors, including those in Fig. 2, the manuscript should define an operational diagnostic of reinjection—for example, the sign of the transverse component of the coupled vector field near x_s^unc, or the fraction of time each unit spends inside the excitability region compared with the uncoupled transient—and report this diagnostic for every quoted attractor. Without such a definition, 'the reinjection mechanism is present' remains an interpretation of the geometry rather than a demonstrated property.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. III A] The relation between oscillation amplitude and degree is stated inconsistently: the text first says the amplitude is inversely proportional to the number of neighbors, but later, for the quasiperiodic two-unit case, it says the amplitude is proportional to the number of neighbors. Please reconcile the wording; the earlier statement and Fig. 2 suggest the second occurrence should read 'inversely proportional'.
  2. [Sec. III D and Fig. 5] The text refers to 'Figs.3D1', 'Fig.3D2', and 'Fig.3D3' when discussing the LA-SA attractor; these should be 'Fig. 5D1', 'Fig. 5D2', and 'Fig. 5D3' to match the actual figure numbering.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'Neimarck-Sacker' should be 'Neimark-Sacker'.
  4. [Eq. (6)] The formula for m_infinity has an unmatched parenthesis: it should presumably read 1/(1+exp((m_h - x_i)/k_m)) rather than 1/(1+exp(m_h - x_i)/k_m).
  5. [Sec. IV] The phrase 'A stronger coupling coupling term' contains a duplicated word and should be corrected.
  6. [Sec. III A] The statement that 'for a range roughly between epsilon=0.05 and epsilon=0.1, more than 50 attractors can be found' is not documented by any figure or table for the N=10 case; consider adding a count curve analogous to Fig. 7 or specifying the exact range and how the count was obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the multistability results and the trapping mechanism are grounded in direct numerical simulation and bifurcation analysis, not in fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the existence of coexisting periodic, quasiperiodic, and chaotic attractors in diffusively coupled excitable units, and the geometric reinjection/trapping mechanism behind them. Both are supported by independent numerical evidence: attractors are found by integrating many initial conditions with the Attractors.jl framework, chaotic and quasiperiodic dynamics are verified with Lyapunov exponents, and the bifurcations are computed with XPPAUT continuation. The mechanism is illustrated in Fig. 5 by overlaying coupling vectors and the uncoupled stable manifold, and the dependence on coupling components is probed by varying epsilon1 and epsilon2, which provides partial independent grounding. No parameter is fitted to force the claimed outcome; the model parameters come from Izhikevich's textbook and are held fixed. The paper cites its own prior work (Refs. 49-53, 55), but those citations are contextual or methodological and are not used to justify the new mechanism, to import a uniqueness theorem, or to forbid alternative explanations. The main limitation, namely that the direct geometric check is shown for the N=2 periodic and quasiperiodic cases while the N=10 chaotic case is asserted to share the mechanism, is an evidence gap about generality rather than a circular reduction: the existence of the chaotic attractor is established independently by Lyapunov exponents and does not depend on the mechanism claim. Thus the derivation chain is not circular; at most there are a few non-load-bearing self-citations, which do not raise the circularity score beyond the lowest nonzero level.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a mechanism interpretation rather than a derivation. It introduces no new physical entities and no fitted parameters. Its claims rest on the specific model, the numerical tools, and an extrapolation from N=2 to N=10.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Hodgkin-Huxley-type model from Izhikevich (2007) is a valid representation of excitable neuronal dynamics.
    Used as the basis for the network model in Section II.A.
  • domain assumption The parameter set (I=2.0, conductances, etc.) places the uncoupled unit in the excitable regime with three equilibria as described in Figure 1.
    This is the foundation for the claimed trapping geometry; the paper states this and shows it in Figure 1.
  • domain assumption The numerical methods (Attractors.jl, XPPAUT) correctly identify all coexisting attractors and bifurcations in the studied parameter range.
    The paper relies on these tools to support the central claim; the authors acknowledge that missing small-basin attractors cannot be fully excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper The reinjection mechanism identified in the N=2 analysis extends to the N=10 network and to chaotic attractors.
    The paper asserts this generalization without direct geometric verification for the chaotic case (Section III.A and Discussion).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transients versus network interactions give rise to multistability through trapping mechanism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QPFLTYZY

@misc{pith2026241114132,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transients versus network interactions give rise to multistability through trapping mechanism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QPFLTYZY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14132}
}
read the original abstract

