pith. sign in

arxiv: 1903.06902 · v3 · pith:QWKKSDNXnew · submitted 2019-03-16 · 💻 cs.IR

A Deep Look into Neural Ranking Models for Information Retrieval

classification 💻 cs.IR
keywords rankingmodelsneuraldeepexistinglearningmethodsbeen
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Ranking models lie at the heart of research on information retrieval (IR). During the past decades, different techniques have been proposed for constructing ranking models, from traditional heuristic methods, probabilistic methods, to modern machine learning methods. Recently, with the advance of deep learning technology, we have witnessed a growing body of work in applying shallow or deep neural networks to the ranking problem in IR, referred to as neural ranking models in this paper. The power of neural ranking models lies in the ability to learn from the raw text inputs for the ranking problem to avoid many limitations of hand-crafted features. Neural networks have sufficient capacity to model complicated tasks, which is needed to handle the complexity of relevance estimation in ranking. Since there have been a large variety of neural ranking models proposed, we believe it is the right time to summarize the current status, learn from existing methodologies, and gain some insights for future development. In contrast to existing reviews, in this survey, we will take a deep look into the neural ranking models from different dimensions to analyze their underlying assumptions, major design principles, and learning strategies. We compare these models through benchmark tasks to obtain a comprehensive empirical understanding of the existing techniques. We will also discuss what is missing in the current literature and what are the promising and desired future directions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Can AI Augment Access to Justice? Public Defenders' Perspectives on AI Adoption

    cs.CY 2025-10 accept novelty 7.0

    Public defenders view AI as most useful for evidence investigation but limited in courtroom work and strategy, with adoption blocked by costs, confidentiality risks, and norms, requiring human oversight and open development.