Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 88 references

Exploring Self-Organization of Charged Dust Dimers in Plasma

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that dumbbell dust grains form ring and shell structures whose axis flips between tangential and radial as clusters grow, while bulk assemblies stay hexagonally ordered but orientationally isotropic.

desk verdict The confined-cluster orientational transitions are the solid core; the bulk isotropy claim needs stronger equilibration evidence before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19180 v2 pith:QW7ZDREX submitted 2026-07-21 physics.plasm-ph

Aman Singh Katariya , Amita Das , Mamta Yadav , Bibhuti Bhusan Sahu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.27.Lw52.27.Gr52.65.Yy
keywords dustyplasmachargeddustdimersorientationalorderself-organizationYukawapotentialmoleculardynamicstwo-dimensionalclusterscomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that swapping spherical dust grains for dumbbell-shaped dimers adds a rotational degree of freedom to plasma-crystal self-organization, so equilibrium order is decided both by where particles sit and by how they point. In radially confined clusters of two to twenty-five dimers, molecular dynamics simulations show shell and ring structures forming as particle number grows, with the dimer axis first tangential, then radial at five dimers, then tangential again at six; later shell transitions such as 16 to 17 come with a collective reorientation. In bulk simulations under periodic boundaries, dimers form a hexagonal lattice but lose long-range orientational order, staying positionally crystalline and orientationally isotropic, and the hex-to-square transition seen for monomers is suppressed. The result is worth caring about because shaped dust grains are seen in real plasma experiments, so orientational ordering may give dusty plasma a liquid-crystal-like handle for watching anisotropic self-organization particle by particle.

What carries the argument

The central object is a rigid dumbbell dimer: two point charges fixed at a separation comparable to the Debye length, interacting through isotropic screened-Coulomb (Yukawa) pair potentials, with the two bells of the same dimer exempt from mutual repulsion. The confinement is a radial electric field, and ordering is diagnosed with an orientational order parameter S = <2cos^2(theta)-1>, where theta is the angle between the dimer axis and the radial field; for periodic systems a nematic order tensor plays that role. The work of the dumbbell is to convert force imbalances between its two ends into torques, which is what produces persistent rotation and makes orientational transitions detectable

What would settle it

Look at a five-dimer cluster in a 2D plasma trap: the paper predicts the dimer axes point radially outward, whereas four dimers should be tangential. A second check runs a periodic dimer simulation that includes a directional plasma flow or orientation-dependent grain charging; if the dimer lattice then undergoes the hex-to-square transition at high screening, the claimed robustness of the hexagonal phase is an artifact of the clean Yukawa model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that orientational order is a real, measurable coordinate of self-organization in strongly coupled dusty plasmas when particles are anisotropic. For finite clusters, the equilibrium is always dynamic: isolated dimers rotate freely; two to four dimers orbit on a ring locked tangential; five dimers switch to radial; six dimers rearrange into a (1,5) two-shell structure and revert to tangential; analogous orientation flips accompany later shell transitions. The orientation preference is traced to the potential-energy landscape, which tilts from tangential to radial as cluster geometry changes. In periodic systems, 1288 dimers settle into a hexagonal lattice with short-range

Load-bearing premise

The results rest on representing a real shaped dust grain as a rigid two-point-charge dumbbell interacting only through isotropic Yukawa forces, without orientation-dependent charging, ion-flow wake effects, or bond flexibility; if those missing effects are strong, the predicted orientation transitions and bulk orientational isotropy may not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Confined dimer clusters follow a reproducible orientational sequence: tangential for two to four dimers, radial at five, tangential again at six, with orientation flips tied to shell formation such as the 16-to-17 transition.
  • All confined dimer clusters remain dynamically active at equilibrium, showing collective rotation or oscillation, unlike static monomer clusters.
  • Global orientational order weakens as cluster size grows, but does not vanish: mixed states and intermittent radial-tangential switching persist at 23 dimers.
  • In periodic bulk, dimers keep hexagonal translational order across screening strengths, suppressing the hex-to-square transition monomers show, while global orientation remains isotropic.
  • The results make dusty plasma a candidate liquid-crystal-like platform where both translational and rotational order can be imaged particle by particle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rigid-dumbbell model carries over to real elongated grains, the predicted five-dimer radial flip is directly testable in a 2D plasma trap, and seeing it would confirm that the orientational order is not an artifact of the idealized bond.
  • The suppression of the hex-to-square transition hints at a general design rule: an internal rotational degree of freedom lets anisotropic particles absorb screening-induced stress without changing lattice symmetry, a behavior rodlike colloids and granular monolayers might share.
  • The persistent rotation of isolated and paired dimers implies that in any confining potential with orientational degeneracy, an anisotropic grain cannot fully freeze, which could be probed by measuring angular diffusion of single asymmetric dust grains.
  • The observed orientation switching in mixed clusters suggests competing near-degenerate minima; slow annealing or temperature cycling could reveal whether this switching is true metastability or simply thermal exploration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents two-dimensional molecular-dynamics simulations of charged rigid dimers ('dumbbells') interacting through Yukawa potentials in a strongly coupled dusty-plasma model. In the first part (Section III), N=2-25 dimers are confined by a radial electric field. The authors report shell structures (Tables I-II) and classify the global dimer orientation as tangential, radial, or mixed; in particular, N=5 is radial while N=4 is tangential, and this is supported by a potential-energy-vs-orientation calculation (Fig. 6). In the second part (Section IV), 1288 dimers are studied with periodic boundary conditions; the centers form a hexagonal lattice while the nematic order parameters Sx and Sglobal relax to zero, suggesting an orientationally isotropic bulk state. A scan of screening parameter kappa and coupling Gamma is also presented.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a useful first systematic look at orientational degrees of freedom in strongly coupled dusty plasmas beyond spheres. The N=4-to-N=5 tangential-to-radial switching and the coexistence of crystalline translational order with orientational isotropy are interesting and experimentally testable with shaped grains. The paper's strengths include direct MD simulation rather than fitted models, an energy-landscape explanation for the small-cluster transition, and scans over kappa and Gamma. However, the quantitative support is currently incomplete: key parameters (K, periodic box size/density) are missing, and the equilibrium claim rests on single trajectories without equilibration diagnostics. These issues are load-bearing and require additional simulations and reporting.

