Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 97 references

Physical properties and gas kinematics of massive star forming region G328.24$-$0.55

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ALMA data show five protostellar cores in G328.24−0.55, the dominant one still accreting and driving a bipolar outflow.

desk verdict A useful first high-res ALMA case study of G328.24−0.55; the rotation interpretation is under-supported, but the paper is worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01582 v1 pith:R47GKYSJ submitted 2025-05-02 astro-ph.GA

Chukwuebuka J. Ugwu , James O. Chibueze This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords massivestarformationprotostarsALMAmolecularoutflowsrotatingenvelopeshotcoresG328.24-0.55methanolmasers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses ALMA band 6 archival observations to resolve the massive star-forming region G328.24$-$0.55 into five dust continuum cores: MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2 and MM3. The authors find that the brightest core, MM1a, is chemically the richest, with about 70 molecular transitions, an excitation temperature near 183 K, and a mass of roughly 23 $M_\odot$. A velocity gradient in methanol CH$_3$OH ($10_{2,8}-9_{3,7}$) emission is interpreted as a rotating envelope around MM1a, and CO $J=2-1$ emission shows a bipolar outflow aligned with that structure. Taken together, these properties point to MM1a as a massive protostar still undergoing accretion and outflow in an early formative stage.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tracer is the methanol line CH$_3$OH ($10_{2,8}-9_{3,7}$) at 232.418 GHz, whose narrow, spatially compact profile and east-west velocity gradient are used to identify a rotating envelope around MM1a. The CO $J=2-1$ transition provides the outflow signature, with blue- and red-shifted wings on opposite sides of the source. Rotational diagram analysis of multiple CH$_3$OH transitions yields excitation temperatures of about 183, 168 and 110 K for MM1a, MM1b and MM1c, which are adopted as dust temperatures in the mass estimates.

What would settle it

A position-velocity diagram cut along the CH$_3$OH gradient's major axis, made at higher angular resolution or with an optically thin isotope, would settle the rotation interpretation: a rotating envelope shows a monotonic, smooth velocity change across the continuum peak, whereas outflow or infall produces a different position-velocity signature and blending from two components would appear as separate peaks in the spectrum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that MM1a, the dominant 1.3 mm dust continuum core in G328.24$-$0.55, is a massive protostellar object in its early formative stage, still accreting material and driving a bipolar outflow. The evidence is kinematic: a first-moment velocity gradient in the CH$_3$OH ($10_{2,8}-9_{3,7}$) line places blueshifted emission to the east and redshifted emission to the west of the continuum peak, which the authors interpret as a rotating envelope about 2500 au across, and the CO $J=2-1$ line shows blue- and red-shifted lobes northeast and southwest of MM1a, tracing an outflow with a dynamical timescale of about $1.0\times10^4$ yr. The paper also reports that the detected dust continuum peaks coincide with the weaker MeerKAT radio continuum peak rather than the strongest one, and it characterizes the chemical richness of all five cores.

Load-bearing premise

The rotating-envelope conclusion rests on the assumption that the CH$_3$OH ($10_{2,8}-9_{3,7}$) velocity gradient seen in the first-moment map is produced by rotation around MM1a, not by outflow, global infall, or blending of two kinematically distinct components.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If MM1a is genuinely an accreting massive protostar, G328.24$-$0.55 becomes a benchmark case for studying the earliest stages of high-mass star formation, where a hot molecular core coexists with an outflow cavity and an ultra-compact HII region.
  • The coexistence of a rotating envelope and a bipolar outflow in MM1a suggests that the disk-outflow paradigm established for low-mass stars can operate at high masses.
  • The variation in line richness among the five cores (70, 49, 26, 7 and 8 detected transitions) places them at different evolutionary stages, with MM1a the most evolved and MM2 and MM3 the least.
  • The alignment of the 6.7 GHz CH$_3$OH masers with the outflow cavity offers a plausible explanation for the source's strong maser flux.
  • The reported sizes and timescale of the outflow are consistent with large-scale observations and simulations of outflows in high-mass star-forming regions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rotating-envelope interpretation is correct, the east-west CH$_3$OH velocity gradient could be used to derive a dynamical mass for MM1a, which would test whether the envelope is bound and infalling rather than merely outflowing.
  • The same dataset, or a higher-resolution ALMA configuration, could search for a compact disk inside the envelope and measure the gradient in an optically thin tracer such as $\mathrm{C^{18}O}$ to confirm that the gradient is not due to self-absorption or blending.
  • A systematic comparison of MM1b with MM1a might clarify whether the absence of a clear outflow in MM1b reflects a more advanced evolutionary stage, an unfavourable orientation, or simply weaker emission.
  • The positional offset between the ALMA dust peaks, the Spitzer infrared peak, and the ATCA/MeerKAT radio peak could be checked with astrometrically registered observations to determine whether it is purely instrumental or traces a genuine stratification of the source.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents ALMA Band 6 archival observations of the massive star-forming region G328.24−0.55. It identifies five dust continuum cores (MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2, MM3), catalogues their molecular line emission, derives excitation temperatures from CH3OH rotational diagrams for the three MM1 cores, and computes dust masses and column densities. The paper further reports a velocity gradient in CH3OH (102,8−93,7) toward MM1a, which it interprets as a rotating envelope, and bipolar CO(2−1) outflow lobes, which it attributes to MM1a. The central conclusion is that MM1a is a massive protostellar object still undergoing accretion and outflow in an early formative stage.

