Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 166 references

Guided progressive reconstructive imaging: a new quantization-based framework for low-dose, high-throughput and real-time analytical ptychography

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that direct ptychographic phase retrieval reduces to a linear shift-and-add of precomputed guide functions, one per detected electron.

desk verdict Sound and novel event-wise reformulation of WDD, but the real-time linear-complexity claim rides on an integer scan grid the paper acknowledges is fragile, and the asserted identity to conventional WDD is never demonstrated numerically. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.17561 v3 pith:QWOZEKFC submitted 2025-12-19 physics.app-ph

Hoelen L. Lalandec Robert , Arno Annys , Tamazouzt Chennit , Jo Verbeeck This is my paper
classification physics.app-ph
keywords ptychographyevent-drivendetectionWignerdistributiondeconvolutionphaseretrievallow-doseelectronmicroscopyguidefunctionsreal-timeimagingTimepix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that ptychographic reconstruction — recovering a specimen's phase and amplitude from overlapping scattered-intensity measurements — can be reformulated as a strictly additive process over individual detection events. Instead of storing dense diffraction frames and Fourier-transforming the whole dataset, each detected electron contributes a fixed, precomputed 'guide function' shifted to its scan position, and the reconstruction is just the cumulative sum. The authors prove this for the Wigner distribution deconvolution (WDD) method, and provide equivalent formulations for sideband integration and integrated center-of-mass imaging. If correct, this turns direct ptychography into an O(events) operation with no dense-frame storage, making real-time, low-dose phase imaging feasible on event-driven detectors and easing large-field-of-view scans.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the guide-function library G_qd(r): a set of kernel-limited, complex-valued distributions, one per detector pixel, precomputed from the probe's Wigner distribution (aperture, aberration, wavelength) and the detector MTF via a Wiener-filtered inversion. Each detected event contributes one such kernel shifted to the event's scan position; the whole reconstruction is the cumulative sum, with a normalization by the number of counts per scan position. This converts the conventional work of Fourier-transforming full frames and deconvolving in phase space into a per-event table lookup and addition, giving linear complexity in the number of events and decoupling the recons

What would settle it

Run a WDD reconstruction on an experimental dataset acquired with an event-driven detector on a non-integer or distorted scan grid, and compare the GPRI result with a conventional WDD reconstruction from the same events. If the two diverge by more than numerical precision without FFT-based interpolation, or if the processing time no longer scales linearly with event count, the central equivalence claim fails in practice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the core discovery is that a single count at detector pixel qd and scan position rs contains enough information to update the reconstruction by a known, specimen-independent quantity: the contribution equals G_qd(r − rs), where G_qd is derived solely from the known illumination (aperture, aberrations, wavelength) and the detector's modulation transfer function. Because the WDD reconstruction is linear in the intensity, summing these contributions event-by-event reproduces exactly the result of the conventional collective Wigner-deconvolution treatment. The paper derives the guide-function library in Eq. (18), shows the summation forms in Eqs. (20)–(22), and verifies

Load-bearing premise

The strongest practical premise is that the scan raster consists of a uniform grid whose step is an integer multiple of the reconstruction pixel; if real scan positions drift off this grid (microscope distortions, beam drift, fly-back, or non-grid scans), the fast shift-and-add path breaks down and the method loses its real-time advantage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A WDD ptychographic reconstruction can be produced progressively as events arrive, so the estimate improves continuously and can be displayed in real time during acquisition.
  • Because the library is specimen-independent, the same precomputed kernels serve any dataset acquired under the same illumination, eliminating per-dataset heavy transforms.
  • Reconstruction cost scales linearly with the number of events and scan positions, removing the nonlinear N² or N log N bottleneck that limits field of view in direct ptychography.
  • The method admits count-wise, frame-based, or hybrid data formats through the same additive pipeline, and extends to sideband integration and integrated center-of-mass imaging.
  • Low-dose performance matches conventional direct approaches: interpretable contrast is demonstrated in simulation down to about 10 e−/Ų.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the shift-and-add structure suggests that any linear direct-reconstruction scheme could be compiled into a kernel library, so future instrument-specific optimizations could be pushed entirely into library precomputation.
  • Editorial extension: because each event contributes independently, the approach naturally supports streaming and distributed processing across many cores without inter-event communication — a property the paper notes but does not demonstrate.
  • Editorial extension: the integer-scan-step restriction implies the practical payoff depends on scan-raster fidelity; combining the method with live scan-position correction (via beam-current or drift monitoring) would be a direct testable extension.
  • Editorial extension: the guide-function profiles show that near-aperture scattering vectors carry the most noise-robust information, which quantifies which detector annuli matter most for low-dose experiments and could guide detector design.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces 'guided progressive reconstructive imaging' (GPRI), a reformulation of analytical ptychography in which the reconstruction is built by cumulatively adding precomputed, specimen-independent guide functions, one per detected event or per detector pixel. The derivation starts from the standard WDD relation (Eq. 14), inserts a single-count intensity modeled as a product of Dirac deltas (Eq. 15), and obtains a guide-function library G_WDD_qd(r) (Eqs. 17–18). The whole reconstruction is then expressed as a shift-and-add sum over scan positions and detector events (Eqs. 20–22). The paper claims O(events) complexity, no dense frame storage, progressive/immediate feedback, and identical results to conventional WDD. Validation is by multislice simulations of a poliovirus at doses down to about 10 e⁻/Ų, using a 144×144 perfectly aligned raster. The appendix extends the same library idea to SBI and iCoM.

Significance. The mathematical reduction is elegant and appears internally consistent. If the equivalence to conventional WDD is exact up to normalization and pixelization, the event-wise shift-and-add formulation is a genuinely useful algorithmic insight: it decouples the reconstruction from FFT-based scan-to-frequency transforms and makes the cost linear in the number of events. The precomputed kernel-limited library is a practical strength, and the extension to SBI/iCoM broadens the impact. However, the headline claims of real-time, low-dose, large-field-of-view imaging are only partially supported: the real-time capability is not measured here and is delegated to ref. [33]; the low-dose demonstration is qualitative; and the linear-complexity advantage hinges on an integer-aligned scan raster that is not robust to drift or non-Cartesian scan paths.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] This section states that the ratio of the scan step to the reconstruction pixel size 'has to be a integer', and that otherwise 'FFT-based shifting becomes necessary, which defeats the purpose of the wider algorithm.' This condition is load-bearing for the O(events) real-time claim. Real event-driven acquisitions include beam drift, flyback, and non-uniform scan paths, all of which produce scan positions that are not exact integer multiples of the reconstruction pixel. No simulation or experiment with a perturbed, drifted, or non-Cartesian raster is presented; the only demonstration is a perfectly aligned 144×144 grid. The authors should either provide a quantitative analysis of the cost and accuracy of an interpolation/FFT fallback, or explicitly restrict the real-time/linear-complexity claims to integer-aligned rasters.
  2. [Conclusion and §3.3] The conclusion claims 'a result identical to that of a conventional WDD implementation was obtained', but this is not supported by the evidence shown. Figure 4 displays GPRI reconstructions for several doses, but no side-by-side comparison with a conventional WDD reconstruction of the same simulated data, no difference map, and no error metric (e.g., SSIM, RMS error, or Fourier ring correlation) are provided. Since exact equivalence is a central claim, a quantitative comparison should be supplied.
  3. [§3.3 and §4.2] The dose-efficiency conclusion rests on visual inspection of Fig. 4. The text states that results show 'the same stability against noise as demonstrated by existing workflows', but no quantitative comparison with conventional WDD, SBI, or iterative methods is made. Likewise, the real-time throughput claim ('processing speed high enough to surpass the acquisition bandwidth', §4.2) is not measured anywhere in this manuscript; it is delegated to ref. [33]. Please include at least a timing/memory benchmark of the GPRI update loop, or soften the claims to statements about algorithmic complexity.
  4. [Eqs. (20) and (21)] The pattern-wise normalization in Eq. (20) divides by n(r_s), the number of counts at scan position r_s. In the low-dose regime that is central to the paper, many scan positions will have n(r_s)=0, and the formula as written is undefined there. The authors should specify the convention for empty scan positions (e.g., omit them from the sum or define 0/0=0) and demonstrate that this convention does not bias the result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1] 'the ratio of the scan step over it has to be a integer' should read 'an integer'.
  2. [§2.4] The sentence 'thus by a simple summation of individual qd-selected and rs-shifted guide functions G_WDD_qd(r), was also devised in subsection 1.3' is grammatically incomplete; please revise for clarity.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] 'The exception is the case of a)' should be 'the case of panel (a)'.
  4. [Appendix, Eqs. (25) and (27)] The notation \tilde{G}^{SBI}_{q_d}(r) mixes Fourier-domain tilde notation with a real-space argument r. Please clarify which quantity is defined in which space.
  5. [§1.3, Eq. (4)] The claim that 'an additive cumulation of the contributions then leads to the same result as a collective treatment' is introduced before the WDD-specific definition of ΔT. It would help to state explicitly the class of reconstruction operators for which this linearity holds.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the event-wise GPRI result is a linear rearrangement of the established WDD Wiener filter, not an input-equivalent prediction.

