pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.12891 · v1 · pith:R544T6Q4new · submitted 2025-10-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Polarization dependency in Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering

Michelangelo Tagliavini , Fabian Wenzel , Maurits W. Haverkort This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords RIXSpolarization dependencetensor representationfundamental spectrapoint-group symmetryresponse functiondipole approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor representation of the RIXS response function separates experimental geometry from intrinsic material properties

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a tensor representation for the four-point response function that controls RIXS intensity. This allows separating the influence of light polarization and scattering geometry from the material's own excitations. In low-symmetry crystals using dipole processes, up to 81 linearly independent fundamental spectra become measurable by changing polarizations. Symmetry reduces the number of these independent components according to the point group. The framework also gives expressions for powder samples and Bragg spectrometer measurements to aid planning and interpretation.

Core claim

Employing a tensor representation of the 4-point response function that governs the RIXS intensity disentangles the experimental geometry from the intrinsic material properties. In dipole-dipole RIXS processes and low-symmetry crystals, up to 81 linearly independent fundamental spectra can be measured as a function of light polarization, while symmetry reduces this number. The approach systematically determines the number of fundamental spectra and expresses the RIXS tensor in terms of them, with validation through calculations for different point groups with and without magnetic field, plus derivations for powder and Bragg spectra.

What carries the argument

Tensor representation of the 4-point response function, decomposed by point-group symmetry into fundamental spectra whose linear combinations give the observed intensity for any geometry.

If this is right

  • For a specific experimental geometry the measured spectrum is a linear combination of the fundamental spectra.
  • The number of independent fundamental spectra is significantly reduced by crystal or molecular symmetry.
  • Calculations for various point group symmetries with and without applied magnetic field confirm the framework.
  • Expressions for powder spectra in momentum-independent processes are derived within the same tensor approach.
  • Spectra from Bragg spectrometers are also obtainable using the formalism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimenters could use polarization variation to extract the full set of fundamental spectra and thereby determine material properties independently of setup details.
  • The method might be extended to include quadrupole or other higher-order processes by increasing the tensor rank accordingly.
  • Similar tensor decompositions could apply to other resonant scattering techniques sharing the same symmetry constraints.
  • Optimizing experimental geometries to maximize information from the independent spectra becomes possible with this counting.

Load-bearing premise

The RIXS process is fully captured by a 4-point response function that admits a tensor decomposition with independent components strictly set by the point-group symmetry of the sample.

What would settle it

Finding more than 81 linearly independent spectra as a function of polarization in a low-symmetry crystal for dipole-dipole RIXS would show the tensor decomposition does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.12891 by Fabian Wenzel, Maurits W. Haverkort, Michelangelo Tagliavini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the RIXS experimen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Imaginary part of the 2p3/23d RIXS tensor for systems with (a) SO(3), (b) Oh, (c) D4h, and (d) D2h point group symmetry. Each tensor consists of 81 energy transfer over excitation energy intensity maps. Excitations energies are expressed relatively to the binding energy of Ni 2p1/2 states. A symmetric logarithmic color scale is used to plot the values, with a linear regime between -0.01 and 0.01. The tenso… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Imaginary part of the 2p3/23d RIXS tensor for systems with (a) SO(3), (b) Oh, (c) D4h, and (d) D2h point group symmetry in the presence of a small but finite external magnetic field Bext||z. Only the resulting single degenerate ground state is considered. Each tensor consists of 81 energy transfer over excitation energy intensity maps. Excitations energies are expressed relatively to the binding energy of … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic representation of a general RIXS ge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering (RIXS) is a well-established tool for probing excitations in a wide range of materials. The measured spectra strongly depend on the scattering geometry, via its influence on the polarization of the incoming and outgoing light. By employing a tensor representation of the 4-point response function that governs the RIXS intensity, we disentangle the experimental geometry from the intrinsic material properties. In dipole-dipole RIXS processes and low-symmetry crystals, up to 81 linearly independent fundamental spectra can be measured as a function of light polarization. However, for crystals or molecules with symmetry, the number of independent fundamental spectra that define the RIXS tensor is significantly reduced. This work presents a systematic framework for determining the number of fundamental spectra and expressing the RIXS tensor in terms of these fundamental components. Given a specific experimental geometry, the measured spectrum can be represented as a linear combination of these fundamental spectra. To validate our approach, we performed calculations for different point group symmetries, both with and without an applied magnetic field. Within the same framework, we derived expressions for powder spectra in momentum-independent processes and spectra obtained using Bragg spectrometers. This formalism provides a valuable toolkit for optimizing experiment planning, data interpretation, and RIXS simulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a tensor formalism for the polarization dependence of resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) by representing the governing 4-point response function. It claims that this approach disentangles experimental geometry from intrinsic material properties, allowing up to 81 linearly independent fundamental spectra to be measured in dipole-dipole processes for low-symmetry crystals, with the number reduced by point-group symmetry. The work includes calculations for various point groups (with and without magnetic field), expressions for powder spectra in momentum-independent processes, and spectra from Bragg spectrometers, providing a framework for experiment planning and data interpretation.