Significance. If the kinematic interpretation is confirmed, the paper adds a valuable high-resolution case study of a massive protostar with a rotating envelope and outflow, complementing the growing sample of such sources in the ALMA era. The strengths of the paper are the careful line identification and spectral catalogues for five cores, the rotational-diagram temperatures for MM1a/MM1b/MM1c, and the clear detection of a bipolar CO outflow. The detection of multiple cores with distinct molecular richness is also a useful observational contribution. However, the central accretion/rotation claim rests on a single first-moment gradient whose interpretation is not uniquely established by the presented material, and the physical parameters (masses, dynamical timescale) rely on assumptions whose uncertainties are not propagated. These issues need to be addressed before the main conclusion can be considered fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.3, Eq. 5] The interpretation of the CH3OH (102,8−93,7) first-moment map as a rotating envelope is not uniquely supported by the evidence shown. At a resolution of ~0.38" and a source extent of ~0.88" (about two beam widths), an east-west velocity gradient of order 10 km/s could also arise from an outflow with near and far sides projected across the continuum peak, from two kinematically distinct components blended within the beam, or from asymmetric infall. The paper provides no position-velocity diagram, no numerical value of the velocity gradient in km/s per arcsec, no test of whether the gradient axis is perpendicular to the CO outflow axis, and no decomposition of the line profile into multiple Gaussian components. Because this gradient is the primary direct evidence for rotation and hence active accretion, the central claim requires either additional quantitative analysis (e.g., a PV diagram, intensity-weighted velocity profile, or comparison of the implied dynamical mass with the 23.2 Msun continuum mass) or a more cautious statement that rotation is one of several possible interpretations.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eq. 5] The core masses and column densities are presented without propagated uncertainties from the dust temperature, dust opacity, distance, and, for MM2 and MM3, the assumed temperature of 20 K. For example, if the dust temperature of MM2 were 30 K rather than 20 K, the mass would change by a factor of roughly 2, which affects the evolutionary classification of these cores. Furthermore, using the CH3OH excitation temperature (183 K for MM1a) as the dust temperature in Eq. (1) is an assumption that should be explicitly justified and ideally tested against a dust-temperature-sensitive tracer or by quoting the mass range for a plausible Td interval. Without these uncertainty estimates, the reported mass ordering (MM1a > MM1b > MM3 > MM2 > MM1c) is not robust, and the classification of these objects as massive protostars is not quantitatively supported.
  3. [Section 4.3, Eq. 5] The outflow inclination of ~46° is stated without any derivation or reference to the method used, and the reported lobe sizes (31080 au and 14840 au) and dynamical timescale (1.03e4 yr) appear to depend on this inclination (e.g., through deprojection of Rmax). The paper should state how the inclination was determined (for example, from the blue-to-red lobe separation and the measured radial velocities under an assumed geometry) and how its uncertainty propagates into tdyn. As written, the dynamical timescale is not reproducible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] The HNCO line listed at 19.737 GHz is a typo; the frequency should be 219.737 GHz based on the context and the adjacent lines.
  2. [Section 3.2] The definition of the beam solid angle, Ω = 1.13 × Θ^2, should specify that Θ is the geometric mean of the beam major and minor FWHM axes; currently 'geometric mean' is mentioned only in the text and not in the equation itself.
  3. [Section 4.2] There is a typo: '2-dimentional' should be 'two-dimensional'.
  4. [Section 4.1] The statement that MM2 and MM3 are 'almost transitionally identical' is somewhat contradicted by Table 4, which lists 7 lines for MM2 and 8 lines for MM3 with different species; the wording could be softened to 'similar line richness'.
  5. [Section 3.2] The adopted near kinematic distance of 2.8 kpc is justified by a single reference (Reid et al. 2014), but the difference from the previously used 2.5 kpc (Csengeri et al. 2017) is not discussed; since masses scale as D^2, this choice is a significant systematic and should be explicitly acknowledged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central measurements come from new ALMA data and standard formulae, and the Tex-to-Td adoption is a transparent assumption, not a renamed prediction.