full rationale

The central equivalence is derived by substitution, not assumed: Eqs. (15)-(16) insert a single-count delta into the established WDD phase-space relation (Eq. 14, from the original WDD literature), and Eq. (18) defines the guide function as the resulting illumination-only kernel. Because Eq. (14) is linear in the reformed data J, Eqs. (20)-(22) follow by direct summation; the 'additive cumulation ... same result as a collective treatment' claim in Eq. (4) is an algebraic consequence of linearity, not a fitted or self-defined outcome. The simulations use abTEM multislice data and an external poliovirus structure, so the reconstruction target is not an input to the library calculation. The integer scan-step condition in Sec. 3.1 is a practical constraint on the linear-complexity implementation, not a circular step; the paper explicitly states that non-integer ratios force FFT-based shifting and defeat the algorithm's purpose. The main references to the authors' own prior work ([33], [40], [100]) support the event-driven acquisition platform, the Wiener-parameter and normalization choices, and the patent-named framework; none of those citations supplies the mathematical equivalence itself. The conclusion's assertion of identity with conventional WDD is not backed by a quantitative side-by-side comparison, but that is a verification gap, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on established WDD/phase-object assumptions plus one practical grid constraint. No specimen-dependent physical constants or fitted parameters are introduced; the only hand-chosen numbers are numerical regularization and kernel-size settings.

free parameters (4)
  • Wiener parameter epsilon = 1e-6
    Chosen by hand following ref [40]; regularizes the division in Eqs (14)/(18) and affects the noise-vs-resolution balance.
  • Final kernel radius for count updates = 8 x Abbe radius, with Hann window
    User-defined in Section 3.3; limits the updated region per event and is chosen to avoid frequency-transfer modifications.
  • Initial calculation radius for library = 16 x Abbe radius
    User-defined in Section 3.3 for the r/Q grid; chosen to avoid FFT aliasing in guide-function generation.
  • Scattering-vector cutoff = 4 q_A
    User-defined in Section 3.3; uses an extended dark-field range and affects resolution and noise behavior.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Phase object approximation T(r0) = exp(i phi(r0))
    Eq (9); assumes a thin, elastic, single-scattering specimen, which is central to the multiplicative WDD model.
  • domain assumption Fully coherent, aperture-limited probe with known aberration function
    Eqs (7)-(8); the guide-function library is valid only if the probe is known and constant across the scan.
  • domain assumption Multiplicative interaction model Psi = P * T
    Eq (3); neglects in-specimen propagation beyond the phase-object approximation.
  • standard math Wigner-distribution deconvolution relation Eq (12)/(14)
    Taken from refs [89,90]; requires high overlap between adjacent scan positions and is the basis for Eqs (16)-(18).
  • domain assumption Single detected electron represented by a Dirac delta in (rs, qd)
    Eq (15); assumes point-event representation; finite pixel size and clustering are handled only through a zero-opening MTF.
  • ad hoc to paper Scan positions lie on a uniform integer-aligned grid
    Section 3.1 integer-ratio condition; if violated, FFT shifting is required and the O(events) complexity is lost.
  • domain assumption Experimental intensity is an unbiased estimate of the underlying scattered intensity
    Section 1.4; underlies the normalization in Eqs (20)-(21) and the equivalence to conventional WDD.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Guided progressive reconstructive imaging: a new quantization-based framework for low-dose, high-throughput and real-time analytical ptychography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QWOZEKFC

@misc{pith2026251217561,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Guided progressive reconstructive imaging: a new quantization-based framework for low-dose, high-throughput and real-time analytical ptychography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QWOZEKFC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.17561}
}
read the original abstract

By profiting from recent developments in detector technologies, making it possible to access a stream of detection events with few-ns time resolutions, a new ptychographic workflow is established. This methodological framework, referred to as guided progressive reconstructive imaging, relies on a quantization-based description of the acquired intensity, through an elementary derivation. Established direct phase retrieval solutions, such as the Wigner distribution deconvolution approach, can then be adapted to a continuous treatment of received counts, with no need for a dense data representation. Consequently, the result is obtained in the form of a progressively improving estimate, while providing immediate user feedback thanks to a processing speed high enough to surpass the acquisition bandwidth. This fast measurement is enabled by the cumulative usage of a pre-calculated library of kernel-limited functions, accumulating count-wise contributions as a function of the triggered detector pixel. Hence, the reconstruction offers the same advantages of direct phase retrieval methods, in particular a high dose-efficiency and the absence of complex convergence dynamics, with much less stringent restrictions on the field of view than is typical in current alternatives. Its implementation is also significantly more straightforward and flexible. Overall, this work constitutes a major evolution in the state-of-the-art, facilitating repeatable and low-dose experiments with high accessibility, and being applicable to electron-based imaging, X-ray diffraction and optical microscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.17561 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of a STEM-based scattering experiment and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. fig. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the practical processing in GPRI. The kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Depiction of a library GWDD ⃗q (⃗r) along ⃗r, for a few indicated values of ⃗q = [ qx ; 0 ], equal to fractions of the aperture radius qA. No MTF is included in the calculation, hence the use of the scattering vector dimension directly. For each case, both the imaginar…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of GPRI-based WDD imaging, employing simulated scattering pattern. The concerned specimen is a poliovirus, illuminated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Annys, H

    A. Annys, H. L. L. Robert, S. Gholam, J. Ha- dermann, J. Verbeeck, Removing constraints of 4D-STEM with a framework for event- driven acquisition and processing, Ultrami- croscopy 277 (2025) 114206.arXiv:2505.06602, doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2025.114206. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06602https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0304399125001044

    arXiv 2025

  2. [100]

    H. L. Lalandec Robert, J. Verbeeck, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF AN IMAGE FROM ELECTRON DIFFRACTION DATA, International application published under the patent cooperation treaty (PCT), with number WO 2025/124784 A1 (2025)

    2025

  3. [1]

    Rodenburg, A

    J. Rodenburg, A. Maiden, Ptychography, in: Springer Handbooks, Springer, 2019, pp. 819–904. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00069-1_17. URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 978-3-030-00069-1_17

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00069-1_17 2019

  4. [2]

    R. Wang, Q. Zhao, L. Loetgering, F. Allars, Z. Hong, T. J. Pennycook, R. Horstmeyer, J. Ro- denburg, A. Maiden, G. Zheng, Ptychography at all wavelengths, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 5 (1) (2025) 68.doi:10.1038/s43586-025-00438-3. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s43586-025-00438-3

    doi:10.1038/s43586-025-00438-3 2025

  5. [3]

    Hoppe, Beugung im inhomogenen Primärstrahlwellenfeld

    W. Hoppe, Beugung im inhomogenen Primärstrahlwellenfeld. I. Prinzip einer Phasenmes- sung von Elektronenbeungungsinterferenzen, Acta Crystallographica Section A 25 (4) (1969) 495–501. doi:10.1107/S0567739469001045. URLhttps://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/ paper?S0567739469001045

    work page doi:10.1107/s0567739469001045 1969

  6. [4]

    Hoppe, G

    W. Hoppe, G. Strube, Beugung in inhomoge- nen Primärstrahlenwellenfeld. II. Lichtoptische Analogieversuche zur Phasenmessung von Gitterin- terferenzen, Acta Crystallographica Section A 25 (4) (1969) 502–507.doi:10.1107/S0567739469001057. URLhttps://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/ paper?S0567739469001057

    work page doi:10.1107/s0567739469001057 1969

  7. [5]

    Hoppe, Beugung im inhomogenen Primärstrahlwellenfeld

    W. Hoppe, Beugung im inhomogenen Primärstrahlwellenfeld. III. Amplituden- und Phasenbestimmung bei unperiodischen Objekten, Acta Crystallographica Section A 25 (4) (1969) 508–514.doi:10.1107/S0567739469001069. URLhttps://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/ paper?S0567739469001069

    work page doi:10.1107/s0567739469001069 1969

  8. [6]

    Miao, Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychog- raphy, Nature 637 (8045) (2025) 281–295

    J. Miao, Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychog- raphy, Nature 637 (8045) (2025) 281–295. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08278-z. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-08278-zhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/s41586-024-08278-z

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08278-z 2025

Show all 166 references
  1. [8]

    H. M. Faulkner, J. M. Rodenburg, Movable aper- ture lensless transmission microscopy: A novel phase retrieval algorithm, Physical Review Letters 93 (2) (2004)2–5.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.023903

    2004 doi

  2. [9]

    J. M. Rodenburg, H. M. Faulkner, A phase retrieval algorithm for shifting illumination, Applied Physics Letters 85 (20) (2004) 4795–4797.doi:10.1063/1. 1823034

    2004 doi

  3. [10]

    Thibault, M

    P. Thibault, M. Dierolf, A. Menzel, O. Bunk, C. David, F. Pfeiffer, High-resolution scanning X- ray diffraction microscopy, Science 321 (5887) (2008) 379–382.doi:10.1126/science.1158573

    2008 doi

  4. [11]

    Guizar-Sicairos, J

    M. Guizar-Sicairos, J. R. Fienup, Phase retrieval with transverse translation diversity: a nonlinear op- timization approach, Optics Express 16 (10) (2008) 7264.doi:10.1364/oe.16.007264

    2008 doi

  5. [12]

    Müller, A

    K. Müller, A. Rosenauer, M. Schowalter, J. Zweck, R. Fritz, K. Volz, Strain Measure- ment in Semiconductor Heterostructures by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy, Mi- croscopy and Microanalysis 18 (5) (2012) 995–1009. doi:10.1017/S1431927612001274. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/...

