Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 109 references

The Galaxy Activity, Torus, and Outflow Survey (GATOS). VII. The 20-214 $\mu$m imaging atlas of active galactic nuclei using SOFIA

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nearby active galaxies emit most of their nuclear dust light near 40 microns, and the more luminous the nucleus, the shorter its spectral peak.

desk verdict Solid SOFIA/Herschel atlas of 22 nearby AGN; treat the ~40 um peak and luminosity correlation as suggestive, not measured to that precision. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18738 v1 pith:QZPWFD6U submitted 2024-11-27 astro-ph.GA

Lindsay Fuller , Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez , Ismael Garcia-Bernete , Cristina Ramos Almeida , Almudena Alonso-Herrero , Chris Packham , Lulu Zhang , Mason Leist
show 19 more authors
Nancy Levenson Masa Imanishi Sebastian Hoenig Marko Stalevski Claudio Ricci Erin Hicks Enrica Bellocchi Francoise Combes Ric Davies Santiago Garcia Burillo Omaira GonzalezMartin TakumaIzumi Alvaro Labiano Miguel Pereira Santaella Dimitra Rigopoulou David Rosario Daniel Rouan Taro Shimizu Martin Ward
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnucleiinfraredimagingatlasSOFIAobservationsdusttorusspectralenergydistributionSeyfertgalaxieshostgalaxysubtraction40micronpeak
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper assembles the best-sampled 20–214 $\mu$m imaging dataset of nearby active galactic nuclei to date: 69 SOFIA images of 22 Seyferts, 41 of them previously unpublished. By separating each nucleus from its host galaxy, it builds arcsecond-scale spectral energy distributions from 30 to 500 $\mu$m and asks where AGN-heated dust actually radiates. The central result is that the average nuclear SED peaks near 40 $\mu$m in $\nu F_\nu$, the energy-per-logarithmic-frequency measure, implying dust at roughly 70–100 K in an unresolved extended region rather than only in the classical hot torus. The paper also reports that peak wavelength shortens as bolometric luminosity rises, and that the edge-on Seyfert NGC 4388 changes from narrow-line-region-aligned dust at 30–40 $\mu$m to host-galaxy-aligned dust at longer wavelengths.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by the atlas itself: 69 SOFIA/FORCAST (19.7–40 $\mu$m) and HAWC+ (53–214 $\mu$m) images of 22 AGN, complemented by Herschel 70–500 $\mu$m images and Spitzer/IRS spectra. The load-bearing tool is the flux extraction: point-like sources are measured with aperture photometry, while extended sources are fit with a two-component model in which the unresolved nucleus is a scaled standard-star point-spread function and the host galaxy is a single elongated 2D Gaussian plus a constant background, with 11 free parameters. This same model is applied to the Herschel images, producing the nuclear flux tables from which the SEDs, peak wavelengths, luminosities, and colors are all derived. PSF-subtracted residual images are what reveal extended AGN-heated structures such as the NLR dust in NGC 4388.

What would settle it

Re-analyze the same images with a host model that includes a stellar bar and a circumnuclear ring; if the average $\nu F_\nu$ peak moves away from ~40 $\mu$m or the luminosity–peak correlation disappears, the central result is an artifact of the Gaussian decomposition. A direct observational test is JWST/MIRI imaging at 20–28 $\mu$m of NGC 1068 and NGC 4388, which would resolve out the extended NLR dust and reveal whether the compact nucleus truly peaks near 40 $\mu$m.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery claim is that the several-arcsecond nuclear emission of nearby Seyferts, measured homogeneously from 20 to 500 $\mu$m, peaks on average at ~40 $\mu$m in $\nu F_\nu$. This peak lies longward of the 10–30 $\mu$m region where torus emission is usually characterized, and the authors attribute it to an unresolved extended dusty region heated by the AGN, with characteristic dust temperatures of 70–100 K. A secondary claim is that the peak wavelength anti-correlates with bolometric luminosity ($|R| \sim 0.63$, $p = 0.0015$), so more luminous AGN show hotter dust dominating their infrared output. The atlas also demonstrates a clean separation in NGC 4388 between narrow-line-region dust at 30–40 $\mu$m and host-galaxy dust at longer wavelengths.