major comments (6)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (2)] The confining field strength K is never specified numerically or in normalized units. All confined-cluster results (Tables I-III, Figs. 2-8) depend on this parameter. Without K, the reported radial/tangential/mixed transitions are not reproducible and cannot be assessed for robustness. Please report K (ideally normalized by Q_d/a^2 or similar), the total simulation time/number of steps, thermostat settings, and the number of independent initial conditions for each N.
  2. [Section IV, first paragraph] The periodic simulation is described only as '1288 dimers in a two-dimensional periodic box.' The box dimensions and dimer number density are not stated in Section IV; Section II gives Lx=Ly=12.7943a for the confined geometry, but it is not clear that the periodic runs use the same box. Density controls the lattice and finite-size effects, so the hexagonal-order and isotropy conclusions are not reproducible without this information. Please specify Lx, Ly, density, and ideally a finite-size check (e.g., 512 vs 2048 dimers).
  3. [Section IV, Figs. 11 and 13] The bulk isotropy claim rests on Sx and Sglobal approaching zero in single trajectories. The paper itself notes in Section III that high-Gamma states can be trapped in metastable configurations for extended periods. No equilibration diagnostics are provided: no Sglobal-vs-time curves, autocorrelation times, block averages, multiple random initial conditions (beyond the single y-aligned start), or heating/cooling cycles. A monotonic decay of Sx is also consistent with relaxation toward a metastable isotropic state. Please add multiple seeds and quantitative equilibration checks for each Gamma.
  4. [Section II, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) writes F_l = -Q_d sum grad U, while U(r) is defined as (Q_d/4 pi epsilon_0 r) exp(-kappa r). Since U already contains Q_d, this double-counts the charge. If the implemented pair force is -grad U, the prefactor Q_d in Eq. (1) should be removed; if U is intended as a reduced potential normalized by Q_d, that should be stated. Please clarify the exact LAMMPS pair style and coefficient used, as this is the fundamental interaction of the model.
  5. [Section III, Fig. 6] The energy-landscape comparison is the main evidence for the N=4 tangential to N=5 radial transition, but the calculation is not described. It is unclear whether the cluster centers are held fixed at the equilibrium positions, whether all dimers are rotated by the same angle theta, and whether positions are re-minimized at each theta. In addition, the caption labels both panels '4 dimer cluster' while the text describes Fig. 6(b) as the five-dimer case. Please specify the protocol and correct the caption.
  6. [Section III, Table III] Table III, which is said to summarize configurations for Gamma = 200, 500, 1000, 2500, appears empty in the manuscript (the rows list only dimer numbers 6, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16 with no entries). The Gamma-dependence of the confined cluster structures cannot be evaluated from the main text without this table. Please provide the data or remove the table and describe the configurations explicitly in the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Tables I and II] The shell notation in the Structure column (e.g., (0,2), (5,11)) is not defined in the captions. Please state that the tuple lists the number of dimers in successive shells from the center outward.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (4)] The nematic tensor should be written component-wise, e.g., Q_alpha_beta = (1/N) sum_i (2 u_i_alpha u_i_beta - delta_alpha_beta); the current notation is ambiguous.
  3. [Figs. 7, 8, and 12] These figures report order-parameter values without error bars or run-to-run variability. If each point is from a single simulation, that should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Fig. 12] The axis label uses 'shielding parameter' while the text uses 'screening parameter'; please unify the terminology.
  5. [Section III, Fig. 2(b)] The statement that the angle 'frequently exceeds 360 degrees' should specify whether the plotted angle is unwrapped; otherwise the plot modulo 360 degrees cannot show this directly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the dimer ordering results are direct MD outputs; admitted metastability is an equilibration/sampling limitation, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The central structural and orientational claims are read directly from LAMMPS simulations of a stated Yukawa dumbbell model (Eqs. 1-2); there is no fitted parameter that is later renamed a prediction, and no target result is built into the definition of the order parameters (Eqs. 3-4). The 4- and 5-dimer potential-energy curves in Fig. 6 are independent Hamiltonian evaluations along a rotation coordinate, not fits to the observed radial/tangential assignments, so the explanation is post hoc but not circular. Self-citations [38,57-60] provide monomer baselines and prior cluster context, but the dimer-specific shell/orientation sequence and bulk isotropy are established by this paper's own simulations, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The paper itself flags that high-Γ runs may remain trapped in metastable states and that no guarantee of reaching the absolute minimum exists; this, plus the absence of equilibration diagnostics, is a correctness/evidence limitation on the claim that Sglobal→0 is the equilibrium state, not a circular step, because the conclusion is not defined in terms of, or fitted to, that limitation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on treating each dust dimer as two rigid point charges interacting via linear-superposed Yukawa potentials, with the plasma response reduced to a screening length and no wakefields or charge fluctuations; confinement is a fixed radial harmonic force with unspecified strength; and the periodic bulk is studied at a single unstated density. These are reasonable first steps but untested against experimental shaped-grain data.

free parameters (3)
  • confining field strength K = not specified
    Eq. (2) defines the radial trap via K, but its value never appears; all confined-cluster structures and their N-dependent transitions depend on the trap stiffness relative to inter-dimer repulsion.
  • dimer bond length l_d = 0.3 mm
    Chosen to be comparable to the Debye length and never varied; the ratio l_d/λ_D controls the strength of orientational torques and is a hand-set model parameter.
  • periodic box dimensions / dimer number density = unspecified
    The 1288-dimer periodic runs are mentioned without box size or density; the hexagonal lattice and orientational isotropy may depend on packing fraction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Yukawa pairwise superposition of charged-bell interactions models the plasma-mediated force in a strongly coupled dusty plasma.
    Section II; neglects ion wakes, plasma absorption, charge fluctuations, and many-body polarization.
  • domain assumption A rigid dumbbell with two point charges at fixed separation represents real elongated or dumbbell-shaped dust grains.
    Section II; motivated by experimental observations of C2, fullerene, and sputtering dimers, but not quantitatively validated.
  • domain assumption The radial confining electric field in Eq. (2) adequately represents experimental dust-particle traps.
    Section II; the field strength K is unspecified, and the results depend on the confinement strength.
  • domain assumption The Nose-Hoover and Langevin thermostats drive the system to the relevant equilibrium or metastable state.
    Sections II and IV; at very high Γ the paper itself notes that metastable states may persist.
  • domain assumption The scalar order parameter S and the nematic tensor Q capture the orientational order relevant to the physics.
    Eqs. (3)-(4); no other broken symmetries or higher-order orientational correlations are examined.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Self-Organization of Charged Dust Dimers in Plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QW7ZDREX