    2012 doi

  6. [13]

    McMullan, D

    G. McMullan, D. Cattermole, S. Chen, R. Hen- derson, X. Llopart, C. Summerfield, L. Tlustos, A. Faruqi, Electron imaging with Medipix2 hybrid pixel detector, Ultramicroscopy 107 (4-5) (2007) 401–413.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.10.005. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrie...

    2007 doi

  7. [14]

    Ballabriga, M

    R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell, E. Heijne, X. Llopart, L. Tlustos, W. Wong, Medipix3: A 64k pixel detector readout chip working in single pho- ton counting mode with improved spectrometric performance, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelera- tors...

    2011 doi

  8. [15]

    Plackett, I

    R. Plackett, I. Horswell, E. N. Gimenez, J. Mar- chal, D. Omar, N. Tartoni, Merlin: a fast 15 versatile readout system for Medipix3, Jour- nal of Instrumentation 8 (1) (2013) C01038. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/01/C01038. URLhttp://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1088/1748-0221/8/0...

    2013 doi

  9. [16]

    H. Ryll, M. Simson, R. Hartmann, P. Holl, M. Huth, S. Ihle, Y. Kondo, P. Kotula, A. Liebel, K. Müller- Caspary, A. Rosenauer, R. Sagawa, J. Schmidt, H. Soltau, L. Strüder, A pnCCD-based, fast direct single electron imaging camera for TEM and STEM, J. Instrum. 11 (04) (2016) P0...

    2016 doi

  10. [17]

    M. W. Tate, P. Purohit, D. Chamberlain, K. X. Nguyen, R. Hovden, C. S. Chang, P. Deb, E. Turgut, J.T.Heron, D.G.Schlom, D.C.Ralph, G.D.Fuchs, K. S. Shanks, H. T. Philipp, D. A. Muller, S. M. Gruner, High Dynamic Range Pixel Array Detec- tor for Scanning Transmission Electron M...

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    H. T. Philipp, M. W. Tate, K. S. Shanks, L. Mele, M. Peemen, P. Dona, R. Hartong, G. van Veen, Y.-T. Shao, Z. Chen, J. Thom-Levy, D. A. Muller, S. M. Gruner, Very-High Dynamic Range, 10,000 Frames/Second Pixel Array Detector for Electron Microscopy, Microscopy and Microanal- y...

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Zambon, S

    P. Zambon, S. Bottinelli, R. Schnyder, D. Musarra, D. Boye, A. Dudina, N. Lehmann, S. De Carlo, M. Rissi, C. Schulze-Briese, M. Meffert, M. Cam- panini, R. Erni, L. Piazza, KITE: High frame rate, high count rate pixelated electron counting ASIC for 4D STEM applications featuri...

    2022

  13. [20]

    Ercius, I

    P. Ercius, I. J. Johnson, P. Pelz, B. H. Savitzky, L. Hughes, H. G. Brown, S. E. Zeltmann, S.-L. Hsu, C. C. S. Pedroso, B. E. Cohen, R. Ramesh, D. Paul, J. M. Joseph, T. Stezelberger, C. Czarnik, M. Lent, E. Fong, J. Ciston, M. C. Scott, C. Ophus, A. M. Minor, P. Denes, The 4D...

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    H. Yang, L. Jones, H. Ryll, M. Simson, H. Soltau, Y. Kondo, R. Sagawa, H. Banba, I. MacLaren, P. D. Nellist, 4D STEM: High efficiency phase contrast imaging using a fast pixelated detector, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 644 (1) (2015) 12032.doi:10.1088/ 1742-6596/644/1/012032. URLhttp:...

    2015

  15. [22]

    Müller-Caspary, F

    K. Müller-Caspary, F. F. Krause, F. Winkler, A. Béché, J. Verbeeck, S. Van Aert, A. Rosenauer, S. VanAert, A. Rosenauer, Comparison of first moment STEM with conventional differential phase contrast and the dependence on electron dose, Ultramicroscopy accepted (August 2018) (2...

    2018 doi

  16. [23]

    Strauch, D

    A. Strauch, D. Weber, A. Clausen, A. Lesnichaia, A. Bangun, B. März, F. J. Lyu, Q. Chen, A. Rosenauer, R. Dunin-Borkowski, K. Müller- Caspary, Live Processing of Momentum-Resolved STEM Data for First Moment Imaging and Pty- chography, Microscopy and Microanalysis 27 (5) (2021)...

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    C.-P. Yu, T. Friedrich, D. Jannis, S. Van Aert, J. Verbeeck, Real-Time Integration Center of Mass (riCOM) Reconstruction for 4D STEM, Microscopy and Microanalysis 28 (5) (2022) 1526–1537.arXiv:2112.04442, doi:10.1017/S1431927622000617. URLhttps://academic.oup.com/mam/article/ ...

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Bangun, P

    A. Bangun, P. F. Baumeister, A. Clausen, D. Weber, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, Wigner Distribution De- convolution Adaptation for Live Ptychography Re- construction, Microscopy and Microanalysis 29 (3) (2023) 994–1008.arXiv:2212.01309,doi:10. 1093/micmic/ozad021. URLhttps://doi.org...

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Weber, S

    D. Weber, S. Ehrig, A. Schropp, A. Clausen, S. Achilles, N. Hoffmann, M. Bussmann, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, C. G. Schroer, Live Iterative Ptychography, Microscopy and Microanalysis 30 (1) (2024) 103–117.arXiv:2308.10674, 16 doi:10.1093/mam/ozae004. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2308.1...

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Poikela, J

    T. Poikela, J. Plosila, T. Westerlund, M. Campbell, M. D. Gaspari, X. Llopart, V. Gromov, R. Kluit, M. V. Beuzekom, F. Zappon, V. Zivkovic, C. Brez- ina, K. Desch, Y. Fu, A. Kruth, Timepix3: a 65K channel hybrid pixel readout chip with simultane- ous ToA/ToT and sparse readout...

    2014 doi

  21. [28]

    Frojdh, M

    E. Frojdh, M. Campbell, M. D. Gaspari, S. Kulis, X. Llopart, T. Poikela, L. Tlustos, Timepix3: first measurements and characterization of a hybrid-pixel detector working in event driven mode, Journal of Instrumentation 10 (01) (2015) C01039–C01039. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/01/...

    2015 doi

  22. [29]

    Llopart, J

    X. Llopart, J. Alozy, R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell, R. Casanova, V. Gromov, E. Heijne, T. Poikela, E. Santin, V. Sriskaran, L. Tlustos, A. Vitkovskiy, Timepix4, a large area pixel detector readout chip which can be tiled on 4 sides providing sub-200 ps timestamp binning, Journal...

    2022 doi

  23. [30]

    Y. Auad, J. Baaboura, J. D. Blazit, M. Tencé, O. Stéphan, M. Kociak, L. H. Tizei, Time calibration studies for the Timepix3 hybrid pixel detector in electron microscopy, Ultrami- croscopy 257 (November 2023) (2024) 113889. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113889. URLhttps://doi.org...

    2023

  24. [31]

    Kuttruff, J

    J. Kuttruff, J. Holder, Y. Meng, P. Baum, Real-time electron clustering in an event- driven hybrid pixel detector, Ultrami- croscopy 255 (September 2023) (2024) 113864. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113864. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2023.113864

    2023

  25. [32]

    Jannis, C

    D. Jannis, C. Hofer, C. Gao, X. Xie, A. Béché, T. Pennycook, J. Verbeeck, Event driven 4D STEM acquisition with a Timepix3 detector: Microsecond dwell time and faster scans for high precision and low dose applications, Ultramicroscopy 233 (Oc- tober 2021) (2022) 113423.arXiv:2...

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Pfeiffer, X-ray ptychography, Nature Pho- tonics 12 (1) (2018) 9–17.doi:10.1038/ s41566-017-0072-5

    F. Pfeiffer, X-ray ptychography, Nature Pho- tonics 12 (1) (2018) 9–17.doi:10.1038/ s41566-017-0072-5

    2018

  27. [35]

    Egerton, Radiation damage to organic and inorganic specimens in the TEM, Mi- cron 119 (January) (2019) 72–87.doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2019.01.005

    R. Egerton, Radiation damage to organic and inorganic specimens in the TEM, Mi- cron 119 (January) (2019) 72–87.doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2019.01.005. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2019. 01.005https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0968432818304359

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    T. J. Pennycook, G. T. Martinez, P. D. Nel- list, J. C. Meyer, High dose efficiency atomic resolution imaging via electron ptychography, Ul- tramicroscopy 196 (October 2018) (2019) 131–135. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.10.005. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2018.10.005

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    C. M. O’Leary, C. S. Allen, C. Huang, J. S. Kim, E. Liberti, P. D. Nellist, A. I. Kirkland, Phase reconstruction using fast binary 4D STEM data, Applied Physics Letters 116 (12) (2020) 124101. doi:10.1063/1.5143213. URLhttps://pubs.aip.org/apl/ article/116/12/124101/570971/ Ph...

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    C. M. O’Leary, G. T. Martinez, E. Liberti, M. J. Humphry, A. I. Kirkland, P. D. Nellist, Contrast transfer and noise considerations in focused-probe electron ptychography, Ultrami- croscopy 221 (December 2020) (2021) 113189. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113189. URLhttps://doi.o...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Jílek, T

    Z. Jílek, T. Radlička, V. Krzyžánek, Simulation Study of Low-Dose 4D-STEM Phase Contrast Tech- niques at the Nanoscale in SEM, Nanomaterials 17 15 (1) (2025) 70.doi:10.3390/nano15010070. URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/15/1/70

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    H. L. Lalandec Robert, M. L. Leidl, K. Müller- Caspary, J. Verbeeck, Benchmarking analytical electron ptychography methods for the low-dose imaging of beam-sensitive materials, The European Physical Journal Applied Physics 100 (2025) 20. arXiv:2501.08874,doi:10.1051/epjap/2025...

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Dearg, N

    M. Dearg, N. Michaelides, J. Gilbert, Z. Ding, Z. Aslam, D. Hopkinson, C. Allen, L. Clark, Stabil- ity of electron ptychography at low electron dose, Journal of Microscopy (February) (2025) 1–10. doi:10.1111/jmi.70011. URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/jmi.70011

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    H. Yang, R. N. Rutte, L. Jones, M. Simson, R. Sagawa, H. Ryll, M. Huth, T. J. Pennycook, M. L. H. Green, H. Soltau, Y. Kondo, B. G. Davis, P. D. Nellist, Simultaneous atomic-resolution elec- tron ptychography and Z-contrast imaging of light and heavy elements in complex nanost...

    2016 doi

  35. [44]

    P. Wang, F. Zhang, S. Gao, M. Zhang, A. I. Kirkland, Electron ptychographic diffractive imag- ing of boron atoms in LaB 6 crystals, Scien- tific Reports 7 (1) (2017) 1–8.doi:10.1038/ s41598-017-02778-x

    2017

  36. [46]

    M. L. Leidl, C. Sachse, K. Müller-Caspary, Dy- namical scattering in ice-embedded proteins in conventional and scanning transmission elec- tron microscopy, IUCrJ 10 (4) (2023) 867–876. doi:10.1107/S2052252523004505. URLhttps://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/ paper?S2052252523004505

    2023 doi

  37. [47]

    J. G. Lozano, G. T. Martinez, L. Jin, P. D. Nel- list, P. G. Bruce, Low-Dose Aberration-Free Imag- ing of Li-Rich Cathode Materials at Various States of Charge Using Electron Ptychography, Nano Let- ters 18 (11) (2018) 6850–6855.doi:10.1021/acs. nanolett.8b02718

    2018 doi

  38. [48]

    W. Song, M. A. Pérez-Osorio, J.-J. Marie, E. Lib- erti, X. Luo, C. O’Leary, R. A. House, P. G. Bruce, P. D. Nellist, Direct imaging of oxygen shifts associated with the oxygen redox of Li-rich layered oxides, Joule 6 (5) (2022) 1049–1065. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.008. URLht...

    2022 doi

  39. [49]

    W. Song, M. A. Pérez-Osorio, J. Chen, Z. Ding, J.-J. Marie, M. Juelsholt, R. A. House, P. G. Bruce, P. D. Nellist, Visualization of Tetrahedral Li in the Al- kali Layers of Li-Rich Layered Metal Oxides, Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (34) (2024) 23814–23824.doi:1...

    2024 doi

  40. [50]

    H. Sha, J. Cui, J. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Yang, Y. Li, R. Yu, Ptychographic measurements of varying size and shape along zeolite channels, Science Advances 9 (11) (2023) 1–8.doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf1151. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adf1151

    2023 doi

  41. [51]

    Zhang, G

    H. Zhang, G. Li, J. Zhang, D. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Liu, P. Guo, Y. Zhu, C. Chen, L. Liu, X. Guo, Y. Han, Three-dimensional inhomogeneity of zeolite structure and composition revealed by electron ptychography, Science 380 (6645) (2023) 633–638. doi:10.1126/science.adg3183. URLhtt...

    2023 doi

  42. [52]

    Z. Dong, E. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Q. Zhang, A. May- oral, H. Jiang, Y. Ma, Atomic-Level Imaging of Zeo- lite Local Structures Using Electron Ptychography, Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (12) (2023) 6628–6632.doi:10.1021/jacs.2c12673. URLhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.102...

    2023 doi

  43. [53]

    Mitsuishi, K

    K. Mitsuishi, K. Nakazawa, R. Sagawa, M. Shimizu, H. Matsumoto, H. Shima, T. Takewaki, Direct observation of Cu in high-silica chabazite zeolite by electron ptychography using Wigner distribution deconvolution, Scientific Reports 13 (1) (2023) 316. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27452...

    2023 doi

  44. [54]

    B. Hao, Z. Ding, X. Tao, P. D. Nellist, H. E. Assender, Atomic-scale imaging of polyvinyl 18 alcohol crystallinity using electron ptychog- raphy, Polymer 284 (August) (2023) 126305. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2023.126305. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer. 2023.126305https://lin...

    2023

  45. [55]

    Chen, T.-C

    Y. Chen, T.-C. Chou, C.-H. Fang, C.-Y. Lu, C.-N. Hsiao, W.-T. Hsu, C.-C. Chen, Direct observation of single-atom defects in monolayer two-dimensional materials by using electron ptychography at 200 kV acceleration voltage, Scientific Reports 14 (1) (2024) 277.doi:10.1038/s4159...

    2024 doi

  46. [56]

    L. Loh, S. Ning, D. Kieczka, Y. Chen, J. Yang, Z. Wang, S. J. Pennycook, G. Eda, A. L. Shluger, M. Bosman, Electron Ptychography for Atom- by-Atom Quantification of 1D Defect Complexes in Monolayer MoS 2, ACS Nano (feb 2025). doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c14988. URLhttps://pubs.acs.or...

    2025 doi

  47. [57]

    Hofer, J

    C. Hofer, J. Madsen, T. Susi, T. J. Penny- cook, Detecting charge transfer at defects in 2D materials with electron ptychography, Journal of Microscopy (December 2024) (2025) 1–11. arXiv:2301.04469,doi:10.1111/jmi.13404. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04469https: //onlinelibrary...

    2024 arXiv

  48. [58]

    G. Li, M. Xu, W.-q. Tang, Y. Liu, C. Chen, D. Zhang, L. Liu, S. Ning, H. Zhang, Z.-y. Gu, Z. Lai, D. A. Muller, Y. Han, Atomically resolved imaging of radiation-sensitive metal- organic frameworks via electron ptychography, Nature Communications 16 (1) (2025) 914. doi:10.1038/...

    2025 doi

  49. [59]

    Scheid, Y

    A. Scheid, Y. Wang, M. Jung, T. Heil, D. Moia, J. Maier, P. A. van Aken, Electron Ptychographic Phase Imaging of Beam-sensitive All-inorganic Halide Perovskites Using Four-dimensional Scan- ning Transmission Electron Microscopy, Mi- croscopy and Microanalysis 29 (3) (2023) 869...

    2023 doi

  50. [60]

    B. Yuan, Z. Wang, S. Zhang, C. Hofer, C. Gao, T. Chennit, H. Shi, X. Wu, Y. Han, L. Dou, Y. Yu, T. J. Pennycook, Atomically resolved edges and defects in lead halide per- ovskites, Nature 647 (8089) (2025) 364–368. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09693-6. URLhttps://www.nature.com/arti...

