REVIEW 1 cited by
A remark on the independence number of sparse random Cayley sum graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The Cayley sum graph $\Gamma_S$ of a set $S \subseteq \mathbb{Z}_n$ is defined on the vertex set $\mathbb{Z}_n$, with an edge between distinct $x, y \in \mathbb{Z}_n$ if $x + y \in S$. Campos, Dahia, and Marciano have recently shown that if $S$ is formed by taking each element in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ independently with probability $p$, for $p > (\log n)^{-1/80}$, then with high probability the largest independent set in $\Gamma_S$ is of size $$ (2 + o(1)) \log_{1/(1-p)}(n). $$ This extends a result of Green and Morris, who considered the case $p = 1/2$, and asymptotically matches the independence number of the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$. We improve the range of $p$ for which this holds to $p > (\log n)^{-1/3 + o(1)}$. The heavy lifting has been done by Campos, Dahia, and Marciano, and we show that their key lemma can be used a bit more efficiently.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dense sets without large sumsets
A δ-dense random subset of [n] almost surely contains no sumset A+B unless one side has size below about 3 log n/log(1/δ), matching the known lower bound up to factor 3.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.