Load-bearing premise

The extracted nuclear fluxes and the ~40 $\mu$m peak rest on the assumption that every unresolved nucleus is a scaled point-spread function sitting on a single smooth elliptical host component, so any real host structure (bars, rings, dust lanes) that the Gaussian cannot represent will bias the measured SED peak and the luminosity correlation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The average ~40 $\mu$m peak implies that models of AGN dust must reproduce a substantial far-infrared bump longward of the classical 10–30 $\mu$m torus bands, meaning a significant fraction of the dust-reprocessed energy escapes in the 30–60 $\mu$m range.
  • The luminosity–peak anti-correlation makes infrared color a rough luminosity diagnostic: brighter AGN will be identified by shorter-wavelength peaks and hotter dust.
  • The NGC 4388 morphology switch shows that wavelength-dependent imaging can separate AGN-heated narrow-line-region dust from star-forming host dust without spectroscopy, which can sharpen color-based AGN selection.
  • The elevated average $F_\nu(70)/F_\nu(160)$ ratio of 1.4 ± 0.7, compared with ~0.8 for larger star-formation-dominated samples, suggests far-infrared colors can pick out AGN-heated dust.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 40 $\mu$m peak is generic across the AGN population, surveys that use single 20–30 $\mu$m bands (such as WISE 22 $\mu$m) may undercount the bolometric dust output of Seyferts; comparing WISE W4 fluxes against the 40 $\mu$m peaks in this atlas would test that directly.
  • The unresolved extended dusty region may be the pc-scale dusty wind or NLR dust seen in interferometry; a test would be to compare the ~40 $\mu$m peak with subarcsecond interferometric sizes from instruments such as MATISSE to see whether the emitting region matches the dust sublimation radius or the NLR base.
  • The 2D Gaussian decomposition could be stress-tested on simulated images containing bars and rings; a re-analysis with a multi-component host model would either confirm or shift the reported nuclear fluxes and peak wavelengths.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a SOFIA/FORCAST and HAWC+ imaging atlas of 22 nearby Seyfert AGN at 19.7–214 μm, supplemented by archival Herschel 70–500 μm data. The authors provide photometry and images for 69 observations, 41 of them previously unpublished, and classify most sources as point-like while identifying four extended systems (Centaurus A, Circinus, NGC 1068, NGC 4388). Resolved nuclear fluxes are obtained either by aperture photometry or by a PSF-plus-single-2D-Gaussian decomposition for extended emission. The paper constructs the resulting mid- to far-IR SEDs, reports that the average peak wavelength in νFν is about 40 μm, associates this with unresolved AGN-heated dusty emission, and claims a correlation between bolometric luminosity and peak wavelength. It also presents a mid- to far-IR color-color diagram and discusses AGN versus star-formation dominated sources.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the atlas is a valuable legacy dataset for studying the mid- to far-IR properties of local AGN, because it provides homogeneous SOFIA imaging across a wide wavelength range and the best-sampled 30–500 μm SEDs available for this sample. The paper's strengths are its careful documentation of the reductions, the explicit treatment of calibration and background uncertainties, and the public release of 41 new images. The conclusion that the typical νFν peak is near 40 μm is physically relevant for torus and dusty-outflow models, as it points to dust at roughly 70–100 K, and the color analysis provides a useful comparison with larger samples. However, the quantitative peak-wavelength claim is not yet supported to the precision implied by the abstract, because the peak positions are selected from a sparse wavelength grid and are sensitive to the host-subtraction assumptions. The atlas value alone supports publication after the central SED claims are either strengthened with an uncertainty analysis or softened.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1 and Figure 14] The extraction of unresolved nuclear fluxes for the four extended sources relies on an 11-parameter model in which the host is a single elongated 2D Gaussian plus a constant background, with the unresolved nucleus represented by the standard-star PSF. For Centaurus A, Circinus, NGC 1068, and NGC 4388, known host structures such as dust lanes, bars, and circumnuclear rings are not representable by one Gaussian, so the fitted PSF amplitude can be biased in either direction depending on whether the host is over- or under-subtracted. Because the SED peaks and the L_bol–λ_peak correlation in Sections 5 and 5.1 depend on these fluxes, please add a robustness test that varies the host model (for example, a two-Gaussian host or a PSF-amplitude perturbation on the 31.5–53 μm images) and quantify the resulting shift in the nuclear fluxes and in λ_peak.
  2. [§5 and Figure 7] The peak wavelength is determined from a coarse and non-uniform grid consisting of the Spitzer/IRS spectrum plus photometry at 31.5, 37.1, 53, 70, 89, and longer wavelengths. For most objects the maximum in νFν falls either on the last covered Spitzer wavelength or on one of the SOFIA/Herschel band centers, so the abstract's statement that the 'average peak wavelength' is about 40 μm is substantially a statement about the chosen wavelength grid rather than about a measured continuum peak. No per-object uncertainties on λ_peak are reported. Please report λ_peak with uncertainties, for example by bootstrap-perturbing the measured fluxes within the quoted errors and recomputing the peak, or by fitting a smooth interpolation to the νFν points; also state how the sample average changes if the 31.5 μm or the 37.1 μm point is dropped for objects where the peak falls on that point.
  3. [§5 and §4.2, NGC 4388] For NGC 4388, the SED points at 31.5 and 37.1 μm are total aperture fluxes, not PSF-subtracted nuclear fluxes, because the text states that almost all of the extended emission lies within the FWHM and that total fluxes are therefore used for the SED in the 30–40 μm range. These points include NLR dust and possibly host-galaxy emission and are not directly comparable with the PSF-extracted nuclear fluxes at longer wavelengths. Since this object contributes a short-wavelength peak to the sample average, the peak and the average should be re-evaluated using either aperture-matched measurements at all wavelengths or an explicit correction for the known NLR/host contribution.
  4. [§5.1 and Figure 8] The claimed correlation between L_bol and λ_peak (|R|≈0.63, p=0.0015) is presented without error bars on λ_peak, without stating whether R is a Pearson or Spearman coefficient, and without testing how the discrete sampling of λ_peak affects the result. With 22 objects and λ_peak taking only a few discrete values (for example 18–20, 31.5, 37.1, 53, or 70 μm), the significance may be inflated by the grid rather than by a physical trend. Please add a Monte Carlo test that perturbs fluxes within their uncertainties, recomputes λ_peak and the correlation each time, and report the resulting distribution of R and p; also provide a version of Figure 8 with horizontal error bars on λ_peak.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1] The word 'organzed' in the paragraph beginning 'The manuscript is organzed as follows' is a typo and should read 'organized'.
  2. [Table 3] The row for NGC 4388 at 31.5 μm appears to list 'HA F545' as the mission/program identifier even though the observation was made with FORCAST; this is likely a typo and should be corrected to the appropriate FORCAST mission identifier.
  3. [§5.2] The text states 'Half (11) of the objects in the sample show ratios Fν(31)/Fν(70) < 1 while Fν(70)/Fν(160) > 1' and then lists 12 object names (Circinus, Mrk 231, Mrk 573, NGC 1275, NGC 2110, NGC 3081, NGC 3227, NGC 3281, NGC 4151, NGC 4941, NGC 5506, NGC 7469); the count or the list should be corrected.
  4. [§5, Figure 7] The text mentions that the Spitzer spectrum for NGC 1068 does not align with the SOFIA photometry because of PSF subtraction, but the same issue may affect other objects where Spitzer spectra are simply overplotted on photometry obtained with different apertures; a brief statement about the matching or non-matching of apertures for all objects would help readers interpret the SED peaks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported peak wavelengths and the ~40 μm average are measured quantities from atlas photometry and archival spectra, not outputs of a model fitted to those same quantities.