    2025 doi

  51. [61]

    L. Zhou, J. Song, J. S. Kim, X. Pei, C. Huang, M. Boyce, L. Mendonça, D. Clare, A. Siebert, C. S. Allen, E. Liberti, D. Stuart, X. Pan, P. D. Nellist, P. Zhang, A. I. Kirkland, P. Wang, Low-dose phase retrieval of biological specimens using cryo-electron ptychography, Nature C...

    2020 doi

  52. [62]

    X. Pei, L. Zhou, C. Huang, M. Boyce, J. S. Kim, E. Liberti, Y. Hu, T. Sasaki, P. D. Nellist, P. Zhang, D. I. Stuart, A. I. Kirkland, P. Wang, Cryogenic electron ptychographic single particle analysis with wide bandwidth information trans- fer, Nature Communications 14 (1) (202...

    2023 doi

  53. [63]

    Küçükoğlu, I

    B. Küçükoğlu, I. Mohammed, R. C. Guerrero- Ferreira, S. M. Ribet, G. Varnavides, M. L. Leidl, K. Lau, S. Nazarov, A. Myasnikov, M. Kube, J.Radecke, C.Sachse, K.Müller-Caspary, C.Ophus, H. Stahlberg, Low-dose cryo-electron ptychogra- phy of proteins at sub-nanometer resolution,...

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    Cheng, N

    Y. Cheng, N. Grigorieff, P. A. Penczek, T. Walz, A Primer to Single-Particle Cryo- Electron Microscopy, Cell 161 (3) (2015) 438–449. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.050. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015. 03.050https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0092867415003700

    2015 doi

  55. [65]

    Nakane, A

    T. Nakane, A. Kotecha, A. Sente, G. McMul- lan, S. Masiulis, P. M. G. E. Brown, I. T. Grigoras, L. Malinauskaite, T. Malinauskas, J. Miehling, T. Uchański, L. Yu, D. Karia, E. V. Pechnikova, E. de Jong, J. Keizer, M. Bischoff, J. McCormack, P. Tiemeijer, S. W. Hardwick, D. Y. ...

    2020 doi

  56. [66]

    Thibault, M

    P. Thibault, M. Guizar-Sicairos, Maximum- likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging, New Journal of Physics 14 (2012) 1–20. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/6/063004

    2012 doi

  57. [67]

    Odstrčil, A

    M. Odstrčil, A. Menzel, M. Guizar-Sicairos, Itera- tive least-squares solver for generalized maximum- likelihood ptychography, Optics Express 26 (3) (2018) 3108.doi:10.1364/oe.26.003108

    2018 doi

  58. [68]

    Schloz, T

    M. Schloz, T. C. Pekin, Z. Chen, W. Van den Broek, D. A. Muller, C. T. Koch, Overcoming in- formation reduced data and experimentally uncer- tain parameters in ptychography with regularized optimization, Optics Express 28 (19) (2020) 28306. arXiv:2005.01530,doi:10.1364/oe.396925

    2020 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Z. Chen, Y. Jiang, Y.-T. T. Shao, M. E. Holtz, M. Odstrčil, M. Guizar-Sicairos, I. Hanke, S. Gan- schow, D. G. Schlom, D. A. Muller, Electron pty- chography achieves atomic-resolution limits set by lattice vibrations, Science 372 (6544) (2021) 826– 831.arXiv:2101.00465,doi:10....

    2021 arXiv

  60. [70]

    H. Sha, J. Cui, R. Yu, Deep sub-angstrom resolution imaging by electron ptychography with misorienta- tion correction, Science Advances 8 (19) (2022) 1–7. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn2275. URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/ sciadv.abn2275

    2022 doi

  61. [71]

    Maiden, W

    A. Maiden, W. Mei, P. Li, WASP: Weighted Average of Sequential Projections for ptychographic phase re- trieval, Optics Express 32 (12) (2024) 21327–21344. doi:10.1364/oe.516946

    2024 doi

  62. [72]

    Marchesini, H

    S. Marchesini, H. Krishnan, B. J. Daurer, D. A. Shapiro, T. Perciano, J. A. Sethian, F. R. Maia, SHARP: A distributed GPU-based ptychographic solver, Journal of Applied Crystallography 49 (4) (2016) 1245–1252.arXiv:1602.01448,doi:10. 1107/S1600576716008074

    2016 arXiv

  63. [73]

    Wakonig, H

    K. Wakonig, H. C. Stadler, M. Odstrcil, E. H. Tsai, A. DIaz, M. Holler, I. Usov, J. Raabe, A. Men- zel, M. Guizar-Sicairos, PtychoShelves, a versa- tile high-level framework for high-performance anal- ysis of ptychographic data, Journal of Applied Crystallography 53 (2020) 574...

    2020

  64. [74]

    X. Yu, V. Nikitin, D. J. Ching, S. Aslan, D. Gürsoy, T. Biçer, Scalable and accurate multi-GPU-based image reconstruction of large-scale ptychography data, Scientific Re- ports 12 (1) (2022) 1–16.arXiv:2106.07575, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09430-3. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41...

    2022 arXiv

  65. [75]

    X. Wang, A. Tsaris, D. Mukherjee, M. Wahib, P. Chen, M. Oxley, O. Ovchinnikova, J. Hin- kle, Image Gradient Decomposition for Parallel and Memory-Efficient Ptychographic Recon- struction, in: SC22: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Network- ing, Storage ...

    2022 arXiv

  66. [76]

    Gilgenbach, J

    C. Gilgenbach, J. M. LeBeau, phaser: An all-in- one package for (multislice) electron ptychography (2025) 34–38arXiv:2505.14372. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14372

    2025 arXiv

  67. [77]

    C.-H. Lee, S. E. Zeltmann, D. Yoon, D. Ma, D. A. Muller, PtyRAD: A High-performance and Flexible Ptychographic Reconstruction Framework with Au- tomatic Differentiation (2016) (may 2025).arXiv: 2505.07814. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07814

    2016 arXiv

  68. [78]

    Skoupy, E

    R. Skoupy, E. Müller, T. J. Pennycook, M. Guizar- Sicairos, E. Fabbri, E. Poghosyan, Ptychoscopy: a user friendly experimental design tool for pty- chography, Scientific Reports 15 (1) (2025) 24959. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09871-6. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41598-025-09871-6

    2025 doi

  69. [79]

    Mukherjee, K

    D. Mukherjee, K. M. Roccapriore, A. Al-Najjar, A. Ghosh, J. D. Hinkle, A. R. Lupini, R. K. Vasudevan, S. V. Kalinin, O. S. Ovchinnikova, M. A. Ziatdinov, N. S. Rao, A Roadmap for Edge Computing Enabled Automated Multidimensional Transmission Electron Microscopy, Microscopy Tod...

    2022 arXiv

  70. [80]

    S. S. Welborn, C. Harris, S. M. Ribet, G. Varna- vides, C. Ophus, B. Enders, P. Ercius, Streaming Large-Scale Microscopy Data to a Supercomputing Facility, Microscopy and Microanalysis (2024) 1– 9arXiv:2407.03215,doi:10.1093/mam/ozae109. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03215https...

    2024 arXiv

  71. [81]

    Katkovnik, J

    V. Katkovnik, J. Astola, Sparse ptychographical coherent diffractive imaging from noisy measure- ments, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 30 (3) (2013) 367.doi:10.1364/JOSAA.30.000367. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm? URI=josaa-30-3-367

    2013 doi

  72. [82]

    Chennit, S

    T. Chennit, S. Li, H. L. Lalandec Robert, C. Hofer, N. J. Schrenker, L. Manna, S. Bals, T. J. Pen- nycook, J. Verbeeck, Investigating the conver- gence properties of iterative ptychography for atomic-resolution low-dose imaging, Ultrami- croscopy 278 (2025) 114245.arXiv:2507.0...

    2025

  73. [83]

    Maiden, D

    A. Maiden, D. Johnson, P. Li, Further improvements to the ptychographical iterative engine, Optica 4 (7) (2017) 736.doi:10.1364/optica.4.000736

    2017 doi

  74. [84]

    Bangun, O

    A. Bangun, O. Melnyk, B. Marz, B. Diederichs, A. Clausen, D. Weber, F. Filbir, K. Muller-Caspary, Inverse Multislice Ptychography by Layer-wise Op- timisation and Sparse Matrix Decomposition, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 8 (2022) 1–16.arXiv:2205.03902,doi:10.1109...

    2022 arXiv

  75. [85]

    M. L. Leidl, B. Diederichs, C. Sachse, K. Müller- Caspary, Influence of loss function and electron dose on ptychography of 2D materials using the Wirtinger flow, Micron 185 (July) (2024) 103688. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2024.103688. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2024. 103688...

    2024

  76. [86]

    Müller, F

    K. Müller, F. F. Krause, A. Béché, M. Schowal- ter, V. Galioit, S. Löffler, J. Verbeeck, J. Zweck, P. Schattschneider, A. Rosenauer, Atomic electric fields revealed by a quantum mechanical approach to electron picodiffraction, Nature Communications 5 (1) (2014) 5653.doi:10.103...

