REVIEW 2 cited by
Galaxy Cluster Gas Mass Fraction and Hubble Parameter versus Redshift Constraints on Dark Energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Galaxy cluster gas mass fraction versus redshift data and Hubble parameter versus redshift data are used to jointly constrain dark energy models. These constraints favor the Einstein cosmological constant limit of dark energy but do not strongly rule out slowly-evolving dark energy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Using SPTpol, Planck 2015, and non-CMB data to constrain tilted spatially-flat and untilted non-flat $\Lambda$CDM, XCDM, and $\phi$CDM dark energy inflation cosmologies
Joint constraints from SPTpol, Planck 2015, and non-CMB data in six dark energy cosmologies find no strong data tension and continue to favor spatially closed universes over flat ones.
-
Quasar X-ray and UV flux, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter measurement constraints on cosmological model parameters
Quasar X-ray and UV flux data are weak but consistent with BAO and H(z) data, and the joint data mildly favor closed spatial geometry and dynamical dark energy over flat LambdaCDM.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.