pith. sign in

arxiv: 1001.4795 · v1 · pith:QV4JRSEFnew · submitted 2010-01-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Through the Looking Glass: Why the "Cosmic Horizon" is not a horizon

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords horizonsomealternatecosmiccosmologylambdamodelsacceleration
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:QV4JRSEF Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{QV4JRSEF}

Prints a linked pith:QV4JRSEF badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The present standard model of cosmology, $\Lambda$CDM, contains some intriguing coincidences. Not only are the dominant contributions to the energy density approximately of the same order at the present epoch, but we note that contrary to the emergence of cosmic acceleration as a recent phenomenon, the time averaged value of the deceleration parameter over the age of the universe is nearly zero. Curious features like these in $\Lambda$CDM give rise to a number of alternate cosmologies being proposed to remove them, including models with an equation of state w = -1/3. In this paper, we examine the validity of some of these alternate models and we also address some persistent misconceptions about the Hubble sphere and the event horizon that lead to erroneous conclusions about cosmology.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.