Quantitative particle approximation of nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equations with singular kernel

Alexandre B. de Souza; Christian Olivera; Josu\'e Knorst

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Quantitative particle approximation of nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equations with singular kernel

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes an explicit $N^{-\kappa}$ convergence rate for the mollified empirical measure of a moderately interacting particle system with common noise and singular kernels to the solution of a nonlinear stochastic…

desk verdict Solid extension of the moderate-interaction program to common noise; the main theorem is likely right but the Itô formula gap at (16) needs a proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05950 v2 pith:QV56QO6I submitted 2024-12-08 math.PR math.AP

Josué Knorst , Christian Olivera , Alexandre B. de Souza This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.AP MSC 49N9060H3060K35

keywords stochasticFokker-Planckequationmean-fieldlimitcommonnoisesingularkernelmoderateinteractionempiricalmeasurepropagationofchaosKeller-Segel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives quantitative large-population limits for $N$ interacting diffusions on the torus, each driven by an independent Brownian motion and by one common environmental Brownian motion, with a singular interaction kernel. The main result, Theorem 2, states that the mollified empirical measure of the particle system converges in $L^m$ over the probability space, uniformly in time and in $L^q$ in space, to the unique solution of a nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equation, with an explicit error of order $N^{-\kappa}$, where $\kappa=\min(\beta\gamma/d,\frac12-\beta(1+1/d-1/q))$. If the paper is right, the mean-field limit is quantitative for rough kernels and common noise, covering the vorticity formulation of the 2D Navier-Stokes equation, the stochastic Burgers equation, and the parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model. The paper also proves that the limiting SPDE has a unique strong solution on a short time interval.

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by the Itô formula for the $L^q$ norm of an $H^1_q$-valued process taken from [35], applied to the difference $\rho-\rho^N$. That formula produces the dissipative term $-\frac12 q(q-1)\int|\rho-\rho^N|^{q-2}|\nabla(\rho-\rho^N)|^2$, which absorbs the Lipschitz drift error, while the common-noise terms cancel because $\sigma$ is spatially constant. The drift error is reduced by a commutator estimate bounding $\langle S_s^N, V^N(x-\cdot)(F(x,K*\rho_s^N)-F(\cdot,K*\rho_s^N))\rangle$ by $L(N^{-\beta/d}+\|\rho_s^N\|_q N^{-\beta\gamma/d})|\rho_s^N(x)|$, using the Holder regularity of $K*\rho^N$ and the support of $V$. The idiosyncratic noise contributes a martingale $M_t^N$ and a quadratic-variation term, both controlled by Burkholder-Davis-Gundy and the scaling identity $\int|\nabla V^N|^q\,dx=N^{q\beta(1+1/d)-\beta}\|\nabla V\|_q^q$; these two sources produce the two exponents inside $\kappa$. A uniformity lemma bounds $\sup_N\|\rho^N\|_{T,q}$ in $L^m(\Omega)$ and closes the Gronwall argument.