full rationale

G328.24-0.55 is an observational study based on archival ALMA and MeerKAT data; its quantitative results (continuum fluxes, line identifications, excitation temperatures, dust masses, column densities, outflow sizes and timescales) are obtained by applying standard, stated formulae (Eqs. 1-5) to new imaging and spectra, not by fitting a model to the target conclusion. The only fitted quantity used as an input elsewhere is the CH3OH excitation temperature, which is explicitly adopted as the dust temperature in Eq. (1); this is a transparent physical assumption, not a renaming of the output as a prediction, and the mass calculation is not equivalent to the rotational-diagram fit by construction. The interpretation of the CH3OH first-moment gradient as a rotating envelope is an inference supported by literature comparisons; it is not definitionally identical to the data, and the paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or a self-citation chain to force it. The self-citations (Chibueze et al. 2017, 2025; Ugwu et al. 2023) appear only in lists of prior examples and do not carry the load of the argument. No step reduces an equation to itself or presents a fitted parameter as an independent prediction, so there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central physical quantities (masses, column densities, linear sizes) rest on several adopted or fitted parameters: dust temperatures (measured for MM1a/b/c, assumed for MM2/3), a dust opacity, a gas-to-dust ratio, a kinematic distance, and an outflow inclination. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Dust temperature of MM1a/MM1b/MM1c = 183 K, 168 K, 110 K
    Derived from LTE rotational diagram of CH3OH lines (Section 3.2, Figure 3); used as T_d in the dust mass and column density equations (Eq. 1 and 2).
  • Assumed dust temperature of MM2/MM3 = 20 K
    Since MM2 and MM3 lack multiple CH3OH lines, a dust temperature of 20 K is assumed, citing Wu et al. (2006) and Lu et al. (2014); this directly sets the masses and column densities of these two cores.
  • Kinematic distance = 2.8 kpc
    Obtained from VLSR of minus 42.6 km/s (from CH3OH 10_2,8 minus 9_3,7) and the Reid et al. (2014) rotation model (Section 3.2). All linear sizes, masses, and outflow scales depend on this distance.
  • Outflow inclination = 46 degrees
    Stated in Section 4.3 for computing outflow lobe sizes and dynamical timescale; the measurement or estimation method is not described.
  • Dust opacity at 230 GHz = 0.19 cm^2/g
    Adopted from Weingartner & Draine (2001) in Eq. 1; a standard assumption but a direct scaling factor for all dust masses.
  • Gas-to-dust ratio = 100
    Adopted standard value in Eq. 2 for column density and mass; a direct scaling factor.
  • Electron temperature of HII region = 6343 K
    Adopted from Khan et al. (2022) in the ionizing photon rate estimate (Eq. 3 and 4); sets the spectral type conclusion (B1 III).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LTE and optically thin CH3OH emission for rotational diagram analysis
    Rotational diagrams (Section 3.2, Figure 3) follow Goldsmith & Langer (1999) and assume LTE and optically thin lines to derive Tex.
  • domain assumption Dust continuum is optically thin at 1.3 mm
    Mass and column density equations (Eq. 1, 2) use the optically thin dust emission formula of Hildebrand (1983).
  • domain assumption CH3OH excitation temperature equals the dust temperature
    Tex from CH3OH is used as T_d for MM1a/b/c in Eq. 1 and 2, implicitly assuming gas and dust are thermally coupled.
  • domain assumption Galactic rotation curve model of Reid et al. (2014)
    The kinematic distance of 2.8 kpc is derived using VLSR and this model (Section 3.2); an incorrect distance scales all physical sizes and masses.
  • standard math Spectral line identifications from CDMS and JPL databases are correct
    Line rest frequencies and Einstein A coefficients are taken from CDMS and JPL catalogs (Section 2.2); misidentification would affect rotation diagrams and line counts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physical properties and gas kinematics of massive star forming region G328.24$-$0.55." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R47GKYSJ

