REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal analysis of finite element methods for the stochastic Stokes equations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Numerical analysis for the stochastic Stokes equations is still challenging even though it has been well done for the corresponding deterministic equations. In particular, the pre-existing error estimates of finite element methods for the stochastic Stokes equations { in the $L^\infty(0, T; L^2(\Omega; L^2))$ norm} all suffer from the order reduction with respect to the spatial discretizations. The best convergence result obtained for these fully discrete schemes is only half-order in time and first-order in space, which is not optimal in space in the traditional sense. The objective of this article is to establish strong convergence of $O(\tau^{1/2}+ h^2)$ in the $L^\infty(0, T; L^2(\Omega; L^2))$ norm for approximating the velocity, and strong convergence of $O(\tau^{1/2}+ h)$ in the $L^{\infty}(0, T;L^2(\Omega;L^2))$ norm for approximating the time integral of pressure, where $\tau$ and $h$ denote the temporal step size and spatial mesh size, respectively. The error estimates are of optimal order for the spatial discretization considered in this article (with MINI element), and consistent with the numerical experiments. The analysis is based on the fully discrete Stokes semigroup technique and the corresponding new estimates.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Pathwise uniform convergence of numerical approximations for a two-dimensional stochastic Navier-Stokes equation with no-slip boundary conditions
A fully discrete finite element and Euler scheme for the 2D no-slip stochastic Navier-Stokes equations converges pathwise in probability at nearly 1.5 spatial and 0.5 temporal order.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.