Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Well-posedness for a two-phase Stefan problem with radiation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-phase Stefan problem with radiation is well-posed, locally and globally.

desk verdict A credible first rigorous treatment of a Stefan problem with volumetric radiation; the local theory is checkable, but the global theorem currently rests on a regularity bootstrap the paper explicitly omits. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24602 v1 pith:R37YJISP submitted 2025-05-30 math.AP

Elena Demattè , Juan J. L. Velázquez This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35R3535K5580A2235A0135B50
keywords Stefanproblemradiativetransferfreeboundarynonlocalparabolicequationwell-posednessBanachfixedpointmaximumprinciplephasechange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a one-dimensional two-phase Stefan problem in which heat moves by conduction in both phases and also by radiation inside the solid, while the liquid is transparent to radiation. The authors reduce the radiative transfer equation to a nonlocal integral term with an exponential-integral kernel, so the solid temperature obeys a parabolic equation with a nonlocal emission term. Their main result is that for bounded initial data with the liquid initially above and the solid initially below the melting temperature, a unique solution exists locally in time, becomes classical away from t=0, and preserves the correct phase ordering. A second theorem gives global existence and uniqueness whenever the initial liquid temperature stays below TM + κL²/(K TM) and the initial solid temperature stays above 0, proved with stationary sub- and supersolutions and the maximum principle. If the results are correct, this is a well-posedness theory for melting with combined conduction and radiation that also exposes an explicit quantitative condition on the initial data separating global solvability from possible failure.

What carries the argument

The moving-coordinate change y = x − s(t) fixes the interface at y = 0, and the radiative transfer equation is solved by characteristics, turning radiation into the nonlocal term Iα[T] = T⁴(y) − ∫₀^∞ (α/2)E1(α|y−η|)T⁴(η)dη, where E1 is the exponential integral. The local fixed-point operator uses the half-space heat kernel G(y,ξ,a(t−τ)) = Φ(y−ξ,·) − Φ(y+ξ,·) to represent the temperatures u1,u2 and the Stefan velocity ṡ as integrals over initial data and nonlinear sources. For the global result, the load-bearing object is the stationary barrier w defined piecewise on R± and depending on parameters C1,C2,α chosen so that the inequalities L1(w) > 0 and L2(w) < 0 hold relative to the bounds on ṡ; this barrier controls the solution through the maximum principle.

What would settle it

Work out the differentiated equation for v = ∂yT2 and check whether the source term 4∫₀^∞ (α/2)E1(α(y−η))T2³(η)∂ηT2(η)dη really lies in $C^{{δ/2,δ}}$_{t,y} with the stated Hölder exponents; exhibiting initial data for which ∂yT2 is only Lipschitz in space at t = 0 would invalidate the omitted bootstrap and therefore the global well-posedness theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the free boundary problem (2.1) — a heat equation in the liquid, a heat equation with a nonlocal radiative term in the solid, and the Stefan condition for the interface speed — is well-posed. Locally the proof rewrites the solution as the fixed point of an operator built from half-space Green's functions for the heat equation, estimates the nonlocal radiation term in $C^{{0,1}}$, and applies the Banach contraction theorem on a small time interval; the fixed-point solution is then upgraded to a classical Hölder solution using parabolic estimates. Globally, the paper constructs stationary barrier functions w: on y<0 the barrier solves κw'' − C1w' = 0 and on y>0 it satisfies w'' + C2w' ≥ w⁴, with w(0)=TM. If the initial temperature lies below w on the liquid side and above w on the solid side, comparison shows that these inequalities persist, which bounds the temperature, its spatial derivative, and the interface speed, so the local solution extends to all times.

Load-bearing premise

The global existence proof rests on a regularity bootstrap asserting that the solutions lie in $C^{{1+δ/2,3+δ}}$_{t,y} on [ε,t*] × R±, stated in the paper with the sentence 'Since the computations are similar ... we omit the details'; if that bootstrap fails, the maximum-principle control of ∂yT2 and hence the global theorem is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every initial profile satisfying the hypotheses of Theorem 2.1, there is a unique solution up to some positive time t*, and that solution is classical for t > 0 with the interface speed given by the Stefan condition.
  • If the initial liquid temperature is below TM + κL²/(K TM) and the initial solid temperature is bounded away from 0, the unique solution exists for all positive times.
  • Along the solution, the phase ordering is preserved: the liquid stays above the melting temperature and the solid stays between 0 and TM, so no supercooled liquid or superheated solid appears in this regime.
  • The interface speed remains bounded between two constants determined by the barrier parameters, and the spatial derivatives of the temperature stay bounded, growing at most linearly in time on the liquid side and exponentially in time on the solid side.
  • The global result applies to a class of initial data that is optimal for the barrier argument: taking the parameters to their limiting values makes the liquid-side bound converge exactly to the threshold TM + κL²/(K TM).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The threshold sup_{R−} T0 < TM + κL²/(K TM) is likely sharp for the barrier method, and near that threshold the solid-side barrier approaches TM from below while the interface speed is allowed to grow without bound; testing initial data at or above the threshold may reveal finite-time blow-up of the interface velocity.
  • Because the model assumes a transparent liquid and no external radiation, radiation can leave the solid but never return; adding an incoming radiative boundary condition gν(n) > 0 at the interface would plausibly produce superheated solid, as the paper notes, and one could test whether the same barrier construction still works in that regime.
  • The reduction from the kinetic radiative transfer equation to the nonlocal parabolic model drops the (1/c)∂tIν term, treating the photon transit time as negligible; a quantitative error estimate comparing this model with the full kinetic system in the c → ∞ limit would be a natural companion test of the modeling premise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies a one-dimensional two-phase Stefan problem with radiative transfer in the solid phase. After a quasi-static reduction of the radiative transfer equation, the model becomes a parabolic free-boundary system with a nonlocal operator I_alpha[T] = T^4 - integral (alpha/2) E1(alpha|y-eta|) T^4 deta. The authors prove local existence and uniqueness for the free-boundary problem by a Banach fixed-point argument in a C^{0,1} space, then upgrade the solution to classical Holder regularity, and finally prove a global well-posedness result for a class of initial data satisfying an explicit smallness condition on the liquid temperature and a positivity condition on the solid temperature. The global theorem is proved by constructing explicit stationary sub- and supersolutions and applying maximum-principle comparisons to the temperature and its spatial derivative.