full rationale

The paper is an observational atlas; its central claims are measurements rather than predictions from a model fitted to the same data. Nuclear fluxes are extracted by aperture photometry for point sources and by a two-component PSF + 2D Gaussian fit for the four extended sources (Section 4.1). The SED peak wavelengths are then read off the resulting SEDs: 'The peak wavelength, determined by the highest flux from photometry and spectroscopy, ranges from 18 to 100 μm in νFν with an average of ~40 μm' (Section 5). No parameter is fitted to the peak and then re-derived from it; the average is an arithmetic summary of the measured peaks. Prior GATOS/SOFIA papers (Fuller et al. 2016, 2019; Lopez-Rodriguez et al. 2018) are used as data and calibration references, not as the authority establishing the central claim. The abstract's phrase 'which we associate with an unresolved extended dusty region heated by the AGN' is explicitly an association, and Section 1 disclaims the full disentangling of emitting components ('we expect to disentangle the emission sources in a future study'). The NGC 4388 limitation ('only use the results in wavelengths ≳ 40 μm' and use total 30-40 μm fluxes that encompass the NLR extension) is a data-reduction caveat that could bias individual peaks, but it does not make the derivation circular. Sparse wavelength sampling between 31.5 and 53 μm and the absence of reported uncertainties on λ_peak are accuracy and robustness concerns, not logical circularity. No circular step can be quoted, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The analysis relies on standard astronomy practice: empirical PSF characterization, a simplified host-galaxy model, literature distances and luminosities, and the assumption that mid-IR SED peaks are dominated by AGN-heated dust. The free parameters are measurement-model degrees of freedom, not physical constants.

