Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Challenges of Anomaly Detection in the Object-Centric Setting: Dimensions and the Role of Domain Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.09023 v1 pith:R3UIVODF submitted 2024-07-12 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords object-centricanomalydetectiondifferentrolediscussdomainknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Object-centric event logs, allowing events related to different objects of different object types, represent naturally the execution of business processes, such as ERP (O2C and P2P) and CRM. However, modeling such complex information requires novel process mining techniques and might result in complex sets of constraints. Object-centric anomaly detection exploits both the lifecycle and the interactions between the different objects. Therefore, anomalous patterns are proposed to the user without requiring the definition of object-centric process models. This paper proposes different methodologies for object-centric anomaly detection and discusses the role of domain knowledge for these methodologies. We discuss the advantages and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the provision of such domain knowledge. Following our experience in a real-life P2P process, we also discuss the role of algorithms (dimensionality reduction+anomaly detection), suggest some pre-processing steps, and discuss the role of feature propagation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging GPT-4o Efficiency for Detecting Rework Anomaly in Business Processes

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPT-4o achieves 74-98% accuracy on synthetic rework anomaly detection depending on prompt type and anomaly distribution, but the prompt examples leak from the test set.

Pith tools