@misc{pith2026260719180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Self-Organization of Charged Dust Dimers in Plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QW7ZDREX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19180}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the self-organization of charged dust dimers in plasma using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, with emphasis on both positional and orientational ordering. For a finite number of dimers confined by a radial electric field, the system evolves from simple arrangements to ring-like structures as the particle number increases. These rings exhibit diverse orientational states, including radial, transverse, and mixed alignments of the dimer axis, reflecting a strong coupling between spatial confinement and orientational degrees of freedom. For larger systems studied under periodic boundary conditions, bulk-like behavior emerges with coupled positional and orientational correlations. The results highlight the significance of anisotropy in determining equilibrium structures and demonstrate that orientational order plays a crucial role alongside positional ordering in complex plasmas with shaped particles. This work provides motivation for experimental studies involving shaped dust particles to explore orientational ordering phenomena beyond conventional spherical dust particle systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19180 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: A schematic representation of interactions amongst [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Dynamics of a single dimer confined using a radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Dynamics of two dimers confined using a radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Dynamics of dimer clusters having 5 dimers confined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Dynamics of dimer cluster having 23 dimers confined using a radial electric field. Different orientations are observed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Order parameter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Plot of the potential energy of dimers as the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: A comparison of the order parameter calculated for dimers at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Structural arrangement of dimers in a periodic boundary condition where blue line defines the boundary. It can be seen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Average angle between the dimer centers arranged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Order parameter v/s shielding parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references

  1. [38]

    Ivlev and G

    A. Ivlev and G. Morfill, Physical Review E 63, 016409 (2000)

    2000

  2. [1]

    the energetically preferred configuration, leading to the ob- served alternation between tangential and radial ordering as the cluster structure evolves

    The minimum and maximum interaction energy configurations are shown as insets. the energetically preferred configuration, leading to the ob- served alternation between tangential and radial ordering as the cluster structure evolves. As the number of dimers in the cluster increases, maintain- ing a globally ordered radial or tangential arrangement be- come...

  3. [2]

    In this regime, thermal kinetic energy is com- parable to or larger than the interaction energy, enabling the dimers to reorient and rearrange efficiently

    toward zero. In this regime, thermal kinetic energy is com- parable to or larger than the interaction energy, enabling the dimers to reorient and rearrange efficiently. Consequently, the system quickly loses memory of its initial alignment and ap- proaches the isotropic equilibrium state. As (Γ) increases, the relaxation becomes progressively slower. In t...

    2022

  4. [3]

    Thomas, G

    H. Thomas, G. Morfill, V . Demmel, J. Goree, B. Feuerbacher, and D. Möhlmann, Physical Review Letters 73, 652 (1994)

    1994

  5. [4]

    H. M. Thomas and G. E. Morfill, Nature 379, 806 (1996)

    1996

  6. [5]

    Ichiki, Y

    R. Ichiki, Y . Ivanov, M. Wolter, Y . Kawai, and A. Melzer, Phys. Rev. E 70, 066404 (2004)

    2004

  7. [6]

    Nicolis and I

    G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Self-Organization in Nonequilib- rium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations, A Wiley-Interscience publication (Wiley, 1977), ISBN 9780471024019

    1977

  8. [7]