Significance. If the central tensor decomposition and counting of independent components hold after accounting for the structure of the RIXS amplitude, the framework would supply a systematic toolkit for optimizing polarization-dependent RIXS measurements and extracting material-specific information in low-symmetry systems. The explicit calculations for point groups and derivations for powder/Bragg cases represent concrete strengths that could aid reproducibility in data analysis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that up to 81 linearly independent fundamental spectra can be measured in dipole-dipole RIXS for low-symmetry crystals relies on treating the 4-point response function as a general 4-index tensor. However, the RIXS intensity is |ε_out · χ · ε_in|^2 for a 3×3 complex response matrix χ(ω), so the effective 4-tensor is not general but constructed from the 9 complex elements of χ. This restricts the polarization dependence to at most 18 independent real functions of energy rather than 81 components; symmetry reduction must therefore be applied to this lower-dimensional space. This directly impacts the reported number of fundamental spectra and the overall framework.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit comparison in the introduction or methods section to prior tensor treatments of RIXS polarization dependence to clarify the novelty of the 4-point decomposition.
  2. Notation for the tensor indices and contraction with polarization vectors should be defined with an equation early in the text to avoid ambiguity when expressing measured spectra as linear combinations of fundamental components.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the insightful comment on the structure of the RIXS intensity. We address the major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that up to 81 linearly independent fundamental spectra can be measured in dipole-dipole RIXS for low-symmetry crystals relies on treating the 4-point response function as a general 4-index tensor. However, the RIXS intensity is |ε_out · χ · ε_in|^2 for a 3×3 complex response matrix χ(ω), so the effective 4-tensor is not general but constructed from the 9 complex elements of χ. This restricts the polarization dependence to at most 18 independent real functions of energy rather than 81 components; symmetry reduction must therefore be applied to this lower-dimensional space. This directly impacts the reported number of fundamental spectra and the overall framework.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. We agree that, within the dipole-dipole approximation, the RIXS amplitude takes the form ε_out · χ · ε_in with χ a 3×3 complex matrix whose nine elements are functions of energy loss. The measured intensity is therefore |ε_out · χ · ε_in|^2, which implies that the governing 4-point tensor possesses the specific outer-product structure χ ⊗ χ^* (with appropriate index ordering) rather than being completely general. Consequently, the polarization dependence is fully determined by at most 18 independent real-valued functions of energy (the real and imaginary parts of the elements of χ). Our original statement of “up to 81” did not account for this constraint. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and all sections that report the number of independent components to state that the maximum is 18 for low-symmetry crystals. We will also recompute the symmetry-reduced counts for each point group (with and without magnetic field) on the basis of the 18-dimensional real vector space of possible χ matrices, and we will add a brief discussion clarifying the relation between the 4-point tensor and the underlying response matrix χ. These changes preserve the utility of the linear-combination framework for experiment planning while correcting the counting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: tensor decomposition applies standard symmetry reduction to 4-point response

full rationale

The paper derives the number of independent fundamental spectra by representing the RIXS intensity via a general 4-index tensor and reducing its components under point-group symmetry. This follows directly from the dimensionality of a rank-4 tensor in three dimensions (81 components) and standard representation theory, without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or input quantities that presuppose the output. Calculations for specific symmetries and powder averages are presented as explicit applications of the same framework, remaining self-contained against external benchmarks such as group theory tables. No load-bearing step collapses by construction to a prior result or definition internal to the paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that RIXS is governed by a dipole-dipole 4-point response function expressible as a tensor whose rank is reduced by crystal symmetry; no free parameters or new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The RIXS intensity is governed by a 4-point response function that can be represented as a tensor.
    Stated explicitly as the basis for disentangling geometry from material properties.
  • domain assumption Point-group symmetry of the crystal or molecule reduces the number of linearly independent fundamental spectra that define the RIXS tensor.
    Invoked for the calculations with and without magnetic field and for powder spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5763 in / 1383 out tokens · 72938 ms · 2026-05-21T21:09:00.077608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symmetric estimator for discrete self-energy of discrete many-body systems

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new discrete causal representation of the self-energy is obtained by discretizing Kugler's symmetric estimator for use in impurity models and DMFT.

  2. Unified theory of orientation averaging in X-ray spectroscopies: understanding polarization dependence in a Cartesian tensor approach

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Cartesian tensor method unifies orientation averaging for XAS and RIXS, enabling ab initio predictions of angular and polarization dependence that match Ce L3 edge experiments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Dallera, E

    C. Dallera, E. Puppin, G. Trezzi, N. Incorvaia, A. Fasana, L. Braicovich, N. B. Brookes, and J. B. Goedkoop, Soft X-ray Emission Spectroscopy at ESRF Beamline 26 12 Based on a Helical Undulator, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation3, 231 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Chuang, J

    Y.-D. Chuang, J. Pepper, W. McKinney, Z. Hussain, E. Gullikson, P. Batson, D. Qian, and M. Z. Hasan, High- resolution soft X-ray emission spectrograph at advanced light source, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 66, 2173 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Ghiringhelli, A

    G. Ghiringhelli, A. Piazzalunga, C. Dallera, G. Trezzi, L. Braicovich, T. Schmitt, V. N. Strocov, R. Betemps, L. Patthey, X. Wang, and M. Grioni, SAXES, a high resolution spectrometer for resonant x-ray emission in the 400–1600eV energy range, Review of Scientific In- struments77, 113108 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Alonso-Mori, J

    R. Alonso-Mori, J. Kern, D. Sokaras, T.-C. Weng, D. Nordlund, R. Tran, P. Montanez, J. Delor, V. K. Yachandra, J. Yano, and U. Bergmann, A multi-crystal wavelength dispersive x-ray spectrometer, Review of Sci- entific Instruments83, 073114 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Shvyd’ko, J

    Y. Shvyd’ko, J. Hill, C. Burns, D. Coburn, B. Bra- juskovic, D. Casa, K. Goetze, T. Gog, R. Khacha- tryan, J.-H. Kim, C. Kodituwakku, M. Ramanathan, T. Roberts, A. Said, H. Sinn, D. Shu, S. Stoupin, M. Up- ton, M. Wieczorek, and H. Yavas, MERIX—Next genera- tion medium energy resolution inelastic X-ray scattering instrument at the APS, Journal of Electron...

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Szlachetko, J

    J. Szlachetko, J. S´ a, O. Safonova, G. Smolentsev, M. Szla- chetko, J. Van Bokhoven, and M. Nachtegaal, In situ hard X-ray quick RIXS to probe dynamic changes in the electronic structure of functional materials, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena188, 161 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Boots, D

    M. Boots, D. Muir, and A. Moewes, Optimizing and characterizing grating efficiency for a soft X-ray emis- sion spectrometer, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation20, 272 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    S. G. Chiuzb˘ aian, C. F. Hague, A. Avila, R. Delaunay, N. Jaouen, M. Sacchi, F. Polack, M. Thomasset, B. La- garde, A. Nicolaou, S. Brignolo, C. Baumier, J. L¨ uning, and J.-M. Mariot, Design and performance of AERHA, a high acceptance high resolution soft x-ray spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments85, 043108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Dvorak, I

    J. Dvorak, I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, S. Coburn, and W. Leonhardt, Towards 10 meV resolution: The design of an ultrahigh resolution soft X-ray RIXS spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments87, 115109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Zimina, K

    A. Zimina, K. Dardenne, M. A. Denecke, D. E. Doronkin, E. Huttel, H. Lichtenberg, S. Mangold, T. Pruessmann, J. Rothe, T. Spangenberg, R. Steininger, T. Vitova, H. Geckeis, and J.-D. Grunwaldt, CAT-ACT—A new highly versatile x-ray spectroscopy beamline for catalysis and radionuclide science at the KIT synchrotron light fa- cility ANKA, Review of Scientifi...

