Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Roughness-facilitated local 1/2 scaling does not imply the onset of the ultimate regime of thermal convection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.05126 v1 pith:R3Y4MINJ submitted 2017-04-17 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords regimescalingconvectionmathrmlocalthermalultimateback
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In thermal convection, roughness is often used as a means to enhance heat transport, expressed in Nusselt number. Yet there is no consensus on whether the Nusselt vs. Rayleigh number scaling exponent ($\mathrm{Nu} \sim \mathrm{Ra}^\beta$) increases or remains unchanged. Here we numerically investigate turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection over rough plates in two dimensions, up to $\mathrm{Ra}=10^{12}$. Varying the height and wavelength of the roughness elements with over 200 combinations, we reveal the existence of two universal regimes. In the first regime, the local effective scaling exponent can reach up to 1/2. However, this cannot be explained as the attainment of the so-called ultimate regime as suggested in previous studies, because a further increase in $\mathrm{Ra}$ leads to the second regime, in which the scaling saturates back to a value close to the smooth case. Counterintuitively, the transition from the first to the second regime corresponds to the competition between bulk and boundary layer flow: from the bulk-dominated regime back to the classical boundary-layer-controlled regime. Our study clearly demonstrates that the local $1/2$ scaling does not signal the onset of asymptotic ultimate thermal convection.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools