Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 38 references

Scattering polarimetry enables correlative nerve fiber imaging and multimodal analysis

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces a single microscope that combines polarized-light and scattered-light fiber mapping and shows it matches separate state-of-the-art setups on real brain sections.

desk verdict A genuine first integration of 3D-PLI and ComSLI in one microscope, but the 'comparable results' claim currently rests on visual agreement after hand-tuned alignment rather than measured errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08499 v3 pith:QYVFO3OJ submitted 2024-12-11 physics.med-ph

Franca auf der Heiden , Markus Axer , Katrin Amunts , Miriam Menzel This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-ph
keywords scatteringpolarimetry3D-PLIComSLInervefibermappingmultimodalimagingMuellerpolarimeterbrainsectionscrossings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces the Scattering Polarimeter, a microscope that performs Three-Dimensional Polarized Light Imaging (3D-PLI) and Computational Scattered Light Imaging (ComSLI) on the same brain section in immediate succession, without moving the sample. 3D-PLI gives stable in-plane fiber directions and retardance from birefringence, while ComSLI uses oblique scattered light to resolve multiple crossing fiber directions per pixel. On a 60 µm vervet monkey section and a 50 µm human section, the authors report that the new device produces transmittance, retardation, and fiber direction maps comparable to those from a state-of-the-art 3D-PLI microscope and a dedicated ComSLI setup. They then fuse both modalities into a multimodal fiber direction map that shows up to three directions per pixel, combining 3D-PLI's stability with ComSLI's crossing detection. The value of the claim is that correlative, pixel-aligned multimodal mapping of dense nerve fiber architecture would no longer require two separate instruments or image registration.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Scattering Polarimeter itself: a Mueller polarimeter whose polarization state generator and analyzer use four liquid-crystal variable retarders and two fixed linear polarizers, with a large-area LED panel that supplies both vertical illumination (for 3D-PLI and Mueller polarimetry) and oblique illumination segments (for ComSLI). Because both measurements share one camera and one sample position, the resulting parameter maps are inherently pixel-aligned. The multimodal fiber direction map then carries the argument's final step: a hand-tuned classification of each pixel by expected fiber architecture decides whether 3D-PLI or ComSLI directions are more trustworthy, and up to three directions are displayed per pixel.

What would settle it

On the same section and pixel grid, compute the fiber direction angle with the Scattering Polarimeter and with a reference 3D-PLI setup, align the data using the paper's own procedure, and measure the median absolute angular difference in the corpus callosum; if the median exceeds a few degrees or varies systematically with brain region, the comparability claim fails. A complementary check would count false-positive crossing detections in regions known to contain only parallel fibers, where the multimodal map should not introduce extra directions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a modified Mueller polarimeter, built from two linear polarizers, four liquid-crystal variable retarders, and a large patternable LED panel, can act as both a 3D-PLI system and a ComSLI system, generating results equivalent to dedicated single-mode setups. Vertical illumination through the polarization state generator and analyzer yields the 3D-PLI sinusoidal signal, from which transmittance, retardation, and fiber direction are extracted; oblique illumination segments bypass the polarization generator so that the same camera records scattering profiles from which up to three fiber directions per pixel are derived. The authors show this on human and vervet monkey brain sections and go on to construct a multimodal fiber direction map: a pixel-classification routine identifies white matter, gray matter, and crossing regions, then selects for each pixel the most reliable direction from 3D-PLI or ComSLI, exhibiting an improved signal-to-noise ratio in gray matter and parallel-fiber regions while preserving crossing information. The authors present this as a proof of concept that scattering polarimetry can serve as a correlative, multimodal nerve fiber imaging method.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the new device matches state-of-the-art setups rests on visual agreement after manually rotating, transposing, offsetting, and contrast-matching the reference images, with no quantitative angular-difference statistics or pixel-wise error metrics reported to rule out systematic deviations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Combined 3D-PLI and ComSLI measurements on one section can be done with a single device, eliminating sample transfer and image registration steps.
  • The multimodal fiber direction map can display up to three fiber directions per pixel, retaining 3D-PLI's stability for parallel fibers and gray matter while adding ComSLI's crossing detection.
  • Regions where 3D-PLI and ComSLI directions disagree may flag changes in tissue optical properties, for instance myelin degeneration that alters birefringence but leaves scattering largely unchanged.
  • Because the hardware is a Mueller polarimeter, the same device can in principle also deliver full Mueller matrix parameters such as depolarization and diattenuation, adding tissue-classification contrasts without new hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a quantitative validation study reporting pixel-wise angular error against the reference setups would let other labs reproduce the comparability claim; the current report compares visually after manual alignment.
  • Beyond the paper: if the multimodal direction map proves reliable, it could serve as a micrometer-resolution ground truth for validating diffusion MRI tractography in post-mortem brains, especially for crossing-fiber regions.
  • Beyond the paper: the reported transmittance asymmetry in the older, more transparent vervet sample could be corrected by calibrating the LCVR retardance-voltage curves near their quarter-wave operating points, a direct, testable hardware fix implied by the paper's Mueller calculus.
  • Beyond the paper: comparing 3D-PLI and ComSLI directions per pixel could be developed into a label-free assay of myelin integrity, since loss of myelin changes birefringence without changing scattering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Scattering Polarimeter, a microscope that integrates 3D-PLI and angular ComSLI into a single device using a Mueller polarimeter architecture with LCVRs and a large-area LED panel. The authors perform 3D-PLI and ComSLI measurements on two brain sections (human and vervet) with different optical properties, compare the resulting transmittance, retardation, fiber direction, and scattering maps against state-of-the-art reference setups, and construct a multimodal fiber direction map that combines 3D-PLI directions with ComSLI crossing information. The paper also provides a Mueller-matrix-based error analysis and discusses technical limitations and future hardware improvements.

Significance. If the comparability claim holds, this is the first single-device demonstration of correlative polarized-light and scattered-light fiber mapping with pixelwise alignment, which would facilitate faster multimodal measurements, cross-validation, and combined analysis of fiber orientation and crossings. The authors are transparent about artifacts, noise, longer exposure times, and the prototype nature of the device. The supplementary material includes fitted sinusoidal curves with residuals, R² values for representative pixels, and a detailed Mueller calculus treatment of systematic errors from LCVR retardance offsets. The data are publicly deposited, which strengthens reproducibility. The main uncertainty is the strength of the evidence for the central 'comparable results' claim, which currently rests on qualitative visual comparison.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results, 3D-PLI and ComSLI] The central claim that the Scattering Polarimeter 'generates results comparable to state-of-the-art 3D-PLI and ComSLI setups' is not supported by quantitative agreement metrics. In the 3D-PLI comparison, the reference direction maps are aligned by flipping and/or transposing the data array and adding a global direction offset (Section 'Three-Dimensional Polarized Light Imaging', with the quoted description of the rotation procedure), and transmittance maps are contrast-matched by choosing visualization ranges. The ComSLI comparison is similarly qualitative, relying on visual side-by-side inspection and vector maps with kernels chosen to 'approximately match.' No angular difference histograms, mean/median absolute angular errors, or pixel-wise error maps are reported. Because the alignment procedure includes free parameters (flips, transposition, global offset, contrast range), systematic deviations between the Scattering Polarimeter and the references could be concealed or compensated by these manual choices. The authors should provide quantitative angular error statistics over defined tissue regions (e.g., white matter, gray matter, crossing regions) for both brain samples, and report the alignment parameters actually used. Without such metrics, the comparability claim is overstated for a proof-of-concept study.
  2. [Results, Multimodal fiber direction map] The multimodal fiber direction map depends on sample-specific classification thresholds that are reported explicitly but not subjected to any robustness or sensitivity analysis. In the subsection 'Pixel classification (crossing fibers)', the thresholds for inclined parallel fibers (peak prominence ≥0.3 for human, ≥1.0 for vervet) and steep parallel fibers (average scattering >1200 a.u. for human, >430 a.u. for vervet) differ by factors of 3 or more between the two samples. The classification also uses a retardation threshold of |sin(δ)| < 0.07 for gray matter and a background threshold of I≤20 a.u. on the average scattering map. Since these thresholds directly determine which pixels are assigned to 3D-PLI versus ComSLI directions in the multimodal map, and since they are hand-set per sample, the generality of the multimodal construction is unclear. A sensitivity analysis (varying each threshold over a plausible range and reporting the resulting changes in the multimodal map) or a principled threshold-selection procedure would strengthen the claim that the multimodal map is a reliable combination rather than a demonstration tuned to these two samples.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo in the Introduction: 'does not rely on the briefringence' should read 'birefringence.'
  2. [Results, ComSLI] The vector maps are displayed with different kernel sizes for the Scattering Polarimeter (20×20 pixels) and the reference setup (10×10 pixels). The authors state that this 'was chosen to approximately match' the maps, but the size difference makes visual comparison of vector density and noise levels difficult. A figure showing both at the same kernel size, or a quantitative description of how the kernels were matched, would improve clarity.
  3. [Supplementary 4] The Fourier fit quality is documented with R² values for only a few representative pixels (Supplementary Fig. 2). Since the comparability claim relies on the reliability of the 3D-PLI signal, it would be helpful to report the distribution of R² values over the imaged regions, or at least over a larger set of pixels in both white and gray matter, to demonstrate that the high fit quality is not limited to selected locations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured fiber parameters are derived from raw intensity series by standard Fourier and SLIX algorithms and are compared against independent reference setups; manual alignment and fusion thresholds affect evidence strength but do not reduce the claims to their inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity. 3D-PLI transmittance, retardation, and fiber direction are obtained pixelwise from a Fourier coefficient fit to the measured sinusoidal intensity series (Supplementary 2, Eqs. 13-16); ComSLI directions are obtained from peak positions in azimuthal intensity profiles using the published SLIX toolbox. No target quantity is fed back into the computation of these maps. The reference measurements come from independent state-of-the-art instruments (LMP3D and a dedicated ComSLI setup), not from the Scattering Polarimeter itself. The alignment operations described in the Results—flipping/transposing the reference array, adding a global direction offset, and choosing transmittance visualization ranges—are coordinate and display transformations needed to compare images acquired with different optical zero references and camera settings; they are not fitted parameters that manufacture the reported agreement, although they do mean the comparability claim rests on visual rather than quantitative evidence. The multimodal fiber direction map is explicitly an algorithmic fusion of the 3D-PLI and ComSLI outputs using sample-specific classification thresholds; it is presented as a proof-of-concept data product, not as a first-principles prediction, so the fact that it preferentially selects 3D-PLI directions for parallel fibers and ComSLI directions for crossings is a transparent design choice rather than a hidden equivalence. Self-citations (SLIX and earlier ComSLI work) are methodological references and are not used as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or as substitutes for the experimental comparison. The paper also acknowledges its limitations—proof-of-concept status, noise, long exposure times, and the need for future parameter studies—which further reduces the risk of an overreaching claim being forced by construction. In sum, no circular step can be quoted or exhibited from the paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an instrument demonstration, so the ledger is dominated by measurement settings and domain assumptions rather than fitted physical parameters. The hand-set classification thresholds enter only in the multimodal map; the core 3D-PLI and ComSLI direction maps are derived from intensity series with standard Fourier and peak analysis and compared with independent reference systems. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • gray matter retardation threshold = |sin delta| < 0.07
    Used in Pixel classification (white matter) to separate gray matter from white matter in the multimodal map; chosen by the authors, not derived from independent data.
  • background average intensity threshold = 20 a.u.
    ComSLI average map threshold to identify background pixels in Pixel classification (white matter).
  • inclined parallel fiber peak prominence threshold (human) = 0.3
    Criterion 2b for parallel fibers with inclination between 30 and 65 degrees in the human brain sample.
  • inclined parallel fiber peak prominence threshold (vervet) = 1.0
    Criterion 2b for parallel fibers with inclination between 30 and 65 degrees in the vervet brain sample.
  • steep parallel fiber average scattering threshold (human) = 1200 a.u.
    Criterion 2c for fibers with inclination >= 65 degrees in the human brain section.
  • steep parallel fiber average scattering threshold (vervet) = 430 a.u.
    Criterion 2c for fibers with inclination >= 65 degrees in the vervet brain section.
  • fiber inclination category boundaries = 30 degrees and 65 degrees
    Hand-set boundaries used to classify in-plane, inclined, and steep fibers; not justified by a model.
  • global 3D-PLI direction offset = not stated in text
    Applied to reference LMP3D direction maps so they agree with Scattering Polarimeter orientation; the offset is chosen to match, not independently determined.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Mueller calculus and Lu-Chipman decomposition correctly describe polarized light transport in brain tissue
    Used in Supplementary 1 and for error propagation in Supplementary 4; standard polarimetry formalism.
  • domain assumption Polarization effects are negligible in ComSLI, so leaving the PSA in the optical path does not alter the scattering signal
    Stated in the Introduction: 'Since polarization effects are negligible in ComSLI, the PSA elements remained in the optical path without affecting the measurement.' If false, ComSLI direction profiles could be biased.
  • domain assumption LCVR azimuthal angles are ideal; only retardance offsets cause systematic errors
    Supplementary 4: 'The main reason for assuming ideal angles lies in the hardware: azimuthal angles can be set with high precision...' The error analysis ignores azimuthal and spatial inhomogeneity errors.
  • domain assumption Depolarization and diattenuation of brain tissue do not affect the in-plane fiber directions retrieved by 3D-PLI
    Supplementary 4, Eq. (24) and preceding text: depolarization scales amplitude but not phase; diattenuation neglected based on prior work (ref. 26).
  • domain assumption Reference measurements (LMP3D and ComSLI setup) are valid ground truth for the comparison
    The comparability claim is established only against these reference systems without independent ground truth such as histology or a known fiber atlas.
  • standard math The Fourier coefficient fit is a valid estimator of the sinusoidal 3D-PLI signal
    Standard discrete Fourier analysis; used to derive transmittance, retardation, and fiber direction in Supplementary 2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering polarimetry enables correlative nerve fiber imaging and multimodal analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QYVFO3OJ

@misc{pith2026241208499,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering polarimetry enables correlative nerve fiber imaging and multimodal analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QYVFO3OJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08499}
}
read the original abstract

Mapping the intricate network of nerve fibers is crucial for understanding brain function. Three-Dimensional Polarized Light Imaging (3D-PLI) and Computational Scattered Light Imaging (ComSLI) map dense nerve fibers in brain sections with micrometer resolution using visible light. 3D-PLI reconstructs 3D-fiber orientations, while ComSLI disentangles multiple directions per pixel. So far, these imaging techniques have been realized in separate setups. A combination within a single device would facilitate faster measurements, pixelwise mapping, cross-validation of fiber orientations, and leverage the advantages of each technique while mitigating their limitations. Here, we introduce the Scattering Polarimeter, a microscope that facilitates correlative large-area scans by integrating 3D-PLI and ComSLI measurements into a single system. Based on a Mueller polarimeter, it incorporates variable retarders and a large-area light source for direct and oblique illumination, enabling combined 3D-PLI and ComSLI measurements. Applied to human and vervet monkey brain sections, the Scattering Polarimeter generates results comparable to state-of-the-art 3D-PLI and ComSLI setups and creates a multimodal fiber direction map, integrating the robust fiber orientations obtained from 3D-PLI with fiber crossings from ComSLI. Furthermore, we discuss applications of the Scattering Polarimeter for unprecedented correlative and multimodal brain imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08499 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scattering Polarimeter and brain tissue samples. (a) Setup of the Scattering Polarimeter. The device is realized as a (modified) Mueller polarimeter with two high-quality linear polarizers (LPs) and four voltage-controlled liquid crystal variable retarders (LCVRs) for the polarization state generator (PSG) and analyzer (PSA), and a large-area light source suitable for vertical and oblique illumination (indicated in … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 3D-PLI measurement and parameter maps. (a) The Scattering Polarimeter when performing 3D-PLI measurements. The sample is illuminated vertically while the polarization state generator (PSG) generates linear polarization in equidistant azimuthal angles ρ and the polarization state analyzer (PSA) operates as a left-handed circular analyzer. (b) Exemplary signal in 3D-PLI for one image pixel with horizontally oriented f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ComSLI measurement and parameter maps. (a) The Scattering Polarimeter when performing ComSLI measurements. The elements of the PSG are bypassed by the light when illuminating from various angles ρ. Only the vertically scattered light is measured. Even though polarization effects are minor in ComSLI, the elements of the PSA are set to a retardance of 0. (b) Exemplary signal in ComSLI for one image pixel with horizont… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Generation of the multimodal fiber direction map (shown exemplary for the corona radiate region of the vervet monkey brain section). (a) White matter classification. Pixels classified as white matter are shown in blue, pixels classified as gray matter in white. (b) Fib…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between single-mode and multimodal fiber direction maps for the vervet brain section. (a) Single-mode fiber direction maps obtained from a ComSLI measurement with the Scattering Polarimeter. Corona radiata (cr), corpus callosum (cc), cingulum (cg), fornix (f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S., Bahney, J

    von Bartheld, C. S., Bahney, J. & Herculano-Houzel, S. The search for true numbers of neurons and glial cells in the human brain: A review of 150 years of cell counting.J. Comp. Neurol.524, 3865–3895, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24040 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1002/cne.24040 2016

  2. [2]

    S.Clinical neuroanatomy(Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia [u.a.], 2010), 7

    Snell, R. S.Clinical neuroanatomy(Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia [u.a.], 2010), 7. ed. edn. Includes bibliographical references and index

