REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 32 references
A $p$-Converse theorem for Real Quadratic Fields
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper proves that for an elliptic curve over a real quadratic field with split multiplicative reduction at an inert prime p>5, rank-one Mordell–Weil group plus finite p-primary Tate–Shafarevich group forces the Hasse–Weil L-function…
desk verdict First p-converse over a real quadratic field in the multiplicative case, built on a coherent chain of deep published results, but the genuinely new non-base-change case rests on an unproved minimal modular lifting hypothesis. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The carrying object is the Hida family, a p-adic analytic family of Hilbert modular forms that specializes to the eigenform attached to E. Associated to it are a four-variable p-adic L-function and a Selmer group whose dual has a characteristic ideal. The argument is a four-inequality chain: the Iwasawa main conjecture divisibility bounds the order of the p-adic L-function above by a Selmer length; a second-derivative formula bounds that order below by four; Selmer complexes with a p-adic weight pairing, plus Kummer theory, pin the relevant Selmer length to two; and a comparison lemma shows the imprimitive Selmer length is at most the strict length plus two. These force the p-adic order to be exactly four, which is equivalent to order-two vanishing of the complex L-function over a chosen quadratic extension, and the desired order-one vanishing over F follows from a suitable choice of that extension.
What would settle it
Take the paper's explicit example, the base change of the elliptic curve X0(11) to Q(\sqrt{2}) with p=11, and compute the Hasse-Weil L-function near s=1; the theorem predicts L(E/F,1)=0 with a nonzero first derivative, so a computed order of vanishing different from 1 would refute the theorem. Alternatively, compute the order of vanishing at k=2 of the central critical p-adic L-function L_cc_p(f/K,k) for the auxiliary K, which the proof forces to be exactly 4.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central discovery is a conditional proof that, under the hypotheses (irred) and (MML), the conditions rank_Z E(F)=1 and #III(E/F)_{p^\infty}<\infty imply ord_{s=1}L(E/F,s)=1. The proof moves to a carefully chosen imaginary quadratic extension K/F, proves that the central critical p-adic L-function of the associated Hida family vanishes to order exactly four at weight 2, translates this into order-two vanishing of the complex L-function over K, and then uses the factorization L(E/K,s)=L(E/F,s)L(E^K/F,s) together with a nonvanishing twist to conclude order-one vanishing over F. The paper also applies this to elliptic curves over Q, removing a technical hypothesis from an earlier p-converse theorem.
Load-bearing premise
Everything hinges on a technical existence hypothesis called (MML): a certain p-adic modular form must lift the residual Galois representation in a minimal way, and without it the Iwasawa-main-conjecture input cannot be invoked.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the theorem is correct, then for every curve satisfying the hypotheses, rank-one plus finite p-primary Sha is equivalent to ord_{s=1}L(E/F,s)=1, not merely implied by it.
- The proof yields a precise computation: the central critical p-adic L-function has order exactly 4 at weight 2 for the auxiliary quadratic extension K.
- Over Q, the result removes the auxiliary-prime hypothesis from earlier p-converse theorems for split multiplicative primes p>5: rank-one plus finite Sha suffices to conclude analytic rank one.
- The strategy provides a template for extending p-converse theorems to totally real fields when the corresponding modularity and Leopoldt-type hypotheses hold.
Reading between the lines
- Inference: The same proof scheme should adapt to any totally real field satisfying Leopoldt's conjecture and modularity, so the real-quadratic restriction is probably not essential.
- Inference: The p-adic weight pairing constructed here might give a route to rank-one p-converse statements for curves with additive or good reduction at p, once the local pairings are replaced appropriately.
- Inference: The condition (MML) is the real bottleneck; if minimal modular liftings are proven to exist in greater generality, the theorem immediately covers all such curves without further change.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proves a rank-one p-converse for elliptic curves over real quadratic fields, under two global hypotheses called (irred) and (MML). Assuming E/F has split multiplicative reduction at an inert prime p>5, rank one, and finite Tate-Shafarevich group, the authors show ord_{s=1} L(E/F,s)=1. The proof combines Wan's Iwasawa main conjecture for Hilbert modular forms, Mok's p-adic L-function and Heegner point results, and Nekovár's Selmer complexes. The authors also deduce a p-converse over Q and give a worked example with F=Q(√2), p=11, E=X0(11).