What would settle it

Derive the Itô differential of $\|\rho_t-\rho_t^N\|_q^q$ directly from equation (13) and compare it with inequality (16); if any cross-variation term between the common and idiosyncratic Brownian motions appears, the displayed martingale $M_t^N$ is incomplete and the rate is not established. Alternatively, in the one-dimensional Burgers setting of Theorem 3, simulate the particle system and the SPDE solution for increasing $N$ and check that the empirical $L^2$ error decays with exponent at least $\min(\beta/2,\frac12-\frac32\beta)$; a slower measured exponent would falsify the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central object is the mollified empirical measure $\rho_t^N=V^N*S_t^N$, where $S_t^N$ is the empirical measure of the particles and $V^N(x)=N^\beta V(N^{\beta/d}x)$ with $\beta\in(0,1)$ is the moderate-interaction mollifier. Theorem 2 asserts that, when the idiosyncratic diffusion coefficient is the identity and the common noise coefficient is spatially constant, the difference between the SPDE solution $\rho$ and $\rho^N$ satisfies $$\big\|\|\rho-\rho^N\|_{T,q}\big\|_{L^m(\$\Omega$)}\le C\big\|\|\rho_0-\rho_0^N\|_q\big\|_{L^m(\$\Omega$)}+$CN^{{-\kappa}}$,$$ with $\kappa=\min(\beta\gamma/d,\frac12-\beta(1+1/d-1/q))$, for every $m\ge1$. Here $\gamma$ is the Holder exponent supplied by the kernel assumption $\|K*f\|_{C^\gamma}\le C_K\|f\|_q$, and the parameter restrictions make both exponents positive. A one-dimensional Burgers case with $K=\delta_0$ is treated separately in Theorem 3 with rate $\min(\beta/2,\frac12-\frac32\beta)$. The same theorem, combined with a Kantorovich-Rubinstein estimate, gives propagation of chaos for the genuine empirical measure, and a cut-off argument extends the rate to particle systems without a truncated drift.

Load-bearing premise

The proof applies the Itô formula of [35] to the difference $\rho_t-\rho_t^N$, treating the mollified empirical process as if it satisfied the same SPDE hypotheses as $\rho$; the paper does not verify this, and the extra idiosyncratic-martingale terms in equation (13) are exactly where the framework could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Theorem 2 turns the mean-field limit into an explicit algebraic rate for the mollified empirical measure in $L^m(\Omega)$, uniformly in time, for singular kernels and common noise.
Corollary 1 transfers the rate to the un-mollified empirical measure in the Kantorovich-Rubinstein metric, which is a quantitative propagation of chaos for the marginals of the particle system.
The same estimates apply to the stochastic 2D Navier-Stokes vorticity equation, the stochastic Burgers equation, and the parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model in any dimension.
Corollary 2 shows the bounded-drift truncation can be removed: for the uncut particle system the same rate holds up to a probability bound, with the cut-off level chosen from $\|K*\rho\|_{\infty}$.
Theorem 1 supplies well-posedness of the limiting SPDE, so the particle approximation is approximating a well-defined unique strong solution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The two terms in $\kappa$ have distinct origins: $N^{-\beta\gamma/d}$ is the cost of mollifying the empirical measure, while $N^{-(\frac12-\beta(1+1/d-1/q))}$ is the fluctuation cost of the idiosyncratic noise; equating them would select an optimal moderate-interaction exponent $\beta$ for a given kernel, a choice the paper does not discuss.
The boundedness of $F$ in (AF) is likely removable: Corollary 2 shows the truncation level is controlled by $\|K*\rho\|_{\infty}$, so in models with a maximum principle, such as Burgers, the cut-off can be chosen deterministically and the rate should hold for the untruncated system.
Since the common Brownian motion drives both the particle system and the SPDE, environmental noise cancels from the leading error; this suggests the rate is driven by the idiosyncratic fluctuations, and one could look for conditional-on-common-noise or uniform-in-time versions under stronger regularity.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

This paper extends quantitative moderately interacting particle approximation to SPDEs with common noise and singular kernels, covering Navier–Stokes, Burgers, and Keller–Segel. That combination is genuinely new: prior work by Olivera–Richard–Tomašević only had idiosyncratic noise, and common-noise results for singular kernels were limited. The well-posedness theorem for the SPDE with the nonlinear term K*ρ is also new and reasonably clean.

The proof follows the established semigroup/Krylov route: Itô formula for L^q norms of H^1_q processes, commutator estimates, and uniform bounds on the mollified empirical measure. The estimates are explicit and the rate is N^{-κ} with κ = min(βγ/d, 1/2 − β(1+1/d−1/q)). I believe the main theorem is likely correct, but the proof has a real gap that needs fixing before publication.

