Geometric local $\varepsilon$-factors in higher dimensions

Quentin Guignard

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Geometric local $\varepsilon$-factors in higher dimensions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the global $\varepsilon$-factor of any $\ell$-adic sheaf on a proper scheme over a perfect field of positive characteristic factors as a finite product of local contributions at closed points, built from vanishing…

desk verdict The first higher-dimensional product formula for ε-factors on proper schemes is real and mostly sound, but §5.2 needs a minor finiteness argument. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05888 v2 pith:RBQA3EVX submitted 2019-08-16 math.AG math.NT

Quentin Guignard This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AGmath.NT MSC 14F2014G1711S40

keywords ℓ-adicsheavesε-factorsvanishingcyclesArtinconductorsproductformulapositivecharacteristicGaloisrepresentationsChow'slemma

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a higher-dimensional product formula: for any proper scheme $X$ over a perfect field of positive characteristic $p\neq\ell$, the global $\varepsilon$-factor of any bounded constructible complex of $\ell$-adic sheaves is the determinant of a finite direct sum of Galois modules attached to the closed points of $X$. Each local term is obtained by iterating vanishing cycle functors and exact additive functors called refined Artin conductors, whose ranks and determinants recover the usual Artin conductor and local $\varepsilon$-factor. The same mechanism expresses the Euler characteristic as the rank of the same direct sum. This matters because it reduces a global cohomological invariant to purely local data at closed points, and it yields twist formulas and a stalkwise constancy theorem for $\varepsilon$-factors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the refined Artin conductor $\mathrm{Art}_\pi$, an exact additive functor built from the Gabber-Katz extension functor and the Artin-Schreier sheaf $L_\psi\{-t\}$: $\mathrm{Art}_\pi(M)=H^1_c(\mathbb{A}^1_s,r^{-1}_{s,\pi}M_!\otimes L_\psi\{-t\})$. When applied to the vanishing cycles of a sheaf on the henselization of a curve at a point, Proposition 4.15 gives $\mathrm{rk}(\mathrm{Art}_\pi R\Phi_s^{\mathrm{id}}(F))=a(S(s),F)$ and $\det(\mathrm{Art}_\pi R\Phi_s^{\mathrm{id}}(F))=\varepsilon(S(s),F,d\pi)$, so the rank and determinant of this linearization reproduce the classical invariants. The higher-dimensional local functors $E(X(x),-)$ are assembled from these curve-level ingredients by iterating vanishing cycles and gluing over a Chow cover, with a shift $[1]$ on the exceptional preimage.

What would settle it

Inspect the Section 5.2 assembly for a non-projective proper $X$: compute both sides of Theorem 1.2 for a sheaf supported on the exceptional locus $Z$ and compare with the corresponding computation on the Chow cover $X'$; a failure of the determinant identity or of the tensor-compatibility isomorphism for any such pair would collapse the theorem. A simpler control case is $\mathbb{P}^1_k$ with $F=\Lambda$, where the explicit Section 5.1 formula must reproduce the known $\varepsilon_k(\mathbb{P}^1_k,\Lambda)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.2 asserts that for every proper $k$-scheme $X$ there is a collection $(E(X(x),-))_{x\in|X|}$ of triangulated functors $D^b_c(X(x),\Lambda)\to D^b_c(x,\Lambda)$ satisfying three conditions: local vanishing outside finitely many closed points; compatibility with pullback from the residue field, $E(X(x),F\otimes\mathrm{sp}^{-1}G)\simeq E(X(x),F)\otimes G$; and the identities $\varepsilon_k(X,F)=\det\big(\bigoplus_{x\in|X|}\mathrm{Ind}_{G_k}^{G_x}E(X(x),F|_{X(x)})\big)$ and $-\chi(X,F)=\mathrm{rk}\big(\bigoplus_{x\in|X|}\mathrm{Ind}_{G_k}^{G_x}E(X(x),F|_{X(x)})\big)$. The functors are not unique. The proof reduces to projective space by Chow's lemma, then to $\mathbb{P}^1$ via a pencil, where the curve product formula supplies explicit local terms. The paper derives from this a stalkwise constancy theorem for $\varepsilon$-factors and Euler characteristics, a constancy theorem for Artin conductors and local $\varepsilon$-factors over a henselian trait, and twist formulas for tensor products with local systems.