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Miyawaki, S

    J. Miyawaki, S. Suga, H. Fujiwara, H. Niwa, H. Kiuchi, and Y. Harada, A compact permanent-magnet system for measuring magnetic circular dichroism in resonant inelastic soft X-ray scattering, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation24, 449 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Moretti Sala, K

    M. Moretti Sala, K. Martel, C. Henriquet, A. Al Zein, L. Simonelli, C. Sahle, H. Gonzalez, M.-C. Lagier, C. Ponchut, S. Huotari, R. Verbeni, M. Krisch, and G. Monaco, A high-energy-resolution resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectrometer at ID20 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation25, 580 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Abela, A

    R. Abela, A. Alarcon, J. Alex, C. Arrell, V. Arsov, S. Bettoni, M. Bopp, C. Bostedt, H.-H. Braun, M. Calvi, T. Celcer, P. Craievich, A. Dax, P. Dijkstal, S. Dorde- vic, E. Ferrari, U. Flechsig, R. Follath, F. Frei, N. Gaiffi, Z. Geng, C. Gough, N. Hiller, S. Hunziker, M. Huppert, R. Ischebeck, H. J¨ ohri, P. Juranic, R. Kalt, M. Kaiser, B. Keil, C. Kittel...

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    J. M. Ablett, D. Prieur, D. C´ eolin, B. Lassalle-Kaiser, B. Lebert, M. Sauvage, T. Moreno, S. Bac, V. Bal´ edent, A. Ovono, M. Morand, F. G´ elebart, A. Shukla, and J.- P. Rueff, The GALAXIES inelastic hard X-ray scatter- ing end-station at Synchrotron SOLEIL, Journal of Syn- chrotron Radiation26, 263 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    E. J. Jaeschke, S. Khan, J. R. Schneider, and J. B. Hast- ings, eds.,Synchrotron Light Sources and Free-Electron Lasers: Accelerator Physics, Instrumentation and Sci- ence Applications(Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    S. H. Nowak, R. Armenta, C. P. Schwartz, A. Gallo, B. Abraham, A. T. Garcia-Esparza, E. Biasin, A. Prado, A. Maciel, D. Zhang, D. Day, S. Christensen, T. Kroll, R. Alonso-Mori, D. Nordlund, T.-C. Weng, and D. Sokaras, A versatile Johansson-type tender x-ray emis- sion spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments91, 033101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Gretarsson, D

    H. Gretarsson, D. Ketenoglu, M. Harder, S. Mayer, F.- U. Dill, M. Spiwek, H. Schulte-Schrepping, M. Tischer, H.-C. Wille, B. Keimer, and H. Yava¸ s, IRIXS: a resonant inelastic X-ray scattering instrument dedicated to X-rays in the intermediate energy range, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation27, 538 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Rovezzi, A

    M. Rovezzi, A. Harris, B. Detlefs, T. Bohdan, A. Svyazhin, A. Santambrogio, D. Degler, R. Baran, B. Reynier, P. Noguera Crespo, C. Heyman, H.-P. Van Der Kleij, P. Van Vaerenbergh, P. Marion, H. Vitoux, C. Lapras, R. Verbeni, M. M. Kocsis, A. Manceau, and P. Glatzel, TEXS: in-vacuum tender X-ray emission spec- trometer with 11 Johansson crystal analyzers, ...

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Weinhardt, R

    L. Weinhardt, R. Steininger, D. Kreikemeyer-Lorenzo, S. Mangold, D. Hauschild, D. Batchelor, T. Spangenberg, and C. Heske, X-SPEC: a 70 eV to 15 keV undulator beamline for X-ray and electron spectroscopies, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation28, 609 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Kokkonen, F

    E. Kokkonen, F. Lopes Da Silva, M.-H. Mikkel˜ a, N. Jo- hansson, S.-W. Huang, J.-M. Lee, M. Andersson, A. Bar- talesi, B. N. Reinecke, K. Handrup, H. Tarawneh, R. Sankari, J. Knudsen, J. Schnadt, C. S˚ athe, and S. Urpelainen, Upgrade of the SPECIES beamline at the MAX IV Laboratory, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 28, 588 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Singh, H

    A. Singh, H. Y. Huang, Y. Y. Chu, C. Y. Hua, S. W. Lin, H. S. Fung, H. W. Shiu, J. Chang, J. H. Li, J. Okamoto, 13 C. C. Chiu, C. H. Chang, W. B. Wu, S. Y. Perng, S. C. Chung, K. Y. Kao, S. C. Yeh, H. Y. Chao, J. H. Chen, D. J. Huang, and C. T. Chen, Development of the Soft X-ray AGM–AGS RIXS beamline at the Taiwan Photon Source, Journal of Synchrotron Ra...

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Glatzel, A

    P. Glatzel, A. Harris, P. Marion, M. Sikora, T.-C. Weng, C. Guilloud, S. Lafuerza, M. Rovezzi, B. Detlefs, and L. Ducotte, The five-analyzer point-to-point scanning crystal spectrometer at ESRF ID26, J Synchrotron Ra- diat.28, 362 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Bauer, J.-S

    K. Bauer, J.-S. Schmidt, F. Eggenstein, R. Decker, K. Ruotsalainen, A. Pietzsch, T. Blume, C.-Y. Liu, C. Weniger, F. Siewert, J. Buchheim, G. Gwalt, F. Senf, P. Bischoff, L. Schwarz, K. Effland, M. Mast, T. Zeschke, I. Rudolph, A. Meißner, and A. F¨ ohlisch, The meV XUV- RIXS facility at UE112-PGM1 of BESSY II, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation29, 908 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    K.-J. Zhou, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, T. Rice, M. Hand, A. Nag, J. Li, S. Agrestini, P. Garland, H. Wang, S. Alcock, I. Nistea, B. Nutter, N. Rubies, G. Knap, M. Gaughran, F. Yuan, P. Chang, J. Em- mins, and G. Howell, I21: an advanced high-resolution resonant inelastic X-ray scattering beamline at Diamond Light Source, Journal of Synchrotron Radia...

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Schlappa, G

    J. Schlappa, G. Ghiringhelli, B. E. Van Kuiken, M. Te- ichmann, P. S. Miedema, J. T. Delitz, N. Gerasimova, S. Molodtsov, L. Adriano, B. Baranasic, C. Broers, R. Carley, P. Gessler, N. Ghodrati, D. Hickin, L. P. Hoang, M. Izquierdo, L. Mercadier, G. Mercurio, S. Parchenko, M. Stupar, Z. Yin, L. Martinelli, G. Merzoni, Y. Y. Peng, T. Reuss, S. Sreekantan N...

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Hayashi, M

    H. Hayashi, M. Kawata, R. Takeda, A. Sato, Y. Uda- gawa, N. Kawamura, and S. Nanao, Selective XANES spectroscopy from RIXS contour maps, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 5th International Con- ference on Inelastic X-ray Scattering (IXS 2004),66, 2168 (2005)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    G. D. Pirngruber, J.-D. Grunwaldt, J. A. Van Bokhoven, A. Kalytta, A. Reller, O. V. Safonova, and P. Glatzel, On the Presence of Fe(IV) in Fe-ZSM-5 and FeSrO 3-x Unequivocal Detection of the 3d 4 Spin System by Reso- nant Inelastic X-ray Scattering, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B110, 18104 (2006)

    work page 2006

  28. [28]

    J. Wu, Y. Yang, and W. Yang, Advances in soft X-ray RIXS for studying redox reaction states in batteries, Dal- ton Transactions49, 13519 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Pidchenko, J

    I. Pidchenko, J. M¨ arz, M. O. J. Y. Hunault, S. Bauters, S. M. Butorin, and K. O. Kvashnina, Synthesis, Struc- tural, and Electronic Properties of K4 Puvi O2 (CO3 )3(cr) : An Environmentally Relevant Plutonium Carbonate Complex, Inorganic Chemistry59, 11889 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Schacherl, M

    B. Schacherl, M. Tagliavini, H. Kaufmann-Heimeshoff, J. G¨ ottlicher, M. Mazzanti, K. Popa, O. Walter, T. Pruessmann, C. Vollmer, A. Beck, R. S. K. Ekanayake, J. A. Branson, T. Neill, D. Fellhauer, C. Reitz, D. Schild, D. Brager, C. Cahill, C. Windorff, T. Sittel, H. Ramanan- toanina, M. W. Haverkort, and T. Vitova, Resonant in- elastic X-ray scattering t...

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco- Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, A. Frano, D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. M. Sala, D. C. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Sutarto, G. A. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and L. Braicovich, Long-Range Incommensurate Charge Fluctuations in (Y,Nd)Ba2Cu3O6+x, Science337, 821 (2012), p...

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Hepting, L

    M. Hepting, L. Chaix, E. W. Huang, R. Fumagalli, Y. Y. Peng, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, W. C. Lee, M. Hashimoto, T. Sarkar, J.-F. He, C. R. Rotundu, Y. S. Lee, R. L. Greene, L. Braicovich, G. Ghiringhelli, Z. X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and W. S. Lee, Three-dimensional collective charge excitations in electron-doped copper ox- ide superconductors,...