    2014 doi

  77. [87]

    Lazić, E

    I. Lazić, E. G. T. Bosch, S. Lazar, Phase contrast {STEM} for thin samples: Inte- grated differential phase contrast, Ultrami- croscopy 160 (2016) 265–280.doi:http: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.011. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0304399115300449

    2016 doi

  78. [88]

    Yücelen, I

    E. Yücelen, I. Lazic, E. G. T. Bosch, I. Lazić, E. G. T. Bosch, Phase contrast scanning trans- mission electron microscopy imaging of light and heavy atoms at the limit of contrast and resolution, Scientific Reports 8 (1) (2018) 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20377-2. URLhttps:/...

    2018 doi

  79. [90]

    J. M. Rodenburg, R. H. T. Bates, The the- ory of super-resolution electron microscopy via Wigner-distribution deconvolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences 339 (1655) (1992) 521–553.doi:10.1098/rsta.1992.0...

    1992

  80. [92]

    P. Li, T. B. Edo, J. M. Rodenburg, Pty- chographic inversion via Wigner distribution deconvolution: Noise suppression and probe design, Ultramicroscopy 147 (2014) 106–113. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.07.004. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2014.07.004

    2014 doi

  81. [93]

    Rodenburg, B

    J. Rodenburg, B. McCallum, P. Nellist, Experi- mental tests on double-resolution coherent imaging via STEM, Ultramicroscopy 48 (3) (1993) 304–314. doi:10.1016/0304-3991(93)90105-7. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/0304399193901057

    1993

  82. [94]

    T. J. Pennycook, A. R. Lupini, H. Yang, M. F. Murfitt, L. Jones, P. D. Nellist, Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detec- tor. Part 1: Experimental demonstration at atomic resolution, Ultramicroscopy 151 (0) (2015) 160–167. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.0...

    2015 doi

  83. [95]

    H. Yang, T. J. Pennycook, P. D. Nellist, Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detector. Part II: Optimisation of imaging con- ditions, Ultramicroscopy 151 (0) (2015) 232–239. 21 doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.013. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ ...

    2015 doi

  84. [96]

    H. Yang, P. Ercius, P. D. Nellist, C. Ophus, Enhanced phase contrast transfer using pty- chography combined with a pre-specimen phase plate in a scanning transmission electron mi- croscope, Ultramicroscopy 171 (2016) 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.09.002. URLhttp://dx.do...

    2016 doi

  85. [97]

    H. Guo, E. Franken, Y. Deng, S. Benlekbir, G. Singla Lezcano, B. Janssen, L. Yu, Z. A. Ripstein, Y. Z. Tan, J. L. Rubinstein, Electron- event representation data enable efficient cryoEM file storage with full preservation of spatial and temporal resolution, IUCrJ 7 (5) (2020) ...

    2020 doi

  86. [98]

    Datta, K

    A. Datta, K. F. Ng, D. Balakrishnan, M. Ding, S. W. Chee, Y. Ban, J. Shi, N. D. Loh, A data reduction and compression description for high throughput time-resolved electron microscopy, Nature Communications 12 (1) (2021) 664. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20694-z. URLhttp://dx.doi.or...

    2021 doi

  87. [99]

    P. M. Pelz, I. Johnson, C. Ophus, P. Ercius, M. C. Scott, Real-Time Interactive 4D-STEM Phase- Contrast Imaging From Electron Event Representa- tion Data: Less computation with the right repre- sentation, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 39 (1) (2022) 25–31.doi:10.1109/MSP.2021...

    2022

  88. [101]

    F.Hüe, J.M.Rodenburg, A.M.Maiden, F.Sweeney, P. A. Midgley, Wave-front phase retrieval in trans- mission electron microscopy via ptychography, Phys- ical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materi- als Physics 82 (12) (2010) 1–4.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.82.121415

    2010

  89. [102]

    J. Song, C. S. Allen, S. Gao, C. Huang, H. Sawada, X. Pan, J. Warner, P. Wang, A. I. Kirkland, Atomic Resolution Defocused Electron Ptychog- raphy at Low Dose with a Fast, Direct Electron Detector, Scientific Reports 9 (1) (2019) 3919. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40413-z. URLhttp:/...

    2019 doi

  90. [103]

    J. A. Mir, R. Clough, R. MacInnes, C. Gough, R. Plackett, I. Shipsey, H. Sawada, I. Ma- cLaren, R. Ballabriga, D. Maneuski, V. O’Shea, D. McGrouther, A. I. Kirkland, Characterisa- tion of the Medipix3 detector for 60 and 80 keV electrons, Ultramicroscopy 182 (2017) 44–53. doi:...

    2017 doi

  91. [104]

    M. C. Cao, Y. Han, Z. Chen, Y. Jiang, K. X. Nguyen, E. Turgut, G. D. Fuchs, D. A. Muller, Theory and practice of electron diffraction from sin- gle atoms and extended objects using an EMPAD, Microscopy 67 (December 2017) (2018) i150–i161. doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfx123

    2017 doi

  92. [105]

    Aharonov, D

    Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Significance of Electromag- netic Potentials in the Quantum Theory, Phys. Rev. 115 (3) (1959) 485–491.doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 115.485

    1959 doi

  93. [106]

    J. N. Cederquist, C. C. Wackerman, Phase- retrieval error: a lower bound, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4 (9) (1987) 1788. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.001788. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm? URI=josaa-4-9-1788

    1987 doi

  94. [107]

    Luczka, M

    J. Luczka, M. Niemiec, A master equation for quan- tum systems driven by Poisson white noise, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24 (17) (1991) L1021–L1024.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/24/ 17/010. URLhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1088/0305-4470/24/17/010

    1991 doi

  95. [108]

    Drenth, A

    A. Drenth, A. Huiser, H. Ferwerda, The Prob- lem of Phase Retrieval in Light and Electron Microscopy of Strong Objects, Optica Acta: Inter- national Journal of Optics 22 (7) (1975) 615–628. doi:10.1080/713819083. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/ 713819083https://www.tandfonline.com...

    1975 doi

  96. [109]

    Godard, M

    P. Godard, M. Allain, V. Chamard, J. Rodenburg, Noise models for low counting rate coherent diffrac- tion imaging, Optics Express 20 (23) (2012) 25914. doi:10.1364/OE.20.025914. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm? URI=oe-20-23-25914

    2012 doi

  97. [110]

    A. J. D’Alfonso, L. J. Allen, H. Sawada, A. I. Kirkland, Dose-dependent high-resolution electron 22 ptychography, Journal of Applied Physics 119 (5) (2016) 0–5.doi:10.1063/1.4941269. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/ 1.4941269https://pubs.aip.org/ jap/article/119/5/054302/142480/ ...

    2016 doi

  98. [111]

    Madsen, T

    J. Madsen, T. Susi, The abTEM code: trans- mission electron microscopy from first prin- ciples, Open Research Europe 1 (2021) 24. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13015.2. URLhttps://open-research-europe.ec. europa.eu/articles/1-24/v2

    2021 doi

  99. [112]

    J. P. van Schayck, E. van Genderen, E. Maddox, L. Roussel, H. Boulanger, E. Fröjdh, J.-P. Abra- hams, P. J. Peters, R. B. Ravelli, Sub-pixel electron detection using a convolutional neural network, Ultramicroscopy 218 (February) (2020) 113091. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.11309...

    2020

  100. [113]

    T. Seki, Y. Ikuhara, N. Shibata, Theoret- ical framework of statistical noise in scan- ning transmission electron microscopy, Ul- tramicroscopy 193 (June) (2018) 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.06.014. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2018.06.014http://www.sciencedi...

    2018 doi

  101. [114]

    L. Bian, J. Suo, J. Chung, X. Ou, C. Yang, F. Chen, Q. Dai, Fourier ptychographic reconstruc- tion using Poisson maximum likelihood and trun- cated Wirtinger gradient, Scientific Reports 6 (June) (2016) 1–10.arXiv:1603.04746,doi:10.1038/ srep27384

    2016 arXiv

  102. [115]

    Seifert, Y

    J. Seifert, Y. Shao, R. van Dam, D. Bouchet, T. van Leeuwen, A. P. Mosk, Maximum-likelihood estima- tion in ptychography in the presence of Poisson- Gaussian noise statistics (2023) 1–11arXiv:2308. 02436,doi:10.1364/OL.502344. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02436http:// dx.doi.o...