    Haken, Physica B+C 127, 26 (1984), ISSN 0378-4363, pro- ceedings of the 4th General Conference of the Condensed Mat- ter Division of the EPS

    H. Haken, Physica B+C 127, 26 (1984), ISSN 0378-4363, pro- ceedings of the 4th General Conference of the Condensed Mat- ter Division of the EPS

    1984

Show all 88 references
  1. [8]

    de Gennes and J

    P. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals , In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 1993), ISBN 9780198517856

    1993

  2. [9]

    Vicsek and A

    T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, Physics Reports517, 71 (2012), ISSN 0370-1573, collective motion

    2012

  3. [10]

    E. N. Lorenz, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 20, 130 (1963)

    1963

  4. [11]

    Detrain, N

    C. Detrain, N. C., and J.-L. Deneubourg, Die Naturwis- senschaften 88, 171 (2001)

    2001

  5. [12]

    Beekman, G

    M. Beekman, G. A. Sword, and S. J. Simpson, Biological Foundations of Swarm Intelligence (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 3–41, ISBN 978-3-540- 74089-6

    2008

  6. [13]

    Szopek, V

    M. Szopek, V . Stokanic, G. Radspieler, and T. Schmickl, Fron- tiers in Physics V olume 9 - 2021(2021), ISSN 2296-424X

    2021

  7. [14]

    C. W. Reynolds, SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 21, 25–34 (1987), ISSN 0097-8930

    1987

  8. [15]

    I. L. Bajec and F. H. Heppner, Animal Behaviour 78, 777 (2009)

    2009

  9. [16]

    G. M. Whitesides and B. A. Grzybowski, Science 295, 2418 (2002)

    2002

  10. [17]

    Czirók, E

    A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and T. Vicsek, Phys. Rev. E 54, 1791 (1996)

    1996

  11. [18]

    Sokolov, I

    A. Sokolov, I. S. Aranson, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 158102 (2007)

    2007

  12. [19]

    Czirók, M

    A. Czirók, M. Matsushita, and T. Vicsek, Phys. Rev. E 63, 031915 (2001)

    2001

  13. [20]

    A. M. Turing, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 237, 37 (1952), ISSN 0080- 4622

    1952

  14. [21]

    Tompkins, N

    N. Tompkins, N. Li, C. Girabawe, M. Heymann, B. Ermentrout, I. Epstein, and S. Fraden, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (2014)

    2014

  15. [22]

    R. J. Field, E. Koros, and R. M. Noyes, Journal of the American Chemical Society 94, 8649 (1972), ISSN 0002-7863

    1972

  16. [23]

    Marchettini, S

    N. Marchettini, S. Ristori, F. Rossi, and M. Rustici, Interna- tional Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 1, 55 (2013)

    2013

  17. [24]

    I. R. Epstein and J. A. Pojman, An introduction to nonlinear chemical dynamics: Oscillations, waves, patterns, and chaos (Oxford University Press, 1998)

    1998

  18. [25]

    Prigogine and R

    I. Prigogine and R. Lefever, The Journal of Chemical Physics 48, 1695 (1968)

    1968

  19. [26]

    P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987)

    1987

  20. [27]

    Decher, Science 277, 1232 (1007)

    G. Decher, Science 277, 1232 (1007)

  21. [28]

    Pieranski, Contemporary Physics 24, 25 (1983)

    P. Pieranski, Contemporary Physics 24, 25 (1983)

    1983

  22. [29]

    Ruben, J

    M. Ruben, J. Rojo, F. J. Romero-Salguero, L. H. Uppadine, and J.-M. Lehn, Angewandte Chemie International Edition43, 3644 (2004)

    2004

  23. [30]

    T. D. Seeley, The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies (Harvard University Press, 1995)

    1995

  24. [31]

    Krugman, The Self Organizing Economy(Blackwell Publish- ers, 1996), ISBN 9781557866998

    P. Krugman, The Self Organizing Economy(Blackwell Publish- ers, 1996), ISBN 9781557866998

    1996

  25. [32]

    Helbing, Rev

    D. Helbing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1067 (2001)

    2001

  26. [33]