@misc{pith2026250501582,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physical properties and gas kinematics of massive star forming region G328.24$-$0.55},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R47GKYSJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01582}
}
abstract

This study presents the results of ALMA band 6 archival data of G328.24$-$0.55, with the aim to pin down the physical and kinematic properties of young stellar objects (YSOs) in G328.24$-$0.55 star forming region. The dust continuum image reveals 5 protostellar objects (MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2 and MM3), with MM1a dominating the region. The dust continuum peaks do not coincide with the strongest radio continuum peak previously detected in the region in a MeerKAT observation, but coincide with the weaker MeerKAT peak. The dust continuum objects are associated with faint unresolved infrared emission. We detected 70, 49, 26, 7 and 8 molecular transitions toward MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2 and MM3, respectively. This variation in the number of detected molecular transitions supports different excitation conditions in these objects. The excitation temperatures estimated toward MM1a, MM1b and MM1c are $\sim$ 183, 168 and 110\,K, respectively. MM2 and MM3 lack multiple transitions of molecular lines to determine their excitation temperatures. The masses of MM1a, MM1b, MM1c, MM2 and MM3 were calculated to be 23.2, 16.1, 12.0, 9.8 and 14.9$M_{\odot}$, respectively. The velocity gradient of CH$_{3}$OH ($10_{2,8}-9_{3,7}$) emission traces a rotating structure, probably an envelope of gas around MM1a. Bipolar outflow traced by CO emission is seen towards MM1a. The properties of MM1a clearly point to the existence of a massive protostellar object that is still undergoing accretion and outflow in its early formative stage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01582 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 𝐿𝑒 𝑓 𝑡: Composite image of G328.24−0.55. 𝑅𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡: Zoom-in of G328.24−0.55 composite image. The background represents the 8 𝜇m Spitzer image of infrared emission (Benjamin et al. 2003). The overlaid cyan contours at levels = [0.6, 0.8, 0.9, 1.7, 2.5, 3.3, 3.7, 4.9, 6.2, 7.4] mJy beam−1 indicates the MeerKAT 1.28 GHz image of free-free emission (Goedhart et al. 2024) while white contours at levels = [6.2, 9.3, 12.4, 15.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. ALMA band 6 spectra for each dust continuum objects. Panels (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) are for MM1a ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rotational diagram analysis of CH3OH for (a) MM1a, (b) MM1b and (c) MM1c. The rotational temperature (in units of K), column density (log N; in units of cm−2 ) and correlation coefficient derived from the analysis are stated in the upper right corner. The error bars in (a) and (b) are very small ∼ 0.02. MNRAS 000, 1–15 (0000) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The CO spectrum extracted within a diameter of 0. ′′7 around the continuum peak of MM1a. The velocity range (−51.8 to −46.4 kms−1 ) of the blue-shifted peak is represented by the blue dashed lines, while the velocity range (−36.2 to −27.3 kms−1 ) of the red-shifted pea…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CH3OH (102,8 − 93,7) line: (a) integrated intensity map calculated between a velocity range of −52.5 and −29.8 kms−1 , (b) spectrum extracted within a diameter of 0. ′′52 around MM1a continuum peak, (c) velocity field map zoomed in between −45.2 and −35.1 kms−1 for cla…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bipolar outflow traced by CO emission. The blue and red contours that represent the blue-shifted (−51.8 to −46.4 kms−1 ) and red-shifted (−36.2 to −27.3 kms−1 ) emission, respectively, are overlaid on a gray scale ALMA continuum image. The black ellipse shown in the le…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376696 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..953B 115, 953

