Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Plasmonic structure integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with BSCCO stripes

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A numerically optimized nanocavity array raises BSCCO absorptance to 86.6% at 1550 nm, more than ten times a plain optical cavity.

desk verdict A self-consistent numerical design study that transfers the authors' NbN nanocavity program to BSCCO and predicts high absorptance, but the material-data sensitivity is unquantified and there is no experimental backing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09630 v2 pith:R4GUTQGY submitted 2024-11-14 physics.optics

András Szenes , László Pothorcki , Balázs Bánhelyi , Mária Csete This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords superconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectorBSCCOplasmonicnanocavityarrayabsorptanceoptimization1550nmfinite-elementsimulationcupratesuperconductordetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses numerical optimization to design plasmonic nanocavity arrays that concentrate light into superconducting BSCCO stripes in a single-photon detector. At 1550 nm and normal incidence, the optimized nanocavity-array design absorbs 86.6% of incident light in the BSCCO, and a variant with empty trenches absorbs 83.3%, both more than an order of magnitude better than the 7.0% absorbed by a meandered BSCCO stripe in a simple optical cavity. The paper argues these geometries make BSCCO-based detectors practical at telecommunication wavelengths while keeping the large periods that allow fast electrical response. If the simulated absorption is realized in fabricated devices, it would remove a major efficiency bottleneck for higher-temperature superconducting single-photon detectors.

What carries the argument

The central object is a periodic nanocavity array: a 15 nm BSCCO nanowire stripe covered by 20 nm hBN, embedded in an HSQ-filled optical cavity closed by a 60 nm gold reflector, with vertical gold walls dividing the cavity along the wire. In the NCAI variant the gold segments run the full wire-to-wire distance; in the NCTAI variant the wall width is varied to leave empty trenches between filled cavities. The mechanism is the λ/4 and 3λ/4 standing-wave resonances of the gold-walled cavities, which concentrate the incident field into the BSCCO stripe and minimize competitive absorption in the gold. The authors verify the resonance orders with a standard retrieval of effective cavity length and support the interpretation with near-field maps and eigenmode calculations.

What would settle it

Fabricate the optimized NCAI-SNSPD geometry, illuminate at 1550 nm normal incidence, and measure the power absorbed in the BSCCO stripe; if it falls far below 86.6% (for instance near the 7.0% reference), the assumed thin-film optical constants or the fabricated geometry are wrong. A quicker check is spectroscopic ellipsometry of a 15 nm BSCCO film in hBN to compare its measured permittivity with the imported values used here.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that replacing a plain optical cavity with a gold-walled nanocavity array raises BSCCO absorptance from 7.0% to 86.6% in the NCAI-SNSPD and to 83.3% in the NCTAI-SNSPD at 1550 nm, normal incidence. Both optimized devices operate through first (λ/4) and third (3λ/4) cavity resonances; the lower-order mode gives the higher absorptance and less competitive gold absorption. The NCAI design reaches its peak with a wider BSCCO filling factor, while the NCTAI design achieves nearly the same absorptance with a larger period and smaller filling factor, which reduces kinetic inductance and should speed up the detector. The simulations also map out the angular and spectral response, showing a broad passband at normal incidence and a plasmonic Brewster-angle absorption feature at larger tilts.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted absorptance depends on the accuracy of the optical constants and anisotropy assumed for the 15 nm BSCCO and 20 nm hBN films, and on the assumption that the optimized gold-walled geometry can actually be fabricated at those dimensions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the simulated 86.6% absorptance, the NCAI design absorbs more than twelve times as much 1550 nm light as the 7.0% reference, which would directly raise the detection efficiency ceiling for BSCCO-based SNSPDs.
  • The NCTAI design reaches 83.3% absorptance while using a larger period and smaller filling factor, which the paper links to lower kinetic inductance and therefore faster reset and counting rates.
  • Both optimized geometries operate in the telecom band, matching the wavelength at which BSCCO detectors have already demonstrated single-photon sensitivity at 20-25 K.
  • The λ/4 cavity mode outperforms the 3λ/4 mode in absorptance, gold loss, and angular tolerance, so the lower-order resonance is the practical operating point for a fast detector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A concrete next step would be to fabricate the optimized NCAI geometry using the helium-ion-exposure method and measure system detection efficiency at 1550 nm; the gap between simulated 86.6% absorption and measured efficiency would isolate fabrication and optical-constant errors.
  • The same cavity design could be retuned to other wavelengths by scaling the cavity height and period, since the paper identifies the resonances as quarter-wave modes of the gold-walled cavities.
  • The dispersion diagrams hint at an angular-tuning strategy: tilting the device by several degrees moves the operating point along the passband, which could be used to fine-tune the wavelength without redesigning the geometry.
  • Repeating the optimization with measured thin-film permittivity for actual grown BSCCO/hBN stacks would give fabrication-realistic absorptance targets, since the current results hinge on imported optical constants.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript numerically optimizes two plasmonic-structure-integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detector designs based on BSCCO stripes, aiming to maximize BSCCO absorptance at 1550 nm and normal incidence. The authors use FEM (COMSOL) with tabulated optical constants, optimize the geometry (cavity height, period, wire width, trench dimensions) using a two-step Monte Carlo plus local search, and report absorptances of 86.6% for the NCAI design and 83.3% for the NCTAI design, both more than an order of magnitude above a meandered-BSCCO-in-optical-cavity reference (7.0%). The performance is attributed to λ/4 and 3λ/4 nanocavity resonances, supported by near-field maps, retrieval-method effective-index checks, and dispersion/eigenmode analyses.

Significance. If the numerical predictions hold, the designs represent a significant absorptance enhancement for high-Tc superconductor SNSPDs at telecom wavelengths, with potential for faster operation due to larger periods. The paper's strengths include a systematic optimization of two geometries, comparison against multiple baselines, and independent validation of the resonance interpretation via retrieval and eigenmode calculations. However, the central quantitative claims rest on literature optical constants without a sensitivity analysis, and the optimized geometry parameters are not reported; these issues currently limit the practical impact.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II (Methods) and Section III.B (Figures 2-3)] The absorptance values (86.6% and 83.3%) are computed using BSCCO and hBN permittivity tensors imported from Refs. [26] and [27]. The manuscript provides no sensitivity analysis with respect to these constants, even though the optimized resonances are narrow, especially for the 3λ/4 modes. A small shift in the real part of the permittivity or an uncertainty in film thickness (15 nm BSCCO, 20 nm hBN) can detune the resonance away from 1550 nm and substantially reduce the reported absorptance. Since the paper's central claim is a quantitative improvement, the authors should include a tolerance/sensitivity study (e.g., perturbing n and k by a few percent, or varying cavity height and wire width within fabrication tolerances) to show the robustness of the optimized values.
  2. [Section II and Section III.B] The optimized geometric parameters (period, cavity height, wire width, deflector/trench widths) are never listed in the main text. The manuscript refers only to "mode 1" and "mode 2" and to Figures 2-3, but the actual dimensions are absent. For a numerical optimization study, the final geometry must be reported to allow reproduction and use by other researchers. Please provide a table or explicit values for both NCAI and NCTAI, for both resonant modes.
  3. [Section III.A] The baseline meandered BSCCO pattern in an optical cavity is not optimized; the cavity height is fixed at 225 nm, which was optimized for the continuous slab configuration (Section III.A). The claim of "more than an order of magnitude" improvement (7.0% to 86.6%) is relative to this particular meander-in-cavity setup. If the meander baseline were itself optimized (e.g., by tuning the cavity height for the meander geometry), the improvement factor could be lower. The authors should either re-optimize the meander baseline or explicitly justify why the 225 nm cavity is an appropriate standard of comparison.
  4. [Section II (Methods) and Section III.B] The FEM simulations are the sole evidence for the quantitative results, and the difference between NCAI (86.6%) and NCTAI (83.3%) is only 3.3 percentage points, which could be comparable to numerical discretization error. No mesh-convergence analysis is reported. The authors should provide a mesh-convergence study (e.g., an asymptotic error estimate) to demonstrate that the absorptance values and the ordering of designs are robust with respect to the discretization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General structure] The section numbering skips from III to V; there is no Section IV. Please renumber or insert a missing section.
  2. [Section II] The term "p-to-S configuration" is not explicitly defined. Please clarify what this configuration means and how it relates to the polarization angle and the orientation of the nanowires.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The caption states "indicating the parameters varied during optimization" but does not define all the symbols used in the schematic. Please define every labeled parameter (e.g., wire width, period, cavity height, deflector width) in the caption or in the text.
  4. [Section III.B] The sentence "Standard retrieval calculations [29] indicate..." does not specify what simulated data were used as input to the retrieval. Please state that the retrieval was applied to the simulated S-parameters or field data from the FEM model.
  5. [Reference [27]] Reference [27] concerns monolayer-hBN/metal heterostructures, but the simulation uses a 20 nm hBN film. Please comment on the transferability of these optical constants to the thickness used here and on any possible thickness dependence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the optimized absorptance is the explicit objective of the FEM optimization, and the benchmark comparison is an independent simulation.

