Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of Geometrical Layouts for Next-Generation Large-volume Cherenkov Neutrino Telescopes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.19010 v2 pith:QURHGWYT submitted 2024-07-26 physics.ins-det hep-ex

classification physics.ins-dethep-ex
keywords telescopesneutrinogeometricallayoutsnext-generationcherenkovdiscoveryefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Water-(Ice-) Cherenkov neutrino telescopes have played a pivotal role in the search and discovery of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. Experimental collaborations are developing and constructing next-generation neutrino telescopes with improved optical modules (OMs) and larger geometrical volumes to increase their efficiency in the multi-TeV energy range and extend their reach to EeV energies. Although most existing telescopes share similar OM layouts, more layout options should be explored for next-generation detectors to maximize discovery capability. In this work, we study a set of layouts at different geometrical volumes and evaluate the signal event selection efficiency and reconstruction fidelity under both an only trigger-level linear regression algorithm and an offline Graph Neural Network (GNN) reconstruction. Our methodology and findings serve as first steps toward an optimized, global network of neutrino telescopes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools