Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 26 references

Essential tori in 3-manifolds not detected in any characteristic

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs infinitely many closed 3-manifolds whose unique essential surface is a torus, and proves this torus is not detected by ideal points of the variety of SL2(F)-characters for any algebraically closed field F.

desk verdict New explicit families show essential tori can be undetected by SL2(F)-character varieties over every algebraically closed field, with characteristic 2 playing a special role; the paper is solid but has an internal inconsistency in Section 5.4 and leans on a self-cited preprint for the foundational theory. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15680 v1 pith:QTKA7NA6 submitted 2024-11-24 math.GT

Grace S. Garden , Benjamin Martin , Stephan Tillmann This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GT MSC 57M0557K3157K3520C99
keywords 3-manifoldcharactervarietydetectedsurfaceessentialtoruspositivecharacteristicgraphmanifoldSeifertfiberedspaceCuller-Shalentheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether every essential surface in a compact 3-manifold can be detected by an ideal point of the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-character variety for some algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$, and answers no in a strong way. It constructs an infinite family of closed graph manifolds $N_\Phi$ by gluing the twisted interval bundle over the Klein bottle to the complement of the right-handed trefoil along matrices $\Phi\in\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$. In one subfamily, each $N_\Phi$ contains, up to isotopy, exactly one connected essential surface, a torus, and that torus is not detected by $X(N_\Phi,\mathbb{F})$ for any algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$. Other subfamilies show the phenomenon is sensitive to characteristic: the same torus can be detected exactly when $\mathbb{F}$ has characteristic 2, while another family has a genus-two surface detected in every characteristic alongside a torus detected in none. These examples show that the ideal-point detection method, extended to every characteristic, still misses essential surfaces and cannot be repaired by changing the field.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the variety of $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-characters $X(M,\mathbb{F})$ of a 3-manifold group over an algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$, together with its ideal points. The carrying mechanism is the ideal-point detection machine (Culler--Shalen theory): an ideal point $\xi$ of a curve $C$ defines a discrete valuation $v_\xi$ on trace functions, produces a Bass--Serre tree $T_\xi$ on which $\pi_1(M)$ acts, and any essential surface obtained from the corresponding splitting is said to be detected. For the two building blocks the character varieties are explicit small curves, $X_{\mathrm{irr}}(K\tilde{\times}I,\mathbb{F})=\{(0,t,0)\mid t\in\mathbb{F}\}$ and $X_{\mathrm{irr}}(M,\mathbb{F})=\{(s,s,1)\mid s\in\mathbb{F}\}$, and the gluing relations add the fourteen trace coordinates $(t_a,t_b,t_g,t_h,t_{ab},\ldots)$ of the generated group. The decisive technical work is computing, for each family of gluing matrices $\Phi$, which curves appear and whether $v_\xi(I_\gamma)<0$ for elements $\gamma$ in the complementary pieces of a candidate surface; this determines exactly which of the surfaces (S1)--(S5) is detected by which ideal point.

What would settle it

Take a manifold from the Theorem 1 family, for example $\Phi=\begin{pmatrix}1+6k&k\\6&1\end{pmatrix}$ with one fixed integer $k$, and compute the full variety of $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-characters over $\mathbb{F}_2$ and over $\mathbb{C}$; if any ideal point exists whose trace valuations on both components of $N_\Phi\setminus T$ are nonnegative, that ideal point would detect the torus $T$ and falsify the theorem. A more direct check is to test the companion preprint's three key statements; failure of Corollary 7, Lemma 8, or Proposition 10 for some algebraically closed field of positive characteristic would also invalidate the non-detection claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1: there are infinitely many closed graph manifolds $N_\Phi$ each containing, up to isotopy, exactly one connected essential surface; that surface is a torus; and it is not detected by the variety of $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-characters for any algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$. The proof classifies all connected essential surfaces in the glued manifolds, reducing them to the splitting torus $T$, the two genus-two surfaces $S_2$ and $S_3$, and the vertical tori $S_4(q,r)$ and $S_5$. It then computes the character variety of $N_\Phi$ from those of the two building blocks, whose irreducible and reducible curves are explicit: for the Klein bottle piece $X_{\mathrm{irr}}(K\tilde{\times}I,\mathbb{F})=\{(0,t,0)\mid t\in\mathbb{F}\}$, and for the trefoil piece $X_{\mathrm{irr}}(M,\mathbb{F})=\{(s,s,1)\mid s\in\mathbb{F}\}$. Detection and non-detection are decided by trace-function valuations at ideal points: a pole of a peripheral trace function forces a boundary slope, while constant traces rule a surface out. The non-detection theorem follows because, for the chosen families of gluing matrices, every curve in $X(N_\Phi,\mathbb{F})$ has the form listed in cases (C1)--(C3), and none produces the valuations needed to detect $T$; in the other families, exactly the characteristic-2 curves do.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the extension of ideal-point detection theory to arbitrary algebraically closed fields, developed in the companion preprint and quoted as Corollary 7, Lemma 8, and Proposition 10, is fully correct; if trace equality does not characterize closure-equivalence, or if the commutator trace criterion or the ideal-point splitting theorem fails in positive characteristic, the conclusion that the exhibited tori are undetected in every characteristic no longer follows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the undetected family of Theorem 1, $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-character detection fails in every characteristic, so the question of detecting all essential surfaces by character varieties has a negative answer without any characteristic caveat.
  • Theorems 2, 3, and 5 provide manifolds whose torus is detected over $\mathbb{F}$ if and only if $\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F})=2$, so positive characteristic can create detected surfaces that the complex character variety does not see.
  • Theorem 4 shows that in one graph manifold a non-separating genus-two surface is detected in every characteristic, because it is Poincaré dual to an epimorphism to $\mathbb{Z}$, while the companion torus is detected in none.
  • Theorem 6 gives Seifert fibered spaces with infinitely many pairwise non-isotopic essential tori, all detected in every characteristic; vertical tori in these manifolds are numerous enough that the character variety detects the whole infinite family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction suggests a 'characteristic selector' phenomenon: choosing the gluing matrix $\Phi$ appears to determine both which essential surfaces occur and in which characteristic they become detectable; this may generalize to other gluings of Seifert pieces with two boundary slopes.
  • The 2-dimensional component $C_\Phi$ and its subcurves $C(u,v)$ indicate a systematic relation between trace valuations on $S_4(q,r)$ and the parameters $(u,v)$; if Conjecture 18 holds, the detection pattern for all vertical tori in the $S^2(2,2,2,3)$ family would be completely understood.
  • Because the Klein bottle group admits no faithful representation into $\mathrm{SL}_2(K)$ over any field $K$, the examples suggest that failure of faithful linearity of the fundamental group may be the underlying reason some tori are invisible; the paper does not itself advance this explanation.
  • The authors' remark lists three infinite families of coprime pairs $(q,r)$ for which Conjecture 18 can be proved; checking further pairs by the same trace-valuation computation is a concrete way to test whether all $S_4(q,r)$ are detected.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs closed orientable 3-manifolds N_Φ by gluing the twisted I-bundle over the Klein bottle to the complement of the right-handed trefoil along a torus via Φ ∈ SL_2(Z). For each such manifold the authors classify the connected essential surfaces up to isotopy and study which of them are detected by ideal points of curves in the variety of SL_2(F)-characters for arbitrary algebraically closed fields F. The main results exhibit infinite families in which: a single essential torus is never detected in any characteristic (Theorem 1); a single essential torus is detected exactly in characteristic 2 (Theorem 2); a torus and a genus-two surface are both detected exactly in characteristic 2 (Theorem 3); a torus is never detected while a non-separating genus-two surface is always detected (Theorem 4); and Seifert fibered examples contain vertical tori with characteristic-dependent or uniform detection behaviour (Theorems 5 and 6).