free parameters (4)
  • PSF position and amplitude (4 fit parameters per image) = per image
    In the 2D Gaussian fitting (Section 4.1), the scaled PSF representing the unresolved nucleus is fit to each image; the resulting nuclear flux depends on this fit.
  • Host galaxy 2D Gaussian parameters (7 fit parameters: x0, y0, sigma_x, sigma_y, amplitude, theta, constant background) = per image
    The host galaxy/background model is fit simultaneously with the PSF (Section 4.1). This decomposition affects all fluxes for the four extended sources (Cen A, Circinus, NGC 1068, NGC 4388).
  • Aperture radius = 2 x FWHM
    Aperture photometry for point sources uses an aperture set to twice the FWHM at each band (Section 4); this choice affects total fluxes, though it is a standard convention.
  • Herschel PSF model choice = one of three PSF models compared
    Section 4.1: for Herschel images, the central-source fit compares two archival PSFs and a Gaussian approximation; the selected model affects the extracted fluxes.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard-star PSFs accurately represent the on-sky SOFIA PSF for each observation
    Section 2.2 defines PSFs from standard stars; Section 4 assumes these PSFs apply to the galaxy images despite possible time or airmass variations.
  • domain assumption The host galaxy contribution can be approximated by a single 2D Gaussian with constant background
    Section 4.1 assumes this model for extended sources; complex morphologies (bars, rings, clumpy star formation) could bias the unresolved flux.
  • domain assumption The SED peak in nuFnu traces the dominant AGN-heated dust component
    Section 5 interprets the average peak of ~40 μm as an unresolved extended dusty region heated by the AGN, but star formation contamination is not modeled at these wavelengths.
  • domain assumption Literature bolometric luminosities are accurate and uniformly defined
    Table 1 lists Lbol from different references using different methods; the luminosity-peak correlation (Section 5.1) uses these values as given.
  • domain assumption Spitzer/IRS spectra can be combined with SOFIA photometry to define the SED peak despite differing spatial scales
    Section 5 uses Spitzer spectra for 21 objects to locate the peak; the NGC 1068 discussion notes a mismatch, so the same caveat may apply to other objects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Galaxy Activity, Torus, and Outflow Survey (GATOS). VII. The 20-214 $\mu$m imaging atlas of active galactic nuclei using SOFIA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QZPWFD6U

@misc{pith2026241118738,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Galaxy Activity, Torus, and Outflow Survey (GATOS). VII. The 20-214 $\mu$m imaging atlas of active galactic nuclei using SOFIA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QZPWFD6U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18738}
}
abstract

We present a 19.7 - 214 $\mu$m imaging atlas of local (4 - 181 Mpc; median 43 Mpc) active galactic nuclei (AGN) observed with FORCAST and HAWC+ on board the SOFIA telescope with angular resolutions ~ 3"- 20". This atlas comprises 22 Seyferts (17 Type 2 and 5 Type 1) with a total of 69 images, 41 of which have not been previously published. The AGN span a range of luminosities of log$_{10}$ ($L_{bol}$ [erg/s]) = [42, 46] with a median of log$_{10}$ ($L_{bol}$ [erg/s]) = 44.1 $\pm$ 1.0. We provide total fluxes of our sample using aperture photometry for point source objects and a 2-D Gaussian fitting for objects with extended host galaxy emission, which was used to estimate the unresolved nuclear component. Most galaxies in our sample are point-like sources, however, four sources (Centaurus A, Circinus, NGC 1068, and NGC 4388) show extended emission in all wavelengths. The 30 - 40 $\mu$m extended emission in NGC 4388 is coincident with the narrow line region at PA ~ 50$^{\circ}$, while the dusty extension at longer wavelengths arises from the host galaxy at PA ~ 90$^{\circ}$. Our new observations allow us to construct the best sampled spectral energy distributions (SEDs) available between 30 - 500 $\mu$m for a sample of nearby AGN. We estimate that the average peak wavelength of the nuclear SEDs is ~ 40 $\mu$m in $\nu$F$_{\nu}$ , which we associate with an unresolved extended dusty region heated by the AGN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18738 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Luminosity plotted against distance of the 22 AGN in the atlas. Red triangles represent Sy1 and purple stars represent Sy2. cycles were to refine the spectroscopic mode of FORCAST with little or no change to the image mode presented here. Observations were flux-calibrated using the set of standard stars of the observing run, which provides flux uncertainties of ∼10 %. The point spread function (PSF) of the 31.5 𝜇m o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FORCAST 31.5, and 37.1 𝜇m images, and HAWC+ 53, 89, 155, and 215 𝜇m images. Each image has a differing FOV, which can be found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FORCAST 31.5 and 37.1 𝜇m images, and HAWC+ 53, 89, 155, and 215 𝜇m images. Note that the wavelength range for NGC 1068 starts 19.7 𝜇m, so its range is shifted. Each image has a differing FOV, which can be found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FORCAST 31.5 and 37.1 𝜇m images, and HAWC+ 53, 89, 155, and 215 𝜇m images. Each image has a differing FOV, which can be found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FORCAST 31.5 and 37.1 𝜇m images, and HAWC+ 53, 89, 155, and 215 𝜇m images. Each image has a differing FOV, which can be found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mid- to far-IR SEDs of the several-arcsecond-scale nuclear fluxes in our sample of AGN. Pink diamonds represent SOFIA observations while black dots represent complementary Herschel observations. The solid black lines correspond to Spitzer spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Color diagram of 21 of the 22 AGN in our sample. Sy 1 are represented by triangles while Sy 2 are stars. The scale on the right shows peak wavelength by color. Asmus, D. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 2177, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2289 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Herschel PACS and SPIRE FIR images. The white circle in the top right indicates the beam size of the observation, while the pink line in the bottom left indicates a distance of 1 kpc. APPENDIX A. HERSCHEL IMAGES We used images from the Herschel Archive to supplement S…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Herschel PACS and SPIRE FIR images. The white circle in the top right indicates the beam size of the observation, while the pink line in the bottom left indicates a distance of 1 kpc. B. BACKGROUND FITTING [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Herschel PACS and SPIRE FIR images. The white circle in the top right indicates the beam size of the observation, while the pink line in the bottom left indicates a distance of 1 kpc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Herschel PACS and SPIRE FIR images. The white circle in the top right indicates the beam size of the observation, while the pink line in the bottom left indicates a distance of 1 kpc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Example of the 2D gaussian fitting routine explained in Section 4.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: PSF-subtracted host galaxy images from archive Herschel data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2019