The gap is at the start of Section 2.1. Equation (16) applies an Itô formula to δ = ρ − ρ^N and writes down a formula that includes the idiosyncratic martingale term M^N_t and its quadratic variation. That is the right formula—the stress-test worry that those terms are missing is wrong, they are there. The actual problem is that δ does not satisfy the SPDE framework of Krylov [35] used for the citation: the drift and common-noise diffusion are functions of δ, but the W^i-term is an L^q-valued stochastic integral whose integrand depends on the particle positions X^i, not on δ. So [35, Theorems 4.2/5.1] does not directly apply, and the paper gives no alternative justification, e.g. a mollification/approximation argument. Since (16) underpins every later estimate, a referee should ask for this to be closed.

Two smaller things. The bound for M^N_t with δ in Theorem 2 is only sketched as “similar computations” to Lemma 6; it should be written out because the integrand differs (δ instead of ρ^N). And Corollary 1 states a rate N^{-κ+ε} but the proof appears to give N^{-κ} directly (since κ ≤ β/d, the N^{-β/d} from (5) is dominated); the ε is unexplained and probably unnecessary. Also, the Keller–Segel kernel bound is cited to an unpublished preprint [44]; the authors should verify it or include a proof.

These are addressable. The structure is sound, the constants are generic, and the paper is honest about what is borrowed. I would send it to a knowledgeable referee.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies an N-particle system on the torus with moderately interacting singular kernels, idiosyncratic noise, and common noise. Its main result (Theorem 2) is a quantitative estimate in L^m(Omega) for the distance between the mollified empirical measure rho^N and the solution rho of a nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equation with transport noise, of the form ||rho - rho^N||_{T,q} <= C ||rho_0 - rho_0^N||_q + C N^{-kappa}, with kappa = min(beta gamma/d, 1/2 - beta(1 + 1/d - 1/q)), under assumptions (AV), (Ac), (AF), (AK), with nu = Id and sigma spatially independent. Theorem 3 gives a one-dimensional Burgers-type variant with K = delta_0, and Corollaries 1 and 2 translate the result to the empirical measure and to cutoff approximations. The paper also proves local well-posedness of the limiting SPDE (Theorem 1) by a fixed-point argument in Krylov's L^q theory, and discusses applications to stochastic Navier-Stokes, Keller-Segel, and Burgers equations.

Significance. If correct, the paper is a valuable quantitative mean-field limit for singular kernels in the presence of common noise, with explicit polynomial rates and no fitted parameters. The common-noise setting is genuinely different from the earlier moderately interacting results on which the method builds, and the well-posedness theorem is a useful complement. The applications to Navier-Stokes, Keller-Segel, and Burgers equations are credible and give the results broader interest. The main caveat is that the central Itô formula application to the difference process is not verified in the manuscript; the significance is conditional on that step being supplied.

major comments (2)

[Section 2.1, Eq. (16)] The proof of Theorem 2 invokes the Itô formula for the L^q norm of an H^1_q-valued process from [35] and applies it to delta = rho - rho^N, but the hypotheses of [35, Theorems 4.2 and 5.1] are not verified for delta. The equation for delta contains, in addition to the common-noise term -sigma^T nabla delta dB, the idiosyncratic martingale term (1/N) sum_i nabla V^N(· - X^i_s) dW^i_s, which depends on the particle positions and is not of the form sigma(x) nabla delta. If this term is intended to be treated as a free term g^k in Krylov's framework, the paper should state the corresponding version of the Itô formula and check the required predictability, integrability, and H^1_q regularity; otherwise Eq. (16) is not justified. Because Eq. (16) is the starting point for the dissipation estimate, the bounds on I1 and I2, and the estimate of M^N, this verification is load-bearing for the claimed N^{-kappa} rate. The same comment applies to Eq. (20) in Lemma 4, where the formula is applied to rho^N itself; for the smooth rho^N this can be justified by pointwise Itô calculus, but the manuscript should say so explicitly.
[Section 1.4, Theorem 3] Theorem 3 assumes K = delta_0 without (AK), so Theorem 1 does not provide the solution rho or the a.s. bounds used in the proof of Theorem 3. The proof implicitly relies on the Burgers equation well-posedness and maximum principle from [1], which is mentioned only in Section 1.5. The theorem statement should either include the external well-posedness/maximum-principle hypotheses explicitly or the paper should prove the needed regularity of rho, because the proof of Theorem 3 uses the existence of rho with sup_t ||rho_t||_2 and ||rho||_{L^2 H^1_2} bounded.