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    M. Kang, J. Pelliciari, Y. Krockenberger, J. Li, D. E. McNally, E. Paris, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, H. Yamamoto, T. Schmitt, and R. Comin, Resolving the nature of electronic excitations in resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Physical Review B99, 045105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    J. Lin, J. Yuan, K. Jin, Z. Yin, G. Li, K.-J. Zhou, X. Lu, M. Dantz, T. Schmitt, H. Ding, H. Guo, M. P. M. Dean, and X. Liu, Doping evolution of the charge excita- tions and electron correlations in electron-doped super- conducting La 2-xCexCuO4, npj Quantum Materials5, 4 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Braicovich, L

    L. Braicovich, L. J. P. Ament, V. Bisogni, F. Forte, C. Aruta, G. Balestrino, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, P. G. Medaglia, F. M. Granozio, M. Radovic, M. Sal- luzzo, J. Van Den Brink, and G. Ghiringhelli, Dispersion of Magnetic Excitations in the Cuprate La 2CuO4 and CaCuO2 Compounds Measured Using Resonant X-Ray Scattering, Physical Review Letters102, 1...

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Glawion, J

    S. Glawion, J. Heidler, M. W. Haverkort, L. C. Duda, T. Schmitt, V. N. Strocov, C. Monney, K. J. Zhou, A. Ruff, M. Sing, and R. Claessen, Two-Spinon and Or- bital Excitations of the Spin-Peierls System TiOCl, Phys- ical Review Letters107, 107402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Le Tacon, G

    M. Le Tacon, G. Ghiringhelli, J. Chaloupka, M. M. Sala, V. Hinkov, M. W. Haverkort, M. Minola, M. Bakr, K. J. Zhou, S. Blanco-Canosa, C. Monney, Y. T. Song, G. L. Sun, C. T. Lin, G. M. De Luca, M. Salluzzo, G. Khal- iullin, T. Schmitt, L. Braicovich, and B. Keimer, In- tense paramagnon excitations in a large family of high- temperature superconductors, Na...

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Zhou, Y.-B

    K.-J. Zhou, Y.-B. Huang, C. Monney, X. Dai, V. N. Strocov, N.-L. Wang, Z.-G. Chen, C. Zhang, P. Dai, L. Patthey, J. van den Brink, H. Ding, and T. Schmitt, Persistent high-energy spin excitations in iron-pnictide superconductors, Nature Communications 4, 1470 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Matsubara, C. Dallera, F. Fracassi, R. Gusmeroli, A. Piazzalunga, A. Tagliaferri, N. B. Brookes, A. Kotani, and L. Braicovich, NiO as a test case for high resolution resonant inelastic soft x-ray scat- tering, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter17, 5397 (2005)

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Matsubara, C. Dallera, F. Fra- 14 cassi, A. Tagliaferri, N. B. Brookes, A. Kotani, and L. Braicovich, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering of MnO: L 2,3 edge measurements and assessment of their interpretation, Physical Review B73, 035111 (2006)

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Schlappa, K

    J. Schlappa, K. Wohlfeld, K. J. Zhou, M. Mourigal, M. W. Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Mon- ney, S. Nishimoto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J.-S. Caux, L. Patthey, H. M. Rønnow, J. van den Brink, and T. Schmitt, Spin–orbital separation in the quasi-one- dimensional Mott insulator Sr2CuO3, Nature485, 82 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Yava¸ s, M

    H. Yava¸ s, M. Van Veenendaal, J. Van Den Brink, L. J. P. Ament, A. Alatas, B. M. Leu, M.-O. Apostu, N. Wizent, G. Behr, W. Sturhahn, H. Sinn, and E. E. Alp, Observa- tion of phonons with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter22, 485601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Moser, S

    S. Moser, S. Fatale, P. Kr¨ uger, H. Berger, P. Bugnon, A. Magrez, H. Niwa, J. Miyawaki, Y. Harada, and M. Grioni, Electron-Phonon Coupling in the Bulk of Anatase TiO 2 Measured by Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Spectroscopy, Physical Review Letters115, 096404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Dashwood, A

    C. Dashwood, A. Geondzhian, J. Vale, A. Pakpour- Tabrizi, C. Howard, Q. Faure, L. Veiga, D. Meyers, S. Chiuzb˘ aian, A. Nicolaou, N. Jaouen, R. Jackman, A. Nag, M. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, K.-J. Zhou, A. Wal- ters, K. Gilmore, D. McMorrow, and M. Dean, Prob- ing Electron-Phonon Interactions Away from the Fermi Level with Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering, ...