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Yendiki, A.et al.Post mortem mapping of connectional anatomy for the validation of diffusion MRI.NeuroImage256, 119146, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119146 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Calabrese, E.et al.A diffusion tensor MRI atlas of the postmortem rhesus macaque brain.NeuroImage117, 408–416, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.072 (2015)

    doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.072 2015

  5. [5]

    & Toga, A

    Shi, Y . & Toga, A. W. Connectome imaging for mapping human brain pathways.Mol. Psychiatry22, 1230–1240, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.92 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/mp.2017.92 2017

  6. [6]

    H.et al.The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography.Nat

    Maier-Hein, K. H.et al.The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography.Nat. Commun. 8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x 2017

  7. [7]

    J., Smith, I., Parker, I

    Sanderson, M. J., Smith, I., Parker, I. & Bootman, M. D. Fluorescence microscopy.Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.2014, pdb.top071795, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top071795 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1101/pdb.top071795 2014

  8. [8]

    E., Grünewald, K., Boekema, E

    Franken, L. E., Grünewald, K., Boekema, E. J. & Stuart, M. C. A. A technical introduction to transmission electron microscopy for soft-matter: Imaging, possibilities, choices, and technical developments.Small16, DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1002/smll.201906198 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    & Margrie, T

    Osten, P. & Margrie, T. W. Mapping brain circuitry with a light microscope.Nat. Methods10, 515–523, DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2477 (2013). 10.Novikova, T.et al. Mueller Polarimetry of Brain Tissues, 205–229 (Springer International Publishing, 2022)

    2013 doi

  2. [11]

    Felger, L.et al.Robustness of the wide-field imaging Mueller polarimetry for brain tissue differentiation and white matter fiber tract identification in a surgery-like environment: an ex vivo study.Biomed. Opt. Express14, 2400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.486438 (2023)

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    NeuroImage54, 1091–1101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.075 (2011)

    Axer, M.et al.A novel approach to the human connectome: Ultra-high resolution mapping of fiber tracts in the brain. NeuroImage54, 1091–1101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.075 (2011)

    2011 doi

  4. [13]

    Neuroinformatics5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2011.00034 (2011)

    Axer, M.et al.High-resolution fiber tract reconstruction in the human brain by means of three-dimensional polarized light imaging.Front. Neuroinformatics5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2011.00034 (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Neuroanat.15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2021.767223 (2021)

    Menzel, M.et al.Scatterometry measurements with scattered light imaging enable new insights into the nerve fiber architecture of the brain.Front. Neuroanat.15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2021.767223 (2021)

    2021

  6. [15]

    Menzel, M.et al.Scattered light imaging: Resolving the substructure of nerve fiber crossings in whole brain sections with micrometer resolution.NeuroImage233, 117952, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117952 (2021)

    2021

  7. [16]

    & Chipman, R

    Lu, S.-Y . & Chipman, R. A. Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition.J. Opt. Soc. Am. A13, 1106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.13.001106 (1996)

    1996 doi

  8. [17]

    18.Friederici, A

    Georgiadis, M.et al.Micron-resolution fiber mapping in histology independent of sample preparation.bioRxivDOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.26.586745 (2024). 18.Friederici, A. D.Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache, 367–377 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003)

    2024 doi

  9. [19]

    & Menzel, M

    Reuter, J. & Menzel, M. SLIX: A Python package for fully automated evaluation of scattered light imaging measurements on brain tissue.J. Open Source Softw.5, 2675, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02675 (2020)

    2020 doi

  10. [20]

    P.et al.A web-based brain atlas of the vervet monkey, chlorocebus aethiops.NeuroImage54, 1872–1880, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.070 (2011)

    Woods, R. P.et al.A web-based brain atlas of the vervet monkey, chlorocebus aethiops.NeuroImage54, 1872–1880, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.070 (2011)

    2011 doi

  11. [21]

    N.et al.Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range.Phys

    Yaroslavsky, A. N.et al.Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range.Phys. Medicine Biol.47, 2059–2073, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/12/305 (2002)

    2002 doi

  12. [22]

    H., Halliday, G

    Wong, J. H., Halliday, G. M. & Kim, W. S. Exploring myelin dysfunction in multiple system atrophy.Exp. Neurobiol.23, 337–344, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2014.23.4.337 (2014). 16/28

    2014 doi

  13. [23]

    Imaging39, 4376–4382, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2020.3018439 (2020)

    Schucht, P.et al.Visualization of white matter fiber tracts of brain tissue sections with wide-field imaging Mueller polarimetry.IEEE Transactions on Med. Imaging39, 4376–4382, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2020.3018439 (2020)