minor comments (5)

[Display before Eq. (17)] The term C(N^{-beta gamma/d})^m E(||rho^N||_{T,q} ||rho^N||_{T,q})^m is malformed; if it is meant to be E||rho^N||_{T,q}^{2m}, it should be written that way, since this is the moment that requires the uniform bound from Lemma 4 for exponent 2m.
[Corollary 1] The parameter epsilon in the exponent N^{-kappa + epsilon} is unexplained and appears unnecessary: Theorem 2 or 3 gives N^{-kappa}, and the deterministic regularization error N^{-beta/d} is no larger than N^{-kappa} because kappa <= beta gamma/d <= beta/d. Either remove epsilon or justify why a slightly worse rate is needed.
[Eq. (16) and definition of M^N_t] The sign of the idiosyncratic stochastic integral in the displayed Itô formula is inconsistent with the definition of M^N_t: the formula writes -M^N_t, while M^N_t is defined as the positive stochastic integral. Since only |M^N_t| is used later, this sign inconsistency does not affect the estimates, but it should be corrected.
[Corollary 2] In the statement of Corollary 2, the initial-error term should be ||~rho^N_0 - rho_0||_q (or ||~rho^N_0 - rho_0||_{0,q}), not ||~rho^N_0 - rho_0||_{T,q}, since no time interval is involved in the initial norm.
[Appendix A, Lemma 6] The Young/Jensen step in the proof of Lemma 6 is abbreviated; in particular, the exponents for q > 2 and the separate q = 2 case should be spelled out, because the displayed estimates require the reader to reconstruct the cancellation of the factor 1/N.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the quantitative convergence rate in Theorem 2 is derived from an explicit Itô-formula estimate together with Burkholder–Davis–Gundy and Grönwall inequalities; the self-citations serve as technical background rather than as the source of the common-noise convergence claim.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 2) is a quantitative L^m(Ω) bound on ||ρ−ρ^N||_{T,q} in terms of the initial mollification error ||ρ0−ρ0^N||_q plus N^{−κ}. Nothing is fitted: the rate κ emerges from explicit exponent bookkeeping in equations (16)–(17), the estimates for I1 and I2, Lemma 4, and Lemma 6. The proof does not define the target quantity in terms of the assumption, and the initial-error term is a standard component of a Grönwall estimate rather than a hidden restatement of the conclusion. The paper does cite the authors' earlier works [43], [44], and [34] for technique, and [44] supplies the Keller–Segel kernel estimate used to verify assumption (AK) in an application; however, these are auxiliary estimates or reproduced arguments, and the specific common-noise/singular-kernel convergence result of Theorem 2 is not imported from them. The main mathematical risk identified by the reader—whether Krylov's H^1_q Itô formula from [35] applies to the difference ρ−ρ^N given its idiosyncratic martingale terms—is a hypothesis-verification and correctness question, not a circularity: it does not make equation (16) equal to an input by construction. Therefore, applying the quoted-reduction test, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no parameters. Its central claim rests on (i) standard stochastic analysis tools (Krylov's Lq theory, Itô formula for H^1_q-valued processes, Burkholder-Davis-Gundy, Gronwall, Sobolev embeddings) and (ii) domain assumptions on the mollifier V, the drift F, the kernel K, and the diffusion coefficients. The only non-standard dependency is the (AK) estimate for the Keller-Segel kernel, cited to the unpublished preprint [44] by the same group. The parameter β is a model parameter of the moderate interaction, not a fitted constant.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Mollifier V ∈ C^2(R^d) ∩ P(R^d), supp V ⊂ {x: |x| < 1/2} (Assumption (AV))
Defines the moderate interaction kernel V^N = N^β V(N^{β/d}·) and underlies the estimates in (22) and (5).
domain assumption Drift F bounded and Lipschitz, or F(x,u) = u (Assumptions (AF)/(AI))
Controls the nonlinear drift in the SPDE and the particle system; (AF) is used in Theorems 1-3, (AI) in an alternative regime of Theorem 1.
domain assumption Kernel K satisfies ||K*f||_γ ≤ C_K||f||_q for q > d, γ ∈ (0,1] (Assumption (AK))
Provides the Hölder regularization of the interaction kernel; for the Keller-Segel application it is verified by Lemma 41 of the unpublished preprint [44].
domain assumption Diffusion coefficients ν, σ are C^2, σ divergence-free, and the νν^T part is elliptic (Assumption (Ac))
Needed for Krylov's Lq theory and the Itô formula; the ellipticity (Ac_iii) controls the dissipation.
standard math Krylov's Lq theory of SPDEs, Theorem 5.1 in [35], with the associated Itô formula for the Lq norm of H^1_q-valued processes
The core tool for the well-posedness proof of Appendix B and for the error estimates in Section 2.1; assumed without restating the hypotheses.
domain assumption Existence of unique strong solutions for the particle SDEs (2), (9), (10)
Standard for SDEs with bounded smooth drifts; the paper states it in Section 1.5.
standard math Maximum principle for the Burgers equation (Lemma 4.10 in [1])
Used in Section 1.5 to justify the cutoff argument for the Burgers application; external published result.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantitative particle approximation of nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equations with singular kernel." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QV56QO6I