    Benjamin R. A., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376696 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..953B 115, 953

    doi:10.1086/376696 2003

  2. [2]

    M., Motte F., Sridharan T

    Beuther H., Schilke P., Menten K. M., Motte F., Sridharan T. K., Wyrowski F., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566..945B 566, 945

    doi:10.1086/338334 2002

  3. [3]

    B., McKee C

    Beuther H., Churchwell E. B., McKee C. F., Tan J. C., 2007, in Reipurth B., Jewitt D., Keil K., eds, Protostars and Planets V. p. 165 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0602012 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0602012

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0602012 2007

  4. [4]

    G., Barr A

    B gelund E. G., Barr A. G., Taquet V., Ligterink N. F. W., Persson M. V., Hogerheijde M. R., van Dishoeck E. F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A...2B 628, A2

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834527 2019

  5. [5]

    L., Caswell J

    Breen S. L., Caswell J. L., Ellingsen S. P., Phillips C. J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16791.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.1487B 406, 1487

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    L., Ellingsen S

    Breen S. L., Ellingsen S. P., Contreras Y., Green J. A., Caswell J. L., Stevens J. B., Dawson J. R., Voronkov M. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435..524B 435, 524

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1315 2013

  7. [7]

    S., 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts

    Briggs D. S., 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 112.02

    1995

  8. [8]

    L., Hunter T

    Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Cyganowski C. J., Indebetouw R., Beuther H., Menten K. M., Thorwirth S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707....1B 707, 1

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/1/1 2009

Show all 97 references
  1. [10]

    L., Haynes R

    Caswell J. L., Haynes R. F., Goss W. M., 1980, @doi [Australian Journal of Physics] 10.1071/PH800639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980AuJPh..33..639C 33, 639

    1980 doi

  2. [11]

    L., Gardner F

    Caswell J. L., Gardner F. F., Norris R. P., Wellington K. J., McCutcheon W. H., Peng R. S., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/260.2.425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.260..425C 260, 425

    1993 doi

  3. [12]

    O., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...59C 836, 59

    Chibueze J. O., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...59C 836, 59

    2017 doi

  4. [13]

    O., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539..145C 539, 145

    Chibueze J. O., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539..145C 539, 145

    2025 doi

  5. [14]

    Cooper H. D. B., 2013, PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK

    2013

  6. [15]

    D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PASP..120..439C 120, 439

    Cotton W. D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PASP..120..439C 120, 439

    2008 doi

  7. [16]

    Csengeri T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...600L..10C 600, L10

    2017 doi

  8. [17]

    M., Bouscasse L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A..57C 632, A57

    Csengeri T., Belloche A., Bontemps S., Wyrowski F., Menten K. M., Bouscasse L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A..57C 632, A57

    2019 doi

  9. [18]

    L., Cyganowski C

    Cunningham N., Lumsden S. L., Cyganowski C. J., Maud L. T., Purcell C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.1742C 458, 1742

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    J., Brogan C

    Cyganowski C. J., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Churchwell E., Zhang Q., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...729..124C 729, 124

    2011 doi

  11. [20]

    J., Brogan C

    Cyganowski C. J., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Zhang Q., Friesen R. K., Indebetouw R., Chandler C. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/760/2/L20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760L..20C 760, L20

    2012 doi

  12. [21]

    Di Francesco J., Evans N. J. I., Caselli P., Myers P. C., Shirley Y., Aikawa Y., Tafalla M., 2007, in Reipurth B., Jewitt D., Keil K., eds, Protostars and Planets V. p. 17 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0602379 )

    2007 arXiv

  13. [22]

    P., von Bibra M

    Ellingsen S. P., von Bibra M. L., McCulloch P. M., Norris R. P., Deshpande A. A., Phillips C. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/280.2.378 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.280..378E 280, 378

    1996 doi

  14. [23]

    P., Schlemmer S., Schilke P., Stutzki J., M \"u ller H

    Endres C. P., Schlemmer S., Schilke P., Stutzki J., M \"u ller H. S. P., 2016, @doi [Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy] 10.1016/j.jms.2016.03.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016JMoSp.327...95E 327, 95

    2016 doi

  15. [24]

    Fujisawa K., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psu015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASJ...66...31F 66, 31

    2014 doi

  16. [25]