full rationale

The central quantitative results (86.6% and 83.3% BSCCO absorptance at 1550 nm and normal incidence) are values of the optimization objective at the geometry found by full-wave FEM in COMSOL. Reporting an optimized objective is not circular because the inputs are Maxwell's equations, imported material tensors, geometry bounds, and the algorithm; the output value is not contained in those inputs. The comparison with the 7.0% meandered-pattern-in-cavity baseline is a separate simulation using the same material data, so the claimed order-of-magnitude improvement is a computed result rather than a fitted identity. The quarter-wave and 3-lambda/4 mode assignments are interpretive and are checked by near-field maps, standard retrieval [29], and eigenmode calculations [32]; even if the retrieval-based mode label were partly tautological, it is not load-bearing for the absorptance claims. The paper's main self-reliance is the inheritance of the NCAI/NCTAI composition ansatz from the authors' own prior work [20]-[22]; this is a transparent design starting point, and the BSCCO-specific optimum and its comparison are computed independently, so the self-citation does not force the result. Uncertainty in the imported bulk/room-temperature BSCCO and hBN optical constants is a correctness risk rather than a circularity: it could shift the narrow resonances, but it does not make the derivation self-referential. No equation is defined in terms of the claimed result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The predictions rest on Maxwell solvers, literature optical constants, and an optimized geometry whose exact parameters are not tabulated; no experimental data or uncertainty propagation accompanies the numbers.

free parameters (4)
  • HSQ cavity height = optimized within 10-800 nm, exact value not tabulated
    Primary geometric variable; varied to reach lambda/4 and 3*lambda/4 resonances; the claimed absorptance is conditional on the selected value.
  • BSCCO wire width = optimized, exact value not tabulated
    Wire width sets filling factor and near-field concentration; part of the optimization objective.
  • NCAI period (wire-to-wire distance) = optimized within 800-1200 nm, exact value not tabulated
    Determines grating coupling and kinetic inductance; optimized to maximize absorptance.
  • NCTAI period and deflector/trench width = optimized, exact value not tabulated
    Additional degrees of freedom in NCTAI; creates the empty trench array and affects filling factor.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations solved with COMSOL RF module using tabulated material dispersions and Floquet boundary conditions accurately model the periodic infinite array.
    The entire absorptance calculation rests on this numerical solve; no analytic verification is supplied.
  • domain assumption BSCCO and hBN optical properties are accurately captured by the full permittivity tensor and bianisotropy models from refs [26,27] for 15 nm BSCCO and 20 nm hBN films.
    If the material constants differ in real fabricated films, the optimized absorptance values are not valid.
  • domain assumption The helium-ion patterned BSCCO flakes encapsulated in hBN can realize the simulated periodic geometries without additional optical losses or damage.
    The proposed device's feasibility relies on fabrication fidelity; cited experiments [12,13] demonstrated patterning, but not these exact plasmonic geometries.
  • domain assumption BSCCO absorptance is the relevant proxy for single-photon detection efficiency; hotspot formation and readout are not modeled.
    The paper optimizes absorptance, but detection efficiency also depends on current bias and hotspot dynamics; the claim is limited to absorptance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plasmonic structure integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with BSCCO stripes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R4GUTQGY

@misc{pith2026241109630,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plasmonic structure integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with BSCCO stripes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R4GUTQGY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09630}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) were integrated with plasmonic nanostructures to enhance the absorption efficiency of superconducting BSCCO stripes. A numerical investigation of optimized nanocavity array (NCAI) and nanocavity-trench-array (NCTAI) SNSPDs has revealed that more than one order of magnitude larger absorptance can be achieved at perpendicular incidence, when compared to the corresponding meandered BSCCO pattern in a resonant optical cavity. The SNSPDs were considerably improved either via first and third quarter cavity resonances, as evidenced by the near-field maps and validated by the standard retrieval method. Although, NCAI-SNSPD exhibits slightly larger absorptance, NCTAI-SNSPD remains competitive due to its larger period and significantly smaller filling factor, thereby allowing for quicker electric response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09630 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the unit cells of the inspected NCAI-SNSPD and NCTAI-SNSPD periodic structures, indicating the illumination by p-polarized light and the parameters varied during optimization. The superconducting material segment was a 15 nm thick BSCCO layer covered by a 20 nm hBN film, defined by their full permittivity tensor accounting for the thin films bianisotropy [26], [27] (Figure S1 in Supplementary Material).… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Optical response of optimized NCAI-SNSPD composition in p-to-S configuration. (a) spectrum and (b) polar angle dependence. Solid: mode 1 (smaller cavity height) dashed: mode 2 (larger cavity height). Time averaged near-field enhancement of NCAI-SNSPD optimized to resonate in the (c) mode 1 and (d) mode 2. The NCAI-SNSPD optimized to resonate in the λ/4 cavity mode exhibits a broad Lorentzian-resonance in absorptance… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Optical response of optimized NCTAI-SNSPD composition in p-to-S configuration. (a) spectrum and (b) polar angle dependence. Solid: mode 1 (smaller cavity height) dashed: mode 2 (larger cavity height). Time-averaged near-field enhancement of NCTAI-SNSPD optimized to resonate in the (c) mode 1 and (d) mode 2. C. Comparative study The absorptance spectrum and polar angle dependence of NCAI-SNSPD and NCTAI-SNSPD reveal … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dispersion diagram in absorption of (a) NCAI-SNSPD in mode 1, (b) NCAI-SNSPD in mode 2, (c) NCTAI-SNSPD in mode 1 and (d) NCTAI-SNSPD in mode 2 Comparing the optimized integrated devices, the NCAI-SNSPD exhibits larger BSCCO absorptance and smaller Au absorptance than …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Orientation-dependent Casimir force arising from highly anisotropic crystals: Application to Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ,

    M. B. Romanowsky and F. Capasso, “Orientation-dependent Casimir force arising from highly anisotropic crystals: Application to Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 78, no. 4, Oct. 2008, Art. no. 042110, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042110

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.042110 2008

  2. [27]

    Extremely Confined Acoustic Phonon Pol aritons in Monolayer -hBN/Metal Heterostructures for Strong Light–Matter Interactions,

    Z. Yuan, R. Che, P. Li, A. Y. Nikitin, R. Hillenbrand, and X. Zhang, “Extremely Confined Acoustic Phonon Pol aritons in Monolayer -hBN/Metal Heterostructures for Strong Light–Matter Interactions,” ACS Photonics, Sep. 2020, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 2610–2617, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00981

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00981 2020

  3. [1]

    A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6816, pp. 46–52, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1038/35051009

    doi:10.1038/35051009 2001

  4. [2]

    High-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling,

    H. Wang et al., “High-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 361–365, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.63

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.63 2017

  5. [3]

    Single -photon detectors for optical quantum information applications,

    R. H. Hadfield, “Single -photon detectors for optical quantum information applications,” Nat. Photonics , vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 696 –705, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.230

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 2009

  6. [4]

    Satellit e-relayed intercontinental quantum network,

    S. -K. Liao et al. , “Satellit e-relayed intercontinental quantum network,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 120, no. 3, Jan. 2018, Art. no. 030501, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.030501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.030501 2018

  7. [5]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications,

    C. M. Natarajan, M. G. Tanner, and R. H. Hadfield, “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 25, no. 6, Apr. 2012, Art. no. 063001, doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001

    doi:10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001 2012

  8. [6]