@misc{pith2026241205950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantitative particle approximation of nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equations with singular kernel},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QV56QO6I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05950}
}

abstract

We derive quantitative estimates for large stochastic systems of interacting particles perturbed by both idiosyncratic and environmental noises, as well as singular kernels. We prove that the (mollified) empirical process converges to the solution of the nonlinear stochastic Fokker-Planck equation. The proof is based on It\^o's formula for $H_{q}^{1}$-valued process, commutator estimates, and some estimations for the regularization of the empirical measure. Moreover, we show that the aforementioned equation admits a unique strong solution in the probabilistic sense. The approach applies to repulsive and attractive kernels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

[35]

N. V. Krylov, An analytic approach to SPDEs. In Stochastic partial dif- ferential equations: six perspectives , Math. Surveys Monogr., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999. 36

work page 1999
[44]

Olivera, A

C. Olivera, A. Richard and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c, Quantitative approximation of the Burgers and Keller-Segel equations by moderately inter acting particles, Preprint arXiv:2004.03177, 2023

arXiv 2004
[1]

Alonso-Oran, D., A

D. Alonso-Oran, D., A. Bethencourt de Le´ on and S. Takao, The Burg- ers’ equation with stochastic transport: shock formation, local and global existence of smooth solutions , Nonlinear Diﬀer. Equ. Appl. 26, 2019

work page 2019
[2]

V. I. Bogachev, Measure Theory, Vol. II , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007

2007
[3]

Bresch, P.-E

D. Bresch, P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. Mean-ﬁeld limit and quantitative es- timates with singular attractive kernels , Duke Mathematical Journal, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Brzezniak and G

Z. Brzezniak and G. Dhariwal, Stochastic constrained Navier–Stokes equa- tions on T 2 Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Diﬀerenti al Equations, Springer, 2011

H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Diﬀerenti al Equations, Springer, 2011

work page 2011
[6]

Carmona and F

R. Carmona and F. Delarue, Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications. I:, Mean Field FBSDEs, Control, and Game s. vol. 84 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling, Springer, Cham, 2018. [7] , Probabilistic theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II: Mean Field Games with Common Noise and Master Equations , vol. 84 of Prob- abil...

work page 2018

Show all 52 references

[8]

J. A. Carrillo, F. Xuanrui Feng, S. Guo, P. E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. Rela- tive entropy method for particle approximation of the Landa u equation for Maxwellian molecules , Preprint arXiv:2408.15035, 2024

2024 arXiv
[9]

Cattiaux, Entropy on the Path Space and Application to Singular Diﬀu- sions and Mean-ﬁeld Models , Preprint arXiv:2404.09552, 2024

P. Cattiaux, Entropy on the Path Space and Application to Singular Diﬀu- sions and Mean-ﬁeld Models , Preprint arXiv:2404.09552, 2024

2024 arXiv
[10]

L. Chen, E. S. Daus, A. Holzinger A. J¨ ungel, Rigorous Derivation of Pop- ulation Cross-Diﬀusion Systems from Moderately Interacti ng Particle Sys- tems, Journal of Nonlinear Science, 31, 2021

2021
[11]

L. Chen, A. Holzinger and X. Huo, Quantitative convergence in rela- tive entropy for a moderately interacting particle system o n Rd , Preprint arXiv:2311.01980, 2023

2023 arXiv
[12]

L. Chen, A. Holzinger, A. Jungel, N. Zamponi, Analysis and mean-ﬁeld derivation of a porous-medium equation with fractional diﬀ usion, Commu- nications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 47, 2022

2022
[13]

L. Chen, P. Nikolaev and D.J. Promel, Hegselmann-Krause model with environmental noise , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/9289, 2024

2024 doi
[14]

Coghi and F

M. Coghi and F. Flandoli, Propagation of chaos for interacting particles subject to environmental noise , Ann. Appl. Probab. 26, 2016

2016
[15]

Correa and C

J. Correa and C. Olivera, From Stochastic Hamiltonian Systems to Stochas- tic Compressible Euler Equation , Preprint arXiv:2301.08101, 2023

2023 arXiv
[16]

Cortez and J

R. Cortez and J. Fontbona. Quantitative uniform propagation of chaos for Maxwell molecules . Comm. Math. Phys., 357, 2018

2018
[17]

Flandoli, Random perturbation of PDEs and ﬂuid dynamic models

F. Flandoli, Random perturbation of PDEs and ﬂuid dynamic models. Lec- tures from the 40th Probability Summer School held in Saint-Flour, 2 010. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 2015. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

2015
[18]

Flandoli, M

F. Flandoli, M. Ghio and G. Livieri, N-player games and mean ﬁeld games of moderate interactions , Appl. Math. Optim., 85, 2022

2022
[19]

Flandoli, M

F. Flandoli, M. Leimbach and C. Olivera, Uniform convergence of prolifer- ating particles to the FKPP equation , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 473, 2019

2019
[20]

Flandoli and M

F. Flandoli and M. Leocata, A particle system approach to aggregation phenomena, J. Appl. Probab., 56, 2019

2019
[21]

Flandoli and M

F. Flandoli and M. Leocata, The Navier-Stokes-Vlasov-Fokker-Planck sys- tem as a scaling limit of particles in a ﬂuid , J. Math. Fluid Mech., 23, 2021. 35

2021
[22]

Flandoli and E

F. Flandoli and E. Luongo, Stochastic Navier–Stokes Equations and State- Dependent Noise. In: Stochastic Partial Diﬀerential Equat ions in Fluid Mechanics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, 2330, 2023

2023
[23]

Flandoli, C

F. Flandoli, C. Olivera and M. Simon, Uniform approximation of 2 di- mensional Navier-Stokes equation by stochastic interacti ng particle systems, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 52, 2020

2020
[24]

Fournier, M

N. Fournier, M. Hauray and S. Mischler. Propagation of chaos for the 2D viscous vortex model . J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 16(7):1423–1466, 2014