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the local functors assembled in Section 5.2 from a projective cover, its exceptional locus, and its preimage satisfy the tensor-compatibility axiom for all pairs of sheaves is not written out in full.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Theorem 1.4: if two bounded constructible complexes have isomorphic restrictions to the henselization at every closed point, then their global $\varepsilon$-factors and Euler characteristics coincide.
Twist formula (Theorem 1.6): for a $\Lambda$-local system $G$ of constant rank $r$, $\varepsilon_k(X,F\otimes G)=\varepsilon_k(X,F)^r\prod_{x\in|X|}\big(\det(G_x)\circ\mathrm{ver}_{x/k}\big)^{\mathrm{rk}(E(X(x),F))}$, and $\chi(X,F\otimes G)=r\chi(X,F)$.
Theorem 1.7 extends the twist formula to objects twisted at each closed point by free $\Lambda$-modules of rank $r$ with admissible Galois action.
Over a henselian trait, the Artin conductor and geometric local $\varepsilon$-factor of $Rf_*F$ depend only on the restrictions of $F$ to the henselizations at closed points of the special fiber (Theorem 1.5).
Iterating the construction attaches $(n+1)$-dimensional local $\varepsilon$-factors to Galois representations of $n$-dimensional local fields, so that the $n$-dimensional local $\varepsilon$-factor of $R\Gamma(X_k,F)$ factors into finitely many higher local factors (Remark 6.2).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The non-uniqueness of the local functors suggests that the factorization is a property of determinants rather than of the local Galois modules themselves; asking whether a canonical choice exists once a flag or pencil is fixed is a natural next step.
Remark 6.2 points toward a hierarchy of $n$-dimensional local $\varepsilon$-factors; one could test whether these satisfy a reciprocity law compatible with geometric class field theory, or whether the iteration can be made independent of the auxiliary choices of uniformizers.
The construction works geometrically over any perfect field, so one could test whether the same product formula holds for tame sheaves with general $\Lambda$-coefficients or for the twisted sheaves mentioned in Section 1.8, where a 2-cocycle on $G_k$ is allowed.
Because the proof passes through Chow's lemma and a pencil, the argument may extend to proper algebraic spaces or stacks if the same reduction steps are available there.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Main take: this paper proves the first product formula for geometric ε-factors on arbitrary proper schemes over perfect fields of positive characteristic. That is a real theorem, and the construction via iterated vanishing cycles and refined Artin conductors is the right way to get it. The paper is essentially sound; it should go to a serious referee after some tightening.

What is new: Theorem 1.2 gives, for every proper k-scheme X, local functors E(X(x),−) such that the global ε-factor factors as a determinant of Galois inductions of these local terms. Deligne's Euler-characteristic statement was already known; the ε-factor part is new. The twist formulas in Theorems 1.6–1.7 and the henselian-trait version in Section 6 are useful consequences. The proof is a standard reduction: Chow's lemma, induction on dimension, and pencils, with the P^1 base case coming from the author's curve result [Gu19]. That prior preprint is a genuine prerequisite, so the reader should know this paper stands on it.

Where it is soft: the gluing step in §5.2 is compressed. For x in the exceptional locus Z, the definition of E(X(x),G) is a direct sum over all closed points of the fiber f^{-1}(x). That fiber can be a P^1 and have infinitely many closed points, and the paper does not explicitly show the sum is finite. It is not hard to fix: descend G to an étale neighborhood of x, extend by zero to X', and apply property (1) of Theorem 1.2 to that global object. But as written, the reader has to fill that in. Also, verification of the tensor-compatibility axiom (1.2)(2) for the glued functors is not written out; it is formal from the induction hypothesis, but should be stated. The reduction in §5.4 is terse yet clear.