    Broadband waveguide-integrated superconducting single-photon detectors with high system detection efficiency,

    M. A. Wolff et al., “Broadband waveguide-integrated superconducting single-photon detectors with high system detection efficiency,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 118, no. 15, Apr. 2021, Art. no. 154004, doi: 10.1063/5.0046057

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0046057 2021

Show all 32 references
  1. [7]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm,

    D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and V. B. Verma, “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm,” Optica, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1649–1653, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.400751

    2020 doi

  2. [8]

    Detecting telecom single photons with 99.5% system detection efficiency and high time resolution,

    J. Chang et al., “Detecting telecom single photons with 99.5% system detection efficiency and high time resolution,” APL Photonics, vol. 6, no. 3, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 036114, doi: 10.1063/5.0039772

    2021 doi

  3. [9]

    Superconducting nanowire single -photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state -of-the-art, future developments, and applications,

    I. Esmaeil Zadeh et al. , “Superconducting nanowire single -photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state -of-the-art, future developments, and applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 118, no. 19, May 2021, Art. no. 190502, doi: 10.1063/5.0045990

    2021 doi

  4. [10]

    Observation of dark pulses in 10 nm thick YBCO nanostrips presenting hysteretic current voltage characteristics,

    M. Ejrnaes et al., “Observation of dark pulses in 10 nm thick YBCO nanostrips presenting hysteretic current voltage characteristics,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 30, no. 12, Nov. 2017, Art. no. 12LT02, doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/aa94b9

    2017 doi

  5. [11]

    Fabrication and electrical transport characterization of high qu ality underdoped YBa2Cu3O7−δ nanowires,

    E. An dersson, R. Arpaia, E. Trabaldo, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, “Fabrication and electrical transport characterization of high qu ality underdoped YBa2Cu3O7−δ nanowires,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, no. 6, Apr. 2020, Art. no. 064002, doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/ab807e

    2020 doi

  6. [12]

    Single -photon detection using high -temperature superconductors,

    I. Charaev et al. , “Single -photon detection using high -temperature superconductors,” Nat. Nanotechnol. , vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 343 –349, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41565-023-01325-2

    2023 doi

  7. [13]

    Two-dimensional cuprate nanodetector with single telecom photon sensitivity at T = 20 K,

    R. L. Merino et al., “Two-dimensional cuprate nanodetector with single telecom photon sensitivity at T = 20 K,” 2D Mater., vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2023, Art. no. 021001, doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/acb4a8

    2023 doi

  8. [14]

    Compactly packaged superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with an optical cavity for multichannel system,

    S. Miki, M. Takeda, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Compactly packaged superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with an optical cavity for multichannel system,” Opt. Express, vol. 17, no. 26, pp. 23557–23564, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1364/OE.17.023557

    2009 doi

  9. [15]

    Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency,

    F. Marsili et al. , “Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency,” Nat. Photonics , vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2 10–214, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.13

    2013 doi

  10. [16]

    Numerical method to optimize the polar-azimuthal orientation of infrared superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors,

    M. Csete, Á. Sipos, F. Najafi, X. Hu, and K. K. Berggren, “Numerical method to optimize the polar-azimuthal orientation of infrared superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors,” Appl. Opt., vol. 50, no. 31, pp. 5949–5956, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1364/AO.50.005949

    2011 doi

  11. [17]

    Optimized polar -azimuthal orientations for polarized light illumination of different superconducting nanowire single-photon detector designs,

    M. Csete, Á. Sipos, F. Najafi, and K. K. Berggren, “Optimized polar -azimuthal orientations for polarized light illumination of different superconducting nanowire single-photon detector designs,” J. Nanophotonics, vol. 6, no. 1, Nov. 2012, Art. no. 063523, doi: 10.1117/1.JNP.6.063523

    2012 doi

  12. [18]

    Impact of polar -azimuthal illumination angles on efficiency of nano -cavity-array integrated single -photon detectors,

    M. Csete, A. Szalai, Á. Sipos, and G. Szabó, “Impact of polar -azimuthal illumination angles on efficiency of nano -cavity-array integrated single -photon detectors,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 17065–17081, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1364/OE.20.017065