2014
[25]

Fournier and B

N. Fournier and B. Jourdain. Stochastic particle approximation of the Keller–Segel equation and two-dimensional generalizatio n of Bessel pro- cesses, Ann. Appl. Probab. , 27, 2017

2017
[26]

Fournier, Y

N. Fournier, Y. Tardy, Collisions of the supercritical Keller–Segel particle system, Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2024

2024
[27]

Guillin, P

A. Guillin, P. Le Bris and P. Monmarche, Uniform in time propagation of chaos for the 2D vortex model and other singular stochasti c systems , J. Eur. Math. Soc, 2024

2024
[28]

Guo and D

S. Guo and D. Luo, Scaling limit of moderately interacting particle systems with singular interaction and environmental noise , The Annals of Applied Probability, 33, 2023

2023
[29]

Hao, J.F

Z. Hao, J.F. Jabir, S. Menozzi and M. Rockner, Propagation of chaos for moderately interacting particle systems related to singul ar kinetic Mckean- Vlasov SDEs , Preprint arXiv:2405.09195, 2024

2024
[30]

Holm, Variational principles for stochastic ﬂuid dynamics , Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences, 471, 2016

D.D. Holm, Variational principles for stochastic ﬂuid dynamics , Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences, 471, 2016

2016
[31]

Huang and J

H. Huang and J. Qiu, The microscopic derivation and well- posedness of the stochastic Keller-Segel equation , J. Nonlin. Sci., 31, 2021

2021
[32]

Jabin and Z

P.-E. Jabin and Z. Wang. Quantitative estimates of propagation of chaos for stochastic systems with W −1,∞ kernels. Invent. Math., 214, 2018

2018
[33]

Jourdain and S

B. Jourdain and S. M´ el´ eard, Propagation of chaos and ﬂuctuations for a moderate model with smooth initial data , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 34, 1998

1998
[34]

Knorst, C

J. Knorst, C. Olivera and A. B. de Souza, Convergence Rate for Moder- ate Interaction particles and Application to Mean Field Gam es, Preprint arXiv:2402.13167, 2024

2024 arXiv
[36]

Lacker and L

D. Lacker and L. Le Flem, n-Closed-loop convergence for mean ﬁeld games with common noise , The Annals of Applied Probability, 2023

2023
[37]

Majda, I

A.J. Majda, I. Timofeyev and E. Vanden-Eijnden, A mathematical frame- work for stochastic climate models , Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 54, 2001

2001
[38]

M´ el´ eard and S

S. M´ el´ eard and S. Roelly-Coppoletta,A propagation of chaos result for a system of particles with moderate interaction , Stochastic Process. Appl., 26, 1987

1987
[39]

Nguyen, M

Q.H. Nguyen, M. Rosenzweig, S. Serfaty, Mean-ﬁeld limits of Riesz-type singular ﬂows , Ars Inveniendi Analytica, July 2022

2022
[40]

Oelschl¨ ager, A martingale approach to the law of large numbers for weakly interacting stochastic processes , Ann

K. Oelschl¨ ager, A martingale approach to the law of large numbers for weakly interacting stochastic processes , Ann. Probab., 12, 1984

1984
[41]

Oelschl¨ ager,A law of large numbers for moderately interacting diﬀusion processes, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebi- ete, 69, 1985

K. Oelschl¨ ager,A law of large numbers for moderately interacting diﬀusion processes, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebi- ete, 69, 1985

1985
[42]

Oelschl¨ ager,A ﬂuctuation theorem for moderately interacting diﬀusion processes, Probab

K. Oelschl¨ ager,A ﬂuctuation theorem for moderately interacting diﬀusion processes, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 74, 1987

1987
[43]

Olivera, A

C. Olivera, A. Richard and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c, Quantitative particle approxi- mation of nonlinear Fokker-Planck equations with singular kernel, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci., 5, 2021

2021
[45]