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Kotani and S

    A. Kotani and S. Shin, Resonant inelastic x-ray scatter- ing spectra for electrons in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.73 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    F. d. Groot and A. Kotani,Core level spectroscopy of solids, Advances in condensed matter science No. v. 6 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2008) oCLC: ocn156785114

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    H. A. Kramers and W. Heisenberg, ¨Uber die Streuung von Strahlung durch Atome, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik31, 681 (1925)

    work page 1925

  48. [48]

    Sch¨ ulke,Electron dynamics by inelastic X-ray scat- tering, Oxford series on synchrotron radiation No

    W. Sch¨ ulke,Electron dynamics by inelastic X-ray scat- tering, Oxford series on synchrotron radiation No. 7 (Ox- ford University Press, Oxford ; New York, 2007) oCLC: ocm85862430

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    J. Luo, G. T. Trammell, and J. P. Hannon, Scattering op- erator for elastic and inelastic resonant x-ray scattering, Physical Review Letters71, 287 (1993)

    work page 1993

  50. [50]

    L. J. P. Ament, F. Forte, and J. van den Brink, Ultrashort lifetime expansion for indirect resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Physical Review B75, 115118 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    M. W. Haverkort, Theory of Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering by Collective Magnetic Excitations, Physical Review Letters105, 167404 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    J. J. Kas, J. J. Rehr, J. A. Soininen, and P. Glatzel, Real- space Green’s function approach to resonant inelastic x- ray scattering, Physical Review B83, 235114 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    Lu and M

    Y. Lu and M. W. Haverkort, Nonperturbative Series Ex- pansion of Green’s Functions: The Anatomy of Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering in the Doped Hubbard Model, Physical Review Letters119, 256401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    A. M. Tsvelik, R. M. Konik, N. V. Prokof’ev, and I. S. Tupitsyn, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in metals: A diagrammatic approach, Physical Review Research1, 033093 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Hariki, M

    A. Hariki, M. Winder, T. Uozumi, and J. Kuneˇ s, LDA + DMFT approach to resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in correlated materials, Physical Review B101, 115130 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Thomas, D

    J. Thomas, D. Banerjee, A. Nocera, and S. Johnston, Theory of Electron-Phonon Interactions in Extended Correlated Systems Probed by Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering, Physical Review X15, 021030 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Glatzel, U

    P. Glatzel, U. Bergmann, J. Yano, H. Visser, J. H. Rob- blee, W. Gu, F. M. F. De Groot, G. Christou, V. L. Peco- raro, S. P. Cramer, and V. K. Yachandra, The Electronic Structure of Mn in Oxides, Coordination Complexes, and the Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II Stud- ied by Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering, Journal of the American Chemical Soci...

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    M. Guo, E. K¨ allman, L. K. Sørensen, M. G. Delcey, R. V. Pinjari, and M. Lundberg, Molecular Orbital Simulations of Metal 1s2p Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A120, 5848 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Polly, B

    R. Polly, B. Schacherl, J. Rothe, and T. Vitova, Rel- ativistic MulticonfigurationalAb InitioCalculation of Uranyl 3d4fResonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering, Inor- ganic Chemistry60, 18764 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    B. T. Thole, G. van der Laan, J. C. Fuggle, G. A. Sawatzky, R. C. Karnatak, and J.-M. Esteva, 3dx-ray- absorption lines and the 3d 94f n+1 multiplets of the lan- thanides, Physical Review B32, 5107 (1985), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 1985

  61. [61]

    F. M. F. de Groot, J. C. Fuggle, B. T. Thole, and G. A. Sawatzky, 2px-ray absorption of 3d transition-metal compounds: An atomic multiplet description including the crystal field, Physical Review B42, 5459 (1990)

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    M. W. Haverkort, M. Zwierzycki, and O. K. Ander- sen, Multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals, Physical Review B85, 165113 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P. S. Pershan, Interactions between Light Waves in a Nonlin- ear Dielectric, Physical Review127, 1918 (1962)

    work page 1918

  64. [64]

    P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Study of Optical Effects Due to an Induced Polarization Third Order in the Elec- tric Field Strength, Physical Review137, A801 (1965)

    work page 1965

  65. [65]

    Duboisset, B

    J. Duboisset, B. Boulanger, S. Brasselet, P. Segonds, and J. Zyss, Nonlinear Optics Through the Field Tensor For- malism, Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2400411 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    M. W. Haverkort, N. Hollmann, I. P. Krug, and A. Tanaka, Symmetry analysis of magneto-optical effects: The case of x-ray diffraction and x-ray absorption at the transition metal L 2 , 3 edge, Physical Review B82, 094403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    Bartolom´ e, M