    L., Henning T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322541 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..97G 563, A97

    Gerner T., Beuther H., Semenov D., Linz H., Vasyunina T., Bihr S., Shirley Y. L., Henning T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322541 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..97G 563, A97

    2014 doi

  17. [26]

    L., Beuther H., Semenov D., Linz H., Albertsson T., Henning T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A..80G 579, A80

    Gerner T., Shirley Y. L., Beuther H., Semenov D., Linz H., Albertsson T., Henning T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A..80G 579, A80

    2015 doi

  18. [27]

    Gieser C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A..66G 648, A66

    2021 doi

  19. [28]

    J., van der Walt D

    Goedhart S., Gaylard M. J., van der Walt D. J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08340.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.355..553G 355, 553

    2004

  20. [29]

    J., van der Walt D

    Goedhart S., Gaylard M. J., van der Walt D. J., 2007, in Chapman J. M., Baan W. A., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 242, Astrophysical Masers and their Environments. pp 97--101 ( @eprint arXiv 0711.1089 ), @doi 10.1017/S174392130701263X

    2007 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Goedhart S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531..649G 531, 649

    2024 doi

  22. [31]

    F., Langer W

    Goldsmith P. F., Langer W. D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...517..209G 517, 209

    1999 doi

  23. [32]

    F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..427H 47, 427

    Herbst E., van Dishoeck E. F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..427H 47, 427

    2009 doi

  24. [33]

    H., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983QJRAS..24..267H 24, 267

    Hildebrand R. H., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983QJRAS..24..267H 24, 267

    1983

  25. [34]

    A., 1974, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974A&AS...15..417H 15, 417

    H \"o gbom J. A., 1974, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974A&AS...15..417H 15, 417

    1974

  26. [35]

    M., Wu Y., Bartkiewicz A., Rygl K., Reid M

    Hu B., Menten K. M., Wu Y., Bartkiewicz A., Rygl K., Reid M. J., Urquhart J. S., Zheng X., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833...18H 833, 18

    2016 doi

  27. [36]

    R., Brogan C

    Hunter T. R., Brogan C. L., Cyganowski C. J., Young K. H., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788..187H 788, 187

    2014 doi

  28. [37]

    D., Cyganowski C

    Ilee J. D., Cyganowski C. J., Nazari P., Hunter T. R., Brogan C. L., Forgan D. H., Zhang Q., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1912 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.4386I 462, 4386

    2016 doi

  29. [38]

    G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813L..19J 813, L19

    Johnston K. G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813L..19J 813, L19

    2015 doi

  30. [39]

    Khan S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A.140K 664, A140

    2022 doi

  31. [40]

    Kim J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896..127K 896, 127

    2020 doi

  32. [41]

    Knowles K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A..56K 657, A56

    2022 doi

  33. [42]

    W., Turner N

    Kuiper R., Yorke H. W., Turner N. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/86 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...86K 800, 86

    2015 doi

  34. [43]

    J., Yorke H

    Kuiper R., Turner N. J., Yorke H. W., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...40K 832, 40

    2016 doi

  35. [44]

    Li Y., Xu Y., Sun Y., Yan Q.-Z., Ma Y., Yang J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab1e55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..242...19L 242, 19

    2019 doi

  36. [45]

    Liu T., Wu Y., Wu J., Qin S.-L., Zhang H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1335L 436, 1335

    2013 doi

  37. [46]

    Liu T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8d73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...849...25L 849, 25

    2017 doi

  38. [47]

    A., Zapata L

    L \'o pez-V \'a zquez J. A., Zapata L. A., Lee C.-F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acb439 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944...63L 944, 63

    2023 doi

  39. [48]

    B., Wang J., Gu Q., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790...84L 790, 84

    Lu X., Zhang Q., Liu H. B., Wang J., Gu Q., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790...84L 790, 84

    2014 doi

  40. [49]

    Manna A., Pal S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-023-04202-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Ap&SS.368...44M 368, 44

    2023 doi

  41. [50]

    L., Vermeij R., van der Hulst J

    Mart \' n-Hern \'a ndez N. L., Vermeij R., van der Hulst J. M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...433..205M 433, 205

    2005 doi

  42. [51]

    M., Rodr \' guez-Franco A., Rico-Villas F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.159M 631, A159