    2023 arXiv

  103. [116]

    Fujiwara, Relativistic Dynamical Theory of Electron Diffraction, Journal of the Physi- cal Society of Japan 16 (11) (1961) 2226–2238

    K. Fujiwara, Relativistic Dynamical Theory of Electron Diffraction, Journal of the Physi- cal Society of Japan 16 (11) (1961) 2226–2238. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.16.2226. URLhttps://journals.jps.jp/doi/10.1143/ JPSJ.16.2226

    1961 doi

  104. [117]

    J. M. Cowley, I. Sumio, S. Iijima, Electron Micro- scope Image Contrast for Thin Crystal, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 27 (3) (1972) 445–451. doi:10.1515/zna-1972-0312. URLhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/ doi/10.1515/zna-1972-0312/htmlhttps: //www.degruyter.com/view/j/z...

    1972 doi

  105. [118]

    Z. Chen, E. Turgut, Y. Jiang, K. X. Nguyen, M. J. Stolt, S. Jin, D. C. Ralph, G. D. Fuchs, D. A. Muller, Lorentz electron ptychography for imaging magnetic textures beyond the diffraction limit, Na- tureNanotechnology17(11)(2022)1165–1170.doi: 10.1038/s41565-022-01224-y

    2022 doi

  106. [119]

    J. Cui, H. Sha, W. Yang, R. Yu, Antiferro- magnetic imaging via ptychographic phase retrieval, Science Bulletin (xxxx) (dec 2023). doi:10.1016/j.scib.2023.12.044. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023. 12.044https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S2095927323009167

    2023 doi

  107. [120]

    Robert, I

    H. Robert, I. Lobato, F. Lyu, Q. Chen, S. Van Aert, D. Van Dyck, K. Müller-Caspary, Dynamical diffraction of high-energy electrons investigated by focal series momentum-resolved scanning trans- mission electron microscopy at atomic resolution, Ultramicroscopy 233 (October 2021...

    2021

  108. [121]

    O. Bunk, M. Dierolf, S. Kynde, I. Johnson, O. Marti, F. Pfeiffer, Influence of the overlap parameter on the convergence of the ptychographical iterative engine, Ultramicroscopy 108 (5) (2008) 481–487. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.08.003. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retr...

    2008 doi

  109. [122]

    C. J. Humphreys, P. B. Hirsch, Absorption param- eters in electron diffraction theory, Philosophical Magazine 18 (151) (1968) 115–122.doi:10.1080/ 14786436808227313

    1968

  110. [123]

    Grieb, P

    A.Beyer, F.F.Krause, H.L.Robert, S.Firoozabadi, T. Grieb, P. Kükelhan, D. Heimes, M. Schowalter, K. Müller-Caspary, A. Rosenauer, K. Volz, Influ- ence of plasmon excitations on atomic-resolution quantitative 4D scanning transmission electron microscopy, Scientific Reports 10 (...

    2020 doi

  111. [124]

    Barthel, L

    J. Barthel, L. J. Allen, Role of ionization in imaging and spectroscopy utilizing fast electrons that have 23 excited phonons, Physical Review B 104 (10) (2021) 1–13.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.104108

    2021 doi

  112. [125]

    H. L. Robert, B. Diederichs, K. Müller-Caspary, Contribution of multiple plasmon scattering in low-angle electron diffraction investigated by energy-filtered atomically resolved 4D-STEM, Applied Physics Letters 121 (21) (2022) 213502. doi:10.1063/5.0129692. URLhttps://aip.scit...

    2022 doi

  113. [126]

    Van Dyck, Is the frozen phonon model adequate to describe inelastic phonon scattering?, Ultrami- croscopy 109 (6) (2009) 677–682.doi:10.1016/j

    D. Van Dyck, Is the frozen phonon model adequate to describe inelastic phonon scattering?, Ultrami- croscopy 109 (6) (2009) 677–682.doi:10.1016/j. ultramic.2009.01.001

    2009 doi

  114. [127]

    Van Dyck, Persistent misconceptions about incoherence in electron microscopy, Ultramicroscopy 111 (7) (2011) 894–900

    D. Van Dyck, Persistent misconceptions about incoherence in electron microscopy, Ultramicroscopy 111 (7) (2011) 894–900. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.007. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0304399111000222https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S03...

    2011 doi

  115. [128]

    R. S. Ruskin, Z. Yu, N. Grigorieff, Quanti- tative characterization of electron detectors for transmission electron microscopy, Journal of Structural Biology 184 (3) (2013) 385–393. doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.016. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2013. 10.016https://linkinghu...

    2013 doi

  116. [129]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Brad- bury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Kopf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B.Steiner, L.Fang, J.Bai, S.Chintala, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performan...

    2019

  117. [130]

    G. C. Capitani, P. Oleynikov, S. Hovmöller, M. Mellini, A practical method to detect and cor- rect for lens distortion in the TEM, Ultramicroscopy 106 (2) (2006) 66–74.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic. 2005.06.003

    2006 doi

  118. [131]

    Z. Li, J. Biskupek, U. Kaiser, H. Rose, Integrated Differential Phase Contrast (IDPC)-STEM Utilizing a Multi-Sector Detector for Imaging Thick Samples, Microscopy and Microanalysis 28 (3) (2022) 611– 621.doi:10.1017/S1431927622000289

    2022 doi

  119. [132]

    Grieb, F

    T. Grieb, F. F. Krause, T. Mehrtens, C. Mahr, B. Gerken, M. Schowalter, B. Freitag, A. Rose- nauer, GaN atomic electric fields from a segmented STEM detector: Experiment and simulation, Journal of Microscopy (January) (2024) 1–7. doi:10.1111/jmi.13276. URLhttps://onlinelibrary...

    2024 doi

  120. [133]

    Pöllath, F

    S. Pöllath, F. Schwarzhuber, J. Zweck, The differential phase contrast uncertainty relation: Connection between electron dose and field resolu- tion, Ultramicroscopy 228 (March) (2021) 113342. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113342. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2021.113342

    2021

  121. [134]

    Lorenzen, B

    T. Lorenzen, B. März, T. Xue, A. Beyer, K. Volz, T. Bein, K. Müller-Caspary, Imaging built-in elec- tric fields and light matter by Fourier-precession TEM, Scientific Reports 14 (1) (2024) 1320. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51423-x. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-024-51423-xhttp...

    2024 doi

  122. [135]

    J. M. Cowley, IMAGE CONTRAST IN A TRANS- MISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICRO- SCOPE, Applied Physics Letters 15 (2) (1969) 58–59.doi:10.1063/1.1652901. URLhttp://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/ 1.1652901

    1969 doi

  123. [136]

    F. F. Krause, A. Rosenauer, Reciprocity relations in transmission electron microscopy: A rigorous derivation, Micron 92 (Supplement C) (2017) 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2016.09.007. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0968432816301421

    2017 doi

  124. [137]

    J. Zhao, C. Huang, A. Mostaed, A. Moshtaghpour, J. M. Parkhurst, I. Lobato, M. Gallagher-Jones, J. S. Kim, M. Boyce, D. Stuart, E. A. Andreeva, J.-p. Colletier, A. I. Kirkland, Electron fourier ptychography for phase reconstruction, Scientific Reports 15 (1) (2025) 37955.arXiv...

    2025

  125. [138]

    Basavappa, D

    R. Basavappa, D. Filman, R. Syed, O. Flore, J. Icenogle, J. Hogle, Role and mechanism of the maturation cleavage of VP0 in poliovirus assembly: Structure of the empty capsid assembly intermediate at 2.9 Å resolution, Protein Science 3 (10) (1994) 24 1651–1669.doi:10.1002/pro.5...

    1994 doi

  126. [139]

    J. M. Cowley, A. F. Moodie, The scattering of elec- trons by atoms and crystals. I. A new theoretical approach, Acta Crystallographica 10 (10) (1957) 609–619.doi:10.1107/s0365110x57002194. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1107/ S0365110X57002194

    1957 doi

  127. [140]

    Goodman, A

    P. Goodman, A. F. Moodie, Numerical evaluations of N-beam wave functions in electron scattering by the multi-slice method, Acta Crystallographica Section A 30 (2) (1974) 280–290.doi:10.1107/ S056773947400057X

    1974

  128. [141]

    Ishizuka, N

    K. Ishizuka, N. Uyeda, A new theoretical and practical approach to the multislice method, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 33 (5) (1977) 740–749. doi:10.1107/S0567739477001879. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1107/ S0567739477001879

    1977 doi

  129. [142]

    E. J. Kirkland, Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33260-0. URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 978-3-030-33260-0

    2020 doi

  130. [143]

    Butan, D

    C. Butan, D. J. Filman, J. M. Hogle, Cryo-Electron Microscopy Reconstruction Shows Poliovirus 135S Particles Poised for Membrane Interaction and RNA Release, Journal of Virology 88 (3) (2014) 1758–1770.doi:10.1128/JVI.01949-13. URLhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/ JVI.01949-13

    2014 doi

  131. [144]

    Dimova, R

    N. Dimova, R. Plackett, D. Weatherill, D. Wood, L. O’Ryan, G. Crevatin, J. Barnard, M. Gallagher- Jones, D. Hynds, R. Goldsbrough, I. Shipsey, D. Bortoletto, A. Kirkland, Measurement of the resolution of the Timepix4 detector for 100 keV and 200 keV electrons for transmission ...

    2025 arXiv

  132. [145]

    S. Li, N. Gauquelin, H. L. Lalandec Robert, A. An- nys, C. Gao, C. Hofer, T. J. Pennycook, J. Verbeeck, Improving the low-dose performance of aberration correction in single sideband ptychography, Ultra- microscopy 277 (2025) 114225.arXiv:2505.09555, doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.202...

    2025

  133. [146]

    Thibault, M

    P. Thibault, M. Dierolf, O. Bunk, A. Menzel, F. Pfeiffer, Probe retrieval in ptychographic coherent diffractive imaging, Ultramicroscopy 109 (4) (2009) 338–343.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.12.011

    2009 doi

  134. [147]

    A. M. Maiden, J. M. Rodenburg, An improved pty- chographical phase retrieval algorithm for diffractive imaging, Ultramicroscopy 109 (10) (2009) 1256– 1262.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.05.012. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0304399109001284

    2009 doi

  135. [148]

    Thibault, A

    P. Thibault, A. Menzel, Reconstructing state mixtures from diffraction measurements, Na- ture 494 (7435) (2013) 68–71.doi:10.1038/ nature11806. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11806

    2013 doi

  136. [149]

    Z. Chen, M. Odstrcil, Y. Jiang, Y. Han, M. H. Chiu, L. J. Li, D. A. Muller, Mixed-state electron ptychography enables sub-angstrom resolution imaging with picometer precision at low dose, Nature Communications 11 (1) (2020) 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16688-6. URLhttp://dx.do...

    2020 doi

  137. [150]

    A. M. Maiden, M. J. Humphry, F. Zhang, J. M. Ro- denburg, Superresolution imaging via ptychography, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 28 (4) (2011) 604.doi:10.1364/josaa.28.000604

    2011 doi

  138. [151]

    Humphry, B

    M. Humphry, B. Kraus, A. Hurst, A. Maiden, J. Ro- denburg, Ptychographic electron microscopy using high-angle dark-field scattering for sub-nanometre resolution imaging, Nature Communications 3 (1) (2012) 730.doi:10.1038/ncomms1733. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms1733http...

    2012 doi

  139. [152]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Chen, Y. Han, P. Deb, H. Gao, S. Xie, P. Purohit, M. W. Tate, J. Park, S. M. Gruner, V. Elser, D. A. Muller, Electron ptychography of 2D materials to deep sub-ångström resolution (jul 2018).doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0298-5. URLhttp://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-0...

    2018 doi

  140. [153]

    A. M. Maiden, M. J. Humphry, J. M. Rodenburg, Ptychographic transmission microscopy in three dimensions using a multi-slice approach, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 29 (8) (2012) 1606.doi:10.1364/JOSAA.29.001606. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm? URI=josaa-2...

    2012 doi

  141. [154]

    S. Gao, P. Wang, F. Zhang, G. T. Martinez, P. D. Nellist, X. Pan, A. I. Kirkland, Electron ptychographic microscopy for three-dimensional imaging, Nature Communications 8 (1) (2017) 163. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00150-1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-017-00150-1http://dx.do...

    2017 doi

  142. [155]

    Sayre, Some implications of a theorem due to Shannon, Acta Crystallographica 5 (6) (1952) 843

    D. Sayre, Some implications of a theorem due to Shannon, Acta Crystallographica 5 (6) (1952) 843. doi:10.1107/S0365110X52002276. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1107/ S0365110X52002276

    1952 doi

  143. [156]

    Gerchberg, Super-resolution through Er- ror Energy Reduction, Optica Acta: Interna- tional Journal of Optics 21 (9) (1974) 709–720

    R. Gerchberg, Super-resolution through Er- ror Energy Reduction, Optica Acta: Interna- tional Journal of Optics 21 (9) (1974) 709–720. doi:10.1080/713818946. URLhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ 10.1080/713818946

    1974 doi

  144. [157]

    Close, Z

    R. Close, Z. Chen, N. Shibata, S. D. Findlay, To- wards quantitative, atomic-resolution reconstruction of the electrostatic potential via differential phase contrast using electrons, Ultramicroscopy 159 (2015) 124–137.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.09.002. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10...

    2015 doi

  145. [158]

    Addiego, W

    C. Addiego, W. Gao, X. Pan, Thickness and defocus dependence of inter-atomic electric fields measured by scanning diffraction, Ultra- microscopy 208 (September 2019) (2020) 112850. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112850. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2019.112850

    2019

  146. [159]

    Bürger, T

    J. Bürger, T. Riedl, J. K. Lindner, Influence of lens aberrations, specimen thickness and tilt on differential phase contrast STEM images, Ultramicroscopy 219 (February) (2020) 113118. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113118. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2020.113118

    2020

  147. [160]

    Liang, D

    Z. Liang, D. Song, B. Ge, Optimizing experi- mental parameters of integrated differential phase contrast (iDPC) for atomic resolution imaging, Ultramicroscopy 246 (June 2022) (2023) 113686. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113686. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic. 2023.113686

    2022

  148. [161]

    Clark, G

    L. Clark, G. T. Martinez, C. M. O’Leary, H. Yang, Z. Ding, T. C. Petersen, S. D. Findlay, P. D. Nellist, The Effect of Dynamical Scattering on Single-plane Phase Retrieval in Electron Ptychography, Mi- croscopy and Microanalysis 29 (1) (2023) 384–394. doi:10.1093/micmic/ozac02...

    2023 doi

  149. [162]

    C. Gao, C. Hofer, T. Pennycook, On cen- tral focusing for contrast optimization in direct electron ptychography of thick samples, Ultramicroscopy 256 (November

  150. [163]

    S. H. Shahmoradian, E. H. Tsai, A. Diaz, M. Guizar- Sicairos, J. Raabe, L. Spycher, M. Britschgi, A. Ruf, H. Stahlberg, M. Holler, Three-dimensional imaging of biological tissue by cryo x-ray pty- chography, Scientific Reports 7 (1) (2017) 1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05587-4....

    2017 doi

  151. [164]

    T. Wang, S. Jiang, P. Song, R. Wang, L. Yang, T. Zhang, G. Zheng, Optical ptychography for biomedical imaging: recent progress and future directions [Invited], Biomedical Optics Express 14 (2) (2023) 489.doi:10.1364/BOE.480685. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm? URI=boe-14-2-489

    2023 doi

  152. [165]

    Kunze, C

    S. Kunze, C. Nam, H. Kim, J. Chung, E. Hong, J. Song, H. Choi, J. Lim, X-ray imaging methods for multiscale characterization of batteries, Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society 46 (4) (2025) 360–380. doi:10.1002/bkcs.70009. URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/bkcs.70009

    2025 doi

  153. [166]

    K. Sun, H. Sha, J. Cui, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Y. Dong, R. Yu, The challenge of imaging electron-beam sensitive LiCoO2 cathode at atomic scale and a pty- chography solution, Journal of Energy Chemistry (jul 2025).doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2025.07.037. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem...

    2025 doi

  154. [167]

    Donnelly, V

    C. Donnelly, V. Scagnoli, M. Guizar-Sicairos, M. Holler, F. Wilhelm, F. Guillou, A. Rogalev, C. Detlefs, A. Menzel, J. Raabe, L. J. Heyderman, High-resolution hard x-ray magnetic imaging with dichroic ptychography, Physical Review B 94 (6) (2016) 064421.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94...

    2016 doi

  155. [168]

    H. KP, R. Xu, K. Patel, K. J. Crust, A. Khandelwal, C. Zhang, S. Prosandeev, H. Zhou, Y.-T. Shao, 26 L. Bellaiche, H. Y. Hwang, D. A. Muller, Electron ptychography reveals a ferroelectricity dominated by anion displacements, Nature Materials (apr 2025).doi:10.1038/s41563-025-0...

    2025 doi

  156. [169]

    T. A. Butcher, N. W. Phillips, C.-C. Wei, S.- C. Chang, I. Beinik, K. Thånell, J.-C. Yang, S.-W. Huang, J. Raabe, S. Finizio, Imaging fer- roelectric domains with soft-x-ray ptychography at the oxygen K-edge, Physical Review Applied 23 (1) (2025) L011002.arXiv:2408.09608, doi:...

    2025 arXiv

  157. [170]

    Black, E

    G. Black, E. H. Linfoot, Spherical aberration and the information content of optical images, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 239 (1219) (1957) 522–540.doi:10.1098/rspa.1957.0059. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/ do...

    1957

  158. [2023]

    URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08587https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0304399123001961

    (2024) 113879.arXiv:2306.08587, doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113879. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08587https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0304399123001961

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.