Significance. If the main results are correct, they provide the first infinite families of closed 3-manifolds with essential surfaces that evade detection by SL_2-character varieties over every algebraically closed field, and also examples where switching to characteristic 2 improves detection. This is a meaningful contribution to the study of Culler-Shalen theory in positive characteristic. The paper is built on explicit matrix computations, a complete classification of essential surfaces in the constructed manifolds, and concrete families of gluing matrices, which are valuable assets. The main caveat is that the detection arguments rely on the authors' companion preprint [11] for the positive-characteristic extension of Culler-Shalen theory, so the unconditional status of the theorems depends on that work.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.4 and §5.3] The graph-manifold condition stated in §5.4, 'm ≠ ±6 ≠ n', is inconsistent with the families used in Theorems 1 and 2. The family Φ_k = [[1+6k, k], [6, 1]] has m = 6, and the family Φ'_k = [[k, 1+6k], [-1, -6]] has n = -6; both are claimed to be graph manifolds. The correct condition should exclude precisely the two Seifert fibered families, namely Φ = [[k, ±1], [∓1-6k, ∓6]] and Φ = [[±1, l], [∓6, ±1-6l]]. As written, the condition misclassifies the examples and therefore the graph-manifold assertions in Theorems 1-4 need to be corrected.
  2. [§5.1 (S4), §5.3, §5.5] The matrix family for the Seifert fibered case with base S^2(2,2,2,3) is misstated. The displayed family Φ = [[k, ±1], [∓1, -6k ∓6]] is not in SL_2(Z) for arbitrary k; for example, with k=1 and one choice of signs the determinant is -11. Moreover, the proof of Lemma 14 itself says that the gluing equation 'requires n = -6l', which gives n = ∓6 and m = ∓1 - 6k, not the displayed entries. The correct family should be Φ = [[k, ±1], [∓1-6k, ∓6]]. This mistake propagates to Lemmas 14, 15, and 17 and to Theorem 6, even though the computations inside the proofs appear to use the correct condition n = -6l.
  3. [§2.3, Proposition 10] The detection results in Section 5 depend on the full positive-characteristic Culler-Shalen framework of the preprint [11], specifically Corollary 7, Lemma 8, and Proposition 10. Proposition 10 is quoted from [22, Property 5.4.2] with the note that the proof applies verbatim, but [22] works over C and uses the identification of the character variety with the GIT quotient R//SL_2, which §2.1 explicitly notes may fail in positive characteristic. If Proposition 10 or Lemma 8 fails in characteristic 2, the conclusions that the exhibited tori are undetected in every characteristic would not follow. The authors should either include a proof of the positive-characteristic statements needed here or clearly state that the main theorems are conditional on the companion preprint [11] being available and correct.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1] The sentence 'We write F = F_p if we want to emphasise the characteristic' is confusing because F already denotes an algebraically closed field; the finite field of p elements is usually denoted F_p and should not be conflated with the algebraic closure.
  2. [§3] After Equation (3.5), the text says the matrix pair 'splits into infinitely many conjugacy classes'; it would be helpful to state explicitly that these conjugacy classes are not distinguished by the character, since the character variety is the quotient by closure equivalence rather than by conjugacy.
  3. [§5.3] In the proofs of Lemmas 14 and 15, the phrase 'so it is of is of type (C3)' contains a duplicated word and should read 'so it is of type (C3)'.
  4. [§5.5, Lemma 17] The 2-dimensional component C_Φ appears in both Lemma 14's proof and Lemma 17's proof with identical definitions; the paper could refer back to Equation (5.6) instead of restating the full coordinate expression in Equation (5.10).
  5. [Theorem 6 and Remark after it] The remark that Theorem 6 is not proved for all essential tori in the stated Seifert fibered manifolds is useful and should be incorporated into the theorem statement so that the scope of the claim is unambiguous.
  6. [Introduction and References] The paper relies on the unpublished companion works [11] and [17]; a sentence in the introduction stating this dependence explicitly would help readers assess the conditional nature of the results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main results are explicit trace computations on constructed manifolds, and the self-cited foundations are general and do not encode the target manifolds.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is direct and self-contained in the relevant sense. It constructs explicit graph manifolds and Seifert fibered spaces N_Phi by gluing a twisted I-bundle over the Klein bottle to the trefoil complement, classifies the essential surfaces using standard 3-manifold topology (Jaco, Hatcher, Schultens), and then computes explicit curves in the variety of SL_2(F)-characters, using trace valuations to decide which surfaces are detected. No equation defining the main objects is stated in terms of the conclusions, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the families in Theorems 1 and 2 are chosen so that the relevant gluing matrices do or do not satisfy the explicitly derived detection conditions of Lemmas 14 and 15. The only self-citations of note are [9] (the Klein bottle group admits no faithful SL_2(K) representation) and [11] (the extension of Culler-Shalen theory to arbitrary algebraically closed fields). Both are general, parameter-free results whose assumptions do not include the specific manifolds N_Phi or the undetection claims; in particular, [11] supplies the trace/closures equivalence, the commutator reducibility criterion, and the ideal-point splitting statement, and Proposition 10 is additionally traced to Shalen [22] with the proof asserted to apply verbatim. Accordingly, these citations are real supporting evidence rather than circular re-imports of the paper's own conclusions. The dependence on the unverified positive-characteristic theory in [11] is a legitimate correctness risk, but it is not a circularity: the present paper's computations would be meaningful conditional on that foundation and do not reduce to it by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard 3-manifold topology, on the Culler-Shalen detection theory over arbitrary fields (largely from the self-authored preprint [11]), and on explicit matrix computations. No free parameters are fitted to data; the integer entries of the gluing matrices are construction parameters. No new entities such as particles or mediators are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Culler-Shalen detection theorem over arbitrary algebraically closed fields (Proposition 10, from [11] and [22])
    The association of essential surfaces to ideal points of curves in X(M,F) is imported from [11] and [22]; it is the core detection mechanism and is not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Trace equality characterizes closure equivalence over arbitrary fields (Corollary 7, from [11])
    This justifies identifying X(Γ,F) with the quotient by closure equivalence and using trace coordinates; cited from the self-authored preprint [11].
  • domain assumption Commutator trace criterion: A and B generate a reducible subgroup iff tr[A,B]=2 (Lemma 8, from [11])
    Used repeatedly to separate irreducible and reducible representations and to compute reducible character varieties; cited from [11].
  • domain assumption Klein bottle group representation classification (Proposition 13, from [9])
    The structural description of all SL2(K) representations of the Klein bottle group is taken from [9], which has overlapping authorship; it underpins the case analysis in Section 3.
  • standard math Hatcher's classification of essential surfaces in Seifert fibered spaces and Schultens' correspondence for vertical surfaces
    Used in Sections 3-5 to enumerate all essential surfaces in the twisted I-bundle, the trefoil complement, and the resulting Seifert fibered manifolds.
  • standard math GIT quotient and finite generation of the trace ring over algebraically closed fields
    Needed to define X(Γ,F) and its irreducible and reducible subvarieties; partly from [16] and from the in-preparation [17] by a co-author.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Essential tori in 3-manifolds not detected in any characteristic." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QTKA7NA6