    Mart \' n S., Mart \' n-Pintado J., Blanco-S \'a nchez C., Rivilla V. M., Rodr \' guez-Franco A., Rico-Villas F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.159M 631, A159

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    N., Sakurai Y., Hosokawa T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx893 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.1026M 470, 1026

    Matsushita Y., Machida M. N., Sakurai Y., Hosokawa T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx893 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.1026M 470, 1026

    2017 doi

  44. [53]

    Mauch T., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d2d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...888...61M 888, 61

    2020 doi

  45. [54]

    T., Moore T

    Maud L. T., Moore T. J. T., Lumsden S. L., Mottram J. C., Urquhart J. S., Hoare M. G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453..645M 453, 645

    2015 doi

  46. [55]

    F., Klaassen P

    McLeod A. F., Klaassen P. D., Reiter M., Henshaw J., Kuiper R., Ginsburg A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06790-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.625...55M 625, 55

    2024 doi

  47. [56]

    P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K., 2007, in Shaw R

    McMullin J. P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K., 2007, in Shaw R. A., Hill F., Bell D. J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI. p. 127

    2007

  48. [57]

    Motte F., Bontemps S., Louvet F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56...41M 56, 41

    2018 doi

  49. [58]

    M \"u ller H. S. P., Thorwirth S., Roth D. A., Winnewisser G., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...370L..49M 370, L49

    2001 doi

  50. [59]

    u ller H. S. P., Schl \

    M \"u ller H. S. P., Schl \"o der F., Stutzki J., Winnewisser G., 2005, @doi [Journal of Molecular Structure] 10.1016/j.molstruc.2005.01.027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005JMoSt.742..215M 742, 215

    2005 doi

  51. [60]

    P., Whiteoak J

    Norris R. P., Whiteoak J. B., Caswell J. L., Wieringa M. H., Gough R. G., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412..222N 412, 222

    1993 doi

  52. [61]

    Panagia N., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973AJ.....78..929P 78, 929

    1973 doi

  53. [62]

    D., Momjian E., Xu Y., Menten K

    Pandian J. D., Momjian E., Xu Y., Menten K. M., Goldsmith P. F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730...55P 730, 55

    2011 doi

  54. [63]

    S., Dullemond C

    Peters T., Mac Low M.-M., Banerjee R., Klessen R. S., Dullemond C. P., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/831 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...719..831P 719, 831

    2010 doi

  55. [64]

    J., Norris R

    Phillips C. J., Norris R. P., Ellingsen S. P., McCulloch P. M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01979.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.300.1131P 300, 1131

    1998

  56. [65]

    M., Poynter R

    Pickett H. M., Poynter R. L., Cohen E. A., Delitsky M. L., Pearson J. C., M \"u ller H. S. P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S0022-4073(98)00091-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998JQSRT..60..883P 60, 883

    1998 doi

  57. [66]

    J., Menten K

    Pillai T., Wyrowski F., Carey S. J., Menten K. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...450..569P 450, 569

    2006 doi

  58. [67]

    J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...783..130R 783, 130

    Reid M. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...783..130R 783, 130

    2014 doi

  59. [68]

    Rong J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2406 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.1428R 455, 1428

    2016 doi

  60. [69]

    L., Krumholz M

    Rosen A. L., Krumholz M. R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9abf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160...78R 160, 78

    2020 doi

  61. [70]

    L., Offner S

    Rosen A. L., Offner S. S. R., Sadavoy S. I., Bhandare A., V \'a zquez-Semadeni E., Ginsburg A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-020-00688-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020SSRv..216...62R 216, 62

    2020 doi

  62. [71]

    N., Ohashi N., Aso Y., Maury A

    Sai J., Yen H.-W., Machida M. N., Ohashi N., Aso Y., Maury A. J., Maret S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad34b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966..192S 966, 192

    2024 doi

  63. [72]

    Sanna A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833411 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...623A..77S 623, A77

    2019 doi

  64. [73]

    pp 227--235 ( @eprint arXiv 1604.01156 ), @doi 10.1051/eas/1575046

    Schilke P., 2015, in EAS Publications Series. pp 227--235 ( @eprint arXiv 1604.01156 ), @doi 10.1051/eas/1575046

