Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Review-based Recommender Systems: A Survey of Approaches, Challenges and Future Perspectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.05562 v3 pith:RG2UNCCE submitted 2024-05-09 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords systemsrecommenderreviewsratingsusersfeaturesreview-basedanalyzing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems play a pivotal role in helping users navigate an overwhelming selection of products and services. On online platforms, users have the opportunity to share feedback in various modes, including numerical ratings, textual reviews, and likes/dislikes. Traditional recommendation systems rely on users explicit ratings or implicit interactions (e.g. likes, clicks, shares, saves) to learn user preferences and item characteristics. Beyond these numerical ratings, textual reviews provide insights into users fine-grained preferences and item features. Analyzing these reviews is crucial for enhancing the performance and interpretability of personalized recommendation results. In recent years, review-based recommender systems have emerged as a significant sub-field in this domain. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the developments in review-based recommender systems over recent years, highlighting the importance of reviews in recommender systems, as well as the challenges associated with extracting features from reviews and integrating them into ratings. Specifically, we present a categorization of these systems and summarize the state-of-the-art methods, analyzing their unique features, effectiveness, and limitations. Finally, we propose potential directions for future research, including the integration of multimodal data, multi-criteria rating information, and ethical considerations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning to Shop Like Humans: A Review-driven Retrieval-Augmented Recommendation Framework with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RevBrowse retrieves preference-relevant pros and cons from reviews via a contrastively trained module, then uses an LLM to rerank candidates; experiments on four Amazon datasets show consistent improvements over baselines.

Pith tools