Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The k-Robinson-Foulds Dissimilarity Measures for Comparison of Labeled Trees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.05826 v2 pith:QTV2TIZE submitted 2023-01-14 q-bio.PE

classification q-bio.PE
keywords treeslabeledrobinson-fouldsdifferentdissimilaritydistancek-robinson-fouldscomparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Understanding the mutational history of tumor cells is a critical endeavor in unraveling the mechanisms underlying cancer. Since the modeling of tumor cell evolution employs labeled trees, researchers are motivated to develop different methods to assess and compare mutation trees and other labeled trees. While the Robinson-Foulds distance is a widely utilized metric for comparing phylogenetic trees, its applicability to labeled trees reveals certain limitations. This paper introduces the $k$-Robinson-Foulds dissimilarity measures, tailored to address the challenges of labeled tree comparison. The Robinson-Foulds distance is succinctly expressed as n-RF in the space of labeled trees with n nodes. Like the Robinson-Foulds distance, the k-Robinson-Foulds is a pseudometric for multiset-labeled trees and becomes a metric in the space of 1-labeled trees. By setting k to a small value, the k-Robinson-Foulds dissimilarity can capture analogous local regions in two labeled trees with different size or different labels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools