pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.14362 · v2 · pith:R3UREFXRnew · submitted 2025-02-20 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

Unifying models of belief dynamics: a meta-model with Personal, Expressed and Social beliefs

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph
keywords beliefbeliefsmodelsdynamicssocialmeta-modelpersonalexpressed
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Beliefs are central to individual decision-making and societal dynamics, and they are shaped through complex interactions between personal cognition and social environments. Traditional models of belief dynamics often fail to capture the interplay between internal belief systems and external influences. We present a meta-model that represents belief dynamics through three belief types: Personal beliefs, Expressed beliefs, and Social beliefs about others (PES). This distinction allows the model to account for the potential misperception of others' beliefs as well as distortions in the belief expression, and it permits the formalization of psychological processes such as ego projection, social influence, authenticity, and conformity. These processes have been studied extensively in social psychology but are rarely integrated into a comprehensive formal model. The PES meta-model also encompasses many existing belief dynamics models, such as versions of the Voter, Ising, DeGroot, and bounded confidence models. Its nested structure enables comparative analyses between different models and supports the construction of new models by recombining its components, providing a flexible framework for cumulative theory development.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can homophily explain public underestimation of climate policy support?

    physics.soc-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Homophily in network models can explain asymmetric underestimation of climate policy support, with media bias plus symmetric homophily also reproducing observed patterns.