The main structural risk is the dependence on [Gu19], which is not yet published. If that curve-level result has gaps, the base case collapses. That is a normal preprint reliance, not a red flag, but it is worth knowing.

Bottom line: this paper should not be desk-rejected. It deserves a careful referee, and I expect the main theorem to survive with minor revisions. The local finiteness issue and the missing tensor-compatibility verification should be raised as requests for clarification, not as fundamental objections.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a factorization theorem for the global ε-factor of a bounded constructible ℓ-adic complex on an arbitrary proper scheme over a perfect field of positive characteristic: the global ε-factor and the Euler characteristic are expressed as the determinant and rank of a finite direct sum of induced Galois modules attached to closed points. The local contributions are given by triangulated functors built from iterated vanishing cycles and from refined Artin conductors, which linearize Artin conductors and local ε-factors. The proof uses the curve case [Gu19] as a base, Chow's lemma to reduce to projective schemes, a reduction to projective spaces, and induction on dimension. The paper also derives applications: an ε-factor analogue of Deligne's theorem on Euler characteristics (Theorem 1.4), an invariance statement for Artin conductors and geometric local ε-factors over a henselian trait (Theorem 1.5), and twist formulas (Theorems 1.6 and 1.7).

Significance. If correct, the main theorem is a substantial advance: it extends Laumon's product formula from curves to arbitrary proper schemes in the geometric setting, and it gives new global consequences such as the ε-factor part of Theorem 1.4 and the base-change invariance in Theorem 1.5. The construction of explicit linearized local invariants via refined Artin conductors is original and is likely to have further applications. The paper is clearly organized and the broad strategy is standard and credible. However, the proof of Theorem 1.2 contains a gap in the Chow-lemma gluing step, where the constructed local functors are not shown to land in the bounded derived category of constructible sheaves; this issue is load-bearing for the main theorem.

major comments (2)

[§5.2] In the formula defining E(X(x),G) for x in Z, the direct sum is taken over the closed points x' of the fiber f^{-1}(x). This fiber is a proper k(x)-scheme and can have infinitely many closed points, e.g. the exceptional P^1 of a blow-up of a surface at x. The paper does not prove that only finitely many summands are nonzero for an arbitrary G in D^b_c(X(x),Λ). Theorem 1.2(1) gives finiteness only for the restriction of a global object on X', not for the pullback of a local object, so it cannot be applied directly. Since the theorem requires E(X(x),G) to lie in D^b_c(x,Λ), this is a load-bearing gap rather than a mere omission. A proof is needed, for instance by spreading G out to an étale neighborhood of x and applying the induction hypothesis to the proper fiber f^{-1}(x), together with a compatibility statement for the local functors under étale base change; neither the statement nor the proof of such a compatibility is currently provided.
[§5.2] The verification of the tensor-compatibility axiom (1.2)(2) for the glued functors E(X(x),-) is omitted. The displayed direct-sum definition does not make this compatibility formal: one must check that the restriction to the closed subscheme Z, the functors on X' and Z', and the induction from G_{x'} to G_x interact correctly with the operation F⊗sp^{-1}G, including the projection formula for induction. This verification is necessary because the twist formula in Theorem 1.6 is stated as an immediate consequence of (1.2)(2).

minor comments (4)

[§5.2] The notation f^{-1}F|_{X'(x')} should be clarified: f^{-1}F is a complex on X'×_X X(x), and one uses the canonical morphism X'(x') -> X'×_X X(x) induced by the universal property of henselization.
[§5.4] The sentence 'This and the induction hypothesis ensure that only finitely many terms contribute in the above sum' is justified for a global object F on P(V), but the analogous finiteness property for the local functors applied to an arbitrary local input is precisely the point that is missing in §5.2.
[Introduction] In the paragraph after Theorem 1.5, 'This a consequence of Theorem 6.1' should read 'This is a consequence of Theorem 6.1'.
[Theorem 1.6] In the product over x∈|X| appearing in the twist formula, it would be helpful to state explicitly that the product is finite by Theorem 1.2(1).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the higher-dimensional factorization theorem is built by induction from the external curve-level product formula of [Gu19].

full rationale

The main Theorem 1.2 is not defined in terms of itself or of a fitted parameter. The derivation chain is genuinely hierarchical: (i) Section 5.1 proves the projective-line case by applying the product formula of [Gu19] for curves, which is a prior result about a strictly smaller class of schemes and does not include the higher-dimensional theorem under proof. (ii) Section 5.2 reduces an arbitrary proper scheme X to projective pieces X', Z' and Z via Chow's lemma and induction on dimension, using the determinant identity epsilon_k(X,F)=epsilon_k(Z,F)*epsilon_k(X',F)*epsilon_k(Z',F)^{-1}; this identity is a formal property of determinants of cohomology, not an assumption of the conclusion. (iii) Section 5.3 reduces projective schemes to projective spaces by closed immersion, using epsilon_k(X,F)=epsilon_k(P^d, iota_*F). (iv) Section 5.4 proves the projective-space case by induction on dimension, expressing epsilon_k(P(V),F) through a pencil and applying the induction hypothesis to the fibers, which are lower-dimensional projective spaces. The local functors are explicit composites of vanishing-cycle functors and the refined Artin conductor Art_pi, whose determinant and rank are matched to local epsilon-factors in Corollary 4.15 through the definitions of [Gu19]; no output equation is identical, by construction, to an input equation. The paper also states explicitly that the functors are not uniquely determined by the conclusion, so no uniqueness theorem is being imported to force the construction. The self-citations to [Gu19] are load-bearing but legitimate: they supply the curve-level product formula and the definitions of local epsilon-factors and Artin conductors, and they do not assume the target factorization result. The possible gap in Section 5.2 concerning finiteness of the direct sum over preimages f^{-1}(x) is a completeness or correctness issue, not a circularity, because it does not make an output equal to an input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Pure math paper; no fitted parameters. It relies on standard results in étale cohomology and on the author's earlier curve case [Gu19]. No new empirical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Product formula for global ε-factors on smooth curves over perfect fields ([Gu19], 1.4).
The proof of Theorem 1.2 reduces to the projective line, where the factorization is provided by the author's prior curve result; this is unproved in the present paper.
standard math Grothendieck-Ogg-Shafarevich formula and Deligne's universal local acyclicity theorem ([SGA 4 1/2]).
Used in Section 4 and 5.4 to compute ranks and to ensure vanishing cycles vanish outside finitely many points.
standard math Chow's lemma for proper schemes.
Used in Section 5.2 to reduce the theorem to projective schemes.
standard math Theory of Gabber-Katz extensions from [Ka86], as developed in [Gu19].
Underlies the construction of refined Artin conductors and the contractions used throughout Sections 4 and 5.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric local $\varepsilon$-factors in higher dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RBQA3EVX

@misc{pith2026190805888,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric local $\varepsilon$-factors in higher dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RBQA3EVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05888}
}

abstract

We use former results on geometric local $\varepsilon$-factors over curves in order to prove a factorization result for the determinant of the cohomology of an $\ell$-adic sheaf over an arbitrary proper scheme over a perfect field of positive characteristic $p$ distinct from $\ell$. The local contributions are constructed by iterating vanishing cycle functors as well as certain "refined Artin conductors", the latter being exact additive functors which can be considered as linearized versions of Artin conductors and local $\varepsilon$-factors. We provide several applications of our higher dimensional product formula, such as twist formulas for global $\varepsilon$-factors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

Abbes, T

A. Abbes, T. Saito, ``Local Fourier transform and epsilon factors'', Compositio Mathematica 146 (2010), 1507-1551

work page 2010
[2]

Bhatt, ``Geometric class field theory'', in ``Arbeitsgemeinschaft: The Geometric Langlands Conjecture'', report No

B. Bhatt, ``Geometric class field theory'', in ``Arbeitsgemeinschaft: The Geometric Langlands Conjecture'', report No. 20/2016, p.1037

work page 2016
[3]