@misc{pith2026241115680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Essential tori in 3-manifolds not detected in any characteristic},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QTKA7NA6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15680}
}
abstract

Infinite families of 3-dimensional closed graph manifolds and closed Seifert fibered spaces are exhibited, each member of which contains an essential torus not detected by ideal points of the variety of $\text{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-characters over any algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15680 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Generators for the twisted I–bundle over the Klein bottle. The following result is proven in [9]. Proposition 13 ([9]) Let K be a field and ΓK the Klein bottle group as in Equation (3.1). Suppose σ : ΓK → SL2(K) is a representation. If σ(b) ̸= ±E, then one of the following occurs: 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Essential annuli in the twisted I–bundle over the Klein bottle. We note from the above calculations that in any characteristic p ≥ 0, the variety X irr(Kט I,F) is a curve with a single ideal point, and X red(Kט I,F) consists of either a single curve with a single ideal point (if p = 2) or two disjoint curves, each with a single ideal point (if p ̸= 2). The peripheral subgroup for ΓKט I is PKט I = ⟨a 2 ,b⟩. The t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Generators of the trefoil complement and elements in complementary regions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Separating genus-2 surface arising in S 2 (2,2,2,3) from S2 . (a) S4(0,1) (b) S4(1,1) (c) S4(2,1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example tori arising in S 2 (2,2,2,3) from S4(q,r). where l ∈ Z arbitrary. All resulting manifolds NΦ are graph manifolds and not Seifert fibered. Any copy of B in Kט I matches up with two parallel copies of the Seifert surface in M giving a connected surface. Since B…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example arcs for a general tori arising in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Garden and Stephan Tillmann

    Grace S. Garden and Stephan Tillmann. An invitation to Culler-Shalen theory in arbitrary characteristic. preprint,

    work page

  2. [22]

    Peter B. Shalen. Representations of 3–manifold groups. In Handbook of geometric topology , pages 955–1044. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002. 3, 4, 5, 6

    work page 2002

  3. [1]

    3–manifold groups

    Matthias Aschenbrenner, Stefan Friedl, and Henry Wilton. 3–manifold groups. EMS Series of Lectures in Math- ematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨urich, 2015. 8

    work page 2015

  4. [2]

    Ideal points of character varieties, algebraic non-integral representations, and undetected closed essential surfaces in 3–manifolds

    Alex Casella, Charles Katerba, and Stephan Tillmann. Ideal points of character varieties, algebraic non-integral representations, and undetected closed essential surfaces in 3–manifolds. Proc. Amer . Math. Soc., 148(5):2257– 2271, 2020. 1

    work page 2020

  5. [3]

    Closed surfaces and character varieties

    Eric Chesebro. Closed surfaces and character varieties. Algebraic and Geometry Topology, 13:2001–2037, 2013. 1

    work page 2001

  6. [4]

    Not all boundary slopes are strongly detected by the character variety

    Eric Chesebro and Stephan Tillmann. Not all boundary slopes are strongly detected by the character variety. Communications in Analysis and Geometry , 15(4):695–723, 2007. 1

    work page 2007

  7. [5]

