Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LIMCA: LLM for Automating Analog In-Memory Computing Architecture Design Exploration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.13301 v2 pith:RL3HMZMY submitted 2025-03-17 cs.AR

classification cs.AR
keywords designlimcaexplorationspaceanalogarchitectureautomatedautomating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Resistive crossbars enabling analog In-Memory Computing (IMC) have emerged as a promising architecture for Deep Neural Network (DNN) acceleration, offering high memory bandwidth and in-situ computation. However, the manual, knowledge-intensive design process and the lack of high-quality circuit netlists have significantly constrained design space exploration and optimization to behavioral system-level tools. In this work, we introduce LIMCA, a novel fine-tune-free Large Language Model (LLM)-driven framework for automating the design and evaluation of IMC crossbar architectures. Unlike traditional approaches, LIMCA employs a No-Human-In-Loop (NHIL) automated pipeline to generate and validate circuit netlists for SPICE simulations, eliminating manual intervention. LIMCA systematically explores the IMC design space by leveraging a structured dataset and LLM-based performance evaluation. Our experimental results on MNIST classification demonstrate that LIMCA successfully generates crossbar designs achieving $\geq$96% accuracy while maintaining a power consumption $\leq$3W, making this the first work in LLM-assisted IMC design space exploration. Compared to existing frameworks, LIMCA provides an automated, scalable, and hardware-aware solution, reducing design exploration time while ensuring user-constrained performance trade-offs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PCB-QA: Evaluating LLMs over the First Printed Circuit Board Design Question-Answer Dataset

    cs.AR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    PCB-QA is the first QA benchmark for LLMs on printed circuit board designs, with Gemini 3 Flash Preview reaching 93% accuracy on a JSON textual representation.

  2. SEAM: Semantically Equivalent Across Modalities Benchmark for Vision-Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SEAM measures VLM reasoning consistency across modalities using paired semantically equivalent textual and visual notations, and finds systematic vision-language imbalance.

Pith tools