  2. [2]

    2011, , 736, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/82

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Ramos Almeida , C., Mason , R., et al. 2011, , 736, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/82

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/82 2011

  3. [3]

    2014, , 443, 2766, 10.1093/mnras/stu1293

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Ramos Almeida , C., Esquej , P., et al. 2014, , 443, 2766, 10.1093/mnras/stu1293

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1293 2014

  4. [4]

    F., et al

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Esquej , P., Roche , P. F., et al. 2016, , 455, 563, 10.1093/mnras/stv2342

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2342 2016

  5. [5]

    2018, , 859, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe30

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Pereira-Santaella , M., Garc \' a-Burillo , S., et al. 2018, , 859, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe30

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabe30 2018

  6. [6]

    F., et al

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Garc \' a-Burillo , S., H \"o nig , S. F., et al. 2021, , 652, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141219

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141219 2021

  7. [7]

    1993, , 31, 473, 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

    Antonucci , R. 1993, , 31, 473, 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

    arXiv 1993

  8. [8]

    Antonucci , R. R. J., & Miller , J. S. 1985, , 297, 621, 10.1086/163559

    doi:10.1086/163559 1985

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    2019, , 489, 2177, 10.1093/mnras/stz2289

    Asmus , D. 2019, , 489, 2177, 10.1093/mnras/stz2289

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    F., & Duschl , W

    Asmus , D., Gandhi , P., Smette , A., H \"o nig , S. F., & Duschl , W. J. 2011, , 536, A36, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116693

    2011 doi

  3. [11]

    2013, Sasmirala Subarcsecond mid-infrared atlas of local AGN , VO resource provided by the GAVO Data Center

    Asmus, D., Hoenig, S., Gandhi, P., Smette, A., & Duschl, W. 2013, Sasmirala Subarcsecond mid-infrared atlas of local AGN , VO resource provided by the GAVO Data Center. http://dc.zah.uni-heidelberg.de/sasmirala/q/im/info

    2013

  4. [12]

    F., & Gandhi , P

    Asmus , D., H \"o nig , S. F., & Gandhi , P. 2016, , 822, 109, 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/109

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    F., Gandhi , P., Smette , A., & Duschl , W

    Asmus , D., H \"o nig , S. F., Gandhi , P., Smette , A., & Duschl , W. J. 2014, , 439, 1648, 10.1093/mnras/stu041

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, apj, 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    H., Tueller , J., Markwardt , C

    Baumgartner , W. H., Tueller , J., Markwardt , C. B., et al. 2013, , 207, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/19

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Neugebauer , G., Matthews , K., et al

    Bock , J. J., Neugebauer , G., Matthews , K., et al. 2000, , 120, 2904, 10.1086/316871

    2000 doi

  11. [19]

    P., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., et al

    Borkar , A., Adhikari , T. P., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., et al. 2021, , 500, 3536, 10.1093/mnras/staa3515

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Burtscher , L., Meisenheimer , K., Tristram , K. R. W., et al. 2013, , 558, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321890

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    1990, , 351, 62, 10.1086/168444

    Buta , R. 1990, , 351, 62, 10.1086/168444

    1990 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Cobb , M

    Buta , R., Alpert , A. J., Cobb , M. L., Crocker , D. A., & Purcell , G. B. 1998, , 116, 1142, 10.1086/300494

    1998 doi

  15. [23]

    J., Byrd , G

    Buta , R. J., Byrd , G. G., & Freeman , T. 2004, , 127, 1982, 10.1086/382239

    2004 doi

  16. [24]

