Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 8 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2304.11085.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T21:19:34.215880Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
31
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Observation 7cf48a22-342a-467c-85f3-49af76bb632a · inbound
Reliable Annotations with Less Effort: Evaluating LLM-Human Collaboration in Search Clarifications Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 58
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b0104c6d-5432-4943-8bda-2d5602a919dc · inbound
Guidelines for Empirical Studies in Software Engineering involving Large Language Models Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 108
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation aee54fdd-811c-430c-8d40-cbcf204260c6 · inbound
Guidelines for Empirical Studies in Software Engineering involving Large Language Models Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 108
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 45d470f2-5af5-4934-89ce-acca95f85e8d · inbound
Noise-Aware Framework for Correcting Corrupted Labels Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 68
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation e2c9264e-c962-4c2f-881f-e285c515485c · inbound
A Data-Centric Framework for Detecting and Correcting Corrupted Labels Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 15
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 2b785a98-f83d-454b-90c7-6026a02a602c · inbound
A Durability and Cross-Language Transfer Benchmark for a Validated Teaching-Feedback Classification Protocol Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 60
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1a1a8552-b3d3-4c48-8279-a63ad4e9b875 · inbound
Auditing Differential Visibility of Political Content on TikTok Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 137
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 0ddc6f45-88e6-4e93-93bf-b9bac1c69eb6 · inbound
Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.