Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scholarly Knowledge Extraction from Published Software Packages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.07921 v1 pith:RBQNZHVU submitted 2022-12-15 cs.DL

classification cs.DL
keywords softwareknowledgepackagespublishedscholarlyinformationextractedextraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A plethora of scientific software packages are published in repositories, e.g., Zenodo and figshare. These software packages are crucial for the reproducibility of published research. As an additional route to scholarly knowledge graph construction, we propose an approach for automated extraction of machine actionable (structured) scholarly knowledge from published software packages by static analysis of their (meta)data and contents (in particular scripts in languages such as Python). The approach can be summarized as follows. First, we extract metadata information (software description, programming languages, related references) from software packages by leveraging the Software Metadata Extraction Framework (SOMEF) and the GitHub API. Second, we analyze the extracted metadata to find the research articles associated with the corresponding software repository. Third, for software contained in published packages, we create and analyze the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) representation to extract information about the procedures performed on data. Fourth, we search the extracted information in the full text of related articles to constrain the extracted information to scholarly knowledge, i.e. information published in the scholarly literature. Finally, we publish the extracted machine actionable scholarly knowledge in the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools