Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from $N_f = 2 + 1$ lattice QCD

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06590 v2 pith:QYNF7QZQ submitted 2023-09-12 hep-lat

classification hep-lat
keywords protonmagneticlatticeelectricelectromagneticfactorsformneutron
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

There is a long-standing discrepancy between different measurements of the electric and magnetic radii of the proton. Lattice QCD calculations are a well-suited tool for theoretical investigations of the structure of the nucleon from first principles. However, all previous lattice studies of the proton's electromagnetic radii have either neglected quark-disconnected contributions or were not extrapolated to the continuum and infinite-volume limit. Here, we present results for the electromagnetic form factors of the proton and neutron computed on the $(2 + 1)$-flavor Coordinated Lattice Simulations (CLS) ensembles including both quark-connected and -disconnected contributions. From simultaneous fits to the $Q^2$-, pion-mass, lattice-spacing, and finite-volume dependence of the form factors, we determine the electric and magnetic radii and the magnetic moments of the proton and neutron. For the proton, we obtain as our final values $\langle r_E^2 \rangle^p = (0.672 \pm 0.014$ (stat)${} \pm 0.018$ (syst)$)$ fm${}^2$, $\langle r_M^2 \rangle^p = (0.658 \pm 0.012$ (stat)${} \pm 0.008$ (syst)$)$ fm${}^2$, and $\mu_M^p = 2.739 \pm 0.063$ (stat)${} \pm 0.018$ (syst). The magnetic moment is in good agreement with the experimental value, as is the one of the neutron. On the one hand, our result for the electric (charge) radius of the proton clearly points towards a small value, as favored by muonic hydrogen spectroscopy and the recent $ep$-scattering experiment by PRad. Our estimate for the magnetic radius, on the other hand, is well compatible with that inferred from the A1 $ep$-scattering experiment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher-order hopping-parameter expansion by human-AI collaboration

    hep-lat 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Trie-structured algorithms compute κ^8 to κ^12 terms in the hopping expansion of Tr ln M at costs scaling from 20x to 8900x a staple, verified by direct comparison to a reference calculation.

  2. Proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD in the continuum limit

    hep-lat 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Nucleon electromagnetic radii and magnetic moments are extracted from lattice QCD in the continuum limit directly at the physical pion mass, with disconnected contributions included.

  3. Implications of exclusive photon leptoproduction measurements for the proton charge-radius puzzle

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    After excluding or cutting low-|t| CLAS 2018 data, BH-dominated EP measurements yield a proton charge radius smaller than the PDG average and consistent with PRad and muonic hydrogen.

Pith tools