Olivera and M

C. Olivera and M. Simon, Microscopic derivation of non-local mod- els with anomalous diﬀusions from stochastic particle syst ems, Preprint arXiv:2404.03772, to appears Nonlinear Analysis, 2024

2024 arXiv
[46]

Nikolaev, Quantitative relative entropy estimates for interacting p article systems with common noise , Preprint arXiv:2407.01217, 2024

P. Nikolaev, Quantitative relative entropy estimates for interacting p article systems with common noise , Preprint arXiv:2407.01217, 2024

2024 arXiv
[47]

Serfaty, Mean ﬁeld limit for Coulomb-type ﬂows

S. Serfaty, Mean ﬁeld limit for Coulomb-type ﬂows . Duke Math. J., 169, 2020

2020
[48]

Schmeisser and H

H.-J. Schmeisser and H. Triebel, Topics in Fourier analysis and function spaces, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chich- ester, 1987

1987
[49]

Shao and X

Y. Shao and X. Zhao, Quantitative particle approximations of stochastic 2d navier-stokes equation , Preprint arXiv:2402.02336, 2024

2024 arXiv
[50]

Simon and C

M. Simon and C. Olivera, Non-local conservation law from stochastic par- ticle systems , J. Dynam. Diﬀerential Equations, 30, 2018. 37

2018
[51]

Stevens, The derivation of chemotaxis equations as limit dynamics of moderately interacting stochastic many-particle systems , SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 61, 2000

A. Stevens, The derivation of chemotaxis equations as limit dynamics of moderately interacting stochastic many-particle systems , SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 61, 2000

2000
[52]

Tomasevic, D Talay, A new McKean-Vlasov stochastic interpretation of the parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel model: The one-di mensional case , Bernoulli 26, 2020

M. Tomasevic, D Talay, A new McKean-Vlasov stochastic interpretation of the parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel model: The one-di mensional case , Bernoulli 26, 2020

2020
[53]

Triebel, Interpolation theory, function spaces, diﬀerential opera tors, Jo- hann Ambrosius Barth, Heidelberg, second ed., 1995

H. Triebel, Interpolation theory, function spaces, diﬀerential opera tors, Jo- hann Ambrosius Barth, Heidelberg, second ed., 1995. 38

1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [35]

N. V. Krylov, An analytic approach to SPDEs. In Stochastic partial dif- ferential equations: six perspectives , Math. Surveys Monogr., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999. 36

work page 1999

[2] [44]

Olivera, A

C. Olivera, A. Richard and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c, Quantitative approximation of the Burgers and Keller-Segel equations by moderately inter acting particles, Preprint arXiv:2004.03177, 2023

arXiv 2004

[3] [1]

Alonso-Oran, D., A

D. Alonso-Oran, D., A. Bethencourt de Le´ on and S. Takao, The Burg- ers’ equation with stochastic transport: shock formation, local and global existence of smooth solutions , Nonlinear Diﬀer. Equ. Appl. 26, 2019

work page 2019

[4] [2]

V. I. Bogachev, Measure Theory, Vol. II , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007

2007

[5] [3]

Bresch, P.-E

D. Bresch, P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. Mean-ﬁeld limit and quantitative es- timates with singular attractive kernels , Duke Mathematical Journal, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [4]

Brzezniak and G

Z. Brzezniak and G. Dhariwal, Stochastic constrained Navier–Stokes equa- tions on T 2 Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 2021

work page 2021

[7] [5]

Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Diﬀerenti al Equations, Springer, 2011

H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Diﬀerenti al Equations, Springer, 2011

work page 2011

[8] [6]

Carmona and F

R. Carmona and F. Delarue, Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications. I:, Mean Field FBSDEs, Control, and Game s. vol. 84 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling, Springer, Cham, 2018. [7] , Probabilistic theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II: Mean Field Games with Common Noise and Master Equations , vol. 84 of Prob- abil...

work page 2018