    Glansdorff and I

    P. Glansdorff and I. Prigogine, Thermodynamic theory of struc- ture, stability and fluctuations (Wiley-Interscience, 1971)

    1971

  27. [34]

    K. G. Libbrecht, Reports on Progress in Physics 68, 855 (2005)

    2005

  28. [35]

    H. E. Stanley, Introduction to phase transitions and critical phe- nomena (Oxford University Press, 1971)

    1971

  29. [36]

    E. L. Koschmieder, Bénard cells and Taylor vortices (Cam- bridge University Press, 1993)

    1993

  30. [37]

    Hallet, Earth Sci

    B. Hallet, Earth Sci. Rev. 29, 57 (1990)

    1990

  31. [39]

    G. E. Morfill and A. V . Ivlev, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1353 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    Deshwal, M

    P. Deshwal, M. Yadav, C. Prasad, S. Sridev, Y . Ahuja, S. Maity, and A. Das, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 32 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Maity, P

    S. Maity, P. Deshwal, M. Yadav, and A. Das, Physical Review E 102, 023213 (2020). 17

    2020

  34. [42]

    M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993)

    1993

  35. [43]

    Degond, ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys 45, 1 (2014)

    P. Degond, ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys 45, 1 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    D. J. Wineland, J. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, J. Bollinger, and C. Manney, Physical review letters 59, 2935 (1987)

    1987

  37. [45]

    Diedrich, E

    F. Diedrich, E. Peik, J. Chen, W. Quint, and H. Walther, Physi- cal review letters 59, 2931 (1987)

    1987

  38. [46]

    Mortensen, E

    A. Mortensen, E. Nielsen, T. Matthey, and M. Drewsen, Physi- cal review letters 96, 103001 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    Chu and I

    J. Chu and I. Lin, Physical review letters 72, 4009 (1994)

    1994

  40. [48]

    Hayashi and K

    Y . Hayashi and K. Tachibana, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2, L804 (1994)

    1994

  41. [49]

    Y . Feng, W. Lin, W. Li, and Q. Wang, Physics of Plasmas 23, 093705 (2016), ISSN 1070-664X

    2016

  42. [50]

    Y . Feng, J. Goree, and B. Liu, Physical review letters 105, 025002 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Melzer, H

    A. Melzer, H. Krüger, D. Maier, and S. Schütt, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics 5, 11 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    N. Sato, G. Uchida, T. Kaneko, S. Shimizu, and S. Iizuka, Physics of Plasmas 8, 1786 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    V . A. Schweigert and F. m. c. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B51, 7700 (1995)

    1995

  46. [54]

    A. S. Katariya, A. Das, A. Sharma, and B. B. Sahu, Phys- ica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 476, 134692 (2025), ISSN 0167- 2789, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0167278925001691

    2025

  47. [55]

    Melzer, Physical Review E 67, 016411 (2003)

    A. Melzer, Physical Review E 67, 016411 (2003)

    2003

  48. [56]

    I. I. Lisina, c. S. Vaulina, and c. c. Lisin, Phys. Rev. E 99, 013207 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Melzer, H

    A. Melzer, H. Krüger, S. Schütt, and M. Mulsow, Physics of Plasmas 26, 093702 (2019), ISSN 1070-664X

    2019

  50. [58]

    Lai and L

    Y .-J. Lai and L. I, Phys. Rev. E60, 4743 (1999)

    1999

  51. [59]

    Yadav, P

    M. Yadav, P. Deshwal, S. Maity, and A. Das, Physical Review E 107, 055214 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Yadav, A

    M. Yadav, A. S. Katariya, A. Sharma, and A. Das, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena p. 134821 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Yadav, A

    M. Yadav, A. S. Katariya, A. Sharma, and A. Das, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 469, 134326 (2024), ISSN 0167-2789

    2024

  54. [62]

    Maity and A

    S. Maity and A. Das, Physics of Plasmas 26 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Astrakharchik, A

    G. Astrakharchik, A. Belousov, and Y . E. Lozovik, Physics Let- ters A 258, 123 (1999)

    1999

  56. [64]