    F. Bartolom´ e, M. H. Krisch, D. Raoux, and J.-M. Ton- nerre, Quadrupolar excitation channels at the L 3 edge of rare-earth ions probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scat- tering, Physical Review B60, 13497 (1999)

    work page 1999

  68. [68]

    Wende, Z

    H. Wende, Z. Li, A. Scherz, G. Ceballos, K. Baberschke, A. Ankudinov, J. J. Rehr, F. Wilhelm, A. Rogalev, D. L. Schlagel, and T. A. Lograsso, Quadrupolar and dipolar contributions to x-ray magnetic circular dichroism at the Tb L3,2 edges: Experiment versus theory, Journal of Ap- plied Physics91, 7361 (2002)

    work page 2002

  69. [69]

    Hayashi, R

    H. Hayashi, R. Takeda, M. Kawata, Y. Udagawa, N. Kawamura, Y. Watanabe, and S. Nanao, Quadrupole transition in the Dy L 3 edge observed by lifetime- broadening-suppressed XANES spectroscopy, Physical Review B70, 155113 (2004). 15

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    Glatzel, H

    P. Glatzel, H. Schroeder, Y. Pushkar, T. Boron, S. Mukherjee, G. Christou, V. L. Pecoraro, J. Messinger, V. K. Yachandra, U. Bergmann, and J. Yano, Electronic Structural Changes of Mn in the Oxygen-Evolving Com- plex of Photosystem II during the Catalytic Cycle, Inor- ganic Chemistry52, 5642 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Carra, M

    P. Carra, M. Fabrizio, and B. T. Thole, High Resolu- tion X-Ray Resonant Raman Scattering, Physical Review Letters74, 3700 (1995)

    work page 1995

  72. [72]

    L. J. P. Ament, M. Van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. Van Den Brink, Resonant inelastic x- ray scattering studies of elementary excitations, Reviews of Modern Physics83, 705 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    Juhin, C

    A. Juhin, C. Brouder, and F. de Groot, Angular depen- dence of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering: a spherical tensor expansion, Central European Journal of Physics 12, 323 (2014)

    work page 2014

  74. [74]

    K. O. Kvashnina, H. C. Walker, N. Magnani, G. H. Lan- der, and R. Caciuffo, Resonant x-ray spectroscopy of ura- nium intermetallics at theM 4,5 edges of uranium, Phys- ical Review B95, 245103 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Vitova, I

    T. Vitova, I. Pidchenko, D. Fellhauer, P. S. Bagus, Y. Joly, T. Pruessmann, S. Bahl, E. Gonzalez-Robles, J. Rothe, M. Altmaier, M. A. Denecke, and H. Geck- eis, The role of the 5fvalence orbitals of early actinides in chemical bonding, Nature Communications8, 16053 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    M. O. Hunault, Y. Harada, J. Miyawaki, J. Wang, A. Meijerink, F. M. F. De Groot, and M. M. Van Schoon- eveld, Direct Observation of Cr 3+ 3dStates in Ruby: Toward Experimental Mechanistic Evidence of Metal Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A122, 4399 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Elnaggar, A

    H. Elnaggar, A. Nag, M. W. Haverkort, M. Garcia- Fernandez, A. Walters, R.-P. Wang, K.-J. Zhou, and F. De Groot, Magnetic excitations beyond the single- and double-magnons, Nature Communications14, 2749 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    Biniskos, M

    N. Biniskos, M. d. S. Dias, S. Agrestini, D. Svit´ ak, K.-J. Zhou, J. Posp´ ıˇ sil, and P.ˇCerm´ ak, Systematic Mapping of Altermagnetic Magnons by Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Circular Dichroism (2025), arXiv:2503.02533 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    D. Jost, R. B. Regmi, E. G. Lomeli, S. Sahel-Schackis, M. Scheufele, M. Neuhaus, R. Nickel, F. Yakhou, K. Kummer, N. Brookes, L. Shen, G. L. Dakovski, N. J. Ghimire, S. Gepr¨ ags, and M. F. Kling, Chiral Alter- magnon in MnTe (2025), arXiv:2501.17380 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Takegami, T

    D. Takegami, T. Aoyama, T. Okauchi, T. Yamaguchi, S. Tippireddy, S. Agrestini, M. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, T. Mi- zokawa, K. Ohgushi, K.-J. Zhou, J. Chaloupka, J. Kuneˇ s, A. Hariki, and H. Suzuki, Circular Dichroism in Reso- nant Inelastic X-ray Scattering: Probing Altermagnetic Domains in MnTe (2025), arXiv:2502.10809 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.