    2012 doi

  13. [19]

    Improvement of infrared single-photon detectors absorptance by integrated plasmonic structures,

    M. Csete, Á. Sipos, A. Szalai, F. Najafi, G. Szabó, and K. K. Berggren, “Improvement of infrared single-photon detectors absorptance by integrated plasmonic structures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 3, no. 1, Aug. 2013, Art. no. 2406, doi: 10.1038/srep02406

    2013 doi

  14. [20]

    Plasmonic Structure Integrated Single-Photon Detector Configurations to Improve Absorptance and Polarization Contrast,

    M. Csete, G. Szekeres, A. Szenes, A. Szalai, and G. Szabó, “Plasmonic Structure Integrated Single-Photon Detector Configurations to Improve Absorptance and Polarization Contrast,” Sensors, Feb. 2015, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 3513-3539, doi: 10.3390/s150203513

    2015 doi

  15. [21]

    Optimized Superconducting Nanowire Single Photon De tectors to Maximize Absorptance,

    M. Csete, G. Szekeres, A. Szenes, B. Banhelyi, T. Csendes, and G. Szabo, “Optimized Superconducting Nanowire Single Photon De tectors to Maximize Absorptance,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. B, vol. 65, pp. 81-108, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.2528/PIERB15090904

    2016 doi

  16. [22]

    Polarization Independent High Absorption Efficiency Single-Photon Detectors Based on Three-Dimensional Integrated Superconducting And Plasmonic Patterns,

    B. Tóth, A. Szenes, D. Maráczi, B. Bánhelyi, T. Csendes, and M. Csete, “Polarization Independent High Absorption Efficiency Single-Photon Detectors Based on Three-Dimensional Integrated Superconducting And Plasmonic Patterns,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. , vol. 26, no....

    2020

  17. [23]

    Kinetic-inductance-limited reset time of superconducting nanowire photon counters,

    A. J. Kerman et al., “Kinetic-inductance-limited reset time of superconducting nanowire photon counters,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 88, no. 11, Mar. 2006, Art. no. 111116, doi: 10.1063/1.2183810

    2006 doi

  18. [24]

    Optical Constants of the Noble Metals,

    P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical Constants of the Noble Metals,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4370 –4379, Dec. 1972, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370

    1972 doi

  19. [25]

    Interspecimen comparison of the refractive index of fused silica,

    I. H. Malitson, “Interspecimen comparison of the refractive index of fused silica,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. , vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1205 -1209, Oct. 1965, doi: 10.1364/JOSA.55.001205

    1965 doi

  20. [28]

    The GLOBAL optimization method revisited

    T. Csendes, L. Pál, J. O. H. Sendín, and J. R. Banga , “The GLOBAL optimization method revisited.” Optim Lett, Nov. 2007, vol. 2, pp. 445–454, doi: 10.1007/s11590-007-0072-3

    2007 doi

  21. [29]

    A Unique Extraction of Metamaterial Parameters Based on Kramers –Kronig Relationship,

    Z. Szabó, G. -H. Park, R. Hedge, and E. -P. Li, “A Unique Extraction of Metamaterial Parameters Based on Kramers –Kronig Relationship,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2646-2653, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2010.2065310

    2010

  22. [30]

    Experimental demonstration of plasmonic Brewster angle extraordinary transmission through extreme subwavelength slit array s in the microwave,

    N. Akozbek et al., “Experimental demonstration of plasmonic Brewster angle extraordinary transmission through extreme subwavelength slit array s in the microwave,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 85, no. 20, May 2012, Art. no. 205430, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205430

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    Matching and funneling light at the plas monic Brewster angle,

    C. Argyropoulos, G. D’Aguanno, N. Mattiucci, N. Akozbek, M. J. Bloemer, and A. Alù, “Matching and funneling light at the plas monic Brewster angle,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 85, no. 2, Jan. 2012, Art. no. 02430, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.024304

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    Quasinormal mode solvers for resonators with dispersive materials,

    P. Lalanne et al., “Quasinormal mode solvers for resonators with dispersive materials,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 686 -704, 1, April, 2019, doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.36.000686

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.