    2020

  14. [24]

    Reports6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31034 (2016)

    Lee, M.et al.Label-free optical quantification of structural alterations in Alzheimer’s disease.Sci. Reports6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31034 (2016)

    2016 doi

  15. [25]

    In Goda, K

    auf der Heiden, F.et al.Compressed sensing for optimized illumination in high-speed computational scattered light imaging. In Goda, K. & Tsia, K. K. (eds.)High-Speed Biomedical Imaging and Spectroscopy IX, 8, DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1117/12.3000869 (SPIE, 2024)

    doi

  16. [26]

    Menzel, M.et al.Diattenuation of brain tissue and its impact on 3D polarized light imaging.Biomed. Opt. Express8, 3163, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.8.003163 (2017)

    2017 doi

  17. [27]

    & Michielsen, K

    Menzel, M., Axer, M., Amunts, K., De Raedt, H. & Michielsen, K. Diattenuation imaging reveals different brain tissue properties.Sci. Reports9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38506-w (2019)

    2019 doi

  18. [28]

    Pegg, D. E. The history and principles of cryopreservation.Semin. Reproductive Medicine20, 005–014, DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-23515 (2002)

    2002 doi

  19. [29]

    L., Roy, N

    Rosene, D. L., Roy, N. J. & Davis, B. J. A cryoprotection method that facilitates cutting frozen sections of whole monkey brains for histological and histochemical processing without freezing artifact.J. Histochem. & Cytochem.34, 1301–1315, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/34.10.3...

    1986 doi

  20. [30]

    & Miranbaygi, M

    Ghassemi, P. & Miranbaygi, M. H. Towards skin polarization characterization using polarimetric technique.J. Zhejiang Univ. SCIENCE B10, 602–608, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b0920068 (2009)

    2009 doi

  21. [31]

    & Drevillon, B

    Compain, E., Poirier, S. & Drevillon, B. General and self-consistent method for the calibration of polarization modulators, polarimeters, and Mueller-matrix ellipsometers.38, 3490–3502, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.38.003490 (1999)

    1999 doi

  22. [32]

    Express14, 190, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/opex.14.000190 (2006)

    Manhas, S.et al.Mueller matrix approach for determination of optical rotation in chiral turbid media in backscattering geometry.Opt. Express14, 190, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/opex.14.000190 (2006)

    2006 doi

  23. [33]

    Ghosh, N., Wood, M. F. G. & Vitkin, I. A. Mueller matrix decomposition for extraction of individual polarization parameters from complex turbid media exhibiting multiple scattering, optical activity, and linear birefringence.J. Biomed. Opt.13, 044036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1...

    2008 doi

  24. [34]

    H.Polarized light(CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2011), third edition edn

    Goldstein, D. H.Polarized light(CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2011), third edition edn. Includes bibliographical references and index

    2011

  25. [35]

    d., Sanchez-Brea, L

    Hoyo, J. d., Sanchez-Brea, L. M. & Gomez-Pedrero, J. A. High precision calibration method for a four-axis Mueller matrix polarimeter.Opt. Lasers Eng.132, 106112, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106112 (2020)

    2020

  26. [36]

    Bueno, J. M. Polarimetry using liquid-crystal variable retarders: theory and calibration.J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt.2, 216–222, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/2/3/308 (2000)

    2000 doi

  27. [37]

    S., Chung, J.-R., DeLaughter, A

    Baba, J. S., Chung, J.-R., DeLaughter, A. H., Cameron, B. D. & Coté, G. L. Development and calibration of an automated Mueller matrix polarization imaging system.J. Biomed. Opt.7, 341, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1486248 (2002)

    2002 doi

  28. [38]

    M., Lewis, J

    Glazer, A. M., Lewis, J. G. & Kaminsky, W. An automatic optical imaging system for birefringent media.Proc. Royal Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.452, 2751–2765, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1996.0145 (1996)

    1996

  29. [39]

    & Chen, Z

    Zhang, J., Guo, S., Jung, W., Nelson, J. & Chen, Z. Determination of birefringence and absolute optic axis orientation using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography with pm fibers.Opt. Express11, 3262, DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1364/oe.11.003262 (2003)

    2003

  30. [40]

    Human Brain Project

    Gros, R.et al.Effects of formalin fixation on polarimetric properties of brain tissue: fresh or fixed?Neurophotonics10, 025009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.025009 (2023). Acknowledgements We thank Markus Cremer and the laboratory team at Forschungzentrum Jülich (IN...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.