    Astrakharchik, A

    G. Astrakharchik, A. Belousov, and Y . E. Lozovik, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 89, 696 (1999)

    1999

  57. [65]

    Löwen, The Journal of chemical physics 100, 6738 (1994)

    H. Löwen, The Journal of chemical physics 100, 6738 (1994)

    1994

  58. [66]

    Molotkov, A

    V . Molotkov, A. Nefedov, M. Y . Pustyl’nik, V . Torchinsky, V . Fortov, A. Khrapak, and K. Yoshino, Journal of Experimen- tal and Theoretical Physics Letters 71, 102 (2000)

    2000

  59. [67]

    B. M. Annaratone, A. G. Khrapak, A. V . Ivlev, G. Söllner, P. Bryant, R. Sütterlin, U. Konopka, K. Yoshino, M. Zuzic, H. M. Thomas, et al., Phys. Rev. E 63, 036406 (2001)

    2001

  60. [68]

    A. V . Ivlev, A. G. Khrapak, S. A. Khrapak, B. M. Annaratone, G. Morfill, and K. Yoshino, Phys. Rev. E68, 026403 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    Lisina, E

    I. Lisina, E. Lisin, and O. Vaulina, Physics of Plasmas 23 (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    Vaulina, I

    O. Vaulina, I. Lisina, and E. Lisin, Plasma Physics Reports 42, 135 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Vekselman, A

    V . Vekselman, A. Khrabry, I. Kaganovich, B. Stratton, R. Selin- sky, and Y . Raitses, Plasma Sources Science and Technology 27, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    D. J. Krajnovich, The Journal of chemical physics 102, 726 (1995)

    1995

  65. [73]

    Yamagata, A

    Y . Yamagata, A. Sharma, J. Narayan, R. Mayo, J. Newman, and K. Ebihara, Journal of Applied Physics 86, 4154 (1999)

    1999

  66. [74]

    Nica and C

    P.-E. Nica and C. Ursu, The European Physical Journal D 74, 1 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Oohara and R

    W. Oohara and R. Hatakeyama, Thin Solid Films 435, 280 (2003)

    2003

  68. [76]

    G.-W. Wang, K. Komatsu, Y . Murata, and M. Shiro, Nature387, 583 (1997)

    1997

  69. [77]

    A. A. Shvartsburg, R. R. Hudgins, R. Gutierrez, G. Jungnickel, T. Frauenheim, K. A. Jackson, and M. F. Jarrold, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 103, 5275 (1999)

    1999

  70. [78]

    Hippler, M

    R. Hippler, M. Cada, V . Stranak, Z. Hubicka, and C. Helm, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics 50, 445205 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    Hippler and C

    R. Hippler and C. Denker, Plasma Sources Science Technology 27, 065010 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    Curda, R

    P. Curda, R. Hippler, M. Cada, O. Kylián, V . Stranak, and Z. Hubicka, Surface and Coatings Technology 473, 130045 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Bogaerts and R

    A. Bogaerts and R. Gijbels, Journal of applied physics 86, 4124 (1999)

    1999

  74. [82]

    Plimpton, Journal of computational physics 117, 1 (1995)

    S. Plimpton, Journal of computational physics 117, 1 (1995)

    1995

  75. [83]

    Nosenko and J

    V . Nosenko and J. Goree, Physical review letters 93, 155004 (2004)

    2004

  76. [84]

    Konopka, G

    U. Konopka, G. E. Morfill, and L. Ratke, Physical Review Let- ters 84, 891 (2000)

    2000

  77. [85]

    P. K. Shukla and A. A. Mamun, Introduction to Dusty Plasma Physics (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadel- phia, 2002)

    2002

  78. [86]

    Nosé, Molecular physics 52, 255 (1984)

    S. Nosé, Molecular physics 52, 255 (1984)

    1984

  79. [87]

    W. G. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985)

    1985

  80. [88]

    Praburam and J

    G. Praburam and J. Goree, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 441, no. 2, p. 830-838 441, 830 (1995)

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.