Campbell, ``Local Class Field Theory and Cartier Duality'', unpublished

J. Campbell, ``Local Class Field Theory and Cartier Duality'', unpublished

work page
[4]

Contou-Carr\`ere, Jacobienne locale d'une courbe formelle relative, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit\`a di Padova 130 (2013), pp.1-106

C. Contou-Carr\`ere, Jacobienne locale d'une courbe formelle relative, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit\`a di Padova 130 (2013), pp.1-106

work page 2013
[5]

C. W. Curtis, I. Reiner, ``Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras'', Wiley Interscience, 1962

work page 1962
[6]

Deligne, ``Les constantes des \'equations fonctionnelles des fonctions L '', in ``Modular Functions of One Variable II'', Lecture Notes in Mathematics 349, Springer-Verlag, 1973

P. Deligne, ``Les constantes des \'equations fonctionnelles des fonctions L '', in ``Modular Functions of One Variable II'', Lecture Notes in Mathematics 349, Springer-Verlag, 1973

work page 1973
[7]

Deligne, ``La conjecture de Weil : II'', Publications math\'ematiques de l'I.H.E.S., tome 52 (1980), pp

P. Deligne, ``La conjecture de Weil : II'', Publications math\'ematiques de l'I.H.E.S., tome 52 (1980), pp. 137-252

work page 1980
[8]

Dwork, ``On the Artin root number'', Amer

B. Dwork, ``On the Artin root number'', Amer. J. Math. 78, 1956, pp.444-472

work page 1956

Show all 42 references

[9]

Fontaine and Y

J.-M. Fontaine and Y. Ouyang, ``Theory of p -adic Galois representations'', available at https://www.math.u-psud.fr/ fontaine/galoisrep.pdf
[10]

Grothendieck, ``Formule de Lefschetz et rationalit\'e des fonctions L '', S\'eminaire Bourbaki 9, 1966, exp

A. Grothendieck, ``Formule de Lefschetz et rationalit\'e des fonctions L '', S\'eminaire Bourbaki 9, 1966, exp. 279., p.41-55

1966
[11]

A. Grothendieck, S\'eminaire de G\'eom\'etrie Alg\'ebrique du Bois Marie - 1963-64 - Th\'eorie des topos et cohomologie \'etale des sch\'emas - (SGA 4), Springer-Verlag, LNM 269/270/305, 1972/3

1963
[12]

Deligne, S\'eminaire de G\'eom\'etrie Alg\'ebrique du Bois Marie - Cohomologie \'etale - (SGA 4 1/2), Springer-Verlag, LNM 569, 1977

P. Deligne, S\'eminaire de G\'eom\'etrie Alg\'ebrique du Bois Marie - Cohomologie \'etale - (SGA 4 1/2), Springer-Verlag, LNM 569, 1977

1977
[13]

Deligne and N

P. Deligne and N. Katz, S\'eminaire de G\'eom\'etrie Alg\'ebrique du Bois Marie - 1967-69 - Groupes de monodromie en g\'eom\'etrie alg\'ebrique - (SGA 7), vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, LNM 340, 1973

1967
[14]

Guignard, ``On the ramified class field theory of relative curves'', arxiv:1804.02243

Q. Guignard, ``On the ramified class field theory of relative curves'', arxiv:1804.02243

arXiv
[15]

Guignard, ``Geometric local epsilon factors'', arxiv:1902.06523 (v3)

Q. Guignard, ``Geometric local epsilon factors'', arxiv:1902.06523 (v3)

1902 arXiv
[16]

N. M. Katz, ``Local-to-global extensions of representations of fundamental groups'', Annales de l'institut Fourier, tome 36, No. 4, 69-106, 1986

1986
[17]

N. M. Katz, ``Travaux de Laumon'', S\'eminaire Bourbaki² volume 1987/88, expos\'es 686-699, Ast\'erisque, no. 161-162 (1988), Expos\'e no. 691, pp. 105-132

1988
[18]

E. R. Kolchin, ``On Certain Concepts in the Theory of Algebraic Matrix Groups'', Annals of Mathematics Second Series, Vol. 49, No. 4, 774-789, 1948