    Gordon, John Luecke, and Peter B

    Marc Culler, Cameron McA. Gordon, John Luecke, and Peter B. Shalen. Dehn surgery on knots. Ann. of Math. (2), 125(2):237–300, 1987. 6

    work page 1987

  8. [6]

    Marc Culler and Peter B. Shalen. Varieties of group representations and splittings of 3–manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2), 117(1):109–146, 1983. 1

    work page 1983

Show all 26 references
  1. [7]

    Dunfield and Stavros Garoufalidis

    Nathan M. Dunfield and Stavros Garoufalidis. Incompressibility criteria for spun-normal surfaces. Trans. Amer . Math. Soc., 364(11):6109–6137, 2012. 1

    2012

  2. [8]

    A primer on mapping class groups

    Benson Farb and Dan Margalit. A primer on mapping class groups . Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2012. 12

    2012

  3. [9]

    Linear representations of 3–manifold groups over rings

    Stefan Friedl, Montek Gill, and Stephan Tillmann. Linear representations of 3–manifold groups over rings. Proc. Amer . Math. Soc., 146(11):4951–4966, 2018. 6

    2018

  4. [10]

    Representation varieties detect essential surfaces

    Stefan Friedl, Takahiro Kitayama, and Matthias Nagel. Representation varieties detect essential surfaces. Math. Res. Lett., 25(3):803–817, 2018. 1

    2018

  5. [12]

    Character varieties of higher dimensional representations and splittings of 3–manifolds

    Takashi Hara and Takahiro Kitayama. Character varieties of higher dimensional representations and splittings of 3–manifolds. Geometriae Dedicata, 213:433–466, 2021. 1

    2021

  6. [13]

    Notes on basic 3–manifold topology

    Allen Hatcher. Notes on basic 3–manifold topology. http://www.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher, 2007. 5, 9

    2007

  7. [14]

    3 -Manifolds

    John Hempel. 3 -Manifolds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1976. Ann. of Math. Studies, No. 86. 5

    1976

  8. [15]

    Lectures on three–manifold topology , volume 43 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathe- matics

    William Jaco. Lectures on three–manifold topology , volume 43 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathe- matics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1980. 4

    1980

  9. [16]

    Reductive subgroups of reductive groups in nonzero characteristic

    Benjamin Martin. Reductive subgroups of reductive groups in nonzero characteristic. J. Algebra, 262(2):265–286,

  10. [17]

    G–equivariant inclusions and character varieties

    Benjamin Martin. G–equivariant inclusions and character varieties. in preparation, 2024. 3

    2024

  11. [18]

    John W. Morgan. The Smith conjecture. In The Smith conjecture (New York, 1979) , volume 112 of Pure Appl. Math., pages 3–6. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984. 1

    1979

  12. [19]

    Detection of essential surfaces in 3–manifolds with SL 2 –trees

    Stephen Schanuel and Xingru Zhang. Detection of essential surfaces in 3–manifolds with SL 2 –trees. Math. Ann., 320(1):149–165, 2001. 1

    2001

  13. [20]

    Kakimizu complexes of Seifert fibered spaces

    Jennifer Schultens. Kakimizu complexes of Seifert fibered spaces. Algebr . Geom. Topol., 18(5):2897–2918, 2018. 5, 12

    2018

  14. [21]

    Detection of incompressible surfaces in hyperbolic punctured torus bundles

    Henry Segerman. Detection of incompressible surfaces in hyperbolic punctured torus bundles. Geom. Dedicata, 150:181–232, 2011. 1 22

    2011

  15. [23]

    Stallings

    John R. Stallings. A topological proof of Grushko’s theorem on free products. Math. Z., 90:1–8, 1965. 6

    1965

  16. [24]

    Character varieties of mutative 3–manifolds

    Stephan Tillmann. Character varieties of mutative 3–manifolds. Algebr . Geom. Topol., 4:133–149, 2004. 1

    2004

  17. [25]

    Degenerations of ideal hyperbolic triangulations

    Stephan Tillmann. Degenerations of ideal hyperbolic triangulations. Math. Z., 272(3-4):793–823, 2012. 1

    2012

  18. [26]

    On ideal points of deformation curves of hyperbolic 3–manifolds with one cusp

    Tomoyoshi Yoshida. On ideal points of deformation curves of hyperbolic 3–manifolds with one cusp. Topology, 30(2):155–170, 1991. 1 Grace S. Garden School of Mathematics and Statistics F07, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia grace.garden@sydney.edu.au —– Benjamin Mar...

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.