    2015 arXiv

  65. [74]

    T., Hiner M

    Schindelin J., Rueden C. T., Hiner M. C., Eliceiri K. W., 2015, Molecular reproduction and development, 82, 518

    2015

  66. [75]

    A., Rasband W

    Schneider C. A., Rasband W. S., Eliceiri K. W., 2012, Nature methods, 9, 671

    2012

  67. [76]

    I., Dzura A

    Slysh V. I., Dzura A. M., Val'tts I. E., Gerard E., 1994, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&AS..106...87S 106, 87

    1994

  68. [77]

    K., Beuther H., Schilke P., Menten K

    Sridharan T. K., Beuther H., Schilke P., Menten K. M., Wyrowski F., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338332 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566..931S 566, 931

    2002 doi

  69. [78]

    C., Beltr \'a n M

    Tan J. C., Beltr \'a n M. T., Caselli P., Fontani F., Fuente A., Krumholz M. R., McKee C. F., Stolte A., 2014, in Beuther H., Klessen R. S., Dullemond C. P., Henning T., eds, Protostars and Planets VI. pp 149--172 ( @eprint arXiv 1402.0919 ), @doi 10.2458/azu_uapress_978081653...

    2014 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Tanabe Y., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psz100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASJ...71S...8T 71, S8

    2019 doi

  71. [80]

    J., Chibueze J

    Ugwu C. J., Chibueze J. O., Morgan J., Csengeri T., Chukwude A. E., van der Walt D. J., Alhassan J. A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad376 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.4747U 520, 4747

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    J., Kristensen L

    Van Der Walt S. J., Kristensen L. E., J rgensen J. K., Calcutt H., Manigand S., el Akel M., Garrod R. T., Qiu K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...655A..86V 655, A86

    2021 doi

  73. [82]

    J., Kristensen L

    Van Der Walt S. J., Kristensen L. E., Calcutt H., J rgensen J. K., Garrod R. T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.127V 677, A127

    2023 doi

  74. [83]

    F., Blake G

    Van Dishoeck E. F., Blake G. A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.317 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..317V 36, 317

    1998 doi

  75. [84]

    C., Draine B

    Weingartner J. C., Draine B. T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...548..296W 548, 296

    2001 doi

  76. [85]

    M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509..748W 509, 748

    Williams G. M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509..748W 509, 748

    2022 doi

  77. [86]

    M., Cyganowski C

    Williams G. M., Cyganowski C. J., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Nazari P., Smith R. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.6146W 525, 6146

    2023 doi

  78. [87]

    Wu Y., Zhang Q., Yu W., Miller M., Mao R., Sun K., Wang Y., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...450..607W 450, 607

    2006 doi

  79. [88]

    arXiv:2407.21518

    Yamato Y., et al., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240721518Y p. arXiv:2407.21518

    2024 arXiv

  80. [89]

    P., Lu D., Ju B., Li Y., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6ff3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..231...20Y 231, 20

    Yang W., Xu Y., Chen X., Ellingsen S. P., Lu D., Ju B., Li Y., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6ff3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..231...20Y 231, 20

    2017 doi

  81. [90]

    Zhang Q., Wang K., Lu X., Jim \'e nez-Serra I., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804..141Z 804, 141

    2015 doi

  82. [91]

    W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ARA&A..45..481Z 45, 481

    Zinnecker H., Yorke H. W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ARA&A..45..481Z 45, 481

    2007 arXiv

  83. [92]

    M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444..566D 444, 566

    de Villiers H. M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444..566D 444, 566

    2014 doi

  84. [93]

    van der Tak F. F. S., van Dishoeck E. F., Evans II N. J., Blake G. A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309011 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...537..283V 537, 283

    2000 doi

  85. [94]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  86. [95]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  87. [96]

    N., 2013, Journal of Improbable Astronomy, 1, 1

    Author A. N., 2013, Journal of Improbable Astronomy, 1, 1

    2013

  88. [97]

    D., 2015, Journal of Interesting Stuff, 17, 198

    Jones C. D., 2015, Journal of Interesting Stuff, 17, 198

    2015

  89. [98]

    B., 2014, The Example Journal, 12, 345 (Paper I)

    Smith A. B., 2014, The Example Journal, 12, 345 (Paper I)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.