In networked systems, the interplay between the dynamics of individual subsystems and their network interactions has been found to generate multistability in various contexts. Despite its ubiquity, the specific mechanisms and ingredients that give rise to multistability from such interplay remain poorly understood. In a network of coupled excitable units, we show that this interplay generating multistability occurs through a competition between the units' transient dynamics and their coupling. Specifically, the diffusive coupling between the units manages to reinject them in the excitability region of their individual state space and effectively trap them there. We show that this trapping mechanism leads to the coexistence of multiple types of oscillations: periodic, quasiperiodic, and even chaotic, although the units separately do not oscillate. Interestingly, we show that the attractors emerge through different types of bifurcations - in particular, the periodic attractors emerge through either saddle-node of limit cycles bifurcations or homoclinic bifurcations - but in all cases the reinjection mechanism is present.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14132 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phase portrait of the excitable uncoupled units. The green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rich multistability arising from diffusive coupling. Panels I-H show the stable equilibrium, periodic, quasi-periodic and chaotic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Attractors created by diffusive coupling of two coupled excitable units. Each panel is a projection onto 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Continuation analysis for oscillations in two-unit case. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the trapping phenomenon. Each panel shows a projection of the full 4D state space into the subspace [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Attractors transformed or created by the diffusive coupling for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Number of attractors found for two excitable units at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Two-parameter continuation curves across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pisarchik, and Kenneth Showalter

    Ulrike Feudel, Alexander N. Pisarchik, and Kenneth Showalter. Multistability and tipping: From mathematics and physics to climate and brain - Minireview and preface to the focus issue . Chaos , 28(3):33501, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Mikail Khona and Ila R. Fiete. Attractor and integrator networks in the brain . Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 23(12):744--766, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Pisarchik and Ulrike Feudel

    Alexander N. Pisarchik and Ulrike Feudel. Control of multistability . Physics Reports , 540(4):167--218, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Motter, Seth A

    Adilson E. Motter, Seth A. Myers, Marian Anghel, and Takashi Nishikawa. Spontaneous synchrony in power-grid networks . Nature Physics , 9(3):191--197, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    The fundamental benefits of multiplexity in ecological networks

    Yu Meng, Ying-Cheng Lai, and Celso Grebogi. The fundamental benefits of multiplexity in ecological networks . Journal of the Royal Society Interface , 19(194):20220438, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Driscoll, Krishna Shenoy, and David Sussillo

    Laura N. Driscoll, Krishna Shenoy, and David Sussillo. Flexible multitask computation in recurrent networks utilizes shared dynamical motifs . Nature Neuroscience , 27(7):1349--1363, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Multistability and Delayed Recurrent Loops

    Jennifer Foss, André Longtin, Boualem Mensour, and John Milton. Multistability and Delayed Recurrent Loops . Physical Review Letters , 76(4):708--711, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Wilson and Jack D

    Hugh R. Wilson and Jack D. Cowan. Excitatory and Inhibitory Interactions in Localized Populations of Model Neurons . Biophysical Journal , 12(1):1--24, 1972

    work page 1972

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Porter, Mercedes Pascual, and Sonia Kéfi

    Shai Pilosof, Mason A. Porter, Mercedes Pascual, and Sonia Kéfi. The multilayer nature of ecological networks . Nature Ecology & Evolution , 1(4):0101, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions

    Goran Söhl, Stephan Maxeiner, and Klaus Willecke. Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions . Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 6(3):191--200, 2005

    2005

  3. [11]

    Electrical Coupling and Neuronal Synchronization in the Mammalian Brain

    Michael V.L Bennett and R.Suzanne Zukin. Electrical Coupling and Neuronal Synchronization in the Mammalian Brain . Neuron , 41(4):495--511, 2004

    2004

  4. [12]

    Tomislav Stankovski, Tiago Pereira, Peter V. E. McClintock, and Aneta Stefanovska. Coupling functions: Universal insights into dynamical interaction mechanisms . Reviews of Modern Physics , 89(4):045001, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Mathematical modeling of gap junction coupling and electrical activity in human β-cells

    Alessandro Loppini, Matthias Braun, Simonetta Filippi, and Morten Gram Pedersen. Mathematical modeling of gap junction coupling and electrical activity in human β-cells . Physical Biology , 12(6):066002, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Kepler, Eve Marder, and L

    Thomas B. Kepler, Eve Marder, and L. F. Abbott. The Effect of Electrical Coupling on the Frequency of Model Neuronal Oscillators . Science , 248(4951):83--85, 1990

    1990

  7. [15]

    Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems

    Bernd Blasius, Amit Huppert, and Lewi Stone. Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems . Nature , 399(6734):354--359, 1999

    1999

  8. [16]

    Medeiros, Ulrike Feudel, and Anna Zakharova

    Everton S. Medeiros, Ulrike Feudel, and Anna Zakharova. Asymmetry-induced order in multilayer networks . Physical Review E , 104(2):024302, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    A multi-species approach for protected areas ecological network construction based on landscape connectivity

    Guofu Liang, Hanbo Niu, and Yan Li. A multi-species approach for protected areas ecological network construction based on landscape connectivity . Global Ecology and Conservation , 46:e02569, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Farnsworth

    Alexander Sadykov and Keith D. Farnsworth. Model of two competing populations in two habitats with migration: Application to optimal marine protected area size . Theoretical Population Biology , 142:114--122, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Overview of coupled map lattices

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Overview of coupled map lattices . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 2(3):279--282, 1992

    1992

  12. [20]

    Arthur T. Winfree. The Geometry of Biological Time . Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. Springer New York, NY, 2 edition, 1980

    1980

  13. [21]

    Arthur T. Winfree. Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators . Journal of Theoretical Biology , 16(1):15--42, 1967

    1967

  14. [22]

    Generalized splay states in phase oscillator networks

    Rico Berner, Serhiy Yanchuk, Yuri Maistrenko, and Eckehard Schöll. Generalized splay states in phase oscillator networks . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31(7):073128, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Science , volume 70

    Arkady Pikovsky, Michael Rosenblum, and Jürgen Kurths. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Science , volume 70. Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  16. [24]

    Rodrigues, Thomas K.D.M

    Francisco A. Rodrigues, Thomas K.D.M. Peron, Peng Ji, and Jürgen Kurths. The Kuramoto model in complex networks . Physics Reports , 610:1--98, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Synchronization and multistability in a network of diffusively coupled laser models

    Mahtab Mehrabbeik, Sajad Jafari, Riccardo Meucci, and Matjaž Perc. Synchronization and multistability in a network of diffusively coupled laser models . Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation , 125:107380, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Spatiotemporal Intermittency in Coupled Map Lattices

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Spatiotemporal Intermittency in Coupled Map Lattices . Progress of Theoretical Physics , 74(5):1033--1044, 1985

    1985

  19. [27]

    Global traveling wave triggered by local phase slips

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Global traveling wave triggered by local phase slips . Physical Review Letters , 69(6):905--908, 1992

    1992

  20. [28]

    Volkov, and Jordi García-Ojalvo

    Ekkehard Ullner, Alexei Zaikin, Evgenii I. Volkov, and Jordi García-Ojalvo. Multistability and Clustering in a Population of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators via Phase-Repulsive Cell-to-Cell Communication . Physical Review Letters , 99(14):148103, 2007

    2007

  21. [29]

    Multistability of synthetic genetic networks with repressive cell-to-cell communication

    Ekkehard Ullner, Aneta Koseska, Jürgen Kurths, Evgenii Volkov, Holger Kantz, and Jordi García-Ojalvo. Multistability of synthetic genetic networks with repressive cell-to-cell communication . Physical Review E , 78(3):031904, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Rossi, Roberto C

    Kalel L. Rossi, Roberto C. Budzinski, Bruno R. R. Boaretto, Lyle E. Muller, and Ulrike Feudel. Shifts in global network dynamics due to small changes at single nodes . Physical Review Research , 5(1):013220, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Yanagita, T

    T. Yanagita, T. Ichinomiya, and Y. Oyama. Pair of excitable FitzHugh-Nagumo elements: Synchronization, multistability, and chaos . Physical Review E , 72(5):056218, 2005

    2005

  24. [32]

    Oscillation quenching mechanisms: Amplitude vs

    Aneta Koseska, Evgeny Volkov, and Jürgen Kurths. Oscillation quenching mechanisms: Amplitude vs. oscillation death . Physics Reports , 531(4):173--199, 2013

    2013

  25. [33]

    Experimental and theoretical studies of a coupled chemical oscillator: phase death, multistability and in-phase and out-of-phase entrainment

    Michael F Crowley and Irving R Epstein. Experimental and theoretical studies of a coupled chemical oscillator: phase death, multistability and in-phase and out-of-phase entrainment . The Journal of Physical Chemistry , 93(6):2496--2502, 1989

    1989

  26. [34]

    Chaotic dynamics of two coupled biochemical oscillators

    Olaf Sporns, Siegfried Roth, and Friedrich Franz Seelig. Chaotic dynamics of two coupled biochemical oscillators . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 26(1-3):215--224, 1987

    1987

  27. [35]

    Aronson, E.J

    D.G. Aronson, E.J. Doedel, and H.G. Othmer. An analytical and numerical study of the bifurcations in a system of linearly-coupled oscillators . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 25(1-3):20--104, 1987

    1987

  28. [36]

    Antonopoulos

    Arnab Mondal, Argha Mondal, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Ranjit Kumar Upadhyay, and Chris G. Antonopoulos. Spatiotemporal characteristics in systems of diffusively coupled excitable slow–fast FitzHugh–Rinzel dynamical neurons . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science...