    1995, , 448, 600, 10.1086/175989

    Capetti , A., Macchetto , F., Axon , D., Sparks , W., & Boksenberg , A. 1995, , 448, 600, 10.1086/175989

    1995 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Gallagher , John S., I., & Wyse , R

    Conselice , C. J., Gallagher , John S., I., & Wyse , R. F. G. 2001, , 122, 2281, 10.1086/323534

    2001 doi

  18. [26]

    I., Thomas , J., Genzel , R., et al

    Davies , R. I., Thomas , J., Genzel , R., et al. 2006, , 646, 754, 10.1086/504963

    2006 doi

  19. [27]

    2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras , F., Bongiorno , A., Ricci , F., et al. 2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    T., Blandford , R

    Emmering , R. T., Blandford , R. D., & Shlosman , I. 1992, , 385, 460, 10.1086/170955

    1992 doi

  21. [29]

    C., Johnstone , R

    Fabian , A. C., Johnstone , R. M., Sanders , J. S., et al. 2008, , 454, 968, 10.1038/nature07169

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    S., & Mulchaey , J

    Ferruit , P., Wilson , A. S., & Mulchaey , J. 2000, , 128, 139, 10.1086/313379

    2000 doi

  23. [31]

    2016, , 462, 2618, 10.1093/mnras/stw1780

    Fuller , L., Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Packham , C., et al. 2016, , 462, 2618, 10.1093/mnras/stw1780

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    2019, , 483, 3404, 10.1093/mnras/sty3338

    ---. 2019, , 483, 3404, 10.1093/mnras/sty3338

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    W., Jaffe , W., et al

    G \'a mez Rosas , V., Isbell , J. W., Jaffe , W., et al. 2022, , 602, 403, 10.1038/s41586-021-04311-7

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    2017, , 469, 110, 10.1093/mnras/stx795

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Ramos Almeida , C., Landt , H., et al. 2017, , 469, 110, 10.1093/mnras/stx795

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    A., et al

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Ramos Almeida , C., Acosta-Pulido , J. A., et al. 2015, , 449, 1309, 10.1093/mnras/stv338

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    A., et al

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Ramos Almeida , C., Acosta-Pulido , J. A., et al. 2016, , 463, 3531, 10.1093/mnras/stw2125

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    2022 a , , 667, A140, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244230

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2022 a , , 667, A140, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244230

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    2022 b , , 666, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244806

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Rigopoulou , D., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al. 2022 b , , 666, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244806

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    2024, , 681, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348266

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Alonso-Herrero , A., Rigopoulou , D., et al. 2024, , 681, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348266

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    2016, , 823, L12, 10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L12

    Garc \' a-Burillo , S., Combes , F., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2016, , 823, L12, 10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L12

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    2019, , 632, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936606

    Garc \' a-Burillo , S., Combes , F., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2019, , 632, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936606

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    2021, , 652, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141075

    Garc \' a-Burillo , S., Alonso-Herrero , A., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2021, , 652, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141075

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    2016, , 458, 4512, 10.1093/mnras/stw626

    Garc \' a-Gonz \'a lez , J., Alonso-Herrero , A., Hern \'a n-Caballero , A., et al. 2016, , 458, 4512, 10.1093/mnras/stw626

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    M., D \' az-Santos , T., et al

    Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., Rodr \' guez-Espinosa , J. M., D \' az-Santos , T., et al. 2013, , 553, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220382

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al

    Haidar , H., Rosario , D. J., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.16100, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.16100

    2024 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    Harris , G. L. H., Rejkuba , M., & Harris , W. E. 2010, , 27, 457, 10.1071/AS09061

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    2015, , 803, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/110

    Hatziminaoglou , E., Hern \'a n-Caballero , A., Feltre , A., & Pi \ n ol Ferrer , N. 2015, , 803, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/110

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    L., Adams , J

    Herter , T. L., Adams , J. D., De Buizer , J. M., et al. 2012, , 749, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L18

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    A., Faber , S

    Holtzman , J. A., Faber , S. M., Shaya , E. J., et al. 1992, , 103, 691, 10.1086/116094

    1992 doi

  42. [50]

    H \"o nig , S. F. 2019, , 884, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4591

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    F., Kishimoto , M., Antonucci , R., et al

    H \"o nig , S. F., Kishimoto , M., Antonucci , R., et al. 2012, , 755, 149, 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/149

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    2017, , 835, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/74

    Ichikawa , K., Ricci , C., Ueda , Y., et al. 2017, , 835, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/74

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    2018, , 853, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa8df

    Imanishi , M., Nakanishi , K., Izumi , T., & Wada , K. 2018, , 853, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa8df

