REVIEW 2 cited by
LIMCA: LLM for Automating Analog In-Memory Computing Architecture Design Exploration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Resistive crossbars enabling analog In-Memory Computing (IMC) have emerged as a promising architecture for Deep Neural Network (DNN) acceleration, offering high memory bandwidth and in-situ computation. However, the manual, knowledge-intensive design process and the lack of high-quality circuit netlists have significantly constrained design space exploration and optimization to behavioral system-level tools. In this work, we introduce LIMCA, a novel fine-tune-free Large Language Model (LLM)-driven framework for automating the design and evaluation of IMC crossbar architectures. Unlike traditional approaches, LIMCA employs a No-Human-In-Loop (NHIL) automated pipeline to generate and validate circuit netlists for SPICE simulations, eliminating manual intervention. LIMCA systematically explores the IMC design space by leveraging a structured dataset and LLM-based performance evaluation. Our experimental results on MNIST classification demonstrate that LIMCA successfully generates crossbar designs achieving $\geq$96% accuracy while maintaining a power consumption $\leq$3W, making this the first work in LLM-assisted IMC design space exploration. Compared to existing frameworks, LIMCA provides an automated, scalable, and hardware-aware solution, reducing design exploration time while ensuring user-constrained performance trade-offs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PCB-QA: Evaluating LLMs over the First Printed Circuit Board Design Question-Answer Dataset
PCB-QA is the first QA benchmark for LLMs on printed circuit board designs, with Gemini 3 Flash Preview reaching 93% accuracy on a JSON textual representation.
-
SEAM: Semantically Equivalent Across Modalities Benchmark for Vision-Language Models
SEAM measures VLM reasoning consistency across modalities using paired semantically equivalent textual and visual notations, and finds systematic vision-language imbalance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.