    2021

  29. [37]

    Self-induced switchings between multiple space-time patterns on complex networks of excitable units

    Gerrit Ansmann, Klaus Lehnertz, and Ulrike Feudel. Self-induced switchings between multiple space-time patterns on complex networks of excitable units . Physical Review X , 6(1):011030, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Dominance of Milnor Attractors and Noise-Induced Selection in a Multiattractor System

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Dominance of Milnor Attractors and Noise-Induced Selection in a Multiattractor System . Physical Review Letters , 78(14):2736--2739, 1997

    1997

  31. [39]

    Chaotic traveling waves in a coupled map lattice

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Chaotic traveling waves in a coupled map lattice . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 68(3-4):299--317, 1993

    1993

  32. [40]

    Ulrike Feudel, Celso Grebogi, Leon Poon, and James A. Yorke. Dynamical properties of a simple mechanical system with a large number of coexisting periodic attractors . Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , 9(1-2):171--180, 1998

    1998

  33. [41]

    The chemical basis of morphogenesis

    Alan Mathison Turing. The chemical basis of morphogenesis . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences , 237(641):37--72, 1952

    1952

  34. [42]

    S. Smale. A Mathematical Model of Two Cells Via Turing's Equation , pages 354--367. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1976

    1976

  35. [43]

    On diffusion driven oscillations in coupled dynamical systems

    Alexander Pogromsky, Torkel Glad, and Henk Numeijer. On diffusion driven oscillations in coupled dynamical systems . International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , 9(04):629--644, 1999

    1999

  36. [44]

    Kocarev and P.A

    L.M. Kocarev and P.A. Janjic. On Turing instability in two diffusely coupled systems . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications , 42(10):779--784, 1995

    1995

  37. [45]

    Queiroz, and Dmitry Turaev

    Eddie Nijholt, Tiago Pereira, Fernando C. Queiroz, and Dmitry Turaev. Chaotic Behavior in Diffusively Coupled Systems . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 401(3):2715--2756, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Dynamical systems in neuroscience

    Eugene M Izhikevich. Dynamical systems in neuroscience . MIT press, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    Robert Ronge and Michael A. Zaks. Splay states and two-cluster states in ensembles of excitable units . The European Physical Journal Special Topics , 230(14-15):2717--2724, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Monte Carlo basin bifurcation analysis

    Maximilian Gelbrecht, Jürgen Kurths, and Frank Hellmann. Monte Carlo basin bifurcation analysis . New Journal of Physics , 22(3):033032, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Medeiros, Rene O

    Everton S. Medeiros, Rene O. Medrano-T, Iberê L. Caldas, and Ulrike Feudel. Boundaries of synchronization in oscillator networks . Physical Review E , 98(3):030201, 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Medeiros, Rene O

    Everton S. Medeiros, Rene O. Medrano-T, Iberê L. Caldas, Tamás Tél, and Ulrike Feudel. State-dependent vulnerability of synchronization . Physical Review E , 100(5):052201, 2019. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2019

  43. [51]

    The impact of chaotic saddles on the synchronization of complex networks of discrete-time units

    Everton Medeiros, Rene Medrano-T, Ibere Caldas, and Ulrike Feudel. The impact of chaotic saddles on the synchronization of complex networks of discrete-time units . Journal of Physics: Complexity , 2(3):035002, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Medeiros, Anna Zakharova, Philipp Hövel, and Igor Franović

    Max Contreras, Everton S. Medeiros, Anna Zakharova, Philipp Hövel, and Igor Franović. Scale-free avalanches in arrays of FitzHugh–Nagumo oscillators . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 33(9):093106, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Medeiros, Oleh Omel’chenko, and Ulrike Feudel

    Everton S. Medeiros, Oleh Omel’chenko, and Ulrike Feudel. Transient chimera states emerging from dynamical trapping in chaotic saddles . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 33(9):093130, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Morris and H