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    D., Wada , K., et al

    Imanishi , M., Nguyen , D. D., Wada , K., et al. 2020, , 902, 99, 10.3847/1538-4357/abaf50

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    W., Meisenheimer , K., Pott , J

    Isbell , J. W., Meisenheimer , K., Pott , J. U., et al. 2022, , 663, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243271

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    2023, , 519, 5324, 10.1093/mnras/stac3827

    Kakkad , D., Stalevski , M., Kishimoto , M., et al. 2023, , 519, 5324, 10.1093/mnras/stac3827

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Kov \'a cs , A. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7020, Millimeter and Submillimeter Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. W. D. Duncan , W. S. Holland , S. Withington , & J. Zmuidzinas , 70201S, 10.1117/12.790276

    2008 doi

  50. [58]

    C., Dowell , C

    Kov \'a cs , A., Chapman , S. C., Dowell , C. D., et al. 2006, , 650, 592, 10.1086/506341

    2006 doi

  51. [59]

    J., Ghosh , T., Pedlar , A., et al

    Kukula , M. J., Ghosh , T., Pedlar , A., et al. 1993, , 264, 893, 10.1093/mnras/264.4.893

    1993 doi

  52. [60]

    J., Spoon , H

    Lebouteiller , V., Barry , D. J., Spoon , H. W. W., et al. 2011, , 196, 8, 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/8

    2011 doi

  53. [61]

    M., Terndrup , D

    Leighly , K. M., Terndrup , D. M., Baron , E., et al. 2014, , 788, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/123

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    L \'o pez-Gonzaga , N., Burtscher , L., Tristram , K. R. W., Meisenheimer , K., & Schartmann , M. 2016, , 591, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527590

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    L \'o pez-Gonzaga , N., Jaffe , W., Burtscher , L., Tristram , K. R. W., & Meisenheimer , K. 2014, , 565, A71, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323002

    2014 doi

  56. [64]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 604, 10.1038/s41550-021-01329-9

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 604, 10.1038/s41550-021-01329-9

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    2022 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.09466

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Kishimoto , M., Antonucci , R., et al. 2022 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.09466. 2207.09466

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    2023, , 951, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/accb96

    ---. 2023, , 951, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/accb96

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    J., et al

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Packham , C., Jones , T. J., et al. 2015, , 452, 1902, 10.1093/mnras/stv1410

    2015 doi

  60. [68]

    2018, ArXiv e-prints

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Fuller , L., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al. 2018, ArXiv e-prints. 1804.04134

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    D., Jones , T

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Dowell , C. D., Jones , T. J., et al. 2020, , 888, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5849

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    2022 b , , 936, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Clarke , M., Shenoy , S., et al. 2022 b , , 936, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac83ac

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    2004, , 351, 169, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x

    Marconi , A., Risaliti , G., Gilli , R., et al. 2004, , 351, 169, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x

    2004

  64. [72]

    Marinucci , A., Bianchi , S., Nicastro , F., Matt , G., & Goulding , A. D. 2012, , 748, 130, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/130

    2012 doi

  65. [73]

    W., Mulchaey , J

    Martini , P., Regan , M. W., Mulchaey , J. S., & Pogge , R. W. 2003, , 146, 353, 10.1086/367817

    2003 doi

  66. [74]

    E., Geballe , T

    Mason , R. E., Geballe , T. R., Packham , C., et al. 2006, , 640, 612, 10.1086/500299

    2006 doi

  67. [75]

    E., Levenson , N

    Mason , R. E., Levenson , N. A., Shi , Y., et al. 2009, , 693, L136, 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/L136

    2009 doi

  68. [76]

    E., Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Packham , C., et al

    Mason , R. E., Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Packham , C., et al. 2012, , 144, 11, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/11

    2012 doi

  69. [77]

    F., Shimizu , T

    Mel \'e ndez , M., Mushotzky , R. F., Shimizu , T. T., Barger , A. J., & Cowie , L. L. 2014, , 794, 152, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/152

    2014 doi

  70. [78]

    J., Speck , A., & Volk , K

    Messenger , S. J., Speck , A., & Volk , K. 2013, , 764, 142, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/142

    2013 doi

  71. [79]

    2012, , 420, 526, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20060.x

    Mor , R., & Netzer , H. 2012, , 420, 526, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20060.x

    2012

  72. [80]

    2009, , 705, 298, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/298

    Mor , R., Netzer , H., & Elitzur , M. 2009, , 705, 298, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/298

    2009 doi

  73. [81]

    S., Wilson , A

    Mulchaey , J. S., Wilson , A. S., Bower , G. A., et al. 1994, , 433, 625, 10.1086/174671

    1994 doi

  74. [82]

    M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M

    Nenkova , M., Sirocky , M. M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M. 2008 a , , 685, 147, 10.1086/590482

    2008 doi

  75. [83]

    M., Nikutta , R., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M

    Nenkova , M., Sirocky , M. M., Nikutta , R., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M. 2008 b , , 685, 160, 10.1086/590483

    2008 doi

  76. [84]

    T., Roche , P

    Packham , C., Radomski , J. T., Roche , P. F., et al. 2005, , 618, L17, 10.1086/427691

    2005 doi

  77. [85]

    W., & De Robertis , M

    Pogge , R. W., & De Robertis , M. M. 1995, , 451, 585, 10.1086/176246

    1995 doi

  78. [86]

    C., Brookes , M

    Quillen , A. C., Brookes , M. H., Keene , J., et al. 2006, , 645, 1092, 10.1086/504418

    2006 doi

  79. [87]

    2008, , 484, 341, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077444

    Raban , D., Heijligers , B., R \"o ttgering , H., et al. 2008, , 484, 341, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077444

    2008 doi

  80. [88]

    T., Pi \ n a , R

    Radomski , J. T., Pi \ n a , R. K., Packham , C., et al. 2003, , 587, 117, 10.1086/367612

    2003 doi

  81. [89]

    T., Packham , C., Levenson , N

    Radomski , J. T., Packham , C., Levenson , N. A., et al. 2008, , 681, 141, 10.1086/587771

    2008 doi

  82. [90]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 679, 10.1038/s41550-017-0232-z

    Ramos Almeida , C., & Ricci , C. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 679, 10.1038/s41550-017-0232-z

    2017 doi

  83. [91]

    A., Rodr \' guez Espinosa , J

    Ramos Almeida , C., Levenson , N. A., Rodr \' guez Espinosa , J. M., et al. 2009, , 702, 1127, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1127

    2009 doi

  84. [92]

    A., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al

    Ramos Almeida , C., Levenson , N. A., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al. 2011, , 731, 92, 10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/92

    2011 doi

  85. [93]

    S., Veilleux , S., & Sanders , D

    Rupke , D. S., Veilleux , S., & Sanders , D. B. 2005, , 632, 751, 10.1086/444451

    2005 doi

  86. [94]

    Rupke , D. S. N., & Veilleux , S. 2011, , 729, L27, 10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L27

    2011 doi

  87. [95]

    I., Sternberg , A., et al

    Sani , E., Davies , R. I., Sternberg , A., et al. 2012, , 424, 1963, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21333.x

    2012

  88. [96]

    Schinnerer , E., Eckart , A., & Tacconi , L. J. 2001, , 549, 254, 10.1086/319052

    2001 doi

  89. [97]

    Stalevski , M., Asmus , D., & Tristram , K. R. W. 2017, , 472, 3854, 10.1093/mnras/stx2227

    2017 doi

  90. [98]

    2023, , 519, 3237, 10.1093/mnras/stac3753

    Stalevski , M., Gonz \'a lez-Gait \'a n , S., Savi \'c , D., et al. 2023, , 519, 3237, 10.1093/mnras/stac3753

    2023 doi

  91. [99]

    Stalevski , M., Tristram , K. R. W., & Asmus , D. 2019, , 484, 3334, 10.1093/mnras/stz220

    2019 doi

  92. [100]

    2022, , 926, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac38a8

    Takasao , S., Shuto , Y., & Wada , K. 2022, , 926, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac38a8

    2022 doi

  93. [101]

    Tristram , K. R. W., Burtscher , L., Jaffe , W., et al. 2014, , 563, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322698

    2014 doi

  94. [102]

    B., Rizzi , L., Shaya , E

    Tully , R. B., Rizzi , L., Shaya , E. J., et al. 2009, , 138, 323, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/2/323

    2009 doi

  95. [103]

    S., & Wilson , A

    Ulvestad , J. S., & Wilson , A. S. 1984, , 278, 544, 10.1086/161821

    1984 doi

  96. [104]

    M., & Padovani , P

    Urry , C. M., & Padovani , P. 1995, , 107, 803, 10.1086/133630

    1995 doi

  97. [105]

    2020, , 900, 174, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba89f

    Venanzi , M., H \"o nig , S., & Williamson , D. 2020, , 900, 174, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba89f

    2020 doi

  98. [106]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  99. [107]

    M., Meier , D

    Young , L. M., Meier , D. S., Bureau , M., et al. 2021, , 909, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe126

    2021 doi

  100. [108]

    Yuan , F., Markoff , S., Falcke , H., & Biermann , P. L. 2002, , 391, 139, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020817

    2002 doi

  101. [109]

    Zhang , L., & Ho , L. C. 2023, , 953, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/acea73

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.