Significance. If completed, this would be the first rigorous well-posedness theory for this Stefan-radiation model, and the explicit barrier construction gives a quantitative, checkable global existence condition. The local fixed-point argument is written in enough detail to be verifiable, and the reduction from the radiative transfer equation to the nonlocal parabolic operator is standard and correctly derived. The main limitation is that the global theorem currently rests on an asserted but omitted regularity bootstrap; that bootstrap is load-bearing for the derivative comparison argument, so the paper is not yet self-contained in its claimed form.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 3.1] The global theorem is not established as written because the proof of the uniform bound on derivative_y T_2 depends on a regularity bootstrap that is asserted but not proved. The text states: "One can prove that T_i in C^{1+delta/2,3+delta}_{t,y}([epsilon,t*] x [gamma, infinity)) ... Since the computations are similar to the one in Proposition 2.1, Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.2 we omit the details." This is not a routine repetition: differentiating the nonlocal term I_alpha[T_2] produces a convolution of T_2^3 derivative_y T_2 with the kernel E_1 and a boundary term proportional to T_M^4 E_1(alpha y). Without a rigorous derivation of the equations L^1_2(derivative_y T_2) = (alpha/2) T_M^4 E_1(alpha y) and L^2_2(derivative_y T_2) = 0, the subsequent maximum-principle comparisons for derivative_y T_2 have no justified object to act on. Since the boundedness of derivative_y T_2 is exactly what allows extension past the local existence time t*, Theorem 3.1 is incomplete without a detailed proof of this bootstrap.
  2. [Section 2, proof of Lemma 2.3, Eq. (2.36)] In the convergence step for the approximating problems, the text states that the limiting integral equations hold "where a_1 = kappa and a_2 = 0." This is inconsistent with the representation (2.4) and with the equation (2.22), where the coefficient in front of the second spatial derivative for u_2 is 1, not 0. The value should be a_2 = 1. As written, the limiting equation for u_2 would involve a heat kernel with zero diffusivity, which cannot be the intended statement. This appears to be a typographical error, but it should be corrected because Eq. (2.36) is the basis for identifying the limit with the fixed-point solution.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1.1] The statement says "the temperature satisfies T_0(x) > T_M if x < s(t), T_0(s(t)) = T_M, T_0(x) < T_M if x > s(t)"; the symbol T_0 should be T(t,x), since the inequalities are for the evolved temperature, not the initial data.
  2. [Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.1] After constructing the constants C_1, C_2, the text says "we have found constants C_1, C_2 > 0 such that w(y) < T_0(y) for y < 0 and T_0(y) > 0 for y > 0." This is the reverse of the required inequalities. The preceding construction shows that T_0(y) < w(y) for y < 0 and T_0(y) > w(y) for y > 0, so this sentence should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3, Theorem 3.1 and its proof] The formula for Gamma_plus/minus(C_1) is written with C_2 inside the square root: "Gamma_plus/minus(C_1) = (L C_1 +/- sqrt(L^2 C_2? 1 - T_M^5))/2." The quantity under the square root should depend on C_1^2, not on C_2, as is clear from the later derivation of the quadratic inequality 4 C_2^2 T_M - 4 L C_1 C_2 + T_M^4 < 0.
  4. [Lemma 2.3] In the statement of the lemma, the Holder regularity of u_2 is written as "u_1 in C^{delta/2,1+delta}_{t,y}([0,t*] x [0,R])"; this should be u_2. The same typo appears in the following line for u_1.
  5. [Theorem 1.2 vs. Theorem 3.1] Theorem 1.2 states only that a "large class" of initial data yields global well-posedness, while Theorem 3.1 gives explicit conditions. The introductory statement should refer to the explicit conditions in Theorem 3.1 so that the reader does not have to locate them later.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper derives its nonlocal Stefan model from the radiative transfer equation and proves well-posedness by fixed point and barrier arguments without fitting parameters or assuming its conclusions.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters, no data, and no conclusion assumed as an input. The nonlocal operator I_alpha[T] is derived from the stationary radiative transfer equation by solving along characteristics, and the key divergence identity is computed explicitly in the text (Section 1.3). The local well-posedness proof is a Banach fixed-point argument on Green's function representations, and the global theorem is proved by explicit stationary sub- and supersolutions constructed in Lemma 3.1. The authors cite their previous works [12] and [13] for computational similarity, but the relevant computations are reproduced or stated with enough detail that the load-bearing content is self-contained rather than inherited from self-citation. The only substantive concern is the asserted but omitted C^{1+delta/2,3+delta} regularity bootstrap in Section 3, which is a possible gap or correctness risk, not a circularity: it does not assume the theorem being proved, and it is not equivalent to any fitted or predefined quantity. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof rests on standard parabolic theory and maximum principles, on the stationary approximation to radiative transfer, and on the initial-data restrictions in Theorem 3.1. No free parameters or invented entities are used; constants C1, C2, and alpha in the barrier construction are auxiliary choices, not fitted values.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Classical parabolic regularity estimates and maximum principles for parabolic operators in half-spaces.
    Used throughout Section 2.2 and Section 3, with references to Ladyzhenskaya-Solonnikov-Ural'ceva [30] and Friedman [17,18].
  • domain assumption Stationary radiative transfer approximation: the 1/c partial_t I term in Eq. (1.2) is neglected.
    Introduced in Section 1 after Eq. (1.4); this reduces the kinetic equation to a stationary equation solved by characteristics and produces the nonlocal term I_alpha.
  • domain assumption Grey, non-scattering, constant absorption coefficient and transparent liquid with opaque solid.
    Stated in Section 1 around Eq. (1.2)-(1.7); these determine the specific kernel alpha E1(alpha |.|)/2 and the no-incoming-radiation boundary condition at the interface.
  • domain assumption Initial data satisfy C^{0,1}(R), C^2 on each half-line, T0(0)=TM, T0>TM on R-, 0<T0<TM on R+, and for the global result sup_{R-} T0 < TM + kappa L^2/(K TM) and inf_{R+} T0 > 0.
    Assumptions of Theorems 2.1, 2.2, and 3.1; the global class is exactly the class for which the barrier w can be built.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Well-posedness for a two-phase Stefan problem with radiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R37YJISP

@misc{pith2026250524602,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Well-posedness for a two-phase Stefan problem with radiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R37YJISP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24602}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper we consider a free boundary problem for the melting of ice where we assume that the heat is transported by conduction in both the liquid and the solid part of the material and also by radiation in the solid. Specifically, we study a one-dimensional two-phase Stefan-like problem which contains a non-local integral operator in the equation describing the temperature distribution of the solid. We will prove the local well-posedness of this free boundary problem combining the Banach fixed-point theorem and classical parabolic theory. Moreover, constructing suitable stationary sub- and supersolutions we will develop a global well-posedness theory for a large class of initial data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24602 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the considered model at the initial time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the characteristics. Solving the radiative transfer equation by characteristics we hence obtain for x1 > s(t) Iν(t, x, n) = ˆ d(t,x,n) 0 dτα exp (−ατ ) Bν(T(t, x1 − τn1)). As we pointed out above, Iν is not zero on the liquid, i.e. for x1 < s(t), but is constant to the radiation intensity at the interface. Thus, for x1 < s(t) we have Iν(t, x, n) = 1{n1≤0} ˆ ∞ 0 dτα exp (−ατ ) Bν(T(t, s(t) − τn1)). Th… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abramzon and S

    B. Abramzon and S. Sazhin , Droplet vaporization model in the presence of thermal radiation , Interna- tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 48 (2005), pp. 1868–1873

    2005

  2. [2]

    Bardos, F

    C. Bardos, F. Golse, and B. Perthame , The radiative transfer equations: existence of solutions and diffusion approximation under accretivity assumptions—a survey , in Proceedings of the conference on mathematical methods applied to kinetic equations (Paris, 1985), vol. 16, 1987, pp. 637–652

    1985

  3. [3]

    Pure Appl

    , The Rosseland approximation for the radiative transfer equations , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 40 (1987), pp. 691–721

    1987

  4. [4]

    Bertsch, P

    M. Bertsch, P. de Mottoni, and L. A. Peletier , The Stefan problem with a heating term , in Free boundary problems: applications and theory, Vol. III (Maubuisson, 1984), vol. 120 of Res. Notes in Math., Pitman, Boston, MA, 1985, pp. 1–7

    1984

  5. [5]

    J. R. Cannon, D. B. Henry, and D. B. Kotlow, Classical solutions of the one-dimensional, two-phase Stefan problem, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 107 (1975), pp. 311–341

    1975

  6. [6]

    J. R. Cannon and M. Primicerio , A two phase Stefan problem with temperature boundary conditions , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 88 (1971), pp. 177–191

    1971

  7. [7]

    S. Chan, D. Cho, and G. Kocamustafaogullari , Melting and solidification with internal radiative transfer—a generalized phase change model , International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 26 (1983), pp. 621–633

    1983

  8. [8]

    Chandrasekhar, Radiative transfer, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1960

    S. Chandrasekhar, Radiative transfer, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1960

    1960

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Compton, LXXIII

    K. Compton, LXXIII. Some properties of resonance radiation and excited atoms, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 45 (1923), pp. 750–760

    1923

  2. [10]

    Dematt`e, On a kinetic equation describing the behavior of a gas interacting mainly with radiation , Journal of Statistical Physics, 190 (2023), p

    E. Dematt`e, On a kinetic equation describing the behavior of a gas interacting mainly with radiation , Journal of Statistical Physics, 190 (2023), p. 124

    2023

  3. [11]

    Dematt`e, J

    E. Dematt`e, J. W. Jang, and J. J. L. Vel ´azquez, Compactness and existence theory for a general class of stationary radiative transfer equations . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.12828, 2024

    2024 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dematt`e and J

    E. Dematt`e and J. J. L. Vel´azquez, Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium diffusion approximation for the radiative transfer equation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11797, 2024. 28

    2024

  5. [13]

    Henri Poincar´ e, (2025)

    , On the Diffusion Approximation of the Stationary Radiative Transfer Equation with Absorption and Emission, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Preprint

    , Traveling waves for a two-phase Stefan problem with radiation , 2025. Preprint

    2025

  7. [15]

    F asano and M

    A. F asano and M. Primicerio, Mushy regions with variable temperature in melting process , Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. B (6), 4 (1985), pp. 601–626

    1985

  8. [16]

    enthalpy formulation, Boll

    , Phase-change with volumetric heat sources: Stefan ’s scheme vs. enthalpy formulation, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. Suppl., (1985), pp. 131–149

    1985

  9. [17]

    Friedman , Free boundary problems for parabolic equations

    A. Friedman , Free boundary problems for parabolic equations. I. Melting of solids , J. Math. Mech., 8 (1959), pp. 499–517

    1959

  10. [18]

    , Partial differential equations of parabolic type , Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964

    1964

  11. [19]

    , One dimensional Stefan problems with nonmonotone free boundary , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 133 (1968), pp. 89–114

    1968

  12. [20]

    , The Stefan problem in several space variables , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 133 (1968), pp. 51–87

    1968

  13. [21]

    Pure and Applied Mathematics

    , Variational principles and free-boundary problems, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982. Pure and Applied Mathematics

    1982

  14. [22]

    Friedman and D

    A. Friedman and D. Kinderlehrer, A one phase Stefan problem, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 24 (1974/75), pp. 1005–1035

    1974

  15. [23]

    Golse, F

    F. Golse, F. Hecht, O. Pironneau, D. Smets, and P.-H. Tournier , Radiative transfer for variable three-dimensional atmospheres, J. Comput. Phys., 475 (2023), pp. Paper No. 111864, 19

    2023

  16. [24]

    Golse and O

    F. Golse and O. Pironneau , Radiative transfer in a fluid , Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas F ´ ıs. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM, 117 (2023), pp. Paper No. 37, 17

    2023

  17. [25]

    J. W. Jang and J. J. L. Vel ´azquez, LTE and non-LTE solutions in gases interacting with radiation , J. Stat. Phys., 186 (2022), pp. Paper No. 47, 62

    2022

  18. [26]

    3478–3508

    , On the Temperature Distribution of a Body Heated by Radiation , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 56 (2024), pp. 3478–3508

    2024

  19. [27]

    Jin, F.-X

    Z.-C. Jin, F.-X. Sun, X.-L. Xia, and C. Sun , Numerical investigation of evaporation and radiation absorption of a non-spherical water droplet under asymmetrically radiative heating , International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 140 (2019), pp. 66–79

    2019

  20. [28]

    A. A. Lacey and M. Shillor , The existence and stability of regions with superheating in the classical two-phase one-dimensional Stefan problem with heat sources , IMA J. Appl. Math., 30 (1983), pp. 215–230

    1983

  21. [29]

    A. A. Lacey and A. B. Tayler , A mushy region in a Stefan problem , IMA J. Appl. Math., 30 (1983), pp. 303–313

    1983

  22. [30]

    O. A. Ladyˇzenskaja, V. A. Solonnikov, and N. N. Ural’ceva , Linear and quasilinear equations of parabolic type, vol. Vol. 23 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1968. Translated from the Russian by S. Smith

    1968

  23. [31]

    P. L. C. Lage and R. H. Rangel, Single Droplet Vaporization Including Thermal Radiation Absorption , Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 7 (1993), pp. 502–509

    1993

  24. [32]

    A. M. Meirmanov , The Stefan problem , vol. 3 of De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1992. Translated from the Russian by Marek Niezg´ odka and Anna Crowley, With an appendix by the author and I. G. G¨ otz

    1992

  25. [33]

    Mihalas and B

    D. Mihalas and B. W. Mihalas , Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics , Oxford University Press, New York, 1984

    1984

  26. [34]

    E. A. Milne , The Diffusion of Imprisoned Radiation Through a Gas , J. London Math. Soc., 1 (1926), pp. 40–51. 29

    1926

  27. [35]

    Oxenius, Kinetic theory of particles and photons , vol

    J. Oxenius, Kinetic theory of particles and photons , vol. 20 of Springer Series in Electrophysics, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1986. Theoretical foundations of non-LTE plasma spectroscopy

    1986

  28. [36]

    Primicerio and M

    M. Primicerio and M. Ughi , Phase-change problems with mushy regions , in Free boundary problems: applications and theory, Vol. III (Maubuisson, 1984), vol. 120 of Res. Notes in Math., Pitman, Boston, MA, 1985, pp. 61–71

    1984

  29. [37]

    L. I. Rubenˇste˘in, The Stefan problem, vol. Vol. 27 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1971. Translated from the Russian by A. D. Solomon

    1971

  30. [38]

    N. A. Rubtsov, N. A. Savvinova, and S. D. Sleptsov , Numerical Simulation of Stefan ’s Problem in a Plane Layer with Selective Optical Properties of a Semitransparent Medium , in 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2016, pp. 1211–1215

    2016

  31. [39]

    , Modeling of ice heating and melting in approximation of the Stefan problem considering radiation , Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 25 (2018), pp. 421–428

    2018

  32. [40]

    N. A. Rubtsov and S. D. Sleptsov , Radiant-conductive heat transfer in semitransparent medium with phase transition at boundaries with different absorptivity , Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 17 (2010), pp. 221–228

    2010

  33. [41]

    R. J. Rutten , Radiative Transfer in Stellar Atmospheres . https://robrutten.nl/rrweb/rjr-pubs/ 2003rtsa.book.....R.pdf, 2003. Utrecht University lecture notes, 8th edition

    2003

  34. [42]

    S. S. Sazhin , Modelling of fuel droplet heating and evaporation: Recent results and unsolved problems , Fuel, 196 (2017), pp. 69–101

    2017

  35. [43]

    M. Sitarski, Thermal Dynamics of a Small Vaporizing Slurry Droplet in a Hot and Radiant Environment; Feasibility of the Secondary Atomization , Combustion Science and Technology, 71 (1990), pp. 53–75

    1990

  36. [44]

    J. Stefan, ¨Uber die Beziehung zwischen der W¨ armestrahlung und der Temperatur , Sitzungsberichte / Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 79 (1879), pp. 391– 428

  37. [45]

    965– 983

    , ¨Uber die Theorie der Eisbildung, insbesondere ¨ uber die Eisbildung im polarmeere, Sitzungsberichte / Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 98 (1889), pp. 965– 983

  38. [46]

    A. M. Timofeev , Effect of optical properties on radiative-conductive heat transfer in a system of two semitransparent layers, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 27 (2020), pp. 131–138

    2020

  39. [47]

    Visintin , Models for supercooling and superheating effects , vol

    A. Visintin , Models for supercooling and superheating effects , vol. 425 of Istituto di Analisi Numerica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche [Institute of Numerical Analysis of the National Research Council], Istituto di Analisi Numerica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricer...

    1984

  40. [48]

    Visintin, Models of phase transitions , vol

    A. Visintin, Models of phase transitions , vol. 28 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1996

    1996

  41. [49]

    F. A. Williams , On vaporation of mist by radiation , Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 8 (1965), pp. 575–587

    1965

  42. [50]

    H. Xie, M. Zhu, B. Zhang, and X. Guan , The Review of the Phase Transition Radiation , Energy Procedia, 16 (2012), pp. 997–1002. 2012 International Conference on Future Energy, Environment, and Materials

    2012

  43. [51]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and Y. P. Raizer , Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena, Dover Publications, 2002. 30

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.