    C. Morris and H. Lecar. Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber . Biophysical Journal , 35(1):193--213, 1981

    1981

  47. [55]

    Framework for global stability analysis of dynamical systems

    George Datseris, Kalel Luiz Rossi, and Alexandre Wagemakers. Framework for global stability analysis of dynamical systems . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 33(7):073151, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    bSTAB: an open-source software for computing the basin stability of multi-stable dynamical systems

    Merten Stender and Norbert Hoffmann. bSTAB: an open-source software for computing the basin stability of multi-stable dynamical systems . Nonlinear Dynamics , pages 1--18, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing

    Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B Shah. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing . SIAM Review , 59(1):65--98, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Effortless estimation of basins of attraction

    George Datseris and Alexandre Wagemakers. Effortless estimation of basins of attraction . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 32(2):023104, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Simulating, Analyzing, and Animating Dynamical Systems

    Bard Ermentrout. Simulating, Analyzing, and Animating Dynamical Systems . Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2002

    2002

  52. [60]

    DifferentialEquations.jl – A Performant and Feature-Rich Ecosystem for Solving Differential Equations in Julia

    Christopher Rackauckas and Qing Nie. DifferentialEquations.jl – A Performant and Feature-Rich Ecosystem for Solving Differential Equations in Julia . Journal of Open Research Software , 5(1):15, 2016

    2016

  53. [61]

    DynamicalSystems.jl: A Julia software library for chaos and nonlinear dynamics

    George Datseris. DynamicalSystems.jl: A Julia software library for chaos and nonlinear dynamics . Journal of Open Source Software , 3(23):598, 2018. Publisher: The Open Journal

    2018

  54. [62]

    DrWatson: the perfect sidekick for your scientific inquiries

    George Datseris, Jonas Isensee, Sebastian Pech, and Tamás Gál. DrWatson: the perfect sidekick for your scientific inquiries . Journal of Open Source Software , 5(54):2673, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for Julia

    Simon Danisch and Julius Krumbiegel. Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for Julia . Journal of Open Source Software , 6(65):3349, 2021

    2021

  56. [64]

    Kalel L. Rossi. Repository MultistabilityThroTrapping . Github Repository , 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Mechanism of solitary state appearance in an ensemble of nonlocally coupled Lozi maps

    Nadezhda Semenova, Tatyana Vadivasova, and Vadim Anishchenko. Mechanism of solitary state appearance in an ensemble of nonlocally coupled Lozi maps . The European Physical Journal Special Topics , 227(10-11):1173--1183, 2018

    2018

  58. [66]

    Solitary states for coupled oscillators with inertia

    Patrycja Jaros, Serhiy Brezetsky, Roman Levchenko, Dawid Dudkowski, Tomasz Kapitaniak, and Yuri Maistrenko. Solitary states for coupled oscillators with inertia . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 28(1):011103, 2018

    2018

  59. [67]

    Rybalova, V

    E. Rybalova, V. S. Anishchenko, G. I. Strelkova, and A. Zakharova. Solitary states and solitary state chimera in neural networks . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 29(7):071106, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Network-induced multistability through lossy coupling and exotic solitary states

    Frank Hellmann, Paul Schultz, Patrycja Jaros, Roman Levchenko, Tomasz Kapitaniak, Jürgen Kurths, and Yuri Maistrenko. Network-induced multistability through lossy coupling and exotic solitary states . Nature Communications , 11(1):592, 2020

    2020

  61. [69]

    Solitary states in adaptive nonlocal oscillator networks

    Rico Berner, Alicja Polanska, Eckehard Schöll, and Serhiy Yanchuk. Solitary states in adaptive nonlocal oscillator networks . The European Physical Journal Special Topics , 229(12-13):2183--2203, 2020

    2020

  62. [70]

    Medeiros, and Anna Zakharova

    Leonhard Schülen, Maria Mikhailenko, Everton S. Medeiros, and Anna Zakharova. Solitary states in complex networks: impact of topology . The European Physical Journal Special Topics , 231(22-23):4123--4130, 2022

    2022

  63. [71]

    Tyson and S

    J. Tyson and S. Kauffman. Control of mitosis by a continuous biochemical oscillation: Synchronization; spatially inhomogeneous oscillations . Journal of Mathematical Biology , 1(4):289--310, 1975

    1975

  64. [72]

    J. E. Truscott and J. Brindley. Ocean Plankton Populations As Excitable Media . Bulletin of Mathematical Biology , 56(5):981--998, 1994

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.