1948
[19]

Illusie, ``Complexe cotangent et d\'eformations I'', Springer-Verlag, LNM 239, 1972

L. Illusie, ``Complexe cotangent et d\'eformations I'', Springer-Verlag, LNM 239, 1972

1972
[20]

Deligne'', Ast\'erisque 82-83 (1981), pp

Luc Illusie, ``Th\'eorie de Brauer et caract\'eristique d'Euler-Poincar\'e d'apr\`es P. Deligne'', Ast\'erisque 82-83 (1981), pp. 161-172

1981
[21]

Kato and S

K. Kato and S. Saito, ``Unramified class field theory of arithmetical surfaces'', Annals of Mathematics 118 (1983), pp. 241-275

1983
[22]

Lang, ``Sur les s\'eries L d'une vari\'et\'e alg\'ebrique'', Bulletin de la S

S. Lang, ``Sur les s\'eries L d'une vari\'et\'e alg\'ebrique'', Bulletin de la S. M. F. 84 (1956), p. 385-407

1956
[23]

R. P. Langlands, ``On the functional equation of Artin L -functions'', unpublished, available at https://publications.ias.edu/sites/default/files/a-ps.pdf
[24]

Laumon, ``Vanishing cycles over a base of dimension 1 '', Algebraic geometry (Tokyo/Kyoto, 1982), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

G. Laumon, ``Vanishing cycles over a base of dimension 1 '', Algebraic geometry (Tokyo/Kyoto, 1982), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1016, Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 143-150

1982
[25]

Laumon, ``Transformation de Fourier, constantes d'\'equations fonctionnelles et conjecture de Weil'', Publications math\'ematiques de l'I.H.E.S., tome 65 (1987), pp

G. Laumon, ``Transformation de Fourier, constantes d'\'equations fonctionnelles et conjecture de Weil'', Publications math\'ematiques de l'I.H.E.S., tome 65 (1987), pp. 131-210

1987
[26]

Laumon, ``Faisceaux automorphes li\'es aux s\'eries d'Eisenstein'', in Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and L-functions, Vol

G. Laumon, ``Faisceaux automorphes li\'es aux s\'eries d'Eisenstein'', in Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and L-functions, Vol. I, 227-281, Perspect. Math., 10, Academic Press (1990)

1990
[27]

Raskin, ``Geometric Class Field Theory and Drinfeld's functor G , unpublished

S. Raskin, ``Geometric Class Field Theory and Drinfeld's functor G , unpublished
[28]

Rosenlicht, ``Generalized Jacobian Varieties'', Annals of Mathematics 59 (1954), p

M. Rosenlicht, ``Generalized Jacobian Varieties'', Annals of Mathematics 59 (1954), p. 505-530

1954
[29]

Saito, ``The characteristic cycle and the singular support of a constructible sheaf'', Inventiones mathematicae 207(2) (2017), pp

T. Saito, ``The characteristic cycle and the singular support of a constructible sheaf'', Inventiones mathematicae 207(2) (2017), pp. 597-695

2017
[30]

Serre, ``Groupes alg\'ebriques et corps de classes'', Hermann (Paris), 1959

J.-P. Serre, ``Groupes alg\'ebriques et corps de classes'', Hermann (Paris), 1959

1959
[31]

Serre, ``Sur les corps locaux \`a corps r\'esiduel alg\'ebriquement clos'', Bulletin de la S

J.-P. Serre, ``Sur les corps locaux \`a corps r\'esiduel alg\'ebriquement clos'', Bulletin de la S. M. F. 89 (1961), p. 105-154

1961
[32]

Serre, ``Corps locaux'', Hermann (Paris), 1968

J.-P. Serre, ``Corps locaux'', Hermann (Paris), 1968

1968
[33]

Serre, ``Cohomologie galoisienne'', Springer, 1994

J.-P. Serre, ``Cohomologie galoisienne'', Springer, 1994

1994
[34]

Serre, ``Repr\'esentations lin\'eaires des groupes finis'', Hermann, M\'ethodes, 1998

J.-P. Serre, ``Repr\'esentations lin\'eaires des groupes finis'', Hermann, M\'ethodes, 1998

1998
[35]

Suzuki, ``Some remarks on the local class field theory of Serre and Hazewinkel'', Bulletin de la S.M.F

T. Suzuki, ``Some remarks on the local class field theory of Serre and Hazewinkel'', Bulletin de la S.M.F. 141 (2013), p. 1-24

2013
[36]

Serre, J

J.-P. Serre, J. Tate, ``Good Reduction of Abelian Varieties'', Annals of Mathematics Second Series, Vol. 88, No. 3, 492-517, 1968

1968
[37]

The Stacks Project Authors , Stacks P roject , http://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2019

2019
[38]

Takeuchi, ``Blow-ups and the class field theory for curves'', arxiv:1804.02136

D. Takeuchi, ``Blow-ups and the class field theory for curves'', arxiv:1804.02136

arXiv
[39]

Umezaki, E

N. Umezaki, E. Yang, Y. Zhao, ``Characteristic class and the epsilon factor of an \'etale sheaf'', arxiv:1701.02841

arXiv
[40]

Yasuda, ``Local Constants in Torsion Rings'', Journal of Mathematical Sciences (University of Tokyo), Vol

S. Yasuda, ``Local Constants in Torsion Rings'', Journal of Mathematical Sciences (University of Tokyo), Vol. 16, No. 2, 125-197, 2009

2009
[41]

Yasuda, ``The Product Formula for Local Constants in Torsion Rings'', Vol

S. Yasuda, ``The Product Formula for Local Constants in Torsion Rings'', Vol. 16, No. 2, 199-230, 2009

2009
[42]

Yasuda, ``Local _0 -characters in torsion rings'', Journal de Th\'eorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, Vol

S. Yasuda, ``Local _0 -characters in torsion rings'', Journal de Th\'eorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, Vol. 19, 763-797, 2007

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Abbes, T

A. Abbes, T. Saito, ``Local Fourier transform and epsilon factors'', Compositio Mathematica 146 (2010), 1507-1551

work page 2010

[2] [2]

Bhatt, ``Geometric class field theory'', in ``Arbeitsgemeinschaft: The Geometric Langlands Conjecture'', report No

B. Bhatt, ``Geometric class field theory'', in ``Arbeitsgemeinschaft: The Geometric Langlands Conjecture'', report No. 20/2016, p.1037

work page 2016

[3] [3]

Campbell, ``Local Class Field Theory and Cartier Duality'', unpublished

J. Campbell, ``Local Class Field Theory and Cartier Duality'', unpublished

work page

[4] [4]

Contou-Carr\`ere, Jacobienne locale d'une courbe formelle relative, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit\`a di Padova 130 (2013), pp.1-106

C. Contou-Carr\`ere, Jacobienne locale d'une courbe formelle relative, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit\`a di Padova 130 (2013), pp.1-106

work page 2013

[5] [5]

C. W. Curtis, I. Reiner, ``Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras'', Wiley Interscience, 1962

work page 1962

[6] [6]

Deligne, ``Les constantes des \'equations fonctionnelles des fonctions L '', in ``Modular Functions of One Variable II'', Lecture Notes in Mathematics 349, Springer-Verlag, 1973

P. Deligne, ``Les constantes des \'equations fonctionnelles des fonctions L '', in ``Modular Functions of One Variable II'', Lecture Notes in Mathematics 349, Springer-Verlag, 1973

work page 1973

[7] [7]

Deligne, ``La conjecture de Weil : II'', Publications math\'ematiques de l'I.H.E.S., tome 52 (1980), pp

P. Deligne, ``La conjecture de Weil : II'', Publications math\'ematiques de l'I.H.E.S., tome 52 (1980), pp. 137-252

work page 1980

[8] [8]

Dwork, ``On the Artin root number'', Amer

B. Dwork, ``On the Artin root number'', Amer. J. Math. 78, 1956, pp.444-472

work page 1956