Significance. If the hypotheses are met, the result is a genuine extension of the Venerucci/Skinner-Zhang circle of ideas from Q to a real quadratic base field, and the chain of inequalities in §§4–9 is coherent and uses deep published results rather than fitted parameters. The paper's main contribution is the exact computation of a Selmer-complex length (Theorem 7.1), which combined with Wan's divisibility forces the order of vanishing to be exactly 4. The significance is tempered by two limitations: the theorem is explicitly conditional on the unproved minimal modular lifting hypothesis (MML), and the only numerical example verifying (MML) is a base change from Q, so the genuinely new real-quadratic case is not yet demonstrated. I find no internal contradiction in the main chain, but one load-bearing step in the application over Q needs additional justification.
major comments (3)
- [Section 10, proof of Theorem 10.1] The deduction that the hypotheses of Theorem 1.3 hold for the base-changed curve E/F is incomplete. Theorem 1.3 requires (irred) for E/F, but the proof only assumes (irred) for E/Q. Absolute irreducibility of a mod p representation does not automatically survive restriction to a quadratic field: a dihedral representation induced from a quadratic field becomes reducible over that field. The proof should either prove that ρ̄_{E,F} is absolutely irreducible for the particular F constructed, or explicitly choose F so as to avoid the finitely many quadratic fields over which the residual representation becomes reducible. This is load-bearing because Proposition 4.1 uses (irred) to obtain the vanishing of an H^0 that is essential for the control theorem.
- [Section 3.3, Theorem 3.1(3), and Section 11] The main theorem is conditional on (MML), the existence of a minimal modular lifting of ρ̄_f, and this hypothesis is not proved in any genuinely new setting. The example in Section 11 is the base change of X0(11) from Q, so the required minimal lifting is inherited from Q. Since (MML) is exactly the input that supplies Wan's divisibility char ⊂ (L) and hence the inequality in Corollary 4.2, the advertised 'beyond Q' theorem remains conditional on an unverified modular lifting input for non-base-change real quadratic curves. This is not an internal contradiction, but the limitation should be stated prominently in the introduction and abstract, and the paper would be substantially strengthened by an unconditional instance of (MML) for a curve that does not arise as a base change.
- [Section 8, Remark 8.2(c), and Section 9] The proof of Theorem 9.2 uses the assertion that p splits in K, which is equivalent to Ǩ(p)=1. This does follow from the conditions in Lemma 8.1 because nE=np, so the set of primes l dividing nED_F includes p and the condition ξ'(l)=1 for all such l forces Ǩ(p)=1. The manuscript should say this explicitly; as written, the reader is left to infer that the notation nE includes the inert prime p, and a misreading here would invalidate both Corollary 5.2 and the hypotheses of Theorem 7.1.
minor comments (4)
- [Abstract and Section 1] The Tate-Shafarevich group is typeset as 'ΠΠ' throughout the abstract and introduction; this should be corrected to a standard symbol such as III.
- [Corollary 4.2] The step invoking [SU14, Corollary 3.8] to pass characteristic ideals modulo the ideal pcc is very terse; a short explanation of why the reduction is compatible for these Selmer groups would improve readability.
- [Section 11] The example relies on LMFDB data for the rank and the finiteness of the Tate-Shafarevich group and for the 'maximal image' assertion. Please indicate whether these are rigorous proven computations or numerical/conjectural data, since the example is meant to certify all hypotheses.
- [Section 10] In the proof of Theorem 10.1, the notation NE=Np makes the condition ξ(q)=1 for q|NE include q=p; given that the later argument requires ξ(p)=1 and ξ'(p)=-1, a parenthetical clarification would prevent confusion.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the p-converse is a conditional derivation from Wan's external Iwasawa main conjecture and an independent Selmer-length computation; the unproved (MML) hypothesis is a declared scope limitation, not a circular step.
full rationale
The paper's main implication, rank_E(E(F))=1 plus finite III(E/F)_p^∞ implies ord_{s=1} L(E/F,s)=1, is obtained by combining external results with an explicit computation, not by fitting a parameter to the target. Wan's Iwasawa main conjecture (Theorem 3.1) supplies the one-sided divisibility char ⊂ (L_S_K), Corollary 4.2 converts this into the inequality ord_{k=2} L^cc_p ≤ len_P(X^{S,cc}_{F∞}), and Mok's theorem gives the order-of-vanishing comparison with complex L-functions. The Selmer length len_P(X^cc_Gr)=2 is computed independently via Nekovar's p-adic weight pairing and Kummer theory, using the rank-one and finite-III hypotheses; no step defines the analytic objects in terms of the algebraic conclusion. The main theorem is explicitly conditional on (MML), the existence of a minimal modular lifting, which is stated as an assumption in Theorem 3.1(3) and is not proved for a general real quadratic field; Section 11 verifies it only in a base-change example. This is a genuine scope limitation and a correctness risk for the advertised unconditional setting, but it is not circularity because the paper never claims to prove (MML) and does not sneak it in as a prediction. All load-bearing cited theorems are by other authors, so there is no self-citation chain forcing the result. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (6)
- standard math Elliptic curves over real quadratic fields are modular (FLHS15).
- domain assumption Wan's Iwasawa main conjecture for Hilbert modular forms, in the form of Theorem 3.1.
- standard math Mok's results on the two-variable p-adic L-function and its central derivative (Theorem 5.1).
- standard math Nekovar's Selmer complex formalism, including Cassels-Tate pairings (Nek06).
- ad hoc to paper The residual representation rho_f is absolutely irreducible.
- ad hoc to paper There exists a minimal modular lifting of rho_f.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of A $p$-Converse theorem for Real Quadratic Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R7DHG3DT
@misc{pith2026250421799,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: A $p$-Converse theorem for Real Quadratic Fields},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R7DHG3DT}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21799}
}
abstract
Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over a real quadratic field $F$. Let $p > 5$ be a rational prime that is inert in $F$ and assume that $E$ has split multiplicative reduction at the prime $\mathfrak{p}$ of $F$ dividing $p$. Let $\underline{III}(E/F)$ denote the Tate-Shafarevich group of $E$ over $F$ and $ L(E/F,s) $ be the Hasse-Weil complex $L$-function of $E$ over $F$. Under some technical assumptions, we show that when $rank_{\mathbb{Z}} \hspace{0.01mm} \hspace{1mm} E(F) = 1$ and $\#\Big(\underline{III}(E/F)_ {p^\infty}\Big) < \infty$, then $ord_{s=1} \ L(E/F,s) = 1$. Further, we give an application to a $p$-converse theorem over $\mathbb{Q}$.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Massimo Bertolini and Henri Darmon, Hida families and rational points on elliptic curves, Invent. Math. 168 (2007), no. 2, 371--431
work page 2007
-
[2]
John Bergdall and David Hansen, On p -adic L -functions for H ilbert modular forms , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 298 (2024), no. 1489, v+125
work page 2024
-
[3]
Ashay A. Burungale, Christopher Skinner, and Ye Tian, The B irch and S winnerton- D yer conjecture: a brief survey , Nine mathematical challenges---an elucidation, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 104, Amer. Math. Soc., [2021], pp. 11--29
work page 2021
-
[4]
Burungale and Ye Tian, p -converse to a theorem of G ross- Z agier, K olyvagin and R ubin , Invent
Ashay A. Burungale and Ye Tian, p -converse to a theorem of G ross- Z agier, K olyvagin and R ubin , Invent. Math. 220 (2020), no. 1, 211--253
work page 2020
-
[5]
Francesc Castella, Exceptional zeros for heegner points and p -converse to the theorem of gross-zagier and kolyvagin, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01360 (2024)
work page Pith review arXiv 2024
-
[6]
Francesc Castella, Giada Grossi, Jaehoon Lee, and Christopher Skinner, On the anticyclotomic I wasawa theory of rational elliptic curves at E isenstein primes , Invent. Math. 227 (2022), no. 2, 517--580
work page 2022
-
[7]
Francesc Castella and Xin Wan, Perrin- R iou's main conjecture for elliptic curves at supersingular primes , Math. Ann. 389 (2024), no. 3, 2595--2636
work page 2024
-
[8]
Solomon Friedberg and Jeffrey Hoffstein, Nonvanishing theorems for automorphic L -functions on GL (2) , Ann. of Math. (2) 142 (1995), no. 2, 385--423
work page 1995
Show all 32 references
-
[9]
Le Hung, and Samir Siksek, Elliptic curves over real quadratic fields are modular, Invent
Nuno Freitas, Bao V. Le Hung, and Samir Siksek, Elliptic curves over real quadratic fields are modular, Invent. Math. 201 (2015), no. 1, 159--206
2015
-
[10]
Ralph Greenberg, Iwasawa theory for elliptic curves, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9809206 (1998)
1998 arXiv
-
[11]
Gross and Don B
Benedict H. Gross and Don B. Zagier, Heegner points and derivatives of L -series , Invent. Math. 84 (1986), no. 2, 225--320
1986
-
[12]
Haruzo Hida, On p -adic H ecke algebras for GL _2 over totally real fields , Ann. of Math. (2) 128 (1988), no. 2, 295--384
1988
-
[13]
Press, Baltimore, MD, 1989, pp
, Nearly ordinary H ecke algebras and G alois representations of several variables , Algebraic analysis, geometry, and number theory ( B altimore, MD , 1988), Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, 1989, pp. 115--134
1988
-
[14]
, Hilbert modular forms and iwasawa theory, Clarendon Press, 2006
2006
-
[15]
Chan-Ho Kim, On the soft p -converse to a theorem of G ross- Z agier and K olyvagin , Math. Ann. 387 (2023), no. 3-4, 1961--1968
2023
-
[16]
V. A. Kolyvagin, Euler systems, The G rothendieck F estschrift, V ol.\ II , Progr. Math., vol. 87, Birkh\"auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 435--483
1990
-
[17]
The l-functions and modular forms database, http://www.lmfdb.org
-
[18]
David Loeffler and Sarah Livia Zerbes, Iwasawa theory for quadratic hilbert modular forms, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14491 (2020)
2020 arXiv
-
[19]
Chung Pang Mok, The exceptional zero conjecture for H ilbert modular forms , Compos. Math. 145 (2009), no. 1, 1--55
2009
-
[20]
, Heegner points and p -adic L -functions for elliptic curves over certain totally real fields , Comment. Math. Helv. 86 (2011), no. 4, 867--945
2011
-
[21]
310, viii+559
Jan Nekov\'ar, Selmer complexes, Ast\'erisque (2006), no. 310, viii+559
2006
-
[22]
, Compatibility of arithmetic and algebraic local constants, II : the tame abelian potentially B arsotti- T ate case , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 116 (2018), no. 2, 378--427
2018
-
[23]
Ryan, Gonzalo Tornar\'ia, and John Voight, Nonvanishing of twists of L -functions attached to H ilbert modular forms , LMS J
Nathan C. Ryan, Gonzalo Tornar\'ia, and John Voight, Nonvanishing of twists of L -functions attached to H ilbert modular forms , LMS J. Comput. Math. 17 (2014), 330--348
2014
-
[24]
Serre, Local class field theory, Algebraic N umber T heory ( P roc
J.-P. Serre, Local class field theory, Algebraic N umber T heory ( P roc. I nstructional C onf., B righton, 1965), Academic Press, London, 1967, pp. 128--161
1965
-
[25]
Christopher Skinner, A converse to a theorem of G ross, Z agier, and K olyvagin , Ann. of Math. (2) 191 (2020), no. 2, 329--354
2020
-
[26]
Christopher Skinner and Eric Urban, The I wasawa main conjectures for GL_2 , Invent. Math. 195 (2014), no. 1, 1--277
2014
-
[27]
Christopher Skinner and Wei Zhang, Indivisibility of heegner points in the multiplicative case, https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1099 (2014)
2014 arXiv
-
[28]
Rodolfo Venerucci, p-adic regulators and p-adic families of modular forms, Universit \`a degli Studi di Milano (2013)
2013
-
[29]
Rodolfo Venerucci, On the p -converse of the K olyvagin- G ross- Z agier theorem , Comment. Math. Helv. 91 (2016), no. 3, 397--444
2016
-
[30]
Sigma 3 (2015), Paper No
Xin Wan, The I wasawa main conjecture for H ilbert modular forms , Forum Math. Sigma 3 (2015), Paper No. e18, 95
2015
-
[31]
Shouwu Zhang, Heights of H eegner points on S himura curves , Ann. of Math. (2) 153 (2001), no. 1, 27--147
2001
-
[32]
Wei Zhang, Selmer groups and the indivisibility of H eegner points , Camb. J. Math. 2 (2014), no. 2, 191--253
2014
Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.